Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Sherief Shalaby on July 13, 2009, 11:35:42 PM

Title: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on July 13, 2009, 11:35:42 PM
this is not another Nasser vs. Dorian thread.. I am just comparing Nasser to Dorian here because Dorian is always referred to as the thickest from the side!..

Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Method101 on July 14, 2009, 12:03:22 AM
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Alex23 on July 14, 2009, 12:15:44 AM
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/gallery/musclegallery11/ar244.jpg)
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on July 14, 2009, 12:17:23 AM
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/gallery/musclegallery11/ar244.jpg)

arnold's shoulders were poor beside his great chest!!
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Mars on July 14, 2009, 12:22:13 AM
wish my delts were that poor.
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on July 14, 2009, 12:40:57 AM
wish my delts were that poor.

but like this your chest will look poor beside them  ;D
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: alnassak on July 14, 2009, 12:45:56 AM
this is not another Nasser vs. Dorian thread.. I am just comparing Nasser to Dorian here because Dorian is always referred to as the thickest from the side!..


There is no Contest between Nasser & Dorian.  :-\

Nasser smokes Dorian everywhere except back  ;)

Moreover, I hardly believe that Dorian Yates is the MOST overrated bodybuilder of all time. He had been smoked by the top bodybuilders in his era such as Kevin, Flex, Shawn, & Nassir in every contest they face each other

In my BOOK, he hasn’t won any Olympia title.  

Here is what registered in my book in regard to Dorian actual history

92 He came “far” second to Kevin

93 he came second to Flex

94 last place due to missing a body part and shitty condition + huge gut (Kevin & Shawn were fighting for first & second)

95 last place due to missing a body part + having a gut (Kevin & Nassir were fighting for first & second)

96 last place due to missing a body part and having a huge gut with shitty condition (Nassir & Shawn were fighting for first & second)

97 last place due to missing a body part and for showing the most bloated\mess physique ever (Kevin & Nassir were fighting for first & second)

Too bad that politics can give out 6 Olympia titles for a bloated miss physique  :-\
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: alnassak on July 14, 2009, 12:46:47 AM
but like this your chest will look poor beside them  ;D

hahahahahah  ;D
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Sam on July 14, 2009, 12:56:38 AM
There is no Contest between Nasser & Dorian.  :-\

Nasser smokes Dorian everywhere except back  ;)

Moreover, I hardly believe that Dorian Yates is the MOST overrated bodybuilder of all time. He had been smoked by the top bodybuilders in his era such as Kevin, Flex, Shawn, & Nassir in every contest they face each other

In my BOOK, he hasn’t won any Olympia title.  

Here is what registered in my book in regard to Dorian actual history

92 He came “far” second to Kevin

93 he came second to Flex

94 last place due to missing a body part and shitty condition + huge gut (Kevin & Shawn were fighting for first & second)

95 last place due to missing a body part + having a gut (Kevin & Nassir were fighting for first & second)

96 last place due to missing a body part and having a huge gut with shitty condition (Nassir & Shawn were fighting for first & second)

97 last place due to missing a body part and for showing the most bloated\mess physique ever (Kevin & Nassir were fighting for first & second)

Too bad that politics can give out 6 Olympia titles for a bloated miss physique  :-\


"Hardly believe"" means you dont really believe it in english.

Make up your mind, whats it gonna be? :D

BTW, where do i buy your book?
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Palpatine Q on July 14, 2009, 12:57:43 AM
Nasser was a cock from all angles
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on July 14, 2009, 01:04:23 AM
There is no Contest between Nasser & Dorian.  :-\

Nasser smokes Dorian everywhere except back  ;)

Moreover, I hardly believe that Dorian Yates is the MOST overrated bodybuilder of all time. He had been smoked by the top bodybuilders in his era such as Kevin, Flex, Shawn, & Nassir in every contest they face each other

In my BOOK, he hasn’t won any Olympia title.  

Here is what registered in my book in regard to Dorian actual history

92 He came “far” second to Kevin

93 he came second to Flex

94 last place due to missing a body part and shitty condition + huge gut (Kevin & Shawn were fighting for first & second)

95 last place due to missing a body part + having a gut (Kevin & Nassir were fighting for first & second)

96 last place due to missing a body part and having a huge gut with shitty condition (Nassir & Shawn were fighting for first & second)

97 last place due to missing a body part 2 body parts and for showing the most bloated\mess physique ever (Kevin & Nassir were fighting for first & second)

Too bad that politics can give out 6 Olympia titles for a bloated miss physique  :-\


fixed  8)
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: mossel on July 14, 2009, 01:05:49 AM
Dennis Wolf wins.

Failed again...
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on July 14, 2009, 01:07:47 AM
Nasser was a cock from all angles

and you are a pussy from all angles  ;D
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: alnassak on July 14, 2009, 01:08:57 AM
"Hardly believe"" means you dont really believe it in english.

Make up your mind, whats it gonna be? :D

BTW, where do i buy your book?

Sorry it is my bad English  :-[

I should have written that in Arabic so that you could understand it well  :D
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: alnassak on July 14, 2009, 01:09:45 AM
and you are a pussy from all angles  ;D

hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhahahahahahahha  ;D
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Matt C on July 14, 2009, 01:19:18 AM
wish my delts were that poor.

I'm sure your delts are as good as that guy who was in the casket.

Also, I would have to give it to Dorian for side thickness based on video footage that I have seen.
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on July 14, 2009, 01:31:57 AM
I'm sure your delts are as good as that guy who was in the casket.

Also, I would have to give it to Dorian for side thickness based on video footage that I have seen.

delete 'Team Nasser" from your details immediately ;D..

sure dorian was thick from the side but as you see nasser was comparable and not flat at all as many ppl like to claim just to underrate him.. as i said this is not another nasser and dorian comparison, it's just to show that nasser was not flat from the side..
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: FlexGuns on July 14, 2009, 01:40:57 AM
Nasser was a cock from all angles


hahha LOL,  ;D, The only people that think Nasser did well are a bunch of foreign terrorists.  ;D  Only a person with very little intelligence is a Nasser fan. So basically we have about 4 arabs here that are having meltdowns over a guy who got beat and has only a handful of wins, compared to the American champions.  ;D





















































Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on July 14, 2009, 02:17:24 AM

hahha LOL,  ;D, The only people that think Nasser did well are a bunch of foreign terrorists.  ;D  Only a person with very little intelligence is a Nasser fan. So basically we have about 4 arabs here that are having meltdowns over a guy who got beat and has only a handful of wins, compared to the American champions.  ;D























































so why you had considered him a 2nd-3rd place finisher at the olympia if he competed today??

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=52108.msg814247#msg814247

you are another one of those idiots GB is full of whose stupidity and hatred own them all the time :-\
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: rocket on July 14, 2009, 04:13:10 AM
this is not another Nasser vs. Dorian thread.. I am just comparing Nasser to Dorian here because Dorian is always referred to as the thickest from the side!..


I honestly have no idea how you cannot see that those two are at different angles to the camera, and still compare them with pixel measurement.  Look at the abs.  Since Dorian is more purely on his side you can expect the difference to shrink and perhaps come in Dorians favour if Nassers turns to the same position.

Not that I really care, I'm not a fan of either them.  Just pointing out yet another comparison based on faulty logic (albeit not quite as bad as posting pictures of wolf vs 5ft 8 bodybuilders with both being the same height in the side by side comparison).

Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: D_1000 on July 14, 2009, 01:44:16 PM

hahha LOL,  ;D, The only people that think Nasser did well are a bunch of foreign terrorists.  ;D  Only a person with very little intelligence is a Nasser fan.

You're going to get car bombed now, you know.

 ;D
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: lvtolft on July 14, 2009, 02:05:39 PM
I honestly have no idea how you cannot see that those two are at different angles to the camera, and still compare them with pixel measurement.  Look at the abs.  Since Dorian is more purely on his side you can expect the difference to shrink and perhaps come in Dorians favour if Nassers turns to the same position.

Not that I really care, I'm not a fan of either them.  Just pointing out yet another comparison based on faulty logic (albeit not quite as bad as posting pictures of wolf vs 5ft 8 bodybuilders with both being the same height in the side by side comparison).


A sensible post?  No, not on GB!
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: bigbobs on July 14, 2009, 02:11:53 PM
I honestly have no idea how you cannot see that those two are at different angles to the camera, and still compare them with pixel measurement.  Look at the abs.  Since Dorian is more purely on his side you can expect the difference to shrink and perhaps come in Dorians favour if Nassers turns to the same position.

Not that I really care, I'm not a fan of either them.  Just pointing out yet another comparison based on faulty logic (albeit not quite as bad as posting pictures of wolf vs 5ft 8 bodybuilders with both being the same height in the side by side comparison).



How about this one then?

The "Dorian was thicker from the side" is just a baseless excuse the Dorian nuthuggers use to cling to their fantasy that Dorian deserved each of his Mr. O wins.  Similar baseless excuses are "There's something about Dorian that looked different in person, pictures don't do him justice."
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: lvtolft on July 14, 2009, 02:16:39 PM
How about this one then?

The "Dorian was thicker from the side" is just a baseless excuse the Dorian nuthuggers use to cling to their fantasy that Dorian deserved each of his Mr. O wins.  Similar baseless excuses are "There's something about Dorian that looked different in person, pictures don't do him justice."

The picture is still not a straight on and Nasser is closer to the camera.  Also, Nasser has Dorian on arms, that is it.
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Mr Nobody on July 14, 2009, 02:18:20 PM
Lets see the backs
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: bigbobs on July 14, 2009, 02:20:22 PM
The picture is still not a straight on and Nasser is closer to the camera.  Also, Nasser has Dorian on arms, that is it.

What does it matter if the picture is straight on or not, when simply comparing thickness from the side angle?  Yes, he's a tad bit closer to the camera but that does not make up for all the size difference  that's evident in that  pic.  Not only arms, but delts, chest, smaller waist, bigger legs.
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Antony77 on July 14, 2009, 02:21:30 PM
arnold's shoulders were poor beside his great chest!!

He did have a great chest no doubt about it.

(http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo324/Tyrol3/arnoldbigchest.jpg)
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: lvtolft on July 14, 2009, 02:26:17 PM
What does it matter if the picture is straight on or not, when simply comparing thickness from the side angle?  Yes, he's a tad bit closer to the camera but that does not make up for all the size difference  that's evident in that  pic.  Not only arms, but delts, chest, smaller waist, bigger legs.
Honestly, I don't have a preference for either, but when angle and closeness to the camera is EVERYTHING when comparing thickness.  The thickness will appear greater the closer you get and, depending on the angle, can also appear much wider.
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: bigbobs on July 14, 2009, 02:27:34 PM
Lets see the backs

Front and back.

Nasser is so far ahead of Yates in all areas other than the back that it more than makes up for Yates' better back.

Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: bigbobs on July 14, 2009, 02:29:20 PM
Honestly, I don't have a preference for either, but when angle and closeness to the camera is EVERYTHING when comparing thickness.  The thickness will appear greater the closer you get and, depending on the angle, can also appear much wider.

Exactly why I chose a picture where they were practically at the same angle. 

And the closeness to the camera is slighter than the difference in size.  Otherwise, one can dismiss any picture of an amateur next to Ronnie Coleman by saying there's a difference in distance from the camera between the two :)
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on July 14, 2009, 02:40:00 PM
this is not another Nasser vs. Dorian thread.. I am just comparing Nasser to Dorian here because Dorian is always referred to as the thickest from the side!..



lmfao at this isn't a Dorian Vs Nasser thread and that stupid as comparison at two different angles lol I love your threads they are always good for a laugh

YOU CAN NOT measure thickness in 2 dimensional photographs
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on July 14, 2009, 02:41:59 PM
There is no Contest between Nasser & Dorian.  :-\



You got this part right  ;D
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on July 14, 2009, 03:37:49 PM
im not a nasser fan, but nasser does look better in these photographs...

i actually think very lowly of nasser in general, but in these pics, he should have won. 



I agree.  :-\
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Relentless on July 14, 2009, 04:16:13 PM
Nasser was a more complete bodybuilder than Dorian Yates.
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on July 14, 2009, 04:37:53 PM
Nasser was a more complete bodybuilder than Dorian Yates.

Not at his best he wasn't not by a long shot
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Danimal77 on July 14, 2009, 05:36:39 PM
It's undeniable how great Nasser was (1994 Mr. Olympia through to the 1999 Arnold Classic), but Nasser always struck me as being HUGE, but SOFT.
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on July 14, 2009, 05:42:37 PM
It's undeniable how great Nasser was (1994 Mr. Olympia through to the 1999 Arnold Classic), but Nasser always struck me as being HUGE, but SOFT.

He was an awesome bodybuilder from the front from the sides he wasn't the imposing force and from the back he sucked because of his back , his conditioning was good from the front but as you said from the back he was huge and soft looked much better lighter because his conditioning was more consistent
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: the_swami on July 14, 2009, 10:01:18 PM
Front and back.

Nasser is so far ahead of Yates in all areas other than the back that it more than makes up for Yates' better back.



x2!

in the back comparison pic Nasser is beating dorian in the overall pose.
yates is only margianlly drier and seperated in the back there- that is the only slight advantage he had over Nasser.
Nasser crushes dorian in every other pose.

no doubt about it- Yates was given the most gifts of any mr O- the yates- weinberger-manion  friendship got Yates his sandows.
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on July 14, 2009, 10:15:03 PM
The picture is still not a straight on and Nasser is closer to the camera.  Also, Nasser has Dorian on arms, that is it.

i agree that nasser is closer to the camera here but in this pose nasser owns dorian in arms, shoulders, chest, and, quads.. dorian owns him only in calves because dorian's are more detailed from the side than nasser's..
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on July 14, 2009, 10:20:24 PM
lmfao at this isn't a Dorian Vs Nasser thread and that stupid as comparison at two different angles lol I love your threads they are always good for a laugh

YOU CAN NOT measure thickness in 2 dimensional photographs

i am happy my threads come to you as a comic relief after hulcher makes you cry in all D vs. R threads  ;D
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: The_Hammer on July 14, 2009, 10:31:43 PM
There is no Contest between Nasser & Dorian.  :-\

Nasser smokes Dorian everywhere except back  ;)

Moreover, I hardly believe that Dorian Yates is the MOST overrated bodybuilder of all time. He had been smoked by the top bodybuilders in his era such as Kevin, Flex, Shawn, & Nassir in every contest they face each other

In my BOOK, he hasn’t won any Olympia title.  

Here is what registered in my book in regard to Dorian actual history

92 He came “far” second to Kevin

93 he came second to Flex

94 last place due to missing a body part and shitty condition + huge gut (Kevin & Shawn were fighting for first & second)

95 last place due to missing a body part + having a gut (Kevin & Nassir were fighting for first & second)

96 last place due to missing a body part and having a huge gut with shitty condition (Nassir & Shawn were fighting for first & second)

97 last place due to missing a body part and for showing the most bloated\mess physique ever (Kevin & Nassir were fighting for first & second)

Too bad that politics can give out 6 Olympia titles for a bloated miss physique  :-\


Who the fuck cares what you think, little homo.
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on July 14, 2009, 10:35:41 PM
Who the fuck cares what you think, little homo.

you yourself care since you have commeneted on what he had written ;)
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: The_Hammer on July 14, 2009, 10:38:38 PM
you yourself care since you have commeneted on what he had written ;)

Shut your dirty sand negro mouth.
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: BigBrianB on July 14, 2009, 10:48:19 PM
 :-\

http://www.hugenasser.com/store/worn/
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on July 14, 2009, 10:49:46 PM
Shut your dirty sand negro mouth.

sand negro ::)

why do you hate "us"??..
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: kiwiol on July 14, 2009, 11:15:13 PM
:-\

http://www.hugenasser.com/store/worn/

Used posing trunks for sale. Oh brother.
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on July 15, 2009, 01:11:36 AM
i am happy my threads come to you as a comic relief after hulcher makes you cry in all D vs. R threads  ;D


He's funnier than you are and both of you share the same delusion and obsession both of you are the biggest Dorian fan-boys on this site
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on July 15, 2009, 01:36:13 AM
He's funnier than you are and both of you share the same delusion and obsession both of you are the biggest Dorian fan-boys on this site

i never said i am not a dorian fan :-\ of course at his best he was great.. i attack his weak shows only.. :P
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Immortal_Technique on July 15, 2009, 06:39:32 AM
Front and back.

Nasser is so far ahead of Yates in all areas other than the back that it more than makes up for Yates' better back.



Scary isn't it, at that particular show, Dorian isn't winning on anything in that shot, not even calves. But I suppose the back difference was even bigger. Ronnie doesn;t always dominate in front relaxed. But usually wins quads/arms something from every angle. Quite rare to see such a torn up guy place first against such a dominant guy like Nasser.
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: rocket on July 15, 2009, 07:09:40 AM
How about this one then?

The "Dorian was thicker from the side" is just a baseless excuse the Dorian nuthuggers use to cling to their fantasy that Dorian deserved each of his Mr. O wins.  Similar baseless excuses are "There's something about Dorian that looked different in person, pictures don't do him justice."


Better comparison. 

Although it does confuse me - in the other photo dorian looked a whole lot bigger than nasser in delts, whereas this one seems to suggest the opposite.

Personally, I do not like your Nasser fever, but I'm with you on this one, he looks better. 
Title: Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
Post by: Sharma on July 15, 2009, 05:22:19 PM
 Proof yet again that Yates the reformed burglar still knew how to steal the Olympia crown from more deserving athletes