Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: JOHN MATRIX on August 23, 2010, 12:47:43 PM

Title: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on August 23, 2010, 12:47:43 PM
its an amazing ting this guy pulled off...considering he is 5-7 and his level of leanness there is no possible way he was any more than 160-165 in any rocky or rambo movie. he would be considered 'tiny' on getbig, and with clothed would probably look completely normal on the streets, yet he managed to successfully play the role of a Heavyweight boxing champion for like 6 movies as well as being commonly thought of as one of the biggest, toughest action heros around.

5-7 160-ish.

same with frank zane...listed as 5-9 (so that means probably 5'7 - 5-8)..never saw the upside of 175 lbs yet was a multitime mr olympia.
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Cleanest Natural on August 23, 2010, 12:52:35 PM
(http://www.moviecatcher.guy-and-sylvester-stallone22.jpg)
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: bodybuilder1234 on August 23, 2010, 12:56:56 PM
stallone is taller than 5'7.......probably 5'9

And he weighed in the 180 range in Rambo 3, he wasnt small.
he looked big here, 1:53 and onwards




Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Bobby on August 23, 2010, 01:10:30 PM
not even 5'9 with lifts...
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Captain Equipoise on August 23, 2010, 01:22:48 PM
stallone is taller than 5'7.......probably 5'9

And he weighed in the 180 range in Rambo 3, he wasnt small.
he looked big here, 1:53 and onwards






Not even close, that's called hollywood magic.. stallone wears lifts, there's tons of reports about people  saying he's 5'7 barefoot.. anybody can be 5'10 in 4" lifts
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 23, 2010, 01:31:11 PM
(http://www.moviecatcher.guy-and-sylvester-stallone22.jpg)

I bet Arnold hit that first
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: noworries on August 23, 2010, 01:34:31 PM
Honestly can anyone on here say they have actually met Sly.  And I don't mean you saw him across the floor at a club or restaurant.  I mean met him, talked to him, stood next to him, sat with him and talked.  Anyone on here.  I just can't see how people argue over this guys height and weight yet they have never met him.  Anyone can guess all they want.
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on August 23, 2010, 01:43:20 PM
Honestly can anyone on here say they have actually met Sly.  And I don't mean you saw him across the floor at a club or restaurant.  I mean met him, talked to him, stood next to him, sat with him and talked.  Anyone on here.  I just can't see how people argue over this guys height and weight yet they have never met him.  Anyone can guess all they want.

so what is the truth? i thought you yourself has said many times on here that he wears lifts and everyone's first impressions were 'wow hes short!' or 'wow hes small!'

also is it safe to say that at the time you two met you would have been more than capable of pressing stallone over your head and throwing him though a window?
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: MuscleMcMannus on August 23, 2010, 02:00:43 PM
It's just like Bob Chick......always stretching the truth about his height.
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: doison on August 23, 2010, 02:03:07 PM
its an amazing ting this guy pulled off...considering he is 5-7 and his level of leanness there is no possible way he was any more than 160-165 in any rocky or rambo movie. he would be considered 'tiny' on getbig, and with clothed would probably look completely normal on the streets, yet he managed to successfully play the role of a Heavyweight boxing champion for like 6 movies as well as being commonly thought of as one of the biggest, toughest action heros around.

5-7 160-ish.

same with frank zane...listed as 5-9 (so that means probably 5'7 - 5-8)..never saw the upside of 175 lbs yet was a multitime mr olympia.

I bet you cry a lot. 
Probably whimper too. 
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: noworries on August 23, 2010, 02:10:50 PM
so what is the truth? i thought you yourself has said many times on here that he wears lifts and everyone's first impressions were 'wow hes short!' or 'wow hes small!'

also is it safe to say that at the time you two met you would have been more than capable of pressing stallone over your head and throwing him though a window?

Unlike most of the people on here I have at least met him.  And I don't come on here and say how tall he is.  I do know he is shorter than me.  I would say by at least 4 to 5 inches.  And I am (or at least was) 6'1" (actually one line under).  So I would say 5'7".  Now he does wear lifts cause in the bathroom I saw them.  In all honesty I would have not even noticed her wore them.  With them on he was really close to my height where his eyes were just below mine.  He is very tiny in person (to at least me) I was even next to some girls who said when they saw him how small he was in person.  For over the top they used sand bags on the scale to make him weigh what they wanted.  I highly doubt he weighed 180.  I would say more like 170.  In that movie though I don't think he was as muscular as in other movies.  So he probably weighed more in those.  And when I met him I was in my strongest shape.  Nothing like the epitome of physiques like McAnusLicker  
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on August 23, 2010, 02:13:52 PM
stallone is taller than 5'7.......probably 5'9

And he weighed in the 180 range in Rambo 3, he wasnt small.
he looked big here, 1:53 and onwards







no he is NOT...........stallone is 5'5 and a half, 5'6 on a good day..........he made a career out of wearing custom made shoe-lifts


that picture, above, with him in venice with franco and arnold............if you see the full body shot. he is wearing custom made sneakers, with lifts




here is the photo..............those are the most obvious shoe lifts i have ever seen, notice how his foot is jacked up 2 or 3 inches within the shoe
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_qWfhpO6oxJE/S0aiG_wKvCI/AAAAAAAADdI/XksEHZG8c2o/s400/ArnoldandSlyStallone.jpg)

Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: MuscleMcMannus on August 23, 2010, 02:15:42 PM
Unlike most of the people on here I have at least met him.  And I don't come on here and say how tall he is.  I do know he is shorter than me.  I would say by at least 4 to 5 inches.  And I am (or at least was) 6'1" (actually one line under).  So I would say 5'7".  Now he does wear lifts cause in the bathroom I saw them.  In all honesty I would have not even noticed her wore them.  With them on he was really close to my height where his eyes were just below mine.  He is very tiny in person (to at least me) I was even next to some girls who said when they saw him how small he was in person.  For over the top they used sand bags on the scale to make him weigh what they wanted.  I highly doubt he weighed 180.  I would say more like 170.  In that movie though I don't think he was as muscular as in other movies.  So he probably weighed more in those.  And when I met him I was in my strongest shape.  Nothing like the epitome of physiques like McAnusLicker  

Hey doughboy are you related to this guy?
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Nirvana on August 23, 2010, 02:17:27 PM
(http://www.moviecatcher.guy-and-sylvester-stallone22.jpg)
dwarfing columbo
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on August 23, 2010, 02:47:07 PM
Unlike most of the people on here I have at least met him.  And I don't come on here and say how tall he is.  I do know he is shorter than me.  I would say by at least 4 to 5 inches.  And I am (or at least was) 6'1" (actually one line under).  So I would say 5'7".  Now he does wear lifts cause in the bathroom I saw them.  In all honesty I would have not even noticed her wore them.  With them on he was really close to my height where his eyes were just below mine.  He is very tiny in person (to at least me) I was even next to some girls who said when they saw him how small he was in person.  For over the top they used sand bags on the scale to make him weigh what they wanted.  I highly doubt he weighed 180.  I would say more like 170.  In that movie though I don't think he was as muscular as in other movies.  So he probably weighed more in those.  And when I met him I was in my strongest shape.  Nothing like the epitome of physiques like McAnusLicker  

so you confirmed what i thought exactly  ;D

also you did not address the part about whether or not you could have pressed him overhead and thrown him through a window...
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: noworries on August 23, 2010, 03:35:34 PM
so you confirmed what i thought exactly  ;D

also you did not address the part about whether or not you could have pressed him overhead and thrown him through a window...

hahaha very easy
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Nails on August 23, 2010, 03:48:55 PM
(http://twincities.metromix.com/content_image/full/839105/560/370)
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Lundgren on August 23, 2010, 07:24:34 PM
Don't like the Arnold/Stallone comparison there two different. Stallone got medicore looks, small size, and medicore acting ability, he's very good hollywood badass. Arnold can't act at all, is good looking, is huge, and has three other successful careers on the side. Stallone got epic movies, Arnold got a epic life.
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: drmarkp on August 23, 2010, 09:33:04 PM
its an amazing ting this guy pulled off...considering he is 5-7 and his level of leanness there is no possible way he was any more than 160-165 in any rocky or rambo movie. he would be considered 'tiny' on getbig, and with clothed would probably look completely normal on the streets, yet he managed to successfully play the role of a Heavyweight boxing champion for like 6 movies as well as being commonly thought of as one of the biggest, toughest action heros around.

5-7 160-ish.

same with frank zane...listed as 5-9 (so that means probably 5'7 - 5-8)..never saw the upside of 175 lbs yet was a multitime mr olympia.

I'm exactly 5'7 1/2 and Frank Zane towered over me.
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Matt C on August 23, 2010, 11:09:28 PM

no he is NOT...........stallone is 5'5 and a half, 5'6 on a good day..........he made a career out of wearing custom made shoe-lifts


that picture, above, with him in venice with franco and arnold............if you see the full body shot. he is wearing custom made sneakers, with lifts




here is the photo..............those are the most obvious shoe lifts i have ever seen, notice how his foot is jacked up 2 or 3 inches within the shoe
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_qWfhpO6oxJE/S0aiG_wKvCI/AAAAAAAADdI/XksEHZG8c2o/s400/ArnoldandSlyStallone.jpg)



I wake up in the morning basically 5'9 bang on, sometimes maybe 5'9 and 1/5.  At night I shrink to around 5'8 and 1/2, sometimes a bit lower if I have been sitting at my computer all day.  I don't mind wearing a pair of shoes with chunkier heels [typically I just wear sneakers though to be honest], but I would never want to wear anything that results in such a drastic increase in height.  If someone sees me and thinks I am 5'10 due to footwear, that is fine, but could you imagine someone thinking I was 6'0 just to find out that I am 5'9?  It would be pretty deceitful in my opinion.  I would not ever wear shoes which offer that much of a height advantage.
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Meso_z on August 24, 2010, 06:14:53 AM
its an amazing ting this guy pulled off...considering he is 5-7 and his level of leanness there is no possible way he was any more than 160-165 in any rocky or rambo movie. he would be considered 'tiny' on getbig, and with clothed would probably look completely normal on the streets, yet he managed to successfully play the role of a Heavyweight boxing champion for like 6 movies as well as being commonly thought of as one of the biggest, toughest action heros around.

5-7 160-ish.

same with frank zane...listed as 5-9 (so that means probably 5'7 - 5-8)..never saw the upside of 175 lbs yet was a multitime mr olympia.

he didnt have striated glutes either.

 ::)

wtf who the fuck cares what he weighted "in his prime"?
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Lundgren on August 24, 2010, 06:37:16 AM
I wake up in the morning basically 5'9 bang on, sometimes maybe 5'9 and 1/5.  At night I shrink to around 5'8 and 1/2, sometimes a bit lower if I have been sitting at my computer all day.  I don't mind wearing a pair of shoes with chunkier heels [typically I just wear sneakers though to be honest], but I would never want to wear anything that results in such a drastic increase in height.  If someone sees me and thinks I am 5'10 due to footwear, that is fine, but could you imagine someone thinking I was 6'0 just to find out that I am 5'9?  It would be pretty deceitful in my opinion.  I would not ever wear shoes which offer that much of a height advantage.
  Lol I know what you mean, could you imagine wearing a rubber muscle suit just to make you look bigger. People would think your nuts or atleast have a severe self esteem issues. Stallone has some very micheal jackson like qualities. He's in deal of being a midget, denial of his age, and will properly die of a heat attack in the next year or two.
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on August 24, 2010, 06:49:11 AM
An article from Copley News also reveals that an Italian shoemaker has a few secrets about stars and their heights. Regarding Sylvester Stallone he says: "I made him 4.5 inches taller for 16 years!"


even all his sneakers are custom made with built-in lifts............look the size of these, they look like moonboots

(http://www.contactmusic.com/pics/lb/sylvester_stallone_271008/sylvester_stallone_2140644.jpg)
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Agnostic007 on August 24, 2010, 07:09:27 AM
  Lol I know what you mean, could you imagine wearing a rubber muscle suit just to make you look bigger. People would think your nuts or atleast have a severe self esteem issues. Stallone has some very micheal jackson like qualities. He's in deal of being a midget, denial of his age, and will properly die of a heat attack in the next year or two.

I bet he wishes he were you..
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: kevcat on August 24, 2010, 07:10:19 AM
The guys a multi millionaire and probably banged more sluts than anybody on here, and probably has a better physique.Do u think he actually cares what you people think of his shoe lifts?  ::)
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: vic86 on August 24, 2010, 10:13:11 AM
Unlike most of the people on here I have at least met him.  And I don't come on here and say how tall he is.  I do know he is shorter than me.  I would say by at least 4 to 5 inches.  And I am (or at least was) 6'1" (actually one line under).  So I would say 5'7".  Now he does wear lifts cause in the bathroom I saw them.  In all honesty I would have not even noticed her wore them.  With them on he was really close to my height where his eyes were just below mine.  He is very tiny in person (to at least me) I was even next to some girls who said when they saw him how small he was in person.  For over the top they used sand bags on the scale to make him weigh what they wanted.  I highly doubt he weighed 180.  I would say more like 170.  In that movie though I don't think he was as muscular as in other movies.  So he probably weighed more in those.  And when I met him I was in my strongest shape.  Nothing like the epitome of physiques like McAnusLicker  
wow in which year was this ?noworries :)
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Lundgren on August 24, 2010, 10:21:46 AM
The guys a multi millionaire and probably banged more sluts than anybody on here, and probably has a better physique.Do u think he actually cares what you people think of his shoe lifts?  ::)
This is pretty interesting reasoning. He dosen't care what I think yet he still wears those shoes to appear taller. Hmmm maybe he just thinks there so comfortable.
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Agnostic007 on August 24, 2010, 10:46:00 AM
This is pretty interesting reasoning. He dosen't care what I think yet he still wears those shoes to appear taller. Hmmm maybe he just thinks there so comfortable.

I've always figured it was something he did for the job. In Hollywood image is everything and while he doesn't care what you or I think about him, he probably cared what the studio execs casting movies thought and tall is in..
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Lundgren on August 25, 2010, 08:34:18 AM
I've always figured it was something he did for the job. In Hollywood image is everything and while he doesn't care what you or I think about him, he probably cared what the studio execs casting movies thought and tall is in..

I guess maybe your right. I never thought about it like that. I always thought he was rich famous and well connected in hollywood and got whatever role he wants.
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Captain Equipoise on August 25, 2010, 09:22:01 AM
I've always figured it was something he did for the job. In Hollywood image is everything and while he doesn't care what you or I think about him, he probably cared what the studio execs casting movies thought and tall is in..

If hollywood cared so much about the tall the pretty boys of the 80's and 90's wouldn't all have been under 5'9

tom cruise, brad pitt, sylvester stallone, jean claude van damme, antonio banderas, etc. etc.
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on August 25, 2010, 10:47:54 AM
If hollywood cared so much about the tall the pretty boys of the 80's and 90's wouldn't all have been under 5'9

tom cruise, brad pitt, sylvester stallone, jean claude van damme, antonio banderas, etc. etc.



right the fact of the matter is, everything in hollywood is an illusion........you can make sly look 7 feet tall if you want, depending on the angles you shoot him at, adn who yyou surround him with...........thats why it doesnt matter that most of them are short
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on August 25, 2010, 10:56:41 AM
If hollywood cared so much about the tall the pretty boys of the 80's and 90's wouldn't all have been under 5'9

tom cruise, brad pitt, sylvester stallone, jean claude van damme, antonio banderas, etc. etc.


this is one reason why steven segal is awesome, he actually is 6-4, actually can(could) kick people's asses, and actually is an expert handgun shooter. haha
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on August 25, 2010, 11:01:56 AM
this is one reason why steven segal is awesome, he actually is 6-4, actually can(could) kick people's asses, and actually is an expert handgun shooter. haha

steven segal is a fat, ghoul who practiced a form of martial arts that was more akin to dancing


he walks like lex steel just sodomized him

and he has completely lost his mind
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: The Ugly on August 25, 2010, 11:26:50 AM
Italian shoemaker says: "I made him 4.5 inches taller for 16 years!"

4.5"?

Musta been back when Sly rocked these:
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Lundgren on August 25, 2010, 11:37:06 AM
If hollywood cared so much about the tall the pretty boys of the 80's and 90's wouldn't all have been under 5'9

tom cruise, brad pitt, sylvester stallone, jean claude van damme, antonio banderas, etc. etc.

That's a pretty selective list. Some are above average height and some are below. Your leaving out Arnold, Keanu reeves, Brendan frasier, Dicaprio, ben afleck, and the list goes on.









Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on August 25, 2010, 11:41:32 AM
4.5"?

Musta been back when Sly rocked these:

those would make him 6 or 7 inches taller


like this custom made sneakers his is wearing in this photo, you can make shoes that quietly give you a solid 3 or 4 inches


just picture where his heel would be in those moonboots he calls sneakers........i drew a red line where his actual foot would be in those shoes






Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Danimal77 on August 26, 2010, 01:44:26 AM
its an amazing ting this guy pulled off...considering he is 5-7 and his level of leanness there is no possible way he was any more than 160-165 in any rocky or rambo movie. he would be considered 'tiny' on getbig, and with clothed would probably look completely normal on the streets, yet he managed to successfully play the role of a Heavyweight boxing champion for like 6 movies as well as being commonly thought of as one of the biggest, toughest action heros around.

5-7 160-ish.

same with frank zane...listed as 5-9 (so that means probably 5'7 - 5-8)..never saw the upside of 175 lbs yet was a multitime mr olympia.

In reality he's never been over 5'8".... As for his weight, well, it's been all over the place. In Rocky I (mid 70's), he was bulked up quite a bit and was a legit 190... Rocky 2, even though he was billed at 200 pounds, he seemed to be in that 175-180 range. Rocky 3 he stated he went down from 170-175 to 155-160 pounds... For Copland, he went from 172 to 212 and for Rocky Balboa he went up to a legit 219 pounds... As for what he carried on average, it's in the 170-175 pound range...
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: noworries on August 26, 2010, 10:41:58 AM
In reality he's never been over 5'8".... As for his weight, well, it's been all over the place. In Rocky I (mid 70's), he was bulked up quite a bit and was a legit 190... Rocky 2, even though he was billed at 200 pounds, he seemed to be in that 175-180 range. Rocky 3 he stated he went down from 170-175 to 155-160 pounds... For Copland, he went from 172 to 212 and for Rocky Balboa he went up to a legit 219 pounds... As for what he carried on average, it's in the 170-175 pound range...

I think he was probably heavier than ever in Lords of Flatbush
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Remo Williams on August 26, 2010, 12:15:45 PM
The guys a multi millionaire and probably banged more sluts than anybody on here, and probably has a better physique.Do u think he actually cares what you people think of his shoe lifts?  ::)

Exactly.

You'd think people would have better things to do in their lives than squabble over height, his weight and shoe lifts.

And Stallone wasn't ever aspiring to be bodybuilder or be the largest movie hero on screen.

I liked his films and he looked good in most of them.
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: dr.chimps on August 26, 2010, 12:18:47 PM
4.5"?

Musta been back when Sly rocked these:
LOL. Those be Gene Simmons,' circa Destroyer.
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Danimal77 on August 26, 2010, 01:43:13 PM
I think he was probably heavier than ever in Lords of Flatbush

Probably around 200 pounds in the early 70's.. He leaned out throughout the 1970's and by the new decade he looked completely different..
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Master Blaster on August 26, 2010, 01:49:00 PM
steven segal is a fat, ghoul who practiced a form of martial arts that was more akin to dancing


he walks like lex steel just sodomized him

and he has completely lost his mind

Does he have any flaws?
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Lundgren on August 26, 2010, 02:38:49 PM
Probably around 200 pounds in the early 70's.. He leaned out throughout the 1970's and by the new decade he looked completely different..
200 pounds at 5 7 for him ain't possible without looking like a fat tub.
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: noworries on August 26, 2010, 03:11:32 PM
In reality he's never been over 5'8".... As for his weight, well, it's been all over the place. In Rocky I (mid 70's), he was bulked up quite a bit and was a legit 190... Rocky 2, even though he was billed at 200 pounds, he seemed to be in that 175-180 range. Rocky 3 he stated he went down from 170-175 to 155-160 pounds... For Copland, he went from 172 to 212 and for Rocky Balboa he went up to a legit 219 pounds... As for what he carried on average, it's in the 170-175 pound range...
Not sure where you get this info.  When he is as ripped as he ever has been I highly doubt he was near 200.  219 is a joke right?  Have you ever seen him in person, stood next to him and seen with your own eyes how small he is.  The way you type I don't think so.  His joints are so small and his arms even when muscular are not more than 17" if that.  Sorry 219 is a number that just doesn't compute
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: MuscleMcMannus on August 26, 2010, 04:19:41 PM
Boom!
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Lord of the Roidz on August 26, 2010, 05:47:08 PM
I hope this pic is shopped. I was always impressed with him until I just saw this pic of his calves. Here I've always admired the guy's discipline and now I see he's like all these tools  at my gym that avoid calf machines like they were the plague. Damn I'm depressed.
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: Howard on August 26, 2010, 06:41:10 PM
You really ahve been around the movie crowd and done some stunt work and bit parts haven't you?
I respect that but sadly most of the wordly studs on get big, know so much more than a guy that walked the walk.
Post some more pics, I liked that one where you played a part in a gorilla suit?

Unlike most of the people on here I have at least met him.  And I don't come on here and say how tall he is.  I do know he is shorter than me.  I would say by at least 4 to 5 inches.  And I am (or at least was) 6'1" (actually one line under).  So I would say 5'7".  Now he does wear lifts cause in the bathroom I saw them.  In all honesty I would have not even noticed her wore them.  With them on he was really close to my height where his eyes were just below mine.  He is very tiny in person (to at least me) I was even next to some girls who said when they saw him how small he was in person.  For over the top they used sand bags on the scale to make him weigh what they wanted.  I highly doubt he weighed 180.  I would say more like 170.  In that movie though I don't think he was as muscular as in other movies.  So he probably weighed more in those.  And when I met him I was in my strongest shape.  Nothing like the epitome of physiques like McAnusLicker  
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: NaturalWonder83 on August 26, 2010, 06:54:31 PM
i have a friend that is a big sly fan
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: _bruce_ on August 30, 2010, 08:38:41 AM
He never had any legs.
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: BIG_STI on August 30, 2010, 08:42:04 AM
always thought it was BS when he claimed to be over 200lbs in shape, never looked more than 180 tops
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on August 30, 2010, 04:49:49 PM
I hope this pic is shopped. I was always impressed with him until I just saw this pic of his calves. Here I've always admired the guy's discipline and now I see he's like all these tools  at my gym that avoid calf machines like they were the plague. Damn I'm depressed.

from the ages 40 thru 60-whatever he is now Stallone has only trained forearms.

he has trained forearms intensively for the last 20 years, and nothing else.
Title: Re: Stallone was never above 165lbs in his prime
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 30, 2010, 06:19:10 PM
from the ages 40 thru 60-whatever he is now Stallone has only trained forearms.

he has trained forearms intensively for the last 20 years, and nothing else.

 ;D