Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Sherief Shalaby on September 21, 2008, 10:01:06 PM
-
Not only from these pictures but also Flex Mag. mentioned in its issue abt Mr. O. 96 that Nasser improved noticeably than Mr. O. 95.. And it's knwn 4 everybody that in 97 he clearly looked worse than both 95 and 96.. Flex Mag. also mentioned that Shawn in 96 was exactly the same as in 95 and I believe he looked the same in 97..
So how come Shawn wth his constant shape ws beaten by Nasser in 95 and 97 and was not beaten by Nasser's best shape at the Olympia in 96??.. Put in mind that the same judges were judging the 3 contests!!.. Here I am not saying tht Shawn was better or Nasser was better but I am just wondering how the judges of the Olympia were setting their standards every year.. My opinion is that they were placing the guys according to wht would keep the sport more popular.. 4 example in 1996 Shawn Ray came 3rd in the Ironman (4 the first time after Paul Dillet who was 2nd) then placed 5th at the AC and everybody started saying tht Shawn was over and it was better 4 him to retire.. So at the Olympia and in order to revive Shawn who was a popular figure they gave him 2nd after Dorian.. Again I am not saying tht Shawn didn't deserve this.. Sorry I hav 2 keep clarifying my thoughts coz some idiots here always like to create stupid arguments by converting the aim of any thread..
-
Your point is valid...they simply want to push who is popular at the moment, or who they want to dress up as a contender. Remember the hype about Gunter a few years ago? Not taking anything away from Gunter, but the bodybuilding media saw that people were getting sick of Coleman winning, so they dressed up Cutler (deservedly so) and Gunter (not so much) as the great white hopes to challenge Ronnie. As a result, Gunter got a few gift placings. To a lesser extent, same thing happened with Federov. Basically, whoever is marketable at the time (and under the right contract) gets the gift placings.
-
You're completely out of your mind dude. That was 10+ years ago, who gives a shit?
-
Your point is valid...they simply want to push who is popular at the moment, or who they want to dress up as a contender. Remember the hype about Gunter a few years ago? Not taking anything away from Gunter, but the bodybuilding media saw that people were getting sick of Coleman winning, so they dressed up Cutler (deservedly so) and Gunter (not so much) as the great white hopes to challenge Ronnie. As a result, Gunter got a few gift placings. To a lesser extent, same thing happened with Federov. Basically, whoever is marketable at the time (and under the right contract) gets the gift placings.
I totally agree wth u abt Gunter.. 4 me he ws nt created 2 b a good bodybuilder and I couldn't believe hw he was placed high at the olympia few years ago..
-
You're completely out of your mind dude. That was 10+ years ago, who gives a shit?
Believe me some old guys here (like myself) give some "shit" to this era.. Also if u understood this thread well u would knw it's abt a general subject and not only Nasser and Shawn.. They r only an example..
-
great post as usual sherief.....
ur certainly not the type of guy to start bullshit threads
always a pleasure to read.....
shawns vacum is unbelievable
i didnt realise shawn done the ASC and the ironman in 96 i thought most of his career he only competed at the olympia
-
96 Mr O Shawn was ripped. Watch the battle for the O vid. That's why he was put in front of Nasser. Earlier that year at the Ironman and the Arnold he was a little heavier.
I thought most thought Nasser was better in 1997 than 96.
-
Shawn was not the same every year. Shawn's best condition ever leading up the show was 1996 according to himself (bfto 96). 95 he was clearly off his normal stellar conditioning. Shawn was just too small to be Mr. Olympia. He got lost in callouts and posedowns. If you want proof of this just watch the 1995 Olympia pre-judging. In the first callout it's like Shawn isn't even up there. It's not until Nasser gets up there that you realize someone was standing to the right of Doz.
-
great post as usual sherief.....
ur certainly not the type of guy to start bullshit threads
always a pleasure to read.....
shawns vacum is unbelievable
i didnt realise shawn done the ASC and the ironman in 96 i thought most of his career he only competed at the olympia
Many thx bud.. Nice ppl like u r rare here :)
-
96 Mr O Shawn was ripped. Watch the battle for the O vid. That's why he was put in front of Nasser. Earlier that year at the Ironman and the Arnold he was a little heavier.
I thought most thought Nasser was better in 1997 than 96.
In 97 Nasser although was noticeably lighter thn his usual looked softer.. Check the vines in his arms to knw wht I mean.. As 4 Shawn u r right he ws ripped but this ws the case also in 95 so why they put him after Nasser then the following year put him b4 an improved Nasser??..
-
Shawn was not the same every year. Shawn's best condition ever leading up the show was 1996 according to himself (bfto 96). 95 he was clearly off his normal stellar conditioning. Shawn was just too small to be Mr. Olympia. He got lost in callouts and posedowns. If you want proof of this just watch the 1995 Olympia pre-judging. In the first callout it's like Shawn isn't even up there. It's not until Nasser gets up there that you realize someone was standing to the right of Doz.
U may b right but in 97 Shawn was on but still they put him after a softer version of Nasser..
-
Many thx bud.. Nice ppl like u r rare here :)
thanks
u will get to know who the good guys are
u will get to know who the children are...
it might shock u when u begin to realise how many guys here actually dont like bodybuilding and talk about how bad it is and how stupid it is etc...
it still puzzles me to this day why the fuck they post here.... theres no way i would waste my time posting on a baseball website because i simply dont like it.... i dont even know the basic rules of baseball
-
thanks
u will get to know who the good guys are
u will get to know who the children are...
it might shock u when u begin to realise how many guys here actually dont like bodybuilding and talk about how bad it is and how stupid it is etc...
it still puzzles me to this day why the fuck they post here.... theres no way i would waste my time posting on a baseball website because i simply dont like it.... i dont even know the basic rules of baseball
U reminded me of tht guy who replied 2 my thread (Dorian's Legs) expecting tht I ws making a trick and those were Nasser's legs and whn I told him he should knw the diff. between Dorian's legs and Nasser's he answered with somthng like "I don't give a shit and I don't care 2 check men legs"!!!!.. U r right,.. why does some 1 like this keep posting here and keep arguing abt somthng he doesn't like or understand or give a shit 2!!!..
By the way I 4got 2 tell u that Shawn also competed at AC 90 and 91.. And yes u r right in general he was concentrating only on the olympia..
-
Not only from these pictures but also Flex Mag. mentioned in its issue abt Mr. O. 96 that Nasser improved noticeably than Mr. O. 95.. And it's knwn 4 everybody that in 97 he clearly looked worse than both 95 and 96.. Flex Mag. also mentioned that Shawn in 96 was exactly the same as in 95 and I believe he looked the same in 97..
So how come Shawn wth his constant shape ws beaten by Nasser in 95 and 97 and was not beaten by Nasser's best shape at the Olympia in 96??.. Put in mind that the same judges were judging the 3 contests!!.. Here I am not saying tht Shawn was better or Nasser was better but I am just wondering how the judges of the Olympia were setting their standards every year.. My opinion is that they were placing the guys according to wht would keep the sport more popular.. 4 example in 1996 Shawn Ray came 3rd in the Ironman (4 the first time after Paul Dillet who was 2nd) then placed 5th at the AC and everybody started saying tht Shawn was over and it was better 4 him to retire.. So at the Olympia and in order to revive Shawn who was a popular figure they gave him 2nd after Dorian.. Again I am not saying tht Shawn didn't deserve this.. Sorry I hav 2 keep clarifying my thoughts coz some idiots here always like to create stupid arguments by converting the aim of any thread..
This thread needs more pictures, Sherief. Good comparison as usual. From what I can remember, Shawn was a little off in '95 but showed up great in '96 and pretty much the same in '97. Nasser looked fuller in '97 but I agree he looked better in both '95 and '96. His structure didn't really carry the extra mass nicely. So him beating Shawn in '95 was justified. '96 he got disqualified but Shawn's conditioning that year probably made the difference. '97: I think everyone from Nasser to Shawn and Kevin could argue that they deserved the title. Nasser was the only one to beat Dorian sizewise except for his back. That's why they battled for first and second spot. If the judges wanted someone to prevail for his conditioning and proportions, both Shawn and Kevin should have placed ahead of Nasser and Dorian.
-
U reminded me of tht guy who replied 2 my thread (Dorian's Legs) expecting tht I ws making a trick and those were Nasser's legs and whn I told him he should knw the diff. between Dorian's legs and Nasser's he answered with somthng like "I don't give a shit and I don't care 2 check men legs"!!!!.. U r right,.. why does some 1 like this keep posting here and keep arguing abt somthng he doesn't like or understand or give a shit 2!!!..
By the way I 4got 2 tell u that Shawn also competed at AC 90 and 91.. And yes u r right in general he was concentrating only on the olympia..
yep he got disqualified at the 90 ASC .... or maybe the 91 ASC and then after that i thought he just gave up on all the other shows to focus on the "O"
-
This thread needs more pictures, Sherief. Good comparison as usual. From what I can remember, Shawn was a little off in '95 but showed up great in '96 and pretty much the same in '97. Nasser looked fuller in '97 but I agree he looked better in both '95 and '96. His structure didn't really carry the extra mass nicely. So him beating Shawn in '95 was justified. '96 he got disqualified but Shawn's conditioning that year probably made the difference. '97: I think everyone from Nasser to Shawn and Kevin could argue that they deserved the title. Nasser was the only one to beat Dorian sizewise except for his back. That's why they battled for first and second spot. If the judges wanted someone to prevail for his conditioning and proportions, both Shawn and Kevin should have placed ahead of Nasser and Dorian.
Thx Rza.. But it's strange 2 know tht Nasser's weight in 96 was 285 pounds while in 97 he dropped his weight to be 270 pounds on a hope 2 look better and sharper but actually he didn't.. I belive he overdieted.. Still as u mentioned if he or Kevin or Shawn won in 97 it would be better 4 the sport..
-
How did you know that Shawn was the same in all 3 years?
With different lighting its very hard to tell if he was harder or softer
-
yep he got disqualified at the 90 ASC .... or maybe the 91 ASC and then after that i thought he just gave up on all the other shows to focus on the "O"
Ys after winning in 1990 he failed a drug test and had to return his trophy and check thn he came again in 91 and won the title
-
How did you know that Shawn was the same in all 3 years?
With different lighting its very hard to tell if he was harder or softer
I am saying this depending on wht they wrote in the magazines.. Also 4 me and wth my amateur eyes I believe he was the same..
-
Ys after winning in 1990 he failed a drug test and had to return his trophy and check thn he came again in 91 and won the title
u know the sport well....
where u from sherief?
-
Thx Rza.. But it's strange 2 know tht Nasser's weight in 96 was 285 pounds while in 97 he dropped his weight to be 270 pounds on a hope 2 look better and sharper but actually he didn't.. I belive he overdieted.. Still as u mentioned if he or Kevin or Shawn won in 97 it would be better 4 the sport..
Well, more rotation would be good. And '97 was far from being the only occasion when Bbing would have benefited from a different Mr.O. Overall, Yates pretty much deserved 4 or 5 of his six titles. Let's think about all the others: Haney in '89 and '90, Franco on both occasions, Dickerson's title, Arnold beating Oliva in '72 and his '80 win, etc....And Ronnie post-2000 won moslty because of inconsistent competition.
-
u know the sport well....
where u from sherief?
Egypt in north Africa.. One of the oldest countries :)
-
Egypt in north Africa.. One of the oldest countries :)
interesting country, i have to see the pyramids before i die (human beings didnt have the technology to build them alone)
your written english is very good.... u must either be very rich or egypt must have a very good education system in place ;)
-
Well, more rotation would be good. And '97 was far from being the only occasion when Bbing would have benefited from a different Mr.O. Overall, Yates pretty much deserved 4 or 5 of his six titles. Let's think about all the others: Haney in '89 and '90, Franco on both occasions, Dickerson's title, Arnold beating Oliva in '72 and his '80 win, etc....And Ronnie post-2000 won moslty because of inconsistent competition.
I believe tht the ppl of the Olympia always want 2 find extraordinary champ 2 put him above the others 4 the longest time they can.. So sometimes when this super hero is off and doesn't deserve 2 win they still give him the title 2 keep going the way they want coz this of course makes the contest more popular.. They don't want 2 give it 2 average good guys like they did in the past whn the title went 2 Dickerson, Bannout, and Colombo.. After Arnold they didn't find the right man quickly and had 2 judge "right" till Haney came.. After Haney, Dorian was the clear new leader 2 rule.. Then after Dorian they didn't want 2 give it 2 guys like Shawn, Kevin, Nasser, or, Flex coz all of them were Dorian's first competitors and non of them could beat him even one time.. So 2 give the title 2 any of them would make ppl say the winner won only coz Dorian was not there and this of course would make the contest weaker and less popular.. So instead of doing tht and coz there was no new hero to rule, they created the story of Ronnie, the guy who came from no where 2 beat all the others who were above him 4 many years.. So instead of creating a nw hero they create a hero frm an existed material..
-
I believe tht the ppl of the Olympia always want 2 find extraordinary champ 2 put him above the others 4 the longest time they can.. So sometimes when this super hero is off and doesn't deserve 2 win they still give him the title 2 keep going the way they want coz this of course makes the contest more popular.. They don't want 2 give it 2 average good guys like they did in the past whn the title went 2 Dickerson, Bannout, and Colombo.. After Arnold they didn't find the right man quickly and had 2 judge "right" till Haney came.. After Haney, Dorian was the clear new leader 2 rule.. Then after Dorian they didn't want 2 give it 2 guys like Shawn, Kevin, Nasser, or, Flex coz all of them were Dorian's first competitors and non of them could beat him even one time.. So 2 give the title 2 any of them would make ppl say the winner won only coz Dorian was not there and this of course would make the contest weaker and less popular.. So instead of doing tht and coz there was no new hero to rule, they created the story of Ronnie, the guy who came from no where 2 beat all the others who were above him 4 many years.. So instead of creating a nw hero they create a hero frm an existed material..
Maybe but at least Bannout deserved his title more than most other Mr O albeit for one and only year. He dominated that Mr O like very few dominated. Ronnie certainly deserved his first as he was probably overlooked the two previous years. Competition was starting to decline at that point. Shawn, Nasser, Kevin, Dillett and Flex were already past their prime. Dorian's years were the most competitive since Arnold's first run. It's probably a shame they always chose the same guy. Haney didn't have such great competition 'til Gaspari and Labrada showed up either.
-
interesting country, i have to see the pyramids before i die (human beings didnt have the technology to build them alone)
your written english is very good.... u must either be very rich or egypt must have a very good education system in place ;)
Hahaha no my friend I am an average Egyptian guy and there r many thousands of ppl in Egypt like me and better.. Bth my spoken and written English is ok coz I work in z exporting field:).. Unfortunately some guys still think that there is nothing in the developing countries like my country but actually whn u come u will find a lot!!... An idiot here called me b4 "Camel Boy"!!.. Nothing bad in this and I am proud 2 be from Egypt and if ppl in Egypt were still using camels I would be proud of using them but actually this was hundreds of years ago.. The same era when USA and Europe were using horses!!..
-
Maybe but at least Bannout deserved his title more than most other Mr O albeit for one and only year. He dominated that Mr O like very few dominated. Ronnie certainly deserved his first as he was probably overlooked the two previous years. Competition was starting to decline at that point. Shawn, Nasser, Kevin, Dillett and Flex were already past their prime. Dorian's years were the most competitive since Arnold's first run. It's probably a shame they always chose the same guy. Haney didn't have such great competition 'til Gaspari and Labrada showed up either.
Sure Samir deserved his title and may be the other one Olympia guys also deserved to win.. I just meant tht after Arnold there was no "super hero" so they had 2 judge in a fair way till Lee Haney came.. And 4 sure wth super heroes like Haney and thn Dorian they were judging fairly but they could avoid fairness one or 2 time in order nt 2 destroy the image of their hero and so the popularity of their contest..
-
Sure Samir deserved his title and may be the other one Olympia guys also deserved to win.. I just meant tht after Arnold there was no "super hero" so they had 2 judge in a fair way till Lee Haney came.. And 4 sure wth super heroes like Haney and thn Dorian they were judging fairly but they could avoid fairness one or 2 time in order nt 2 destroy the image of their hero and so the popularity of their contest..
IMHO, Franco and Dickerson didn't deserve their titles. I wouldn't say that the O is judged fairly. Competitive bodybuilding is not that competitive.
-
Hahaha no my friend I am an average Egyptian guy and there r many thousands of ppl in Egypt like me and better.. Bth my spoken and written English is ok coz I work in z exporting field:).. Unfortunately some guys still think that there is nothing in the developing countries like my country but actually whn u come u will find a lot!!... An idiot here called me b4 "Camel Boy"!!.. Nothing bad in this and I am proud 2 be from Egypt and if ppl in Egypt were still using camels I would be proud of using them but actually this was hundreds of years ago.. The same era when USA and Europe were using horses!!..
Hmm. Well, Getbig already has a 'Camel Jockey' so you'd be at a disadvantage. ;)
/i read el-aswany's the youcoubian building last year. very good. kind of like an egyptian 'tales of the city' (maupin)
-
Hmm. Well, Getbig already has a 'Camel Jockey' so you'd be at a disadvantage. ;)
/i read el-aswany's the youcoubian building last year. very good. kind of like an egyptian 'tales of the city' (maupin)
In which language u read it??.. The Arabic literature is very old and rich by the way..
-
In which language u read it??.. The Arabic literature is very old and rich by the way..
English. Ordered a signed 1st for my da from a British dealer. When it arrived, I started poking through it and, then before long, I had read it. He has a new one out called 'Chicago.' I was thinking about maybe picking that one up.