Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: MuscleMcMannus on April 21, 2009, 01:22:34 AM

Title: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: MuscleMcMannus on April 21, 2009, 01:22:34 AM
bodybuilders still posing in fucking string bikinis/thongs?  I mean seriously.  Why not some fucking regular boy shorts/trunk type clothing.  Is it really necessary to see some floss stuck up their ass and their twig ang berries ready to pop out of their thong?  It's fucking gay!  I don't get why bodybuilders even wear them if they don't have to.  Is it IFBB rules?  If so IFBB is run by a bunch of homos.  What say you Ron and Chick? 
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Schmoe Buster on April 21, 2009, 01:26:38 AM
bodybuilders still posing in fucking string bikinis/thongs?  I mean seriously.  Why not some fucking regular boy shorts/trunk type clothing.  Is it really necessary to see some floss stuck up their ass and their twig ang berries ready to pop out of their thong?  It's fucking gay!  I don't get why bodybuilders even wear them if they don't have to.  Is it IFBB rules?  If so IFBB is run by a bunch of homos.  What say you Ron and Chick? 

pretty much ;D
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: DK II on April 21, 2009, 01:35:40 AM
bodybuilders still posing in fucking string bikinis/thongs?  I mean seriously.  Why not some fucking regular boy shorts/trunk type clothing.  Is it really necessary to see some floss stuck up their ass and their twig ang berries ready to pop out of their thong?  It's fucking gay!  I don't get why bodybuilders even wear them if they don't have to.  Is it IFBB rules?  If so IFBB is run by a bunch of homos.  What say you Ron and Chick? 

x2
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: wavelength on April 21, 2009, 01:52:07 AM
IMO, bodybuilders could just as well be judged without taking into account ass striations and groin veins.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: pillowtalk on April 21, 2009, 01:55:01 AM
bodybuilders still posing in fucking string bikinis/thongs?  I mean seriously.  Why not some fucking regular boy shorts/trunk type clothing.  Is it really necessary to see some floss stuck up their ass and their twig ang berries ready to pop out of their thong?  It's fucking gay!  I don't get why bodybuilders even wear them if they don't have to.  Is it IFBB rules?  If so IFBB is run by a bunch of homos.  What say you Ron and Chick? 

Epic Homophobic reaction  ;D
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Mars on April 21, 2009, 02:26:44 AM
i like the training part of this sport, like to see these pros train in the gym on vids, also cool to check if they improved in these weeks out pictures and how they appear on stage but the posing stuff and everything around it is gay as hell offcourse.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: calfzilla on April 21, 2009, 02:33:22 AM
Gotta keep the gay customer base happy cuz they are the ones with the $$$. 
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: MuscleMcMannus on April 21, 2009, 02:36:19 AM
So far no one has answered my question though.  Obviously not all the pros are gay.  So is it mandated by the IFBB that they parade around in thongs?  I mean hell does it really make or break an IFBB Olympian by how striated his ass is and the judges need to visually see it? 
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: DK II on April 21, 2009, 02:36:32 AM
Gotta keep the gay customer base happy cuz they are the ones with the $$$. 

$$$ and also the IFBB clearly has a monopol on roided out freaks.

They should go more into the gay community though, Chick is all for prostitution and drug abuse, they could make a lot of bucks if they made a "gay-special" so to speak. An official IFBB live event where Kai can fuck grapefruits and pose naked and stuff.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: wavelength on April 21, 2009, 02:54:03 AM
Mom, may I introduce you to the Arnold classic champion.
You can find out all about him next time you surf the internets.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Schmoe Buster on April 21, 2009, 03:04:53 AM
$$$ and also the IFBB clearly has a monopol on roided out freaks.

They should go more into the gay community though, Chick is all for prostitution and drug abuse, they could make a lot of bucks if they made a "gay-special" so to speak. An official IFBB live event where Kai can fuck grapefruits and pose naked and stuff.


they could call the contest the Bob Chick Pro Invitational ;D
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: MuscleMcMannus on April 21, 2009, 03:11:52 AM
$$$ and also the IFBB clearly has a monopol on roided out freaks.

They should go more into the gay community though, Chick is all for prostitution and drug abuse, they could make a lot of bucks if they made a "gay-special" so to speak. An official IFBB live event where Kai can fuck grapefruits and pose naked and stuff.


Screw the grapefruit just throw Isaac in a thong and have Kai chase him around.  They'd make way more cash that way :) LOL.   
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: DK II on April 21, 2009, 03:14:16 AM
Mom, may I introduce you to the Arnold classic champion.
You can find out all about him next time you surf the internets.

Do me a favor and do a picture search for "bodybuilder" on google, i bet you will find gay pics or porn on the forst three pages.  :-X

they could call the contest the Bob Chick Pro Invitational ;D

Good idea, Chick has stated often that he is not against gays, prostitution, porn or drug abuse.


Screw the grapefruit just throw Isaac in a thong and have Kai chase him around.  They'd make way more cash that way :) LOL.  

lol
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: kreator on April 21, 2009, 03:19:24 AM
every gym rat has a little attention whore within them but stepping on stage and actually flexing your muscles in front of other people is just plain childish and ridiculous for a grown man/woman to do
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: DK II on April 21, 2009, 03:21:56 AM
every gym rat has a little attention whore within them but stepping on stage and actually flexing your muscles in front of other people is just plain childish and ridiculous for a grown man/woman to do

I agree, these people lack major appreciation in fields of life that count, i.e. love from your parents/lover/kids, or success in school/job/free time.

Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: LatsMcGee on April 21, 2009, 03:26:33 AM
"......your balls are showing...."
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: spinnis on April 21, 2009, 03:30:17 AM
Sometimes I wish I would be an amazing bodybuilder because I would step on the olympia stage in the type of "trunks" that Arnold had, just to prove a fucking point.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Beener on April 21, 2009, 04:09:37 AM
IMO, bodybuilders could just as well be judged without taking into account ass striations and groin veins.

No.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Chick on April 21, 2009, 05:20:34 AM
LOL....What do you know....another "not gay" thread about how small BBers trunks are


Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: DK II on April 21, 2009, 05:22:18 AM
LOL....What do you know....another "not gay" thread about how small BBers trunks are




What do you think about the idea of the Bob Chick invitational, Chick?

Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Army of One on April 21, 2009, 05:23:07 AM
LOL....What do you know....another "not gay" thread about how small BBers trunks are




From the man who is the official representative of oiled up men in thongs, oh the irony  ::)
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: spinnis on April 21, 2009, 05:25:18 AM
From the man who is the official representative of oiled up men in thongs, oh the irony  ::)

accordingly to Chick its GAY to try to Ungay this "sport" funny dude huh?
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Chick on April 21, 2009, 05:27:53 AM
From the man who is the official representative of oiled up men in thongs, oh the irony  ::)
[/quote
The irony is...I'm not the one bringing it up....guys like YOU are.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: wavelength on April 21, 2009, 05:29:54 AM
It's brought up because there are a lot of people who like bodybuilding except for certain aspects of it like thongs and certain forms of presentation.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: DK II on April 21, 2009, 05:30:25 AM
accordingly to Chick its GAY to try to Ungay this "sport" funny dude huh?

Yes.  ::) ::)


The irony is...I'm not the one bringing it up....guys like YOU are.

The funny thing is, no one would say that Al Quaida are US-Americans because they want to get rid of them and permanently talk about them.  ::) ::)
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: webcake on April 21, 2009, 05:33:58 AM
I don't get Bob. He is the athletes rep and says he wants what is best for the sport, yet he has no interest in taking a small step which WOULD improve the image of the sport........ :-\
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: DK II on April 21, 2009, 05:35:18 AM
I don't get Bob. He is the athletes rep and says he wants what is best for the sport, yet he has no interest in taking a small step which WOULD improve the image of the sport........ :-\

Instead he is on getbig and argues that drug abuse, prostitution and gay porn are good for the "sport".
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: webcake on April 21, 2009, 05:37:09 AM
Instead he is on getbig and argues that drug abuse, prostitution and gay porn are good for the "sport".

Yes, it's quite odd.

I mean we aren't taking about more sponsors, more money or better promotion of the sport. They all take a lot of time and effort.

Banning thongs = take 2 minutes at the next meeting and costs nothing. Why not do it?!
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: lovemonkey on April 21, 2009, 05:37:31 AM
I don't get Bob. He is the athletes rep and says he wants what is best for the sport, yet he has no interest in taking a small step which WOULD improve the image of the sport........ :-\

He doesn't wanna be accused of focusing on gay matters, you see. If he's this homophobic/homoparanoid as we've seen in this thread, I think just for him to mention the word "thong" in an athlete meeting would make him blush really bad.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: DK II on April 21, 2009, 05:40:12 AM
He doesn't wanna be accused of focusing on gay matters, you see. If he's this homophobic/homoparanoid as we've seen in this thread, I think just for him to mention the word "thong" in an athlete meeting would make him blush really bad.

instead he focuses on his "hollywood career".
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: hipolito mejia on April 21, 2009, 05:40:22 AM
bodybuilders still posing in fucking string bikinis/thongs?  I mean seriously. ... IFBB is run by a bunch of homos.  What say you Ron and Chick? 


There you have it ,what's even funny that theres alot of gay people who think theres no need to have a bb on thong posing on stage...... so IFBB its a mix of Gays and schmoes and everything in between.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: spinnis on April 21, 2009, 05:41:42 AM
Even fuckng Baygm or whatever his name is things the thongs are to small. And hes a gay guy.
That proves something now doesn't it?
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Immortal_Technique on April 21, 2009, 05:42:51 AM
I don't get Bob. He is the athletes rep and says he wants what is best for the sport, yet he has no interest in taking a small step which WOULD improve the image of the sport........ :-\

You could argue that catering for fans who actually have some interesting in gauging competitors' conditioning is good for the sport  ::)
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: lovemonkey on April 21, 2009, 05:43:48 AM
Even fuckng Baygm or whatever his name is things the thongs are to small. And hes a gay guy.
That proves something now doesn't it?

I just want to thank you Swede! for owning Alex23, the fat french homo.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: DK II on April 21, 2009, 05:47:02 AM

There you have it ,what's even funny that theres alot of gay people who think theres no need to have a bb on thong posing on stage...... so IFBB its a mix of Gays and schmoes and everything in between.

ThatS# why i said, they should have the Bob Chick Invitational, a purely gay BB event. Only naked guys, some masturbating and blowjobs live on stage, some tiger costumes and grapefruits.

Then they gays are satisfied and all the closet homos going to the other shows do not have to fear that they are labeled as gay.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: webcake on April 21, 2009, 05:48:59 AM
ThatS# why i said, they should have the Bob Chick Invitational, a purely gay BB event. Only naked guys, some masturbating and blowjobs live on stage, some tiger costumes and grapefruits.

Then they gays are satisfied and all the closet homos going to the other shows do not have to fear that they are labeled as gay.

That's all well and good, but remember, according to chick (rep. of the men in thongs) we are gay for even discussing this....... :-\
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: DK II on April 21, 2009, 05:52:40 AM
That's all well and good, but remember, according to chick (rep. of the men in thongs) we are gay for even discussing this....... :-\

ahahaha, yes, and bodybuilders aren't abusing steroids.

Chick = Alice in Wonderland. Including the fancy dresses.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Chick on April 21, 2009, 05:54:46 AM
There was a day when the trunks were bigger....BB wasn't anymore popular then.

Continue on, my "not gay" friends!
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: hipolito mejia on April 21, 2009, 05:57:12 AM
They IFBB  wants BB to be known (looked) as a sport ,so why they dont treat it as one?


Yes the true $$$$$ its on the schomes, in fact,  IFBB rules are changing for the worse!!  both The Mr.O and the Arnold would have a new round where bb can dress like Siegfried &Roy and dance the Macarena and win extra points and CASH.....  nevermind the G string.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: webcake on April 21, 2009, 05:59:00 AM
There was a day when the trunks were bigger....BB wasn't anymore popular then.

Continue on, my "not gay" friends!

Not about making it more popular, it's about making it less of a joke.

What would you rather see, Toney Freeman wearing larger, black trunks.........or the cow print and bullet thong he is currently parading.

Wake the fuck up, Bob. I know you work for a bunch of old homos, but at least have the balls to try and make this sport better.  ::)
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: jr on April 21, 2009, 06:00:12 AM
muscle men
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: lovemonkey on April 21, 2009, 06:04:10 AM
There was a day when the trunks were bigger....BB wasn't anymore popular then.

Continue on, my "not gay" friends!

BB boomed in the 90's due to other factors so that's an unfair statement. It wouldn't hurt to try bigger trunks again, would it?
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Chick on April 21, 2009, 06:15:57 AM
BB boomed in the 90's due to other factors so that's an unfair statement. It wouldn't hurt to try bigger trunks again, would it?

Actually...you just made my argument. You're exactly right...it was OTHER factors that led to the boom...none having to do with the size of trunks (which were the same as today)

If anyone thinks adding two inches of fabric will translate into money, they're smoking crack
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: jr on April 21, 2009, 06:16:07 AM
bring back the bodybuilding burka.

allah ackbar, jihad
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: webcake on April 21, 2009, 06:18:35 AM
Actually...you just made my argument. You're exactly right...it was OTHER factors that led to the boom...none having to do with the size of trunks (which were the same as today)

If anyone thinks adding two inches of fabric will translate into money, they're smoking crack

Trunks have gotten progressively smaller since the 90's. Even you know this.

And for the millionth time, it's not about more money, it's about the image of the sport and making it seem less of a joke.

2 minutes Bob, that is all it would take at a meeting.......why not?
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Chick on April 21, 2009, 06:22:48 AM
It's been brought up....no one cares.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: jr on April 21, 2009, 06:23:58 AM
When are we going to judge penis vascularity, thickness and symmetry. Abolish the thong.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: rccs on April 21, 2009, 06:24:32 AM
The thongs are pretty much ridiculous. BBing should become less schmoeistic and gayish. And also abolsish the shitty gay music posing routine were most bbers look like 30€ strippers to fest the eyes of the "Shitmoes"
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: webcake on April 21, 2009, 06:26:47 AM
It's been brought up....no one cares.

No one cares about improving the image of the sport? ???

Jesus, those old schmoes who run this joint need to hurry up and retire/die already.

Maybe when they are out of the picture, some changes can be made....... ::)
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: jr on April 21, 2009, 06:28:27 AM
Judges should be female. Then we will truly know what the ideal physique is
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: buffdnet on April 21, 2009, 06:29:19 AM
Quote
The irony is...I'm not the one bringing it up....guys like YOU are.
who are also guys that purchase show tickets, mags and supps.
you're a dumbshit yes man
at best
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Chick on April 21, 2009, 06:42:14 AM
who are also guys that purchase show tickets, mags and supps.
you're a dumbshit yes man
at best


LOL....trust me,....the overwhelming majority of people that post on this site, have never been to a show, purchased tickets, or in any way, shape or form supported the BB community....much less ever seen the inside of a gym.

scram
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Option D on April 21, 2009, 06:44:27 AM
Epic Homophobic reaction  ;D
(http://www.lolforumpictures.com/gtfo/gtfo4.jpg) (http://"http://www.lolforumpictures.com")
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: DK II on April 21, 2009, 06:45:06 AM

LOL....trust me,....the overwhelming majority of people that post on this site, have never been to a show, purchased tickets, or in any way, shape or form supported the BB community....much less ever seen the inside of a gym.

scram

You're an idiot, Chick.

It's always the same here, you say BB is gay or that BB are drug abusing criminals and it means that you don't work out.

I'd rather assume that it's the other way round, all the gay Schmoes that go to the Expos and "support" the community never work out, but the guys that actually do work out turn away because of all the gay porn going on in BB.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: bigdumbbell on April 21, 2009, 06:45:41 AM
so are you proposing attire standards.  well, make a proposal that includes all contestants(female and male).  one way is having everyone wear the same type...no variations.  a standard outfit for women and men.  perhaps award an exclusive to a startup company for a standard competition suit.  personally i don't give a shit about what people wear on event day or how ridiculous they look.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Dballn247 on April 21, 2009, 06:46:52 AM
Someone posted that it was an Auction with Gays bidding.  Funny shit.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: lovemonkey on April 21, 2009, 06:49:00 AM
Actually...you just made my argument. You're exactly right...it was OTHER factors that led to the boom...none having to do with the size of trunks (which were the same as today)

If anyone thinks adding two inches of fabric will translate into money, they're smoking crack

No what I was trying to say is that it's impossible to draw any conclusions on whether bigger/smaller trunks made the difference. So it wouldn't hurt to try, right?
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: MuscleMcMannus on April 21, 2009, 06:49:37 AM
Actually...you just made my argument. You're exactly right...it was OTHER factors that led to the boom...none having to do with the size of trunks (which were the same as today)

If anyone thinks adding two inches of fabric will translate into money, they're smoking crack

NO but it would translate into a little bit of respect and dignity.  I mean you never answered my question.  Are these thongs and itty bitty bikinis required by the IFBB or simply "encouraged"????? LOL.  How did it feel as you yourself had to stand up there in a thong Chick?  Did you feel less of a man or more of a chick?   
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: bigdumbbell on April 21, 2009, 06:51:02 AM
Someone posted that it was an Auction with Gays bidding.  Funny shit.

you wouldn't be surprised at the number of child predators who go to teen cheerleading events.  the vast overwhelming majority are heterosexual.  hope this helps.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Option D on April 21, 2009, 06:51:14 AM

LOL....trust me,....the overwhelming majority of people that post on this site, have never been to a show, purchased tickets, or in any way, shape or form supported the BB community....much less ever seen the inside of a gym.

scram

I do think the thong thing is wack. And i have been to many shows. Compteted and been to a gym many times. Bob youre cool, but come on man dont go there. Just because people dont agree with somestuff (its just the thong pics and the grapefruit fucking that goes unchecked that gets me) you cant discount their place in the bb community.  People have a right to criticize the sport they like. Im not callin you an idiot like others tho. Youre still cool in my book (im sure it dont mean shit to you anyway ;D )
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: wavelength on April 21, 2009, 07:01:58 AM
Competitive bodybuilding is a very small part of bodybuilding. The general public (including most people who workout = build their bodies) will always find the current form of competitive bodybuilding awkward. I don't see how attending a show would change that. Of course it's brought up constantly -  because it's awkward, not because people bringing it up are gay and don't workout. That's like saying if I bring up the topic of not liking the Village People means that I am gay and have never actually listened to any form of music at all.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: webcake on April 21, 2009, 07:08:42 AM
Gotta love the typical bb'er reply "you don't even workout"  ::)
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: DK II on April 21, 2009, 07:10:42 AM
Gotta love the typical bb'er reply "you don't even workout"  ::)

Yes, as if that would do anything.

It means nothing to the people who don't workout and people who do workout just give a shit about it.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Option D on April 21, 2009, 07:11:32 AM
Gotta love the typical bb'er reply "you don't even workout"  ::)

Right...in debate..isnt that a argumentative fallacy.."argument from authority"

You state a fact and the other side discounts it by saying "what authority do you have to speak"

its a fact none the less reguardless of where it is comming from.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Blockhead on April 21, 2009, 07:12:16 AM
Gotta keep the gay customer base happy cuz they are the ones with the $$$. 
Bingo! ALL of the publications such as IM, Flex, M&F and especially MD know that majority of their readers and buyers of their magazine are ho mos so they try to appeal to them first. I mean, come on... FLEX in the 90's. Tiny cootchie cutter jean shorts on, purple socks, work boots and a torn flannel shirt on hese guys in he gym?


 - Block!
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Option D on April 21, 2009, 07:14:07 AM
Bingo! ALL of the publications such as IM, Flex, M&F and especially MD know that majority of their readers and buyers of their magazine are ho mos so they try to appeal to them first. I mean, come on... FLEX in the 90's. Tiny cootchie cutter jean shorts on, purple socks, work boots and a torn flannel shirt on hese guys in he gym?


 - Block!


lmao....dont forget the cutoff jean shirts with the daisy dukes (on guys) and work boots...look like one of them homo calenders
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: DK II on April 21, 2009, 07:16:58 AM

lmao....dont forget the cutoff jean shirts with the daisy dukes (on guys) and work boots...look like one of them homo calenders

Why the fuck do these guys dress up like the village people or wear lion costumes and stuff in the first place?

I think FLEX and MD have a huge readership of middle aged closet homos that have to hide their passion from their poor wives. Here's the money. If you make it less gay, these poeple jump off, if you make it too gay, the stop buying as well.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: bigdumbbell on April 21, 2009, 07:19:39 AM
Bingo! ALL of the publications such as IM, Flex, M&F and especially MD know that majority of their readers and buyers of their magazine are ho mos so they try to appeal to them first. I mean, come on... FLEX in the 90's. Tiny cootchie cutter jean shorts on, purple socks, work boots and a torn flannel shirt on hese guys in he gym?


 - Block!
 :)  let's face it the queens have the cash for the 7 dollar infomercials FLEX and MD produce.  it's a consumer driven market.  the white trash buying the Pampers at the check out line ain't plopping down the cash for a magazine with a steroid freak male wearing daisy dukes.  but the metrosexual will
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Chick on April 21, 2009, 07:22:34 AM
NO but it would translate into a little bit of respect and dignity.  I mean you never answered my question.  Are these thongs and itty bitty bikinis required by the IFBB or simply "encouraged"????? LOL.  How did it feel as you yourself had to stand up there in a thong Chick?  Did you feel less of a man or more of a chick?   

I dont know...I've  never worn a thong. On stage or otherwise.

The smaller trunks have evolved as the criteria in BB changed...in the old days, we wore trunks to COVER our asses, not show them off. 

If the judges stopped rewarding glute striations over shape, or symmetry or proportion or muscularity...then there would be no need to show them off.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Option D on April 21, 2009, 07:23:57 AM
I dont know...I've worn a thong. On stage or otherwise.

The smaller trunks have evolved as the criteria in BB changed...in the old days, we wore trunks to COVER our asses, not show them off. 

If the judges stopped rewarding glute striations over shape, or symmetry or proportion or muscularity...then there would be no need to show them off.
Best Explaination ever in life from you Bob...Im proud of you bro...
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: hipolito mejia on April 21, 2009, 07:25:09 AM
Actually...you just made my argument.

If anyone thinks adding two inches of fabric will translate into money, they're smoking crack

Translation : "Our main concern its the money that comes straight from the schmoe pocket, to hell with dignity or the right image"
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: CalvinH on April 21, 2009, 07:26:00 AM
So where are the pics of bb's in thongs ???
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: DK II on April 21, 2009, 07:26:10 AM
I dont know...I've worn a thong. On stage or otherwise.

The smaller trunks have evolved as the criteria in BB changed...in the old days, we wore trunks to COVER our asses, not show them off. 

If the judges stopped rewarding glute striations over shape, or symmetry or proportion or muscularity...then there would be no need to show them off.

ahahahaha, Chick is evading the question and giving the bad card on to someone else like always!

Now it's the judges that are gay? These people KNOW what the IFBB wants i.e. more money from the gay community.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Option D on April 21, 2009, 07:27:33 AM
So where are the pics of bb's in thongs ???
(http://www.lolforumpictures.com/gtfo/gtfo6.jpg) (http://"http://www.lolforumpictures.com")
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: bigdumbbell on April 21, 2009, 07:28:23 AM
ahahahaha, Chick is evading the question and giving the bad card on to someone else like always!

Now it's the judges that are gay? These people KNOW what the IFBB wants i.e. more money from the gay community.
of course it's about money, it's a business not a charity   lol
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: DK II on April 21, 2009, 07:30:30 AM
of course it's about money, it's a business not a charity   lol

Sure, i never said that.

We get drug abusing criminals dancing in thongs in front of gays because it brings more money than naturals in shorts.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: bigdumbbell on April 21, 2009, 07:35:38 AM
Sure, i never said that.

We get drug abusing criminals dancing in thongs in front of gays because it brings more money than naturals in shorts.
i've been to a few strip clubs in my life and it's kind of boring
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Option D on April 21, 2009, 07:37:03 AM
.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: CalvinH on April 21, 2009, 07:38:20 AM
(http://www.lolforumpictures.com/gtfo/gtfo6.jpg) (http://"http://www.lolforumpictures.com")




 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Option D on April 21, 2009, 07:41:16 AM



 ;D ;D ;D

THOSE SHITS ARE HILARIOUS!!!!!!!!!
http://www.forumspile.com/
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: DK II on April 21, 2009, 07:41:40 AM
i've been to a few strip clubs in my life and it's kind of boring

Are you saying BB-shows are more interesting than strip shows?
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: bigdumbbell on April 21, 2009, 07:44:38 AM
Are you saying BB-shows are more interesting than strip shows?
actually i like the compare/contrast much more than the overwhelming jive routines of the 'show'.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: lovemonkey on April 21, 2009, 07:46:14 AM
I've been to a BB show once. If I ever get a severe case of insomnia I know where to go.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: DK II on April 21, 2009, 07:47:43 AM
I've been to a BB show once. If I ever get a severe case of insomnia I know where to go.

Be careful that you don't get fumbled at when you fall asleep.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: bigdumbbell on April 21, 2009, 08:28:07 AM
Be careful that you don't get fumbled at when you fall asleep.
impossible i'm an art historian, connoisseur, weight training, businessman farmer and homosexual with a sense of decorum and propriety  :D
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Mars on April 21, 2009, 08:29:44 AM
(http://www.dixiworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/wtf_of_the_week_009.jpg)
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: BayGBM on April 21, 2009, 08:56:04 AM
IMO, bodybuilders could just as well be judged without taking into account ass striations and groin veins.


;D

I agree. http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=128181.0

Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: calfzilla on April 21, 2009, 08:56:31 AM
LMAO WTF that is Mars's craziest pic yet! 
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Mars on April 21, 2009, 08:57:56 AM
im glad at least someone comments to my pics.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: calfzilla on April 21, 2009, 09:01:44 AM
im glad at least someone comments to my pics.
Is that porno?  Likes like it is either porno or a kids movie lol. 
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: BayGBM on April 21, 2009, 09:05:14 AM
When are we going to judge penis vascularity, thickness and symmetry. Abolish the thong.


Ha ha ha ha  That's the direction we are headed in...  ::)
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: kyomu on April 21, 2009, 09:12:13 AM
IFBB is run by a bunch of homos.
Thats true. Seriously.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: calfzilla on April 21, 2009, 09:13:31 AM
IFBB is runed by a bunch of homos.
Thats true. Seriously.
What gives Kyomu?  I thought you were refusing the competitor stars?  I no longer feel good enough to talk to you.   :'(
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: kyomu on April 21, 2009, 09:22:07 AM
What gives Kyomu?  I thought you were refusing the competitor stars?  I no longer feel good enough to talk to you.   :'(
Nothing.
What do you want to say?
Did I say any opinion?
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: calfzilla on April 21, 2009, 09:24:28 AM
Nothing.
What do you want to say?
Did I say any opinion?
Yes you said you didn't want the blue stars because you just want to be a normal getbigger.  Now you have them.  What gives? 
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: zwide on April 21, 2009, 09:26:25 AM
I do understand how frustrating it can be about the size of the trunks .. however you guys are in the Western World where sex sells... :D :D

Disagree all you want but thats what contributed to the boom because it does sell greatly to the schoemos and the other smaller market that appreciate nudity ..

No need to go through the boom that has come through .....

None of you here advocating for bigger thongs are Pros or competing .. the guys who are putting them on should make a statement or protest .. by wearing bigger ...
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: kyomu on April 21, 2009, 09:27:12 AM
Yes you said you didn't want the blue stars because you just want to be a normal getbigger.  Now you have them.  What gives? 
I didnt want. But seem like many people worked for it.
So now I considered this stars as a present from my beloved getbigers.
I cant throw a present to a trush no?
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: calfzilla on April 21, 2009, 09:28:30 AM
I didnt want. But seem like many people worked for it.
So now I considered this stars as a present from my beloved getbigers.
I cant throw a present to a trush no?
Ok Kyomu I understand now.  You are a good man, and bodybuilding is still the muscle!   :D
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: kyomu on April 21, 2009, 09:30:18 AM
Ok Kyomu I understand now.  You are just a good man, and bodybuilding is still ALWAYS the muscle!   :D
Fixed.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: CastIron on April 21, 2009, 09:38:08 AM
bodybuilders still posing in fucking string bikinis/thongs?  I mean seriously.  Why not some fucking regular boy shorts/trunk type clothing.  Is it really necessary to see some floss stuck up their ass and their twig ang berries ready to pop out of their thong?  It's fucking gay!  I don't get why bodybuilders even wear them if they don't have to.  Is it IFBB rules?  If so IFBB is run by a bunch of homos.  What say you Ron and Chick? 

It's kinda gay..
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: chainsaw on April 21, 2009, 09:41:20 AM
So far no one has answered my question though.  Obviously not all the pros are gay.  So is it mandated by the IFBB that they parade around in thongs?  I mean hell does it really make or break an IFBB Olympian by how striated his ass is and the judges need to visually see it? 
I agree, the men should be dressed in tight boxers or such,
and I think all women should have to be totally nude.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: bigdumbbell on April 21, 2009, 09:47:16 AM
IFBB is run by a bunch of homos.
Thats true. Seriously.
u should have not been granted blue stars
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: DK II on April 23, 2009, 03:46:34 AM
I agree, the men should be dressed in tight boxers or such,
and I think all women should have to be totally nude.

figure and fitness, yes.
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: MuscleMcMannus on April 23, 2009, 04:06:16 AM
Chick never answered the question.  Are these man thongs mandated by the IFBB?  IF so why?  Is it to pander to closet homos? 
Title: Re: Seriously an age old debate but why the hell are......
Post by: Get Rowdy on April 23, 2009, 04:18:08 AM
(http://www.dixiworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/wtf_of_the_week_009.jpg)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

made my day.