Fvcking democrats... can't keep it in their pants.
Fvcking democrats... can't keep it in their pants.
He's a Republican.
Abstinence Only Fails Again
Plenty of Dem's in State/Federal politics fuck up.The difference being that democrats don't typically run on some sanctimonious notion of "family values." When you do and you are exposed as an adulterous schmuck, you look that much more like a clown.
They just never seem to have the proper "D" affixed to their name when it's shown on the "News"
The difference being that democrats don't typically run on some sanctimonious notion of "family values." When you do and you are exposed as an adulterous schmuck, you look that much more like a clown.
Way to completely and utterly miss the point of my post.Make clarity your friend and enlighten me as to the "point of your post."
FLASHBACK: Ensign Called On Clinton To Resign After Admitting Affair — ‘He Has No Credibility Left’
In 1998, while running for the Nevada’s senate seat against Harry Reid, Ensign called on President Clinton to resign in light of his admitted affair with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky.
The difference being that democrats don't typically run on some sanctimonious notion of "family values." When you do and you are exposed as an adulterous schmuck, you look that much more like a clown.
Typical Republican getting caught in the bear trap of HYPOCRISY that they are completely unable to see until the nation is laughing at them.
More proof politicians are just like any walk of life.......
But even more proof that some people actually fall for reps vs. dems regarding extramarital affairs.
Will he resign? Of course not, he's a hypocrite.
In other words, Democrats are expected to be hoes.If both parties have "hoes" as you put it, I'll take the one that isn't filled with hypocrites. ;D
;D
This coming from the party that gave us the biggest whoremonger to ever hit Washington. ::)Whomever you are referencing no doubt did not run for president on "family values."
At worst, it puts him in the same category of Bill "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" Clinton and John Edwards.And at best it makes him a HYPOCRITE. :P
Or, on a non-sexual note, we have the likes of Joe "Gaffes 'R Us" Biden and "Turbo Tax Timmy" Geitner.What do these individuals have to do with Ensign being a HYPOCRITE?
If both parties have "hoes" as you put it, I'll take the one that isn't filled with hypocrites. ;D
Whomever you are referencing no doubt did not run for president on "family values."
And at best it makes him a HYPOCRITE. :P
What do these individuals have to do with Ensign being a HYPOCRITE?
Ensign has been a member of the Promises Keepers, a male evangelical organization that promotes marital fidelity.
classic
::)
Yawn. But I do like the fact you're trying to be funny. Good progress. :)
It's actually pretty sad. He's a class A hypocrite. We should all expect much more from our elected officials, especially those who were on the impeach Clinton bandwagon for the same conduct.
Shocking.
I just can't figure out why "Abstinence Only" failed for this guy.
let's look at all the reasons why it should have worked:
1. He's a mature adult and presumably should have more life experience, maturity, self control etc.. than a horny teenager
2. If he really wanted sex he could always do the wife for the 10,000th time
3. He faced public disgrace,humiliation and being branded a hypocrite if he got caught
In spite of all that he just couldn't help himself.
Abstince Only = Just Say No
They are both abject failures for which we've spent hundreds of millions of tax dollars
FOX NEWS:
Bristol Palin Says Abstinence 'Not Realistic at All'
ANCHORAGE, Alaska Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's 18-year-old daughter, an unwed mother, says teenagers should avoid having sex.
However, Bristol Palin acknowledges that abstinence is "not realistic at all." She commented during a two-part interview recorded for FOX News Channel.
Just days after the governor was named John McCain's running mate on the Republican presidential ticket last year, she announced her daughter was pregnant. Bristol Palin gave birth Dec. 27 to a boy named Tripp.
You do realise that Bristol Palin has changed her tune, since then.
Proof is in the pudding. Her actions - having a baby - say she believes it's unrealistic.
Her words - "abstinence is not realistic at all" - say she belives it's unrealistic.
Her tv appearance for some abstinence organization for her mom after the world mocked her for her FOX news appearance - damage control.
That's not damage control. That's called hindsight being 20/20 (or learning the hard way). Per her ex-boyfriend's words, they did use condoms. Well, apparently, there was a least one time they didn't.
Her actions show one thing: Had she abstained, she wouldn't have a baby, now.
If you don't want babies, you don't engage in the baby-making process (i.e. sexual intercourse). Some folks can't seem to get that simple concept through their skulls.
This is downright silly. This issue with Ensign is about ADULTERY, not abstinence.
Notwithstanding that, abstinence is hardly a case of "Just Say No".
That's not damage control. That's called hindsight being 20/20 (or learning the hard way). Per her ex-boyfriend's words, they did use condoms. Well, apparently, there was a least one time they didn't.According to Levi, there were a FEW times when they didn't use condoms. Little Bristol was spreading her legs for the school jock quite often, it appears. :D
Her actions show one thing: Had she abstained, she wouldn't have a baby, now.
If you don't want babies, you don't engage in the baby-making process (i.e. sexual intercourse). Some folks can't seem to get that simple concept through their skulls.
are you kidding me?
adultery is completely preventable by abstinence
it works every time
abstinence does = just say no
you do see that,...right.......?
Who cares if this guy,or Bill Clinton or anyone else has an affair?Why in the world does that matter to ANYONE but their families?I couldnt care less if Bill Clinton got 500 head jobs on the floor of the white House.I dont care if this guy was banging chicks in the ass in his office.Once again,the pussification of America.Everyone sticking their god dam noses in everyones buisiness.Im MUCH more concerned that these fools are flushing my money down the toilet then Iam if they are banging chicks.Then "BILLY MINIMUM" should tell his GOP heroes to shut the fuck up when they get all self righteous the minute a democrat is embroiled in a sex scandal. Write your repube congressmen a letter (using spell check!) to let them know that you don't want them wasting time on trying to be the family values party when they have plenty of sleazebags within.
are you kidding me?
adultery is completely preventable by abstinence
it works every time
abstinence does = just say no
you do see that,...right.......?
According to Levi, there were a FEW times when they didn't use condoms. Little Bristol was spreading her legs for the school jock quite often, it appears. :D
I think we all realize that abstinence is the best way to avoid an unwanted pregnancy. It's just laughable coming from Bristol's horny ass. I living proof that once you start humpin' you don't stop. ;D Neither will Bristol. She's another GOP HYPOCRITE, pushing her mom's GOP "family values" agenda.
Then "BILLY MINIMUM" should tell his GOP heroes to shut the fuck up when they get all self righteous the minute a democrat is embroiled in a sex scandal. Write your repube congressmen a letter (using spell check!) to let them know that you don't want them wasting time on trying to be the family values party when they have plenty of sleazebags within.
Each party gets "self-righteous" when it catches a member of the opposition doing dirt. That's the name of the game. When Edwards and Spitzer were whoring around, the GOP got on them. With Foley and now Ensign creeping, it's the Dems' turn on the high horse.Once again, you
Then "BILLY MINIMUM" should tell his GOP heroes to shut the fuck up when they get all self righteous the minute a democrat is embroiled in a sex scandal. Write your repube congressmen a letter (using spell check!) to let them know that you don't want them wasting time on trying to be the family values party when they have plenty of sleazebags within.
Yes your right.The left NEVER does that.Do you happen to recall the senator from Oregon who they ran out of office?Do you remember what the left did to Trent Lott?PLEASE,both parties do the exact same shit.Pelosi talks about ethics and is a god dam criminal as does Reid with his sweethart deals and Dodd with his self rightous self getting more deals.The idea that its only on one side is silly.Didnt Barney Frank just recently call Scalia a homophobe?A guy that had a prostitution ring running out of his house.They all are shit.The democrats don't run on a platform of family values,"BILLY." :-*
I dunno. I don't think she suddenly realized this at age 18. I think she still feels the same way.
I just think her newfound activism was the result of Palin wanting to rekindle love from the far-right who was disappointed in her parenting, and saw Bristol on FOX saying something they'd never want their own kids to hear (it's okay to have sex, it's realistic).
you're welcome to your opinion, which means about as much as mine, nada.
The democrats don't run on a platform of family values,"BILLY." :-*
Earth to Straw Man, abstinence means not having sex AT ALL!!
John Edwards represents a long history of the democrats running on a platform of "family values?" Give me a break.
Oh really? Does the name JOHN EDWARDS ring a bell?
Your implication that Democrats deserve less scrutiny or criticism for whoring around, just because they "don't run on a platform of family values" (which is utterly false, in many cases) rings quite hollow.
John Edwards represents a long history of the democrats running on a platform of "family values?" Give me a break.
Your use of the term "implication" is pejorative and indicates your attempt to skew the discussion because of your weak premise. At no time did I state that democrats do not deserve criticism for adultery, rather that when it does happen, it does not reveal them to be from a party of HYPOCRITES. ;)
Do you support hypocrites in your personal life as well as your politics? :-\
The democrats don't run on a platform of family values,"BILLY." :-*The GOP is full of HYPOCRITES.
No they run on diversity which means BLAME WHITES FOR EVERYTHING and give loans to pieces of shit who cant pay them back all in the NAME OF FAIRNESS AND DIVERSITY ,then play innocent as to why the hosing market falls.Then pass hate crimes legislation but somehow NEVER charge blacks with hate crimes,never mind 30,000 black on white rapes a year as compared to ZERO white on black.They want inclusion but promote the congressional black congress and press for seperation everyday.THEY ARE THE BIGGEST HYPOCRITES OF ALL!!!!!They are a party that kills Trent Lott,but allows Al Sharpton to run for president and speak at their conventions.They cry about racism but allow Jesse Jackson to speak at their conventions and let Alcie Hastings be a part of the party.Talk about hpocrites they are the biggest on earth!!!::)
Apparently, you missed my most recent edit. So, let me spell it out AGAIN!!! How many times have we heard about how much of a devoted husband and father Barack Obama is? Far too many times to count.
In fact, in CHURCH on Fathers’ Day last year, he gave a speech, emphasizing the importance of men stepping to the plate to take care of their families. This was the same message after which Jesse Jackson claimed he wanted to chop Obama’s nuts off (the old "hot mike" routine).
If, God forbid, Obama were to pull a Clinton and start screwing around on his wife, you can bet your bottom dollar the GOP would bring up this Fathers' Day speech, among other things (and the Dems would downplay it, to the fullest, as you are doing).
Speaking of Jesse Jackson, he and Al Sharpton are long-entrenched in the Democratic Party, as are a number of other ministers. The "family values" thing is a given with them.
So, your silly idea that Democrats DO NOT run on family values is utter ridiculous.
::)
Despite your hatred of Black people, they are not the source of your troubles. You mention Al Sharpton in every other post, yet I'd hazard a guess that he has very little relevance to your day-to-day life. I don't think Sharpton or Jackson are especially relevant to anyone's lives, other than offering opinions to add to the political and social discourse, as they have a right to do.
Focus on getting a job, backing off the steroids, and self-improvement.
The definition of hypocrisy is lost on hyprocrites.
Talking about Obama being a good father is just a speech. Passing laws, leading crusades, and attempting to push your "values" on everyone else in the country is something else. Especially when you get caught for the exact same thing you are railing against and crucifying others for.
Republicans are hypocrites of the worst kind.
Joe Biden is THE BIGGEST anti-drug guy in the history of the senate,yet his daughter is a coke head.
Coke? Ummmm sounds like my kinda whore. ;D
The democrats don't run on a platform of family values,"BILLY." :-*The GOP is full of HYPOCRITES.
Excellent example of hyporcrisy from the board hypocrite themselves. Keep us entertained. But please, keep the 3 page novels to a minimum and we might read your drivel.
No need to take back FACTS young lady. Try again when you have something else to pass off as comments.
You have no idea what hypocrisy truly is. Typical Republican.
The democrats don't run on a platform of family values,"BILLY." :-*
Bringing up DOMA and Dems in the topic of hypocrisy is useless. Unless of course after voting for DOMA some of the Dems got caught in illegal gay marriages. But that didn't happen did it? Your point = irrelevant. But we already know that.
Webster is your friend.
While you are at it, you can learn the difference between political views and personal views and how hypocrisy reigns supreme over Republicans in that area as well.
Of course, I don't really expect you to be smart enough to comprehend any of this basic logic. So spout your useless 3 page reply that does nothing but clarify what we already know. You're an idiot.
Just like I said about the 3 page post of nonsense.
They do have meds to help with delusions like these. You could ask the doc for double the dose.
There are a few Democrats who are bullshitting "family value" clowns as well.Why does Eurotrash think I care about his views? ??? Tipper Gore? lol It is obvious "Zach" doesn't know what he's talking about. ::)
Tipper Gore was one of the leading ladies behind the idiotic labeling of records that got introduced back in the 80's.
Talk about fascist anti-free speech, Reaganist way of acting.
Then the internet came and set the freedom of speech free again, temporarily, but Fascists around the world are trying to restrict it again, trying to control us once again. >:(
BTW,
on the issue of internet rights I think Obama seems to be pretty decent, Hillary I really don't know, but I get the feeling she's much more conservative.
There are plenty of Republicans that seems to be in support of the individual right, and quite frankly, both the big US parties have ideologies that should be big on the individuals side.
Especially the GOP.
So I think filesharing could become a big issue for the GOP, if they have the smarts to pick it up.
They certainly have the ideological base to do it - nobody should care what you or anyone else do with your computer, and companies should not be allowed to track your actions.
Like they do in France.
I'm sure Fox News could do a great piece on the french angle, they're great on whipping up hate against everything French. 8)
Of course, I don't really expect you to be smart enough to comprehend any of this basic logic. So spout your useless 3 page reply that does nothing but clarify what we already know. You're an idiot.This pretty much sums it up!
This pretty much sums it up!
"McMoron" will turn this into a thirty page thread with his inane babble and determination to have the last word. Let him. His passionate support of HYPOCRITES speaks for itself.
Seriously, I have never seen someone post such drivel. It is beyond pathetic to watch someone attempt to draw a relevant conclusion based on an irrelevant assumption. You sit there the entire time knowing it is going to fail and yet they plod on and on and... on. Completely unaware of the dazzling display of stupidity they are exhibiting. The really moronic thing is they can't even grasp simple logic in a two sentence post of someone else without twisting it (or completely unable to comprehend it) before attempting a little mini novel on their viewpoint.You're a smart guy. At least as it relates to this thread, the responses thus far are not worth your time.
both parties have their deviants.
I think the prob here is that this dude (and many repubs) try to take the moral high ground and preach on others (and legislate) how your marriage should go.
The higher they place themselves up, the further the fall. When a single dem governor gets caught with a hooker, nobody cares. When a married repub governor on many religious committees who spends his days lecturing others on respecting their vows and demanding cheaters resign... when HE is caught boning a hooker, it's a bigger deal.
When a single dem governor gets caught with a hooker, nobody cares. When a married repub governor on many religious committees who spends his days lecturing others on respecting their vows and demanding cheaters resign... when HE is caught boning a hooker, it's a bigger deal.
Oh but I do get it. I make a plain English statement of an action (hypocrisy and scandals) for a specific time frame (SINCE 2006) and you dispute it. Well alright then! ::)
But yet when I then clarify the statement again (and again.. and again...) and post proof, your only FAILING action is to attempt to twist the context around (again). Typical deflection. Typical FAILING deflection. ::)
What I said is true. Since 2006, GOP has the vast majority of scandals. And yet you can't counter that so the only option you got left is typical (FAILING) backtracking in a (FAILING) effort to try to redirect the topic and issue from a very specific statement of mine that you disputed. ::)
I get it. You'll get it to whether you want to or not. ::) Bottom line is : As I stated, GOP has been the vast majority of scandals and hypocrisy since 2006. Prove it wrong. ::) Otherwise continue with the irrelevant replies that only showcase you can't dispute it with facts, only words. ::)
And yes, these ::) are a direct prediction of your future posts. ::)
Like Governor Spitzer prosecuting people for prostitution and later engaging in the same conduct himself?
lol . . . Meltdown. ::)
EXACTLY!!! (Oh boy, there is hope yet. ::) )
Now for every one of the Dems that was busted in straight hypocrisy like that, how many Repubs are there?
Plenty on both sides. Like I just said:
Like Governor Spitzer prosecuting people for prostitution and later engaging in the same conduct himself?
Every politician, particularly those in the Congress and local and state executive positions, include honesty and integrity as a major component of their platform when they run for office. When they fall, they are hypocrites, regardless of party.
But that is not what I said. I was very specific in my words and you disputed them. But yet, no proof exists. At least, none you have provided for your side. Making a vague blanket statement isn't contention to what I posted.
Again, bottom line is - Republicans are more guilty of hypocrisy since 2006 than Dems.
You went from "hypocrisy" to just plain "crimes" in your little list.
So I beat you at your own game. If you want to just include hypocrites, well nevertheless I will win that as well. The facts and stats speak for themselves. Someone pushing stronger pedophile legislation and getting busted in it... hypocrite. Someone preaching and condemning homos and drug users and getting caught with a queer dopedealer..hypocrite. Prostitution laws and busted with a hooker... hypocrite. Someone high on the horse with anti-gay legislation or going after adulters and then getting busted for the same... hypocrite.
Someone getting busted for embezzling money...
Someone getting busted for perjury....
Someone getting busted for fraud..
well those are just dumbasses. Criminals. You can easily commit a crime without being a hypocrite about it.
You didn't provide any facts. You also have a very narrow and inaccurate definition of "hypocrisy."this is the part lurker youre having problems with, your trying to further define hypocrisey so that you can eliminate the left...
But I'll play a little. Let's work with your definition. Where are the "facts" showing each person you claim to be a hypocrite didn't practice what they preached? In other words, how many of the Republicans you call hypocrites made public statements, campaigned, etc. about being faithful to their wives, but later cheated on them?
(insert Jeopardy music here)
As I said earlier, twice, anytime certain public office holders commit crimes or indiscretions they are hypocrites, because honesty, integrity, etc. are part of their platforms when they run for office.
this is the part lurker youre having problems with, your trying to further define hypocrisey so that you can eliminate the left...
politicians run on being upstanding and ethical ppl ALL POLITICIANS...you dont see politicians running on platforms of "im gonna fuck you over the first chance i get"
LOL im sure if you look at the voting records of these ppl left and right you will see that at one point or another they voted for something that whatever their actions went against...
dont be an ignorant hard line party fool...
Once again, someone can't post anything to back their own argument up. ::)
Spin, deflect, split hairs, whatever... still remains the same as I stated it pages ago.
Now, I will continue to await you to post FACTS that dispute my claim, not just words.
Once again, someone can't post anything to back their own argument up. ::)LOL your the one splitting hairs...
Spin, deflect, split hairs, whatever... still remains the same as I stated it pages ago.
this is the part lurker youre having problems with, your trying to further define hypocrisey so that you can eliminate the left...
This pretty much sums it up!
"McMoron" will turn this into a thirty page thread with his inane babble and determination to have the last word. Let him. His passionate support of HYPOCRITES speaks for itself.
LOL your the one splitting hairs...
lol. Cut and run.
Not.
I stated plain as day GOP had more scandals and hypocrisy since 2006.
Now you can either prove me wrong with facts or just type nonsense. Which is it?
I prefer "cluck and duck"
;D
In other words, "Tomorrow they're gonna show the exact link of how I tried to pay taxpayer dollars$ to my whore's family to keep the affair quiet".
Typical democrat right there.