Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 11:29:49 AM

Title: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 11:29:49 AM
 :o

no wonder people say he is from another planet:

 :o
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: affeman on September 19, 2009, 11:30:47 AM
Flower Boy will run away :o
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Alex23 on September 19, 2009, 11:31:43 AM
Great post Hulkster. People need to be reminded how high the bar was set from 1998 to 2006...
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 11:31:52 AM
Flower Boy will run away :o

no doubt.
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2009, 11:32:55 AM
:o

no wonder people say he is from another planet:

 :o

The best part about the Muscletime pics is they look absolutely NOTHING like your enhanced pics  ;D
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 11:33:49 AM
insane

look at him crushing nasser! granted, nasser was going downhill by then, but even nasser 95-7 could not stand next to this!:
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on September 19, 2009, 11:34:17 AM
Show us the side chest, side tricep, front lat spread which of course will all suck.
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: affeman on September 19, 2009, 11:34:25 AM
Honestly I think his back is not that impressive anymore by today's standards. I think Kai and Victor both have surpassed him backwise.
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 11:36:18 AM
The best part about the Muscletime pics is they look absolutely NOTHING like your enhanced pics  ;D

um. screencaps never look exactly the same as magazine photos. never have. at any contest, or of anyone. duh.

your just figuring this out now? ::)
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 11:37:36 AM
Show us the side chest, side tricep, front lat spread which of course will all suck.

lol front lat shot sucks? this looks better than Haney or Yates EVER did:
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2009, 11:38:34 AM
um. screencaps never look exactly the same as magazine photos. never have. at any contest, or of anyone. duh.

your just figuring this out now? ::)

because Kevin Horton OUTED you for using enhanced ones  ;) NO shit they're not gonna look the same duh
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 11:38:55 AM
you could drive over this back. and look at the lower back striations too :o
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 11:39:29 AM
because Kevin Horton OUTED you for using enhanced ones  ;) NO shit they're not gonna look the same duh

 ::)
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 11:41:35 AM
for all the coleman fans on this thread, here is a video from the 99 olympia prejudging.

this is the one the nuthuggers like ND claim is "faked" or "enhanced"..

 ::) ::) ::)

http://www.truveo.com/Ronnie-Coleman-1999-Mr-Olympia-Part-Two/id/1160132027

enjoy.
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Alex23 on September 19, 2009, 11:43:26 AM
for all the coleman fans on this thread, here is a video from the 99 olympia prejudging.

this is the one the nuthuggers like ND claim is "faked" or "enhanced"..

 ::) ::) ::)

http://www.truveo.com/Ronnie-Coleman-1999-Mr-Olympia-Part-Two/id/1160132027

enjoy.

LOL .. does he really claims that? I've got the VHS tape on my shelf in the living room....

LOL this is pretty sad of him ;D
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: kiwiol on September 19, 2009, 11:43:32 AM
insane

look at him crushing nasser! granted, nasser was going downhill by then, but even nasser 95-7 could not stand next to this!:

There is a pic of him standing next to Nasser, with the latter's hand resting on his shoulder - Ronnie's quad sweep is crazy in that pic compared to Nasser. I think it's been posted here several times before. You know the one I'm talking about?
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 11:45:42 AM
this one? this is one of the screenshots from the prejudging that ND claims is faked..

lol

 ::)
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: _bruce_ on September 19, 2009, 11:46:55 AM
Overall Ronnie ruled supreme - a standout bodypart doesn`t make a champ... like N-asser`s and Flex`s oilcep...
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2009, 11:47:15 AM
for all the coleman fans on this thread, here is a video from the 99 olympia prejudging.

this is the one the nuthuggers like ND claim is "faked" or "enhanced"..

 ::) ::) ::)

http://www.truveo.com/Ronnie-Coleman-1999-Mr-Olympia-Part-Two/id/1160132027

enjoy.

You have to be the biggest fucking moron on GetBig bar none !! you're posting a link to the video from the fucking guy Kevin Horton EXPOSED as tampering with the screencaps you dummy

epic Hulkster fail as usual

the enhanced screencaps look NOTHING like the video I have of that contest or the pictures
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 11:48:19 AM
LOL .. does he really claims that? I've got the VHS tape on my shelf in the living room....

LOL this is pretty sad of him ;D

yup. he claims that the person that uploaded the video enhanced the whole thing, even though they have publicly stated that they didn't.

of course, everyone with the video can see it is legit, but ND ignores this because he is stupid.

 ::)
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2009, 11:48:28 AM
this one? this is one of the screenshots from the prejudging that ND claims is faked..

lol

 ::)

LIAR alert I never claimed ALL of the screenshots were ' faked ' just certain ones YOU don't dare post again  ;D the ones Kevin Horton busted you and Bizzy using  ;)
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: kiwiol on September 19, 2009, 11:48:46 AM
this one?

That's the one. Crazy how much he brought up his legs from 98 to 99.
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 11:50:20 AM
Quote
Kevin Horton EXPOSED as tampering

yes, because Kevin said they were tampered with it must be true, even though they look the same as everyone's 99 dvd videos out there.


its a world wide global IFBB conspiracy!!!

millions of tampered DVD's around the world! god have mercy! LOL


LOL

listen to how dumb you sound.. ::)
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2009, 11:52:00 AM
yup. he claims that the person that uploaded the video enhanced the whole thing, even though they have publicly stated that they didn't.

of course, everyone with the video can see it is legit, but ND ignores this because he is stupid.

 ::)

hahahahaha lying again I never once claimed the whole thing is enhanced , Kevin Horton exposed YOU for posting enhanced pics , pics you don't dare post again for that very reason  ;)

now poor Hulkster making up lies to try and get himself away from knowingly posted worked pics
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: tendonitis on September 19, 2009, 11:52:52 AM
Ronnie looks insane there, nobody has come close to that.
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 11:53:01 AM
That's the one. Crazy how much he brought up his legs from 98 to 99.

yup. he was 15 pounds bigger in 99 with even better conditioning. especially in the quads.

this is another thing ND loves to deny because his go-to man Peter MgGough claimed ronnie was softer in 99 than in 98.

and thats all ND knows- quotes refuted by real life. ::)
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2009, 11:53:46 AM
yes, because Kevin said they were tampered with it must be true, even though they look the same as everyone's 99 dvd videos out there.


its a world wide global IFBB conspiracy!!!

millions of tampered DVD's around the world! god have mercy! LOL


LOL

listen to how dumb you sound.. ::)

yes and one of the best contest photographers in the business LIED about you using them , again moron I have the 99 Olympia and guess what my copy doesn't look like the one Bizzy's worked screenshots came from  ;D
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 11:55:08 AM
Quote
the enhanced screencaps look NOTHING like the video I have of that contest or the pictures

funny, you must have a different video than the rest of us ::).

the prejudging video and screencaps posted look the same as my VHS copy, and no doubt the DVD looks even better...
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2009, 11:56:45 AM
yup. he was 15 pounds bigger in 99 with even better conditioning. especially in the quads.

this is another thing ND loves to deny because his go-to man Peter MgGough claimed ronnie was softer in 99 than in 98.

and thats all ND knows- quotes refuted by real life. ::)


How fuck me can you get any more fucking stupid? is this even possible? first of ALL dummy he was NOT 15 pounds bigger in 99 he was 249 pounds in 1998 and 257 pounds in 1999 HOW is this 15 pounds you idiot?

Ronnie himself said on many occasions he was better conditioned in 1998 you don't fucking know what ' real life ' is unless you were there


lmfao 15 pounds bigger
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: saucetradomous on September 19, 2009, 11:58:12 AM
Would you two shut the fuck up!
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2009, 11:59:05 AM
LOL .. does he really claims that? I've got the VHS tape on my shelf in the living room....

LOL this is pretty sad of him ;D

Kevin Horton exposing Hulkster and the manipulated pics HE doesn't dare post anymore , no one is talking about the whole tape BTW  ;)
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 12:00:02 PM
How fuck me can you get any more fucking stupid? is this even possible? first of ALL dummy he was NOT 15 pounds bigger in 99 he was 249 pounds in 1998 and 257 pounds in 1999 HOW is this 15 pounds you idiot?

Ronnie himself said on many occasions he was better conditioned in 1998 you don't fucking know what ' real life ' is unless you were there


lmfao 15 pounds bigger

I suggest you take your beef up with Ronnie Coleman.

from his seminar following his 99 win:

Quote
I was almost 15 pounds heavier than last year, with a little bit better conditioning than last year.
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2009, 12:00:07 PM
15 pounds bigger in 1999 LMMFAO

Hulkster knows NOTHING
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 12:01:27 PM
15 pounds bigger in 1999 LMMFAO

Hulkster knows NOTHING

you just owned yourself buddy. Ronnie even said he was almost 15 pounds heavier.

you should just run away now before the owning continues..

http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html

Quote
I was almost 15 pounds heavier than last year, with a little bit better conditioning than last year.
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 12:02:09 PM
Ronnie knows more about Ronnie than ND and MgGough ever will.

as we see here.
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: kiwiol on September 19, 2009, 12:02:59 PM
first of ALL dummy he was NOT 15 pounds bigger in 99 he was 249 pounds in 1998 and 257 pounds in 1999 HOW is this 15 pounds you idiot?

That's true. He was 249 lb in 98 and 257 lb in 99. In fact, in the Battle for the Olympia 99 where he looks ridiculously cartoonish, he says that, "Last year I was 248, this year I'm 258 - right about 10 lb heavier" (although it was actually 8 lb).

And yes, he was drier and more conditioned in 98 compared to 99, where he was probably 95% as conditioned as the former year, but much more impressive looking cause he was bigger, fuller and had greater sweeps, not to mention no gyno.
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: affeman on September 19, 2009, 12:03:32 PM
I suggest you take your beef up with Ronnie Coleman.

from his seminar following his 99 win:


Well, Ronnie was never exactly the smartest kid in town.

He also said that being white helped Jay to defeat him (which he denied afterwards after 1000s of people have read it on prosource).
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2009, 12:04:21 PM
I suggest you take your beef up with Ronnie Coleman.

from his seminar following his 99 win:


I guess you have to take it up with Ronnie

Q ] There are those who feel you were at your best when you competed lighter, which for you was in the low 270's, and those who say you were best in the 290's. Was there a particular look you presented that you preferred over the others?
dot

      Number one. That one was incredible to me. It (Ronnie's first Olympia win in 1998) always will be and nothing will ever take the place of that one. Everything was just spot on for that show.


Ronnie is right when you want him to be and when he proves you wrong he's to be dismissed epic hypocrisy , while you're at it fan-boy take this up with Ronnie

Special Ed : Ronnie of Dorian competed in 1998 would you have smoked him?

Ronnie Coleman : NO I think he would have kept on winning as long as he competed I don't think he would have lost.


aken out of FLEX nov 1999, page 90.  interview by jim schmaltz with ronnie before the 99 Olympia.

Jim:  What would have happened last year if Dorian Yates (recently retired winner of 6 straight Mr. Olympias) had competed?


Ronnie:  Dorian would have won again.


Jim: You think so?


Ronnie:  I know so.  Dorian has a big physique - hard- and he's been the man to beat, and its hard to knock the champion off the block.  He's a big guy and has a lot going for him.


Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 12:04:44 PM
crushing the competition..
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2009, 12:05:24 PM
Ronnie knows more about Ronnie than ND and MgGough ever will.

as we see here.

Q ] There are those who feel you were at your best when you competed lighter, which for you was in the low 270's, and those who say you were best in the 290's. Was there a particular look you presented that you preferred over the others?
dot

      Number one. That one was incredible to me. It (Ronnie's first Olympia win in 1998) always will be and nothing will ever take the place of that one. Everything was just spot on for that show.

Ronnie is right when you want him to be and when he proves you wrong he's to be dismissed epic hypocrisy , while you're at it fan-boy take this up with Ronnie

Special Ed : Ronnie of Dorian competed in 1998 would you have smoked him?

Ronnie Coleman : NO I think he would have kept on winning as long as he competed I don't think he would have lost.


aken out of FLEX nov 1999, page 90.  interview by jim schmaltz with ronnie before the 99 Olympia.

Jim:  What would have happened last year if Dorian Yates (recently retired winner of 6 straight Mr. Olympias) had competed?


Ronnie:  Dorian would have won again.


Jim: You think so?


Ronnie:  I know so.  Dorian has a big physique - hard- and he's been the man to beat, and its hard to knock the champion off the block.  He's a big guy and has a lot going for him.


OWNED fucking idiot  ;D  ;)
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 12:06:18 PM
this is why ND gets so worked up over these threads:

its not even close and he knows it:
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: affeman on September 19, 2009, 12:08:11 PM
Anyone else thinks Cormiers Lat-Spread crushes Ronnies??

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=298445.0;attach=339720;image)
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2009, 12:08:33 PM
this is why ND gets so worked up over these threads:

its not even close and he knows it.

Ronnie knows Ronnie better than McGough

Q ] There are those who feel you were at your best when you competed lighter, which for you was in the low 270's, and those who say you were best in the 290's. Was there a particular look you presented that you preferred over the others?
dot

      Number one. That one was incredible to me. It (Ronnie's first Olympia win in 1998) always will be and nothing will ever take the place of that one. Everything was just spot on for that show.

Ronnie is right when you want him to be and when he proves you wrong he's to be dismissed epic hypocrisy , while you're at it fan-boy take this up with Ronnie

Special Ed : Ronnie of Dorian competed in 1998 would you have smoked him?

Ronnie Coleman : NO I think he would have kept on winning as long as he competed I don't think he would have lost.


aken out of FLEX nov 1999, page 90.  interview by jim schmaltz with ronnie before the 99 Olympia.

Jim:  What would have happened last year if Dorian Yates (recently retired winner of 6 straight Mr. Olympias) had competed?


Ronnie:  Dorian would have won again.


Jim: You think so?


Ronnie:  I know so.  Dorian has a big physique - hard- and he's been the man to beat, and its hard to knock the champion off the block.  He's a big guy and has a lot going for him.


you just played yourself jackass and that quote is from the 1999 Mr Olympia  ;D
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 12:09:23 PM
Anyone else thinks Cormiers Lat-Spread crushes Ronnies??

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=298445.0;attach=339720;image)

no. 8)
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2009, 12:09:25 PM
Anyone else thinks Cormiers Lat-Spread crushes Ronnies??

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=298445.0;attach=339720;image)

Crushes? NO is giving him one hell of a run for his money absolutely
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: kiwiol on September 19, 2009, 12:09:28 PM


Check this out, Hulkster (sure you've seen it heaps of times before ;D) - Last year I was 248, this year I'm 258, so right about 10 lb
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 12:10:23 PM
Crushes? NO is giving him one hell of a run for his money absolutely

chris owned Flex in 99, but flex got by on name alone.
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2009, 12:10:30 PM
That's true. He was 249 lb in 98 and 257 lb in 99. In fact, in the Battle for the Olympia 99 where he looks ridiculously cartoonish, he says that, "Last year I was 248, this year I'm 258 - right about 10 lb heavier" (although it was actually 8 lb).

And yes, he was drier and more conditioned in 98 compared to 99, where he was probably 95% as conditioned as the former year, but much more impressive looking cause he was bigger, fuller and had greater sweeps, not to mention no gyno.

Oppppssssss Hulkster sorry but FAIL as usual

Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2009, 12:11:55 PM


Check this out, Hulkster (sure you've seen it heaps of times before ;D) - Last year I was 248, this year I'm 258, so right about 10 lb

LMMFAO Hulkster getting a beat down almost as bad as his fat buddy pumpster lol

Hulkster 15 pounds huh? lmmfao

Hulkster the moron owned as usual by his own hero  ;D
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 12:18:48 PM
its no secret why ND is so bitter: ;D
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 12:19:22 PM
^
hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahaha
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2009, 12:20:12 PM
Sometimes I almost feel bad for Hulkster lol he tries so hard and always ends up getting his ass kicked by Ronnie himself lol that's the sweetest lol

Ronnie knows Ronnie better than McGough LMMFAO

Q ] There are those who feel you were at your best when you competed lighter, which for you was in the low 270's, and those who say you were best in the 290's. Was there a particular look you presented that you preferred over the others?
dot

      Number one. That one was incredible to me. It (Ronnie's first Olympia win in 1998) always will be and nothing will ever take the place of that one. Everything was just spot on for that show.

Ronnie is right when you want him to be and when he proves you wrong he's to be dismissed epic hypocrisy , while you're at it fan-boy take this up with Ronnie

Special Ed : Ronnie of Dorian competed in 1998 would you have smoked him?

Ronnie Coleman : NO I think he would have kept on winning as long as he competed I don't think he would have lost.


aken out of FLEX nov 1999, page 90.  interview by jim schmaltz with ronnie before the 99 Olympia.

Jim:  What would have happened last year if Dorian Yates (recently retired winner of 6 straight Mr. Olympias) had competed?


Ronnie:  Dorian would have won again.


Jim: You think so?


Ronnie:  I know so.  Dorian has a big physique - hard- and he's been the man to beat, and its hard to knock the champion off the block.  He's a big guy and has a lot going for him.




I really do enjoy kicking his stupid ass in every thread , hey I gave him a chance to call a truce he declined LMMFAO



Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2009, 12:26:39 PM
its no secret why ND is so bitter: ;D

Hahahahahah Hulkster is melting down hard , dude I fucking OWN you  ;) two of Team Coleman's biggest ball lickers have been crushed in the last 24 hours hahahahaha
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: hench on September 19, 2009, 03:50:40 PM
I think so too, his entire inner back looks thicker. and easily just as wide.

Anyone else thinks Cormiers Lat-Spread crushes Ronnies??

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=298445.0;attach=339720;image)
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 04:34:39 PM
ronnie was so good in 99 even his much attacked triceps were amazing.

shredded to all hell: :o

so much for being softer in 99 LOL ::)
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2009, 04:38:46 PM
ronnie was so good in 99 even his much attacked triceps were amazing.

shredded to all hell: :o

so much for being softer in 99 LOL ::)

A) people can have striations under a layer of water B) people hold water and sq fat else where C) is side triceps shot sucked anyway
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 04:40:46 PM
D) people will come up with a list of excuses when reality proves them to be wrong..

 ::)
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2009, 04:42:23 PM
ronnie was in a league of his own :o

so far ahead
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 21, 2009, 01:56:22 PM
even though the flash washes out the pic, this bi shot is incredible.

look at the tiny waist, the wide lats, the crazy cut arms, the quad sweep etc.

Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Earl1972 on September 21, 2009, 08:44:15 PM
:o

no wonder people say he is from another planet:

 :o

would you prefer him to be from your bedroom :-X

E
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Rinc on September 21, 2009, 09:10:47 PM
Ronnie owns Dorian, no doubt.
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Immortal_Technique on September 22, 2009, 03:27:52 AM
Sometimes I almost feel bad for Hulkster lol he tries so hard and always ends up getting his ass kicked by Ronnie himself lol that's the sweetest lol

Ronnie knows Ronnie better than McGough LMMFAO

Q ] There are those who feel you were at your best when you competed lighter, which for you was in the low 270's, and those who say you were best in the 290's. Was there a particular look you presented that you preferred over the others?
dot

      Number one. That one was incredible to me. It (Ronnie's first Olympia win in 1998) always will be and nothing will ever take the place of that one. Everything was just spot on for that show.

Ronnie is right when you want him to be and when he proves you wrong he's to be dismissed epic hypocrisy , while you're at it fan-boy take this up with Ronnie

Special Ed : Ronnie of Dorian competed in 1998 would you have smoked him?

Ronnie Coleman : NO I think he would have kept on winning as long as he competed I don't think he would have lost.


aken out of FLEX nov 1999, page 90.  interview by jim schmaltz with ronnie before the 99 Olympia.

Jim:  What would have happened last year if Dorian Yates (recently retired winner of 6 straight Mr. Olympias) had competed?


Ronnie:  Dorian would have won again.


Jim: You think so?


Ronnie:  I know so.  Dorian has a big physique - hard- and he's been the man to beat, and its hard to knock the champion off the block.  He's a big guy and has a lot going for him.




I really do enjoy kicking his stupid ass in every thread , hey I gave him a chance to call a truce he declined LMMFAO





Constantly amusing how you deride Ronnie, then rely heavily on his words at times like these.

We all know Dorian said something to similar effect in the MD Ronnie-special a couple of years back, although it's damn hard to find anywhere on the net, but I remember it well. He said 2003 Ronnie would "probably win" again him at his best, as he was just too big. Something I happen to agree with.

Now you could argue this is modesty on Dorian's part under the circumstances of being interviewed for a Ronnie special article. You could also say Ronnie's words on Dorian are similarly affected to appear respectful of a great and recent champ. You laugh at this postulation, even when presented with the interview in which he said Arnold, Haney et al would beat him too. Quite absurd.




Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 22, 2009, 03:37:36 AM
Ronnie owns Dorian, no doubt.

there is doubt if you don't have any clue how the sport works, like Flowerboy and his bitches... :-\
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: toty21 on September 22, 2009, 03:54:10 AM
Although bodybuilding has its experts (judges). I think it is still a game of visuals...that is why I hear on this website how Dorian compares to Ronnie, etc...and honestly when looked at a single glance, they are not EVEN in the same league. Dorian looks like a construction worker (wide torso with no arms, at least when compared to his torso) that just happens to bodybuild as a hobby....however Ronnie looks plain and simple like a warped up super hero from the cartoons....he looks unreal.
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: sculpture on September 22, 2009, 08:03:43 AM
once again nitpicking over the minor details

weights are hard to be verified at the best of times and these guys can fluctuate by 5-10 lbs in one day

7, 8 or 15lbs heavier it doesnt matter, what does is that ronnie on the day presented a physique unmatched.
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 22, 2009, 01:30:39 PM
Constantly amusing how you deride Ronnie, then rely heavily on his words at times like these.

We all know Dorian said something to similar effect in the MD Ronnie-special a couple of years back, although it's damn hard to find anywhere on the net, but I remember it well. He said 2003 Ronnie would "probably win" again him at his best, as he was just too big. Something I happen to agree with.

Now you could argue this is modesty on Dorian's part under the circumstances of being interviewed for a Ronnie special article. You could also say Ronnie's words on Dorian are similarly affected to appear respectful of a great and recent champ. You laugh at this postulation, even when presented with the interview in which he said Arnold, Haney et al would beat him too. Quite absurd.






Quote
Constantly amusing how you deride Ronnie, then rely heavily on his words at times like these.

We all know Dorian said something to similar effect in the MD Ronnie-special a couple of years back, although it's damn hard to find anywhere on the net, but I remember it well. He said 2003 Ronnie would "probably win" again him at his best, as he was just too big. Something I happen to agree with.

Deride Ronnie? when I'm typing 1/5th the bullshit Hulkster does about Dorian then you can claim I ' deride ' Ronnie

I don't rely heavily on his words in fact I've said on many occasions just because Ronnie says it's so doesn't mean it is but it's always interesting the lengths the Ronnie apologists go to try and interpret what he was saying of flat-out say he's just stupid and this is coming from Coleman fans yet ironically you don't have any problem with them saying it  ;)

And that was posted because Hulkster specifically stated Ronnie knows Ronnie better than McGough knows Ronnie , it was me point out his hypocrisy by dismissing Ronnie's pro-Yates quotes and then needing Ronnie's opinion posting as a refute to McGoughs either way he's an idiot and a hypocrite

Dorian was NEVER definitive on what he said and he said Ronnie would probably win ( and a very important part you guys always try to omit ) " I guess I don't know " one it doesn't make it so ( in both cases ) and two it's not definitive , not like Ronnie's multiple admissions he wouldn't beat Dorian

Quote
Now you could argue this is modesty on Dorian's part under the circumstances of being interviewed for a Ronnie special article. You could also say Ronnie's words on Dorian are similarly affected to appear respectful of a great and recent champ. You laugh at this postulation, even when presented with the interview in which he said Arnold, Haney et al would beat him too. Quite absurd.

I wont try and argue anything he said Ronnie would probably beat me I guess I don't know it would be up to the judges as always and many times he's been ask this very question and the one time he sorta reflected on it but never really committed to a definitive answer like Ronnie , probably due to the fact that Dorian beat Ronnie eight times to none so it's easy for Ronnie to answer and harder for Dorian because he was only beaten by two people , although he said he thought Flex was the only guy who could give him ' trouble ' during his reign and I'm sure he felt Ronnie could as well during his

Here is Dorian when posed with that question which he never gave an answer

4. A lot of people say that you are the only pro bodybuilder that could go head to head with Ronnie Coleman.  Like him, you were the only other to be able to gain so much mass in one year. What are your thoughts on this?


A. I get asked that question all the time, and I can’t really give an answer.  I have actually beaten Ronnie, but then he wasn’t at the stage he is now.  He is probably carrying more muscle than I did, but I feel I had better conditioning than him.  It would be close but that’s down to the judge’s decision as always.  All the things that we have in common – Lee Haney, Ronnie Coleman and myself – is that we are all stable mentally, training hard, not messing around partying.  You have to keep the focus and it’s usually the mind that is the deciding factor, over physical capabilities.


but I always love guys trying to reduce Ronnie's words on the subject because it flat-out contradicts their opinions on the topic
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 22, 2009, 01:32:24 PM
there is doubt if you don't have any clue how the sport works, like Flowerboy and his bitches... :-\

Ronnie knows how the sport works and he feels Dorian would beat HIM again and again and again so include your own hero in my band of bitches  ;)
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 22, 2009, 01:34:30 PM
Although bodybuilding has its experts (judges). I think it is still a game of visuals...that is why I hear on this website how Dorian compares to Ronnie, etc...and honestly when looked at a single glance, they are not EVEN in the same league. Dorian looks like a construction worker (wide torso with no arms, at least when compared to his torso) that just happens to bodybuild as a hobby....however Ronnie looks plain and simple like a warped up super hero from the cartoons....he looks unreal.

well said! read carefully nuthuggers!
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 22, 2009, 01:40:43 PM
once again nitpicking over the minor details

weights are hard to be verified at the best of times and these guys can fluctuate by 5-10 lbs in one day

7, 8 or 15lbs heavier it doesnt matter, what does is that ronnie on the day presented a physique unmatched.

weights are hard to be verified? NOT stepping on a scale involves no effort and easily verified , weight may fluctuate muscle doesn't because it's so hard to gain

7/8 or 15 pounds don't matter? yeah it does especially if it's muscle there is a huge difference between an increase of dense muscle & water & fat and the physique he displayed was unmatched ? in what context? seeing Ronnie is an individual no shit it's not going to be matched unless he had a twin , but as far as a man around 5'10" 5'11" being 257 pounds in contest shape it's more than been matched in year earlier in fact Dorian was 257 pounds in better condition with better balance & proportion and that's 257 pounds of dense muscle sans almost all fat & water

Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 22, 2009, 01:41:42 PM
ever notice how ND's posts are nothing but quotes and words? they have no substance at all.

he runs from visuals, and its no secret why:
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: hench on September 22, 2009, 02:07:52 PM
I wish bodyweights of the competitors wasnt known, it really means bugger all, everyone has different genetics, different structures and bone size etc etc
Ronnie's physique couldnt handle being such a high bodyweight without getting droopy tits, alien abs and a giant arse, he looked like a blob of shit balanced on two toothpicks. so i dunno which is better, that or a construction worker with small arms
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: sculpture on September 22, 2009, 02:33:28 PM
weights are hard to be verified? NOT stepping on a scale involves no effort and easily verified , weight may fluctuate muscle doesn't because it's so hard to gain

7/8 or 15 pounds don't matter? yeah it does especially if it's muscle there is a huge difference between an increase of dense muscle & water & fat and the physique he displayed was unmatched ? in what context? seeing Ronnie is an individual no shit it's not going to be matched unless he had a twin , but as far as a man around 5'10" 5'11" being 257 pounds in contest shape it's more than been matched in year earlier in fact Dorian was 257 pounds in better condition with better balance & proportion and that's 257 pounds of dense muscle sans almost all fat & water



still goin on about dorian ey?


shame dorians 257 looks like shit compared to ronnies
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 22, 2009, 02:40:36 PM
Quote
shame dorians 257 looks like shit compared to ronnies
 
 

true true

its all about the genetics.

both the same size

but one has the tiny waist, full muscle bellies and cuts/striations to spare.

the other looks like a construction worker who does bodybuilding on the side..
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 22, 2009, 03:40:31 PM
still goin on about dorian ey?


shame dorians 257 looks like shit compared to ronnies


Oh so your main concern when judging a physique is if it's prettier than another , gotcha  :)


yes the aesthetic masterpiece known as Ronnie Coleman lol hahahahahahaha saying Ronnie is more aesthetic than Dorian is like saying Humvee is better looking than F350 NEITHER is a Ferrari

and aesthetic count for what in contests? for what? Flex Wheeler leaves Coleman for dead in the aesthetics department and Dorian destroyed him , you're another guy who bases everything on looks and can not look beyond your own personal preference when evaluating physique a common theme among Coleman fans , which is all good but don't speak on the topic until you learn how the game is played
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 22, 2009, 03:46:36 PM
true true

its all about the genetics.

both the same size

but one has the tiny waist, full muscle bellies and cuts/striations to spare.

the other looks like a construction worker who does bodybuilding on the side..

NO both aren't the same size , one is 257 pounds dry as a dessert and hard as nails and the other isn't , one has outstanding muscle balance & proportion and the other doesn't one is more complete than the other and one beat the other 8 times  ;)
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: haider on September 22, 2009, 03:50:10 PM
would you prefer him to be from your bedroom :-X

E
Hypothetical question: Levrone slips into your room wearing only a posing thong, pumped up with 3 nice coats of tanning lotion on. What does Earl do about this rude gesture?
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 22, 2009, 03:58:10 PM
first thing he does is gently remove the socks stuffed in Kevin's trunks.. :-X
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Earl1972 on September 22, 2009, 03:59:42 PM
Hypothetical question: Levrone slips into your room wearing only a posing thong, pumped up with 3 nice coats of tanning lotion on. What does Earl do about this rude gesture?

strange question from a creepy guy that appears to suddenly be obsessed with me :-X

E
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 22, 2009, 04:00:53 PM
first thing he does is gently remove the socks stuffed in Kevin's trunks.. :-X

Your mouth is ready  ;)
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Earl1972 on September 22, 2009, 04:01:28 PM
first thing he does is gently remove the socks stuffed in Kevin's trunks.. :-X

more stange thoughts from a "guy" that loves him some ebony mounains of muscle :P

E
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: haider on September 22, 2009, 04:05:45 PM
first thing he does is gently remove the socks stuffed in Kevin's trunks.. :-X
does he act surprised when he finds there is no sock?  ;D
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 22, 2009, 04:05:53 PM
its funny how you keep saying dorian is 'harder and dryer' when he clearly is not.

ronnie is dry and supersliced in 99
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 22, 2009, 04:08:35 PM
its funny how you keep saying dorian is 'harder and dryer' when he clearly is not.

ronnie is dry and supersliced in 99

Let me try this Hulkster bullshit  ;D

wow one of these guys are dry & hard and one isn't pics don't lie blah , blah , blah

Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 22, 2009, 04:14:45 PM
nice try ND, but you can't escape Ronnie 99 no matter how hard you try:
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: haider on September 22, 2009, 04:16:24 PM
not this shit again  >:(

knock it off guys  >:(
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 22, 2009, 04:23:42 PM
nice try ND, but you can't escape Ronnie 99 no matter how hard you try:


can't escape how Dorian makes him look soft ? and unbalanced and incomplete?  ;D
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 22, 2009, 04:40:30 PM
you  know ND is desperate when he breaks out the blurry screenshots again.. ::)
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 22, 2009, 04:42:49 PM
you  know ND is desperate when he breaks out the blurry screenshots again.. ::)

PIC & VIDEO DON"T LIE  ;D and you know you're desperate when you're crying because it shows how soft & lacking Ronnie is compared to Dorian
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Earl1972 on September 22, 2009, 04:46:23 PM
hulkster must be gay for ronnie

why would him of all people assume that I'm attracted to Mr. Levrone?

E
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 22, 2009, 04:48:18 PM
hulkster must be guy for ronnie

why would him of all people assume that I'm attracted to Mr. Levrone?

E

It's called projection , he's projecting how he feels about Ronnie onto you . What's funny is Kevin Horton had to remind Hulkster on more than one occasions Ronnie was happily married and straight  ;D
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 22, 2009, 04:49:12 PM
hulkster must be guy for ronnie

why would him of all people assume that I'm attracted to Mr. Levrone?

E

well, you refer to him as "Mr. Levrone" for starters

sort of a sub/master type thing I guess... :-X
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 22, 2009, 04:51:20 PM
well, you refer to him as "Mr. Levrone" for starters

sort of a sub/master type thing I guess... :-X

Oh you don't guess anything you have it all planed out
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Earl1972 on September 22, 2009, 04:51:57 PM
well, you refer to him as "Mr. Levrone" for starters

sort of a sub/master type thing I guess... :-X

it's called respect

something you would never get, you have to be mentally ill to post the same pics over and over again for years :-X

E
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Earl1972 on September 22, 2009, 04:52:45 PM
It's called projection , he's projecting how he feels about Ronnie onto you . What's funny is Kevin Horton had to remind Hulkster on more than one occasions Ronnie was happily married and straight  ;D

exactly

E
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 22, 2009, 05:06:08 PM
and I had to remind Kevin Horton that he ran away rather than admit he was wrong :P
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 22, 2009, 05:12:40 PM
and I had to remind Kevin Horton that he ran away rather than admit he was wrong :P


yeah like I ran away too yet here I am in yet another thread correcting you  ;)

you think if you type I ran away from you it makes it true? you think anyone believe it for a minute? you're only fooling yourself , everybody knows you're a liar and an idiot
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: haider on September 22, 2009, 05:16:19 PM
hulkster must be gay for ronnie

why would him of all people assume that I'm attracted to Mr. Levrone?

E
u fucker I had set it up perfectly for you with my question to start a Levrone series that would dominate the "Branch Warren Sequence" thread  >:( >:( 



All you had to do was answer my question honestly  ;D
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Topskin69 on September 22, 2009, 05:38:23 PM

There is a better chance of seeing peace in the middle east, then seeing the two of you work this out.

Am I the only one that is ready to bankroll a trip for ND to fly to Canada and straighten this out. The epic peace summit awaits!

M!
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 22, 2009, 05:43:17 PM
There is a better chance of seeing peace in the middle east, then seeing the two of you work this out.

Am I the only one that is ready to bankroll a trip for ND to fly to Canada and straighten this out. The epic peace summit awaits!

M!

there is nothing to work out , Ronnie admitted he wouldn't beat Dorian case closed. Hulkster is just a nitter angry loser following me around trolling & spamming
Title: Re: 99 Ronnie Coleman - unbelievable
Post by: Hulkster on September 22, 2009, 06:17:33 PM
whats funny is that ND is the only person who fails to see the allusion to the politics that was dorian's reign in Ronnie's comment.

because everyone can see that in terms of physique, dorian is way behind.

but then, dorian was often behind during his post tear olympia wins, yet won anyway.

hence ronnie's comment.

way way behind: 8)