Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: 240 is Back on September 05, 2008, 12:21:01 PM

Title: 333386 bumping another thread that is 1,100 days old.
Post by: 240 is Back on September 05, 2008, 12:21:01 PM
If this is true - I haven't read the issue, but people on other boards are posting that this week's issue says next week's issue will deliver details and proof of an affair that Palin had with one of her husband's business partners.

This may just be tabloid trash.  We said the same thing about edwards, however, and it ended up being true.

IF, and I mean IF, this story ends up being proven true, will that sink her chances with the republican base?  her entire platform is based on being very religious and all that good stuff.  How much could an affair hurt her?
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: 240 is Back on September 05, 2008, 12:34:27 PM
if true like edwards.....it's over !  :o

normally I wouldn't believe anything they say... but... they NAILED Edwards and ended his career in politics. 

They got a lot of new credibility, and they're not even pushing the grandmother/baby angle at all.

They're saying they have proof of an affair.  I can't imagine how big that would be.
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: 240 is Back on September 05, 2008, 12:54:44 PM
BREAKING: Court DENIES Motion to Seal Divorce Papers of Todd P. Business Partner


Fri Sep 05, 2008 at 10:22:38 AM PDT
The Alaska Court system's docket page shows that today, the court DENIED the motion to make the case file confidential.

The 9/4/08 docket entry says:

09/04/2008 Order Denying Motion Case Motion #3: Motion to Make Case File Confidential
The link Andrew Sullivan provided only worked once after I'd tried several times to access it, but this seems to indicate that whatever information (good, bad, or irrelevant) is contained in those divorce papers is going to be fair game for the press, if they haven't already accessed it.
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: 240 is Back on September 05, 2008, 01:01:58 PM
Interestingly, if this is true, and she had an affair... (which court documents released on a Friday afternoon might show)...

That would mean that both REPUBLICAN candidates slept around.

And both DEMOCRAT candidates have been faithful.

Isn't that strange?
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: tonymctones on September 05, 2008, 01:06:57 PM
Interestingly, if this is true, and she had an affair... (which court documents released on a Friday afternoon might show)...

That would mean that both REPUBLICAN candidates slept around.

And both DEMOCRAT candidates have been faithful.

Isn't that strange?
with as much shit that has come out and that you have spammed this board with that has been proven wrong actually what rumor has been proven right?

I think ill wait and see with this one...although i gotta say many ppl are adulates and this doesnt make them a bad person like ozmo likes to think.
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: Grape Ape on September 05, 2008, 01:09:21 PM
The Democrats have been teaching us since the late 90s that adultery means nothing.
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: 240 is Back on September 05, 2008, 01:10:28 PM
with as much shit that has come out and that you have spammed this board with that has been proven wrong actually what rumor has been proven right?

I think ill wait and see with this one...although i gotta say many ppl are adulates and this doesnt make them a bad person like ozmo likes to think.

What has been proven wrong?  

The grandkid?  Dude, that's just unproven thus far.  Until palin stops hding the birth certificate and the hospital/state stop hiding all the records, that's quite unproven.

Now, about this rumor... sure, a lot of people cheat.  but if they do prove she cheated, it sure undermines her religious positions.  
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: Option D on September 05, 2008, 01:10:59 PM
The Democrats have been teaching us since the late 90s that adultery means nothing.
thats a cheating husband...but a cheating wife....thats all bad
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: tonymctones on September 05, 2008, 01:17:30 PM
What has been proven wrong?  

The grandkid?  Dude, that's just unproven thus far.  Until palin stops hding the birth certificate and the hospital/state stop hiding all the records, that's quite unproven.

Now, about this rumor... sure, a lot of people cheat.  but if they do prove she cheated, it sure undermines her religious positions.  
ok what has been proven true? and isnt just a rumor

LOL how does it undermine her religious positions?...the bible says all ppl sin...and that you should ask for forgiveness

and if we are going to get into undermining positions how about obama being for everybody but married to a wife with views of racism.
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: danielson on September 05, 2008, 01:55:14 PM
Bill Clinton cheated and he and his pig of a wife gave speeches at the DNC. Whats the difference?
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: 240 is Back on September 05, 2008, 02:07:57 PM
Bill Clinton cheated and he and his pig of a wife gave speeches at the DNC. Whats the difference?

he's a scumbag too.  I don't think anyone dispute that.  Except Joe.  Voted for him, and all.
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Benny B on September 06, 2008, 04:22:02 AM
apparently this hottie likes to fvck. 5 kids with her husband, all while fvcking his business partner.

the enquire exposed edwards affair and now the target is on palin's extramarital affair.

this could get very interesting !   :o


NT
Really?  :o
Never heard this one but I hope there is some truth to it.  ;D
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: 24KT on September 06, 2008, 04:30:01 AM
(http://www.jaguarenterprises.net/images/em/shocked.gif)
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: MuscleMcMannus on September 06, 2008, 04:32:11 AM
Haha I FUCKING KNEW there was some dirt on this MILF.  I just wish it would have been she had a lesbian three way with the babysitter and Cindy McCain.  :) 
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Benny B on September 06, 2008, 04:40:25 AM
I just wish it would have been she had a lesbian three way with the babysitter and Cindy McCain.  :) 
Cindy's a little long in the tooth but that would still be hot.  ;D

Edwards affair or not, I just can't bring myself to trust the National Enquirer on anything yet. Too many celebrity slander stories, two headed baby articles, etc. Maybe they have "officially" gone into serious journalism now?  :-\
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: 24KT on September 06, 2008, 04:56:59 AM
Cindy's a little long in the tooth but that would still be hot.  ;D

Edwards affair or not, I just can't bring myself to trust the National Enquirer on anything yet. Too many celebrity slander stories, two headed baby articles, etc. Maybe they have "officially" gone into serious journalism now?  :-\

The Enquirer isn't into 'Two Headed Babies', ...those exclusives are broken by 'The Weekly World News'   ;D
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 06, 2008, 04:59:09 AM

if proven true like edwards, the mccain ticket is doomed.


NT
Don't underestimate the power of psychopathic retarded racist dipshits :D
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Benny B on September 06, 2008, 05:01:33 AM
The Enquirer isn't into 'Two Headed Babies', ...those exclusives are broken by 'The Weekly World News'   ;D
Those rags are all the same shit to me jag, but you are right. ;D
Bottom line, the NE was in the business of blatantly lying and getting sued for slander by celebs for years.
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 06, 2008, 05:05:32 AM
holy crap... I knew it... Huckabee will be McCain's VP...  If this is true, it will end her and she will have to withdraw.  He'll then be forced to go Huckabee to keep the same people happy that were happy with Sarah...
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: w8tlftr on September 06, 2008, 05:06:41 AM
You guys are obsessed with this woman.

I means she's a hot milf but damn.

Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: MuscleMcMannus on September 06, 2008, 05:17:22 AM
You guys are obsessed with this woman.

I means she's a hot milf but damn.



Yes you're right but I also feel the same way about Cindy McCain and Ms. Biden.  My god those two and Palin in a three way!  Excuse me while I go rub one off! LOL.  Maybe throw Spitzer's wife in the mix for a naughty little shower scene 4 way :) 
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 06, 2008, 05:42:37 AM
If this is true, there will be no choice... The republicans have put themselves in a no win on trying to defend this...

Normally, I would say this is a joke, stfu.  National Enquirer... please... But the Republicans raised the bar for that rag.  And indeed they did follow through with a huge breaking story.  I use to find it funny that some of the best political shit I read came out of Hustler Magazine.  Funny but true.  If the Enquirer breaks this story, they're going to be setting a reputation with this.  How fucking ironic it will be to have the freaking National Enquirer making all the major media outlets look like asses... yea, the asses we all know they are.  This will be total p'wnage, in more ways than one!

But this one is Pelican Brief shit... Hope they have really good security over there at the Enquirer and don't intimidation easy.
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 06, 2008, 05:48:05 AM
Ok, based on their past MO at NE, they don't just put it out in full, they put it out, get the denials and then slam the hammer down...  LOL... This looks to be following that pattern :D
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 06, 2008, 05:58:14 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 06, 2008, 06:00:11 AM
oh... I just realised, this really ain't good... This be the women over 35 readership :D
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Benny B on September 06, 2008, 06:05:59 AM
 ;D
Storms are brewing in Sarah Palin’s eyes
By Inside Track  |   Friday, September 5, 2008  |  http://www.bostonherald.com 

ST. PAUL, Minn. - The McCain Campaign is denying a supermarket tabloid story alleging that vice presidental candidate Sarah Palin had an extramarital affair, and is threatening legal action against the National Enquirer.

“Its a vicious lie,” John McCain spokesman Steve Schmidt said.

The Enquirer alleges in its Sept. 15 edition that Palin had a fling with a business associate of her husband, Todd Palin. The candidate’s hubby discovered the infidelity and dissolved the business, the article said.

The Enquirer attributed the allegation to “an enemy” of the Alaska governor and many pundits postulated that the tabloid’s source was Palin’s estranged brother-in-law, Mike Wooten. Wooten, who was embroiled in an ugly custody battle with Palin’s sister, claims the governor tried to have him fired from the Alaska state police.

“The smearing of the Palin family must end,” Schmidt said in a statement released yesterday.

The Enquirer, in a web story entitled “Palin War: Teen Preggo Crisis,” claims that Palin planned to have her pregnant 17-year-old daughter, Bristol, married off to her baby daddy right after the Republican National Convention.

The plan, the paper said, was to announce Bristol’s pregnancy after the wedding. However, the tabloid says the teen refused to go along with the wedding, sparking a “mother-daughter showdown.”

The Enquirer says the Palin camp revealed the pregnancy “hours after The Enquirer informed her representatives and family members of Levi Johnston, the father of Bristol’s child, that we were aware of the pregnancy and were going to break the news.”

The story adds that “The Enquirer has also learned that Palin’s family is embroiled in a vicious war that is now exposing her darkest secrets, threatening to destroy her political career.”
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: 240 is Back on September 06, 2008, 08:25:55 AM
LOL @ the stupid fvcks who said I was wrong when I mentioned this friday morning.
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 06, 2008, 08:27:40 AM
just wondering....since Sarah Palin apparently loves teh cock, will she give staffers BJ's in the Oral Office when she's sworn in as President?  ;D



NT
ohhhhh...boooooooo that's where you'd get boos from even the liberal crowd :D  Just keepin it real ;D
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: 240 is Back on September 06, 2008, 08:34:18 AM
so she got preggo before she got married.

cheated on her man.

Sounds like the Adultery Ticket doesn't have much moral high ground in this one.  Biden and Obama are good spouses.  These two seem to just love to cheat.
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: shootfighter1 on September 06, 2008, 08:34:51 AM
Its absolutely amazing how hard some are trying to discredit this woman.  Actually its appauling and the some of the reason I haven't checked this board lately.  240, and some of the others are posting every single negative story that comes up on the liberal blogs whether it has any credibility or not.  I guess their take on it is if you keep repeating negative things, whether true or not, it will change perceptions.  This is the part of politics I hate.
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: 240 is Back on September 06, 2008, 08:58:13 AM
Who was the man who had to drop out of the presidential race for having a chick sit on his lap at a party?

Wouldn't boning your hubby's business partner - while crusading on a platform of strong religious convictions - undermine her position on things?
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Grape Ape on September 06, 2008, 09:09:34 AM
Sure it would, but the left is batting .000 with this stuff, so it's easy to doubt.

Shootfighter's completely right (no pun), the cylce here is: go to a lefty blog, post crap, predict Palin's resignation, have it proven wrong, move to the next story.  Wash, rinse, repeat.

I hate this from both sides - I dislike Obama as a candidate, but ignore stories telling us he's a terrorist, etc......
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Montague on September 06, 2008, 09:16:32 AM
That’s what happens when people rely on either The American Spectator or The Daily Show for their political news.

Then again, you could easily substitute FOX and CNN for the above sources.
 :-\

Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 06, 2008, 09:29:19 AM
Its absolutely amazing how hard some are trying to discredit this woman.  Actually its appauling and the some of the reason I haven't checked this board lately.  240, and some of the others are posting every single negative story that comes up on the liberal blogs whether it has any credibility or not.  I guess their take on it is if you keep repeating negative things, whether true or not, it will change perceptions.  This is the part of politics I hate.
ohhhh.. booo hooo... The edwards story was fine from NE but this story is just slander ::)... Nobody has said for sure so how about you zip it until we read the story.  Same shit was flying about Edwards before it got nailed down.  Republicans were all over that, this thread is fair.  We wait and read and see if something actually comes from it.  Notice people are saying IF this is true.  Keep it in perspective... I am..
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 06, 2008, 09:32:06 AM
Sure it would, but the left is batting .000 with this stuff, so it's easy to doubt.
If this were a leftwing source, they wouldn't have outed Edwards. ::)  Please don't fucking try to tell us that the NE is a liberal rag ::)
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: tonymctones on September 06, 2008, 09:37:17 AM
Sounds like the Adultery Ticket doesn't have much moral high ground in this one.  Biden and Obama are good spouses.  These two seem to just love to cheat.
LOL you wanna talk about moral high ground? last time i checked racism was pretty immoral ya?
Wouldn't boning your hubby's business partner - while crusading on a platform of strong religious convictions - undermine her position on things?
Wouldnt holding racist views while attending a racist church and married to a wife who holds racist views while crusading for wanting to help everyone and being for all americans undermine his positions on things?

we know two things for sure here
1. your assertions and the medias assertions on palin have been proven to be wrong and dont tell the whole truth so again ill wait until the entire truth comes out.
2. Obama and his wife did attend a racist church and she did have racist writtings in her thesis.
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: 240 is Back on September 06, 2008, 09:38:16 AM
mctones,

I think we've established something here.

Both Obama's wife and Palin's hubby are anti-american.

Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: tonymctones on September 06, 2008, 09:40:41 AM
mctones,

I think we've established something here.

Both Obama's wife and Palin's hubby are anti-american.


go answer the other thread
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Dos Equis on September 06, 2008, 10:55:22 AM
Its absolutely amazing how hard some are trying to discredit this woman.  Actually its appauling and the some of the reason I haven't checked this board lately.  240, and some of the others are posting every single negative story that comes up on the liberal blogs whether it has any credibility or not.  I guess their take on it is if you keep repeating negative things, whether true or not, it will change perceptions.  This is the part of politics I hate.

I agree.  I think it discourages good people from running for office.  This is probably why people like Powell and Rice don't want to run. 
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: youandme on September 06, 2008, 11:02:23 AM
Like I said this is the Palin trap. We see it time and time again, the media beats up on someone and the American people rally behind them. The media is now hurting Obama's chances.
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Grape Ape on September 06, 2008, 11:02:45 AM
If this were a leftwing source, they wouldn't have outed Edwards. ::)  Please don't fucking try to tell us that the NE is a liberal rag ::)

Forgive me for disbelieving the rock-solid, completely respectable source that is the National Enquirer.
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: 240 is Back on September 06, 2008, 11:03:26 AM
ONLY people with records of being law-abiding citizens should run for office.

ONLY people with clean moral records should try to run as motal authorities.

IF McCain tried lecturing us on fmaily values, with his record, it'd be hypocritical and insulting.  So he doesn't do it.  Very cool of him.

HOWEVER - palin IS lecturing us on family values, and has tried to assume the moral high road on raising OTHER people's kids, slashing funding for sex ed.

However, while doing this, she was having an affair and not noticing her 16-year old getting preggo and drinking liquor.
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: Grape Ape on September 06, 2008, 11:04:18 AM


However, while doing this, she was having an affair and not noticing her 16-year old getting preggo and drinking liquor.

So, this is fact now?  You're better than this.
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: MCWAY on September 06, 2008, 12:33:51 PM
Sure it would, but the left is batting .000 with this stuff, so it's easy to doubt.

Shootfighter's completely right (no pun), the cylce here is: go to a lefty blog, post crap, predict Palin's resignation, have it proven wrong, move to the next story.  Wash, rinse, repeat.

I hate this from both sides - I dislike Obama as a candidate, but ignore stories telling us he's a terrorist, etc......

It's amazing that this woman has the far-left liberals running scared, in just ONE WEEK.

Apparently, they don't have enough confidence that Obama/Biden can get the job done.

Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: tonymctones on September 06, 2008, 12:38:26 PM
ONLY people with records of being law-abiding citizens should run for office.

ONLY people with clean moral records should try to run as motal authorities.

IF McCain tried lecturing us on fmaily values, with his record, it'd be hypocritical and insulting.  So he doesn't do it.  Very cool of him.

HOWEVER - palin IS lecturing us on family values, and has tried to assume the moral high road on raising OTHER people's kids, slashing funding for sex ed.

However, while doing this, she was having an affair and not noticing her 16-year old getting preggo and drinking liquor.
so instead youd rather have a racist preach and harp on unity and bringing everyone together?
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: 240 is Back on September 06, 2008, 12:42:22 PM
so instead youd rather have a racist preach and harp on unity and bringing everyone together?

shit no.

I'd rather they kick obama AND palin out, and pick a few people without so many skeletons.  biden is squeaky clean.  Ron paul, romney were both very clean.

mccain is a cheating dirtbag.  palin is a mess.  obama is a million Q marks.
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: Dos Equis on September 06, 2008, 01:01:29 PM
shit no.

I'd rather they kick obama AND palin out, and pick a few people without so many skeletons.  biden is squeaky clean.  Ron paul, romney were both very clean.


Oh good Lord.  Biden is squeaky clean?  lol.  And how many anti-Romney posts did you make? 
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on September 06, 2008, 01:02:10 PM
If this is true - I haven't read the issue, but people on other boards are posting that this week's issue says next week's issue will deliver details and proof of an affair that Palin had with one of her husband's business partners.

This may just be tabloid trash.  We said the same thing about edwards, however, and it ended up being true.

IF, and I mean IF, this story ends up being proven true, will that sink her chances with the republican base?  her entire platform is based on being very religious and all that good stuff.  How much could an affair hurt her?
the same people didnt seem to mind McCain leaving his original family for another woman, who just so happened to be rich and politically connected.
they didnt mind her daughter getting knocked up at 17.
why would they let this bother them?
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: MCWAY on September 06, 2008, 01:05:44 PM
the same people didnt seem to mind McCain leaving his original family for another woman, who just so happened to be rich and politically connected.
they didnt mind her daughter getting knocked up at 17.
why would they let this bother them?

Well, perhaps the biggest whoremonger and adulterer in American political history got a standing ovation at the DNC. But, that doesn't seem to bother the liberals here, for some reason.
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: Dos Equis on September 06, 2008, 01:07:51 PM
Well, perhaps the biggest whoremonger and adulterer in American political history got a standing ovation at the DNC. But, that doesn't seem to bother the liberals here, for some reason.

lol.  I wonder if they were clamoring for Bill's resignation? 
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on September 06, 2008, 01:17:48 PM
Well, perhaps the biggest whoremonger and adulterer in American political history got a standing ovation at the DNC. But, that doesn't seem to bother the liberals here, for some reason.
getting a bj from an intern is not as bad as shamelessly ditching your family for a woman who will help further your political career like your great Man of Integrity and Honor did ;)
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: MCWAY on September 06, 2008, 01:20:31 PM
getting a bj from an intern is not as bad as shamelessly ditching your family for a woman who will help further your political career like your great Man of Integrity and Honor did ;)

You know good and well that Bill was whoring around LOOOOOOONG before "Monica-gate". Unless, you're implying that it's fine to screw around on your wife, as long as you don't leave (notwithstanding the fact that Hilary has political reasons to stay with Bill and, were he to leave, Hilary would BLEED HIM DRY).
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: Straw Man on September 06, 2008, 01:40:07 PM
Well, perhaps the biggest whoremonger and adulterer in American political history got a standing ovation at the DNC. But, that doesn't seem to bother the liberals here, for some reason.

the difference is that BC didn't lecture the public on morals and family values.

That is always the difference in these issue.

Kind of like when David Vitter and Larry Craig sponsoring (among others) the Federal Marriage Ammendment
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: MCWAY on September 06, 2008, 01:59:21 PM
the difference is that BC didn't lecture the public on morals and family values.

Silly me! I thought married men were supposed to be faithful to their wives, not get caught red-handed and try to redefine what "is" is.


That is always the difference in these issue.

Kind of like when David Vitter and Larry Craig sponsoring (among others) the Federal Marriage Ammendment

AHHHHHH!!! So, whoring and adultering isn't as bad, provided you aren't lecturing the public about it (or a Democrat).


Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: Dos Equis on September 06, 2008, 02:01:39 PM
Rationalizations by liberals are comical. 
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: Straw Man on September 06, 2008, 02:07:10 PM
Silly me! I thought married men were supposed to be faithful to their wives.
AHHHHHH!!! So, whoring and adultering isn't as bad, provided you aren't lecturing the public about it (or a Democrat).

other people marriages are none of my biz.

When you are a public figure who preaches family values and then have an affair (allegedly) then the issue is hypocrisy

When you preach abstinence over sex education and your teenage daughter get's knocked up then the issue is hypocrisy.

When you want to take away a womans right to choose and then you want credit for not choosing abortion the issue is hypocrisy

Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: 240 is Back on September 06, 2008, 02:26:06 PM
Rationalizations by liberals are comical. 

yours certainly are.
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: MCWAY on September 06, 2008, 02:36:47 PM
other people marriages are none of my biz.

When you are a public figure who preaches family values and then have an affair (allegedly) then the issue is hypocrisy

Key word: Allegedly. I guess the whole "innocent until proven guilty" thing goes out the door, when it comes to conservatives, especially when they're women.



When you preach abstinence over sex education and your teenage daughter get's knocked up then the issue is hypocrisy.

You don't get it. It doesn't matter what type of sex education Palin favors. Her daughter DIDN'T heed it. Do you really think that girl knew nothing about condoms?

Had she used contraception, she might not have become pregnant; had she abstained, she DEFINITELY would not be pregnant. She did neither; she's pregnant. By your logic, we should get of sex education altogether, because there are plenty of teens who hear about condoms and birth control, BUT KEEP SCREWING WITHOUT USING THEM, anyway.

Of course, it's awfully hard to get pregnant, without having sexual intercourse. But, never let common sense stand in the way of the liberals' mantra of wanting the screw without consequence.


When you want to take away a womans right to choose and then you want credit for not choosing abortion the issue is hypocrisy


What she decided is that, Down's syndrome or not, that baby is just that: A BABY. Trig deserves a chance to live, not hacked to pieces due to his imperfection.
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: Straw Man on September 06, 2008, 02:38:13 PM
yours certainly are.

Beach Bunnys' rationalization are more sad and pathetic than funny and are usually followed by pretending not to understand the topic or when he's really stumped just the every ready eye roll......cue eye roll now
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: Straw Man on September 06, 2008, 02:47:26 PM
Key word: Allegedly. I guess the whole "innocent until proven guilty" thing goes out the door, when it comes to conservatives, especially when they're women.

yep - that's why I was careful to include the word



You don't get it. It doesn't matter what type of sex education Palin favors. Her daughter DIDN'T heed it. Do you really think that girl knew nothing about condoms?  Had she used contraception, she might not have become pregnant; had she abstained, she DEFINITELY would not be pregnant. By your logic, we should get of sex education altogether, because there are plenty of teens who hear about condoms and birth control, BUT KEEP SCREWING WITHOUT USING THEM, anyway.

My logic is that I think it should be taught for both preventing unwanted pregnancy and avoiding disease (not just HIV but all types of STD's)
Abstinence only works until the point where you can't abstain and then you better have a back up plan.  You're right on one thing.  I'm sure Bristol was aware of condoms and how they work so I guess she's either stupid or maybe wanted to get knocked up (not uncommon)

What she decided is that, Down's syndrome or not, that baby is just that: A BABY. Trig deserves a chance to live, not hacked to pieces due to his imperfection.

Given her strident position on abortion I would expect nothing less of her.

Any other CHOICE would have been hypocritical
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: MCWAY on September 06, 2008, 02:51:46 PM
yep - that's why I was careful to include the word

Good for you!

[quote author=Straw Man link=topic=232560.msg3279318#msg3279318

My logic is that I think it should be taught for both preventing unwanted pregnancy and avoiding disease (not just HIV but all types of STD's)
Abstinence only works until the point where you can't abstain and then you better have a back up plan.  You're right on one thing.  I'm sure Bristol was aware of condoms and how they work so I guess she's either stupid or maybe wanted to get knocked up (not uncommon).[/quote]

She didn't use "Plan A" or "Plan B".


Given her strident position on abortion I would expect nothing less of her.

Any other CHOICE would have been hypocritical

Then, why are you talking about hypocrisy, in this case? If there were ANY opening for her to be hypocritical with regards to abortion, those two instance (her pregnancy with Trig and her daughter's out-of-wedlock pregnancy) would have been it.
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: 24KT on September 06, 2008, 02:52:44 PM
Its absolutely amazing how hard some are trying to discredit this woman.  Actually its appauling and the some of the reason I haven't checked this board lately.  240, and some of the others are posting every single negative story that comes up on the liberal blogs whether it has any credibility or not.  I guess their take on it is if you keep repeating negative things, whether true or not, it will change perceptions.  This is the part of politics I hate.

John, this isn't liberal blog speculation, ...this is an international news story in circulation in the intl news media

Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: MCWAY on September 06, 2008, 03:01:20 PM
John, this isn't liberal blog speculation, ...this is an international news story in circulation in the intl news media


That's likely where it started. And, would any of this international news media be of the left-leaning kind, particularly the ones that cried almost as much as the liberals did here, when Bush got re-elected (i.e. the UK's "Guardian")?
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: 24KT on September 06, 2008, 03:03:22 PM

Rationalizations by liberals are comical. 


You give liberals far too much credit, they're really not all that comical.
Republicans on the other hand, ...they're an absolute hoot!   ;D

See for yourself... what Liberal could ever possibly compete with such incredible comedy gold...



                Republican Comedy Gold
 
If there was an Olympic Gold medal for comedic moments, ...the Republicans would win hands down.
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: Straw Man on September 06, 2008, 03:05:42 PM
Good for you!

Then, why are you talking about hypocrisy, in this case? If there were ANY opening for her to be hypocritical with regards to abortion, those two instance (her pregnancy with Trig and her daughter's out-of-wedlock pregnancy) would have been it.

it's simple - she's an advocate of removing all possiblity for choice so can't expect any credit when it's her turn to make that choice for herself.  

Good for Sarah Palin for not having an abortion.   I don't think it's an issue.

Too bad for Bristol Palin that her abstinence training failed.  That happens alot.  Too bad she wasn't smart enough to use a condom.

Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Decker on September 06, 2008, 03:20:24 PM
I agree.  I think it discourages good people from running for office.  This is probably why people like Powell and Rice don't want to run. 
And just what do either of those two wastes of space have to do with "good people?"
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: 24KT on September 06, 2008, 04:27:46 PM
it's simple - she's an advocate of removing all possiblity for choice so can't expect any credit when it's her turn to make that choice for herself.  

Good for Sarah Palin for not having an abortion.   I don't think it's an issue.

Too bad for Bristol Palin that her abstinence training failed.  That happens alot.  Too bad she wasn't smart enough to use a condom.



It's too bad Sarah Palin trumpets every moment that it was Bristol's choice to keep her baby,
...but can't see the hypocrisy of taking a position that supports choice for her own daughter, but no one else's
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: MCWAY on September 06, 2008, 04:30:22 PM
It's too bad Sarah Palin trumpets every moment that it was Bristol's choice to keep her baby,
...but can't see the hypocrisy of taking a position that supports choice for her own daughter, but no one else's

What she can see that this isn't about "choice"; it's about the BABY.

Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: Dos Equis on September 06, 2008, 06:04:42 PM
yours certainly are.

You know I could slap you around all day, but I start to feel sorry for you sometimes.  :) 
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Dos Equis on September 06, 2008, 06:05:35 PM
And just what do either of those two wastes of space have to do with "good people?"

They're both great Americans.  I'd vote for a Powell/Rice ticket.   :) 
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Decker on September 06, 2008, 07:09:23 PM
They're both great Americans.  I'd vote for a Powell/Rice ticket.   :) 
Of course you would.  Rice missed all the warnings for 9/11 and Powell disgraced himself by lying to the UN so the US could attack the wrong country.

Since you're a Bush fan, this would be your dream team ticket.
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: 24KT on September 06, 2008, 07:33:28 PM
Of course you would.  Rice missed all the warnings for 9/11 and Powell disgraced himself by lying to the UN so the US could attack the wrong country.

Since you're a Bush fan, this would be your dream team ticket.


Only until Nov. After the election, he'll either be unemployed,  or horny for Obama / Biden, ...or both.
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: Montague on September 06, 2008, 08:44:21 PM
the difference is that BC didn't lecture the public on morals and family values.

No.
But he did stand there and lie about the affair, which to me is worse.

I’ve always believed that was the bigger issue with Wild Bill, and ultimately lead to the impeachment trial.
Hell, his approval rating went up when that whole mess (on the dress) started, which flagrantly proved that Americans love BJ’s.

So you cigar-fvcked an intern who “in turn” smoked your stogie, and you got caught.
Fine.
There are plenty of things far worse than that.

But when you’re the President of the United States, it’s not a great policy to lie about the incident, especially with so much incontrovertible evidence - i.e. squirting your DNA all over the other party’s dress.

Do it.
But don’t lie about it.
You’re the PRESIDENT for fvck’s sake.
That damages credibility.

Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 06, 2008, 08:57:01 PM




 
 

That could be one of the best P'wnings of Rove I've ever seen...  What a fucking douchebag.
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: Benny B on September 06, 2008, 09:05:51 PM

I just watched this, and this is pure comic gold.  ;D An utter roasting of the repubes, and I don't even care for John Stewart.
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: 24KT on September 06, 2008, 09:33:31 PM
That could be one of the best P'wnings of Rove I've ever seen...  What a fucking douchebag.

The entire episode was amazing. He had Newt Gingrich as a guest and p'wned him as well (respectfully tho)

It was the Sept 3rd episode I believe. Check it out on the Comedy Central website.

It's on Comedy Network website is your IP address shows you as Canadian  (thanks to the CRTC) 

http://watch.thecomedynetwork.ca/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart/full-episodes/september-3-2008/ (http://watch.thecomedynetwork.ca/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart/full-episodes/september-3-2008/)
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Dos Equis on September 07, 2008, 01:43:38 PM
Of course you would.  Rice missed all the warnings for 9/11 and Powell disgraced himself by lying to the UN so the US could attack the wrong country.

Since you're a Bush fan, this would be your dream team ticket.

My admiration for Powell and Rice has nothing to do with Bush.  It's pretty simple:  I admire them because they are great Americans.  They would do an excellent job leading the country.  Too bad the nasty nature of politics keeps people like them on the sidelines. 
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Dos Equis on September 07, 2008, 01:44:55 PM
Only until Nov. After the election, he'll either be unemployed,  or horny for Obama / Biden, ...or both.

After the election, you'll still be (a) old, (b) Canadian, and (c) trolling a bodybuilding message board for snake oil customers.   :)
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: Straw Man on September 07, 2008, 02:27:03 PM
No.
But he did stand there and lie about the affair, which to me is worse.

I’ve always believed that was the bigger issue with Wild Bill, and ultimately lead to the impeachment trial.
Hell, his approval rating went up when that whole mess (on the dress) started, which flagrantly proved that Americans love BJ’s.

So you cigar-fvcked an intern who “in turn” smoked your stogie, and you got caught.
Fine.
There are plenty of things far worse than that.

But when you’re the President of the United States, it’s not a great policy to lie about the incident, especially with so much incontrovertible evidence - i.e. squirting your DNA all over the other party’s dress.

Do it.
But don’t lie about it.
You’re the PRESIDENT for fvck’s sake.
That damages credibility.

Yeah - a lot of people get hung up on that and I certainly can't defend Clinton for lying or trying to parse the definition of "is".   

Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: 24KT on September 07, 2008, 05:24:45 PM
After the election, you'll still be (a) old, (b) Canadian, and (c) trolling a bodybuilding message board for snake oil customers.   :)

B) Canadian  :)
Title: Re: Nat'l enquirer claims next week's issue will prove Palin Affair?
Post by: youandme on September 07, 2008, 05:30:40 PM
haha US Weekly just lost 10k subscribers when they ran that cover story on Palin being very negative
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Straw Man on September 07, 2008, 06:41:22 PM
B) Canadian  :)

what's wrong with being an old Canadian?

Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: 24KT on September 07, 2008, 06:43:07 PM
what's wrong with being an old Canadian?


I'm not sure, ...but when I do get old, ...I'll be sure to let you all know about both the pros & the cons.  :)
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Straw Man on September 07, 2008, 06:45:10 PM
I'm not sure, ...but when I do get old, ...I'll be sure to let you all know about both the pros & the cons.  :)

why is being old and/or Canadian an insult?

Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: 24KT on September 07, 2008, 06:53:18 PM
why is being old and/or Canadian an insult?


You'll have to ask Beach. (http://www.jaguarenterprises.net/images/em/shrug.gif)
Title: Re: Sarah Palin's extramarital affair.......
Post by: Dos Equis on September 07, 2008, 11:04:56 PM
I'm not sure, ...but when I do get old

Hahahahahahahaha!