Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Camel Jockey on June 17, 2008, 10:24:29 AM

Title: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Camel Jockey on June 17, 2008, 10:24:29 AM
After being scared to watch the youtube clip for a day or so I finally did so and it wasn't that surprising to me. He looks pretty average with a decent chest and okay cuts for a 40 year old.. Thing is, he'd be considered in good shape by most of the general public no matter what his age group, and especially good for a 43 year old.

It's not a huge shock to me.  ::) Dude looks like a decently cut gym rat, and not some skinny queer like Tom Prince so lay off him
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Bluto on June 17, 2008, 10:26:11 AM
epic failed attempt to avoid suicide by this team levrone member  ::)
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Mars on June 17, 2008, 10:27:49 AM
he looked great in his first pictures after his retirement but from a mass monster youd expect a better physique.
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Camel Jockey on June 17, 2008, 10:30:04 AM
He was on drugs for almost 20 years and he's now 43!

His hormonal production isn't probably very good after almost 2 decades of AAS use, and like I pointed out already he's in his 40's so..

Better shape and size than most 40 year olds.. Infact, in Hollywood he'd probably be considered in pretty good shape should he get a role.

Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Bluto on June 17, 2008, 10:30:53 AM
He was on drugs for almost 20 years and he's now 43!

His hormonal production isn't probably very good after almost 2 decades of AAS use, and like I pointed out already he's in his 40's so..

Better shape and size than most 40 year olds.. Infact, in Hollywood he'd probably be considered in pretty good shape should he get a role.



you dont know that.

stop spreading rumours.

and he's in no good shape compared to a lot of hollywood hunks

Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Camel Jockey on June 17, 2008, 10:31:41 AM
you dont know that.

stop spreading rumours.

and he's in no good shape compared to a lot of hollywood hunks



Other then the belly I'd say he's in good shape compared to a lot of actors in his age group and those even younger than him
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Bast000 on June 17, 2008, 10:33:17 AM
Ronnie Coleman is the same age
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Camel Jockey on June 17, 2008, 10:34:16 AM
Ronnie Coleman is the same age

And one massive amounts of drugs still and is ugly and distorted..

Kevin is normal and actually looks younger than you'd expect him to. I'd rather look like him than Ronnie.
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Bluto on June 17, 2008, 10:34:21 AM
Other then the belly I'd say he's in good shape compared to a lot of actors in his age group and those even younger than him

his age group is guys like brad pitt
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Camel Jockey on June 17, 2008, 10:35:00 AM
his age group is guys like brad pitt


And does Brad Pitt have a better physique than him currently? Probably not!

Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Bluto on June 17, 2008, 10:37:10 AM
And does Brad Pitt have a better physique than him currently? Probably not!



of course he does, he's brad pitt

he's always in shape

(http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b79/squarehippies/brad_pitt/brad_pitt1.jpg)
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Camel Jockey on June 17, 2008, 10:38:31 AM
of course he does, he's brad pitt

he's always in shape

(http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b79/squarehippies/brad_pitt/brad_pitt1.jpg)

Brutal posting a screen shot from 'Troy'

That movie was out like 5-6 years back  ::)
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Bluto on June 17, 2008, 10:40:35 AM
just 4 years back.

and i dont think we have reason to believe brad pitt let himself go since ?

and remember, brad pitt is no professional bodybuilder.
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Camel Jockey on June 17, 2008, 10:45:04 AM
Brad Pitt was promoting the movie 4 years back and even said he losts most of his size and conditioning and went back to smoking ciggies

Sorry Bluto  ;D
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 17, 2008, 10:47:19 AM
After being scared to watch the youtube clip for a day or so I finally did so and it wasn't that surprising to me. He looks pretty average with a decent chest and okay cuts for a 40 year old.. Thing is, he'd be considered in good shape by most of the general public no matter what his age group, and especially good for a 43 year old.

It's not a huge shock to me.  ::) Dude looks like a decently cut gym rat, and not some skinny queer like Tom Prince so lay off him

You're right he actually doesn't look that bad compared to the average 43 year old but he looks terrible compared to his onstage appearances and thats what he will always be judged by
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: bodybuilder1234 on June 17, 2008, 10:47:28 AM
dummies, the guy hasnt trained for 3-4 years.

He tried to look his worst period
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 17, 2008, 10:48:38 AM
dummies, the guy hasnt trained for 3-4 years.

He tried to look his worst period

You don't think he's trained at all? I doubt that he looks pretty good even still
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Camel Jockey on June 17, 2008, 10:50:19 AM
You don't think he's trained at all? I doubt that he looks pretty good even still

In better shape than a lot of people on this forum.

Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Team Diver on June 17, 2008, 10:55:56 AM
dummies, the guy hasnt trained for 3-4 years.

He tried to look his worst period

Someone in another thread already asked it:
Has he avoided training for 3-4 years IN ORDER TO look his worst in a 2-minute funny video?  ???
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Big L on June 17, 2008, 10:58:42 AM
at least this
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: njflex on June 17, 2008, 12:02:46 PM
pec tear is more obvios ,if he trained and ate up he could push 210/215.all speculation at this point.
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Kwon on June 17, 2008, 12:12:38 PM
Don't you think Kevrone could get back in shape if he really wanted too people?   ::)

We all know how well he responds to the supps.

If someone offered him good money to get swole again i am certain he could do it.
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Matt C on June 17, 2008, 12:15:29 PM
pec tear is more obvios ,if he trained and ate up he could push 210/215.all speculation at this point.

Easily, and in very little time.  I'm talking about a matter of weeks.  Honestly, in a matter of weeks (18-20), he could be winning pro shows again.
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: flagadajones on June 17, 2008, 12:47:03 PM
at least this

you can't even look like this without being on steroids.
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: bodybuilder1234 on June 17, 2008, 12:49:46 PM
you can't even look like this without being on steroids.

yeh, you can look better
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: bodybuilder1234 on June 17, 2008, 12:51:18 PM
You don't think he's trained at all? I doubt that he looks pretty good even still

its what he said, apparently he hasnt done weightlifting in quite a while and only does cardio.
Its probably an exagerration because I would think he atleast trains once a week
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: pumpster on June 17, 2008, 05:54:46 PM
Don't you think Kevrone could get back in shape if he really wanted too people?   ::)


Woulda coulda shoulda he looks like shit.
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Cap on June 17, 2008, 06:10:41 PM
If what he says is true then cool.  It's funny how people ride his jock as if he has to be any bigger.  Dude was already big, made his money, now he is living comfortably.
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Croatch on June 17, 2008, 06:24:37 PM
Easily, and in very little time.  I'm talking about a matter of weeks.  Honestly, in a matter of weeks (18-20), he could be winning pro shows again.
haah, Very true.
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: SAMSON123 on June 17, 2008, 10:20:29 PM
And one massive amounts of drugs still and is ugly and distorted..

Kevin is normal and actually looks younger than you'd expect him to. I'd rather look like him than Ronnie.

AHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH AHAHAH...YOU MUST REALLY LOOK LIKE SHIT TO THINK HE LOOKS OK...LEVRONE LOOKS LIKE DEATH WARMED UP!!!!!
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: IronMagazine.com on June 17, 2008, 10:27:05 PM
for his age and the fact that he probably is not lifting weights at all anymore, he looks fine... the funny thing is he could look better than 98% of people here if he dedicated himself to bodybuilding for about 12 weeks.
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: pumpster on June 17, 2008, 10:44:16 PM
Easily, and in very little time.  I'm talking about a matter of weeks.  Honestly, in a matter of weeks (18-20), he could be winning pro shows again.

Well since our wise old sage has direct experience with this, it must be true. ::)
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Jeffro on June 17, 2008, 10:46:20 PM
for his age and the fact that he probably is not lifting weights at all anymore, he looks fine... the funny thing is he could look better than 98% of people here if he dedicated himself to bodybuilding for about 12 weeks.
no the funny thing is, hes not working out at all and he looks like shit
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: IronMagazine.com on June 17, 2008, 10:51:50 PM
no the funny thing is, hes not working out at all and he looks like shit

looks like shit compared to who? lets line up 100 average 43 year old American men and make a comparison.

Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Jeffro on June 17, 2008, 10:59:46 PM
for what he could be, he looks like shit
for an average person he looks alright
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: IronMagazine.com on June 17, 2008, 11:02:11 PM
for what he could be, he looks like shit
for an average person he looks alright

what he could be? he has nothing to prove anymore and no reason to look like a bodybuilder, and obviously no desire to anymore, which is fine, and for an average 43 year he looks a lot better than just "alright".
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Jeffro on June 17, 2008, 11:06:09 PM
i know plenty of mid forties naturals that put his current physique to shame
he looks alright
i bet if you saw him in person, he would look downright small
just because he wants to pursue movies doesnt mean he has to abandon a physical lifestyle
there are many actors that are muscular that get movie roles
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: IronMagazine.com on June 17, 2008, 11:10:29 PM
i know plenty of mid forties naturals that put his current physique to shame
he looks alright
i bet if you saw him in person, he would look downright small
just because he wants to pursue movies doesnt mean he has to abandon a physical lifestyle
there are many actors that are muscular that get movie roles

I am sure you do, that was not my point, I don't really care what he looks like in person, he is his own person and can look however he wants, who the hell am I to judge? I will never achieve what he did in bodybuilding, nor will you or 99% of anyone here, or any sport for that matter.

I think he should do what ever makes him happy, and if maintaining a bodybuilder type physique, or even being cut, is not one of his priorities anymore that is fine, as far as Hollywood actors, most just get in shape for their movie roles.
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Jeffro on June 17, 2008, 11:12:55 PM
of course you and me wont look like him, because we dont want to use the massive amounts of drugs he did to achieve that look
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: schwarzenpecker on June 17, 2008, 11:16:07 PM
I am sure you do, that was not my point, I don't really care what he looks like in person, he is his own person and can look however he wants, who the hell am I to judge? I will never achieve what he did in bodybuilding, nor will you or 99% of anyone here, or any sport for that matter.

I think he should do what ever makes him happy, and if maintaining a bodybuilder type physique, or even being cut, is not one of his priorities anymore that is fine, as far as Hollywood actors, most just get in shape for their movie roles.

This is where he is blowing it. Judging by the acting he did in Redline, he should stick to roles that exploit the pro bb look (sci fi monsters, hit men for the mafia, serial killers, porno).  His acting is mediocre compared to thousands of other sag actors that don't look like they worked out a day in their lives either.
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: IronMagazine.com on June 17, 2008, 11:16:17 PM
of course you and me wont look like him, because we dont want to use the massive amounts of drugs he did to achieve that look

not in my case, I learned when I was young (I started competing as a teen) that even with massive amounts of drugs I lacked the genetics to be successful in bodybuilding.

Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: IronMagazine.com on June 17, 2008, 11:17:14 PM
This is where he is blowing it. Judging by the acting he did in Redline, he should stick to roles that exploit the pro bb look. His acting is mediocre compared to thousands of other sag actors.

you think being successful in acting, or Hollywood, is about being a good actor?
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Jeffro on June 17, 2008, 11:20:35 PM
This is where he is blowing it. Judging by the acting he did in Redline, he should stick to roles that exploit the pro bb look. His acting is mediocre compared to thousands of other sag actors.
you think being successful in acting, or Hollywood, is about being a good actor?
the thing is, hes not the best actor   maybe being bigger could get him more roles    hes not gonna get big movie roles, so why not have muscle that could make him stand out more   for example: the rock
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: pumpster on June 17, 2008, 11:21:37 PM
not in my case, I learned when I was young (I started competing as a teen) that even with massive amounts of drugs I lacked the genetics to be successful in bodybuilding.



So you're saying you also look like a sack of shit on or off, unlike Kev?
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: IronMagazine.com on June 17, 2008, 11:22:26 PM
the thing is, hes not the best actor   maybe being bigger could get him more roles    hes not gonna get big movie roles, so why not have muscle that could make him stand out more   for example: the rock

ask him, he also has a band, or used to, I guess he does what he wants to do and has his reasons, which is cool.
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: schwarzenpecker on June 17, 2008, 11:23:18 PM
you think being successful in acting, or Hollywood, is about being a good actor?

Yes, unless your a celebrity superstar which Kevin isn't. People may recognize him from old bb mags but he isn't a household name like the Rock was, but who has proven that he is a good actor, not just a body.
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: Jeffro on June 17, 2008, 11:25:38 PM
So you're saying you also look like a sack of shit on or off, unlike Kev?
you look like a sack of shit, regardless
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: IronMagazine.com on June 17, 2008, 11:25:43 PM
Yes, unless your a celebrity superstar which Kevin isn't. People may recognize him from old bb mags but he isn't a household name like the Rock was, but who has proven that he is a good actor, not just a body.

wake up call, having a certain look or the right connections, I have a very good friend that has spent his life in the business.
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: IronMagazine.com on June 17, 2008, 11:27:20 PM
So you're saying you also look like a sack of shit on or off, unlike Kev?

brilliant post.
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: schwarzenpecker on June 17, 2008, 11:31:20 PM
wake up call, having a certain look or the right connections, I have a very good friend that has spent his life in the business.

I know he had the right connections, Arnold helped him but he still has to prove he can act and he hasn't yet.
Title: Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
Post by: IronMagazine.com on June 17, 2008, 11:34:46 PM
I just meant in general, there is much more to making it in Hollywood than being able to act.