Author Topic: Bobby Lashley  (Read 2838 times)

littleguns

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4183
Bobby Lashley
« on: January 25, 2008, 01:20:52 PM »
Anyone know why this monster is no longer with WWE


Awesome physique

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #1 on: January 25, 2008, 01:22:10 PM »
dude had a big upper body for sure.

Camel Jockey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16711
  • Mel Gibson and Bob Sly World Domination
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #2 on: January 25, 2008, 01:23:07 PM »
dude had a big upper body for sure.

His legs were pretty huge too non-bbing wise.

columbusdude82

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6896
  • I'm too sexy for my shirt!!!
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #3 on: January 25, 2008, 01:25:27 PM »
Anyone know why this monster is no longer with WWE


Awesome physique

He got sick of starring in your wet dreams.

Hope this helps.

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #4 on: January 25, 2008, 01:25:36 PM »
His legs were pretty huge too non-bbing wise.
yeah they were good sized but it seems like they lagged behind his upper, probably because his upper body was so huge.

Audioslave

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 337
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #5 on: January 25, 2008, 01:29:40 PM »
2008

On the forum of his official website, Lashley announced that he had left WWE. He clarified his comments by contacting Ryan Gray of the WrestlingNewsWorld website, claiming that he did not want to leave WWE, but had to due to circumstances beyond his control. He also stated that he was now training for a career in Mixed Martial Arts.[29]

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19327
  • Getbig!
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #6 on: January 25, 2008, 01:32:55 PM »
Anyone know why this monster is no longer with WWE


Awesome physique

I thought he was just sidelined, due to injury.

jtsunami

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 7067
  • I support Bigbobs
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #7 on: January 25, 2008, 01:43:23 PM »
prolly steroid related
TEAM Nasser

aussiepro

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 797
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #8 on: January 25, 2008, 04:04:47 PM »
i heard it was also a injury, and that he'd be out for about 9 months or so.. that might just be horse shit though
there's no magic pills... just needles

AVBG

  • Guest
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #9 on: January 25, 2008, 04:19:58 PM »
drug issues (for a fact)

tweeter

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2180
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #10 on: January 25, 2008, 05:38:36 PM »
yeah they were good sized but it seems like they lagged behind his upper, probably because his upper body was so huge.
Seems like most wrestlers are that way...atleast in comparison to bodybuilders

gmflex

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7036
  • The Empire lives...you rebel scum!!!
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #11 on: January 25, 2008, 08:04:54 PM »
He probably failed the WWE wellness program :-\
I think they stated a 3 strike your out rule :o

mass 04

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11039
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #12 on: January 25, 2008, 08:07:19 PM »
He probably failed the WWE wellness program :-\
I think they stated a 3 strike your out rule :o
::)

arce377

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2551
  • ARCE DO SAN MARTIALARTS SCHOOL
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #13 on: January 26, 2008, 02:17:31 AM »
Cool...he has a great amt. wrest. pedigree...
ARCE
DOSAN DOJO

gordiano

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17124
  • TEAM "CUTE PENIS", TEAM TRIFLIN' RONNIE COLEMAN
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #14 on: January 26, 2008, 02:26:08 AM »
prolly steroid related

Yep.

drug issues (for a fact)

Yep.

And since WWE is in hot water right now, in regards to "drugs", well, Lashley is one of the victims....
HAHA, RON.....

delta9mda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • Team Pussy Claad/ ya know I'm sayin?
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #15 on: January 26, 2008, 10:52:56 AM »
bobby could go to tna and make some $$$$$$$$

flexingtonsteele

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5653
  • The new age pussy Punisher!
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #16 on: January 26, 2008, 11:11:48 AM »
just talked to dave meltzer, and it is not drug related, i couldnt get much more info than that, but it has nothing to do with the wellness policy. Even though he has failed one test

littleguns

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4183
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #17 on: January 26, 2008, 01:46:40 PM »
Lashley was one of their untouchables.....he would never have been fired due to drug issues...just like Batista..how does this guy avoid the testing....

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19327
  • Getbig!
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #18 on: January 26, 2008, 02:54:32 PM »
i heard it was also a injury, and that he'd be out for about 9 months or so.. that might just be horse shit though

Not necessarily. A lot of wrestlers have been mangled up in recent years.

Batista (tricep)
Mark Henry (knee)
Undertaker (bicep)
Mysterio (knee)
Edge (pec)
Lashley (shoulder)
Cena (pec)
Kennedy (shoulder)



G.O.A.T.

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 247
  • TEAM LESNAR
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #19 on: January 26, 2008, 05:06:18 PM »
Seems like most wrestlers are that way...atleast in comparison to bodybuilders
It's becuase they couldn't move like they need to if they had huge legs. Not only that, they travel and do house shows many days out of the week. If you trained legs hard, you would be miserably sore and would be even slower. It's not they can't get big legs, it's more like they don't want them. I think Bob Holly has/had some pretty big quads for a wrestler.
TEAM LESNAR

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19327
  • Getbig!
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #20 on: January 26, 2008, 05:30:07 PM »
It's becuase they couldn't move like they need to if they had huge legs. Not only that, they travel and do house shows many days out of the week. If you trained legs hard, you would be miserably sore and would be even slower. It's not they can't get big legs, it's more like they don't want them. I think Bob Holly has/had some pretty big quads for a wrestler.

We always read in the muscle magazines that taller bodbuilders have trouble filling out their legs. Most of the wrestlers mentioned are well over 6 feet tall. Batista is listed at 6'5"; Lashley is 6'3". That, plus the agility thing you mentioned, would explain why those wrestlers don't have "big" legs (compared to bodybuilders, at least). Batista's quads are fairly decent, if you ask me.


G.O.A.T.

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 247
  • TEAM LESNAR
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #21 on: January 26, 2008, 09:11:02 PM »
We always read in the muscle magazines that taller bodbuilders have trouble filling out their legs. Most of the wrestlers mentioned are well over 6 feet tall. Batista is listed at 6'5"; Lashley is 6'3". That, plus the agility thing you mentioned, would explain why those wrestlers don't have "big" legs (compared to bodybuilders, at least). Batista's quads are fairly decent, if you ask me.


Good Point as well.
TEAM LESNAR

MisterGX

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1002
  • Getbig!
Re: Bobby Lashley
« Reply #22 on: January 27, 2008, 12:03:22 PM »
Lashley was one of their untouchables.....he would never have been fired due to drug issues...just like Batista..how does this guy avoid the testing....

He doesn't avoid any testing.  Batista just doesn't fail a test..