Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Bluto on August 08, 2007, 02:52:50 PM

Title: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: Bluto on August 08, 2007, 02:52:50 PM
 ???
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: wisconsinBB on August 08, 2007, 02:53:30 PM
No, coleman does.  Next Please.
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: 2big4u on August 08, 2007, 04:05:59 PM
NO BUT HE DOES HAVE THE LARGEST SHOULDERS AND CHEST.
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: HERACLES on August 08, 2007, 05:35:03 PM
Uhh, no...

How would you really know? He is synthol ridden...
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: Camel Jockey on August 08, 2007, 05:37:02 PM
Ronnie and Mustafa.
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: CARTEL on August 08, 2007, 05:39:46 PM
Squadfather seems to think that Bob Chick does.
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: ChillZ on August 08, 2007, 05:41:24 PM
Branch Warren has the freakiest legs bar none. Quadrasaurus
It used to be Paul Demayo r.i.p
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: CARTEL on August 08, 2007, 05:42:16 PM
Platz.
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: columbusdude82 on August 08, 2007, 05:45:57 PM
Brewer.
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: BIG DUB on August 08, 2007, 09:36:08 PM
nasser at his best.
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: KillerMonk on August 08, 2007, 09:48:13 PM
If calves are part of the leg then Ronnies loses out.
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: Bluto on August 09, 2007, 12:56:39 AM
marcus ruhls thighs are 36 inches!!!

branchs are only 33 inches!!!

Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: webcake on August 09, 2007, 01:14:00 AM
Mate your being way too generous with those measurements. Branch doesn't have 33 inch quads and Ruhl doesn't have 36. Ronnies are probably the biggest and they are around 34 inches.
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: Bluto on August 09, 2007, 01:20:00 AM
measurements are straight outta md!!! the issue where branch and marcus meet to train legs!

branch "no idea what they used to be, but ive measured them at 33 inches not too long ago"

marcus "i dont know what they used to be either. but right before the last olympia they were 85 centimeters - so 33 inches. now i am 340 pounds and they are 92 centimeters - thats 36 inches"

marcus ruhl on calves:

"when i started training mine they were just 35 centimeters. right now they are 56 centimeters" (thats 22 inches)
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: webcake on August 09, 2007, 01:38:40 AM
Well if we are talking off season then yes i can imagine those measurements are fairly close. Obviously they would lose some size, but don't get me wrong i'm a huge Ruhl fan and he does have MASSIVE legs. Looking foward to the olympia, Marcus said he aims to come in at 295 LBS!!! :o
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: musclehedz on August 09, 2007, 04:29:07 AM
Uhh, no...

How would you really know? He is synthol ridden...

Explains the freaky triceps.
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: WOOO on August 09, 2007, 05:06:27 AM
???


terrible excuse for a post
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: DSM18 on August 09, 2007, 05:29:03 AM
Vince G
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: wisconsinBB on August 09, 2007, 08:26:40 AM
Brewer.

Bigger than Ronnie's?  We all know how much you love trey,but try to be a little more realistic.
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: BEAST 8692 on August 09, 2007, 08:27:33 AM
artwood
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: Meso_z on August 09, 2007, 08:42:46 AM
Watch near the and of the clip...

2Ephp%3Ft%3D11749
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: Bossa on August 09, 2007, 08:49:12 AM
all those claims are BS...Mark Henry at his peak of powerlifting weighing over 400 lbs  had 35" legs...and he had alot of fat to go along w/ the muscle
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: wisconsinBB on August 09, 2007, 08:50:32 AM
Watch near the and of the clip...

2Ephp%3Ft%3D11749

Thank you, that video should clear up any confusion.
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: mesmorph78 on August 09, 2007, 08:52:46 AM
shame about the triceps tho   :-\
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: BEAST 8692 on August 09, 2007, 08:56:59 AM
Watch near the and of the clip...

2Ephp%3Ft%3D11749

must get pretty boring having to count every fucking rep of a typical coleman leg workout. :-\
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: Bluto on August 09, 2007, 09:49:42 AM

terrible excuse for a post

why's that? we're not allowed to discuss size and strength in bodybuilders legs? i must admit i had to click on your name, for 3700 posts ive never seen you post before. are you hiding in the hulkster thread or something?
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: IceCold on August 09, 2007, 10:23:46 AM
dont calves count as legs?


Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: gymguy on August 09, 2007, 10:57:14 AM
No, Coleman and Branch easily beat him.
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: Sir William Idol on August 09, 2007, 11:20:02 AM
paco
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: Bluto on August 09, 2007, 01:46:09 PM
No, Coleman and Branch easily beat him.

so when they're both being interview when training legs, and ruhl says he got 36 and branch says he got 33, you dont think branch would object?
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: BEAST 8692 on August 12, 2007, 09:19:00 AM
so when they're both being interview when training legs, and ruhl says he got 36 and branch says he got 33, you dont think branch would object?

what's he going to say?

"liar liar, pants on fire" ???

i have no doubt markus' legs are bigger than branch's. he's got a much bigger frame and is taller for one thing.
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: bmuscle90 on August 12, 2007, 09:22:58 AM
markus ruhl. not just his legs but his whole build is much bigger than most pros.
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: Benny B on August 12, 2007, 09:29:43 AM
A fat Ruhl at 340? Perhaps.

In contest condition? Ronnie Coleman.
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: Hulkster on August 12, 2007, 10:10:23 AM
dont calves count as legs?




only if you have no idea what you are talking about...

we are talking about LEGS as in quads/hams in terms of circumference.

not calves you moron.

hahahahaha :P
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: ChillZ on June 11, 2008, 05:34:54 PM
Branch Warren has the sickest legs bar none.  The late Paul Demayo had crazy wheels.

from the younger dudes out there, Trey Brewer
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: webcake on June 11, 2008, 05:37:51 PM
Branch Warren has the sickest legs bar none.  The late Paul Demayo had crazy wheels.

from the younger dudes out there, Trey Brewer

bump old threads much ::)
Title: Re: does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????
Post by: monstercalves on June 11, 2008, 05:47:41 PM
only if you have no idea what you are talking about...

we are talking about LEGS as in quads/hams in terms of circumference.

not calves you moron.

hahahahaha :P


lmao........why do competitive bodybuilders train calves then if they are not part of the legs or a bodypart at all for that matter?