Author Topic: Which Requires More Drugs, Top IFBB Bodybuilder or Top World`s Strongest Man? (Read 3649 times)

The True Adonis · « **on:** July 12, 2009, 10:38:52 AM »

Which is more chemically fueled? Discuss.

chaos · « **Reply #1 on:** July 12, 2009, 10:46:08 AM »

Quote from: The True Adonis on July 12, 2009, 10:38:52 AM

Which is more chemically fueled? Discuss.

BBing for sure, strongmen don't need all that "cutting" shit.

Wiggs · « **Reply #2 on:** July 12, 2009, 10:46:35 AM »

top bodybuilder...........ea sily

Ursus · « **Reply #3 on:** July 12, 2009, 10:55:29 AM »

Naturals can get reasonably clos to juiced lifters strength (raw) but nowhere near the size.

BBers I'd say

I know a drug free raw lifter who bench presses 550lbs (or there abouts) in comp - 'only' 150lbs behind geared lifters

However the biggest natties in world look tiny beside even average geared bbuillders.

It leads me to thinking that drugs are better more potent for size rather than strength

The Wizard of Truth · « **Reply #4 on:** July 12, 2009, 10:58:08 AM »

I know amateur strongmen who have taken 8+ anadrol per day
But many come off between competitions
All in all top bodybuilders would use more different substances and use more continuously

Sir Humphrey · « **Reply #5 on:** July 12, 2009, 10:59:33 AM »

Strongmen don't need diuretics or all the drugs for cutting down to 4% bodyfat and ripped glutes.

BB · « **Reply #6 on:** July 12, 2009, 05:09:38 PM »

Yes, it has to go to bodybuilding. Most of the stacks I've seen ran a gram(1000mg) to 2 grams of various things among known powerlifters. Strongman would be similar in use I figure.

lift 456 · « **Reply #7 on:** July 12, 2009, 06:50:02 PM »

bodybuilders = way more gear

sync pulse · « **Reply #8 on:** July 12, 2009, 07:03:34 PM »

Olympic lifters in the 1960's-1970's used only slightly more than HRT doses. My biology teacher before class would go to the water fountain to take his hit of Dbol.

tommywishbone · « **Reply #9 on:** July 12, 2009, 07:29:05 PM »

Bodybuilder's take more. It's not even close.

gib · « **Reply #10 on:** July 12, 2009, 07:35:54 PM »

Bodybuilding for sure.

Strongmen take just the basics - testosterone, Anadrol/dbol/Winstrol etc, maybe some take HGH if they can get it.

nicky.smth · « **Reply #11 on:** July 12, 2009, 07:47:31 PM »

Bodybuilding requires more..

Spike · « **Reply #12 on:** July 12, 2009, 08:24:04 PM »

BFP · « **Reply #13 on:** July 12, 2009, 09:15:14 PM »

Bodybuilders

Matt C · « **Reply #14 on:** July 13, 2009, 01:48:26 AM »

Pudzianowski or Tyson?

io856 · « **Reply #15 on:** July 13, 2009, 01:56:01 AM »

obviously the bodybuilder

because the strongman uses AAS, painkillers & HGH right???

the bodybuilder uses AAS, HGH, insulin, diuretics, fatburners (t3, clen, dnp etc)

Cleanest Natural · « **Reply #16 on:** July 13, 2009, 03:45:07 AM »

Quote from: Ursus on July 12, 2009, 10:55:29 AM

Naturals can get reasonably clos to juiced lifters strength (raw) but nowhere near the size.

I know a drug free raw lifter who bench presses 550lbs (or there abouts) in comp - 'only' 150lbs behind geared lifters

However the biggest natties in world look tiny beside even average geared bbuillders.

It leads me to thinking that drugs are better more potent for size rather than strength

you are fucking delusional...honestly

Trapper_Slapper · « **Reply #17 on:** July 13, 2009, 03:59:30 AM »

Quote from: sevastase on July 13, 2009, 03:45:07 AM

you are fucking delusional...honestly

Why is he?

Cleanest Natural · « **Reply #18 on:** July 13, 2009, 04:03:00 AM »

Quote from: Trapper_Slapper on July 13, 2009, 03:59:30 AM

Why is he?

just read what he wrote

" natties can attain the same strength as juicers

oh brother

that's why powerlifters OD on halo, drol test etc etc

io856 · « **Reply #19 on:** July 13, 2009, 04:17:44 AM »

andy bolton is natural

spinnis · « **Reply #20 on:** July 13, 2009, 04:23:09 AM »

TOP strong men for sure.

On a swedish forum there was this swedish strongman that was on aboyt 4-5g EW and went to russia and train ans he was SHOCKED how much shit they took.
And thats coming from a gut thats on 5g ew lol.

Russians were Nuts with the orals etc, didnt give a fuck about their liver and so on

io856 · « **Reply #21 on:** July 13, 2009, 04:24:54 AM »

Quote from: Swede! on July 13, 2009, 04:23:09 AM

TOP strong men for sure.

what do you base that on?

The Master · « **Reply #22 on:** July 13, 2009, 04:29:13 AM »

Quote from: Swede! on July 13, 2009, 04:23:09 AM

TOP strong men for sure.

On a swedish forum there was this swedish strongman that was on aboyt 4-5g EW and went to russia and train ans he was SHOCKED how much shit they took.
And thats coming from a gut thats on 5g ew lol.

Russians were Nuts with the orals etc, didnt give a fuck about their liver and so on

Bingo!

Trapper_Slapper · « **Reply #23 on:** July 13, 2009, 04:30:44 AM »

Quote from: sevastase on July 13, 2009, 04:03:00 AM

just read what he wrote

" natties can attain the same strength as juicers

oh brother

that's why powerlifters OD on halo, drol test etc etc

I can agree with what your saying. But I think he was getting at measurement of success between the two. An "enhanced" regional champion PL and natural regional champ PL's numbers would be more closer than say physiques a ~~Trey Brewer~~ NPC BB and a "Pete McDugan"(Fake name) devoted 15 year southeast "natural" BB champion.

Sorry about the delayed response, Im on the job while posting

Method101 · « **Reply #24 on:** July 13, 2009, 04:34:29 AM »

Strongmen probably use more Testosterone but Bodybuilders use diuretics etc. so the most lethal combination is taken by bodybuilders.

Author Topic: Which Requires More Drugs, Top IFBB Bodybuilder or Top World`s Strongest Man? (Read 3649 times)

io856

io856

spinnis

io856