Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: MADMAX6 on July 23, 2007, 03:01:50 PM

Title: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: MADMAX6 on July 23, 2007, 03:01:50 PM
I should preface this by "In a good way"  LOL!!
Check it!

http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2007/jul/23/one-muscular-marriage/
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: genrommel74 on July 23, 2007, 03:11:57 PM
For once something that inst negative about bodybuilding
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: SWOLETRAIN on July 23, 2007, 03:12:41 PM
Hes like a media friendly titus
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: G o a t b o y on July 23, 2007, 03:24:43 PM
They're a couple of religious kooks. 
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: bigmikecox on July 23, 2007, 03:25:48 PM
Hes like a media friendly titus

LMAO!!!!
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: IceCold on July 23, 2007, 03:27:32 PM
They're a couple of religious kooks. 

despite both of them making their livelyhood dependent upon drug use.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: G o a t b o y on July 23, 2007, 05:53:09 PM
It's Lee with hair gel!  ::)
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: New Hank Wood on July 23, 2007, 05:59:08 PM
With Phil Heath

Phil Heath aint known for his height! 

On a positive note, they shake hands like real tough guys though!

Bottom line, too many little,little men in this game! 
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: G o a t b o y on July 23, 2007, 06:08:32 PM
There are a few guys over 6', and several guys at a "normal" 5' 10" or 5' 11".

That said, I guarantee the average height of pro bodybuilders is several inches shorter than the average height of the general population. 
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: tweeter on July 23, 2007, 06:14:34 PM

I would say Peter is about 5'6" - 5'7"
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: akers1021 on July 23, 2007, 06:28:05 PM
I would say Peter is about 5'6" - 5'7"

Yeah hs is 5'6"  that article was good, I am glad they did not seem to butcher it up like the media does sometimes.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: akers1021 on July 23, 2007, 06:35:30 PM
Here is one of Corinth's recent pics...he is bulking right now

epic 1986 printer, rayon pants and squadfather's old shirt.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: tweeter on July 23, 2007, 06:37:30 PM
epic 1986 printer, rayon pants and squadfather's old shirt.
He would have upgraded but all of his money is tied up in hedge funds and real estate!
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: corinth on July 23, 2007, 06:44:59 PM
AWWWWW....I'm sorry tweeter, did I insult your hero?

My bad man, please don't cry, I didn't really mean it.

Your hero Peter is great, he's awesome..........I mean nothing's cooler than a 5-5 bleach bleach blonde with an earring and a tattoo.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: tweeter on July 23, 2007, 06:48:35 PM

Indeed my friend...I don't think he has an earring though; maybe you have just looked more closely than I have :-\
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: TheEgoCrusher on July 23, 2007, 06:50:11 PM
That's a much better article than that metro pulse piece a while back.  About the only thing the metro pulse is good for is lining your dog cage or whipping your rear with if you're out of toilet paper.  I'm surprised it took the sentinel that long to run a story on them, actually.  I figured they would have done so about 7 or 8 months ago.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: TheEgoCrusher on July 23, 2007, 06:55:21 PM
I give them a hard time sometimes but they are good for Knoxville overall.  Anything that makes people here more health conscious can't be a bad thing.  I've said some things to them I regret saying but you can't go back in time and take things back.  Everybody does stupid stuff.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: H-BOMB on July 23, 2007, 07:06:05 PM


Sorry to break the news to you, but I'm not Peter.  Why in the world he be on the board yacking prior to the USA's?  Epic jealousy of someone who has hair!
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: TheEgoCrusher on July 23, 2007, 07:09:27 PM
How long have you lived in Knoxville? I lived there my whole life until I moved to Atlanta last month.

I grew up in Blount County but moved to Knoxville when I was 19.  Been here for 10 years this summer.

Did you ever met big Dave Dixon at the West Rush?  Dave is freaking HUGE!  His height works against him but he's probably the biggest "muscular" guy around here.  Dave's probably 6' or 6'1".  Peter is the thickest guy around here, though.  Has by far the best legs and arms around here (that I've seen anyway). 
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: TheEgoCrusher on July 23, 2007, 07:13:29 PM
Black.  Probably weighs about 265-270 most of the year.  Massive guy.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Pete Nice on July 23, 2007, 10:03:28 PM
Peter Putnam has no eyebrows....and still gets to make love to that hot ass??
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: dizzleman06 on July 24, 2007, 01:39:05 PM
Yeah his life definately sucks. ::)

I wanna be on her...yeah, definately want to be on her! ;D
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: emn1964 on July 24, 2007, 04:23:04 PM
I like this quote:  Steroids are a problem, but maybe not as much as you think. “(Bodybuilders) will always be the poster boys because our uniform is our body,” Peter Putnam said. “It is no worse in bodybuilding than it is in track and field, baseball or any sport.”

Putnam can't be serious can he?  "It is no worse in bodybuilding than it is in track and field, baseball or any sport.”  In bodybuilding, whether it is at a local NPC show or at the nationals, if you aren't on drugs you aren't even on stage.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: akers1021 on July 24, 2007, 04:42:31 PM
I like this quote:  Steroids are a problem, but maybe not as much as you think. “(Bodybuilders) will always be the poster boys because our uniform is our body,” Peter Putnam said. “It is no worse in bodybuilding than it is in track and field, baseball or any sport.”

Putnam can't be serious can he?  "It is no worse in bodybuilding than it is in track and field, baseball or any sport.”  In bodybuilding, whether it is at a local NPC show or at the nationals, if you aren't on drugs you aren't even on stage.

National YES, however I myself just qualified for the Nationals winning an Open class drug free.  But yeah that quote is WAS over the edge.  I am sure Bonds and Ben Johnson were both on 5+ compunds and up to 3 grams of test a week ::)
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: tweeter on July 24, 2007, 04:44:39 PM
National YES, however I myself just qualified for the Nationals winning an Open class drug free.  But yeah that quote is WAS over the edge.  I am sure Bonds and Ben Johnson were both on 5+ compunds and up to 3 grams of test a week ::)
The difference is just that bodybuilding doesn't test. If others sports didn't test either, it would be the same across the board. People just don't want to get caught.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: TheEgoCrusher on July 24, 2007, 07:12:36 PM
I like this quote:  Steroids are a problem, but maybe not as much as you think. “(Bodybuilders) will always be the poster boys because our uniform is our body,” Peter Putnam said. “It is no worse in bodybuilding than it is in track and field, baseball or any sport.”

Putnam can't be serious can he?  "It is no worse in bodybuilding than it is in track and field, baseball or any sport.”  In bodybuilding, whether it is at a local NPC show or at the nationals, if you aren't on drugs you aren't even on stage.

Well, if you look at the efforts the competitors must go to to AVOID being CAUGHT using drugs, Track and Field is by FAR the worst when it comes to drug abuse.  The WADA is as strict on testing as any sports association/group in the world.  The name of it's Director, Dick Pound, always cracks me up  ;D

BUT, the I.F.B.B. and N.P.C. being compared to Track and Field, MLB, the NFL or NBA is flat out LAUGHABLE.  Why?  Because those bodybuilding organizations HAVE NO TESTING POLICY.  Their refusal to test simply encourages the use of drugs and further champions the "freaks of science" which their organizations produce.  Notice I didn't say "freaks of nature" because guys like Cutler, Coleman, Yates, Wheeler, etc. are NOT "freaks of nature" or "genetically gifted" like those that are engulfed by those industries would have you believe.  They are freaks of SCIENCE.  Genetics play FAR less of a role than the use of various compounds in HIGH dosages.  For those guys to actually admit that they are NOT "freaks" of nature but simply guys that use a lot of drugs and respond well to them, well, their Ego's would be Crushed...(Might be a good suggestion for a screen name.......)

The NFL, for instance, is FULL of guys that could be HIGH LEVEL N.P.C. competitors or even I.F.B.B. pros IF they choose to use the drugs that those involved in bodybuilding use and dedicated their life to the eating and training.  These people involved in bodybuilding to the extent that they are ALMOST pros or ARE pros do not realize that they are simply the left-overs that didn't have what it takes to make a living playing a SPORT.  The REAL "genetic freaks" in our society are in the NFL and NBA (to an extent), NOT in bodybuilding.  That is reality.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: akers1021 on July 25, 2007, 02:43:33 PM
This is a pic of Peter before he competed and completely clean. I also know that he was clean when he qualifed for nationals weighing in the mid-160's.

He looks good there, how old was he? You can tell he had good leg genetics.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: tweeter on July 25, 2007, 02:55:07 PM
He looks good there, how old was he? You can tell he had good leg genetics.
Not sure how old here.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: garraeth on July 25, 2007, 05:03:44 PM
Cudos. Great article!
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: njflex on July 25, 2007, 07:35:54 PM
clean or not their,that is a great genetic base to build on.kudos for his progress even "on",he took a good base and ran with it.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: rockyfortune on July 26, 2007, 06:06:22 AM
despite both of them making their livelyhood dependent upon drug use.


but it's good drug use...  :P
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: nycbull on July 26, 2007, 07:33:19 AM
I have to laugh when I see these Southern and Midwestern religious born againers. The men always look like gay men from the 1980's. The same men they persecuted, marginized and wanted to go away. I guess that was there plan. Drive them off the earth and then claim the style as their own...hahahaha
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: MAXX on July 26, 2007, 07:41:06 AM
Quote
DISPELLING THE MYTHS ABOUT BODYBUILDERS

They’re not all meatheads: “I’ve met some of the most intelligent people at bodybuilding shows,” Peter Putnam said. He said bodybuilders need knowledge of everything from nutrition to physiology to physics.

It’s not all about lifting weights. “About three-fourths of bodybuilding is nutrition,” Peter Putnam said. “You get big by eating proper foods and getting adequate rest.”

Bigger isn’t always better. In Jessica Putnam’s figure competition, she said the judges look for proportion and “broad shoulders, a narrow waist and shapely legs.” But even in Peter Putnam’s field, he said judges are looking for more natural-looking guys.

Steroids are a problem, but maybe not as much as you think. “(Bodybuilders) will always be the poster boys because our uniform is our body,” Peter Putnam said. “It is no worse in bodybuilding than it is in track and field, baseball or any sport.”

Not everyone’s driven by vanity. “As Christians, Peter and I want to give back,” Jessica Paxson-Putnam said. “It’s not all about us.”



 ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: bigtraps on July 26, 2007, 07:49:06 AM
DISPELLING THE MYTHS ABOUT BODYBUILDERS

They’re not all meatheads: “I’ve met some of the most intelligent people at bodybuilding shows,” Peter Putnam said. He said bodybuilders need knowledge of everything from nutrition to physiology to physics.

It’s not all about lifting weights. “About three-fourths of bodybuilding is nutrition,” Peter Putnam said. “You get big by eating proper foods and getting adequate rest.”

Bigger isn’t always better. In Jessica Putnam’s figure competition, she said the judges look for proportion and “broad shoulders, a narrow waist and shapely legs.” But even in Peter Putnam’s field, he said judges are looking for more natural-looking guys.

Steroids are a problem, but maybe not as much as you think. “(Bodybuilders) will always be the poster boys because our uniform is our body,” Peter Putnam said. “It is no worse in bodybuilding than it is in track and field, baseball or any sport.”

Not everyone’s driven by vanity. “As Christians, Peter and I want to give back,” Jessica Paxson-Putnam said. “It’s not all about us.”


"As Christians", what the hell are they giving back.  Are you kidding me.  What a couple of dorks.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: MAXX on July 26, 2007, 07:53:22 AM
"As Christians", what the hell are they giving back.  Are you kidding me.  What a couple of dorks.
haha. and bodybuilders use no more drugs than baseball players?

yeah baseball players use test/insulin/hgh + 15 other androgens ...  ::)
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: bigtraps on July 26, 2007, 07:55:54 AM
haha. and bodybuilders use no more drugs than baseball players?

yeah baseball players use test/insulin/hgh + 15 other androgens ...  ::)

Thank you.  Well said.  Who are the 2 ass wipes?
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: genrommel74 on July 26, 2007, 12:54:40 PM
Why is it that if someone in the bbbing industry has something good said about them by people outside the industry, that people in the industry start bashing and hatting on them. All those that hatting on peter are just jealous, that he is doing well in bbing and they are not
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: coltrane on July 26, 2007, 02:29:25 PM
I met Peter in my gym in dayton ohio, and the dude was real cool..  I asked his advice about shoulders and he went out of his way to talk to me.  so say what you want, but the dude was real cool and his wife is kick ass smokin' hot.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Montague on October 11, 2007, 08:09:24 AM
I worked the ABB table at the Pgh. Pro Figure show one year. Jessica was there.
I didn’t talk at any real length with her, but she was very polite and seemed like a nice girl.

Very attractive – even more so in person.
Never met the hubby.

Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: The Squadfather on October 11, 2007, 08:12:07 AM
she's very pretty, they seem like nice people but i don't see the hype about this guy Peter, pretty good arms but that's it really, don't understand all the magazine covers, we've got a local guy from here in St. Louis named Mark Erpelding who totally destroys Peter but doesn't get anywhere near the coverage.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: bigdumbbell on October 11, 2007, 08:23:41 AM
they could be the ken and barbie of this decade.  oh so superficial  lol 
the muscles are about as authentic as the hair color LOL
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: kiwiol on October 11, 2007, 08:25:47 AM

Everyone fades away slowly my friend. The question is, how bright were you at your brightest?
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: michael arvilla on October 11, 2007, 08:27:08 AM
No Jessica in that Video................... ......... >:(
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: kiwiol on October 11, 2007, 08:28:46 AM

Obviously not, judging from the pics of him when he was young. Drugs or no drugs, he seems to have a nice life and he's got a stunning wife. Doesn't look like such a bad deal to me.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: bigdumbbell on October 11, 2007, 08:44:25 AM
Obviously not, judging from the pics of him when he was young. Drugs or no drugs, he seems to have a nice life and he's got a stunning wife. Doesn't look like such a bad deal to me.
cheer up, it's going to be a better day today! :)
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: onlyme on October 11, 2007, 08:47:10 AM
she's very pretty, they seem like nice people but i don't see the hype about this guy Peter, pretty good arms but that's it really, don't understand all the magazine covers, we've got a local guy from here in St. Louis named Mark Erpelding who totally destroys Peter but doesn't get anywhere near the coverage.

Have you met them.  Doubt it.  But you did get the "she's pretty" thing right.  I had dinner with them at the Olympia with her, Peter, Flex and his girlfriend.  The all seemed very nice and actually well spoken.  Very business like the both of them.  They know they need to market themselves to make money.  (That is why your buddy Mark doesn't get any coverage).  As I was waiting for my car at valet Jessica was there waiting for a cab and I told her I'd give her a ride to her hotel.  She is very smart and she knows what to do to get sponsors for her and Peter.  I think there was a thread on here bashing her and Peter.  And after actually talking to them and spending some time I can tell everyone who bashes them has never met them .  These two would be very good for the image of BB.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: kiwiol on October 11, 2007, 08:48:47 AM
cheer up, it's going to be a better day today! :)

Why Thank you ;D
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: coltrane on October 11, 2007, 08:52:40 AM
i met the both of them.

they were filming a work out video of the two of them in my now old gym in ohio.  And yes, she is ultra hot in person.  he is pretty cool too.  One of the trainers in my gym that i talk w is her ex boyfriend and you could tell he was  a little uptight about seeing the two of them in there together. 

god she is a sight in person
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: H-BOMB on October 11, 2007, 08:55:28 AM
she's very pretty, they seem like nice people but i don't see the hype about this guy Peter, pretty good arms but that's it really, don't understand all the magazine covers, we've got a local guy from here in St. Louis named Mark Erpelding who totally destroys Peter but doesn't get anywhere near the coverage.

Peter has great shape with few imbalances to his physique. He's winning, beating guys like Mark and Dixion at the '06 USAs, on his overall look/package/condition. Arms are good... he's probably got one of the best set of legs in amatuer ranks.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Azure on October 12, 2007, 08:53:59 PM
I think they are cute.

I don't know about two competitors in the same house though.  You need ONE sane person.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Ron on October 12, 2007, 09:56:52 PM
Peter is always nice, always cool. Jessica has always been nice, and very cool in person too.  She was the competitor on the Olympia poster.  These two are smart, look good, and work hard to get publicized like you should.  Epic jealousy on people since these two get lots of publicity.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: corinth on October 13, 2007, 03:10:18 PM
Peter is always nice, always cool. Jessica has always been nice, and very cool in person too.  She was the competitor on the Olympia poster.  These two are smart, look good, and work hard to get publicized like you should.  Epic jealousy on people since these two get lots of publicity.


We're not jealous of Peter because be gets publicity. We're pissed because he gets publicity and judging gifts over much more deserving bodybuilders. Period. 

Add onto that the holier than thou attitude and it all adds up to one annoying as fuck 170 lb bleach blonde crossed eyed midget.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: The Squadfather on October 13, 2007, 04:21:29 PM
Peter has great shape with few imbalances to his physique. He's winning, beating guys like Mark and Dixion at the '06 USAs, on his overall look/package/condition. Arms are good... he's probably got one of the best set of legs in amatuer ranks.
no offense but both Mark Erpelding and Charles Dixon destroy him.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: gh15 on October 13, 2007, 06:06:26 PM
This is a pic of Peter before he competed and completely clean. I also know that he was clean when he qualifed for nationals weighing in the mid-160's.

stop with this bunch of balonie already,,that dude is on juice from the moment he went into the track team in ohio or whereever he was,,why are you all bunch of fools? i sit here for 2 years almost explain you how this world of bodybuilding and sports in general works and you still tell me bullcrap about natural clean and other shit you expect to hear from a guy that enter the gym first day,,enough already

99% OF ATHLETES ARE ON HORMONES,,THE ONES WHO ARE NOT DONT GET NO WHERE,,ITS BEEN LIKE THAT SINCE 70S IN A MASS QUANTITIES

no you dont win no show clean,,you lose much muscle clean that many dont even train or train a lot less as in 2-4 days a week! if you train you are workin very limited and never maintain hardness and muscle mass,,you can maintain fat% but always get softer and lose some muscle mass,,,that is when you are clean! clean guys dont get on stage! natural guys are all dead as in 1940 dead,,

yes you can be natural but you will be 5'7 going on stage 147lb at even then you will be steppin on at over 6%,,that is natural,,clean is 10-20 lb over your natural weight,,anything else is HORMONIZED

WE ARE ALL HORMONIZED,,reason that le let you be is because you cant chase 1 million users,,,some of them are very respected members of society,,some of them are good people with health problems ,,some of them people that are very lonely and insecure,,,some of them handicupps,,you cant go in every house and bust them all and that is why you dont touch them,,they are not murderers,,they are every day people athletes and none athletes all use ,,as long as its done for personal use no one touches them,,alwys been this way always will be this way

Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: bigdumbbell on October 13, 2007, 09:57:10 PM
i love the way you spell  it's so sexy
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: TooPowerful4u on October 13, 2007, 11:42:21 PM
stop with this bunch of balonie already,,that dude is on juice from the moment he went into the track team in ohio or whereever he was,,why are you all bunch of fools? i sit here for 2 years almost explain you how this world of bodybuilding and sports in general works and you still tell me bullcrap about natural clean and other shit you expect to hear from a guy that enter the gym first day,,enough already

99% OF ATHLETES ARE ON HORMONES,,THE ONES WHO ARE NOT DONT GET NO WHERE,,ITS BEEN LIKE THAT SINCE 70S IN A MASS QUANTITIES

no you dont win no show clean,,you lose much muscle clean that many dont even train or train a lot less as in 2-4 days a week! if you train you are workin very limited and never maintain hardness and muscle mass,,you can maintain fat% but always get softer and lose some muscle mass,,,that is when you are clean! clean guys dont get on stage! natural guys are all dead as in 1940 dead,,

yes you can be natural but you will be 5'7 going on stage 147lb at even then you will be steppin on at over 6%,,that is natural,,clean is 10-20 lb over your natural weight,,anything else is HORMONIZED

WE ARE ALL HORMONIZED,,reason that le let you be is because you cant chase 1 million users,,,some of them are very respected members of society,,some of them are good people with health problems ,,some of them people that are very lonely and insecure,,,some of them handicupps,,you cant go in every house and bust them all and that is why you dont touch them,,they are not murderers,,they are every day people athletes and none athletes all use ,,as long as its done for personal use no one touches them,,alwys been this way always will be this way



Out of pure curiosity (because i know the truth, whether most people like it or not)... but do you think Layne Norton natural?  Hes 5'10 200 on stage... and hes as strong if not stronger than i am...at a pretty young age... thoughts?
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: bigdumbbell on October 14, 2007, 11:51:57 AM
stop with this bunch of balonie already,,that dude is on juice from the moment he went into the track team in ohio or whereever he was,,why are you all bunch of fools? i sit here for 2 years almost explain you how this world of bodybuilding and sports in general works and you still tell me bullcrap about natural clean and other shit you expect to hear from a guy that enter the gym first day,,enough already

99% OF ATHLETES ARE ON HORMONES,,THE ONES WHO ARE NOT DONT GET NO WHERE,,ITS BEEN LIKE THAT SINCE 70S IN A MASS QUANTITIES

no you dont win no show clean,,you lose much muscle clean that many dont even train or train a lot less as in 2-4 days a week! if you train you are workin very limited and never maintain hardness and muscle mass,,you can maintain fat% but always get softer and lose some muscle mass,,,that is when you are clean! clean guys dont get on stage! natural guys are all dead as in 1940 dead,,

yes you can be natural but you will be 5'7 going on stage 147lb at even then you will be steppin on at over 6%,,that is natural,,clean is 10-20 lb over your natural weight,,anything else is HORMONIZED

WE ARE ALL HORMONIZED,,reason that le let you be is because you cant chase 1 million users,,,some of them are very respected members of society,,some of them are good people with health problems ,,some of them people that are very lonely and insecure,,,some of them handicupps,,you cant go in every house and bust them all and that is why you dont touch them,,they are not murderers,,they are every day people athletes and none athletes all use ,,as long as its done for personal use no one touches them,,alwys been this way always will be this way


gh15 sweetie, the last paragraph tells us you are not familiar with U.S. laws, U.S. rules of criminal procedure and individual state laws on this subject because they do vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction consequently in the UNITED states.  hope this helps.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Tre on October 14, 2007, 12:14:13 PM
They're a couple of religious kooks. 

Would you turn your life over to Jesus if it meant getting to tap that?

Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Tre on October 14, 2007, 12:20:40 PM
These two are smart, look good, and work hard to get publicized like you should.  Epic jealousy on people since these two get lots of publicity.

What sort of 'work' are they doing to get so much publicity compared to so many others in the industry?

"Why them?" is the question many of the critics are asking.

They're cool with me, so I have no beef with them, but surely some of the fan questions are reasonable. 
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: MAXX on October 14, 2007, 12:23:43 PM
Out of pure curiosity (because i know the truth, whether most people like it or not)
are you saying that Layne is not natural?
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Van_Bilderass on October 14, 2007, 07:12:21 PM
Out of pure curiosity (because i know the truth, whether most people like it or not)... but do you think Layne Norton natural?  Hes 5'10 200 on stage... and hes as strong if not stronger than i am...at a pretty young age... thoughts?
He has commented on Layne before, said he was on lots of orals, anti-estrogens etc, IIRC.

And what is your "truth" and how do you know for sure?
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: gh15 on October 14, 2007, 07:16:34 PM
gh15 sweetie, the last paragraph tells us you are not familiar with U.S. laws, U.S. rules of criminal procedure and individual state laws on this subject because they do vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction consequently in the UNITED states.  hope this helps.

you dont need to eb femiliar with anything only common sense and since paranoia is in the blood of every bodybuilder someone needs to give them relaxation pill,,the goverment cant go after each and every one who is using personal use of hormones because it is in the millions,,if you do this to joe a you got to do same to joe b and there is no interest or need or time or any other reason in the world for the goverment to do it unless you are a BIG DEALER MAINLY UNDERGROUND GARBAGE LABS IN USA THAT POISION PEOPLE,,AND OR BIG NAME ATHLETE,,

step back a second and think about it,,,,goverment will go chase some kid who got 300 worth  personal use from 10 diff ips threw his computer to the sea or moved it to friends or this or that million options,,goverment knows it very well,,goverment dotn waste even 10 seconds thinking about the personal user only the big problem the core! thats how it works my friend,,

giverment dont go from house to house apartment to apartment wherer 10 diff people lived there by the time they find where it is and look for joey kinky for buying 300 worth of garbage that posion him,,that joey will have enough troubles later in life and medical bills,,goverment go for core problems

you got guys that walk with a stick that order,,girls that have kids that order to stay pretty and fit,,kids that order with out their parents know,,you knock on the door and an handicup guy open the door for you what you gonna do gonna take him to jail for 300? it doesnt work this way my friend if it worked this way the real criminal would be walking the street freely and 100s of thousands of people would sit in jail for doing weed and i actually support the weed jail thing but even that doesnt happen because you as goverment look for one and only one thing:

cutting the HEADS OF THE SNAKE wether it is small or big it got to be head not tail,,when head is cut tail is gone,,any personal users that get arrested for hormone use got long criminal sheet behind them and recreational drug usage and posession

Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Van_Bilderass on October 14, 2007, 07:17:10 PM
are you saying that Layne is not natural?
Nah, I'm sure he means Layne is 100% lifetime natural.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Matt C on October 14, 2007, 07:26:54 PM
There are a few guys over 6', and several guys at a "normal" 5' 10" or 5' 11".

And 5'9 and 1/2?  ???

(http://www.bodybuildingpro.com/2007mrolympia/5.jpg)

Discuss.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: 20inch calves on October 14, 2007, 07:41:50 PM
hey gh 15 ........slow down. your spelling is getting so bad i can't understand what you are saying anymore.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: bigdumbbell on October 14, 2007, 07:53:16 PM
you dont need to eb femiliar with anything only common sense and since paranoia is in the blood of every bodybuilder someone needs to give them relaxation pill,,the goverment cant go after each and every one who is using personal use of hormones because it is in the millions,,if you do this to joe a you got to do same to joe b and there is no interest or need or time or any other reason in the world for the goverment to do it unless you are a BIG DEALER MAINLY UNDERGROUND GARBAGE LABS IN USA THAT POISION PEOPLE,,AND OR BIG NAME ATHLETE,,

step back a second and think about it,,,,goverment will go chase some kid who got 300 worth  personal use from 10 diff ips threw his computer to the sea or moved it to friends or this or that million options,,goverment knows it very well,,goverment dotn waste even 10 seconds thinking about the personal user only the big problem the core! thats how it works my friend,,

giverment dont go from house to house apartment to apartment wherer 10 diff people lived there by the time they find where it is and look for joey kinky for buying 300 worth of garbage that posion him,,that joey will have enough troubles later in life and medical bills,,goverment go for core problems

you got guys that walk with a stick that order,,girls that have kids that order to stay pretty and fit,,kids that order with out their parents know,,you knock on the door and an handicup guy open the door for you what you gonna do gonna take him to jail for 300? it doesnt work this way my friend if it worked this way the real criminal would be walking the street freely and 100s of thousands of people would sit in jail for doing weed and i actually support the weed jail thing but even that doesnt happen because you as goverment look for one and only one thing:

cutting the HEADS OF THE SNAKE wether it is small or big it got to be head not tail,,when head is cut tail is gone,,any personal users that get arrested for hormone use got long criminal sheet behind them and recreational drug usage and posession



in New York State for example we have Rockefeller Drug laws passed 30 years ago by legislature and you get same sentence for crack coke as powder coke and put away for a long time which is filling jails with drug addicts and no room for violent criminals. weed you get sentenced to years too.  but cross state line to vermont and you can grow it in your back yard.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Old-Skool on October 14, 2007, 08:21:58 PM
gh15......you need to take a deep breath..push away from your comp...and go for a nice walk with some herbal tea and think "happy"thoughts..... ;)
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: davidpaul on October 15, 2007, 04:37:59 AM
gh15 is a cyborg
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: TooPowerful4u on October 15, 2007, 08:38:18 AM
Nah, I'm sure he means Layne is 100% lifetime natural.

No im saying he IS.  I just wanted to hear GH try to say he wasnt so we could all call his bs on it
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: nycbull on October 15, 2007, 08:56:52 AM
I hear the guy and wife that recently got busted in New York  for dealing steroids out of their Golds Gym both got 10 years, and the wife had no record at all.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Van_Bilderass on October 15, 2007, 09:01:49 AM
No im saying he IS.  I just wanted to hear GH try to say he wasnt so we could all call his bs on it
OK, I'm definitely interested in what you know. If he has lied to all the kids on bb.com who think he is a hero he should be busted.

Are you talking about prohormones or what?
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: michael arvilla on October 15, 2007, 10:58:39 AM
I gotta save this thread!!!!
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: michael arvilla on October 15, 2007, 10:59:29 AM
 ;)
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: 240 is Back on October 15, 2007, 11:01:56 AM
I think Jessica cleared his name pretty well in this post to GH15

Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: fakeblood on October 15, 2007, 12:20:24 PM
STOP POSTING STUFF ABOUT THOSES 2 MORONS!!!

  THEY BOTH SUCK AND ARE LIL PEOPLE!!!!

THEY GO BY THE LORDS YET BOTH PILL AND INJECT UP ON DRUGS!!!!

THATS JUST WRONG,

HORRIBLE PHYSIQUES!!!!!

AND MAKE SHITTY COVERS!!!

GROSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: The Squadfather on October 15, 2007, 12:22:01 PM
STOP POSTING STUFF ABOUT THOSES 2 MORONS!!!

  THEY BOTH SUCK AND ARE LIL PEOPLE!!!!

THEY GO BY THE LORDS YET BOTH PILL AND INJECT UP ON DRUGS!!!!

THATS JUST WRONG,

HORRIBLE PHYSIQUES!!!!!

AND MAKE SHITTY COVERS!!!

GROSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS


hi "akers".
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Pete Nice on October 15, 2007, 04:07:27 PM
I would love to blow a nice warm load all over Jessica Paxson's sexy face
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: The Squadfather on October 15, 2007, 04:12:30 PM
I would love to blow a nice warm load all over Jessica Paxson's sexy face
she's pretty hot, no doubt about it.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: just_a_pilgrim on October 15, 2007, 05:42:14 PM
stop with this bunch of balonie already,,that dude is on juice from the moment he went into the track team in ohio or whereever he was,,why are you all bunch of fools? i sit here for 2 years almost explain you how this world of bodybuilding and sports in general works and you still tell me bullcrap about natural clean and other shit you expect to hear from a guy that enter the gym first day,,enough already

99% OF ATHLETES ARE ON HORMONES,,THE ONES WHO ARE NOT DONT GET NO WHERE,,ITS BEEN LIKE THAT SINCE 70S IN A MASS QUANTITIES

no you dont win no show clean,,you lose much muscle clean that many dont even train or train a lot less as in 2-4 days a week! if you train you are workin very limited and never maintain hardness and muscle mass,,you can maintain fat% but always get softer and lose some muscle mass,,,that is when you are clean! clean guys dont get on stage! natural guys are all dead as in 1940 dead,,

yes you can be natural but you will be 5'7 going on stage 147lb at even then you will be steppin on at over 6%,,that is natural,,clean is 10-20 lb over your natural weight,,anything else is HORMONIZED

WE ARE ALL HORMONIZED,,reason that le let you be is because you cant chase 1 million users,,,some of them are very respected members of society,,some of them are good people with health problems ,,some of them people that are very lonely and insecure,,,some of them handicupps,,you cant go in every house and bust them all and that is why you dont touch them,,they are not murderers,,they are every day people athletes and none athletes all use ,,as long as its done for personal use no one touches them,,alwys been this way always will be this way



ok see GH15 i know you are a very smart guy but how much experience do you have with people who have trained naturally? I'm not saying i have but since i stopped using 4 years ago i have not lost any muscle and have increased my level a little along with muscle maturity and quality, making me look much bigger. Maybe i'm different in that i had a better base than 99% of juicers who start juicing way too early and so i hold the muscle much easier, but i still hold it naturally and no-one thinks i am clean.

I agree with you 99% are hormonized, some can do it if they have the knowledge and dedication. But you don't see many, especially in your line of work ;)
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Al-Gebra on October 15, 2007, 05:54:51 PM
I would love to blow a nice warm load all over Jessica Paxson's sexy face

she's a bimbo for jesus.

he would be so proud of the lust she seeks to incite.  :D
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: gh15 on October 15, 2007, 05:58:49 PM
ok see GH15 i know you are a very smart guy but how much experience do you have with people who have trained naturally? I'm not saying i have but since i stopped using 4 years ago i have not lost any muscle and have increased my level a little along with muscle maturity and quality, making me look much bigger. Maybe i'm different in that i had a better base than 99% of juicers who start juicing way too early and so i hold the muscle much easier, but i still hold it naturally and no-one thinks i am clean.

I agree with you 99% are hormonized, some can do it if they have the knowledge and dedication. But you don't see many, especially in your line of work ;)

once you touch hormones you are a different type of physiqe,,what you do with it is up to you ,,how much you invest in improving it is up to you,,your genetic strengths will show their best on hormones and it is up to you to bring up the weak parts,,never the lesss the moment you went on hormones even if for a month! will give you big advantage on true naturals,,

i didnt say that clean lifters cant look good because some do look very good because they work consistently on their body for years with or with out hormones you will find them in the gym adapting to the situation at hand and adapting their training routine around hormone use,,but yet they are always keep consistency and their breaks are short if at all,,

those are the ones who look good w\even when they are clean couple months with zero hormones,,yes they lose 5-10lb but the muscle is there ,,proportions are there symetry is there ,,waist get smaller because less water bloat,,so sometimes they even look somewhat better for the girls,,but never the less those lifters have good number of years under their belt and are very good at adapting their training around circumstances
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Cap on October 15, 2007, 06:08:08 PM
once you touch hormones you are a different type of physiqe,,what you do with it is up to you ,,how much you invest in improving it is up to you,,your genetic strengths will show their best on hormones and it is up to you to bring up the weak parts,,never the lesss the moment you went on hormones even if for a month! will give you big advantage on true naturals,,

i didnt say that clean lifters cant look good because some do look very good because they work consistently on their body for years with or with out hormones you will find them in the gym adapting to the situation at hand and adapting their training routine around hormone use,,but yet they are always keep consistency and their breaks are short if at all,,

those are the ones who look good w\even when they are clean couple months with zero hormones,,yes they lose 5-10lb but the muscle is there ,,proportions are there symetry is there ,,waist get smaller because less water bloat,,so sometimes they even look somewhat better for the girls,,but never the less those lifters have good number of years under their belt and are very good at adapting their training around circumstances
So do you think that a natural can gain muscle, provided there is a strong diet, doing volume routines like the ones seen in the 1970's?
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: gh15 on October 15, 2007, 06:11:46 PM
ofcourse natural can gain muscle,, but it will be very very slow progress at a max of about 7 lb a year if genetically gifted,,in reality this progress stops after 2-3 years of training and you are get to your genetic limit wether it is 175 or 185 or 202 is depending on your height and how fat you are

but yes naturals can gain muscle ofcourse they can ,,you are not dead by any means,,its just not remotely close to hormonized lifters
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Cap on October 15, 2007, 06:15:02 PM
ofcourse natural can gain muscle,, but it will be very very slow progress at a max of about 7 lb a year if genetically gifted,,in reality this progress stops after 2-3 years of training and you are get to your genetic limit wether it is 175 or 185 or 202 is depending on your height and how fat you are

but yes naturals can gain muscle ofcourse they can ,,you are not dead by any means,,its just not remotely close to hormonized lifters
Do they have to follow the low volume routines like they are constantly told because the natural body cannot recover the same way that someone on hormones does?
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: just_a_pilgrim on October 15, 2007, 06:21:19 PM
Yes after three years i bottomed out strength and size wise. Trained the 4th and tried more rest and less exercises but it didn't change anything. After three years i would have been a decent 200 pounds but now i'm a very hard 200 pounds which was the difference hormones and time made.

The reason i don't believe hormones is the answer to everything is i see plenty of guys in my gym who have been going for years and look years behind me. They obviously don't have the dedication either.

Peter Putman looks good but he always reminds me of that Dick Tracy villain 'The Brow'.

(http://www.comicspage.com/dicktracy/villains/v-brow.gif)
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: gh15 on October 15, 2007, 06:31:35 PM
Do they have to follow the low volume routines like they are constantly told because the natural body cannot recover the same way that someone on hormones does?

no but you have to listen to your body more! a lot more than when hormonized,,you also need to restrain yoruself from ego movements and super heavy weight that you see your juiced up friend doing,,you also have to be good on diet and on sleep and combine both high rep and low rep ,,if i was completely natural lifter i would concentrate more on couple muscles worked same session rather than one or two muscles like hormonized lifter usually do,,
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Cap on October 15, 2007, 06:35:53 PM
no but you have to listen to your body more! a lot more than when hormonized,,you also need to restrain yoruself from ego movements and super heavy weight that you see your juiced up friend doing,,you also have to be good on diet and on sleep and combine both high rep and low rep ,,if i was completely natural lifter i would concentrate more on couple muscles worked same session rather than one or two muscles like hormonized lifter usually do,,
That sounds like a good plan.  Thanks.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Shraded on October 15, 2007, 06:38:48 PM
of course natural can gain muscle,, but it will be very very slow progress at a max of about 7 lb a year if genetically gifted,,in reality this progress stops after 2-3 years of training and you are get to your genetic limit wether it is 175 or 185 or 202 is depending on your height and how fat you are

but yes naturals can gain muscle of course they can ,,you are not dead by any means,,its just not remotely close to hormonized lifters

I tapped out at 197.. 3 going on 4 years stuck at this weight...  i think gains for me are pretty much dead naturally
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: WOOO on October 15, 2007, 06:38:51 PM
For once something that inst negative about bodybuilding

no kidding
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Palpatine Q on October 15, 2007, 06:42:26 PM
I'm late on this thread but the basic gist is that this guy is claiming natty?!!?

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=160319.0;attach=204112;image)

HaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!!
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: tweeter on October 15, 2007, 07:08:40 PM
I'm late on this thread but the basic gist is that this guy is claiming natty?!!?

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=160319.0;attach=204112;image)

HaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!!
Not in that photo, just in this one...But of course, GH15 assures us that he has been juicing since preschool.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Al-Gebra on October 15, 2007, 07:13:24 PM

so anybody know the story behind his losing an eye?
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Andre Nickatina on October 15, 2007, 07:15:57 PM
so anybody know the story behind his losing an eye?
apparently he got shot by something...

Probably less dramatic though... like a weedeater or lawnmower accident lol
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: affy on October 15, 2007, 07:17:02 PM
so anybody know the story behind his losing an eye?
he was shot when he was a child i think

couldn't he get a better prosthetic...i have a friend with a fake eye and its amazingly real.

anyways...no need to make fun of something he can't control...his wife is a hot piece of ass though
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Al-Gebra on October 15, 2007, 07:17:48 PM
apparently he got shot by something...

Probably less dramatic though... like a weedeater or lawnmower accident lol

haha . . . when you're that short, mowing the lawn is a dangerous endeavor.

hey, do you know where the Dina-fitjess thread is?
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Al-Gebra on October 15, 2007, 07:18:42 PM
he was shot when he was a child i think

couldn't he get a better prosthetic...i have a friend with a fake eye and its amazingly real.

anyways...no need to make fun of something he can't control...his wife is a hot piece of ass though

she said it was a drive-by . . .

so someone did a drive-by w a bb gun?
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Al-Gebra on October 15, 2007, 09:54:02 PM
Just feel like I should jump in here guys. I know we all like to give people a hard time on here, and I admit I am guilty of this too. But its a little different for me in this situation because I do know Peter and Jessica. I mean its one thing when we are making fun of people like Kamali or Derek Anthony, because they come on here and ask for it. Peter has hardly ever posted here, except to say positive stuff. And even if you guys don't agree with his placings, its not like it was his fault or he had anything to do with the judging. Therefore regardless of your opinion of his physique, this is no reason to not like Peter and bash him personally. And in regards to his eye...as others have mentioned before, he was shot by a high-powered pellet gun in a random drive by shooting when he was 9. You really don't even notice it that much in person; I think sometimes pictures make it more obvious due to lighting, etc. And as far as Jessica PM'ing GH15, I think she has the right to stand up for herself and Peter when he says that Peter was obviously juicing in that pic. Personally, I think it is ridiculous to try to come to the conclusion that he was hormonized based on that photo. I know that Peter was a very good athlete and competed in wresting, football, and track. Just from personal experience, Peter and Jessica are some of the nicest people you will meet. They are always very talkative, friendly, and more than willing to give out advice. This is more than you can say about alot of people in the bodybuilding world. I know I will probably get flamed for this, but just felt I should say something.

1. good use of paragraphs.

2. jessica comes off as a confrontational, holier-than-thou beeyatch on these boards.

3. it's annoying to have people call themselves christians . . . when they're engaged in exactly the same narcissistic pursuits as the rest of us.  can she flaunt herself any more?
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: just_a_pilgrim on October 15, 2007, 09:54:17 PM
Just feel like I should jump in here guys. I know we all like to give people a hard time on here, and I admit I am guilty of this too. But its a little different for me in this situation because I do know Peter and Jessica. I mean its one thing when we are making fun of people like Kamali or Derek Anthony, because they come on here and ask for it. Peter has hardly ever posted here, except to say positive stuff. And even if you guys don't agree with his placings, its not like it was his fault or he had anything to do with the judging. Therefore regardless of your opinion of his physique, this is no reason to not like Peter and bash him personally. And in regards to his eye...as others have mentioned before, he was shot by a high-powered pellet gun in a random drive by shooting when he was 9. You really don't even notice it that much in person; I think sometimes pictures make it more obvious due to lighting, etc. And as far as Jessica PM'ing GH15, I think she has the right to stand up for herself and Peter when he says that Peter was obviously juicing in that pic. Personally, I think it is ridiculous to try to come to the conclusion that he was hormonized based on that photo. I know that Peter was a very good athlete and competed in wresting, football, and track. Just from personal experience, Peter and Jessica are some of the nicest people you will meet. They are always very talkative, friendly, and more than willing to give out advice. This is more than you can say about alot of people in the bodybuilding world. I know I will probably get flamed for this, but just felt I should say something.

While you're talking do you know where that Dina thread is? I'm dying to read this i love reading what devoted Christians have to say about infidels.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Al-Gebra on October 15, 2007, 09:55:53 PM
While you're talking do you know where that Dina thread is? I'm dying to read this i love reading what devoted Christians have to say about infidels.

it's been deleted . . . just like ms. whiny princess has had about 8 of my threads deleted in the last 24 hours.
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Matt C on October 16, 2007, 04:41:51 AM
Let me chime in here...in response to this thread and the one which surfaced around the time of the Olympia.

For anyone who has made fun of Peter's eye in this thread or any other, that is extremely rude.  He lost his eye in an accident when he was nine for crying out loud.  Have some compassion.  :-\

Some of you take it too far, even for getbig.

As far as comments about Peter getting higher placings due to favouritism...well duh.  ::)  Is it some kind of conspiracy that better looking people are looked at as more intelligent and get more out of life than their less attractive peers (all else being equal)?  It is just reality - deal with it.  I think Peter can do well in the pro ranks and qualify for the Olympia one day.  He will get looked at more positively due to his marketability, and I'm not saying that's fair, I'm just saying that's life.  He is world class either way.

I met Peter online a couple of years ago and he has always been polite to me.  I met him in person at Gold's Gym Sahara and he invited myself and my friends out with him and the crew from FLEX magazine to the Black Angus Steakhouse.  I've heard comments that he kisses the judges asses, but I don't think it's ever occurred to some people that maybe (just maybe) he's just a nice guy.  Why was he so nice to me and my friends for instance?  He owes me NOTHING.  And other than a little online promotion, what can I do for him?  Not much.  It's obvious to me he is just a genuinely nice person.

As for Jessica, I spoke with her briefly at the Olympia.  I haven't followed her posts here, but in person she is polite and seems to just be sticking up for her man.  Sometimes people do or say irrational things to people who are attacking those they love.  I can't say I blame her.  She is also the picture of beauty.  Peter is very lucky, or maybe luck has nothing to do with it.  :)

(http://www.bodybuildingpro.com/2007mrolympia/3.jpg)
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: bigdumbbell on October 16, 2007, 05:52:17 AM
1. good use of paragraphs.

2. jessica comes off as a confrontational, holier-than-thou beeyatch on these boards.

3. it's annoying to have people call themselves christians . . . when they're engaged in exactly the same narcissistic pursuits as the rest of us.  can she flaunt herself any more?

bump hof honesty
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: michael arvilla on October 16, 2007, 07:40:18 AM
Who's the guy in the "Wifebeater" ?!?!?!?!?!?!?
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Matt C on October 16, 2007, 08:51:34 PM
Who's the guy in the "Wifebeater" ?!?!?!?!?!?!?

haha, that's me.  We were training at Gold's right before the picture was taken and I didn't have a change of clothes since I wasn't expecting to go out right away.  :)
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Mclovin on October 16, 2007, 08:53:08 PM
haha, that's me.  We were training at Gold's right before the picture was taken and I didn't have a change of clothes since I wasn't expecting to go out right away.  :)
Good to see Peter showing supporting the TN. Where are these pics from Matt?
Title: Re: Peter and Jessica Putnam in the News!
Post by: Matt C on October 16, 2007, 09:00:12 PM
Good to see Peter showing supporting the TN. Where are these pics from Matt?

The Black Angus Steakhouse down the street from the Sahara Gold's in Las Vegas.  :)