Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Bodybuilding Boards => Training Q&A => Topic started by: dyslexic on December 27, 2009, 09:36:41 PM

Title: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: dyslexic on December 27, 2009, 09:36:41 PM
It has been said that good bodybuilders often approach leg training thinking they can only be successful if they are crawling out of the gym after their squats are completed.

Quote: "Usually, this defeatist philosophy is a result of improper exercise form (e.g.,bending forward, lifting too much weight sloppily, and a lack of concentration on the quads)--(")

Personally, I feel you must train "heavy" (entirely subjective to the individual) and you must also learn to feel the quads working and burning. There are skinny twink types in every gym doing 1/8 reps with 5 plates on each side. They NEVER grow and their physiques never change. These guys also steal every 45 in the gym for the leg press and move the apparatus about 4-5 inches. They are tearing the fuk out of their knees and ligaments. I know (and you know) that they truly want to be big, but they aren't asking for your advice(s) as you cringe watching them and their headsets blare...

It is not necessary to start with the mindset that squats must be so exhausting that the cardiology team must be notified at the end of your sets. Think "quads" but don't make your focus entirely on exhaustion. (?)


Those of us "old school" bb's probably have not really bought into this theory. I personally have a hard time with it, but the references are pretty solid.



I have learned to look forward to leg day, but deep down inside there is that dread. If you have truly worked your quads, you might feel queasy the rest of the day. No cardio. Long nap.


Am I messed up? Thoughts anyone?
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: calfzilla on December 27, 2009, 10:40:34 PM
This morning I went to the gym and there was this real hot fit chick there doing legs.  Man just watching her made me feel like a total pussy, but gave me motivation to train legs harder.  I admit I don't care enough about legs as I do upperbody plus my legs are genetically ok, but still I do have a lot of room for improvement and I honestly am not putting everything into leg training. 
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: wes on December 28, 2009, 04:40:40 AM
I always get a lot of anxiety on leg day,but I love the challenge.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: tonymctones on December 28, 2009, 09:22:06 AM
I think im fairly gifted genetically leg wise as well at least compared to the rest of my body. I agree with trying to concentrate on your quads but in all honesty I feel squats more in my ass in general than quads. I always felt more quads from leg presses but I agree with a full range of motion.

I think the speed of the reps especially the negative part is really important as well you see alot of ppl on the leg press who basically drop the weight and then press instead of lowering it controlled.

as for the mentality I think that it can be counterproductive to be honest, that type of workout is extremely taxing not only physcially but mentally as well. Like you mentioned you get to the point where you dread leg days. I have a general idea of what im going to lift and how many reps Im going for before i hit the gym if I get that and have more in the tank I may do another set or a few more reps but I dont intentionally go to the gym with the idea of crawling out.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: nolotil on December 28, 2009, 09:34:07 AM
leg training is hard..but some people forget what the goal is..the goal should not be to make it maximally hard or painful ,..goal should be to grow by getting stronger in the basic exercises but you have to do the movements correctly. in many cases squatting with your ass out like a powerlifter wont grow your quads optimally..better to use abit less weight and do them in a more upright position with good control. also squats are NOT a must to grow your quads its a great exercise for many but not everyone specially if yuo have very long legs then leg press can be a better choice

alot of people they go too heavy in the squats,, yes you must get stronger but get stronger with correct technique,, very important. quads can grow with low and high reps If you use correct technique..i say mostly do 6-12 reps for quads..sometimes lower than that and sometimes higher than that.

i believe in full range of motion most of the time,, sometime there can be specific use for partial movement but only when yuo know the correct technique and been training for a while can partial movements be used. safest is to do close stance partial press in leg press but only as addition never as foundation.


i built very large quads and i onnly done squat, leg press and leg extension for quads so there is no magic exercises. leg curl+straight leg deadlift for hamstrings


6-9 sets quads 6-9 sets for hamstring. every 5th day is very good for growth. 2 times per week in specific situation for 4-6 weeks if you do maintaince training for resr of the body
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: dyslexic on December 28, 2009, 03:03:29 PM
I went to the gym today for the big leg workout. I always have my days routine penciled out in advance. It makes me work harder because I have to set the standard and then rise to the occasion. If I don't do this with legs, I find myself wimping out with the rep count.

I had it all set up with 1) leg extensions 2) squats 3) hacks 4) leg presses 5) leg curls 6) stiff legged deads.


I did everything but the squats. I opted to max the weight on the leg press for 10 reps. I also added 3 sets of high-rep/ low weight at the end.


My leg press set went like this: 4 plates x 25, 6 plates x 20, 8 plates x 15, 10 plates x 15, 12 plates x 15, 14 plates (with knee wraps) x 15, 16 plates x 10. My legs actually buckled today during one of the lighter sets.


It was not my intention to leave the squats out, but I could feel that today wouldn't be a great leg day. I always make sure I get a big breakfast too. I won't skip my leg workout, I just deviate from the routine once in awhile. I got a bit dizzy and ended up with a slight headache, so I really didn't feel bad about leaving out the squats. I don't give a shit how many plates I can do for full reps on the leg press (even if my legs give out) -- the leg press is never as much work as squats no matter how much weight I use.


I guess today will be an "instinctual" training day, and I guarantee I will be sore tomorrow. I would not have made it through my sets, reps and pre-chosen weights in the squats today. Well, not without stopping every other rep to gasp for air and stop my head from spinning.


Bottom line: I still crawled out to my car and felt just like I always do. I guess it's inevitable on leg day.


You know what else sucks? The gym was packed ( I suppose b/c of the holidays) and everyone was pumping up their upper bodies. NOBODY ( I mean nobody) else was working legs.

Bastards. 
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: Yev33 on December 29, 2009, 11:04:26 PM
As stupid as it sounds, the scene from pumping iron where Ed Corney and Arnold are squatting made me want to lift weights. When I was a kid I used to do tons of pushups, dips, and pull ups but didn't do anything for legs. When I saw that scene I knew that I wanted to squat, I could care less about the bench press and the curls. To this day, every single leg workout consists of either a back squat or a front squat for various rep ranges depending on the training phase. If Im feeling tired that day and have low energy, that will be the only thing I do that workout. There is no better feeling than setting a PR in a true full squat. I never have issues getting psyched up for squats, leg presses and hack squats I hate with a passion some days though and dread doing them.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: coltrane on December 30, 2009, 01:43:57 PM
The key to leg training is short intervals between sets.  Period.

Squats build big asses.

Heavy leg presses with short rest periods between sets are great.  Then higher rep lighter weight.


Short rest intervals.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: dyslexic on December 30, 2009, 02:30:57 PM
I've seen Charles Glass go off on the stance in a squat having everything to do with ass width (hips) or the quads. Many "gurus" say to keep the stance narrow, toes slightly inward and lower just below parallel for more quads, less ass.


Who knows? I can get wasted on leg presses and I feel that they are very productive. I also think that the squats will get you some decent quad size... not sure about the hip width theory.


Power lifters always take that wide stance... do they have big asses? I ain't gonna look.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: Meso_z on December 30, 2009, 03:58:10 PM
I also think smith squats are great for quads, did them today..
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: nolotil on December 30, 2009, 07:35:12 PM
The key to leg training is short intervals between sets.  Period.

Squats build big asses.

Heavy leg presses with short rest periods between sets are great.  Then higher rep lighter weight.


Short rest intervals.

not true..if you take too short rest you will have to use much lighter weight and heavy tension is what grows your muscle primarily. yes pump feels great with short rest but its desceptive feeling. as pump doesnt grow you.
 squat dont only build big ass they big big huge legs for alot people if they have structure for squats and correct bodybuilding squat technique and dont squat like powerlifters,,squats are not a must but for many people they are a great exercise.

if your smart you do first heavy exercise with adequate rest between set..maybe 3-5 min...then second exercise faster pace then you get best of both worlds,.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: dyslexic on December 30, 2009, 10:57:37 PM
I also think smith squats are great for quads, did them today..


I would opt for them more often if the Smith wasn't always being used at my gym. Someone is always doing incline presses on it... forever.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: Yev33 on December 30, 2009, 11:20:39 PM
Maybe it's just me, but I never liked smith squats. Tried the back squats and front squats at various times and it never feels right to me, it's like my body is being forced into a movement pattern that it wasn't designed for. Usually my back or my knees ache after doing them and that never happens with free squats. Plus im stronger on free squats so I figure whats the point.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: calfzilla on December 30, 2009, 11:47:00 PM
I skipped legs today and opted for a nap.  So tomorrow I will train with much intensity. 
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: YoungBlood on December 31, 2009, 10:01:25 AM


I've always been a squat kind of guy. Never really liked leg presses. I find them to not allow me ROM, if I do them where I feel comfortable with the ROM, my butt comes off the pad- and that's with the back pad all the way back.

I love squats. The feel of my legs pumping with blood, the weight on my back, the plates jangling and making that beautiful sound, the challenge of trying to increase weight and/or reps.

And I've said it before, and will continue to say it again....I do not care what the weight on the bar is. I'm after what the weight feels like. Like Robbie Robinson once was quoted as saying in a M&F book, "make the 225 feel like 405."

I've had workouts where I nearly passed out, doing supersets, trisets, giant sets...doing maximum lifts, or super slow lifts with an outrageous TUT count. It's all valid, it's how you piece it together and when, that counts.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: dyslexic on December 31, 2009, 11:47:36 AM

I've always been a squat kind of guy. Never really liked leg presses. I find them to not allow me ROM, if I do them where I feel comfortable with the ROM, my butt comes off the pad- and that's with the back pad all the way back.

I love squats. The feel of my legs pumping with blood, the weight on my back, the plates jangling and making that beautiful sound, the challenge of trying to increase weight and/or reps.

And I've said it before, and will continue to say it again....I do not care what the weight on the bar is. I'm after what the weight feels like. Like Robbie Robinson once was quoted as saying in a M&F book, "make the 225 feel like 405."

I've had workouts where I nearly passed out, doing supersets, trisets, giant sets...doing maximum lifts, or super slow lifts with an outrageous TUT count. It's all valid, it's how you piece it together and when, that counts.




Pics of legs to make sure your philosophy is working...  ;D
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: YoungBlood on December 31, 2009, 12:10:09 PM



Pics of legs to make sure your philosophy is working...  ;D

This is GetBig....nobody that talks a big game actually posts pics. You a newbie or something? ;D
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: Meso_z on December 31, 2009, 12:45:12 PM

I would opt for them more often if the Smith wasn't always being used at my gym. Someone is always doing incline presses on it... forever.

it felt great. no homo

it allows you to go down more "vertical" and use more quads..
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: chaos on December 31, 2009, 03:47:16 PM
I also think smith squats are great for quads, did them today..
The thing I found about smith squats was that I had a tendency to push back instead of up during heavier sets because of the fixed plane of motion.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: slaveboy1980 on December 31, 2009, 04:57:52 PM
And I've said it before, and will continue to say it again....I do not care what the weight on the bar is. I'm after what the weight feels like. Like Robbie Robinson once was quoted as saying in a M&F book, "make the 225 feel like 405."

I've had workouts where I nearly passed out, doing supersets, trisets, giant sets...doing maximum lifts, or super slow lifts with an outrageous TUT count. It's all valid, it's how you piece it together and when, that counts.

bullshit. that kind of nonsense will backfire for people who aint on drugs.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: chaos on December 31, 2009, 05:42:09 PM
bullshit. that kind of nonsense will backfire for people who aint on drugs.
Why ???
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: wild willie on December 31, 2009, 07:12:47 PM

I've always been a squat kind of guy. Never really liked leg presses. I find them to not allow me ROM, if I do them where I feel comfortable with the ROM, my butt comes off the pad- and that's with the back pad all the way back.

I love squats. The feel of my legs pumping with blood, the weight on my back, the plates jangling and making that beautiful sound, the challenge of trying to increase weight and/or reps.

And I've said it before, and will continue to say it again....I do not care what the weight on the bar is. I'm after what the weight feels like. Like Robbie Robinson once was quoted as saying in a M&F book, "make the 225 feel like 405."

I've had workouts where I nearly passed out, doing supersets, trisets, giant sets...doing maximum lifts, or super slow lifts with an outrageous TUT count. It's all valid, it's how you piece it together and when, that counts.
EXCELLENT STATEMENT HERE........IT IS KEY TO FEEL THE MOVEMENT AND TO CONTROL THE WEIGHT........FURTHERMOR E.....I HAVE SEEN COUNTLESS PEOPLE LIFT HEAVY IRON AND THEY NEVER GROW......BECAUSE THEY NEVER LEARN TO CONNECT THEIR MIND WITH THE EXERCISE THEY ARE PERFORMING. IMHO
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: dyslexic on December 31, 2009, 07:42:03 PM
Is LEE PRIEST here...???? ;D
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: YoungBlood on January 01, 2010, 10:14:42 AM
bullshit. that kind of nonsense will backfire for people who aint on drugs.

Like Chaos also said...."Why?"

Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: slaveboy1980 on January 01, 2010, 02:05:07 PM
Like Chaos also said...."Why?"



because that line of reasoning often leads to  chasing the pump or just 'feeling the muscle' and focusing on all kinds of crap that isnt imporant, but not on the most important thing (specially for naturals): increasing the weight of the bar.

certainly you should focus on correct technique and im not saying you should squat like a powerlifter with ass out and basically do goodmorning but fuck all that pump chasing training and making a 10lbs feeling like 25lbs bullshit. only works for drug users (hi milos), and even for drug users its a shitty approach.

keep a logbook and try to get stronger. forget all the vodoo bullshit about giant sets, super slow etc..    
sure drop sets ,supersets (alternating a quad exercise and a hamstrings exercise...but with rest between so you dont sacrifice poundages) can be useful sometimes but in general focus on straight sets and increasing the poundages you use.

and yeah as was mentioned above: dont rush between your heavy sets. do your heavy work and then if you want to you can do your second exercise with slightly lighter weights and less rest between the sets. heavy tension+ metabolic fatigue.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: YoungBlood on January 01, 2010, 02:14:24 PM
because that line of reasoning often leads to  chasing the pump or just 'feeling the muscle' and focusing on all kinds of crap that isnt imporant, but not on the most important thing (specially for naturals): increasing the weight of the bar.

certainly you should focus on correct technique and im not saying you should squat like a powerlifter with ass out and basically do goodmorning but fuck all that pump chasing training and making a 10lbs feeling like 25lbs bullshit. only works for drug users (hi milos), and even for drug users its a shitty approach.

keep a logbook and try to get stronger. forget all the vodoo bullshit about giant sets, super slow etc..    
sure drop sets ,supersets (alternating a quad exercise and a hamstrings exercise...but with rest between so you dont sacrifice poundages) can be useful sometimes but in general focus on straight sets and increasing the poundages you use.

and yeah as was mentioned above: dont rush between your heavy sets. do your heavy work and then if you want to you can do your second exercise with slightly lighter weights and less rest between the sets. heavy tension+ metabolic fatigue.

So then what would happen, in your opinion, if someone was gunning for 10 reps with 225 making it feel as heavy as possible and once you hit 10 reps you raise the weight to 245 and repeat the cycle? 

I think you're not seeing the forest for the trees here. :) I mentioned just one factor/aspect, and you make it seem like nobody should do that because they'll lose focus on other things...in other words I think you generalized what I said. Or maybe I did that with your statement. Either way, I'll just agree to disagree.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: tbombz on January 01, 2010, 02:16:55 PM
because that line of reasoning often leads to  chasing the pump or just 'feeling the muscle' and focusing on all kinds of crap that isnt imporant, but not on the most important thing (specially for naturals): increasing the weight of the bar.

certainly you should focus on correct technique and im not saying you should squat like a powerlifter with ass out and basically do goodmorning but fuck all that pump chasing training and making a 10lbs feeling like 25lbs bullshit. only works for drug users (hi milos), and even for drug users its a shitty approach.

keep a logbook and try to get stronger. forget all the vodoo bullshit about giant sets, super slow etc..    
sure drop sets ,supersets (alternating a quad exercise and a hamstrings exercise...but with rest between so you dont sacrifice poundages) can be useful sometimes but in general focus on straight sets and increasing the poundages you use.

and yeah as was mentioned above: dont rush between your heavy sets. do your heavy work and then if you want to you can do your second exercise with slightly lighter weights and less rest between the sets. heavy tension+ metabolic fatigue.


right on the money. the weight always has to be increasing. although i would point out that we are talking about getting a certain weight for a certain amount of reps, and increasing the weight used within a certain rep range. most of the time we are talking about working out with 3-5 exercises and 3-5 sets per exercise. maybe one warm up in the first one or two exercises. and workign out with poundages that make you come close to, if not to failure at about 6-10 reps.  week by week you slowly get stronger and increase the amount of weight your wroking with. when one weight gets light enough for you to get 11 reps, then you increase the weight to one where you can get 5-6 reps. then slowly get up to where you can do that weight for 11 reps, then repeat that process over and over again. sticking to basic compound exercises. this is a completely fol proof way to ensure optimal growth.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: nolotil on January 01, 2010, 02:18:29 PM
good stuff slaveboy1980 i agree with you totally., many people make it more complicated than it need to be, and focus on wrong parameters.  :)
i see it happening all the time people go to the gym without defined goal which will hold them back. tip top post!
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: tbombz on January 01, 2010, 02:25:15 PM
So then what would happen, in your opinion, if someone was gunning for 10 reps with 225 making it feel as heavy as possible and once you hit 10 reps you raise the weight to 245 and repeat the cycle?  

I think you're not seeing the forest for the trees here. :) I mentioned just one factor/aspect, and you make it seem like nobody should do that because they'll lose focus on other things...in other words I think you generalized what I said. Or maybe I did that with your statement. Either way, I'll just agree to disagree.
i cant speak for slaveboy but i know thta i dont personally see why what your saying cant apply to what slaveboy was saying. most of the time people associate "pump" "feel" "squeeze" "stretch" "isolate"...with "train like a pussy and never increase weight"...     so of course someone will experience shitty results if they are trainign that way....  but when you train hard and increase weight AND focus, feel, squeeze, isolate...thats just covering all your bases.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: YoungBlood on January 01, 2010, 02:40:20 PM

The weight isn't the only thing that matters. I don't think either of you are saying that, really I hope that's not the case. But there's a happy medium between the fucktards that lift 405 for squats of a brutal 1/4" of depth, and have toothpick-like development, versus guys that squat half as much and have better results.
Most people are on either end of the two extremes. Not too many that you find in the middle. But the guy you find in the middle, is the guy that is making progress.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: tbombz on January 01, 2010, 02:43:46 PM
The weight isn't the only thing that matters. I don't think either of you are saying that, really I hope that's not the case. But there's a happy medium between the fucktards that lift 405 for squats of a brutal 1/4" of depth, and have toothpick-like development, versus guys that squat half as much and have better results.
Most people are on either end of the two extremes. Not too many that you find in the middle. But the guy you find in the middle, is the guy that is making progress.
well weight is not the only thing that matters. of course proper execution of the exercise is critical as well.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: dyslexic on January 01, 2010, 09:40:13 PM
More strength is logically supposed to equate to more muscle.


On the other hand, you will see powerlifters get stronger over time and maintain the same weight class.


Me? I like getting stronger, but truth be told-- I much prefer getting BIGGER!  ;D  Isn't this why a bodybuilding competition couldn't possibly be a strongman event?


I have always kept a training log. I am fairly meticulous with it. There are times when more strength resulted in more size, but not always.


Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: wes on January 02, 2010, 06:23:39 AM
Gotta` agree with my man Youngblood on this one.


Most people are gonna` plateau strengthwise once a certain poundage is reached.....sometimes for quite a while, thus making a poundage increase impossible as well as even adding one more rep to a set.

Lots of ways to increase intensity,some of which Youngblood already mentioned.

Build the muscle=the key thing to remember in bodybuilding............ ...... and increasing weight is not the only way to do that.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: chaos on January 02, 2010, 05:15:01 PM
Gotta` agree with my man Youngblood on this one.

Build the muscle=the key thing to remember in bodybuilding............ ...... and increasing weight is not the only way to do that.
This.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: IrishMuscle84 on January 02, 2010, 09:07:13 PM
I love training legs :o......yes, i just said i love training legs. 8)
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: Yev33 on January 03, 2010, 01:08:22 AM
you gotta love leg day, if you have  a busy and hectic week and you could only make it to the gym once that week but you did some heavy ass deads or squats till you saw stars in your eyes all your training sins have been forgiven!
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: slaveboy1980 on January 03, 2010, 03:22:45 PM
So then what would happen, in your opinion, if someone was gunning for 10 reps with 225 making it feel as heavy as possible and once you hit 10 reps you raise the weight to 245 and repeat the cycle? 

I think you're not seeing the forest for the trees here. :) I mentioned just one factor/aspect, and you make it seem like nobody should do that because they'll lose focus on other things...in other words I think you generalized what I said. Or maybe I did that with your statement. Either way, I'll just agree to disagree.

im not missing anything, just saying if your not getting stronger over a period of time you wont grow. you can superset and dropset all day but without adding weight to the bar sometime you aint growing. and of course im talking about using good technique (although i do believe in cheating in certain situations).

in the short term, yes you can grow for a limited time by using the same weight, and also by manipulating other variables than weight on the bar, but its not a longterm strategy for growth.

as for getting past plateus: the best way to do that is to plan your training (and progress)...periodize your training.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: wes on January 04, 2010, 03:27:00 AM
To build muscle,you must first break down tissue,then ea,sleep/rest to rebuild.

You gotta` train your ass off, but adding weight to the bar is just one of many ways to tear down tissue so that it can be rebuilt later.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: slaveboy1980 on January 04, 2010, 04:50:43 AM
To build muscle,you must first break down tissue,then ea,sleep/rest to rebuild.

You gotta` train your ass off, but adding weight to the bar is just one of many ways to tear down tissue so that it can be rebuilt later.

1. adding weight to the bar is the MAIN growth pathway in the long term. (or actually more and more tension on the muscle)
2. if you read my reply i stated yes there are other things you can do in the short term to squeeze out growth BUT IF YOUR NOT GETTING STRONGER IN THE LONG RUN YOU AINT FUCKING GROWING NO MATTER WHAT YOUR 80s FLEX MAGAZINES SAY. end of story (atleast for naturals  :D).
3. drugs change alot of things but even as a drug user you should focus on adding weight to the bar.
4. adding weight to the bar and focusing on getting stronger doesnt mean you necessarily have to lift exactly like a powerlifter, nor does it mean im advocating poor technique.
5. i cant believe how poor knowledge base alot of so called bodybuilders have. stop using flex magazine as your only source of information about training and nutrition.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: slaveboy1980 on January 04, 2010, 05:02:25 AM
to build muscle synthesis has be larger than muscle breakdown. the body is always both breaking down and synthesizing muscle tissue. usually there is a balance between synthesis and breakdown. training increases protein synthesis  AND breakdown...,but together with protein (amino acids)+carbs, training (hopefully)increases protein synthesis more than breakdown > net effect is growth.
as the years* go by the protein syntesis increase from training+protein and carbs grows less which explains why it becomes harder and harder to grow.

*training years +natural ageing process
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: dyslexic on January 04, 2010, 08:09:53 AM
I'm wondering how many of you read this thread? It really veered off track as far as "The Gym" itself was concerned, but it also became interesting at times. There are a few points discussed there that I was trying to discuss here.


http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=312567.0

Seems we are all wrong (and have been) for quite some time... regardless of our knowledge and progress.  ::)


Sorry, no cliffs. It was this statement that got me going:

"Not really. Anyone who has been around the Irongame for a long time realizes that a lot of beliefs are held like people hold religious convictions. Opinions and attitudes spread in various ways and they guide behaviour, beliefs, theories and so on. We believe lots of things we don't comprehend. Eg., a muscle needs to recover to grow. That, in my opinion, is false, but most gym goers believe it. The actual physical processes that occur in muscles are very complicated. The discipline of exercise science is exceedingly difficult, and most here, including myself, don't have the vocabulary to comprehend it. That doesn't stop us from formulating theories based on our experience. However, that usually isn't very solid for evidence that the theories work and are true.

If what I am saying is true is it any wonder that there is so much disagreement in bodybuilding? Go to any muscle forum and there are still debates about training." 
 
 
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: greg2112 on January 04, 2010, 01:41:59 PM
good advice!!  I am natural and I got stuck in a major rut in terms of lifting..Disovered the DC principles a yr ago and have never looked back in terms of volume/pump lifting..Eating healthy and beating the log book weekly has helped overcome a major rut

1. adding weight to the bar is the MAIN growth pathway in the long term. (or actually more and more tension on the muscle)
2. if you read my reply i stated yes there are other things you can do in the short term to squeeze out growth BUT IF YOUR NOT GETTING STRONGER IN THE LONG RUN YOU AINT FUCKING GROWING NO MATTER WHAT YOUR 80s FLEX MAGAZINES SAY. end of story (atleast for naturals  :D).
3. drugs change alot of things but even as a drug user you should focus on adding weight to the bar.
4. adding weight to the bar and focusing on getting stronger doesnt mean you necessarily have to lift exactly like a powerlifter, nor does it mean im advocating poor technique.
5. i cant believe how poor knowledge base alot of so called bodybuilders have. stop using flex magazine as your only source of information about training and nutrition.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: tbombz on January 04, 2010, 02:09:22 PM
slaveboy is right. if you are growing, you are getting stronger, if only just a little bit. if the muscle grew, it also got a stronger.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: slaveboy1980 on January 04, 2010, 02:45:10 PM
let me also add that you dont (and can't after you been training a while) have to add weight or reps EVERY workout (as some HIT maniacs claim). im not saying that at all..and you can actually stimulate growth with same weight for a certain amount of time and by manipulating variables such as training volume (generally not a route id recommend for naturals..but this is not the place to go into details about that), workout density (including rest periods between sets)..but we are talking about a very limited time. so what people should be doing is having a SYSTEM FOR PROGRESSION (which should be included in a periodized set up) and not rely on haphazard supersetting or dropsetting to bust through plateus.

Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: tbombz on January 04, 2010, 02:57:54 PM
let me also add that you dont (and can't after you been training a while) have to add weight or reps EVERY workout (as some HIT maniacs claim). im not saying that at all..and you can actually stimulate growth with same weight for a certain amount of time and by manipulating variables such as training volume (generally not a route id recommend for naturals..but this is not the place to go into details about that), workout density (including rest periods between sets)..but we are talking about a very limited time. so what people should be doing is having a SYSTEM FOR PROGRESSION (which should be included in a periodized set up) and not rely on haphazard supersetting or dropsetting to bust through plateus.



thats true but it is possible to always increase weight. you can buy little magnetic plates that come in very light amounts. keeping a log book and every week going up in small increments. im talking one or maybe two or three pounds a week. some weeks maybe you get a half pound.  but always a bit more.

i believe its called "the kaisen method"
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: slaveboy1980 on January 04, 2010, 03:13:46 PM
thats true but it is possible to always increase weight. you can buy little magnetic plates that come in very light amounts. keeping a log book and every week going up in small increments. im talking one or maybe two or three pounds a week. some weeks maybe you get a half pound.  but always a bit more.

i believe its called "the kaisen method"

yes kaisen is a japanese word for small improvements if i remember correctly (and the concept has been applied in many fields). what you say is partly true..but even with very small plates not everyone will be able to get stronger from workout to workout. for example at advanced levels rate of adaption will be so slow so not even microplates will always been enough or the smart way to go (for various reasons..one being: manipulating reps may be more effective)
also there is another factor that using microplates you often have to increase the length (stretch out) of a training cycle which necessarily doesnt have to be a good thing. there is much to write about this subject but i dont wanna get too much into advanced training programming in this thread.

dont get me wrong microplates can be a good idea but is not always the way to go.

let me also add that i certainly believe in using small plates such as 0.5kg-1kg..and i do so myself but  you wont always be able to addt even that from workout to workout. nor is it necessary to add weight EVERY SEssion as some HIT fanatics claim.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: dyslexic on January 04, 2010, 04:34:30 PM
... there is much to write about this subject but i dont wanna get too much into advanced training programming in this thread.





Why not? We got all the time and ears in the world. If you can't get into it here, where can you? Start a new thread if you want... I'm all ears.


I'm here to gain knowledge. Don't hold back on me now!
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: Yev33 on January 04, 2010, 09:50:47 PM


Why not? We got all the time and ears in the world. If you can't get into it here, where can you? Start a new thread if you want... I'm all ears.


I'm here to gain knowledge. Don't hold back on me now!


We are all here to gain knowledge, anyone that has been lifting for over 5 years has run into plateaus and had to do something to get past them. Im always interested in what others have to say on the topic of progression. We might not be 100% right in our theories, but if they have worked even for a little bit in either adding strength or mass ( or both ) we can't be 100% wrong. So I say if you have information or opinions on the subject you should definetly post them.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: jpm101 on January 05, 2010, 09:29:13 AM
May be rare but I notice that some BB'ers just do not like having a heavy bar placed on their shoulders. Let alone walking backwards with it (even in a cage, that fear is still present). Somewhat of a phobia that the weight (any weight ..really) will trap them under it or crush and/or wreak their backs somehow. Balance can also be an issue to throw into the mix(put heels on a 2X4 or BB plates for better balance and quad influence). So with them the defeatist attitude is pre established. This phobia can also transfer over to DL's. To the extreme, even having a weight over you (BB bench press) or above you (BB overhead pressing). All this unfounded fear can be overcome with a little patience, usually. Sure this has never happen to any of the macho studs on GB(?).

These types are better off with leg and other machines. Thought when doing BB hacks for the legs (great quad mass builder) it seems less a worry for them. This might suggest that the distance or height of the bar from the ground may have an effect on their fears. All a confidence factor really. Good Luck.

Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: IronIsLife on February 01, 2010, 09:49:11 PM
I love training legs but I have to agree with the OP that the sense of "dread" is definitely there pre-workout.

I think that's actually a good sign because it means that you have a standard to which you feel you must adhere.

I know that even though I often want to quit early, the feeling I have if I do is so much worse that I never stop until I've completed what I set out to before I stepped foot in the gym.

Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: YoungBlood on February 02, 2010, 08:37:13 AM


I definitely have a better workout, especially on legs, if I push myself. I'll dread walking in the gym and knocking out what I have planned out, but if the weight is too heavy or I can't get the reps I wanted, maybe even if I do get the reps I'll decide in that set I want two more....if I push myself, I and succeed I think it's a "success breeds success" kind of thing. And that helps me have a much better workout, physically and mentally.
Title: Re: Leg training and the "defeatist" philosophy
Post by: dyslexic on February 02, 2010, 05:57:55 PM
Here lately I just go directly to the squat rack to get it over with. I will warmup with the bar and then just start rockin out with my co..

wait.


What I meant is, I go for the hardest part of the leg workout instantly. I try to find enjoyment in it, but I'm huffing and puffing, guzzling water and feeling light-headed. I am too distracted to enjoy it.


I continue to wobble out of the gym. My legs just kind of "give out" when I am trying to walk normally. I feel like I have accomplished something important... besides the fact that everyone else in my gym is curling and pressing..


If it werent for me, my gym wouldnt have a squat rack.