Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Misc Discussion Boards => Sports Discussion Boards => Topic started by: MidniteRambo on December 07, 2007, 08:18:08 AM

Title: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: MidniteRambo on December 07, 2007, 08:18:08 AM
Out of nine statistical categories, Bynum beats Shaq in five, with one category tied (blocks).  This appears to validate Dr. Buss's decision not to give Shaq a long term extension which would have fiscally handicapped the team for many years for a declining player.

Shaq:

Minutes: 27:48
FG %: 59.1
FT %: 47.7
Reb.: 7.7
Assists: 1.1
TO: 2.8
Blk: 1.8
PF: 3.8
PPG: 15.0

Bynum

Minutes: 25:53
FG %: 58.1
FT %: 68.5
Reb.:   9.6
Assists: 1.4
TO: 1.3
Blk: 1.8
PF: 3.2
PPG: 10.4
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Faust on December 07, 2007, 11:00:42 AM
what's PF?
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Quickerblade on December 07, 2007, 12:59:59 PM
what's PF?
personal fouls :-\
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: MidniteRambo on December 07, 2007, 01:23:18 PM
personal fouls :-\

Cool avatar.  A classic.
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Faust on December 07, 2007, 01:47:17 PM
haha, shaq still can't hit 50% from the free throw line...

Bynum's numbers look decent, but no star quality. Shaq is fading
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: MidniteRambo on December 07, 2007, 01:51:37 PM
haha, shaq still can't hit 50% from the free throw line...

Bynum's numbers look decent, but no star quality. Shaq is fading

The guy just turned 20 and is averaging very close to a double-double in 25 minutes per game.  I think he has star potential at the very least.
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: ATHEIST on December 07, 2007, 03:53:13 PM
  sure but your taking one athlete who is physically able to do more than another at this point in both their careers. compare the two at the same stage of their careers. would you take Shaq in his prime? or take Bynums potential?

   or Dwight Howard = man beast
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: MidniteRambo on December 07, 2007, 03:57:06 PM
  sure but your taking one athlete who is in the physically able to do more than another at this point in both their careers. compare the two at the same stage of their careers. would you take Shaq in his prime? or take Bynums potential?

   or Dwight Howard = man beast

But I think my point was that Dr. Buss recognized that Shaq would not be a good long term investment, and it was better to find a young center with some potential that could do the same as an aging Shaq for less cash

Conceded: Bynum is not Shaq in his prime, but neither is Howard . . .
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: CARTEL on December 07, 2007, 04:59:45 PM
But I think my point was that Dr. Buss recognized that Shaq would not be a good long term investment, and it was better to find a young center with some potential that could do the same as an aging Shaq for less cash

Conceded: Bynum is not Shaq in his prime, but neither is Howard . . .

Shaq did help Wade win a Championship since he left. Being frugal didn't bring Buss a championship. Just a bunch of role players and a superstar malcontent that doesn't want to be there.
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: MidniteRambo on December 07, 2007, 07:32:06 PM
True- but the crucial questions are- (1) do you take 1 championship to doom your franchise for five years and (2) would Shaq have shown the same dedication to get in shape and be productive as a Laker.  I cannot answer the first question, but the second question is a resounding "NO".
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: CARTEL on December 07, 2007, 09:23:12 PM
True- but the crucial questions are- (1) do you take 1 championship to doom your franchise for five years and (2) would Shaq have shown the same dedication to get in shape and be productive as a Laker.  I cannot answer the first question, but the second question is a resounding "NO".

Yes you do. I'd rather have a championship and then 5 bad years than have 10 years of solid basketball with no ring.

And Shaq has never really been in shape. It was the rift between him and Kobe that prevented them from having more Championships.
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Dos Equis on December 07, 2007, 11:46:22 PM
But I think my point was that Dr. Buss recognized that Shaq would not be a good long term investment, and it was better to find a young center with some potential that could do the same as an aging Shaq for less cash

Conceded: Bynum is not Shaq in his prime, but neither is Howard . . .

I agree.  Good decision by Buss. 

The comparison should be Bynum at year 3 with Shaq at year 3.  Shaq wins.  I don't know if Bynum will ever be like Shaq was in his prime (probably not), but he has shown potential this year. 
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Dos Equis on December 07, 2007, 11:48:54 PM
Shaq did help Wade win a Championship since he left. Being frugal didn't bring Buss a championship. Just a bunch of role players and a superstar malcontent that doesn't want to be there.

Not really.  The Heat won in spite of, not because of Shaq--with a whole let of help from the refs.  D-Whistle got Michael Jordan treatment. 

Shaq was awful in the playoffs and the finals during that championship run.

I do agree the Lakers need some major help.  They better get Kobe some help.   :-\ 
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Dos Equis on December 07, 2007, 11:51:08 PM
Yes you do. I'd rather have a championship and then 5 bad years than have 10 years of solid basketball with no ring.

And Shaq has never really been in shape. It was the rift between him and Kobe that prevented them from having more Championships.

This is true.  Although I blame Shaq for most of it, they were both stupid.  They could have won another ring if they brought everybody back the next year (Shaq, Kobe, Malone, etc.).  Too bad. 

Shaq is done now anyway.   
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Quickerblade on December 08, 2007, 12:23:13 AM
This is true.  Although I blame Shaq for most of it, they were both stupid.  They could have won another ring if they brought everybody back the next year (Shaq, Kobe, Malone, etc.).  Too bad. 

Shaq is done now anyway.   
he is, but he did go 6 for 6 against golden state till riley benched him.
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Dos Equis on December 08, 2007, 01:56:19 AM
he is, but he did go 6 for 6 against golden state till riley benched him.

He can still dominate for about a half a quarter or so.  Riley has been pulling him because he is a liability.   
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Quickerblade on December 08, 2007, 02:34:48 AM
He can still dominate for about a half a quarter or so.  Riley has been pulling him because he is a liability.   
Shaq can be a back up, but the Ego will not let him..he dont wanna be like hakeem and ewing at the end of there career
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: MidniteRambo on December 08, 2007, 11:11:02 AM
Good above the board sports conversation. Thanks guys.
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Dos Equis on December 08, 2007, 11:40:10 AM
Shaq can be a back up, but the Ego will not let him..he dont wanna be like hakeem and ewing at the end of there career

Yep.  I'm not even sure his body will let him continue.   
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Dos Equis on December 08, 2007, 11:40:56 AM
Good above the board sports conversation. Thanks guys.

I agree.  This is a good board.  Body does a great job. 
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Quickerblade on December 08, 2007, 11:48:46 AM
Yep.  I'm not even sure his body will let him continue.   
Shaq does ok for 1 and half quarters, but who else is there to back up, Alonzo?? his good, in better condition than shaq and blocks shots but his real slow too..
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Dos Equis on December 08, 2007, 12:09:03 PM
Shaq does ok for 1 and half quarters, but who else is there to back up, Alonzo?? his good, in better condition than shaq and blocks shots but his real slow too..

True.  He can play hard for about a half at most.  Zo is actually a decent backup.
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Quickerblade on December 08, 2007, 12:49:52 PM
True.  He can play hard for about a half at most.  Zo is actually a decent backup.
(http://www.givemetherock.com/images/grizzlies/lawrence_roberts_alonzo_mourning.jpg)
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Dos Equis on December 09, 2007, 09:24:30 PM
Bynum played about the best game of his career tonight against Golden State.  Looked very good.  I was impressed.  His line:

20 points, 6 rebounds, 8 assists, 0 steals, 5 blocks, 0 fouls

If he keeps improving he is going to be a force.  He is starting to develop a little mean streak, which he was missing last year.   
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: MidniteRambo on December 10, 2007, 10:11:33 AM
Bynum played about the best game of his career tonight against Golden State.  Looked very good.  I was impressed.  His line:

20 points, 6 rebounds, 8 assists, 0 steals, 5 blocks, 0 fouls

If he keeps improving he is going to be a force.  He is starting to develop a little mean streak, which he was missing last year.   

I think Bynum had 11 rebounds with 3 assists



Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: jerseyhurricane on December 10, 2007, 10:32:20 AM
As a sixer fan...I would trade 1 championship year for 10 bad ones. We're gonna be bad anyway might as well have at least one championship year in there somewhere.
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Dos Equis on December 11, 2007, 10:12:37 AM
I think Bynum had 11 rebounds with 3 assists


Correct.  I was looking at part of Kobe's stats.  Thanks. 
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Dos Equis on December 16, 2007, 10:22:26 AM
Bynum on Friday against Golden State:

17 points, 16 rebounds, 2 assists, 1 block, 0 steals, 1 turnover, 1 foul

The kid is really playing well.  I'm impressed. 
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: MidniteRambo on December 16, 2007, 11:22:35 AM
Bynum on Friday against Golden State:

17 points, 16 rebounds, 2 assists, 1 block, 0 steals, 1 turnover, 1 foul

The kid is really playing well.  I'm impressed. 

Me too.

Do you think Kobe feels bad for throwing Bynum under the bus during the summer?
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Dos Equis on December 16, 2007, 11:39:28 AM
Me too.

Do you think Kobe feels bad for throwing Bynum under the bus during the summer?

Maybe.  I'm still not certain they wouldn't have been better off with Kidd instead of Bynum.  But ask me again in about four or five months.   :) 

In his defense, he didn't intend for his comments about "shipping him out" for Kidd to be public, and Bynum had not done much at all before this season. 
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Quickerblade on December 16, 2007, 12:13:22 PM
Do you guys think Shaq will retire at seasons end this year??? i can guarantee they will not make the playoffs..If he cared for the team he would retire or else lose his dignity in having the owner buy his contract out
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Dos Equis on December 16, 2007, 12:44:23 PM
It wouldn't surprise me if he went down with an injury before season's end and then quit when the season is over.

Miami can't justify paying him $20 mil for what he is bringing to the table. 
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Dos Equis on December 17, 2007, 09:51:52 AM
Bynum looked great again last night.  Played against Kaman of the Clippers, who is playing better than any center in the NBA right now.  Controlled the paint.  He is starting to realize how dominant he can be.  His line:

14 points, 8 rebounds, 3 assists, 1 steal, 6 blocks, 2 turnovers, 4 fouls
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: MidniteRambo on December 17, 2007, 02:05:00 PM
Bynum looked great again last night.  Played against Kaman of the Clippers, who is playing better than any center in the NBA right now.  Controlled the paint.  He is starting to realize how dominant he can be.  His line:

14 points, 8 rebounds, 3 assists, 1 steal, 6 blocks, 2 turnovers, 4 fouls

Cool.  You've turned this into a Bynum Update thread.  Thanks!
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Dos Equis on December 22, 2007, 10:07:45 AM
I think we are seeing the emergence of a dominant big man.  A few nights ago against Cleveland, he had 17 and 11, but missed two free throws with seconds left in the game and the Lakers down by two. 

He rebounded against the Knicks yesterday with the following:

24 points (career high on 10-11 shooting), 11 rebounds, 3 assists, 0 steals, 1 block, 2 turnovers, and 0 fouls.   :o 

I have to say that Kobe gets a little credit for this.  Bynum used Kobe's "ship him out" comments as motivation:

Bryant also smiled when asked about the infamous amateur parking-lot video in which he said Bynum should have been shipped out of town for All-Star guard Jason Kidd.

"It seemed to have lit a fire under [him]," Bryant said without a trace of rancor. "It's awesome."

. . .

Bynum, who turned 20 two months ago, said he considered the amateur-video case to be closed when he and Bryant talked the first day of training camp. Of course, winning and playing well tend to ease any lingering tension.
 
"I think it's just that he respects more how I worked this summer, and during the season, he sees me going into the weight room," he said. "He just doesn't like if he doesn't see people working hard."


http://www.latimes.com/sports/basketball/nba/lakers/la-sp-lakers22dec22,1,2733261.story?coll=la-headlines-sports-nba-lakers
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: MidniteRambo on December 22, 2007, 11:32:53 AM
I think we are seeing the emergence of a dominant big man.  A few nights ago against Cleveland, he had 17 and 11, but missed two free throws with seconds left in the game and the Lakers down by two. 

He rebounded against the Knicks yesterday with the following:

24 points (career high on 10-11 shooting), 11 rebounds, 3 assists, 0 steals, 1 block, 2 turnovers, and 0 fouls.   :o 

I have to say that Kobe gets a little credit for this.  Bynum used Kobe's "ship him out" comments as motivation:

Bryant also smiled when asked about the infamous amateur parking-lot video in which he said Bynum should have been shipped out of town for All-Star guard Jason Kidd.

"It seemed to have lit a fire under [him]," Bryant said without a trace of rancor. "It's awesome."

. . .

Bynum, who turned 20 two months ago, said he considered the amateur-video case to be closed when he and Bryant talked the first day of training camp. Of course, winning and playing well tend to ease any lingering tension.
 
"I think it's just that he respects more how I worked this summer, and during the season, he sees me going into the weight room," he said. "He just doesn't like if he doesn't see people working hard."


http://www.latimes.com/sports/basketball/nba/lakers/la-sp-lakers22dec22,1,2733261.story?coll=la-headlines-sports-nba-lakers


When he had 18 points, 7 rebounds in the first half I was even more amazed.  Soon, hopefully he will be putting entire games together like that.
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Dos Equis on December 25, 2007, 10:07:04 PM
Another career day for Bynum:  28 points (11 for 13), 12 rebounds, 4 assists, and 2 blocks in a win against the Suns.  I'm starting to get a little excited about my Lakers. 
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Dos Equis on January 05, 2008, 10:54:00 AM
After two subpar performances in a row, the young man puts up another career high against Philly last night:  "Andrew Bynum dominated inside with 17 points, a career-high 16 rebounds and three blocks to lead the Lakers, going 6-of-8 from the field."  http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/recap?gameId=280104013
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Quickerblade on January 05, 2008, 11:53:20 AM
shaq has aleadygiven up on the team, i bet he will sit out till the all-star break
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Dos Equis on January 17, 2008, 10:26:12 AM
Bynum out for 8 weeks.   :'(  He was really playing great basketball.  Lakers tied for best record in the Western Conference.  Dang. 
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Dos Equis on January 20, 2008, 10:38:48 AM
Kobe on Bynum (right after Bynum's injury):  "We're a championship-caliber team with him in the lineup."
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Quickerblade on January 26, 2008, 08:20:37 PM
bynum is doing well hope he recovers and picks up where he left off.
Title: Bynum to Be Back for Regular Season
Post by: MidniteRambo on May 22, 2008, 11:58:59 AM
Good news for Lakers fans, bad news for the rest of the league

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylt=AiK13wfJte2fCCW8friPa7i8vLYF?slug=ap-lakers-bynumsurgery&prov=ap&type=lgns
Title: Re: Bynum to Be Back for Regular Season
Post by: Dos Equis on May 22, 2008, 09:27:37 PM
Good news for Lakers fans, bad news for the rest of the league

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylt=AiK13wfJte2fCCW8friPa7i8vLYF?slug=ap-lakers-bynumsurgery&prov=ap&type=lgns

Great news, but it would have been nice if they figured this out four months ago. 
Title: Re: Bynum to Be Back for Regular Season
Post by: Quickerblade on May 22, 2008, 09:48:19 PM
Great news, but it would have been nice if they figured this out four months ago. 
exactly, its good there not rushing him, like what miami did with wade, but yeah they probably dont want to bring him in since there in sync
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Tre on May 23, 2008, 01:33:15 AM

Thankfully, the guys are performing exceptionally well in his absence, but never a good omen when your 20-year-old future franchise player is having knee surgery.
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Dos Equis on June 07, 2008, 09:51:00 PM
I like this kid.   :)

"It's definitely going to be special," he said. "It'll be my first time playing with Pau [Gasol]. I think once we get that combination going, I can't see anybody stopping us. I think we're going to try and chase the Bulls' record."

Chicago set an NBA record by going 72-10 in 1995-96.

http://www.latimes.com/sports/printedition/la-sp-lakersfyi6-2008jun06,0,7904789.story
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Quickerblade on June 07, 2008, 10:08:30 PM


I think we're going to try and chase the Bulls' record.


Keep thinking Bynum.. and beach if you believe they will beat the record i'll do a paypal bet with you.
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Dos Equis on June 07, 2008, 10:33:57 PM
Keep thinking Bynum.. and beach if you believe they will beat the record i'll do a paypal bet with you.

Oh no.  I only make about one bet a year and I'm still weighing my 2008 options.   :)  I only recently paid off my 2007 bet.  Bet my son that the Niners would have a better record than the Eagles.  Cost me a Teddy's Bigger Burgers lunch.  (Best veggie burgers in town.)

I don't know if they'll get more than 72, but a healthy Bynum will make them very tough to beat.   
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: Quickerblade on June 08, 2008, 12:50:34 AM
Oh no.  I only make about one bet a year and I'm still weighing my 2008 options.   :)  I only recently paid off my 2007 bet.  Bet my son that the Niners would have a better record than the Eagles.  Cost me a Teddy's Bigger Burgers lunch.  (Best veggie burgers in town.)

I don't know if they'll get more than 72, but a healthy Bynum will make them very tough to beat.   

Cmon $50 bet, well you got to before the season starts to accept.
Title: Re: Shaq versus Bynum
Post by: CARTEL on June 09, 2008, 10:30:41 AM

I don't know if they'll get more than 72, but a healthy Bynum will make them very tough to beat.   


Maybe in a different era.

Not in todays West they won't get 72 games.

That's not a knock on the Lakers, that is just props to the overall depth of the West.