Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: The True Adonis on July 12, 2009, 10:38:52 AM
-
Which is more chemically fueled? Discuss.
-
Which is more chemically fueled? Discuss.
BBing for sure, strongmen don't need all that "cutting" shit.
-
top bodybuilder...........ea sily ;)
-
Naturals can get reasonably clos to juiced lifters strength (raw) but nowhere near the size.
BBers I'd say
I know a drug free raw lifter who bench presses 550lbs (or there abouts) in comp - 'only' 150lbs behind geared lifters
However the biggest natties in world look tiny beside even average geared bbuillders.
It leads me to thinking that drugs are better more potent for size rather than strength
-
I know amateur strongmen who have taken 8+ anadrol per day
But many come off between competitions
All in all top bodybuilders would use more different substances and use more continuously
-
Strongmen don't need diuretics or all the drugs for cutting down to 4% bodyfat and ripped glutes.
-
Yes, it has to go to bodybuilding. Most of the stacks I've seen ran a gram(1000mg) to 2 grams of various things among known powerlifters. Strongman would be similar in use I figure.
-
bodybuilders = way more gear
-
Olympic lifters in the 1960's-1970's used only slightly more than HRT doses. My biology teacher before class would go to the water fountain to take his hit of Dbol.
-
Bodybuilder's take more. It's not even close.
-
Bodybuilding for sure.
Strongmen take just the basics - testosterone, Anadrol/dbol/Winstrol etc, maybe some take HGH if they can get it.
-
Bodybuilding requires more..
-
(http://www.itrening.pl/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/mariusz-pudzianowski.jpg)
-
Bodybuilders
-
Pudzianowski or Tyson?
-
obviously the bodybuilder
because the strongman uses AAS, painkillers & HGH right???
the bodybuilder uses AAS, HGH, insulin, diuretics, fatburners (t3, clen, dnp etc)
-
Naturals can get reasonably clos to juiced lifters strength (raw) but nowhere near the size.
I know a drug free raw lifter who bench presses 550lbs (or there abouts) in comp - 'only' 150lbs behind geared lifters
However the biggest natties in world look tiny beside even average geared bbuillders.
It leads me to thinking that drugs are better more potent for size rather than strength
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D
you are fucking delusional...honestly
-
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D
you are fucking delusional...honestly
Why is he?
-
Why is he?
just read what he wrote
" natties can attain the same strength as juicers
oh brother
that's why powerlifters OD on halo, drol test etc etc
-
andy bolton is natural :D
-
TOP strong men for sure.
On a swedish forum there was this swedish strongman that was on aboyt 4-5g EW and went to russia and train ans he was SHOCKED how much shit they took.
And thats coming from a gut thats on 5g ew lol.
Russians were Nuts with the orals etc, didnt give a fuck about their liver and so on
-
TOP strong men for sure.
what do you base that on?
-
TOP strong men for sure.
On a swedish forum there was this swedish strongman that was on aboyt 4-5g EW and went to russia and train ans he was SHOCKED how much shit they took.
And thats coming from a gut thats on 5g ew lol.
Russians were Nuts with the orals etc, didnt give a fuck about their liver and so on
Bingo!
-
just read what he wrote
" natties can attain the same strength as juicers
oh brother
that's why powerlifters OD on halo, drol test etc etc
I can agree with what your saying. But I think he was getting at measurement of success between the two. An "enhanced" regional champion PL and natural regional champ PL's numbers would be more closer than say physiques a Trey Brewer NPC BB and a "Pete McDugan"(Fake name) devoted 15 year southeast "natural" BB champion.
Sorry about the delayed response, Im on the job while posting :P
-
Strongmen probably use more Testosterone but Bodybuilders use diuretics etc. so the most lethal combination is taken by bodybuilders.
-
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D
you are fucking delusional...honestly
The difference in strength between top nattie PLers and top druged strongmen is less than the difference in size of top nattie bbuilders and top drugged bbuilders.
-
The difference in strength between top nattie PLers and top druged strongmen is less than the difference in size of top nattie bbuilders and top drugged bbuilders.
duh .. aaaa not
-
WR raw drug free bench is like what 550-600lbs
geared its a little over 700?
Top nattyat 5'10 is what 195lbs?
Top geared bbuilders at 5'10 is 280+
-
Over the years, they've posted the numbers on heavly tested versus non-tested meets with top lifters, the drugs tended to add about 30% to a total, give or take.
-
Thanks for that BB
Would you say that the difference in muscle between natties and geard bbuilders is more than 30%
-
WR raw drug free bench is like what 550-600lbs
geared its a little over 700?
Top nattyat 5'10 is what 195lbs?
Top geared bbuilders at 5'10 is 280+
::)
::)
-
WR raw drug free bench is like what 550-600lbs
geared its a little over 700?
Top nattyat 5'10 is what 195lbs?
Top geared bbuilders at 5'10 is 280+
How do you know which lifts are drug free? The strictest drug tested fed is the IPF and they have a serious drug problem, especially in some countries.
-
andy bolton is natural :D
I'd love to see Bolton's stack. He has that Brian Batcheldor coaching him. Dude is a real drug guru.
-
Thanks for that BB
Would you say that the difference in muscle between natties and geard bbuilders is more than 30%
Gosh, I'm too lazy to figure it out, but a decent geared user who runs a lot of stuff, tends to be 50-70lbs heavier than a decent natural of similar frame size, condition, etc.......
-
::)
::)
Okay. Now take the bench shirts out of the equation and you'll see what we're getting at.
-
::)
::)
Notice I said 'raw' you fool
-
Imagine Pudz in UFC! He is a good fighter already, reckon he'd be badass at take-downs and stuff, would be great to get him vs Brock Lesnar.