Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Misc Discussion Boards => Religious Debates & Threads => Topic started by: Necrosis on May 10, 2008, 08:55:31 AM
-
give me your thoughts
does this not show you how ignorant ben stein and creationsists are?
-
&feature=related
all of them are great. LOL
-
&feature=related
brutal pwnage of stupid kent hovind. the dumbest man alive, and biggest liar ive witnessed.
-
&feature=related
another one on the most common logical fallacy creationists make.
-
Go smoke a pole.
-
Go smoke a pole.
\
how are you today?
-
Ha ha ha, I love how they put up Hitlers pics with the creationist dudes. Classic. 8)
-
give me your thoughts
does this not show you how ignorant ben stein and creationsists are?
Actually if you are going by the reaction of a crowd Ben Stein holds his own each and every time and so does Hovind. If 9-10 think he is ignorant then he would be ignorant, but clearly this isn't the case. It's your opinion that he is ignorant, however you'r entitled to your own opinion. :)
-
Actually if you are going by the reaction of a crowd Ben Stein holds his own each and every time and so does Hovind. If 9-10 think he is ignorant then he would be ignorant, but clearly this isn't the case. It's your opinion that he is ignorant, however you'r entitled to your own opinion. :)
it is not my opinion, he is at odds with scientific fact which is easily disproved everytime he opens his mouth. Both cant be right, and hovind is dismissed very easisly.
he has no education and is in jail, you figure it out.
-
it is not my opinion, he is at odds with scientific fact which is easily disproved everytime he opens his mouth. Both cant be right, and hovind is dismissed very easisly.
he has no education and is in jail, you figure it out.
You"re right, he is at odds with scientific theories, not facts. And your right he is or was in jail, but your comment was about ignorance and only people that believe in evolution would consider him ignorant, clearly a biased opinion. The Apostle Paul was also in jail and he is consider by people living in hundreds of countries to be a very important in all of history so what is there to figure out.
-
You"re right, he is at odds with scientific theories, not facts. And your right he is or was in jail, but your comment was about ignorance and only people that believe in evolution would consider him ignorant, clearly a biased opinion. The Apostle Paul was also in jail and he is consider by people living in hundreds of countries to be a very important in all of history so what is there to figure out.
a theory is a collection of facts for all intensive purposes,like the theory of evolution contains many facts.
for example his bit on radiometric dating was easily disproved, his argument about origins as if it applies to evolution is a strawman, he cant even grasp the simple laws of thermodynamics.
his description of the big bang is flat out wrong and is more complex then anyone on this board could understand.
-
You"re right, he is at odds with scientific theories, not facts. And your right he is or was in jail, but your comment was about ignorance and only people that believe in evolution would consider him ignorant, clearly a biased opinion. The Apostle Paul was also in jail and he is consider by people living in hundreds of countries to be a very important in all of history so what is there to figure out.
You sir, I have the feeling, very much typify the musclebound bodybuilder with an IQ of approximately 85, do you not?
-
You sir, I have the feeling, very much typify the musclebound bodybuilder with an IQ of approximately 85, do you not?
What makes you say that
-
What makes you say that
Your writing style for one is indicative of that; moreover the general direction of the thoughts you express seem to allude to that very distinct possibility.
-
Your writing style for one is indicative of that; moreover the general direction of the thoughts you express seem to allude to that very distinct possibility.
Writing means nothing in a post. My typing skills are 2 words per minute and I limit my time on the computer daily so excuse me if I make a thousands spelling mistakes, but I am a competitive bodybuilder so maybe You're smater then me because your physique probably doesn't look like mine. Also you must know that more then 3 quarters of the planet believe in a higher power or a supreme being so may your right we are all stupid :)
-
Writing means nothing in a post. My typing skills are 2 words per minute and I limit my time on the computer daily so excuse me if I make a thousands spelling mistakes, but I am a competitive bodybuilder so maybe You're smater then me because your physique probably doesn't look like mine. Also you must know that more then 3 quarters of the planet believe in a higher power or a supreme being so may your right we are all stupid :)
Yes! Your IQ = 85. Hey Deicide, do you think this reveals something about Onetimehithard? ;D
-
Yes! Your IQ = 85. Hey Deicide, do you think this reveals something about Onetimehithard? ;D
Man, you are weird ???
-
Man, you are weird ???
Debussey is a penis in the sky.
-
Writing means nothing in a post. My typing skills are 2 words per minute and I limit my time on the computer daily so excuse me if I make a thousands spelling mistakes, but I am a competitive bodybuilder so maybe You're smater then me because your physique probably doesn't look like mine. Also you must know that more then 3 quarters of the planet believe in a higher power or a supreme being so may your right we are all stupid :)
Absolutely true; those with physical genetics rarely have the mental genetics to match. Since you are a competetive bodybuilder, what do you think Jebus thinks of the Testosterone, Nandrolone and Trenbolone and all the other goodies you inject into your ass, shoulders and quads?
-
Absolutely true; those with physical genetics rarely have the mental genetics to match.
How can this be correct? Debussey = both utterly stupid (53 IQ) AND extremely weak (10,5 inch biceps).
Debussey myst have gotten some incredible bad luck in teh gene pool >:(
-
How can this be correct? Debussey = both utterly stupid (53 IQ) AND extremely weak (10,5 inch biceps).
Debussey myst have gotten some incredible bad luck in teh gene pool >:(
Northman, you are lying.... ;)
-
Northman, you are lying.... ;)
No.
>:(
-
Absolutely true; those with physical genetics rarely have the mental genetics to match. Since you are a competetive bodybuilder, what do you think Jebus thinks of the Testosterone, Nandrolone and Trenbolone and all the other goodies you inject into your ass, shoulders and quads?
i would like to see some research on this subject!!! im a pretty good size guy and athletic to boot and i am intelligent as well...i must be an anomaly then?
-
Arnold is a smart guy.
-
I am speaking of for example the Stephen Hawkings of the world. Most people have better bb genetics than he does or any other scrawny scientist. Are most people more intelligent? Clearly not.
-
I am speaking of for example the Stephen Hawkings of the world. Most people have better bb genetics than he does or any other scrawny scientist. Are most people more intelligent? Clearly not.
Dad example Hawkings is dumb ;D
-
Dad example Hawkings is dumb ;D
Why? It shows an example of something who is physically totally decrepit, yet a genius. Arnold is savvy and cunning but he is not a great thinker; there is a difference and apart from Arnold, I can't think of any top BBer that is even remotely bright.
-
Why? It shows an example of something who is physically totally decrepit, yet a genius. Arnold is savvy and cunning but he is not a great thinker; there is a difference and apart from Arnold, I can't think of any top BBer that is even remotely bright.
I was being sarcastic
-
Why? It shows an example of something who is physically totally decrepit, yet a genius. Arnold is savvy and cunning but he is not a great thinker; there is a difference and apart from Arnold, I can't think of any top BBer that is even remotely bright.
-
Does it not occure to you that someone that comes across like Hawking appears intelligent because he has devoted his entire life to study and has a passion in the field that he is in. A pro bodybuilder has a full time job as a bodybuilder; why would he appear smart, he has nothing left to exercise his brain at the end of the day. On the flip side Hawkings could've spent his whole life lifting weights and eating properly and he would have musles, but he wouldn't have as much academic achievements. your theory doesn't hold weight and comes across as rather dumb (for someone that so arrogantly is a self proclaimed intellect). Tell me then if bodybuilders are so dumb why are there 2 mr.Olympias out of eleven with phds
-
Does it not occure to you that someone that comes across like Hawking appears intelligent because he has devoted his entire life to study and has a passion in the field that he is in. A pro bodybuilder has a full time job as a bodybuilder; why would he appear smart, he has nothing left to exercise his brain at the end of the day. On the flip side Hawkings could've spent his whole life lifting weights and eating properly and he would have musles, but he wouldn't have as much academic achievements. your theory doesn't hold weight and comes across as rather dumb (for someone that so arrogantly is a self proclaimed intellect). Tell me then if bodybuilders are so dumb why are there 2 mr.Olympias out of eleven with phds
exactly not hawkings but how many ppl that you would consider "intelligent" have not devoted as much time to their physical appearance as they have to their intellect? I think its pretty stereotypical to assume that a person is more intelligent than someone else based solely on their muscle mass. I dont think the two are related in any significant sense.