Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Misc Discussion Boards => E-Board - Movies, Music, TV, Videogames, Comics => Topic started by: Bast175 on May 22, 2009, 02:01:39 PM

Title: picture of ron avidan's penis.
Post by: Bast175 on May 22, 2009, 02:01:39 PM
(http://www.undershirtguy.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/hugh-jackman-wearing-zimmerli-richelieu-ribbed-tank-1.jpg)
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: Bast175 on May 22, 2009, 02:03:52 PM
i would think he was, but in an interview he said he ate 5000 calories....  Too much to get that lean on.
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: Mars on May 22, 2009, 02:26:46 PM
easely attainable natural, very small guy whos just cut up.
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: jtsunami on May 22, 2009, 02:27:07 PM
not natural, for a white man to get that ripped and muscles, whites don't have the genetics for it, also he is older so you have to take into account lower test, he is on something.

jt
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: elite_lifter on May 22, 2009, 02:35:23 PM
(http://www.undershirtguy.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/hugh-jackman-wearing-zimmerli-richelieu-ribbed-tank-1.jpg)
He has more money/hotter women/and an all around better life then you so no need to concern yourself if he is natural or not. BTW you are a tiny tit.
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: Team Diver on May 22, 2009, 02:36:40 PM
(http://imagecache.allposters.com/images/pic/CLASS/847753~Clint-Eastwood-Posters.jpg)
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: Rami on May 22, 2009, 02:38:23 PM
it's achievable for a natural, but he is most likely not.
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: Boost on May 22, 2009, 02:38:58 PM
Inside sources were suggesting 4 grams test per week

Apparently the make up team had a nightmare trying to cover up all the side effects.

Bacne, Terrible facial acne, that's why he's covered with inches of make up during the movie.

Clumps of hair were falling out during the action scenes apparently.

Rumours going round that he's on dialysis for life as a result.
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: timfogarty on May 22, 2009, 02:41:49 PM
easely attainable natural, very small guy whos just cut up.

at 21 sure.  at 41 not so likely
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: Genius on May 22, 2009, 03:25:09 PM
I don't think Hugh Jackedman is natural.
He is too busy.. needs results fast..
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: Mr Nobody on May 22, 2009, 03:26:12 PM
He must of stayed in India and starved for this shot
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: affeman on May 22, 2009, 03:27:38 PM
(http://www.undershirtguy.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/hugh-jackman-wearing-zimmerli-richelieu-ribbed-tank-1.jpg)

Not natural, airbrush, photoshop and special FX.
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: Genius on May 22, 2009, 03:27:59 PM
"Dubai, India?"


 :P
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: affeman on May 22, 2009, 03:28:42 PM
Not natural, airbrush, photoshop and special FX.

This fucker has not a single vein on his body in real life. ::)

(http://images.celeb9.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/hugh_jackman.jpg)
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: The Showstoppa on May 22, 2009, 03:35:51 PM
This fucker has not a single vein on his body in real life. ::)

(http://images.celeb9.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/hugh_jackman.jpg)

haha, his forearms make me feel like Popeye....
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: Deicide on May 22, 2009, 03:36:13 PM
This fucker has not a single vein on his body in real life. ::)

(http://images.celeb9.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/hugh_jackman.jpg)


Mutant genetics.
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: Genius on May 22, 2009, 03:37:52 PM
Before the movie(s):

Clen? No. Too dangerous.
Vinny? Maybe.
GH? Not likely.

What do you think? (anyone?)

Of course! He has the mutantgene!

Title: Re: natural?
Post by: gh15 on May 22, 2009, 03:41:08 PM
this is little winstrol since he dotn need heavy lifting,,winstrol for driness with diet for the movie,,very tall very thin,,,got good definition due to low body fat and the winstrol keep the little muscle mass he has ,,tablets he dont inject

gh15 approved
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: affeman on May 22, 2009, 03:42:54 PM
Before the movie(s):

Clen? No. Too dangerous.
Vinny? Maybe.
GH? Not likely.

What do you think? (anyone?)

Of course! He has the mutantgene!



NOTHING! Airbrush and Special FX, that's all. Check out set pics, they all look like nothing! Same goes for the 300 guys.

We are not in the 80s anymore where actors indeed had to juice themselves up like Schwarzenegger and Stallone, they simply didn't have the post-production possibilities back then to make a ripped monster on screen out of a skinnyfat actor. Today they have, why would an actor still risk his health?? ::)
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: Boost on May 22, 2009, 03:45:20 PM
haha, his forearms make me feel like Popeye....
x2
I thought I had garbage forearms but those things look completely untrained
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: Genius on May 22, 2009, 04:05:29 PM
NOTHING! Airbrush and Special FX, that's all. Check out set pics, they all look like nothing! Same goes for the 300 guys.

We are not in the 80s anymore where actors indeed had to juice themselves up like Schwarzenegger and Stallone, they simply didn't have the post-production possibilities back then to make a ripped monster on screen out of a skinnyfat actor. Today they have, why would an actor still risk his health?? ::)

I saw the workprint.. he actually had the winnesque physique..
But I agree with you regarding the health..
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: mazrim on May 22, 2009, 04:20:03 PM
Natural. All he did was lose some bodyfat for the movie. Always had vascularity in arms and shoulder even at higher bodyfat levels. Also not all that lean in the movie. Never shown in clear lighting anywhere except when he is lying on the table and he is not all that low in bodyfat or that high in muscularity in that scene. Otherwise always favorable lighting and in that lighting it was mainly from the neck up with him yelling/flexing causing veins to pop out. Good physique, nothing to suggest steroids.
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: YngiweRhoads on May 22, 2009, 05:37:50 PM
at 21 sure.  at 41 not so likely

Uhh...yeah it is.
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: ManBearPig... on May 22, 2009, 05:58:47 PM
has anyone seen him host the oscars?

he was 170 tops.  come on.  i'll scream steroids as much as anyone else, but not every single dude on the planet with abs is on steroids.
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: jtsunami on May 22, 2009, 06:01:38 PM
How dare you? There are alot of Aryan bastards with muscles!  >:(

no doubt, he is 41 though!

Title: Re: natural?
Post by: Van_Bilderass on May 22, 2009, 06:04:03 PM
he was 170 tops.  come on.  i'll scream steroids as much as anyone else, but not every single dude on the planet with abs is on steroids.

Do you know what Stallone weighed for Rambo II?
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: Montague on May 22, 2009, 06:18:09 PM
From www.sylvesterstallone.co m:
Quote
When Stallone first came to Franco to begin training, he was 170 pounds and very well defined. But he didn't feel he was big enough and wanted to put on 10 pounds of muscle in six weeks. Franco knew how hard Stallone was capable of training, so he decided that was a feasible goal.
"Sylvester gained just about 10 pounds in six and a half weeks," Franco says. "He has great structure, with a waist only about 29 inches. When we started, he had a 44-inch chest. At the end, his chest was almost 50 inches. And his arms went from 16 ½ inches to 18 inches. He was bigger, harder and much more muscular. Wait until you see him in the movie. He's going to shock a lot of people by how good he looks."

Stallone's measurements when he was filming Rambo II were: chest around 50", 29 ½ " waist, and 17 inch biceps. His body fat runs 4 ½ %, although when he's not filming it's 6 %.

Title: Re: natural?
Post by: Van_Bilderass on May 22, 2009, 06:38:57 PM
When Stallone first came to Franco to begin training, he was 170 pounds and very well defined. But he didn't feel he was big enough and wanted to put on 10 pounds of muscle in six weeks. Franco knew how hard Stallone was capable of training, so he decided that was a feasible goal.
"Sylvester gained just about 10 pounds in six and a half weeks," Franco says.


I don't think that's correct. He said he was 150lbs for Rambo III and he was smaller in Rambo II.
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: Boost on May 22, 2009, 06:44:59 PM
Stallone is all of 5"7 in lifts.

17 inch guns in Rambo 2?

No chance

he weighs a buck 50.

Zero legs
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: Montague on May 22, 2009, 06:47:13 PM
I don't think that's correct. He said he was 150lbs for Rambo III and he was smaller in Rambo II.

Wouldn’t surprise me.
There’s a 1-inch discrepancy about his arm measurement in two back-to-back paragraphs from his own site.
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: tony b on May 22, 2009, 07:15:15 PM
This fucker has not a single vein on his body in real life. ::)

(http://images.celeb9.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/hugh_jackman.jpg)

He said he dieted with advice of a bodybuilder - having egg whites for breakfast etc. I think also before he became famous was a personal trainer?

Plus all he would have to do to look like that in the photo is hold something very heavy - eg dumbells or sand bags or something, and they they would just shop them out.


Title: Re: natural?
Post by: Bast175 on May 25, 2009, 01:25:07 AM
Stallone is all of 5"7 in lifts.

17 inch guns in Rambo 2?

No chance

he weighs a buck 50.

Zero legs

he's not that short.  Al Pacino, he's short.
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: DK II on May 25, 2009, 01:30:58 AM
LMAO @ you guys...

He's 41, has been working out for more than 20 years, now he comes in a bit cut at about 80kg and you scream Steroids!!

Pathetic.
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: Bast175 on May 25, 2009, 01:34:20 AM
LMAO @ you guys...

He's 41, has been working out for more than 20 years, now he comes in a bit cut at about 80kg and you scream Steroids!!

Pathetic.

he's 6' 3" you dipshit.
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: DK II on May 25, 2009, 02:01:07 AM
he's 6' 3" you dipshit.

Yes and being about 170lbs at 6'3" after 20 years of training is only possible with Steroids....  ::) ::)


idiots.
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: Bast175 on May 25, 2009, 02:02:17 AM
Yes and being about 170lbs at 6'3" after 20 years of training is only possible with Steroids....  ::) ::)


idiots.

that would be true if you hadn't pulled the 170lbs weight OUT OF YOUR ASS.
Title: Re: picture of ron avidan's penis.
Post by: UPINTHEMGUTS on May 28, 2009, 04:27:08 PM
(http://www.undershirtguy.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/hugh-jackman-wearing-zimmerli-richelieu-ribbed-tank-1.jpg)

Good amount of muscle he's carrying considering that he's 6' 4"
Title: Re: natural?
Post by: DK II on May 29, 2009, 01:03:37 AM
that would be true if you hadn't pulled the 170lbs weight OUT OF YOUR ASS.

Well, better than pulling idiotic threads out of your ass while you're high on paint thinner and meth.