Author Topic: insane vascularity on wolf  (Read 6685 times)

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
insane vascularity on wolf
« on: September 28, 2008, 12:34:08 AM »
move over Ronnie



Team Yates

johnny1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2486
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2008, 12:41:56 AM »
 :o :o :o

Get Rowdy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1704
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #2 on: September 28, 2008, 12:43:32 AM »
Wish I had some.

TechnoViking

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4518
  • Too weird to live, too rare to die...----HST
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #3 on: September 28, 2008, 12:46:51 AM »

IFBBwannaB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4538
  • BAN stick!
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #4 on: September 28, 2008, 12:52:16 AM »

Looks AMAZING here!

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #5 on: September 28, 2008, 01:04:05 AM »
how can he lose from that tiny bitch dexter?

bodybuilder1234

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3749
  • Manny Pacquiao KO Floyd 1
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #6 on: September 28, 2008, 01:39:33 AM »
he must of improved leaps and bounds from prejudging to the nightshow to beat Tony Freeman

Veteran_Lifter

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 385
  • haha
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #7 on: September 28, 2008, 01:41:20 AM »
how can he lose from that tiny bitch dexter?

Let me guess, you're 5'11 and 1/2?

andrus

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 54
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #8 on: September 28, 2008, 01:47:15 AM »
Let me guess, you're 5'11 and 1/2?

Let me guess, you're 5'3''? :D

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #9 on: September 28, 2008, 01:52:19 AM »
Let me guess, you're 5'11 and 1/2?

hi dexter.

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #10 on: September 28, 2008, 01:54:08 AM »
move over Ronnie





Not even close to Ronnie, even back in his 1997 Arnold and Olympia form.

Veteran_Lifter

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 385
  • haha
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #11 on: September 28, 2008, 01:57:20 AM »
Not even close to Ronnie, even back in his 1997 Arnold and Olympia form.

More appropriately, not even close to Wolf.  After all, 1997 Ronnie was not at Wolf's level either.

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #12 on: September 28, 2008, 02:16:14 AM »
I think Wolf should work on his own now, no gurus needed.

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #13 on: September 28, 2008, 02:18:13 AM »
More appropriately, not even close to Wolf.  After all, 1997 Ronnie was not at Wolf's level either.

Hey, Vet I think you need to go dig up some pics especially from the 1997 Arnold and O. Yes, flex won the Arnold at 224 pounds, beating a 275 Nasser, but I believe Ronnie was 5th, and he was under-rated, he had the same back detail that he when he won in 1998. And in the O he was overlooked. ND has pics of Ronnie from the back (they were in the back of Flex Mag), Wolf has a huge missing space in his lower back. Wolf cannot come close to when Ronnie was winning, he can't, he is Dennis Wolfe and has to what Dennis Wolfe has. He's wide, but his delts, arms are flatish. He's got good conditioning and great detail within the quads, but he could only best the Ronnie of last yr. If Flex couldn't a Prime Ronnie, then you damn sure know a Dennis Wolfe couldn't either.

io856

  • Guest
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #14 on: September 28, 2008, 02:20:23 AM »
Is "vascularity" a desirable trait in bodybuilding?


Bobby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5219
  • is da lordes plan
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #15 on: September 28, 2008, 09:52:16 AM »
put heaths arms on wolf and you have a mr O
tank u jesus

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #16 on: September 28, 2008, 09:55:26 AM »
Vacularity doesn't win contests.

FreedomFighter

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 823
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #17 on: September 28, 2008, 09:59:44 AM »
wish if wolf did his homework right :-[

JohnnyVegas

  • Guest
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #18 on: September 28, 2008, 10:02:58 AM »
Not even close to Ronnie, even back in his 1997 Arnold and Olympia form.

Blows Rionnie in the dust.

nicorulez

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1674
  • Getbig!
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #19 on: September 28, 2008, 10:35:21 AM »
Blows Rionnie in the dust.

You are most certainly an idiot. That is laughable. Comparing Wolf to a prime Coleman is like comparing a national level high school football team to the Patriots or Cowboys.  ::)

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22062
  • #EarlToo
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #20 on: September 28, 2008, 10:40:27 AM »
just in the arms and shoulders

E
E

liberalismo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1335
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #21 on: September 28, 2008, 12:13:40 PM »
In my opinion, high vascularity like this simply gets in the way of actually seeing the muscles. When someone has a lot of large veins popping out everywhere, then it's difficult to even see the muscles themselves. It's not a very desirable trait.

JohnnyVegas

  • Guest
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #22 on: September 28, 2008, 07:51:11 PM »
You are most certainly an idiot. That is laughable. Comparing Wolf to a prime Coleman is like comparing a national level high school football team to the Patriots or Cowboys.  ::)

And Ronnie is the HS team and Wolf is the Patriots.  :D

m8

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10794
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #23 on: September 28, 2008, 07:54:43 PM »
The great Wolfenstein looks GREAT on that shot.

jude2

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11025
  • Getbig!
Re: insane vascularity on wolf
« Reply #24 on: September 28, 2008, 08:26:39 PM »
Vacularity doesn't win contests.
Correct, but at least is shows he dosen't have oil in his arms.