its called increasing the contrast in photoshop, the light gray areas become whiter and the dark grey areas become darker, thus popping out the muscle. Thats why comparing photographs is not as good as seeing the real thing.
I can see that!Ive never seen this version of the 93 O though... its incredibly different! Which one do you think is more accurate?
the bottom pic is from muscle and fitness for the 93 o. all the shots in that one look like that. no photoshop back then.
Right I scanned that bottom pic from Muscle & Fitness !
do you have a comparison of all the shots in that show from muscletime? or wherever they get their stuff and the m n f pics??
Look at the difference! The conditioniong is out of this world in one while the other one looks like they are off? They even look more muscular in the better version... hmmmmm.....
Photo shop or know photoshop the three of those schmoes have some seriously syntholed up calves.
THis is why pictures will never replace actually being there, in person and close to the stage....
They are actually different pics taken at tlsightly different angles. Look closely at the competitors in the background. You can even see them standing slightly differently. Angles plus different lenses make all the difference.
