Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Canadian_Muscle on December 11, 2008, 03:14:49 AM

Title: Mike Mentzer
Post by: Canadian_Muscle on December 11, 2008, 03:14:49 AM
The most badass 'stache in bodybuilding
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: Canadian_Muscle on December 11, 2008, 03:15:45 AM
...
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: Canadian_Muscle on December 11, 2008, 03:16:50 AM
...
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: Canadian_Muscle on December 11, 2008, 03:18:07 AM
...
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: Canadian_Muscle on December 11, 2008, 03:19:10 AM
Mike gettin' ready to kick some twinks off the benchpress
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: LatsMcGee on December 11, 2008, 03:21:37 AM
ALL METH.
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: MuscleMcMannus on December 11, 2008, 03:25:32 AM
Mentzer just had strong ass, solid look to him.  Completely different than Arnold's.  Kind of like the difference between German and American breeds of certain dogs.  One much more elegant the other much more muscular and square.  Mentzer would have kicked the shit out of Arnold too.  That pic of him in backstage pointing his finger at Arnold, lol, you can see the fear on Arnold's face.  I wish Mike would have punched Arnold in his arrogant stupid face. 
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: New Hank Wood on December 11, 2008, 03:28:07 AM
Mike loved to indulge.  He enjoyed all varieties of illicit substances.  And yes, he had issues with alcohol and cigarettes as well.

Mike died a tormented and twisted soul.  His legacy is quite unimpressive; a whiny voice, a grotesque moustache, track marks, a vile breath and a huge library of purile philosophy literature.

It is true that Mike despised Arnold.  Many belief that his deep and bitter hatred of the great man is in part, responsible for his early and predictable death.
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: basurablanco on December 11, 2008, 03:30:40 AM
My waist is bigger than his  ;D
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: New Hank Wood on December 11, 2008, 03:40:11 AM
Mike was a lunatic.  Arnold and co. just tolerated him.  What else can be done but to humour this nutcase.

Mike, let Arnold and all his achievments totally consume him.  Yes, Arnold had all the pussy, money, fame and popularity. 

And what did Mike have?  Hmmmm.  Well, he stole the H.I.T priciples and called them his own and became a worthless drug addict.

Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: Gino30 on December 11, 2008, 03:56:31 AM
Mike was a lunatic.  Arnold and co. just tolerated him.  What else can be done but to humour this nutcase.

Mike, let Arnold and all his achievments totally consume him.  Yes, Arnold had all the pussy, money, fame and popularity. 

And what did Mike have?  Hmmmm.  Well, he stole the H.I.T priciples and called them his own and became a worthless drug addict.



Your eulogy at Mike's funeral?
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: New Hank Wood on December 11, 2008, 04:05:01 AM
Mike totally destroyed his body by lifting 'nut job' heavy!

So what does any broken down drug addict loser do?  They become a trainer.

Yes, Mike took his whiny voice off to gym to train people.

This crazy assed mother fucker became responsible for screwing up many bodies.  He instructed his clientele of naive retards to 'lift heavy'. And they did, and they got nowhere (just injured) with his stolen-bullshit-training-concepts.

Death couldn't come to soon for this neurotic plagiarist, Arnold-hater and would-be-Philosopher!
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: Bluto on December 11, 2008, 04:29:14 AM
Great thread and some great pictures there, thanks!

 :)
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: SaltShaker on December 11, 2008, 04:39:23 AM
The most badass 'stache in bodybuilding

his shaving habbit was the same as his bodybuilding, probably once a month
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: Bluto on December 11, 2008, 04:42:07 AM
his shaving habbit was the same as his bodybuilding, probably once a month

Not a bad routine, leaves a lot of time for other things like the ladies

 :)
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: Canadian_Muscle on December 11, 2008, 05:50:50 AM
Good stuff there Hank.
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: Ruffneck on December 11, 2008, 06:05:01 AM
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2197/2456916351_a86c1792b5.jpg?v=0)

Rustys stache is just as epic
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: Bluto on December 11, 2008, 06:06:00 AM
Wow !!!  :o
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: Canadian_Muscle on December 11, 2008, 06:07:21 AM
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2197/2456916351_a86c1792b5.jpg?v=0)

Rustys stache is just as epic

True. Some people would say both of these guys are uncrowned champions.
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: Ruffneck on December 11, 2008, 06:51:49 AM
Nobody rocks the stache like Don Frye though - his outlook on life is epic too!!!





Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: Griffith on December 11, 2008, 07:20:18 AM
....
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: Bluto on December 11, 2008, 07:42:13 AM
I approve of the new direction this thread is going!!

 :)
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: The Showstoppa on December 11, 2008, 07:45:13 AM
(http://ca.geocities.com/cannonballrunpitstop/cannonballimages/reynoldscar.jpg)
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: Canadian_Muscle on December 11, 2008, 10:03:21 AM
littering and... littering and... littering and smokin the reefer
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: luvvsuNOT on December 11, 2008, 08:14:47 PM
Hank, I've become a huge fan of yours and have been reading through your threads. Your insights are breathtaking and borders on pure genuis and I'm still going through your Heiko thread which will live through history as an enduring classic. But, my friend, you are wrong, horribly wrong, about Mentzer's mustache. This mustache, which you so unjustly refer to as "grotesque", is the standard by which all mustaches should be judged and measure.

I demand that you retract this statement and accusation.

(http://digilander.libero.it/mikementzer/m38.jpg)
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: PJim on December 11, 2008, 08:26:40 PM
Great forearms, triceps and calves on Mentzer.
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: luvvsuNOT on December 11, 2008, 08:28:20 PM
Great forearms, triceps and calves on Mentzer.

Um, aren't you forgetting one other thing?
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: NaturalWonder83 on December 11, 2008, 08:44:27 PM
mike looks great!
i wish i could look like that one day!

who knows what his diet was?
anyone?
any old timers know???
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: Voice of Doom on December 11, 2008, 08:47:44 PM
His stache was robbed in '80! >:(
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: nycbull on December 11, 2008, 10:20:40 PM
Mike loved to indulge.  He enjoyed all varieties of illicit substances.  And yes, he had issues with alcohol and cigarettes as well.

Mike died a tormented and twisted soul.  His legacy is quite unimpressive; a whiny voice, a grotesque moustache, track marks, a vile breath and a huge library of purile philosophy literature.

It is true that Mike despised Arnold.  Many belief that his deep and bitter hatred of the great man is in part, responsible for his early and predictable death.

how dare you, how fucking dare you!
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: Eric2 on December 11, 2008, 10:29:24 PM
Mike never got over getting his ass handed to him by Arnold the great, he went nuts, drank his own piss. Rambled on and on about bullshit philosophy got fat and died.
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: Ruffneck on December 12, 2008, 02:25:35 AM
Mentzer had a great physique and his stache was of ridiculously epic proportions but all that Ann Rand shit, well he could have shoved that bollocks up his anus.

Surely Mike = Meltdown
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: WillGrant on December 12, 2008, 02:38:21 AM
Ann Rand shit, well he could have shoved that bollocks up his anus.


He proberly tryed  :-\
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on December 12, 2008, 03:02:49 AM
Surely Mike = Meltdown

Haha, that is right, Mike is the epitome of total meltdown.
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: Canadian_Muscle on December 12, 2008, 06:04:28 AM
Haha, that is right, Mike is the epitome of total meltdown.

He never recovered  :'(
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: luvvsuNOT on December 12, 2008, 12:57:52 PM
He never recovered  :'(

It really is too bad and tragic that Mentzer took his 1980 loss so hard. There's politics involved in everything and people get screwed. Look how long Bob Chic had to languish as an amateur and does anyone really believe that Putnum deserved his pro card? And look at Jay in 2001. The list goes on and on and Mike got it no worse than anybody else. Life isn't fair and it's perseverance that often makes the difference. I never would have thought Mike, one of the sources of inspiration as a teen, to have such a weak character.

Obviously Mike, nor anyone else, would have beaten the smoothed quad, bow legged, gyno ridden Franco in 1981 (which was the biggest travesty ever in Olympia history) as that again was a lock orchestrated by Arnold and even Franco's own considerable clout. But if Mike just equaled his 1980 form I think he would have taken the 1982 crown quite handily. Dickerson could not match Mike's total package. Mike would have been in his early thirties, he would have captured the O on his fourth try and history would have been different. Perhaps we would have been spared the horrific image of Mike directing traffic on the 405 nude and cowering under a desk in a bank.

Either way, the glorious mustache would have always lived on.

(http://digilander.libero.it/mikementzer/m14.jpg)
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: Bluto on December 12, 2008, 01:04:07 PM
Great post.

I think we Michael Mentzer-appreciators of Getbig are a brotherhood.
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: Danimal77 on December 12, 2008, 01:15:31 PM
The most badass 'stache in bodybuilding

225 pounds of pure ripped and proportioned muscle. One of the greatest.
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: New Hank Wood on December 12, 2008, 02:13:21 PM
The only legacy Mike left was his whiny voice....Yes, the Jays and the Lees certainly picked up on this unfortunate characteristic!

Bottom line, Mike is just another dead bodybuilder. 

He tortured his mind and body through the use of steroids, alcohol and cocaine. And what did he become as a result of this abuse?  A rambling, incoherent lunatic.

Yes, it was kind of sad to see how quickly Mike receded; after he stopped injecting the roids. 

In actual fact, within a few short months his arms looked like spaghetti and his chest became sunken.

The lesson here is; live clean, train clean and be your own person. 

Drugs are for the weak minded and the insecure.....  Mike certainly proved this to be the case!
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: tommywishbone on December 12, 2008, 02:30:54 PM
Not that much mass , but a boatload of symmertry, and plenty of density.

(http://gamesnet.vo.llnwd.net/o1/gamestar/objects/154296_main.jpg)
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: luvvsuNOT on December 12, 2008, 03:35:03 PM
The only legacy Mike left was his whiny voice....Yes, the Jays and the Lees certainly picked up on this unfortunate characteristic!

Bottom line, Mike is just another dead bodybuilder. 

He tortured his mind and body through the use of steroids, alcohol and cocaine. And what did he become as a result of this abuse?  A rambling, incoherent lunatic.

Yes, it was kind of sad to see how quickly Mike receded; after he stopped injecting the roids. 

In actual fact, within a few short months his arms looked like spaghetti and his chest became sunken.

The lesson here is; live clean, train clean and be your own person. 

Drugs are for the weak minded and the insecure.....  Mike certainly proved this to be the case!

You are so off on this. Sure he had major flaws, the whiny, nasal a particular galling one. But the man left a legacy. This is easily evident when a debate ensues regarding his training methodology. The theads, both pro and con, grow passionate and heated, and inevitably are locked.

His impact was tremendous and he's hardly given credit for it (though admittedly most of his ideas came from Jones). Remember the Arnold days when they were training each body part 2-3 times a week? When they didn't distinguish between intensity and duration? When the pump was the be all and end all? Who even talked about genetics during that time? Why Arnold was Arnold and though people copied him nobody was close to him during that time? Who talked about the difference between localized recovery and systemic recovery? In fact, who talked about the importance of recovery at all or even the idea of over training. What about the weak links like biceps when training lats and triceps when training chest and how the principle of pre-exhaustion can circumvent that?
He even was the first to dismiss the idea of "reforming" or "shaping" your muscles by certain exercises like trying to do concentration curls for a "peak" or Scott curls for your "lower" biceps. That muscle shape was genetically predetermined and no matter how many incline presses you do you're never going to get Franco's armour plated upper chest.

You are very, very wrong about Mike Mentzer not having a legacy. His impact was great and will continue to be.

Please retract your statement about his mustache being "grotesque." This is now my second request. Don't make me dismiss you ala gh15.
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: Man of Steel on December 12, 2008, 03:36:13 PM
You are so off on this. Sure he had major flaws, the whiny, nasal a particular galling one. But the man left a legacy. This is easily evident when a debate ensues regarding his training methodology. The theads, both pro and con, grow passionate and heated, and inevitably are locked.

His impact was tremendous and he's hardly given credit for it (though admittedly most of his ideas came from Jones). Remember the Arnold days when they were training each body part 2-3 times a week? When they didn't distinguish between intensity and duration? When the pump was the be all and end all? Who even talked about genetics during that time? Why Arnold was Arnold and though people copied him nobody was close to him during that time? Who talked about the difference between localized recovery and systemic recovery? In fact, who talked about the importance of recovery at all or even the idea of over training. What about the weak links like biceps when training lats and triceps when training chest and how the principle of pre-exhaustion can circumvent that?
He even was the first to dismiss the idea of "reforming" or "shaping" your muscles by certain exercises like trying to do concentration curls for a "peak" or Scott curls for your "lower" biceps. That muscle shape was genetically predetermined and no matter how many incline presses you do you're never going to get Franco's armour plated upper chest.

You are very, very wrong about Mike Mentzer not having a legacy. His impact was great and will continue to be.

Please retract your statement about his mustache being "grotesque." This is now my second request. Don't make you dismiss you ala gh15.

There are things jockrider?
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: Bluto on December 12, 2008, 03:37:59 PM
You are so off on this. Sure he had major flaws, the whiny, nasal a particular galling one. But the man left a legacy. This is easily evident when a debate ensues regarding his training methodology. The theads, both pro and con, grow passionate and heated, and inevitably are locked.

His impact was tremendous and he's hardly given credit for it (though admittedly most of his ideas came from Jones). Remember the Arnold days when they were training each body part 2-3 times a week? When they didn't distinguish between intensity and duration? When the pump was the be all and end all? Who even talked about genetics during that time? Why Arnold was Arnold and though people copied him nobody was close to him during that time? Who talked about the difference between localized recovery and systemic recovery? In fact, who talked about the importance of recovery at all or even the idea of over training. What about the weak links like biceps when training lats and triceps when training chest and how the principle of pre-exhaustion can circumvent that?
He even was the first to dismiss the idea of "reforming" or "shaping" your muscles by certain exercises like trying to do concentration curls for a "peak" or Scott curls for your "lower" biceps. That muscle shape was genetically predetermined and no matter how many incline presses you do you're never going to get Franco's armour plated upper chest.

You are very, very wrong about Mike Mentzer not having a legacy. His impact was great and will continue to be.

Please retract your statement about his mustache being "grotesque." This is now my second request. Don't make you dismiss you ala gh15.

Agreed
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: Ruffneck on December 12, 2008, 04:56:50 PM
The only legacy Mike left was his whiny voice....Yes, the Jays and the Lees certainly picked up on this unfortunate characteristic!

Bottom line, Mike is just another dead bodybuilder. 

He tortured his mind and body through the use of steroids, alcohol and cocaine. And what did he become as a result of this abuse?  A rambling, incoherent lunatic.

Yes, it was kind of sad to see how quickly Mike receded; after he stopped injecting the roids. 

In actual fact, within a few short months his arms looked like spaghetti and his chest became sunken.

The lesson here is; live clean, train clean and be your own person. 

Drugs are for the weak minded and the insecure.....  Mike certainly proved this to be the case!

I thought his drug of choice was speed?
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: sean on December 12, 2008, 05:44:11 PM
this thread is entirely HOMOSEXUAL
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: tbombz on December 12, 2008, 05:53:45 PM
just imagine what he woulda looked liek without the coke, meth, low volume trianing, and low calorie low protein diet... dude woulda been EVEN MORE amazing..
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: New Hank Wood on December 12, 2008, 06:03:44 PM
Mike is just another fraud...a stealer of ideas and concepts.

He made wild claims, yet was never able to back them up with science.

Take away the drugs and Mike was nothing.  It was the steroids that provided a false reality for Mike.

This is evidenced by his ridiculous lifting-regime.  Basically, all he achieved from this was a destroyed vertebrae and major joint problems.

Similar to every other delusional roider, when the needles stop, the body deflates!  And this was clearly the case with this irrational-man-of the-junk!

At the end of day, happiness can be measured in health and longevity.  Mike failed in both of these areas...no surprises there!

Yes, Mike died and unhealthy man.  

He slipped into the abyss with no 'real friends'.  People just tolerated this raving lunatic....now, that is a true tragedy!
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: WillGrant on December 12, 2008, 06:08:45 PM
just imagine what he woulda looked liek without the coke, meth, low volume trianing, and low calorie low protein diet... dude woulda been EVEN MORE amazing..
Newsflashh..mike never actualy followed the shit he talked about..

He was seen once doing a chest work out by a quite well known journo from MM.

He was seen to do 4 exercises for his chest.

Example.
Bench press.set 1 10 -12 reps
                 set 2 8-10 reps
                 set 3 6-8 reps
                 set 4 4-6 reps with 2 forced and a negative rep.


He did this on all 4 exercises..

After his work out the journo approached him  and asked if he had given up on HD training and had gone back to traditional bodybuilding pyramid training..
Mike said:Rubbish , that was HD at its best , its only the last set that counted as the proceeding sets were warm ups and he was adament he had only done 4 sets total..

Even though he worked hard on all lead up sets.
The journo was astonished as he had just seen mentzer do 16 work sets but mentzer claimed to have only done 4.  ???
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: tbombz on December 12, 2008, 06:13:17 PM
Newsflashh..mike never actualy followed the shit he talked about..

He was seen once doing a chest work out by a quite well known journo from MM.

He was seen to do 4 exercises for his chest.

Example.
Bench press.set 1 10 -12 reps
                 set 2 8-10 reps
                 set 3 6-8 reps
                 set 4 4-6 reps with 2 forced and a negative rep.


He did this on all 4 exercises..

After his work out the journo approached him  and asked if he had given up on HD training and had gone back to traditional bodybuilding pyramid training..
Mike said:Rubbish , that was HD at its best , its only the last set that counted as the proceeding sets were warm ups and he was adament he had only done 4 sets total..

Even though he worked hard on all lead up sets.
The journo was astonished as he had just seen mentzer do 16 work sets but mentzer claimed to have only done 4.  ???
maybe they only THOUGHT he was workin hard on his warm ups..   i dont know.. i traned with a guy who was taught hd by mentzer and he swears by hd  and thats the way he trained exactly and he always said that the warmup sets were a joke and they were just there to get a feel for the weight and let the muscles know what was going on..
Title: Re: Mike Menzter
Post by: dyslexic on December 12, 2008, 06:16:24 PM
He instructed his clientele of naive retards to 'lift heavy'. And they did, and they got nowhere (just injured) with his stolen-bullshit-training-concepts.

So, your'e saying there is also someone else to blame?
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: New Hank Wood on December 12, 2008, 06:18:06 PM
Mike was a fruit cake.  His word meant nothing.

It was a great day, post the 80 Olympia, when Mike decided to turn his back on competition.

The sport did not miss him, in actual fact it was like a breath of fresh air.  

He was just so negative and opinionated.  Thank Christ this nutcase decided to bow out, albeit, ungracefully!

And of course, in true preacher fashion, this disciple of H.I.T 'never' practised what he preached.

He tried to play mind games with industry and failed. He just wasn't smart enough.  Kind of now explains his intense and bitter hatred for Arnold....Hmmmmmm.  

Yes, Mike was a totally screwed up son of bitch!

Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: Canadian_Muscle on December 12, 2008, 06:32:45 PM
You are so off on this. Sure he had major flaws, the whiny, nasal a particular galling one. But the man left a legacy. This is easily evident when a debate ensues regarding his training methodology. The theads, both pro and con, grow passionate and heated, and inevitably are locked.

His impact was tremendous and he's hardly given credit for it (though admittedly most of his ideas came from Jones). Remember the Arnold days when they were training each body part 2-3 times a week? When they didn't distinguish between intensity and duration? When the pump was the be all and end all? Who even talked about genetics during that time? Why Arnold was Arnold and though people copied him nobody was close to him during that time? Who talked about the difference between localized recovery and systemic recovery? In fact, who talked about the importance of recovery at all or even the idea of over training. What about the weak links like biceps when training lats and triceps when training chest and how the principle of pre-exhaustion can circumvent that?
He even was the first to dismiss the idea of "reforming" or "shaping" your muscles by certain exercises like trying to do concentration curls for a "peak" or Scott curls for your "lower" biceps. That muscle shape was genetically predetermined and no matter how many incline presses you do you're never going to get Franco's armour plated upper chest.

You are very, very wrong about Mike Mentzer not having a legacy. His impact was great and will continue to be.

Please retract your statement about his mustache being "grotesque." This is now my second request. Don't make me dismiss you ala gh15.

Great post.
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: luvvsuNOT on December 12, 2008, 06:33:27 PM
Mike is just another fraud...a stealer of ideas and concepts.

He made wild claims, yet was never able to back them up with science.

Take away the drugs and Mike was nothing.  It was the steroids that provided a false reality for Mike.

This is evidenced by his ridiculous lifting-regime.  Basically, all he achieved from this was a destroyed vertebrae and major joint problems.

Similar to every other delusional roider, when the needles stop, the body deflates!  And this was clearly the case with this irrational-man-of the-junk!

At the end of day, happiness can be measured in health and longevity.  Mike failed in both of these areas...no surprises there!

Yes, Mike died and unhealthy man.  

He slipped into the abyss with no 'real friends'.  People just tolerated this raving lunatic....now, that is a true tragedy!

I think you are the raving lunatic my bitter friend. It has been proven scientifically the importance of intensity vs duration for the purpose of increasing strength and hypertrophy.

Mike was above average and developed before drugs. At fifteen he probably put you to shame at your best.

Every athlete in any type of contact sport or sport requiring extreme physical exertion will suffer from injuries. Did Mike train heavier than Coleman? Has any top bb gone through his career injury free?

Everybody will deflate into a weak mass of flesh whether you do drugs or not. Who dies healthy? From dust to dust my bitter, angry, self-appointed commentator.

And where did you get the idea that happiness stems from health and how long you live? Stephan Hawkings has lived a very productive and, most importantly, meaningful life, yet he has spent most of his life in poor health. The brave and courageous soldier, Pat Tillman, gave up a comfortable and prosperous life style to fight and die for his country at a relatively early age. By all accounts he was a very happy man.

And how do you know Mike had no real friends? How can you possibly know that? To this day, no matter what you or anybody else thinks about him, he has a legion of devoted fans. The woman who runs his site was very close to him. Have you read any of letters written from people all over the world that testifies to the positive impact Mike had on their lives? Can you say the same?

You are known mostly as a bitter, disillusion, commentator who seems to have gotten his heart broken because of the travesty that modern bb has become. So you sit there and put yourself on a pedestal and just criticize everybody and everything associated with this endeavor.

When you die no one but your immediate family will remember you and hopefully care. But that will quickly pass in the next generation. Mike Mentzer will be long remembered and his principles, along with it's variations, will be discussed and debated while you pass quickly into oblivion leaving no legacy behind.

You, poor man, are the true tragedy.

DISMISSED!
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: WillGrant on December 12, 2008, 06:39:42 PM
maybe they only THOUGHT he was workin hard on his warm ups..   i dont know.. i traned with a guy who was taught hd by mentzer and he swears by hd  and thats the way he trained exactly and he always said that the warmup sets were a joke and they were just there to get a feel for the weight and let the muscles know what was going on..
It sure looks like traditional BB training though..he pyramid every exercise like that..

I follow a more Yates and Labrada form of training..

Say I was doing bench and my hardest set was 150kg 6-8 reps.
I would do it in a feel set way like your friend..

Example.
Bar x20 reps
60kg x10 reps
100kg x 3-4 reps
120kg x2 reps

1st set 150kg x 6-8 reps maybe a forced rep
2nd set 140kg x 6-8 reps..

Now to me that out mentzers mentzer.
there are really only 2 genuine work sets there.

the bar and 60kg set are to get blood  into the area the next two are feel sets where in reality I could knock off 12- 20 reps on those sets.

Mentzer trained like arnold but only counted his last set.he was witnessed to be training hard on those first sets and to follow the same set/rep pattern for three more exercises.that is redundent when the area is already warmed from that first exercise..all that is needed is some feel sets for 3 or 4 reps then jump to your heaviest , but no , mike followed the way arnold trained he just did not like to say he did. ;)
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: Ruffneck on December 12, 2008, 06:40:21 PM
to be fair hawking never had half the meltdown that Mike had.If he had that wheelchair and that monotone voice would be well out of sync and talking like Ann Rand had programmed it.
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: New Hank Wood on December 12, 2008, 06:53:02 PM
Mike possessed little strength of character.  He used drugs as a crutch.

Drugs addicts are weak minded, undisciplined losers. Hence, they 'use' to blot-out or veil  their reality! Mike was a master at cover-up and distorting truth!

He would belittle people and dismiss all training doctrines that contradicted his methodologies (the one's he plagiarised).

At the end of the day, Mike felt threatened and insecure about the principles he was trying to promote.  And again, not his own concepts; ones stolen from Arthur.

Mike was always looking for ways to justify his pathetic lifestyle. His obsession with Ayn Rand is a testimony to that.

Just another lost and tormented soul looking for justification in a life that had become consumed by amphetamines, alcohol and chain smoking.

Oh yes, Mike was sooooo happy!

And again, genetics are genetics. When Mike stopped with the roids everything turned to shit.  Again, demonstrating that drugs are  'the equation' and not training style!

In summary, happy and contented people don't try and rubbish an industry.  They don't become raving drug addicts.  And they don't shit in their bed.  Mike is all of this and more.
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: Viking11 on December 13, 2008, 12:04:30 AM
A great bodybuilder. Innovative trainer and HIT theorist. A good friend. Funny guy. RIP Mike.
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: New Hank Wood on December 13, 2008, 12:22:01 AM
An irresponsible drug addict, that's all Mike amounted to! 

Mike can take the credit for pushing a theory (HIT) that is singularly responsible for destroying more physiques than any other. 

There are  hundreds of half baked training theories out there, but 'Mike's stolen ideas' stand above all else, as being the ultimate in bullshit-ideology!

That's right, Mike encouraged anyone who would listen, to go heavy, heavy, heavy.  All that resulted were a lot of severely injured noobies.

And yes, Mike never practised what he preached. 

He can join the queue of dead charletans!

Thanks Mike, for adding your brand of nothingness to a sport that is now regarded as one of the most obscene and reviled passtimes on the planet.

And i agree, with that whingey and whiny voice of his, there must be 'a part gay chromosome' lurking within!
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: pellius on December 13, 2008, 01:06:44 AM
I'm a big fan of Hank and love the way he exposes modern bodybuilding for what it has become. But this Mentzer diatribe is a bit odd. Sure Mentzer had his demons and for a period of time was a drug addict but he did rehabilitate himself and ran a very successful training business. He was in demand and had clients all over the world.
He always gave Jones full credit and even talked about how he began his journey when he first met Casey Viator at the America and how through Casey he met Jones. Jones, who was a very hard, no nonsense, vindictive, ornery SOB didn't suffer fools and was quick to criticize those who tried to copy him or in any way exploit his genius. As far as I know, he never criticized Mentzer or accused him of plagiarism and seemed to always be on good terms with him. At least, insofar that one could be on good terms with Jones.

To say Mentzer has no legacy and contributed nothing is really strange. I mean, Hank started a thread devoted just to him, and any thread that contains Mike and his training methods always seems to go on forever nearly thirty years after his retirement. The ones who seem to get the most attention from that fateful 1980 Mr. Olympia is of course Arnold, but after that it is easily Mentzer.

Mentzer's impact on bodybuilding and training was huge and obviously enduring. You're off on this one, Hank. I don't get it. Maybe you're just running out of people to trash and you're reaching back into an era when bodybuilding was still halfway decent.
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: pellius on December 13, 2008, 01:13:17 AM
You are so off on this. Sure he had major flaws, the whiny, nasal a particular galling one. But the man left a legacy. This is easily evident when a debate ensues regarding his training methodology. The theads, both pro and con, grow passionate and heated, and inevitably are locked.

His impact was tremendous and he's hardly given credit for it (though admittedly most of his ideas came from Jones). Remember the Arnold days when they were training each body part 2-3 times a week? When they didn't distinguish between intensity and duration? When the pump was the be all and end all? Who even talked about genetics during that time? Why Arnold was Arnold and though people copied him nobody was close to him during that time? Who talked about the difference between localized recovery and systemic recovery? In fact, who talked about the importance of recovery at all or even the idea of over training. What about the weak links like biceps when training lats and triceps when training chest and how the principle of pre-exhaustion can circumvent that?
He even was the first to dismiss the idea of "reforming" or "shaping" your muscles by certain exercises like trying to do concentration curls for a "peak" or Scott curls for your "lower" biceps. That muscle shape was genetically predetermined and no matter how many incline presses you do you're never going to get Franco's armour plated upper chest.

You are very, very wrong about Mike Mentzer not having a legacy. His impact was great and will continue to be.

Please retract your statement about his mustache being "grotesque." This is now my second request. Don't make me dismiss you ala gh15.

I like this post. Mentzer gave a new perspective on training protocol, or at least brought it to the forefront. For Hank to say he destroyed more physiques than anybody is just very strange and odd. Have you forgotten some of your other targets, Hank, like Milos and Palumbo? Has Mike created such atrocities as Kovacs, Kamali, Hide, Luke Wood and even Cutler? -- All who use to look great.
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: Soundness on December 13, 2008, 01:46:45 AM
I think you are the raving lunatic my bitter friend. It has been proven scientifically the importance of intensity vs duration for the purpose of increasing strength and hypertrophy.

Mike was above average and developed before drugs. At fifteen he probably put you to shame at your best.

Every athlete in any type of contact sport or sport requiring extreme physical exertion will suffer from injuries. Did Mike train heavier than Coleman? Has any top bb gone through his career injury free?

Everybody will deflate into a weak mass of flesh whether you do drugs or not. Who dies healthy? From dust to dust my bitter, angry, self-appointed commentator.

And where did you get the idea that happiness stems from health and how long you live? Stephan Hawkings has lived a very productive and, most importantly, meaningful life, yet he has spent most of his life in poor health. The brave and courageous soldier, Pat Tillman, gave up a comfortable and prosperous life style to fight and die for his country at a relatively early age. By all accounts he was a very happy man.

And how do you know Mike had no real friends? How can you possibly know that? To this day, no matter what you or anybody else thinks about him, he has a legion of devoted fans. The woman who runs his site was very close to him. Have you read any of letters written from people all over the world that testifies to the positive impact Mike had on their lives? Can you say the same?

You are known mostly as a bitter, disillusion, commentator who seems to have gotten his heart broken because of the travesty that modern bb has become. So you sit there and put yourself on a pedestal and just criticize everybody and everything associated with this endeavor.

When you die no one but your immediate family will remember you and hopefully care. But that will quickly pass in the next generation. Mike Mentzer will be long remembered and his principles, along with it's variations, will be discussed and debated while you pass quickly into oblivion leaving no legacy behind.

You, poor man, are the true tragedy.

DISMISSED!

luvvsuNOT = respect
Title: Re: Mike Mentzer
Post by: Rmj11 on March 27, 2022, 12:01:33 PM
Newsflashh..mike never actualy followed the shit he talked about..

He was seen once doing a chest work out by a quite well known journo from MM.

He was seen to do 4 exercises for his chest.

Example.
Bench press.set 1 10 -12 reps
                 set 2 8-10 reps
                 set 3 6-8 reps
                 set 4 4-6 reps with 2 forced and a negative rep.


He did this on all 4 exercises..

After his work out the journo approached him  and asked if he had given up on HD training and had gone back to traditional bodybuilding pyramid training..
Mike said:Rubbish , that was HD at its best , its only the last set that counted as the proceeding sets were warm ups and he was adament he had only done 4 sets total..

Even though he worked hard on all lead up sets.
The journo was astonished as he had just seen mentzer do 16 work sets but mentzer claimed to have only done 4.  ???


Yep. Conventional pyramid training. Just like Arnold used. Mentzer was full of it.