Author Topic: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..  (Read 5424 times)

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #25 on: July 14, 2009, 02:20:22 PM »
The picture is still not a straight on and Nasser is closer to the camera.  Also, Nasser has Dorian on arms, that is it.

What does it matter if the picture is straight on or not, when simply comparing thickness from the side angle?  Yes, he's a tad bit closer to the camera but that does not make up for all the size difference  that's evident in that  pic.  Not only arms, but delts, chest, smaller waist, bigger legs.

Antony77

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 261
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #26 on: July 14, 2009, 02:21:30 PM »
arnold's shoulders were poor beside his great chest!!

He did have a great chest no doubt about it.


lvtolft

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 768
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #27 on: July 14, 2009, 02:26:17 PM »
What does it matter if the picture is straight on or not, when simply comparing thickness from the side angle?  Yes, he's a tad bit closer to the camera but that does not make up for all the size difference  that's evident in that  pic.  Not only arms, but delts, chest, smaller waist, bigger legs.
Honestly, I don't have a preference for either, but when angle and closeness to the camera is EVERYTHING when comparing thickness.  The thickness will appear greater the closer you get and, depending on the angle, can also appear much wider.

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #28 on: July 14, 2009, 02:27:34 PM »
Lets see the backs

Front and back.

Nasser is so far ahead of Yates in all areas other than the back that it more than makes up for Yates' better back.


bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #29 on: July 14, 2009, 02:29:20 PM »
Honestly, I don't have a preference for either, but when angle and closeness to the camera is EVERYTHING when comparing thickness.  The thickness will appear greater the closer you get and, depending on the angle, can also appear much wider.

Exactly why I chose a picture where they were practically at the same angle. 

And the closeness to the camera is slighter than the difference in size.  Otherwise, one can dismiss any picture of an amateur next to Ronnie Coleman by saying there's a difference in distance from the camera between the two :)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83788
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #30 on: July 14, 2009, 02:40:00 PM »
this is not another Nasser vs. Dorian thread.. I am just comparing Nasser to Dorian here because Dorian is always referred to as the thickest from the side!..



lmfao at this isn't a Dorian Vs Nasser thread and that stupid as comparison at two different angles lol I love your threads they are always good for a laugh

YOU CAN NOT measure thickness in 2 dimensional photographs

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83788
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #31 on: July 14, 2009, 02:41:59 PM »
There is no Contest between Nasser & Dorian.  :-\



You got this part right  ;D

#1 Klaus fan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9203
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #32 on: July 14, 2009, 03:37:49 PM »
im not a nasser fan, but nasser does look better in these photographs...

i actually think very lowly of nasser in general, but in these pics, he should have won. 



I agree.  :-\

Relentless

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2807
  • Kevin Levrone is the genetic ideal.
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #33 on: July 14, 2009, 04:16:13 PM »
Nasser was a more complete bodybuilder than Dorian Yates.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83788
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #34 on: July 14, 2009, 04:37:53 PM »
Nasser was a more complete bodybuilder than Dorian Yates.

Not at his best he wasn't not by a long shot

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #35 on: July 14, 2009, 05:36:39 PM »
It's undeniable how great Nasser was (1994 Mr. Olympia through to the 1999 Arnold Classic), but Nasser always struck me as being HUGE, but SOFT.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83788
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #36 on: July 14, 2009, 05:42:37 PM »
It's undeniable how great Nasser was (1994 Mr. Olympia through to the 1999 Arnold Classic), but Nasser always struck me as being HUGE, but SOFT.

He was an awesome bodybuilder from the front from the sides he wasn't the imposing force and from the back he sucked because of his back , his conditioning was good from the front but as you said from the back he was huge and soft looked much better lighter because his conditioning was more consistent

the_swami

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1776
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #37 on: July 14, 2009, 10:01:18 PM »
Front and back.

Nasser is so far ahead of Yates in all areas other than the back that it more than makes up for Yates' better back.



x2!

in the back comparison pic Nasser is beating dorian in the overall pose.
yates is only margianlly drier and seperated in the back there- that is the only slight advantage he had over Nasser.
Nasser crushes dorian in every other pose.

no doubt about it- Yates was given the most gifts of any mr O- the yates- weinberger-manion  friendship got Yates his sandows.

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #38 on: July 14, 2009, 10:15:03 PM »
The picture is still not a straight on and Nasser is closer to the camera.  Also, Nasser has Dorian on arms, that is it.

i agree that nasser is closer to the camera here but in this pose nasser owns dorian in arms, shoulders, chest, and, quads.. dorian owns him only in calves because dorian's are more detailed from the side than nasser's..

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #39 on: July 14, 2009, 10:20:24 PM »
lmfao at this isn't a Dorian Vs Nasser thread and that stupid as comparison at two different angles lol I love your threads they are always good for a laugh

YOU CAN NOT measure thickness in 2 dimensional photographs

i am happy my threads come to you as a comic relief after hulcher makes you cry in all D vs. R threads  ;D

The_Hammer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4423
  • President Barack Obama -- 2 Term U.S. President
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #40 on: July 14, 2009, 10:31:43 PM »
There is no Contest between Nasser & Dorian.  :-\

Nasser smokes Dorian everywhere except back  ;)

Moreover, I hardly believe that Dorian Yates is the MOST overrated bodybuilder of all time. He had been smoked by the top bodybuilders in his era such as Kevin, Flex, Shawn, & Nassir in every contest they face each other

In my BOOK, he hasn’t won any Olympia title.  

Here is what registered in my book in regard to Dorian actual history

92 He came “far” second to Kevin

93 he came second to Flex

94 last place due to missing a body part and shitty condition + huge gut (Kevin & Shawn were fighting for first & second)

95 last place due to missing a body part + having a gut (Kevin & Nassir were fighting for first & second)

96 last place due to missing a body part and having a huge gut with shitty condition (Nassir & Shawn were fighting for first & second)

97 last place due to missing a body part and for showing the most bloated\mess physique ever (Kevin & Nassir were fighting for first & second)

Too bad that politics can give out 6 Olympia titles for a bloated miss physique  :-\


Who the fuck cares what you think, little homo.

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #41 on: July 14, 2009, 10:35:41 PM »
Who the fuck cares what you think, little homo.

you yourself care since you have commeneted on what he had written ;)

The_Hammer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4423
  • President Barack Obama -- 2 Term U.S. President
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #42 on: July 14, 2009, 10:38:38 PM »
you yourself care since you have commeneted on what he had written ;)

Shut your dirty sand negro mouth.

BigBrianB

  • Time Out
  • Getbig II
  • *
  • Posts: 53
  • Boom?

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #44 on: July 14, 2009, 10:49:46 PM »
Shut your dirty sand negro mouth.

sand negro ::)

why do you hate "us"??..

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #45 on: July 14, 2009, 11:15:13 PM »

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83788
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #46 on: July 15, 2009, 01:11:36 AM »
i am happy my threads come to you as a comic relief after hulcher makes you cry in all D vs. R threads  ;D


He's funnier than you are and both of you share the same delusion and obsession both of you are the biggest Dorian fan-boys on this site

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #47 on: July 15, 2009, 01:36:13 AM »
He's funnier than you are and both of you share the same delusion and obsession both of you are the biggest Dorian fan-boys on this site

i never said i am not a dorian fan :-\ of course at his best he was great.. i attack his weak shows only.. :P

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #48 on: July 15, 2009, 06:39:32 AM »
Front and back.

Nasser is so far ahead of Yates in all areas other than the back that it more than makes up for Yates' better back.



Scary isn't it, at that particular show, Dorian isn't winning on anything in that shot, not even calves. But I suppose the back difference was even bigger. Ronnie doesn;t always dominate in front relaxed. But usually wins quads/arms something from every angle. Quite rare to see such a torn up guy place first against such a dominant guy like Nasser.

rocket

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10938
Re: Was Nasser Really Flat from the Side??..
« Reply #49 on: July 15, 2009, 07:09:40 AM »
How about this one then?

The "Dorian was thicker from the side" is just a baseless excuse the Dorian nuthuggers use to cling to their fantasy that Dorian deserved each of his Mr. O wins.  Similar baseless excuses are "There's something about Dorian that looked different in person, pictures don't do him justice."


Better comparison. 

Although it does confuse me - in the other photo dorian looked a whole lot bigger than nasser in delts, whereas this one seems to suggest the opposite.

Personally, I do not like your Nasser fever, but I'm with you on this one, he looks better.