Author Topic: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43  (Read 8168 times)

bodybuilder1234

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3749
  • Manny Pacquiao KO Floyd 1
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #25 on: June 17, 2008, 12:51:18 PM »
You don't think he's trained at all? I doubt that he looks pretty good even still

its what he said, apparently he hasnt done weightlifting in quite a while and only does cardio.
Its probably an exagerration because I would think he atleast trains once a week

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #26 on: June 17, 2008, 05:54:46 PM »
Don't you think Kevrone could get back in shape if he really wanted too people?   ::)


Woulda coulda shoulda he looks like shit.

Cap

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6363
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= CSP111
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #27 on: June 17, 2008, 06:10:41 PM »
If what he says is true then cool.  It's funny how people ride his jock as if he has to be any bigger.  Dude was already big, made his money, now he is living comfortably.
Squishy face retard

Croatch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8025
  • Man up, train natural.
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #28 on: June 17, 2008, 06:24:37 PM »
Easily, and in very little time.  I'm talking about a matter of weeks.  Honestly, in a matter of weeks (18-20), he could be winning pro shows again.
haah, Very true.
N

SAMSON123

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8670
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #29 on: June 17, 2008, 10:20:29 PM »
And one massive amounts of drugs still and is ugly and distorted..

Kevin is normal and actually looks younger than you'd expect him to. I'd rather look like him than Ronnie.

AHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH AHAHAH...YOU MUST REALLY LOOK LIKE SHIT TO THINK HE LOOKS OK...LEVRONE LOOKS LIKE DEATH WARMED UP!!!!!
C

IronMagazine.com

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2761
  • IronMag Bodybuilding Blog Online Since 2001
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #30 on: June 17, 2008, 10:27:05 PM »
for his age and the fact that he probably is not lifting weights at all anymore, he looks fine... the funny thing is he could look better than 98% of people here if he dedicated himself to bodybuilding for about 12 weeks.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #31 on: June 17, 2008, 10:44:16 PM »
Easily, and in very little time.  I'm talking about a matter of weeks.  Honestly, in a matter of weeks (18-20), he could be winning pro shows again.

Well since our wise old sage has direct experience with this, it must be true. ::)

Jeffro

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3614
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #32 on: June 17, 2008, 10:46:20 PM »
for his age and the fact that he probably is not lifting weights at all anymore, he looks fine... the funny thing is he could look better than 98% of people here if he dedicated himself to bodybuilding for about 12 weeks.
no the funny thing is, hes not working out at all and he looks like shit

IronMagazine.com

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2761
  • IronMag Bodybuilding Blog Online Since 2001
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #33 on: June 17, 2008, 10:51:50 PM »
no the funny thing is, hes not working out at all and he looks like shit

looks like shit compared to who? lets line up 100 average 43 year old American men and make a comparison.


Jeffro

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3614
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #34 on: June 17, 2008, 10:59:46 PM »
for what he could be, he looks like shit
for an average person he looks alright

IronMagazine.com

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2761
  • IronMag Bodybuilding Blog Online Since 2001
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #35 on: June 17, 2008, 11:02:11 PM »
for what he could be, he looks like shit
for an average person he looks alright

what he could be? he has nothing to prove anymore and no reason to look like a bodybuilder, and obviously no desire to anymore, which is fine, and for an average 43 year he looks a lot better than just "alright".

Jeffro

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3614
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #36 on: June 17, 2008, 11:06:09 PM »
i know plenty of mid forties naturals that put his current physique to shame
he looks alright
i bet if you saw him in person, he would look downright small
just because he wants to pursue movies doesnt mean he has to abandon a physical lifestyle
there are many actors that are muscular that get movie roles

IronMagazine.com

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2761
  • IronMag Bodybuilding Blog Online Since 2001
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #37 on: June 17, 2008, 11:10:29 PM »
i know plenty of mid forties naturals that put his current physique to shame
he looks alright
i bet if you saw him in person, he would look downright small
just because he wants to pursue movies doesnt mean he has to abandon a physical lifestyle
there are many actors that are muscular that get movie roles

I am sure you do, that was not my point, I don't really care what he looks like in person, he is his own person and can look however he wants, who the hell am I to judge? I will never achieve what he did in bodybuilding, nor will you or 99% of anyone here, or any sport for that matter.

I think he should do what ever makes him happy, and if maintaining a bodybuilder type physique, or even being cut, is not one of his priorities anymore that is fine, as far as Hollywood actors, most just get in shape for their movie roles.

Jeffro

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3614
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #38 on: June 17, 2008, 11:12:55 PM »
of course you and me wont look like him, because we dont want to use the massive amounts of drugs he did to achieve that look

schwarzenpecker

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 181
  • You may have seen me at your local video store
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #39 on: June 17, 2008, 11:16:07 PM »
I am sure you do, that was not my point, I don't really care what he looks like in person, he is his own person and can look however he wants, who the hell am I to judge? I will never achieve what he did in bodybuilding, nor will you or 99% of anyone here, or any sport for that matter.

I think he should do what ever makes him happy, and if maintaining a bodybuilder type physique, or even being cut, is not one of his priorities anymore that is fine, as far as Hollywood actors, most just get in shape for their movie roles.

This is where he is blowing it. Judging by the acting he did in Redline, he should stick to roles that exploit the pro bb look (sci fi monsters, hit men for the mafia, serial killers, porno).  His acting is mediocre compared to thousands of other sag actors that don't look like they worked out a day in their lives either.

IronMagazine.com

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2761
  • IronMag Bodybuilding Blog Online Since 2001
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #40 on: June 17, 2008, 11:16:17 PM »
of course you and me wont look like him, because we dont want to use the massive amounts of drugs he did to achieve that look

not in my case, I learned when I was young (I started competing as a teen) that even with massive amounts of drugs I lacked the genetics to be successful in bodybuilding.


IronMagazine.com

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2761
  • IronMag Bodybuilding Blog Online Since 2001
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #41 on: June 17, 2008, 11:17:14 PM »
This is where he is blowing it. Judging by the acting he did in Redline, he should stick to roles that exploit the pro bb look. His acting is mediocre compared to thousands of other sag actors.

you think being successful in acting, or Hollywood, is about being a good actor?

Jeffro

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3614
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #42 on: June 17, 2008, 11:20:35 PM »
This is where he is blowing it. Judging by the acting he did in Redline, he should stick to roles that exploit the pro bb look. His acting is mediocre compared to thousands of other sag actors.
you think being successful in acting, or Hollywood, is about being a good actor?
the thing is, hes not the best actor   maybe being bigger could get him more roles    hes not gonna get big movie roles, so why not have muscle that could make him stand out more   for example: the rock

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #43 on: June 17, 2008, 11:21:37 PM »
not in my case, I learned when I was young (I started competing as a teen) that even with massive amounts of drugs I lacked the genetics to be successful in bodybuilding.



So you're saying you also look like a sack of shit on or off, unlike Kev?

IronMagazine.com

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2761
  • IronMag Bodybuilding Blog Online Since 2001
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #44 on: June 17, 2008, 11:22:26 PM »
the thing is, hes not the best actor   maybe being bigger could get him more roles    hes not gonna get big movie roles, so why not have muscle that could make him stand out more   for example: the rock

ask him, he also has a band, or used to, I guess he does what he wants to do and has his reasons, which is cool.

schwarzenpecker

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 181
  • You may have seen me at your local video store
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #45 on: June 17, 2008, 11:23:18 PM »
you think being successful in acting, or Hollywood, is about being a good actor?

Yes, unless your a celebrity superstar which Kevin isn't. People may recognize him from old bb mags but he isn't a household name like the Rock was, but who has proven that he is a good actor, not just a body.

Jeffro

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3614
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #46 on: June 17, 2008, 11:25:38 PM »
So you're saying you also look like a sack of shit on or off, unlike Kev?
you look like a sack of shit, regardless

IronMagazine.com

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2761
  • IronMag Bodybuilding Blog Online Since 2001
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #47 on: June 17, 2008, 11:25:43 PM »
Yes, unless your a celebrity superstar which Kevin isn't. People may recognize him from old bb mags but he isn't a household name like the Rock was, but who has proven that he is a good actor, not just a body.

wake up call, having a certain look or the right connections, I have a very good friend that has spent his life in the business.

IronMagazine.com

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2761
  • IronMag Bodybuilding Blog Online Since 2001
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #48 on: June 17, 2008, 11:27:20 PM »
So you're saying you also look like a sack of shit on or off, unlike Kev?

brilliant post.

schwarzenpecker

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 181
  • You may have seen me at your local video store
Re: Kevin Levrone doesn't look all that bad at 43
« Reply #49 on: June 17, 2008, 11:31:20 PM »
wake up call, having a certain look or the right connections, I have a very good friend that has spent his life in the business.

I know he had the right connections, Arnold helped him but he still has to prove he can act and he hasn't yet.