Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: James Phoenix on December 17, 2009, 04:38:59 AM

Title: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: James Phoenix on December 17, 2009, 04:38:59 AM
It seems like there was "before Arnold" and after...
I'm not just talking about Arnold's status as an ambassador for the sport; I'm talking about his physique.
He was the first guy to present something that actually holds up to contemporary bodybuilders.
The distance (physique-wise) between him and Reeves is just tremendous.
Definitely ahead of his time.
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: MORTALCOIL on December 17, 2009, 04:47:11 AM
No, Sergio was first. The difference between him and Larry Scott determined the birth of modern Bbing. But if you think Arnold could hold his own against contemporary Bbers, I think you're sadly mistaken; put him at his best on a stage and he wouldn't even get his pro-card nowadays. Standards have changed drastically.
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: 240 is Back on December 17, 2009, 04:50:21 AM
if arnold had today's 'sports nutrition', he'd be gunter schkerkamp.

and, since he would be so marketable, they would change judging criteria so that he won every year.
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: James Phoenix on December 17, 2009, 04:51:01 AM
No, Sergio was first. The difference between him and Larry Scott determined the birth of modern Bbing. But if you think Arnold could hold his own against contemporary Bbers, I think you're sadly mistaken; put him at his best on a stage and he wouldn't even get his pro-card nowadays. Standards have changed drastically.

Really? I mean, wasn't Sergio mostly just arms? Didn't Arnie beat him almost every time they went head-on?
It just seems like Arnold was far more well-rounded. I could be wrong.

Sure, Arnie wouldn't look as big as contemporary bodybuilders, however, I think that's primarily due to his legs.
He wouldn't look "dwarfed" is what I'm saying; Reeves would look dwarfed. I think Arnold not getting a pro-card to day is hyperbole.
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: nolotil on December 17, 2009, 04:56:50 AM
Really? I mean, wasn't Sergio mostly just arms? Didn't Arnie beat him almost every time they went head-on?
It just seems like Arnold was far more well-rounded. I could be wrong.

Sure, Arnie wouldn't look as big as contemporary bodybuilders, however, I think that's primarily due to his legs.
He wouldn't look "dwarfed" is what I'm saying; Reeves would look dwarfed. I think Arnold not getting a pro-card to day is hyperbole.

no sergio beat arnold at the 69 (xxx) mr olympia. i would say oliva was the first modern bodybuilder.
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: MORTALCOIL on December 17, 2009, 04:59:29 AM
Really? I mean, wasn't Sergio mostly just arms? Didn't Arnie beat him almost every time they went head-on?
It just seems like Arnold was far more well-rounded. I could be wrong.

Sure, Arnie wouldn't look as big as contemporary bodybuilders, however, I think that's primarily due to his legs.
He wouldn't look "dwarfed" is what I'm saying; Reeves would look dwarfed. I think Arnold not getting a pro-card to day is hyperbole.

No, Sergio had actually a very good back and better legs than Arnold (except maybe for the '73 Arnold who brought them up). Many think he should have won in '72. He just never achieved great conditioning. Arnold had a good back but not fantastic (look at Robby Robinson for a great back at that time period) also but he was all arms and chest, his delts weren't nearly as good as the rest of his upper front, midSEction was fine but Nubret had him on that most of the time.
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: io856 on December 17, 2009, 05:23:50 AM
if arnold had today's 'sports nutrition', he'd be gunter schkerkamp.

and, since he would be so marketable, they would change judging criteria so that he won every year.
thats not sports nutrition
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: Tapeworm on December 17, 2009, 05:31:07 AM
It's egger.  You can write it.  It's not a dirty word.

Sch
war
zen
egger
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: bigkid on December 17, 2009, 05:32:53 AM
The first of the modern bodybuilders is Dorian Yates.
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: hipolito mejia on December 17, 2009, 05:33:08 AM
Really? I mean, wasn't Sergio mostly just arms? Didn't Arnie beat him almost every time they went head-on?
It just seems like Arnold was far more well-rounded. I could be wrong.



If you go back to where Sergio was standing, Sergio was the best bodybuilder in the world while the Mr.Olympia contest was just a new project (2 year old competition)  a "try out" to have an stablished tittle like Mr.America or Mr.Universe.......would it make sense to put up with Joe W. crap to be the poster boy of his products?..when you allready have more crediblity than the tittle itself?

Sergio a 3 times champ lost to Arnold fairly in 70' then was disrespected in 71 and 72 forced to walk away from Weider's IFBB while Arnold a one time winner (70) became everything  the IFBB had to offer.
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: MORTALCOIL on December 17, 2009, 05:35:34 AM
If you go back to where Sergio was standing, Sergio was the best bodybuilder in the world while the Mr.Olympia contest was just a new project (2 year old competition)  a "try out" to have an stablished tittle like Mr.America or Mr.Universe.......would it make sense to put up with Joe W. crap to be the poster boy of his products?..when you allready have more crediblity than the tittle itself?

Sergio a 3 times champ lost to Arnold fairly in 70' then was disrespected in 71 and 72 forced to walk away from Weider's IFBB while Arnold a one time winner (70) became everything  the IFBB had to offer.

QFT.
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: Parker on December 17, 2009, 06:35:30 AM
if arnold had today's 'sports nutrition', he'd be gunter schkerkamp.

and, since he would be so marketable, they would change judging criteria so that he won every year.

I alawys said that. Aenold had a wide waist...he even stated that. Gunter had a wide waist as well. I had ve to say it was equally Sergio, Arnold, and Nubret that ushered in "modern bodybuilding"
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: JasonH on December 17, 2009, 06:36:26 AM
What difference does it make to be considered the first "modern" bodybuilder anyway?

How do you define modern?

Haney was more modern than Arnold, Dorian was more modern than Haney, and Ronnie was more modern than Dorian. Different eras, but it's still bodybuilding.
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: Tapeworm on December 17, 2009, 06:36:49 AM
I alawys said that. Aenold had a wide waist...he even stated that. Gunter had a wide waist as well. I had ve to say it was equally Sergio, Arnold, and Nubret that ushered in "modern bodybuilding"

Little tipsy tonight eh?
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: jaejonna on December 17, 2009, 06:40:55 AM
Arnold in 1974 wouldnt get a pro-card ??? hahahha your fuckin stoopid....
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: Parker on December 17, 2009, 06:47:18 AM
Little tipsy tonight eh?
Huh...
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: Meso_z on December 17, 2009, 07:16:54 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=310920.0;attach=351344;image)
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: Pollux on December 17, 2009, 07:17:34 AM
I'm gonna put this to rest by saying Arnold had the GREATEST physique ever. You don't get the IFBB Gold Order as being the BEST bodybuilder of the 20th century for nothing. :)
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: Tapeworm on December 17, 2009, 08:12:37 AM
Huh...

Your penmanship is usually outstanding.  And the 'I alaways saidzzat!!"  I got a little JD vibe off ya.  ;D
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: Parker on December 17, 2009, 08:25:10 AM
Your penmanship is usually outstanding.  And the 'I alaways saidzzat!!"  I got a little JD vibe off ya.  ;D

Oh, actually I'm typing with no contacts/glasses. My face is like 2 inches from the screen.
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: Mars on December 17, 2009, 08:37:42 AM
(http://www.timesonline.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00166/Bodybuilder-185_166313a.jpg)
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: Pecs on December 17, 2009, 08:43:28 AM
where would prime arnie place in the 2009 mr o??
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: uberman09 on December 17, 2009, 09:01:37 AM
ahnold was one of the first and most succesful ... old gay men's bitch.

Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on December 17, 2009, 09:24:57 AM
Arnold in 1974 wouldnt get a pro-card ??? hahahha your fuckin stoopid....

See how skinny he was.  :-X
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: kiwiol on December 17, 2009, 09:32:45 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=310920.0;attach=351344;image)

Are you saying he makes the guy from Twilight look like Conan the barbarian?
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: Method101 on December 17, 2009, 09:41:54 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=310920.0;attach=351344;image)
thats james phoenix.
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: BIG AL MCKECHNIE on December 17, 2009, 01:24:06 PM
I think Larry Scott was the first bodybuilder with "modern" amounts of unnatural muscle mass. He was the first Dianabol built champion.
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: BIG AL MCKECHNIE on December 17, 2009, 01:29:22 PM
Freddy Ortiz was the second dianabol man.
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: BIG AL MCKECHNIE on December 17, 2009, 01:32:33 PM
Sergio wasn't too freaky at first.
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: Dreadlifter on December 17, 2009, 02:38:52 PM
Big Al is right in saying Scott was the first modern type in terms of muscle mass.

I view Schwarzenegger as the first modern bodybuilder in that he was willing to pop as much of every pill and potion going as he could/had to to get on top of the competition.
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: Deadpool on December 17, 2009, 03:13:18 PM
isn't james phoenix dead of  a drug overdose, or was that his brother?
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: James Phoenix on December 18, 2009, 02:19:04 AM
Lol.

"Rumors of my demise have been greatly exaggerated".

It's interesting to see the difference in physiques altered by d-bol.

Whatever guys were using before (if anything) must have been much less potent.

I guess d-bol is the literal modern body-builder.

Otherwise it seems like most people think Sergio edges out Arnold.

I don't agree. Based on this pic, Sergio looks disproportionate and undefined. Modern? Perhaps.
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: Tombo on December 18, 2009, 02:25:20 AM
See how skinny he was.  :-X

6 foot 240 pounds hahaha yeah thats small by todays standards

yeah fucking right

let the (warranted) arnie worshipping begin
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: James Phoenix on December 18, 2009, 03:40:49 AM
This is still an incredible pic in the era of Dorian, Jay, and Ronnie:


Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: Meso_z on December 18, 2009, 04:14:05 AM
This is still an incredible pic in the era of Dorian, Jay, and Ronnie:




still cant beat this.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=310920.0;attach=351344;image)
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: James Phoenix on December 18, 2009, 04:22:52 AM
still cant beat this.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=310920.0;attach=351344;image)

My cross-dressing pic can!
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: no one on December 18, 2009, 04:54:22 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=310920.0;attach=351344;image)

who the fuck is that gearbox?
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: MORTALCOIL on December 18, 2009, 06:47:11 AM
Lol.

"Rumors of my demise have been greatly exaggerated".

It's interesting to see the difference in physiques altered by d-bol.

Whatever guys were using before (if anything) must have been much less potent.

I guess d-bol is the literal modern body-builder.

Otherwise it seems like most people think Sergio edges out Arnold.

I don't agree. Based on this pic, Sergio looks disproportionate and undefined. Modern? Perhaps.

Actually on that pic, you can clearly see that Sergio is wider though smaller, taper is slightlymore pronounced, his triceps are better than Arnold'sas his forearms, Arnold has him on biceps definition but Sergio has the peak (though I think that's just that particaular picture as Arnold had a great biceps peak), SSergio's thighs are fuller, rounder bellies tight there, calves are Arnold's. Do the math.
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: James Phoenix on December 19, 2009, 08:16:19 AM
Actually on that pic, you can clearly see that Sergio is wider though smaller, taper is slightlymore pronounced, his triceps are better than Arnold'sas his forearms, Arnold has him on biceps definition but Sergio has the peak (though I think that's just that particaular picture as Arnold had a great biceps peak), SSergio's thighs are fuller, rounder bellies tight there, calves are Arnold's. Do the math.

He (Sergio) is also smaller and less imposing, lacks definition, and despite having a greater taper at the waste, looks 'thrown together' overall.
He's a collection of parts like Ronnie Coleman. There's no flow to his physique at all.
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: nolotil on December 19, 2009, 11:10:59 AM
freddy ortiz had a really cool physique although he hardly trained legs  ;D

freddy loved doing dips...he had great arms..specially triceps
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: Hulkotron on December 19, 2009, 11:26:03 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=310920.0;attach=351344;image)

Who is this savage beat Meso_z?
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: Danimal77 on December 19, 2009, 07:09:46 PM
if arnold had today's 'sports nutrition', he'd be gunter schkerkamp.

and, since he would be so marketable, they would change judging criteria so that he won every year.

That's complete and utter bullshit. COMPLETELY DIFFERENT STRUCTURE and muscle bellies. Such an ignorant comment to make. Arnold was one of the greatest of all time. Gunter was not in Arnold's league and no, I am not an Arnold fanboy.
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: Danimal77 on December 19, 2009, 07:19:43 PM
isn't james phoenix dead of  a drug overdose, or was that his brother?

Shhhhhhhhh, I hear he recovered from the massive blood loss after he slit his wrists and cut through a major artery. You don't want him to cut himself again, do you?  ;D
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: Danimal77 on December 19, 2009, 07:21:24 PM
6 foot 240 pounds hahaha yeah thats small by todays standards

yeah fucking right

let the (warranted) arnie worshipping begin

6'1" and if he had legs he would have been 260 pounds in competition and 280 pounds offseason.
Title: Re: Is Arnold Schwarzen*gger the first "Modern Bodybuilder"?
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on December 19, 2009, 07:47:19 PM
6 foot 240 pounds hahaha yeah thats small by todays standards

yeah fucking right

let the (warranted) arnie worshipping begin

Might be but stop looking at some numbers.  ::)

(http://graysmatter.codivation.com/content/binary/dexter_jackson.jpg)