Author Topic: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)  (Read 18955 times)

myt1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4275
  • Getbig!
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #25 on: September 27, 2008, 06:26:39 PM »
::)

your pathetic attempt to put down ronnie in his signature pose fails as always.

roland needs way more detail and triceps before he can top Ronnie's mm.

Roland was in one of the last Arnold Classics to be on ESPN.  I still have it on video tape somewhere.  After his routine he went backstage, and they interviewed him.  The guy couldn't speak for shit, but he understood when the guy asked him to hit some shots.  Up close it was one of the freakiest most musculars I've ever seen.  Striated like crazy and dry as fuck! 8)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83331
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #26 on: September 27, 2008, 06:26:48 PM »
Ronnie is absolutely crushing Wolf there, see hardness and detail. Do you see any striations on Wolf? Ronnie is from another planet in that shot.

LMFAO hardness and detail , he's soft which is part of the reason why he was FOURTH PLACE lmfao Wlof is making Ronnie look petite

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83331
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #27 on: September 27, 2008, 06:27:37 PM »
ronnie owns wolf and ronnie 2006 :)

That Version would look just as small next to Wolf period .

m8

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10796
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #28 on: September 27, 2008, 06:28:52 PM »
Ronnie is absolutely crushing Wolf there, see hardness and detail. Do you see any striations on Wolf? Ronnie is from another planet in that shot.

If you think Ronnie is beating Wolf in that shot you seriously need to go get your eyes checked.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83331
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #29 on: September 27, 2008, 06:29:33 PM »
Roland was in one of the last Arnold Classics to be on ESPN.  I still have it on video tape somewhere.  After his routine he went backstage, and they interviewed him.  The guy couldn't speak for shit, but he understood when the guy asked him to hit some shots.  Up close it was one of the freakiest most musculars I've ever seen.  Striated like crazy and dry as fuck! 8)

Great post ! I seen Roland at the 1994 Olympia his MM is sick

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #30 on: September 27, 2008, 06:30:10 PM »
That Version would look just as small next to Wolf period .

wolf's chest as as much detail as an ice rink, and you think he wins the pose? LOL

 ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83331
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #31 on: September 27, 2008, 06:30:46 PM »
If you think Ronnie is beating Wolf in that shot you seriously need to go get your eyes checked.

No kidding me makes the 275 pound Ronnie look very small and he was lucky if he was 260 himself !!

Big_Tymer

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1875
  • Team Huge Aryan Bastards With Muscle
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #32 on: September 27, 2008, 06:31:05 PM »
so pathetic, look at dorians peashooter left arm here  ::)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83331
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #33 on: September 27, 2008, 06:32:05 PM »
wolf's chest as as much detail as an ice rink, and you think he wins the pose? LOL

 ::)

You always tried this dumb shit when comparing Yates , detail doesn't make-up for the fact he looks like a child next to Wolf , any detail is negated its a small part in the big picture , stop cherry picking.

ASJChaotic

  • Guest
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #34 on: September 27, 2008, 06:32:20 PM »
 ;D ;D ;D

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83331
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #35 on: September 27, 2008, 06:33:15 PM »
so pathetic, look at dorians peashooter left arm here  ::)

Same photoshoot , pea-shooter? yeah I thought so guy  ;)


io856

  • Guest
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #36 on: September 27, 2008, 06:33:18 PM »
Again YOU pick and choose what YOU like in a pose , calves matter , forearms matter , abdominals matter , balance & proportion matter , density & dryness matter everything matters NOT just what you like



You always tried this dumb shit when comparing Yates , detail doesn't make-up for the fact he looks like a child next to Wolf , any detail is negated its a small part in the big picture , stop cherry picking.

 ;D

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83331
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #37 on: September 27, 2008, 06:33:56 PM »
;D ;D ;D

Ha Ha Ha Ha Ronnie and his pregnant belly getting owned again

ASJChaotic

  • Guest
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #38 on: September 27, 2008, 06:35:07 PM »
wolf's chest as as much detail as an ice rink, and you think he wins the pose? LOL

 ::)
how much detail does the GUT have?

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83331
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #39 on: September 27, 2008, 06:36:46 PM »
how much detail does the GUT have?

He looks tiny next to him , Wolf is much light and looks WAY bigger thats what happens when you have a superior structure

ASJChaotic

  • Guest
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #40 on: September 27, 2008, 06:38:25 PM »
He looks tiny next to him , Wolf is much light and looks WAY bigger thats what happens when you have a superior structure
wasn't ronnie like 297 ripped?
and wolf 245?
over 50 pounds of muscle and it looks like wolf is the one with more muscle 

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83331
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #41 on: September 27, 2008, 06:40:40 PM »
wasn't ronnie like 297 ripped?
and wolf 245?
over 50 pounds of muscle and it looks like wolf is the one with more muscle 
  in 06 I think he was like 280 and Wolf was like 255 or 260 and looking at that pic you think Wolf is much , much bigger

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #42 on: September 27, 2008, 06:43:54 PM »
LOL look at the (lack of) detail in Wolf's chest, lack of triceps, flat biceps etc and ND claims it doesnt matter LOL

 ::) ::) ::) ::)

this guy gets more and more stupid every day :-\

why post on a bb message board if you know nothing about it? :-\
Flower Boy Ran Away

ASJChaotic

  • Guest
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #43 on: September 27, 2008, 06:45:45 PM »
LOL look at the (lack of) detail in Wolf's chest, lack of triceps, flat biceps etc and ND claims it doesnt matter LOL

 ::) ::) ::) ::)

this guy gets more and more stupid every day :-\

why post on a bb message board if you know nothing about it? :-\
dude, even jay cutler and dexter jackson said that Wolf has the best MM pose today, so just drop it  ;D

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #44 on: September 27, 2008, 06:46:15 PM »
look everyone! it doesn't matter! LOL

 ::) ::) ::) ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

ASJChaotic

  • Guest
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #45 on: September 27, 2008, 06:46:22 PM »
Hulkster and ND
how do you guys explain
Dorian Yates's and Ronnie Coleman's pregnant guts?

ASJChaotic

  • Guest
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #46 on: September 27, 2008, 06:47:17 PM »
look everyone! it doesn't matter! LOL

 ::) ::) ::) ::)

nope sure doesn't  ;D

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #47 on: September 27, 2008, 06:47:28 PM »
dude, even jay cutler and dexter jackson said that Wolf has the best MM pose today, so just drop it  ;D

yes. today. not ever. the topic of the thread made reference to the fact that Ronnie Coleman has a mm that is unbeatable, and we are verifying that fact quite nicely...
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #48 on: September 27, 2008, 06:48:51 PM »
Hulkster and ND
how do you guys explain
Dorian Yates's and Ronnie Coleman's pregnant guts?


they both got guts in the quest for unneccesary size.
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83331
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Best Most Muscular in history (not named Ronnie Coleman?)
« Reply #49 on: September 27, 2008, 06:49:52 PM »
LOL look at the (lack of) detail in Wolf's chest, lack of triceps, flat biceps etc and ND claims it doesnt matter LOL

 ::) ::) ::) ::)

this guy gets more and more stupid every day :-\

why post on a bb message board if you know nothing about it? :-\


Where did I say? It didn't matter? please show me the exact quote you liar , I said you focus on that while ignoring the rest thats called cherry picking , its what you do because you're ignorant

all rounds are physique rounds retard ALL of the criteria is applied in each and every pose NOT just what YOU like or what YOU think wins a pose , what good is more detail when you're getting out sized by a much lighter guy? compared to Dorian what good is more detailed arms when your guy is protruding and totally lacking in detail and calves that look like they belong a Ms Olympia contestant LMFAO

all rounds are physique rounds retard learn it