Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: England_1 on September 28, 2008, 12:34:08 AM

Title: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: England_1 on September 28, 2008, 12:34:08 AM
move over Ronnie

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/46029-3/2008-mr-olympia-58.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=42c30859f57b3ad48defad0c482a2fae)

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/46045-3/2008-mr-olympia-62.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=42c30859f57b3ad48defad0c482a2fae)
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: johnny1 on September 28, 2008, 12:41:56 AM
 :o :o :o
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: Get Rowdy on September 28, 2008, 12:43:32 AM
Wish I had some.
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: TechnoViking on September 28, 2008, 12:46:51 AM
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: IFBBwannaB on September 28, 2008, 12:52:16 AM

Looks AMAZING here!
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: Mars on September 28, 2008, 01:04:05 AM
how can he lose from that tiny bitch dexter?
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: bodybuilder1234 on September 28, 2008, 01:39:33 AM
he must of improved leaps and bounds from prejudging to the nightshow to beat Tony Freeman
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: Veteran_Lifter on September 28, 2008, 01:41:20 AM
how can he lose from that tiny bitch dexter?

Let me guess, you're 5'11 and 1/2?
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: andrus on September 28, 2008, 01:47:15 AM
Let me guess, you're 5'11 and 1/2?

Let me guess, you're 5'3''? :D
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: Mars on September 28, 2008, 01:52:19 AM
Let me guess, you're 5'11 and 1/2?

hi dexter.
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: Parker on September 28, 2008, 01:54:08 AM
move over Ronnie

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/46029-3/2008-mr-olympia-58.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=42c30859f57b3ad48defad0c482a2fae)

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/46045-3/2008-mr-olympia-62.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=42c30859f57b3ad48defad0c482a2fae)

Not even close to Ronnie, even back in his 1997 Arnold and Olympia form.
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: Veteran_Lifter on September 28, 2008, 01:57:20 AM
Not even close to Ronnie, even back in his 1997 Arnold and Olympia form.

More appropriately, not even close to Wolf.  After all, 1997 Ronnie was not at Wolf's level either.
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: Meso_z on September 28, 2008, 02:16:14 AM
I think Wolf should work on his own now, no gurus needed.
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: Parker on September 28, 2008, 02:18:13 AM
More appropriately, not even close to Wolf.  After all, 1997 Ronnie was not at Wolf's level either.

Hey, Vet I think you need to go dig up some pics especially from the 1997 Arnold and O. Yes, flex won the Arnold at 224 pounds, beating a 275 Nasser, but I believe Ronnie was 5th, and he was under-rated, he had the same back detail that he when he won in 1998. And in the O he was overlooked. ND has pics of Ronnie from the back (they were in the back of Flex Mag), Wolf has a huge missing space in his lower back. Wolf cannot come close to when Ronnie was winning, he can't, he is Dennis Wolfe and has to what Dennis Wolfe has. He's wide, but his delts, arms are flatish. He's got good conditioning and great detail within the quads, but he could only best the Ronnie of last yr. If Flex couldn't a Prime Ronnie, then you damn sure know a Dennis Wolfe couldn't either.
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: io856 on September 28, 2008, 02:20:23 AM
Is "vascularity" a desirable trait in bodybuilding?

Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: Bobby on September 28, 2008, 09:52:16 AM
put heaths arms on wolf and you have a mr O
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: The Coach on September 28, 2008, 09:55:26 AM
Vacularity doesn't win contests.
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: FreedomFighter on September 28, 2008, 09:59:44 AM
wish if wolf did his homework right :-[
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: JohnnyVegas on September 28, 2008, 10:02:58 AM
Not even close to Ronnie, even back in his 1997 Arnold and Olympia form.

Blows Rionnie in the dust.
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: nicorulez on September 28, 2008, 10:35:21 AM
Blows Rionnie in the dust.

You are most certainly an idiot. That is laughable. Comparing Wolf to a prime Coleman is like comparing a national level high school football team to the Patriots or Cowboys.  ::)
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: Earl1972 on September 28, 2008, 10:40:27 AM
just in the arms and shoulders

E
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: liberalismo on September 28, 2008, 12:13:40 PM
In my opinion, high vascularity like this simply gets in the way of actually seeing the muscles. When someone has a lot of large veins popping out everywhere, then it's difficult to even see the muscles themselves. It's not a very desirable trait.
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: JohnnyVegas on September 28, 2008, 07:51:11 PM
You are most certainly an idiot. That is laughable. Comparing Wolf to a prime Coleman is like comparing a national level high school football team to the Patriots or Cowboys.  ::)

And Ronnie is the HS team and Wolf is the Patriots.  :D
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: m8 on September 28, 2008, 07:54:43 PM
The great Wolfenstein looks GREAT on that shot.
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: jude2 on September 28, 2008, 08:26:39 PM
Vacularity doesn't win contests.
Correct, but at least is shows he dosen't have oil in his arms.
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: Get Rowdy on September 28, 2008, 08:27:37 PM
Vascularity like that would make him look even freakier in person.
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: hazbin on September 28, 2008, 08:48:44 PM
In my opinion, high vascularity like this simply gets in the way of actually seeing the muscles. When someone has a lot of large veins popping out everywhere, then it's difficult to even see the muscles themselves. It's not a very desirable trait.

true story!!!
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: Big Worm on September 28, 2008, 10:02:29 PM
move over Ronnie

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/46029-3/2008-mr-olympia-58.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=42c30859f57b3ad48defad0c482a2fae)

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/46045-3/2008-mr-olympia-62.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=42c30859f57b3ad48defad0c482a2fae)
You must be retarded? Wolf couldn't match Ronnies off season vascularity ..
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: johnny1 on September 28, 2008, 10:08:07 PM
Correct, but at least is shows he dosen't have oil in his arms.
X2
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: England_1 on September 28, 2008, 10:11:41 PM
That's getbig's own Hazbin, right? Fucking awesome! I love vascularity.
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: hazbin on September 28, 2008, 11:44:27 PM
Vascularity like that would make him look even freakier in person.

two potential problems with extreme vascularity are:  it can blur your definition, and it gives you a false sense of conditioning. i.e. people are always telling you you are shredded when you may still have bodyfat to lose.

that being said, i think Wolf was one of the best conditioned on stage and i cant understand how he doesn't place higher.
Title: Re: insane vascularity on wolf
Post by: Jeffro on September 29, 2008, 12:24:28 AM
two potential problems with extreme vascularity are:  it can blur your definition, and it gives you a false sense of conditioning. i.e. people are always telling you you are shredded when you may still have bodyfat to lose.

that being said, i think Wolf was one of the best conditioned on stage and i cant understand how he doesn't place higher.
That's fucking ridiculous. :o :o