Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: 240 is Back on September 27, 2008, 05:41:12 PM

Title: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: 240 is Back on September 27, 2008, 05:41:12 PM
Aside from Ronnie, who beats this?  Of course, he still has to contend with Jay on back shots.
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: tendonitis on September 27, 2008, 05:42:31 PM
That is a crazy shot for Dex, insane detail.
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 05:43:14 PM
dex looks great there.

Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 05:43:56 PM
Aside from Ronnie, who beats this?  Of course, he still has to contend with Jay on back shots.

 ;)
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Pollux on September 27, 2008, 05:45:37 PM
Aside from Ronnie, who beats this?  Of course, he still has to contend with Jay on back shots.

Which Dexter does and even surpasses! Dexter's my dawg!  8)
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 05:59:19 PM
;)

 ::)

your pathetic attempt to put down ronnie in his signature pose fails as always.

roland needs way more detail and triceps before he can top Ronnie's mm.
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: pumpster on September 27, 2008, 06:01:06 PM
 :o
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:02:59 PM
::)

your pathetic attempt to put down ronnie in his signature pose fails as always.

roland needs way more detail and triceps before he can top Ronnie's mm.

who said I was putting down Ronnie's mm?  ;) Ronnie's chest pales in comparison to Roland the difference is night & day
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:04:16 PM
:o

Ha Ha Ha another jerk-off who has Yates burned into his brain , who mentioned Dorian?  ;) thanks for playing which guy would mention Yates' first

Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:07:49 PM
 ;)
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 06:08:55 PM
who said I was putting down Ronnie's mm?  ;) Ronnie's chest pales in comparison to Roland the difference is night & day

you tried to post a pic of ronnie vs someone who you THOUGHT (incorrectly as always) had a better mm because of the title of the thread.

don't think we are stupid enough to not see what you were trying to do ::).
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 06:10:05 PM
;)

exactly. Rolands arms and delts have little detail and shape compared to Ronnie's and he has no tris in comparison.

now do you see that he is not even close, soccer mom and thread highjacker?

 ::)
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:11:12 PM
you tried to post a pic of ronnie vs someone who you THOUGHT (incorrectly as always) had a better mm because of the title of the thread.

don't think we are stupid enough to not see what you were trying to do ::).


I love your pleas to the masses ' we ' you're a retard proven by the best photog on the business  ;)

as usual YOU pick what you like in a pose while ignoring others clear advantages

Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:12:39 PM
exactly. Rolands arms and delts have little detail and shape compared to Ronnie's and he has no tris in comparison.

now do you see that he is not even close, soccer mom and thread highjacker?

 ::)

HA HA HA HA delts have little detail among your dumbest statements , stick to Ronnie ball-licking because you don't know the first thing about competitive bodybuilding fan-boy
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:13:54 PM
Kevin Levrone (hands together)
Dennis Wolf (apart)

Ha Ha Ha so much for Ronnie's great MM he's getting crushed by Wolf lol and Yates
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: m8 on September 27, 2008, 06:15:33 PM
(http://www.musclememory.com/magCovers/md/md3809.jpg)
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:15:38 PM
HULKSTER


what do you say to this?  ;D

what can he say? NOTHING Wolf is crushing Ronnie
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 06:17:29 PM
Ha Ha Ha so much for Ronnie's great MM he's getting crushed by Wolf lol and Yates

yeah, sure he is. nice detail on dorian's left arm. does he even train it? ::)
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: io856 on September 27, 2008, 06:17:54 PM
One thing that is amazing with ronnie is the detail and hardness in his arms, some pros like phil heath and dennis james it just looks like blobs of big muscle
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 06:19:35 PM
one thing that is amazing with ronnie is the detail in his arms some pros like phil heath and dennis james it just looks like blobs of big muscle

yup. its stuff like this that Soccer Mom ND cannot understand.

luckily everyone else including the judges (who made ronnie the winningest bb ever) do.
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 27, 2008, 06:20:57 PM
yup. its stuff like this that Soccer Mom ND cannot understand.

luckily everyone else including the judges (who made ronnie the winningest bb ever) do.


 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:21:26 PM
yeah, sure he is. nice detail on dorian's left arm. does he even train it? ::)

could be worse  ;) can't see these iin a MM LMFAO where is the detail? which YOU claim he has more of compared to Dorian

OWNED
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:24:08 PM
yup. its stuff like this that Soccer Mom ND cannot understand.

luckily everyone else including the judges (who made ronnie the winningest bb ever) do.

Again YOU pick and choose what YOU like in a pose , calves matter , forearms matter , abdominals matter , balance & proportion matter , density & dryness matter everything matters NOT just what you like

Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: io856 on September 27, 2008, 06:24:08 PM

 ;D ;D ;D
Ronnie is absolutely crushing Wolf there, see hardness and detail. Do you see any striations on Wolf? Ronnie is from another planet in that shot.
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 06:24:19 PM

 ;D ;D ;D

ronnie owns wolf and ronnie 2006 :)
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: myt1 on September 27, 2008, 06:26:39 PM
::)

your pathetic attempt to put down ronnie in his signature pose fails as always.

roland needs way more detail and triceps before he can top Ronnie's mm.

Roland was in one of the last Arnold Classics to be on ESPN.  I still have it on video tape somewhere.  After his routine he went backstage, and they interviewed him.  The guy couldn't speak for shit, but he understood when the guy asked him to hit some shots.  Up close it was one of the freakiest most musculars I've ever seen.  Striated like crazy and dry as fuck! 8)
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:26:48 PM
Ronnie is absolutely crushing Wolf there, see hardness and detail. Do you see any striations on Wolf? Ronnie is from another planet in that shot.

LMFAO hardness and detail , he's soft which is part of the reason why he was FOURTH PLACE lmfao Wlof is making Ronnie look petite
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:27:37 PM
ronnie owns wolf and ronnie 2006 :)

That Version would look just as small next to Wolf period .
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: m8 on September 27, 2008, 06:28:52 PM
Ronnie is absolutely crushing Wolf there, see hardness and detail. Do you see any striations on Wolf? Ronnie is from another planet in that shot.

If you think Ronnie is beating Wolf in that shot you seriously need to go get your eyes checked.
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:29:33 PM
Roland was in one of the last Arnold Classics to be on ESPN.  I still have it on video tape somewhere.  After his routine he went backstage, and they interviewed him.  The guy couldn't speak for shit, but he understood when the guy asked him to hit some shots.  Up close it was one of the freakiest most musculars I've ever seen.  Striated like crazy and dry as fuck! 8)

Great post ! I seen Roland at the 1994 Olympia his MM is sick
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 06:30:10 PM
That Version would look just as small next to Wolf period .

wolf's chest as as much detail as an ice rink, and you think he wins the pose? LOL

 ::)
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:30:46 PM
If you think Ronnie is beating Wolf in that shot you seriously need to go get your eyes checked.

No kidding me makes the 275 pound Ronnie look very small and he was lucky if he was 260 himself !!
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Big_Tymer on September 27, 2008, 06:31:05 PM
so pathetic, look at dorians peashooter left arm here  ::)
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:32:05 PM
wolf's chest as as much detail as an ice rink, and you think he wins the pose? LOL

 ::)

You always tried this dumb shit when comparing Yates , detail doesn't make-up for the fact he looks like a child next to Wolf , any detail is negated its a small part in the big picture , stop cherry picking.
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 27, 2008, 06:32:20 PM
 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:33:15 PM
so pathetic, look at dorians peashooter left arm here  ::)

Same photoshoot , pea-shooter? yeah I thought so guy  ;)

Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: io856 on September 27, 2008, 06:33:18 PM
Again YOU pick and choose what YOU like in a pose , calves matter , forearms matter , abdominals matter , balance & proportion matter , density & dryness matter everything matters NOT just what you like



You always tried this dumb shit when comparing Yates , detail doesn't make-up for the fact he looks like a child next to Wolf , any detail is negated its a small part in the big picture , stop cherry picking.

 ;D
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:33:56 PM
;D ;D ;D

Ha Ha Ha Ha Ronnie and his pregnant belly getting owned again
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 27, 2008, 06:35:07 PM
wolf's chest as as much detail as an ice rink, and you think he wins the pose? LOL

 ::)
how much detail does the GUT have?
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:36:46 PM
how much detail does the GUT have?

He looks tiny next to him , Wolf is much light and looks WAY bigger thats what happens when you have a superior structure
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 27, 2008, 06:38:25 PM
He looks tiny next to him , Wolf is much light and looks WAY bigger thats what happens when you have a superior structure
wasn't ronnie like 297 ripped?
and wolf 245?
over 50 pounds of muscle and it looks like wolf is the one with more muscle 
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:40:40 PM
wasn't ronnie like 297 ripped?
and wolf 245?
over 50 pounds of muscle and it looks like wolf is the one with more muscle 
  in 06 I think he was like 280 and Wolf was like 255 or 260 and looking at that pic you think Wolf is much , much bigger
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 06:43:54 PM
LOL look at the (lack of) detail in Wolf's chest, lack of triceps, flat biceps etc and ND claims it doesnt matter LOL

 ::) ::) ::) ::)

this guy gets more and more stupid every day :-\

why post on a bb message board if you know nothing about it? :-\
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 27, 2008, 06:45:45 PM
LOL look at the (lack of) detail in Wolf's chest, lack of triceps, flat biceps etc and ND claims it doesnt matter LOL

 ::) ::) ::) ::)

this guy gets more and more stupid every day :-\

why post on a bb message board if you know nothing about it? :-\
dude, even jay cutler and dexter jackson said that Wolf has the best MM pose today, so just drop it  ;D
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 06:46:15 PM
look everyone! it doesn't matter! LOL

 ::) ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 27, 2008, 06:46:22 PM
Hulkster and ND
how do you guys explain
Dorian Yates's and Ronnie Coleman's pregnant guts?
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 27, 2008, 06:47:17 PM
look everyone! it doesn't matter! LOL

 ::) ::) ::) ::)

nope sure doesn't  ;D
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 06:47:28 PM
dude, even jay cutler and dexter jackson said that Wolf has the best MM pose today, so just drop it  ;D

yes. today. not ever. the topic of the thread made reference to the fact that Ronnie Coleman has a mm that is unbeatable, and we are verifying that fact quite nicely...
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 06:48:51 PM
Hulkster and ND
how do you guys explain
Dorian Yates's and Ronnie Coleman's pregnant guts?


they both got guts in the quest for unneccesary size.
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:49:52 PM
LOL look at the (lack of) detail in Wolf's chest, lack of triceps, flat biceps etc and ND claims it doesnt matter LOL

 ::) ::) ::) ::)

this guy gets more and more stupid every day :-\

why post on a bb message board if you know nothing about it? :-\


Where did I say? It didn't matter? please show me the exact quote you liar , I said you focus on that while ignoring the rest thats called cherry picking , its what you do because you're ignorant

all rounds are physique rounds retard ALL of the criteria is applied in each and every pose NOT just what YOU like or what YOU think wins a pose , what good is more detail when you're getting out sized by a much lighter guy? compared to Dorian what good is more detailed arms when your guy is protruding and totally lacking in detail and calves that look like they belong a Ms Olympia contestant LMFAO

all rounds are physique rounds retard learn it

Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 06:52:02 PM
LOL

sorry wolf fans:
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:53:13 PM
they both got guts in the quest for unneccesary size.

LMFAO Dorian carried his size without getting soggy like Coleman , the difference in midsections in night & day , what good does have a narrower waist & hips when your serrattus , intercostals , obliques and abdominals all suck? LMFAO
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 06:53:57 PM
Quote
I said you focus on that while ignoring the rest thats called cherry picking , its what you do because you're ignorant

yeah, because focusing on the lack of triceps, zero chest detail, zero delt detail, poor biceps in comparison to ronnie is 'cherry picking' LOL

 ::) ::) ::)

don't your kids have a soccer game to go to?
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:54:30 PM
LOL

sorry wolf fans:

So he posts his photoshopped screencaps LMFAO

Wolf-induced-meltdown
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 06:55:01 PM
Quote
LMFAO Dorian carried his size without getting soggy like Coleman
yeah, not saggy at all.. ::)

your late for your game ND.

you should go and save yourself all this utter embarassment:
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: m8 on September 27, 2008, 06:55:10 PM
LOL

sorry wolf fans:

Second shot is from when he was still an amateur.
It's as if I posted this shot:

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/20038-4/german-gp-1994-12.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=594de358b2311598cd38fe1b6d4699d5)

even though Ronnie is a "pro" there LOL
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:55:46 PM
yeah, because focusing on the lack of triceps, zero chest detail, zero delt detail, poor biceps in comparison to ronnie is 'cherry picking' LOL

 ::) ::) ::)

don't your kids have a soccer game to go to?

you're so pathetic you can't stick to the topic because as usual you're getting your ass kicked and you're reduced to personal attacks LMFAO you're a joke

Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 06:57:01 PM
So he posts his photoshopped screencaps LMFAO

Wolf-induced-meltdown

yeah, they're really photoshopped. ::)

why dont you get your friend Kevin to help you post in this thread LOL

oh yeah, he's gone because I owned him..
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:57:36 PM
yeah, not saggy at all.. ::)

your late for your game ND.

you should go and save yourself all this utter embarassment:

Ha Ha Ha Ha your frustration level is showing fan-boy  ;) posting a relaxed pic of Yates proves what? how lame you are

Ronnie 99 soft as a babies ass
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:58:29 PM
yeah, they're really photoshopped. ::)

why dont you get your friend Kevin to help you post in this thread LOL

oh yeah, he's gone because I owned him..


PHOTOSHOPPED pics , relaxed shots of Dorian , cherry-picking the criteria lol

Hulkster = sad
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 06:59:50 PM
narcissticdeity
you're a chick?  ???

That's Hulkster angle he wishes he was half the man I am  ;) all he has is lame retorts
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 07:01:27 PM
Second shot is from when he was still an amateur.
It's as if I posted this shot:

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/20038-4/german-gp-1994-12.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=594de358b2311598cd38fe1b6d4699d5)

even though Ronnie is a "pro" there LOL

LMFAO Hulkster has been reduced to posting pics of Wolf as an amatuer? what a queer
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 07:02:59 PM
narcissticdeity
you're a chick?  ???

yup. he's a stay at home mom. LOL

many on the board think so. 8)

and it was NOT suggested by me.

but I agree with the theory.

it makes perfect sense..
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 27, 2008, 07:04:06 PM
  Jean-Pierre Fux has arguably the best crab shot ever. At 280 lbs, he had supreme thickness, width and incredibly round muscle bellies. Unlike Ronnie's crab shot, where the arms overpower the pecs and traps, Fux's crab shot was perfectly balanced.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 07:06:04 PM
yup. he's a stay at home mom. LOL

I love how you crack yourself up  ::) ad homieum attacks are the sign of the intellectually bankrupt and we all know you're a retard its bad when professional contest photographers call you that LMFAO
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 07:12:38 PM
wow thats kind of desperate  :-\

Hey what can he do? he can't compete on a intellectual level he has to reduce himself to such nonsense , everyone knows me and Dorian own his mind , he never recovered


P.I.P Hulkster  :'(
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: divcom on September 27, 2008, 07:17:02 PM
Make sure Wolf can win one or at least beat Heath, Vic and Dex before comparing him to an 8 time or 6 time MrO.  More GetDumb at it's best. 
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 07:19:50 PM
Make sure Wolf can win one or at least beat Heath, Vic and Dex before comparing him to an 8 time or 6 time MrO.  More GetDumb at it's best. 

yup. thats ND for ya. ::)
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 07:21:35 PM
yup. thats ND for ya. ::)

lmfao keep typing my name ball licker


8 time Mr Olympia getting his ass handed to him in his ' own ' pose by a much lighter guy

Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: England_1 on September 27, 2008, 07:25:30 PM
Ronnie just doesn't have the structure to compete with Wolf in this pose. Wolf is exposing Ronnie's narrow shoulders. Unfortunately for Hulkster, this shot of Ronnie looks no different than 99. LOL.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=237603.0;attach=277501;image)
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 27, 2008, 07:27:03 PM
Ronnie just doesn't have the structure to compete with Wolf in this pose. Wolf is exposing Ronnie's narrow shoulders. Unfortunately for Hulkster, this shot of Ronnie looks no different than 99. LOL.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=237603.0;attach=277501;image)

Ha Ha Ha so true he gets murdered in the 1/4 turns to very hard to believe Wolf is much lighter than Ronnie when in fact he looks much bigger
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 07:36:43 PM
its funny how you guys are so proud that Wolf is beating a 2007 Ronnie Coleman, when wolf doesn't even come CLOSE to a Ronnie Coleman 1998, 1999 or 2001...

 ::)
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 07:42:28 PM
this is just too easy!

wolf doesn't even beat an ageing Ronnie never mind a prime one!:

 ::) ::)
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 07:43:23 PM
LOL look at how shitty Wolf's arms are!

no wonder they look so bad the mm!

his biceps SUCK!

Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: England_1 on September 27, 2008, 07:47:13 PM
Wolf shits on Ronnie, absolutely dwarfs him.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=237603.0;attach=277532;image)
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: pumpster on September 27, 2008, 07:49:00 PM
LMFAO hardness and detail , he's soft

Let's see the keg has zero size and barely any cuts lol :-[ Yates neck and neck with Haney for worst all-time MM.
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: England_1 on September 27, 2008, 07:53:20 PM
Let's see the keg has zero size and barely any cuts lol :-[ Yates neck and neck with Haney for worst all-time MM.

You come in here and TROLL as usual.....cuz Coleman is getting pwned  :-*

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=237603.0;attach=277532;image)
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Get Rowdy on September 27, 2008, 08:32:59 PM
Ronnie's glute in this pic is fuckin disturbing.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=237603.0;attach=277546;image)
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 08:42:21 PM
Ronnie's glute in this pic is fuckin disturbing.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=237603.0;attach=277546;image)

so are Wolf's arms.. :-\
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: England_1 on September 27, 2008, 08:43:02 PM
Hulkster loves Coleman's giant ass and AIDS quads LMFAO
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 27, 2008, 08:53:04 PM
so are Wolf's arms.. :-\
is that photo of coleman photoshopped?
LOOK AT COLEMAN'S ASS
AHAHHAHHAHAHHAHHA
what the FUCK
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Get Rowdy on September 27, 2008, 08:54:05 PM
Honestly, from that angle it looks like a tumor.
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 27, 2008, 09:00:15 PM
Honestly, from that angle it looks like a tumor.
seriously WTF IS THAT
is it a tumor?
or does ronnie have the typical african american J-LO ass  ;D
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 09:00:36 PM
Hulkster loves Coleman's giant ass and AIDS quads LMFAO

oh the irony coming from you....  ::)
Title: Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
Post by: Hulkster on September 27, 2008, 09:02:27 PM
is that photo of coleman photoshopped?


did ND post it?