Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Bodybuilding Boards => Steroids Info & Hardcore => Topic started by: 4thAD on December 31, 2008, 11:14:28 AM
-
Since we as mods can not ban members on this board, I am thinking about making a sticky for members who's advice is not to be trusted. This will in no way be a list that we will add names to just because somebody does not like somebody else. This will be a serious list to help protect the good members and new members of the board. This is the hardcore section and I think good solid info is paramount. Ive had enough of members telling newbs its great to run 1000mg test first cycle, and telling newbs to not come off. I'm also tired of twinks coming over here and telling people its a great idea to run oral only cycles, with no thought to how an oral only could affect someone with no test production. I'm truly tired of the bs on this board as of late.
I'm thinking the sticky will only be allowed to be accessed by the mods and we as a team along with suggestions from vets of the board will make the decision of who's name to post on the list. The shit that goes on, on this board really pisses me off, and would not be tolerated anywhere else.
I would like good solid opinions here. No trash talk and no bs, just good solid opinions.
-
The shit that goes on, on this board really pisses me off, and would not be tolerated anywhere else.
I would like good solid opinions here. No trash talk and no bs, just good solid opinions.
Agreed.
This used to be the top shelf board to come to for good advice and no fear of being lit on fire for what some consider "dumb" questions. I still love it here, only because I spend more time reading than typing. If you hang around long enough, and do some homework on the opinions posted, you can see who the tards are. Just seems like there's more lately.
If your a newb to AAS (like myself), then Google is your best friend. Double check and read the studies, don't be afraid to PM the 4 mods here if your concerned with being flamed for asking a question, in my experience their good guys.
Lewellens new book is a good read as well.
I say go forth with the list MHO...
-
A good clean-up would be nice
-
nothing like starting 2009 with the right foot, lets start the list with the biggest idiot:
TBOMBZ
-
nothing like starting 2009 with the right foot, lets start the list with the biggest idiot:
TBOMBZ
lol
-
the problem here is everyone has there own opinion on things fine dont run a 1000mg a week as a beginner did you listen when you started I DOUBT IT. I know I didnt and as far as running a all oral cycle who are you or anyone else to say its a bad Idea unless you have done it yourself.I have done alot of cycles and never had a issue but does that mean someone else wont?
These are opinions so who is to say someone know more then the next person,once you say one thing theres someone else out there that thinks differently.
-
i like your plan. iam new to gear and what ive read in books and what some others say dont jive and i dont want to hear bs from some jackass that has no genetic potential are the drive to push his physique to a higher quality...
-
the problem here is everyone has there own opinion on things fine dont run a 1000mg a week as a beginner did you listen when you started I DOUBT IT. I know I didnt and as far as running a all oral cycle who are you or anyone else to say its a bad Idea unless you have done it yourself.I have done alot of cycles and never had a issue but does that mean someone else wont?
These are opinions so who is to say someone know more then the next person,once you say one thing theres someone else out there that thinks differently.
There are standards and safety protocols rawdawg. If you want to run oral only cycles then that's your decision and I am no one to tell you different. If you want to stuff your self with 1000mg of test ew on your first cycle, by all means, but it does not mean other newb members should advertise these practices to others trying to learn the correct way to cycle. There are responsible safe ways to do things and there are careless ways. This board needs to promote the safe smart way of doing things. Of course each individual will have their own differing protocols, but the basics are the basics, stick to them!
-
This is a tough one IMO, since there are many different ways to go about things. But I do like your sentiment 4thAD about keeping things safe, cause you are right there is a safe, conserative approach to AAS use that should be supported here. This safe way of doing things is for sure the best for a new guy or gal for that matter.
Also agree there has been too much bashing and stuff going on too.
Now a board list of names that are bad, Im not sure about :-\
Would a list of good advice names be better? Maybe more positive? But even that is subjective.
-
This is a tough one IMO, since there are many different ways to go about things. But I do like your sentiment 4thAD about keeping things safe, cause you are right there is a safe, conserative approach to AAS use that should be supported here. This safe way of doing things is for sure the best for a new guy or gal for that matter.
Also agree there has been too much bashing and stuff going on too.
Now a board list of names that are bad, Im not sure about :-\
Would a list of good advice names be better? Maybe more positive? But even that is subjective.
You might have something here Luv! That would even be better. Damn I'm glad I thought of that! JK ;D
In all seriousness I think this might be a good idea, lets hear some more members opinions. I'm just sick and tired of all the BS from some members on this board. Members making accusations about certain mods on the G&O and such, is utter BS.
-
I think it's a great idea to ensure accurate information, but not necessarily with a list of names. In fact, that's the exact reason why I made a thread this morning inquiring whether "informational stickies" would help provide basic accurate info for newbies to refer to. Some way, some how, we need to make sure people get accurate information.
-
I think it's a great idea to ensure accurate information, but not necessarily with a list of names. In fact, that's the exact reason why I made a thread this morning inquiring whether "informational stickies" would help provide basic accurate info for newbies to refer to. Some way, some how, we need to make sure people get accurate information.
thats true.
why not let somebody who has accurate information make them.
i think we all can agree on somebody.
i nominate van bilderasss
my second nomination is emmortal
my third nomination is abc123
my fourth nomination is a special guest 'disgusted' (who i think would probably be more than happy to write up some stufff for getbig)
-
we already have them, their called moderaters
-
jt for mod.
-
we already have them, their called moderaters
I don't normally agree with you but this is spot on.
A blacklist would be a little controversial but I wouldn't be opposed. If someone here is a pariah and decides to stick around despite being bashed by many members, I wouldn't trust their advice to begin with. Newbs won't be able to identify these individuals so perhaps it would be a good idea.
To be honest, if everyone called me out every time I posted I'd just fuck off or continue to lurk... but to each his own. It's my personal decision to err on the side of caution for the best interest of myself and others. I don't think it's beneficial to anyone to hand out liberal and potentially dangerous advise without throwing out some sort of disclaimer.
I'm not an argumentative person but if I give out advice that goes against the grain or is liberal with regards to dosages, side effects and health advice I always buffer my statements with a few words of warning. Better to be safe than sorry. Much better.
-
jt for mod.
agreed :)
I don't normally agree with you but this is spot on.
A blacklist would be a little controversial but I wouldn't be opposed. If someone here is a pariah and decides to stick around despite being bashed by many members, I wouldn't trust their advice to begin with. Newbs won't be able to identify these individuals so perhaps it would be a good idea.
To be honest, if everyone called me out every time I posted I'd just fuck off or continue to lurk... but to each his own. It's my personal decision to err on the side of caution for the best interest of myself and others. I don't think it's beneficial to anyone to hand out liberal and potentially dangerous advise without throwing out some sort of disclaimer.
I'm not an argumentative person but if I give out advice that goes against the grain or is liberal with regards to dosages, side effects and health advice I always buffer my statements with a few words of warning. Better to be safe than sorry. Much better.
thanks
jt
-
what about removeing the bullshit comments. i understand that if someone post a suggestion on dose or compounds that they shoild specify if it is safe or a uncharted route for the extreme
-
shrek im starting to like you, good posts. The mods do try to delete most of the bs comments, but you can't keep deleting posts because it becomes ridiculous.
jt
-
what about removeing the bullshit comments. i understand that if someone post a suggestion on dose or compounds that they shoild specify if it is safe or a uncharted route for the extreme
This causes members to absolutely flip shit and post three times as many ludicrous posts.
I've had my post deleted before (it wasn't about bad advice though) and although I'm a calm guy, I was so pissed I was ready to punch a pregnant chick in the stomach lol
-
i know but shit man im chaseing a dream that is hush hush this is the only place i can find to learn from others mistakes. i have i great life and alot of hunger all i ask is how to do things right and what are the limits to stop at... ive read some members shit and some of the stuff they say are sarcastic and plain ass retarded
-
Now a board list of names that are bad, Im not sure about :-\
Would a list of good advice names be better? Maybe more positive? But even that is subjective.
I agree. I think if this goes through, a more "positive list" would be better. Even though it's subjective, at least the members on that "list" can carry on an intelligent "discussion" without getting personal.
-
i know but shit man im chaseing a dream that is hush hush this is the only place i can find to learn from others mistakes. i have i great life and alot of hunger all i ask is how to do things right and what are the limits to stop at... ive read some members shit and some of the stuff they say are sarcastic and plain ass retarded
if your "chasing the dream" as in = you want to look like those pros in the magazine, then you will not be healthy or cautious or moderate.
-
This causes members to absolutely flip shit and post three times as many ludicrous posts.
I've had my post deleted before (it wasn't about bad advice though) and although I'm a calm guy, I was so pissed I was ready to punch a pregnant chick in the stomach lol
If a member here posts something out of line, dangerous, or is posting up sourcing info it gets deleted. I dont really care how pissed they get.
I am not directing this message at you personally dustin so don't go punching any pregnant chicks. ;D
-
of course but im not going to jump right into the deep end. i need to do trails on my body cause no one is the same but hell if you think like that then you are probly the one telling people to take gh slin abombs and 1500 mg of test susp with 1000mgs deca
-
of course but im not going to jump right into the deep end. i need to do trails on my body cause no one is the same but hell if you think like that then you are probly the one telling people to take gh slin abombs and 1500 mg of test susp with 1000mgs deca
1,500 mg of test isn't a enormous amount especially if you want to be a amateur in NPC, but it is tons if your shooting it as suspension cause that is very frequent injects and would be painful i would think.
jt
-
i know i was just sateing that amount as to that should not be used until you have more than one notch in your belt
-
i know i was just sateing that amount as to that should not be used until you have more than one notch in your belt
yeah of course not, see how well you react to smaller doses and adjust accordingly.
jt
-
Another thing is I hope people who come to this forum are smart enough to know its the Internet! Not to take what you read on message boards as gospel or fact.
Thats why anyone getting into this MUST do their own research and looking into things and never just take the advice of someone. With the internet now it easy to get lots of info fast so you can make an informed opinion.
Its your body you must make the decission yourself on what you are going to do.
-
lets just get off candidizzle aka tbombz aka manteca meltdown machine , i dont really want to start a gimmick and post pics of his mom with cocks all over her face and see him meltdown again ::) ::) ::)
-
Great idea 4thAD
-
Personally I'm against censorship, putting people in 'good bro' and 'bad bro' categories, etc. It stifles debate, creates a bunch of disgusting 'yes men'... if you're not in the 'good bro clique' people gang up on you for no good reason. The absolute worst info is found on boards with heavy censorship where you can't ever disagree with a 'vet'. The best info is found where anyone is liable to be called out on bad info.
-
If a member here posts something out of line, dangerous, or is posting up sourcing info it gets deleted. I dont really care how pissed they get.
I am not directing this message at you personally dustin so don't go punching any pregnant chicks. ;D
Oh shit! Too late!!! *backs away slowly* :o :D
-
Personally I'm against censorship, putting people in 'good bro' and 'bad bro' categories, etc. It stifles debate, creates a bunch of disgusting 'yes men'... if you're not in the 'good bro clique' people gang up on you for no good reason. The absolute worst info is found on boards with heavy censorship where you can't ever disagree with a 'vet'. The best info is found where anyone is liable to be called out on bad info.
Agree.
-
Personally I'm against censorship, putting people in 'good bro' and 'bad bro' categories, etc. It stifles debate, creates a bunch of disgusting 'yes men'... if you're not in the 'good bro clique' people gang up on you for no good reason. The absolute worst info is found on boards with heavy censorship where you can't ever disagree with a 'vet'. The best info is found where anyone is liable to be called out on bad info.
I second Luv's agreement.
-
Since we as mods can not ban members on this board, I am thinking about making a sticky for members who's advice is not to be trusted. This will in no way be a list that we will add names to just because somebody does not like somebody else. This will be a serious list to help protect the good members and new members of the board. This is the hardcore section and I think good solid info is paramount. Ive had enough of members telling newbs its great to run 1000mg test first cycle, and telling newbs to not come off. I'm also tired of twinks coming over here and telling people its a great idea to run oral only cycles, with no thought to how an oral only could affect someone with no test production. I'm truly tired of the bs on this board as of late.
I'm thinking the sticky will only be allowed to be accessed by the mods and we as a team along with suggestions from vets of the board will make the decision of who's name to post on the list. The shit that goes on, on this board really pisses me off, and would not be tolerated anywhere else.
I would like good solid opinions here. No trash talk and no bs, just good solid opinions.
please cite studies that say that oral only cycles don't work, thanks ahead of time.
-
please cite studies that say that oral only cycles don't work, thanks ahead of time.
we are not discussing that dave, its like asking you if living in a trailer is honorable.
Stick to the topic please
-
Excellent idea 4th..
Some of these clowns that use this board as a gossip forum need to be curtailed!!
Childlike attitude combinded with adolescent arrogance is a DANGEROUS FN MIX!!!!
These fools are the reason STEROIDS get a bad rap and are a primary reason for criminalizing them as such
Most of all these FOOLS are a MAJOR LIABILITY to the rest of our COMMUNITY..
Anything the mods like you,DIV,AJ,&RIM could do to fix this would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Phoenix71
-
Personally I'm against censorship, putting people in 'good bro' and 'bad bro' categories, etc. It stifles debate, creates a bunch of disgusting 'yes men'... if you're not in the 'good bro clique' people gang up on you for no good reason. The absolute worst info is found on boards with heavy censorship where you can't ever disagree with a 'vet'. The best info is found where anyone is liable to be called out on bad info.
Exactly. No need to create lists of good and bad, it would all be one persons opinion over another anyway. People here already have a formed opinion on different posters. But some of the juvenile back and forth needs to stop, take stuff like that to the G&O.
-
Excellent idea 4th..
Some of these clowns that use this board as a gossip forum need to be curtailed!!
Childlike attitude combinded with adolescent arrogance is a DANGEROUS FN MIX!!!!
These fools are the reason STEROIDS get a bad rap and are a primary reason for criminalizing them as such
Most of all these FOOLS are a MAJOR LIABILITY to the rest of our COMMUNITY..
Anything the mods like you,DIV,AJ,&RIM could do to fix this would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Phoenix71
I appreciate your enthusiasm on this bro, but I have to say after thinking about this for a while I have to agree with Van_B. Luv, and AJ. The last thing I want to create here is a bunch of yes men. I do how ever wish there was a way to clean up this board. We have a great board here with lots of really good members, it would be a shame to see more of the good members leave which will happen if this board is not cleaned up. Trab and a few other good ones have already moved on.
-
Im pretty new to the forum but love the info from alot you guys. Over the few months Ive been on I have even spotted a few bogus guys. I agree we should try to get rid of the wannabes and talkers. Its too bad some people have to F__k up a good thing.
-
Im pretty new to the forum but love the info from alot you guys. Over the few months Ive been on I have even spotted a few bogus guys. I agree we should try to get rid of the wannabes and talkers. Its too bad some people have to F__k up a good thing.
good post
-
Since we as mods can not ban members on this board, I am thinking about making a sticky for members who's advice is not to be trusted. This will in no way be a list that we will add names to just because somebody does not like somebody else. This will be a serious list to help protect the good members and new members of the board. This is the hardcore section and I think good solid info is paramount. Ive had enough of members telling newbs its great to run 1000mg test first cycle, and telling newbs to not come off. I'm also tired of twinks coming over here and telling people its a great idea to run oral only cycles, with no thought to how an oral only could affect someone with no test production. I'm truly tired of the bs on this board as of late.
I'm thinking the sticky will only be allowed to be accessed by the mods and we as a team along with suggestions from vets of the board will make the decision of who's name to post on the list. The shit that goes on, on this board really pisses me off, and would not be tolerated anywhere else.
I would like good solid opinions here. No trash talk and no bs, just good solid opinions.
I'm for it, but anyone who's been on here for any length of time knows which people to stay away from.
The "tbombz" of the world need to take heed, they are being outed.....
I think we all want solid contributions to the forum, but you know there are always going to be a few knuckleheads around.
DIV
-
I'm for it, but anyone who's been on here for any length of time knows which people to stay away from.
The "tbombz" of the world need to take heed, they are being outed.....
I think we all want solid contributions to the forum, but you know there are always going to be a few knuckleheads around.
DIV
All I want for this is for the name calling to stop and the BS to stop. Its getting harder and harder every day to stop this board from turning into the G&O. I have really great members on my other board that wont post here, because they know GB is like the wild west. In a way I like that, because I'm pretty thick skinned, but it doesn't belong in a serious forum like the hardcore boards.
-
I'd really like to see Tbombz shoot up to the top of the ranks as far as steroid knowledge. I mean afterall he was 180lbs at 17. And his nutritional knowldege is even more insightful than his pharamcological info.
-
I'd really like to see Tbombz shoot up to the top of the ranks as far as steroid knowledge. I mean afterall he was 180lbs at 17. And his nutritional knowldege is even more insightful than his pharamcological info.
What does this mean?
jt
-
I'd really like to see Tbombz shoot up to the top of the ranks as far as steroid knowledge. I mean afterall he was 180lbs at 17. And his nutritional knowldege is even more insightful than his pharamcological info.
You have to have personal experience with AAS to gain the "knowledge".
He's a novice, yet insists on trying to give advice to others.
It doesn't work that way, thus.......he is shunned. :-X
DIV
-
I'd really like to see Tbombz shoot up to the top of the ranks as far as steroid knowledge. I mean afterall he was 180lbs at 17. And his nutritional knowldege is even more insightful than his pharamcological info.
Pharmacological info is one thing. Book knowledge combined with personal experience is another. You can read all day long how to cycle properly but when you are actually running the cycle, things aren't always black and white.
-
what does 180lbs at 17 have to do with it?
-
what does 180lbs at 17 have to do with it?
nothing.....