Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: littleguns on January 25, 2008, 01:20:52 PM

Title: Bobby Lashley
Post by: littleguns on January 25, 2008, 01:20:52 PM
Anyone know why this monster is no longer with WWE


Awesome physique
Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: The Squadfather on January 25, 2008, 01:22:10 PM
dude had a big upper body for sure.
Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: Camel Jockey on January 25, 2008, 01:23:07 PM
dude had a big upper body for sure.

His legs were pretty huge too non-bbing wise.
Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: columbusdude82 on January 25, 2008, 01:25:27 PM
Anyone know why this monster is no longer with WWE


Awesome physique

He got sick of starring in your wet dreams.

Hope this helps.
Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: The Squadfather on January 25, 2008, 01:25:36 PM
His legs were pretty huge too non-bbing wise.
yeah they were good sized but it seems like they lagged behind his upper, probably because his upper body was so huge.
Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: Audioslave on January 25, 2008, 01:29:40 PM
2008

On the forum of his official website, Lashley announced that he had left WWE. He clarified his comments by contacting Ryan Gray of the WrestlingNewsWorld website, claiming that he did not want to leave WWE, but had to due to circumstances beyond his control. He also stated that he was now training for a career in Mixed Martial Arts.[29]
Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: MCWAY on January 25, 2008, 01:32:55 PM
Anyone know why this monster is no longer with WWE


Awesome physique

I thought he was just sidelined, due to injury.
Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: jtsunami on January 25, 2008, 01:43:23 PM
prolly steroid related
Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: aussiepro on January 25, 2008, 04:04:47 PM
i heard it was also a injury, and that he'd be out for about 9 months or so.. that might just be horse shit though
Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: AVBG on January 25, 2008, 04:19:58 PM
drug issues (for a fact)
Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: tweeter on January 25, 2008, 05:38:36 PM
yeah they were good sized but it seems like they lagged behind his upper, probably because his upper body was so huge.
Seems like most wrestlers are that way...atleast in comparison to bodybuilders
Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: gmflex on January 25, 2008, 08:04:54 PM
He probably failed the WWE wellness program :-\
I think they stated a 3 strike your out rule :o
Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: mass 04 on January 25, 2008, 08:07:19 PM
He probably failed the WWE wellness program :-\
I think they stated a 3 strike your out rule :o
::)
Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: arce377 on January 26, 2008, 02:17:31 AM
Cool...he has a great amt. wrest. pedigree...
Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: gordiano on January 26, 2008, 02:26:08 AM
prolly steroid related

Yep.

drug issues (for a fact)

Yep.

And since WWE is in hot water right now, in regards to "drugs", well, Lashley is one of the victims....
Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: delta9mda on January 26, 2008, 10:52:56 AM
bobby could go to tna and make some $$$$$$$$
Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: flexingtonsteele on January 26, 2008, 11:11:48 AM
just talked to dave meltzer, and it is not drug related, i couldnt get much more info than that, but it has nothing to do with the wellness policy. Even though he has failed one test
Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: littleguns on January 26, 2008, 01:46:40 PM
Lashley was one of their untouchables.....he would never have been fired due to drug issues...just like Batista..how does this guy avoid the testing....
Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: MCWAY on January 26, 2008, 02:54:32 PM
i heard it was also a injury, and that he'd be out for about 9 months or so.. that might just be horse shit though

Not necessarily. A lot of wrestlers have been mangled up in recent years.

Batista (tricep)
Mark Henry (knee)
Undertaker (bicep)
Mysterio (knee)
Edge (pec)
Lashley (shoulder)
Cena (pec)
Kennedy (shoulder)


Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: G.O.A.T. on January 26, 2008, 05:06:18 PM
Seems like most wrestlers are that way...atleast in comparison to bodybuilders
It's becuase they couldn't move like they need to if they had huge legs. Not only that, they travel and do house shows many days out of the week. If you trained legs hard, you would be miserably sore and would be even slower. It's not they can't get big legs, it's more like they don't want them. I think Bob Holly has/had some pretty big quads for a wrestler.
Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: MCWAY on January 26, 2008, 05:30:07 PM
It's becuase they couldn't move like they need to if they had huge legs. Not only that, they travel and do house shows many days out of the week. If you trained legs hard, you would be miserably sore and would be even slower. It's not they can't get big legs, it's more like they don't want them. I think Bob Holly has/had some pretty big quads for a wrestler.

We always read in the muscle magazines that taller bodbuilders have trouble filling out their legs. Most of the wrestlers mentioned are well over 6 feet tall. Batista is listed at 6'5"; Lashley is 6'3". That, plus the agility thing you mentioned, would explain why those wrestlers don't have "big" legs (compared to bodybuilders, at least). Batista's quads are fairly decent, if you ask me.

Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: G.O.A.T. on January 26, 2008, 09:11:02 PM
We always read in the muscle magazines that taller bodbuilders have trouble filling out their legs. Most of the wrestlers mentioned are well over 6 feet tall. Batista is listed at 6'5"; Lashley is 6'3". That, plus the agility thing you mentioned, would explain why those wrestlers don't have "big" legs (compared to bodybuilders, at least). Batista's quads are fairly decent, if you ask me.


Good Point as well.
Title: Re: Bobby Lashley
Post by: MisterGX on January 27, 2008, 12:03:22 PM
Lashley was one of their untouchables.....he would never have been fired due to drug issues...just like Batista..how does this guy avoid the testing....

He doesn't avoid any testing.  Batista just doesn't fail a test..