Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Soul Crusher on July 13, 2009, 04:26:24 AM
-
Chills of Global Cooling
Korea Times Via Scripps Howard News Service ^ | July 12, 2009 | Deroy Murdock
Posted on Monday, July 13, 2009 7:18:37 AM by NRG1973
As cap-and-trade advocates tie their knickers in knots over so-called ``global warming," Mother Nature refuses to cooperate. Earth's temperatures continue a chill that began 11 years ago. As global cooling accelerates, global-warmists kick, scream, and push their pet theory ― just like little kids who cover their ears and stomp their feet when older children tell them not to bother waiting up for Santa Claus on Christmas Eve.
Consider how the globe cooled last month:
― June in Manhattan averaged 67.5 degrees Fahrenheit, 3.7 degrees below normal _ the coldest average since 1958. The National Weather Service stated July 1: ``The last time that Central Park hit 85 in May... but not in June was back in 1903."
― In Phoenix, June's high temperatures were below 100 degrees for 15 days straight, the first such June since 1913. In California's desert, Yucca Valley's June average was 83.5, 8.5 degrees below normal. Downtown Los Angeles averaged 74.5 degrees, five below normal.
― Boston saw temperatures 4.7 degrees below normal. ``This is the second coldest average high temp since 1872," veteran meteorologist and Weather Channel alumnus Joseph D'Aleo reports at Icecap.com. ``It has been so cool and so cloudy that trees in northern New England are starting to show colors that normally first appear in September." Looking abroad, D'Aleo noted: ``Southern Brazil had one of the coldest Junes in decades, and New Zealand has had unusual cold and snow again this year."
― New Zealand's National Climate Center issued a June 2 press release headlined, ``TEMPERATURE: LOWEST EVER FOR MAY FOR MANY AREAS, COLDER THAN NORMAL FOR ALL."
― South African officials say cold weather killed two vagrants in the Eastern Cape. Both slept outdoors June 26 and froze to death.
Simmer down, global-warmists retort. These are mere anecdotes, hand-picked to make them look silly.
Well, one would be foolish to challenge space-born satellites that gauge Earth's mean temperatures ― cold, hot, and average. Here again, evidence of global cooling accumulates like snow drifts.
``There has been no significant global warming since 1995, no warming since 1998, and global cooling for the past few years," former U.S. Senate Environment Committee spokesman Marc Morano writes at ClimateDepot.com. Citing metrics gathered by University of Alabama, Huntsville's Dr. Roy Spencer, Morano adds: ``The latest global averaged satellite temperature data for June 2009 reveal yet another drop in Earth's temperature ... Despite his dire warnings, the Earth has cooled 0.74 degrees F since former Vice President Al Gore released 'An Inconvenient Truth' in 2006."
Earth's temperatures fall even as the planet spins within what global-warmists consider a thickening cloud of toxic carbon dioxide.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Earth System Research Laboratory at Mauna Loa, Hawaii consistently and reliably has measured CO2 for the last 50 years. CO2 concentrations have risen steadily for a half-century.
For December 1958, the Laboratory reported an atmospheric CO2 concentration of 314.67 parts per million (PPM). Flash forward to December 1998, about when global cooling reappeared. CO2 already had increased to 366.87 PPM. By December 2008, CO2 had advanced to 385.54 PPM, a significant 5.088 percent growth in one decade.
This capsizes the carbon-phobic global-warmist argument. For Earth's temperatures to sink while CO2 rises contradicts global warming as thoroughly as learning that firefighters can battle blazes by spraying them with gasoline.
So, to defeat so-called ``global warming," there is no need for the $864 billion Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill, the Kyoto Protocols, elaborate new regulations, or United Nations guidelines. Instead, let the cold times roll.
It is one thing to have a national debate about a serious problem, with adults differing over which solution might work best. Reasonable people, for instance, can dispute whether growing federal involvement would heal or inflame our healthcare system's serious maladies.
But as so-called ``global warming" proves fictional, those who would shackle the economy with taxes and regulations to fight mythology increasingly resemble deinstitutionalized derelicts on an urban street corner, wildly swatting at their own imaginary monsters.
+_____________________________________________
A little truuth from Al Gore would be appreciated.
-
Your article is so full of holes with ZERO context.
You are having a meltdown.
-
Your article is so full of holes with ZERO context.
You are having a meltdown.
Not really, who is having the meltdown are the climate cultists such as yourself who have tried to scare everyone into believing lies that are simply not true.
And the list of experts who claim global warming is no true is growing by the day!
-
Not really, who is having the meltdown are the climate cultists such as yourself who have tried to scare everyone into believing lies that are simply not true.
And the list of experts who claim global warming is no true is growing by the day!
"Experts" in my opinion, do not include fundamentalist religious Christians and Muslims with zero Scientific training. These types litter your "list of experts". In fact, your list is a complete joke. I have seen a larger list that think the moon landing is faked or that 9/11 was an inside job. Deferring to these "experts" is just as dumb.
Focus on the Scientific evidence.
With your above drivel you are discounting the following:
National Academy of Sciences (US) Royal Society (United Kingdom) Chinese Academy of Sciences Academia Brasiliera de Ciências (Brazil) Royal Society of Canada Académie des Sciences (france) Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina (Germany) Indian National Science Academy Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei (Italy) Science Council of Japan Russian Academy of Sciences Australian Academy of Sciences Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Sciences and the Arts Caribbean Academy of Sciences Indonesian Academy of Sciences Royal Irish Academy Academy of Sciences Malaysia Academy Council of the Royal Society of New Zealand Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
-
Not really, who is having the meltdown are the climate cultists such as yourself who have tried to scare everyone into believing lies that are simply not true.
And the list of experts who claim global warming is no true is growing by the day!
first time I've ever seen someone reply to an article post with "meltdown" hahahaha, WTFH...
-
first time I've ever seen someone reply to an article post with "meltdown" hahahaha, WTFH...
I posted this article because it is important for people to realize that this cap & trade garbage has nothing to do with global warming, since GW simply is not occuring.
-
I posted this article because it is important for people to realize that this cap & trade garbage has nothing to do with global warming, since GW simply is not occuring.
And liberal scientists secretly buried fossils to test the devout Christians in their faith to Jesus and god.
333366 stick to collecting debts and sports. Science is not your forte what so ever.
-
And liberal scientists secretly buried fossils to test the devout Christians in their faith to Jesus and god.
333366 stick to collecting debts and sports. Science is not your forte what so ever.
No it is not, but that does not mean I cant recognize that many scientists do not agree with the methodology used by global warming supporters and the fact that almost everyone agrees no warming has occurred since 1998.
And BTW - Cap & Trade is simply a give away to Goldman Sachs, Al Gore, and rest of the special interests lobbysits all while taxing people even more.
Even Clair McCaskill said Cap & trade makes us look like fools.
-
"Experts" in my opinion, do not include fundamentalist religious Christians and Muslims with zero Scientific training. These types litter your "list of experts". In fact, your list is a complete joke. I have seen a larger list that think the moon landing is faked or that 9/11 was an inside job. Deferring to these "experts" is just as dumb.
Focus on the Scientific evidence.
With your above drivel you are discounting the following:
National Academy of Sciences (US) Royal Society (United Kingdom) Chinese Academy of Sciences Academia Brasiliera de Ciências (Brazil) Royal Society of Canada Académie des Sciences (france) Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina (Germany) Indian National Science Academy Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei (Italy) Science Council of Japan Russian Academy of Sciences Australian Academy of Sciences Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Sciences and the Arts Caribbean Academy of Sciences Indonesian Academy of Sciences Royal Irish Academy Academy of Sciences Malaysia Academy Council of the Royal Society of New Zealand Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
WTF do you have that list saved in notepad, so you can cut and paste it into every GW thread?
The sky is always falling for people like you, and if you can't find a crisis you create one.
-
They have all come to believe that the "Day After Tomorrow" is going to happen like it did in the movie.
-
They have all come to believe that the "Day After Tomorrow" is going to happen like it did in the movie.
Thats the way you think it will happen.
-
Thats the way you think it will happen.
Here you go TA - If I ever met you this is what i would do.
-
Here you go TA - If I ever met you this is what i would do.
If I ever met you, I would probably take you to a few laboratories where you could have a question an answer session on a wide range of topics so you would leave an enlightened person with facts and evidence.
I am sorry you have not had the benefit of this type of education.
-
If I ever met you, I would probably take you to a few laboratories where you could have a question an answer session on a wide range of topics so you would leave an enlightened person with facts and evidence.
I am sorry you have not had the benefit of this type of education.
Your crack den does not count.
-
Your crack den does not count.
By the way,
Marlon Brando was a HUGE environmentalist.
-
By the way,
Marlon Brando was a HUGE environmentalist.
It looks like he ate everything in his environment in his later years.
-
And liberal scientists secretly buried fossils to test the devout Christians in their faith to Jesus and god.
333366 stick to collecting debts and sports. Science is not your forte what so ever.
So it's yours?
Can I give you a simple heat transfer problem to solve since you are such an expert on heat?
-
It looks like he ate everything in his environment in his later years.
He bought twelve islands, Tetiaroa, and intended to make them all as an expansive Environmental Laboratory.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tetiaroa.jpg)
-
So it's yours?
Can I give you a simple heat transfer problem to solve since you are such an expert on heat?
Can you pinpoint SIRT1 and scan for any variance among deacetylating proteins and their quantitative effect on neighboring mammalian genes SIRT1-SIRT7?
-
Can you pinpoint SIRT1 and scan for any variance among deacetylating proteins and their quantitative effect on neighboring mammalian genes SIRT1-SIRT7?
Being a debt collector seems a little easier and more profitable than that. ;D
-
Can you pinpoint SIRT1 and scan for any variance among deacetylating proteins and their quantitative effect on neighboring mammalian genes SIRT1-SIRT7?
You lying bastard, you think you're the only one who read pubmed?
Every time you tried to act smart you have been owned over and over, when will you learn?
-
why start another thread with more refutable articles that are written either by agenda driven scientists (or sometimes not even that) or written by some oil funded scientist who lies the way doctors did about tobacco causing cancer because of tobacco money.
You were getting destroyed in TA's thread so you start a new one to what? Prove you are a lost soul beholden only to your god of money? Cap and Trade is going through and it'll be a great day when it does.
-
Can you pinpoint SIRT1 and scan for any variance among deacetylating proteins and their quantitative effect on neighboring mammalian genes SIRT1-SIRT7?
::)
Oh Christ.
-
Cap and Trade is going through and it'll be a great day when it does.
kcballer, can you list the pros of cap and trade
-
kcballer, can you list the pros of cap and trade
I can:
1. Goldman Sachs will make billions and have a new market to exploit.
2. Al Gore will make billions as a middle man trading carbon credits.
3. Taxpayers will be forced to retrofit their homes.
4. We will lead the world by example.
5. Taxpayers will be forced to consume less energy through skyrocketing costs of electricity
6. The govt will grow exponentially.
Cant you see the benefits of all of this?
-
I can:
1. Goldman Sachs will make billions and have a new market to exploit.
2. Al Gore will make billions as a middle man trading carbon credits.
3. Taxpayers will be forced to retrofit their homes.
4. We will lead the world by example.
5. Taxpayers will be forced to consume less energy through skyrocketing costs of electricity
6. The govt will grow exponentially.
Cant you see the benefits of all of this?
hell no. that's why i want to see the pros. what are they? there must be some. i find it hard to believe the people that voted for the bill are all morons or corrupt. not all of them, right?
i would like kcballer or someone to tell me the pros that are being presented by these people that are for this bill.
-
Can you pinpoint SIRT1 and scan for any variance among deacetylating proteins and their quantitative effect on neighboring mammalian genes SIRT1-SIRT7?
adonis are you in grad school? when did you graduate from UNC?
-
adonis are you in grad school? when did you graduate from UNC?
Just ask KC how cap & trade worked out for Germany & Spain.
-
Just ask KC how cap & trade worked out for Germany & Spain.
suggested links?
when is the senate voting on this?
-
suggested links?
when is the senate voting on this?
I called both my senators and they said late august early september.
-
I called both my senators and they said late august early september.
SPAIN LOST 2.2 JOBS FOR EVERY "GREEN JOB" CREATED AT A COST OF $800,000 PER JOB.
WHY SHOULD WE TRUST THIS MAN????
-
adonis are you in grad school? when did you graduate from UNC?
Grad school? LOL!
Gaydonis hardly managed high school, I can assure you that if he was studying in a university he would have tried to use it to impress us like he tries with his daily cut and paste ....how pitiful.
-
Grad school? LOL!
Gaydonis hardly managed high school, I can assure you that if he was studying in a university he would have tried to use it to impress us like he tries with his daily cut and paste ....how pitiful.
so he's not in grad school?
adonis, when did you graduate from UNC or when did you finish though you may not have received your degree because of the parking tickets?
-
so he's not in grad school?
adonis, when did you graduate from UNC or when did you finish though you may not have received your degree because of the parking tickets?
He never entered UNC, never enrolled to grad school.
He lives of the money his family , including his sister that he claims it's his girlfriend give him.
-
He never entered UNC, never enrolled to grad school.
are you sure? he's said several times he attended UNC and would have graduated if he would have paid some parking tickets.
adonis, what year did you or would you have graduated?
jezebelle is his sister? does that mean she's available 8)
-
are you sure? he's said several times he attended UNC and would have graduated if he would have paid some parking tickets.
adonis, what year did you or would you have graduated?
jezebelle is his sister? does that mean she's available 8)
He could have worked as a janitor at UNC Grad school. That would fit the criteria right?
-
He could have worked as a janitor at UNC Grad school. That would fit the criteria right?
i suppose that would cover that *he went* to UNC
i don't think he stated he went to grad school there, but just that he graduated from there, or would have, if he would have paid his parking tickets
-
So the rich Gaydonis that made millions at the stock market, bought a Lotus etc couldn't pay a few parking tickets to get a degree ? Riiiighhht.....I really hope he's lying about it because if he isn't he's the most useless person in the world....seriously...par king tickets lol....
Besides...this great protector of civil rights park illegally? How could that be....
Come on now people...the "man" is a fucking loser.
-
So the rich Gaydonis that made millions at the stock market, bought a Lotus etc couldn't pay a few parking tickets to get a degree ? Riiiighhht.....I really hope he's lying about it because if he isn't he's the most useless person in the world....seriously...par king tickets lol....
Besides...this great protector of civil rights park illegally? How could that be....
Come on now people...the "man" is a fucking loser.
oh no he won't pay it on principle
Do you have a college degree?
I still owe a few hundred dollars as they seem convinced that I will surrender my innocence by paying parking tickets to which I do not owe for the simple fact that my windshield is heated and the sticker could not be applied in the specified location thus resulting in pitiless violation after violation of a technicality enforced by several jealous parking attendants and students for no justifiable reason.
I will never pay on principle.
I'll take that as a "No"..... :)
Take that as a yes indeed, but with an asterisk. Obviously you have never been or you have simply payed your parking tickets "like a bitch" as the less cultured say.
a smart man would have made that sticker stand on ;)
It was a total scam. I stuck the sticker on the right hand top corner where the heated windshield would not melt the glue to my window, making a mess,(they instead wanted it on the bottom right corner) and the only way to appease them was to scrape it off. Well the rule is, if you do that, you have to pay another 200 for a new sticker. Being that the parking lot nazis were on to me and had already hated me due to a heated discussion with their superior, they would not have hesitated to continue to flag me.
So eventually I just stopped parking on that campus altogether and had to walk a considerable distance from a nearby restaurant parking lot.
you see? it was a scam designed to make money off of him.
-
oh no he won't pay it on principle
you see? it was a scam designed to make money off of him.
1.Liar, 200$ vs degree.... ::)
2.If he isn't a liar he's just plain stupid, there is an old saying "Don't be right, be smart" , not paying 200$ based on principle and losing an imaginary degree over it is simply retarded...seriously.
Let's even say that the fine got blown up...it's what ....1000$? 2000$? Still nothing to our Zonda driving liar...not to mention that it's still nothing compared to getting the degree.
Gaydonis is a pathological liar.
-
How surprising....that liar usually disappear whenever some facts pop up...he have a hard time dealing with reality :-\
-
How surprising....that liar usually disappear whenever some facts pop up...he have a hard time dealing with reality :-\
::)
-
::)
Check out this article TA - the alarmists such as yourself are losing the argument daily.
http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-41050320090715
-
::)
Great reply holy crusader for the fake cause of fighting parking tickets ::)
-
Check out this article TA - the alarmists such as yourself are losing the argument daily.
http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-41050320090715
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?
Do you not know how to read the articles you post? Again, your failure to comprehend the article let alone anything Science related shocks me.
From your article you posted:
http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-41050320090715?pageNumber=2&virtualBrandChannel=11584
"If this additional warming which we do not really understand, was caused as a response to the CO2 warming, then there is a chance that also a future warming could be more intense than people anticipate right now," Zeebe said.
He said the study suggested there could be atmospheric or ocean processes as yet unknown or poorly understood that might have accelerated the warming. Possibilities could be changes in ocean currents, a much larger release of methane or even greater impacts from higher CO2 levels than currently thought.
At present, CO2 levels have already risen from 280 parts per million to nearly 390 ppm since the Industrial Revolution and could exceed a 70 percent increase during this century, a rate much faster than the Palaeocene-Eocene event, Zeebe said.
While this would cause initial effects, much worse could follow in the coming decades and centuries as the oceans, land and atmosphere tried to deal with the higher CO2 levels, he said.
"The carbon that we put into the atmosphere right now is going to stay there for a very long time. Much of it will stay there for tens of thousands of years."
-
The point is that man really has nothing to do with this.
-
The point is that man really has nothing to do with this.
Again, DID YOU NOT READ THE ARTICLE?
Look at what I highlighted. The catalyst for Palaeocene-Eocene event as the article states is higher CO2 levels. These raised CO2 levels are the trigger, as the article states to additional and severe problems. So the higher the CO2 levels (which we are putting in the atmosphere in alarming rates your article states) the more this will trip the trigger for future calamities and even worsen them as a result of our pollution. This is all contained in your article that you posted.
Do you understand it now? The article is clearly pointing out that our CO2 levels that we keep putting in the atmosphere may trigger future disaster, worse than initially proposed.
-
Again, DID YOU NOT READ THE ARTICLE?
Look at what I highlighted. The catalyst for Palaeocene-Eocene event as the article states is higher CO2 levels. These raised CO2 levels are the trigger, as the article states to additional and severe problems. So the higher the CO2 levels (which we are putting in the atmosphere in alarming rates your article states) the more this will trip the trigger for future calamities and even worsen them as a result of our pollution. This is all contained in your article that you posted.
Do you understand it now? The article is clearly pointing out that our CO2 levels that we keep putting in the atmosphere may trigger future disaster, worse than initially proposed.
Why do you keep lying?
Why are you embarrassed by the truth?
-
Why do you keep lying?
Why are you embarrassed by the truth?
Read the article.
-
1.Liar, 200$ vs degree.... ::)
2.If he isn't a liar he's just plain stupid, there is an old saying "Don't be right, be smart" , not paying 200$ based on principle and losing an imaginary degree over it is simply retarded...seriously.
Let's even say that the fine got blown up...it's what ....1000$? 2000$? Still nothing to our Zonda driving liar...not to mention that it's still nothing compared to getting the degree.
Gaydonis is a pathological liar.
the more i see of his posts the more i am starting to agree :-\
-
the more i see of his posts the more i am starting to agree :-\
So you too cannot discern the above article?
???
I think the problem here is the inability to effectively discern and interpret information correctly. It seems to be quite a pattern with some of you guys.
-
So you too cannot discern the above article?
???
I think the problem here is the inability to effectively discern and interpret information correctly. It seems to be quite a pattern with some of you guys.
Liar.
-
So you too cannot discern the above article?
???
I think the problem here is the inability to effectively discern and interpret information correctly. It seems to be quite a pattern with some of you guys.
Because only the magnificent TA can do that right? ::) ::)
-
So you too cannot discern the above article?
???
I think the problem here is the inability to effectively discern and interpret information correctly. It seems to be quite a pattern with some of you guys.
i didn't read the article. i'm talking about other posts of yours i've read recently.
partially i think you could really believe the bull you post and partially i think you're just trying to irritate people. initially i thought it was the latter which made you pretty funny but now i'm starting to wonder.
-
i didn't read the article. i'm talking about other posts of yours i've read recently.
partially i think you could really believe the bull you post and partially i think you're just trying to irritate people. initially i thought it was the latter which made you pretty funny but now i'm starting to wonder.
Well lets talk about the article that was posted. There is no possible way for disagreement for what it states as the article appears.
-
Well lets talk about the article that was posted. There is no possible way for disagreement for what it states as the article appears.
Only an ignorant man can say such a sentence.
It only shows what you know about science, people used to say the world is flat .... it was a fact! There were amazing articles about it! Just like the one you posted..... ::)
-
Only an ignorant man can say such a sentence.
It only shows what you know about science, people used to say the world is flat .... it was a fact! There were amazing articles about it! Just like the one you posted..... ::)
What are you talking about?
-
What are you talking about?
You claim that it's impossible to disagree with your article and that it provides undeniable facts ::)
-
You claim that it's impossible to disagree with your article and that it provides undeniable facts ::)
Again, your failure to comprehend is showing. It is impossible to disagree with the intent of the article as it was presented. In other words, 333366 did not realize that the articles meaning was totally opposite to what he thought or would have liked it to mean. You, like the others, have fallen victim as well which clearly shows your inability to discern an article and its intent, instead hooking your own slant contrary to what the article portrays.
Its downright strange and mental to do this and not even realize it.
-
Again, your failure to comprehend is showing. It is impossible to disagree with the intent of the article as it was presented. In other words, 333366 did not realize that the articles meaning was totally opposite to what he thought or would have liked it to mean. You, like the others, have fallen victim as well which clearly shows your inability to discern an article and its intent, instead hooking your own slant contrary to what the article portrays.
Its downright strange and mental to do this and not even realize it.
right, cuz TA is the only genius who knows how to read. ::)
-
right, cuz TA is the only genius who knows how to read. ::)
Do you admit that you either did not read the article that you posted or that you did not grasp the meaning of it or understand it? Or, did you read the article, get angry at it, then decide to make up the total opposite intent and meaning of the article and attach it?
It has to be one of those. Either way it was irresponsible to do.
-
Do you admit that you either did not read the article that you posted or that you did not grasp the meaning of it or understand it? Or, did you read the article, get angry at it, then decide to make up the total opposite intent and meaning of the article and attach it?
It has to be one of those. Either way it was irresponsible to do.
I read the article but come to a different conclusion than you do.
-
I read the article but come to a different conclusion than you do.
It was impossible to do so based on the contents of the article. You presented the article falsely and did not realize it went against entirely what you were claiming.
You know, it is ok to admit your mistake.
-
um ... on that second article I mean it does say an increase of CO2 levels will cause catastrophe right? ok check
um ... where is this CO2 coming from again? out of volcanos or something (something about increasing since the beginning of the industrial revolution)? so is it man made ... boy this is really hard :(
-
um ... on that second article I mean it does say an increase of CO2 levels will cause catastrophe right? ok check
um ... where is this CO2 coming from again? out of volcanos or something (something about increasing since the beginning of the industrial revolution)? so is it man made ... boy this is really hard :(
Not another one. :o
Read the second page and what the Scientist, who was in charge of the study, says about "the Industrial Revolution", and its effect on CO2 levels as a direct cause as well as the other points he made about how that this may be worse of a dnager and brought on quicker by humans than the Paleocene event.
Do you not know what the Industrial Revolution was? Serious question.
-
um ... on that second article I mean it does say an increase of CO2 levels will cause catastrophe right? ok check
um ... where is this CO2 coming from again? out of volcanos or something (something about increasing since the beginning of the industrial revolution)? so is it man made ... boy this is really hard :(
Man caused volcanoes to erupt?
-
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?
Do you not know how to read the articles you post? Again, your failure to comprehend the article let alone anything Science related shocks me.
From your article you posted:
http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-41050320090715?pageNumber=2&virtualBrandChannel=11584
"If this additional warming which we do not really understand, was caused as a response to the CO2 warming, then there is a chance that also a future warming could be more intense than people anticipate right now," Zeebe said.
He said the study suggested there could be atmospheric or ocean processes as yet unknown or poorly understood that might have accelerated the warming. Possibilities could be changes in ocean currents, a much larger release of methane or even greater impacts from higher CO2 levels than currently thought.
At present, CO2 levels have already risen from 280 parts per million to nearly 390 ppm since the Industrial Revolution and could exceed a 70 percent increase during this century, a rate much faster than the Palaeocene-Eocene event, Zeebe said.
While this would cause initial effects, much worse could follow in the coming decades and centuries as the oceans, land and atmosphere tried to deal with the higher CO2 levels, he said.
"The carbon that we put into the atmosphere right now is going to stay there for a very long time. Much of it will stay there for tens of thousands of years."
-
How many is it now that can`t comprehend a simple article?
I have lost count.
-
Not another one. :o
Read the second page and what the Scientist, who was in charge of the study, says about "the Industrial Revolution", and its effect on CO2 levels as a direct cause as well as the other points he made about how that this may be worse of a dnager and brought on quicker by humans than the Paleocene event.
Do you not know what the Industrial Revolution was? Serious question.
As I was saying, taking someone opinion and study as an undisputed fact it plain ignorance.
ESPECIALLY considering what we're dealing with here.
Ironically me and one of my friends (doing his PhD now) talked about how things always seem as facts in science while they get completely obsolete every 20 years.
-
As I was saying, taking someone opinion and study as an undisputed fact it plain ignorance.
ESPECIALLY considering what we're dealing with here.
Ironically me and one of my friends (doing his PhD now) talked about how things always seem as facts in science while they get completely obsolete every 20 years.
Again, the intent and meaning of the article was totally opposite to what you and the others thought it meant.
That=poor comprehension.
-
Again, the intent and meaning of the article was totally opposite to what you and the others thought it meant.
That=poor comprehension.
When did I mention anything specific about the article?
I simply stated one of your many mistakes "the man with a degree...almost....with an asterisks ..." ::)