Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: TRIX on August 25, 2009, 02:47:27 PM
-
(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/1ronnie20side20chest20e.jpg)
(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/1ronnie20back20double20.jpg)
(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/1ronnie20most20muscular.jpg)
-
Jesus we know what this thread is going to turn into ::)
98 was excellent condition but 99 and even 00 he was so much more dominant.
I thought 2005 was great too, Cutler had pretty much caught him in size but his overall look and condition blew anyone else away.
-
2001 ASC is by far Ronnie's best showing.
M!
-
2008, by far
-
that's alot of beef
-
easily 2003! :o
-
muscly negroid
-
98.
Or even 97' with better calves ;)
-
2001 ASC is by far Ronnie's best showing.
M!
Agreed.
-
easily 2003! :o
x2. Bodybuilding is the muscle
-
2008, by far
Thats because you havent seen 2009 yet.
Yip,Yip "but nobody wants to do it drug free"
-
(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/1ronnie20side20chest20e.jpg)
(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/1ronnie20back20double20.jpg)
(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/1ronnie20most20muscular.jpg)
none
-
2003
-
i didnt realise how good he looked in 2000
-
lot of work you put into this .............
now cue hulkster and ND to come in and gay this thread up in ...3...2.......1........
-
If Big Dicked Bob came in here right now and said he liked the 2009 version best every one of you punk son of a bitches would SHUT THE HELL UP and this thread would be FUCKING OVER! >:(
-
I like his 2000 Mr O + post Olympia GP shows physique the best - he was bigger, denser, thicker and freakier in 2000 than he was in 99, where he was a bit more conditioned, but a little smaller.
01 AC classic was good and his 2003 / 2004 shape had lots of muscle, but it was just lumped together and he looked awkward hitting a lot of poses like the front lat spread. And Ronnie was never good at posing anyway.
-
I like his 2000 Mr O + post Olympia GP shows physique the best - he was bigger, denser, thicker and freakier in 2000 than he was in 99, where he was a bit more conditioned, but a little smaller.
01 AC classic was good and his 2003 / 2004 shape had lots of muscle, but it was just lumped together and he looked awkward hitting a lot of poses like the front lat spread. And Ronnie was never good at posing anyway.
I agree
-
His 98-00 form is the form I like best from the above pics, with 99 being the one I lean towards.
However, in 05 when he did those Grand Prix shows weighing a reported 305 or 308, he looked just insane! He was bigger and didn't have the shape he did in 98-99, but for freakiness I think he even had his 03 form beat- when I look at them anyway.
-
2003 - just for the sheer size of him.
-
-
99 was his best overall look:
just as hard as the AC, bigger, less of a gut:
observe:
http://www.truveo.com/Ronnie-Coleman-1999-Mr-Olympia-Part-Two/id/1160132027
-
99 was his best overall look:
just as hard as the AC, bigger, less of a gut:
observe:
http://www.truveo.com/Ronnie-Coleman-1999-Mr-Olympia-Part-Two/id/1160132027
i agree that 99 may be his best overall.. of course his mm was out of the world in 2003 too!!..
-
From these pics: 2000. Best combination of size and conditioning.
-
Mr. Olympia 2004. 293lbs ripped.
-
regardless of which year was his best one thing is clear from those pics posted - no one has come remotely close to having a physique like his before, during or after his time.
-
1993 Dorian was better.
-
easily 2003! :o
I was thinking this, but decided it really wasn't. It was just the "holy crap, wrong planet Ronnie" factor. Dude stepped on stage and said "gimme mah trophay". Everyone agreed. Even Jay.
-
In 2003 he had by far the worst V-taper.
-
1993 Dorian was better.
Agreed!!
-
epic comb over on Huge Nasser! :)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=295336.0;attach=335907;image)
-
1993 Dorian was better.
In truth the keg wasn't overwhelming in the mid-90s against Coleman far before Coleman peaked, save for the wonder of IFBB politics. ;)
-
(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/1ronnie20side20chest20e.jpg)
(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/1ronnie20back20double20.jpg)
(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/1ronnie20most20muscular.jpg)
2003 I was there and he shut up all the Jay groupies who are now Martinez groupies!!!! So now Jay will shut them up.
-
Definately 2004 was the best Ronnie whipping ass right there. ;)
-
regardless of which year was his best one thing is clear from those pics posted - no one has come remotely close to having a physique like his before, during or after his time.
QFT............no one one the planet, ever, before or since has taken their body to the place ronnie did.
-
2001, but if you saw Ronnie in person in 03, he was amazing. I was lucky to see him prep for that olympia.
-
However, in 05 when he did those Grand Prix shows weighing a reported 305 or 308, he looked just insane! He was bigger and didn't have the shape he did in 98-99, but for freakiness I think he even had his 03 form beat- when I look at them anyway.
That's actually 2004 you're referring to, not 05.
-
wow.....in those pictures he is actually making Ruel look small.............no unimpressive feat
-
Conditioning looks great,..for off season guest posing. ::)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=295336.0;attach=335973;image)
-
wow.....in those pictures he is actually making Ruel look small.............no unimpressive feat
yeah, look at the difference in quad size in the side chest shot :o
not to mention arm size on the mm. insane.
-
Conditioning looks great,..for off season guest posing. ::)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=295336.0;attach=335973;image)
Thing with 2004 is that Ronnie was super dry and shredded in the press conference the day before the show, but spilled over and was holding a film of water during the prejudging and finals later on. But his vascularity and separation gave the illusion that he was conditioned (or "saved" his look), whereas someone like Jay Cutler having a similar layer of water under the skin would look totally bloated and out of shape.
-
Thing with 2004 is that Ronnie was super dry and shredded in the press conference the day before the show, but spilled over and was holding a film of water during the prejudging and finals later on
yup. I have correctly pointed this out to Flowerboy many times and he argued with me for ages about it.
stupid stupid stupid.
::)
-
yup. I have correctly pointed this out to Flowerboy many times and he argued with me for ages about it.
stupid stupid stupid.
::)
Well, if anyone would know stupid. ::)
-
Well, if anyone would know stupid. ::)
yeah, your Master Flowerboy would be the one, thats for sure..
-
yeah, your Master Flowerboy would be the one, thats for sure..
Over your head, like most things.
-
Oh my god, those 2002 pics show what happens when pro lowers the dosage... :o
-
Ronnie was only 240 in 2002 than 287 in 2003 ...? strong increase in dosage
-
I thought 2003 was the year he was 290+...?
Ronnie fanatics please clear this up - in 98...he was 257, right? 99...he was 265, right? Then how big was he in 2000, 2001, 2002? 2003 I thought he was 295, 2004...a little less? Then how much did he weigh in 2005?
1998 = 249
-
I thought 2003 was the year he was 290+...?
Ronnie fanatics please clear this up - in 98...he was 257, right? 99...he was 265, right? Then how big was he in 2000, 2001, 2002? 2003 I thought he was 295, 2004...a little less? Then how much did he weigh in 2005?
Off the top of my head,
1998 - 249 lb
1999 - 257 lb
2000 - 262 lb
2001 - 265 lb
2002 - 240 lb (trying to get in the same shape as his AC winning form of that year, where he was 248 ish)
2003 - 287 lb
2004 - 300 even
2005 - 275 lb
-
Ronnie was only 240 in 2002 than 287 in 2003 ...? strong increase in dosage
and less dieting down precontest..
same reason dorian jumped from 242 to 257 from 92 to 93.
-
2003 Olympia and 2001 Arnold Classic
-
Off the top of my head,
1998 - 249 lb
1999 - 257 lb
2000 - 262 lb
2001 - 265 lb
2002 - 240 lb (trying to get in the same shape as his AC winning form of that year, where he was 248 ish)2003 - 287 lb
2004 - 300 even
2005 - 275 lb
levrone deserved to win that year.. may be in 2000 too!!..
-
That's actually 2004 you're referring to, not 05.
Ooops. My mistake. :(
-
levrone deserved to win that year.. may be in 2000 too!!..
Not really but if you wanna try that game get in the long line behind multiple keg, columbu and dickerson "wins".
-
yeah, in 2000 Kevin got destroyed.
-
levrone deserved to win that year.. may be in 2000 too!!..
He was 296 in 2004, not 300 even.
-
If you take all that into account, ronnie was a tiny tit for most of his pro career. Genetic freak or drug increase?
-
He was 296 in 2004, not 300 even.
he was supposedly 300 pounds at some of the GP shows, where this shot was taken.
he lookes it, thats for sure:
-
the thickest back in the history of the sport to date: :o
-
Russian gp his back was outta control
-
God, noone like that now adays, thats for sure. Stomps all over any pro ever in history of the "sport"
-
Ronnie was only 240 in 2002 than 287 in 2003 ...? strong increase in dosage
Went down a lot in 2002, apparantly was insane on the BFTO vid at 275-280? dropped down because he thought he needed to get back to his 98 form and his body had changed too much for that. 2003 was just not dieting the muscle off.
If you take all that into account, ronnie was a tiny tit for most of his pro career. Genetic freak or drug increase?
He was a big guy from the beginning. He slowly got bigger. While Levrone and Ray didn't train half the year, he just kept on going and by 1998 had them in everything. Then he just kept going and had the genetics to get that big.
-
easily 2003! :o
03 by far that year was unbeatable in history so far... till heath gets bigger imo