Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Captain Slin on October 05, 2007, 11:32:28 AM
-
Look at the difference! The conditioniong is out of this world in one while the other one looks like they are off? They even look more muscular in the better version... hmmmmm.....
-
its called increasing the contrast in photoshop, the light gray areas become whiter and the dark grey areas become darker, thus popping out the muscle. Thats why comparing photographs is not as good as seeing the real thing.
-
its called increasing the contrast in photoshop, the light gray areas become whiter and the dark grey areas become darker, thus popping out the muscle. Thats why comparing photographs is not as good as seeing the real thing.
I can see that!Ive never seen this version of the 93 O though... its incredibly different! Which one do you think is more accurate?
-
Yes, cause everyone knows bb contests are judged by pics. They gather all the bbs, snap some posing photos, develop the film, gather in room and look at the pics and determine the next Mr. Olympia.
-
the bottom pic is from muscle and fitness for the 93 o. all the shots in that one look like that. no photoshop back then.
-
I can see that!Ive never seen this version of the 93 O though... its incredibly different! Which one do you think is more accurate?
the first one, its blurry but I think more accurate overall.
-
the bottom pic is from muscle and fitness for the 93 o. all the shots in that one look like that. no photoshop back then.
Even the 93 video looks like the bottom shot.
-
what a crazy difference.... it makes me wonder even MORE how things look back at any conest.
-
the bottom pic is from muscle and fitness for the 93 o. all the shots in that one look like that. no photoshop back then.
Right I scanned that bottom pic from Muscle & Fitness !
-
Right I scanned that bottom pic from Muscle & Fitness !
do you have a comparison of all the shots in that show from muscletime? or wherever they get their stuff and the m n f pics??
-
look at shawn rays abs and flex wheelers back! :o :o :o
the difference in conditioning is like night and day...!
-
do you have a comparison of all the shots in that show from muscletime? or wherever they get their stuff and the m n f pics??
Same shot from a slightly different angle
-
upper body looks pretty much the same.
but look from the waist down :o
glutes more ripped hamstrings MUCH bigger and more lean looking.
-
Look at the difference! The conditioniong is out of this world in one while the other one looks like they are off? They even look more muscular in the better version... hmmmmm.....
Dorian is just crazy in that top photo.
-
the bottom pic is from muscle and fitness for the 93 o. all the shots in that one look like that. no photoshop back then.
First version of photoshop was released in 89-90. I'm pretty sure the mags used other photo editing/enhancing methods before photoshop became the standard as well.
-
Photo shop or know photoshop the three of those schmoes have some seriously syntholed up calves.
-
Photo shop or know photoshop the three of those schmoes have some seriously syntholed up calves.
oh god no way bro.. no synthol in any of those shots.. i love how everyone is calling synthol in every pic nowadays lol
-
Photo shop or know photoshop the three of those schmoes have some seriously syntholed up calves.
you are tripping if you think yates calves are full of oil. shawn should have been second at that show.
-
cue for stupid Icecold to rant about how they are fake..
oh wait, - these pics are of dorian.
he will claim they are perfectly real..
only dorian-kicking Ronnie screencaps can be faked.. ::)
what a fucking retard... :-\
-
THis is why pictures will never replace actually being there, in person and close to the stage....
-
THis is why pictures will never replace actually being there, in person and close to the stage....
exactly...this is why my progressive pics will never do me justice on here...but i'll put some up anyway!
-
They are actually different pics taken at tlsightly different angles. Look closely at the competitors in the background. You can even see them standing slightly differently. Angles plus different lenses make all the difference.
-
They are actually different pics taken at tlsightly different angles. Look closely at the competitors in the background. You can even see them standing slightly differently. Angles plus different lenses make all the difference.
SLIGHTLY different angles... but the pictures are still very different.
-
It's the lighting that makes them look different. In the top picture the photographer used an on camera flash which washes out the detail, while in the bottom pic only the stage lighting was used which is much more natural and dramatic. The lighting makes all the difference, shoot the pic right in the first place and you won't need to mess with photoshop.
-
THis is why pictures will never replace actually being there, in person and close to the stage....
Thank you Chic ! Great post !
-
Thank you Chic ! Great post !
translated---"ooooh, put it on my face Chick, I like it on my face"
hahahahaa