Chills of Global Cooling (Global Warming is simply not happenng)

[The True Adonis]

the more i see of his posts the more i am starting to agree

So you too cannot discern the above article?
 

I think the problem here is the inability to effectively discern and interpret information correctly.  It seems to be quite a pattern with some of you guys.

[IFBBwannaB]

So you too cannot discern the above article?
 

I think the problem here is the inability to effectively discern and interpret information correctly.  It seems to be quite a pattern with some of you guys.

Liar.

[Soul Crusher]

So you too cannot discern the above article?
 

I think the problem here is the inability to effectively discern and interpret information correctly.  It seems to be quite a pattern with some of you guys.

Because only the magnificent TA can do that right?   

[boonasty]

So you too cannot discern the above article?
 

I think the problem here is the inability to effectively discern and interpret information correctly.  It seems to be quite a pattern with some of you guys.

i didn't read the article.  i'm talking about other posts of yours i've read recently.


partially i think you could really believe the bull you post and partially i think you're just trying to irritate people.  initially i thought it was the latter which made you pretty funny but now i'm starting to wonder.

[The True Adonis]

i didn't read the article.  i'm talking about other posts of yours i've read recently.


partially i think you could really believe the bull you post and partially i think you're just trying to irritate people.  initially i thought it was the latter which made you pretty funny but now i'm starting to wonder.

Well lets talk about the article that was posted.  There is no possible way for disagreement for what it states as the article appears. 

[IFBBwannaB]

Well lets talk about the article that was posted.  There is no possible way for disagreement for what it states as the article appears. 

Only an ignorant man can say such a sentence.

It only shows what you know about science, people used to say the world is flat .... it was a fact! There were amazing articles about it! Just like the one you posted.....

[The True Adonis]

Only an ignorant man can say such a sentence.

It only shows what you know about science, people used to say the world is flat .... it was a fact! There were amazing articles about it! Just like the one you posted.....

What are you talking about?

[IFBBwannaB]

What are you talking about?

You claim that it's impossible to disagree with your article and that it provides undeniable facts 

[The True Adonis]

You claim that it's impossible to disagree with your article and that it provides undeniable facts 

Again, your failure to comprehend is showing.  It is impossible to disagree with the intent of the article as it was presented.  In other words, 333366 did not realize that the articles meaning was totally opposite to what he thought or would have liked it to mean.  You, like the others, have fallen victim as well which clearly shows your inability to discern an article and its intent, instead hooking your own slant contrary to what the article portrays.

Its downright strange and mental to do this and not even realize it.

[Soul Crusher]

Again, your failure to comprehend is showing.  It is impossible to disagree with the intent of the article as it was presented.  In other words, 333366 did not realize that the articles meaning was totally opposite to what he thought or would have liked it to mean.  You, like the others, have fallen victim as well which clearly shows your inability to discern an article and its intent, instead hooking your own slant contrary to what the article portrays.

Its downright strange and mental to do this and not even realize it.

right, cuz TA is the only genius who knows how to read.   

[The True Adonis]

right, cuz TA is the only genius who knows how to read.   

Do you admit that you either did not read the article that you posted or that you did not grasp the meaning of it or understand it? Or, did you read the article, get angry at it, then decide to make up the total opposite intent and meaning of the article and attach it?

It has to be one of those.  Either way it was irresponsible to do.

[Soul Crusher]

Do you admit that you either did not read the article that you posted or that you did not grasp the meaning of it or understand it? Or, did you read the article, get angry at it, then decide to make up the total opposite intent and meaning of the article and attach it?

It has to be one of those.  Either way it was irresponsible to do.

I read the article but come to a different conclusion than you do. 

[The True Adonis]

I read the article but come to a different conclusion than you do. 

It was impossible to do so based on the contents of the article.  You presented the article falsely and did not realize it went against entirely what you were claiming.


You know, it is ok to admit your mistake.

[gcb]

um ... on that second article I mean it does say an increase of CO2 levels will cause catastrophe right? ok check
um ... where is this CO2 coming from again? out of volcanos or something (something about increasing since the beginning of the industrial revolution)? so is it man made ... boy this is really hard 

[The True Adonis]

um ... on that second article I mean it does say an increase of CO2 levels will cause catastrophe right? ok check
um ... where is this CO2 coming from again? out of volcanos or something (something about increasing since the beginning of the industrial revolution)? so is it man made ... boy this is really hard 

Not another one.   

Read the second page and what the Scientist, who was in charge of the study, says about "the Industrial Revolution", and its effect on CO2 levels as a direct cause as well as the other points he made about how that this may be worse of a dnager and brought on quicker by humans than the Paleocene event.

Do you not know what the Industrial Revolution was?  Serious question.

[Soul Crusher]

um ... on that second article I mean it does say an increase of CO2 levels will cause catastrophe right? ok check
um ... where is this CO2 coming from again? out of volcanos or something (something about increasing since the beginning of the industrial revolution)? so is it man made ... boy this is really hard 

Man caused volcanoes to erupt?

[The True Adonis]

WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?

Do you not know how to read the articles you post?   Again, your failure to comprehend the article let alone anything Science related shocks me.

From your article you posted:

http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-41050320090715?pageNumber=2&virtualBrandChannel=11584

"If this additional warming which we do not really understand, was caused as a response to the CO2 warming, then there is a chance that also a future warming could be more intense than people anticipate right now," Zeebe said.

He said the study suggested there could be atmospheric or ocean processes as yet unknown or poorly understood that might have accelerated the warming. Possibilities could be changes in ocean currents, a much larger release of methane or even greater impacts from higher CO2 levels than currently thought.

At present, CO2 levels have already risen from 280 parts per million to nearly 390 ppm since the Industrial Revolution and could exceed a 70 percent increase during this century, a rate much faster than the Palaeocene-Eocene event, Zeebe said.

While this would cause initial effects, much worse could follow in the coming decades and centuries as the oceans, land and atmosphere tried to deal with the higher CO2 levels, he said.

"The carbon that we put into the atmosphere right now is going to stay there for a very long time. Much of it will stay there for tens of thousands of years."

[The True Adonis]

How many is it now that can`t comprehend a simple article?

I have lost count.

[IFBBwannaB]

Not another one.   

Read the second page and what the Scientist, who was in charge of the study, says about "the Industrial Revolution", and its effect on CO2 levels as a direct cause as well as the other points he made about how that this may be worse of a dnager and brought on quicker by humans than the Paleocene event.

Do you not know what the Industrial Revolution was?  Serious question.

As I was saying, taking someone opinion and study as an undisputed fact it plain ignorance.
ESPECIALLY considering what we're dealing with here.

Ironically me and one of my friends (doing his PhD now) talked about how things always seem as facts in science while they get completely obsolete every 20 years.

[The True Adonis]

As I was saying, taking someone opinion and study as an undisputed fact it plain ignorance.
ESPECIALLY considering what we're dealing with here.

Ironically me and one of my friends (doing his PhD now) talked about how things always seem as facts in science while they get completely obsolete every 20 years.

Again, the intent and meaning of the article was totally opposite to what you and the others thought it meant.

That=poor comprehension.

[IFBBwannaB]

Again, the intent and meaning of the article was totally opposite to what you and the others thought it meant.

That=poor comprehension.

When did I mention anything specific about the article?

I simply stated one of your many mistakes "the man with a degree...almost....with an asterisks ..."