Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Soul Crusher on July 04, 2010, 05:32:03 PM

Title: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 04, 2010, 05:32:03 PM
How is this for transparency?  ::)  ::) 

No, lets discuss the major importance of Palin & Steele! 

Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: pro nitrousADRL on July 04, 2010, 08:53:14 PM
HOPE AND CHANGE MOTHER FUCKERS :D   :D   :D   :D   :D   :D  :D   :D   :D   :D   :D   :D   :D   :D   :D   :D   :D   :D   :D
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Skip8282 on July 05, 2010, 06:32:47 AM
Unreal.  Of course their going to hide behind the "safety" bullshit.  Libs hate the 1st amendment, unless they want to use it themselves.
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: James on July 05, 2010, 07:50:03 AM
How is this for transparency?  ::)  ::) 

No, lets discuss the major importance of Palin & Steele! 



transparency  ::) 

Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Straw Man on July 05, 2010, 08:53:10 AM
How is this for transparency?  ::)  ::) 

No, lets discuss the major importance of Palin & Steele! 



and yet somehow you are also against giving subpoena power to the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling

how does that work?

maybe you're really a double agent for Obama's commie agenda and all your inane ranting about Obama intentionally collapsing the system is just a ruse to make the whole idea look utterly ridiculous so no one will take it seriously

so far your plan is working perfectly

kudos to you comrade



Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: kcballer on July 05, 2010, 08:55:17 AM
My guess would be, BP's agreement to give up billions to the government fund was done with the acceptance that no more press be allowed to film the area.  It's damage control by BP and i'm sure other oil companies, they don't want anymore images sullying their name or the name of big oil so they've tightened the screws on the white house.  This is the democracy we live in and have lived in for decades.
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Straw Man on July 05, 2010, 09:02:40 AM
well our Supreme Court has said the corporations are people and I guess foreign corporations are people too.

So, foreign corporate "persons" seem to have more power that the actual human citizens of the country

seems like corporate persons (even foreigners and by definition - non-citizens)actually get more rights than actual human persons and somehow are immune from our investigation by our press as well

I wonder why that is?
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 05, 2010, 09:04:09 AM

maybe you're really a double agent for Obama's commie agenda and all your inane ranting about Obama intentionally collapsing the system is just a ruse to make the whole idea look utterly ridiculous so no one will take it seriously

so far your plan is working perfectly


No one takes him serious anyway.  Poor chap.  All the ranting and raving he does and people simply dismiss it as they would do an elderly aunt with Alzhiemers disease talking about her imaginary children.

Give him a smile.  A little "tee-hee" and just wait for his next little bullshit out burst.
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Fury on July 05, 2010, 09:08:45 AM
Unreal.  Of course their going to hide behind the "safety" bullshit.  Libs hate the 1st amendment, unless they want to use it themselves.

Exactly.
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Straw Man on July 05, 2010, 09:21:32 AM
Exactly.

if thats true the Republicans must hate it even more

more likely blanket statements like that are just complete bullshit
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Straw Man on July 05, 2010, 09:31:27 AM
No one takes him serious anyway.  Poor chap.  All the ranting and raving he does and people simply dismiss it as they would do an elderly aunt with Alzhiemers disease talking about her imaginary children.

Give him a smile.  A little "tee-hee" and just wait for his next little bullshit out burst.

I'm pretty sure 333 has some actual emotional or mental problems
there are plenty of borderline people walking around who haven't committed any crimes or anything and can sort of function in the world but when you talk with them you quickly realize they are as crazy as a shithouse rat.
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: SAMSON123 on July 05, 2010, 11:24:40 AM
How is this for transparency?  ::)  ::) 

No, lets discuss the major importance of Palin & Steele! 



Amazing to get this overly long winded rant from Anderson cooper... If only he spent as much time covering REAL NEWS as opposed to the ambulance chasing he normally does he would seem more credible. The theatrics both he and CNN deliver is more poor entertainment than anything else.
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Skip8282 on July 05, 2010, 03:46:47 PM
Amazing to get this overly long winded rant from Anderson cooper... If only he spent as much time covering REAL NEWS as opposed to the ambulance chasing he normally does he would seem more credible. The theatrics both he and CNN deliver is more poor entertainment than anything else.


Real news such as...?
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 05, 2010, 06:29:18 PM
and yet somehow you are also against giving subpoena power to the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling

how does that work?

maybe you're really a double agent for Obama's commie agenda and all your inane ranting about Obama intentionally collapsing the system is just a ruse to make the whole idea look utterly ridiculous so no one will take it seriously

so far your plan is working perfectly

kudos to you comrade





No, I said we should investigate both BP and your hero obama for their negligence after the oil is cleaned up and the mess taken care of.  the freaking well is not even capped yet. 

So good diversion asswipe.  Now you can see that Obama is as bad as Bush, if not worse.  Must be hard to stomach no? 
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 05, 2010, 06:31:36 PM
No one takes him serious anyway.  Poor chap.  All the ranting and raving he does and people simply dismiss it as they would do an elderly aunt with Alzhiemers disease talking about her imaginary children.

Give him a smile.  A little "tee-hee" and just wait for his next little bullshit out burst.

Lurker - you are not exactly a beacon or oracle of intelligence, and that's being nice. 

As for this clip, it speaks for itself.  Obama = Bush, but worse.   
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 05, 2010, 06:33:16 PM
Amazing to get this overly long winded rant from Anderson cooper... If only he spent as much time covering REAL NEWS as opposed to the ambulance chasing he normally does he would seem more credible. The theatrics both he and CNN deliver is more poor entertainment than anything else.

Bro - with all due respect - you are a complete moron if you think AC's reporting on the cover up and govt regs now banning reporters from covering the spill and doing everything to hamper their efforts is not real news. 

Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Straw Man on July 05, 2010, 06:54:35 PM
No, I said we should investigate both BP and your hero obama for their negligence after the oil is cleaned up and the mess taken care of.  the freaking well is not even capped yet. 

So good diversion asswipe.  Now you can see that Obama is as bad as Bush, if not worse.  Must be hard to stomach no? 

maybe you supported an investigation on another thread but on this thread linked below you seem to be against it:
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=341780.0
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 05, 2010, 07:13:16 PM
maybe you supported an investigation on another thread but on this thread linked below you seem to be against it:
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=341780.0


right now, yes, since all efforts from all congresspeople, agencies, etc should be on stopping the spill, and getting the mess cleaned up. 

After we get the well capped and the spill cleaned up, investigate everyone, including BP and Obama. 
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Straw Man on July 05, 2010, 08:02:27 PM
right now, yes, since all efforts from all congresspeople, agencies, etc should be on stopping the spill, and getting the mess cleaned up. 

After we get the well capped and the spill cleaned up, investigate everyone, including BP and Obama. 

you know we can do more than one thing at a time

the people on the commission (whoever they are) aren't going to be the ones to solve the problem of the spill

better to investigate ASAP rather than letting memories fade, evidence destroyed and political will compromised (the Repubs are already busy apologizing to BP and blocking subpoenas)
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 05, 2010, 08:07:27 PM
Fine, have a commission, although obama campaigned against them. 

Most of these things never accomplish a damn thing and far more will be discovered in litigation proceedings in trial court than this nonsense. 
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Fury on July 05, 2010, 08:30:53 PM
Fine, have a commission, although obama campaigned against them. 

Most of these things never accomplish a damn thing and far more will be discovered in litigation proceedings in trial court than this nonsense. 

All it will do is waste millions of dollars to draw some vague and obscure conclusion that neither proves nor accomplishes anything .
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 06, 2010, 05:44:45 AM
Lurker - you are not exactly a beacon or oracle of intelligence, and that's being nice. 

As for this clip, it speaks for itself.  Obama = Bush, but worse.   

Coming from someone as delusional and stupid as yourself, that statement means nothing.  Just like the rest of your posts.

Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 06, 2010, 06:04:08 AM
Coming from someone as delusional and stupid as yourself, that statement means nothing.  Just like the rest of your posts.



You calling anyone else delusional and stupid has to be the funniest post of the year. 
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 06, 2010, 06:24:12 AM
Unreal.  Of course their going to hide behind the "safety" bullshit.  Libs hate the 1st amendment, unless they want to use it themselves.

Skip - check this out.  DHS is already starting it up. 

________________________ ________________________ ____________________

TSA to Block "Controversial Opinion" on the Web
Posted by Pia Malbran 69 comments .
Share993 20diggsdiggShareE-mailPrintFont .


 (Credit: CBS News) The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is blocking certain websites from the federal agency's computers, including halting access by staffers to any Internet pages that contain a "controversial opinion," according to an internal email obtained by CBS News.

The email was sent to all TSA employees from the Office of Information Technology on Friday afternoon.

It states that as of July 1, TSA employees will no longer be allowed to access five categories of websites that have been deemed "inappropriate for government access."

The categories include:

• Chat/Messaging

• Controversial opinion

• Criminal activity

• Extreme violence (including cartoon violence) and gruesome content

• Gaming

The email does not specify how the TSA will determine if a website expresses a "controversial opinion."

There is also no explanation as to why controversial opinions are being blocked, although the email stated that some of the restricted websites violate the Employee Responsibilities and Conduct policy.

The TSA did not return calls seeking comment by publication time.
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Straw Man on July 06, 2010, 09:57:12 AM
Skip - check this out.  DHS is already starting it up. 

________________________ ________________________ ____________________

TSA to Block "Controversial Opinion" on the Web
Posted by Pia Malbran 69 comments .
Share993 20diggsdiggShareE-mailPrintFont .


 (Credit: CBS News) The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is blocking certain websites from the federal agency's computers, including halting access by staffers to any Internet pages that contain a "controversial opinion," according to an internal email obtained by CBS News.

The email was sent to all TSA employees from the Office of Information Technology on Friday afternoon.

It states that as of July 1, TSA employees will no longer be allowed to access five categories of websites that have been deemed "inappropriate for government access."

The categories include:

• Chat/Messaging

• Controversial opinion

• Criminal activity

• Extreme violence (including cartoon violence) and gruesome content

• Gaming

The email does not specify how the TSA will determine if a website expresses a "controversial opinion."

There is also no explanation as to why controversial opinions are being blocked, although the email stated that some of the restricted websites violate the Employee Responsibilities and Conduct policy.

The TSA did not return calls seeking comment by publication time.


take off your tin foil hat 333

many large companies (and small ones too) block internet access and various other progrems such as IM .  I have many friends who work at banks (for example) where they block things as benign as access to hotmail
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 06, 2010, 09:58:32 AM
What qualifies as a "controversial opinion"? 
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Straw Man on July 06, 2010, 10:03:14 AM
What qualifies as a "controversial opinion"? 

who cares?

Any business or organization can block access to the internet if they want to

happens every day in businesses and organizations all over the country

if people want to surf the web or play games, etc... they can do it on their own time
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 06, 2010, 10:06:41 AM
who cares?

Any business or organization can block access to the internet if they want to

happens every day in businesses and organizations all over the country

if people want to surf the web or play games, etc... they can do it on their own time

I agree 100% straw, but this seems to be extremely subjective based on the view of the "powers that be". 

I am a free speech fanatic and would never want any speech banned whatsoever. 

and why are they banning websites re: "crime"? 

Wouldnt the TSA maybe want their employees investigating ways criminals get stuff on board the planes etc? 
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: 240 is Back on July 06, 2010, 10:07:59 AM
Skip - check this out.  DHS is already starting it up.  

TSA to Block "Controversial Opinion" on the Web
Posted by Pia Malbran 69 comments .
Share993 20diggsdiggShareE-mailPrintFont .


 (Credit: CBS News) The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is blocking certain websites from the federal agency's computers, including halting access by staffers to any Internet pages that contain a "controversial opinion," according to an internal email obtained by CBS News.

The email was sent to all TSA employees from the Office of Information Technology on Friday afternoon.

It states that as of July 1, TSA employees will no longer be allowed to access five categories of websites that have been deemed "inappropriate for government access."

The categories include:

• Chat/Messaging

• Controversial opinion

• Criminal activity

• Extreme violence (including cartoon violence) and gruesome content

• Gaming

The email does not specify how the TSA will determine if a website expresses a "controversial opinion."

There is also no explanation as to why controversial opinions are being blocked, although the email stated that some of the restricted websites violate the Employee Responsibilities and Conduct policy.

The TSA did not return calls seeking comment by publication time.



Just to be clear...

We're now pissed off that GOVT EMPLOYEES being paid OUR TAXPAYER DOLLARS aren't allowed to chat, surf porn, read violent comics, play online video games, or engage in any criminal acts online, while at work?

You're somehow pissed about this?   Holy fvck, they shouldn't be allowed to play on google or ebay either.  THEYRE AT WORK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Straw Man on July 06, 2010, 10:08:58 AM
I agree 100% straw, but this seems to be extremely subjective based on the view of the "powers that be". 

I am a free speech fanatic and would never want any speech banned whatsoever. 

and why are they banning websites re: "crime"? 

Wouldnt the TSA maybe want their employees investigating ways criminals get stuff on board the planes etc? 

I just texted a friend who works for the biggest bank in the country and GetBig.com is blocked on his computer.

I'm sure any TSA employee who needs access to certain parts of the internet to do his job will have that access.  

You're bitching about something that's completely common and happens everyday all over the country
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 06, 2010, 10:13:43 AM
It should be consistent.  If the Drudge Report is blocked, so should HP, DU , ETC.

BTW - I did not see porn on that list.   ;D  ;D 
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: 240 is Back on July 06, 2010, 10:30:26 AM
It should be consistent.  If the Drudge Report is blocked, so should HP, DU , ETC.

BTW - I did not see porn on that list.   ;D  ;D 

if I ran a company with lots of employees, they could visit the corporate website, and any sites immediately related to their jobs.   If they had time to kill, they can visit our online trainnig manual and get better at their jobs.

We're mad the govt is stopping waste here... unreal.
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Straw Man on July 06, 2010, 10:31:03 AM
It should be consistent.  If the Drudge Report is blocked, so should HP, DU , ETC.

BTW - I did not see porn on that list.   ;D  ;D 

yeah and if GetBig is blocked then MD and the like should all be blocked too

 ::)
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 06, 2010, 10:33:13 AM
yeah and if GetBig is blocked then MD and the like should all be blocked too

 ::)

Hey they got paraplegics and cripples to fondle, why should they be concerned about Drudge, HP, FR or DU?   
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 06, 2010, 12:36:21 PM
You calling anyone else delusional and stupid has to be the funniest post of the year. 

Since it was directed at you, that would make it the most truthful post of the year.

Cry and whine much?
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 06, 2010, 12:37:52 PM
Since it was directed at you, that would make it the most truthful post of the year.

Cry and whine much?

Not really, just that I get a huge laugh at your daily display of stupidity and smallness. 

TROLL!   
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 06, 2010, 12:38:30 PM


You're bitching about something that's completely common and happens everyday all over the country

We're mad the govt is stopping waste here... unreal.

Welcome to 333 La-La-Land. 
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 06, 2010, 12:39:30 PM
Not really, just that I get a huge laugh at your daily display of stupidity and smallness. 

TROLL!   


Oh look!  More crying.

Has the sky fallen yet?  Or is that happening tomorrow?
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 06, 2010, 12:41:15 PM

Oh look!  More crying.

Has the sky fallen yet?  Or is that happening tomorrow?

Ask the tens of millions of of work with no hope whatsoever due to your heros' policies. 
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 06, 2010, 12:44:11 PM
Sorry!  Can't get out to take a poll for you.  Streets are clogged with black duffel bag carrying unemployed docs who are chanting "Palin 2012!  Cause we quit too!"
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 06, 2010, 12:49:17 PM
Sorry!  Can't get out to take a poll for you.  Streets are clogged with black duffel bag carrying unemployed docs who are chanting "Palin 2012!  Cause we quit too!"

Ha ha asswipe. 

Leading economists are talking about a coming depression, the business roundtable is in revolt, UE is at 16.6% according to the U6 and being massaged to protect Dear Leader, Gulf Oil spill is a mess, Obama begging Gen. Betrayus to save his communist ass from defeat, et al.

You want more examples of failure of your Boy Wonder messiah or do you simply want to hurl nonsensical insults at me to deflect from the failure you support?     
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 06, 2010, 12:53:46 PM
Are leading economists talking about docs walking off their jobs?  About the nation having to go the DMV for health care?  About the End of Days scenario with the jobless swarming the streets and chaos erupting by the minute?  Are they talking about that?  Or is it just you?

Let me know when THEY are discussing it.  Then I might lend some credibility to it.  But when it is YOU discussing it, there is no credibility to be had.

I hardly view the board Crytalian possessing anything other than bullshit, hyperbole, and whining as worth listening to.

Carry on with the crying though.
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 06, 2010, 12:55:28 PM
Are leading economists talking about docs walking off their jobs?  About the nation having to go the DMV for health care?  About the End of Days scenario with the jobless swarming the streets and chaos erupting by the minute?  Are they talking about that?  Or is it just you?

Let me know when THEY are discussing it.  Then I might lend some credibility to it.  But when it is YOU discussing it, there is no credibility to be had.

I hardly view the board Crytalian possessing anything other than bullshit, hyperbole, and whining as worth listening to.

Carry on with the crying though.

Did you read the White Castle thread?
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 06, 2010, 01:00:11 PM
Did you read the White Castle thread?

Isn't this your typical response?

[crying] Did you read blah blah blah...some other bullshit thread[/crying]

[whining]Did you watch blah blah blah some crappy video..[/whining]

Your answer is to attempt to deflect to another thread?

Are you saying those economic experts talked about docs leaving their jobs, DMV offering health care, and jobless zombies are being discussed in the White Castle thread?  Is that it? 

"Hysterical"
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 06, 2010, 01:01:48 PM
Isn't this your typical response?

[crying] Did you read blah blah blah...some other bullshit thread[/crying]

[whining]Did you watch blah blah blah some crappy video..[/whining]

Your answer is to attempt to deflect to another thread?

"Hysterical"

Thank you.  Gave over - you lose. 
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 06, 2010, 01:05:19 PM
Hard to say I lose when you have been exposed once again as a whining bullshit artist on here.

 ::)

But hey, only you have to cope with your own reality as miserable as it is.  So whatever you have to do outside of professional help, I'm all for it.
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 06, 2010, 01:07:44 PM
Hard to say I lose when you have been exposed once again as a whining bullshit artist on here.

 ::)

But hey, only you have to cope with your own reality as miserable as it is.  So whatever you have to do outside of professional help, I'm all for it.

Oh really oh gay one?

The CFO/CEO from White Castle claiming ObamaCare will cause it to close stores and lay off people is hysterics from me? 

The CEO of many IHOPS saying the same thing is whining? 


 
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 06, 2010, 01:51:35 PM
Are you back to the gay stuff?  I think you secretly want me to be queer.  Your attraction is a bit creepy I have to say.  Unfortunately for you, if I were queer like you, I would only be attracted to men.  And that rules you out crybaby.
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 06, 2010, 01:54:09 PM
Are you back to the gay stuff?  I think you secretly want me to be queer.  Your attraction is a bit creepy I have to say.  Unfortunately for you, if I were queer like you, I would only be attracted to men.  And that rules you out crybaby.

So nothing to say about the White Castle or IHOP matter wherein the companies are saying ObamaCare is going to close down stores, result in less employees, etc ? 

Figures.

GAME OVER - YOU LOSE. 

     
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: 240 is Back on July 06, 2010, 01:56:21 PM
Ha ha asswipe. 

LOL @ the use of the word asswipe.  Always makes me smile.
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 06, 2010, 01:58:57 PM
Your only defense for calling out your daily bullshit, hyperbole and whining is to resort to "gay" remarks, but yet.. I lose?

 ::)

Excellent example of your delusions and typical bullshit.

Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Dos Equis on July 06, 2010, 02:01:35 PM
So much for transparency.
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 06, 2010, 02:05:55 PM
Your only defense for calling out your daily bullshit, hyperbole and whining is to resort to "gay" remarks, but yet.. I lose?

 ::)

Excellent example of your delusions and typical bullshit.



Again -

No defense of the WH in this story - FAIL

Refusal to read White Castle story - FAIL

When it comes to debating actual topics and discussing actual events, you are a few items short of a Happy Meal moron.



 

 
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: 240 is Back on July 06, 2010, 02:10:00 PM
The media is a lamestream lie machine, even far-right RINO radicals know that.  Their "gotcha" questions always lead to answers that are misconstrued.

Obama's just trying to keep them from skewing this story.  If you want to know what's new with the BP spill, ask the White House.  Gibbs will be reading the daily BP press release each day, keeping us all informed of the latest news.










 ;D
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 06, 2010, 02:14:06 PM
When WC actually closes, I will comment on it then.
So far, it is still open and nothing has happened.
Nothing.  Just like the docs walking out.
Just like DMV Health Care.
Just like the End of Days you cry about.

Nothing has happened.  Unlike you, I tend to prefer to discuss things that have merit and you know... actually a chance of happening.  So I will leave the fear mongering, the bullshit, the hyperbole and the "GAY obsession" stories up to you fatty.

Just because you live in a delusional little world it doesn't mean everybody else cares to visit.
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 06, 2010, 02:17:04 PM
When WC actually closes, I will comment on it then.
So far, it is still open and nothing has happened.
Nothing.  Just like the docs walking out.
Just like DMV Health Care.
Just like the End of Days you cry about.

Nothing has happened.  Unlike you, I tend to prefer to discuss things that have merit and you know... actually a chance of happening.  So I will leave the fear mongering, the bullshit, the hyperbole and the "GAY obsession" stories up to you fatty.

Just because you live in a delusional little world it doesn't mean everybody else cares to visit.

Right - so in your typical drug induced left wing utopia, you have to wait till the house burns down to tell the child not to play with matches.   ::)  ::)

Again - for the Nth time in this thread - why don't you at least make a token effort to defend the boy wonder you voted for in banning the press from covering this story?   
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: Skip8282 on July 06, 2010, 02:26:56 PM
Skip - check this out.  DHS is already starting it up. 

________________________ ________________________ ____________________

TSA to Block "Controversial Opinion" on the Web
Posted by Pia Malbran 69 comments .
Share993 20diggsdiggShareE-mailPrintFont .


 (Credit: CBS News) The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is blocking certain websites from the federal agency's computers, including halting access by staffers to any Internet pages that contain a "controversial opinion," according to an internal email obtained by CBS News.

The email was sent to all TSA employees from the Office of Information Technology on Friday afternoon.

It states that as of July 1, TSA employees will no longer be allowed to access five categories of websites that have been deemed "inappropriate for government access."

The categories include:

• Chat/Messaging

• Controversial opinion

• Criminal activity

• Extreme violence (including cartoon violence) and gruesome content

• Gaming

The email does not specify how the TSA will determine if a website expresses a "controversial opinion."

There is also no explanation as to why controversial opinions are being blocked, although the email stated that some of the restricted websites violate the Employee Responsibilities and Conduct policy.

The TSA did not return calls seeking comment by publication time.




Yeah, most of that is already blocked.  I can access GB, but I don't.  Normally I'm just way too busy.  As for controversial, I don't know but I would guess something like MensHealth.com may qualify.  There's a lot of interesting stuff on there, but there is also a lot of pics of sexy women not wearing a lot.

As to "who" decides, that one is easy.  It's the senior IT management and there is no consistency from agency to agency.  With DOD we can access facebook, my space, etc.  But Youtube is blocked, etc.

We can access during breaks and lunch, but shouldn't be on it otherwise.  Of course there is abuse, but not a lot that I know of (at least at DOD).  The reason is because they take your access away from you if you abuse the policy.  ALL your access.  And if you can't access the system, you can't do your job and it's grounds for immediate termination. 
Title: Re: Obama banning Press from covering the Gulf Spill?
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 07, 2010, 05:37:30 AM
Right - so in your typical drug induced left wing utopia, you have to wait till the house burns down to tell the child not to play with matches.   ::)  ::)

Again - for the Nth time in this thread - why don't you at least make a token effort to defend the boy wonder you voted for in banning the press from covering this story?   

Again, was it Obama or was it BP stipulations.  You don't have an answer for that.  Which isn't a surprise considering you don't have an answer for anything.


"Hysterical"