Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: tallgerman on November 26, 2010, 12:45:53 PM

Title: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: tallgerman on November 26, 2010, 12:45:53 PM
Just saying

the short dummy with too big delts was saying some crazy shit on some video someone posted here

I was like don't worry abut it son, you never reached arnold anyhow.

Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: tallgerman on November 26, 2010, 01:11:22 PM
(http://deathby1000papercuts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/arnold-schwarzenegger.jpg)
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Captain Equipoise on November 26, 2010, 01:15:37 PM
superb technique in the sieg heil
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: _bruce_ on November 26, 2010, 02:33:55 PM
Adolph must have been peeking out of a cloud with tears of joy running down his face.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Wiggs on November 26, 2010, 02:43:42 PM
Actually Arnold is on record stating Flex is the best bodybuilder he has EVER seen....He said it after on of Flex's Arnold Classic wins...I believe it was the 98 Arnold...This was pre-synthol Flex.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: hench on November 26, 2010, 02:58:11 PM
yea but then he didnt get to see himself how everyone else did.
Actually Arnold is on record stating Flex is the best bodybuilder he has EVER seen....He said it after on of Flex's Arnold Classic wins...I believe it was the 98 Arnold...This was pre-synthol Flex.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Wiggs on November 26, 2010, 03:00:59 PM
yea but then he didnt get to see himself how everyone else did.

You mean overrated?  Cause that's what he certainly his as a bodybuilder...Take away his accolades and people wouldn't but on the nuts of Arnold as much.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Pollux on November 26, 2010, 03:15:00 PM
First of all, when makin' a title thread including Arnold's name, make sure you CAP it, sucka!  >:(
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Captain Equipoise on November 26, 2010, 03:41:25 PM
Adolph must have been peeking out of a cloud with tears of joy running down his face.

Seriously, if Arnold had been alive during the early 40's we'd all be speaking Deutsche right now..
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: tbombz on November 26, 2010, 04:06:49 PM
That's a dumb thing to say. Flex outweighed Arnold by 40 lbs or more at about 5 % lower body fat too, along with more pleasing aesthetics, more striations, more x frame.. Etc etc
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Nirvana on November 26, 2010, 04:10:13 PM
That's a dumb thing to say. Flex outweighed Arnold by 40 lbs or more at about 5 % lower body fat too, along with more pleasing aesthetics, more striations, more x frame.. Etc etc
:o
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: tbombz on November 26, 2010, 04:12:29 PM
:o
Well, he looked like it at least.  ;D
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: SomeKindofMonster on November 26, 2010, 04:15:27 PM
Actually Arnold is on record stating Flex is the best bodybuilder he has EVER seen....He said it after on of Flex's Arnold Classic wins...I believe it was the 98 Arnold...This was pre-synthol Flex.

The one problem that Flex had is his torso thickness and fullness suffered when he
got in extreme condition. The pictures of Flex from the AC 1993 are incredible but in the actual video
he is less impressive. Paul Dillett made him look like a child but Paul's poor back permanently  sealed his fate. I also have the 1998 AC video where Flex is around 236; 1993 AC 216; and I am overall more impressed
with his 1998 Arnold look - on video anyway. He was very ripped but with added size.
If flex could have retained the thickness and fullness in his back and chest that he had at the 1993 Ironman with the condition of the 1993 AC he may have been unbeatable. He never attained this look though.
His closest was the 1998 AC.
I think Flex was using synthol in 1998 but it was barely noticeable on the 1998 AC video.
A 1973 or 1974 Arnold or a 1993/1998 AC Flex is almost a tossup. Flex lacked some torso balance
and Arnold needed a tad more leg development.
Regardless, Two of the greatest physiques to ever grace the stage.
A 1974 Arnold capture from youtube...
Check out Arnolds supposedly weak triceps..

  
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: RocketSwitch625 on November 26, 2010, 04:20:53 PM
Actually Arnold is on record stating Flex is the best bodybuilder he has EVER seen....He said it after on of Flex's Arnold Classic wins...I believe it was the 98 Arnold...This was pre-synthol Flex.

It's what Wheeler claimed arnold said to him after the contest and it was before 98. I think it was 93. Anyway, it was at the same contest when Arnold said that Wheeler had "world record measurements". LOL
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Wiggs on November 26, 2010, 04:21:13 PM
The one problem that Flex had is his torso thickness and fullness suffered when he
got in extreme condition. The pictures of Flex from the AC 1993 are incredible but in the actual video
he is less impressive. Paul Dillett made him look like a child but Paul's poor back permanently  sealed his fate. I also have the 1998 AC video where Flex is around 236; 1993 AC 216; and I am overall more impressed
with his 1998 Arnold look - on video anyway. He was very ripped but with added size.
If flex could have retained the thickness and fullness in his back and chest that he had at the 1993 Ironman with the condition of the 1993 AC he may have been unbeatable. He never attained this look though.
His closest was the 1998 AC.
I think Flex was using synthol in 1998 but it was barely noticeable on the 1998 AC video.
A 1973 or 1974 Arnold or a 1993/1998 AC Flex is almost a tossup. Flex lacked some torso balance
and Arnold needed a tad more leg development.
Regardless, Two of the greatest physiques to ever grace the stage.
A 1974 Arnold capture from youtube...
Check out Arnolds supposedly weak triceps..

  

I've been looking for a copy of the 98 Arnold Classic for years...Do you mind posting it or at least the Flex parts?
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: SomeKindofMonster on November 26, 2010, 04:45:58 PM
It's what Wheeler claimed arnold said to him after the contest and it was before 98. I think it was 93. Anyway, it was at the same contest when Arnold said that Wheeler had "world record measurements". LOL

Yes, That was 1993 and Arnold was kind of being sly at calling bullshit to what Flex was saying without
coming right out and saying it.
Flex was saying his waist was 27 inches and his arms were 22 1/2 and his legs were 32 inches.
Just outrageous claims considering how big Flex actually was in contest shape.
BTW-Those measurements may not be verbatim but what Flex said was very close.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: SomeKindofMonster on November 26, 2010, 04:48:06 PM
I've been looking for a copy of the 98 Arnold Classic for years...Do you mind posting it or at least the Flex parts?

Hey Wiggs,
I'll message you on the footage.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Wiggs on November 26, 2010, 04:48:52 PM
Hey Wiggs,
I'll message you on the footage.

Thanks
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: First Blood on November 26, 2010, 04:50:26 PM
someone should scan some cool flex magazine articles from the 90s.

could be a cool thread!

anyone got any jean pierre fux training articles?  8)

Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Nirvana on November 26, 2010, 04:55:13 PM
someone should scan some cool flex magazine articles from the 90s.

could be a cool thread!

anyone got any jean pierre fux training articles?  8)


I got most but no scanner
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Cableguy on November 26, 2010, 04:59:23 PM
The one problem that Flex had is his torso thickness and fullness suffered when he
got in extreme condition. The pictures of Flex from the AC 1993 are incredible but in the actual video
he is less impressive. Paul Dillett made him look like a child but Paul's poor back permanently  sealed his fate. I also have the 1998 AC video where Flex is around 236; 1993 AC 216; and I am overall more impressed
with his 1998 Arnold look - on video anyway. He was very ripped but with added size.
If flex could have retained the thickness and fullness in his back and chest that he had at the 1993 Ironman with the condition of the 1993 AC he may have been unbeatable. He never attained this look though.
His closest was the 1998 AC.
I think Flex was using synthol in 1998 but it was barely noticeable on the 1998 AC video.
A 1973 or 1974 Arnold or a 1993/1998 AC Flex is almost a tossup. Flex lacked some torso balance
and Arnold needed a tad more leg development.
Regardless, Two of the greatest physiques to ever grace the stage.
A 1974 Arnold capture from youtube...
Check out Arnolds supposedly weak triceps..

  

Arnold didn't have weak triceps. His peaked bi's just overpowered them when he flexed them.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: First Blood on November 26, 2010, 05:01:15 PM
I got most but no scanner

I got a scanner but not that many flex magazines from the 90s  :)

I know flex is not the best information source but I like to use it as a source of inspiration...to fuel my workouts same with bodybuilding videos.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Captain Equipoise on November 26, 2010, 06:42:33 PM
Yes, That was 1993 and Arnold was kind of being sly at calling bullshit to what Flex was saying without
coming right out and saying it.
Flex was saying his waist was 27 inches and his arms were 22 1/2 and his legs were 32 inches.
Just outrageous claims considering how big Flex actually was in contest shape.
BTW-Those measurements may not be verbatim but what Flex said was very close.

Holy shit, your recollection of shit flex said in 1993 is honestly disturbing, I recommend you go outside, maybe talk to someone

there are schmoes and then there are SCHMOES...wow
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Alexander D on November 26, 2010, 06:45:46 PM
Flex never won the Mr. O because he trained like a bitch... this is FACT.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Nirvana on November 26, 2010, 07:00:50 PM
Flex never won the Mr. O because he trained like a bitch... this is FACT.
haha yeah his training clips were very uninspiring. 
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: tallgerman on November 27, 2010, 02:52:11 AM
That's a dumb thing to say. Flex outweighed Arnold by 40 lbs or more at about 5 % lower body fat too, along with more pleasing aesthetics, more striations, more x frame.. Etc etc


naa naaa and more naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: mass243 on November 27, 2010, 05:09:02 AM
Flex always arrived at Gold's Venice in TOP style. For sure better way than anybody else - including Arnold.

Flex looked like if he owned not only the place but people inside also.

At 0:04 baby!                     8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)

Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Robert_Lopez on November 27, 2010, 12:37:19 PM
I've been looking for a copy of the 98 Arnold Classic for years...Do you mind posting it or at least the Flex parts?

Isn't it strange that there are no videos anywhere on the 98 Arnold, I was there in person & have to say that was the craziest combination of symetry size & definition Iv'e ever seen!!!
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Captain Equipoise on November 27, 2010, 12:51:01 PM
Flex always arrived at Gold's Venice in TOP style. For sure better way than anybody else - including Arnold.

Flex looked like if he owned not only the place but people inside also.

At 0:04 baby!                     8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)



what a ghetto piece of shit, Arnold had class.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Wiggs on November 27, 2010, 01:04:53 PM
Isn't it strange that there are no videos anywhere on the 98 Arnold, I was there in person & have to say that was the craziest combination of symetry size & definition Iv'e ever seen!!!

Yep...I've contact EVERY bodybuilding video distributor over the last 10 years including when I was at the Olympia expo this year and no one has ever seen it or had it...
I don't know what that's all about, especially since it was Wheeler at his best.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 27, 2010, 01:22:58 PM
He looked better in 1993
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Wiggs on November 27, 2010, 01:31:06 PM
He looked better in 1993

False...too small.  I'll let the video be judge when I receive it.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 27, 2010, 01:34:58 PM
False...too small.  I'll let the video be judge when I receive it.


if by small you mean totally dried out and exhibiting nothing but pure dense muscle it's not a bad thing

Flex was never the same after 1993 , his rookie year he looked his best at the Ironman , Arnold  
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Parker on November 27, 2010, 04:03:17 PM
Isn't it strange that there are no videos anywhere on the 98 Arnold, I was there in person & have to say that was the craziest combination of symetry size & definition Iv'e ever seen!!!
It was done on UPN, both the 98 and 99 and I think the 2000 were aired on UPN, remixed and called Arnold Rock n roll or something like that. Just as there is only the 19 sec video of Flex for the 1993 Arnold, what gives? Is there some sort of copyright issue, where there are virtually no video of the 90s and early 2000s Arnold Classic videos that can be released
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Wiggs on November 27, 2010, 04:09:51 PM
my favorite Flex magazine cover...no homo.

http://backissues.com/issue/Flex-June-1998

Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Jaime on November 27, 2010, 04:20:28 PM
Flex was way too narrow and had way too much of a shitty chest to compete with Arnold.

Arnold had his faults but Flex's were more pronounced.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Parker on November 27, 2010, 04:28:03 PM
He looked better in 1993
And it was said, that if he showed up in this condition, that he would have won Mr. O in 1998. Do you agree?
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 27, 2010, 04:32:34 PM
And it was said, that if he showed up in this condition, that he would have won Mr. O in 1998. Do you agree?


Actually he said if he showed at the Olympia in 98 like he did at the 1998 Arnold he would have won and I think either showing he would have beaten Ronnie 1998 especially with gyno

quote Flex magazine Jan 1999

When Ronnie is 100% , Flex has to be 100% to prevail. On October 10 , 1998 , Flex wasn't and Ronnie was.


Flex Wheeler

It's true I didn't quite duplicate my condition at the Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic. if I'd been able to do that , I would have won EASILY !!
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Wiggs on November 27, 2010, 04:36:25 PM
Flex at the 98 Ironman, 2 weeks before the Arnold Classic...incredible condition...he was even better at the Arnold but the pics don't show it...When I get the video I'll post only that portion of the show.


Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Wiggs on November 27, 2010, 04:42:15 PM
BTW no one was beating Ronald that year...Even if Flex was 100% Ronnie was 25 lbs larger with better condition...98 Ronnie destroys anything Flex ever brought to the stage he took away Flex's greatest asset, his back and back then Ronald's symmetry was very similar to Flex....Ronnie was flex with better arms, back, width but funky abs and shitty calves, Ronnie FTW easily...
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Ex Coelis on November 27, 2010, 04:47:41 PM


awesome routine

Kai should take notes
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: SusanFitness on November 27, 2010, 05:00:46 PM
hahaa, there's no way on god's green earth that Arnold could hold a candle to a peak Flex.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Wiggs on November 27, 2010, 05:04:03 PM
hahaa, there's no way on god's green earth that Arnold could hold a candle to a peak Flex.

Loyal Arnold nuthuggers stuck on the Aryan BS and his credentials outside of bodybuilding...
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: SomeKindofMonster on November 27, 2010, 05:28:39 PM
Holy shit, your recollection of shit flex said in 1993 is honestly disturbing, I recommend you go outside, maybe talk to someone

there are schmoes and then there are SCHMOES...wow


My recollection was almost spot on asshole. I got the tape out and here is
what he said as measurements...
22 1/2 arms
legs -31 inch
waist -27 1/2
chest -right around 56 inches
Arnold says -the measurements your saying right now are world record measurements, right?
 
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Reeves on November 27, 2010, 05:31:58 PM
There's no doubt flex was bigger ... more defined.

But if I had seen a picture of this:

(http://www.isteroids.com/bodybuilding/images/flex_wheeler2.jpg)

vs this:

(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/gallery/musclegallery1/m61.jpg)

When I was young and impressionable, I would probably never have picked up a barbell.

Arnold still looks human ... Then you add in the factor that Arnold was a real strength athlete (deadlifted over 700lbs, etc) ... He gets my vote!


Flex is full of oil and tiny in height.  Arnold has mass and class with the necessary height to carry it well.  Arnold all the way.  Including against such tubs of oil as Ronnie Coleslaw and Dorian Wastes. ;D
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Ex Coelis on November 27, 2010, 05:40:27 PM
My recollection was almost spot on asshole


I think that was his point
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Parker on November 27, 2010, 05:41:41 PM
Flex is full of oil and tiny in height.  Arnold has mass and class with the necessary height to carry it well.  Arnold all the way.  Including against such tubs of oil as Ronnie Coleslaw and Dorian Wastes. ;D
1993 Flex Wheeler Crushes Arnold
(http://www.anabolic-steroids.blogspot.com/flex-wheeler.jpg)
(http://www.basketball.de/picture.php?albumid=10&pictureid=190)
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 27, 2010, 05:57:50 PM
BTW no one was beating Ronald that year...Even if Flex was 100% Ronnie was 25 lbs larger with better condition...98 Ronnie destroys anything Flex ever brought to the stage he took away Flex's greatest asset, his back and back then Ronald's symmetry was very similar to Flex....Ronnie was flex with better arms, back, width but funky abs and shitty calves, Ronnie FTW easily...

Flex took Ronnie to the limit that year and he was off never mind 100% that bitch-tits would be the deciding factor for a Flex win

and better arms? you mean better biceps because Flex's tris kill Ronnies , back width? Ronnie was always wider than Flex

Flex at his best just outclasses Ronnie 1998
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 27, 2010, 05:59:11 PM
1993 Flex Wheeler Crushes Arnold
(http://www.anabolic-steroids.blogspot.com/flex-wheeler.jpg)
(http://www.basketball.de/picture.php?albumid=10&pictureid=190)


He really does but it's not a fair comparison by any stretch
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 27, 2010, 06:02:52 PM
 :o
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: tallgerman on November 27, 2010, 06:13:30 PM
There's no doubt flex was bigger ... more defined.

But if I had seen a picture of this:

(http://www.isteroids.com/bodybuilding/images/flex_wheeler2.jpg)

vs this:

(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/gallery/musclegallery1/m61.jpg)

When I was young and impressionable, I would probably never have picked up a barbell.

Arnold still looks human ... Then you add in the factor that Arnold was a real strength athlete (deadlifted over 700lbs, etc) ... He gets my vote!


mroe defined? no
shorter not bigger yes?
delts way too big and chest to small yes
arnold owns flex
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on November 27, 2010, 06:30:21 PM
oh brother, Synthol 'all drugs' Wheeler couldnt hold a candle to the great Arnold.

the ONLY thing he had on him was shreddedness and thats only due to modern diuretic drugs and abuse
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on November 27, 2010, 06:35:27 PM
still the gold standard of Tall White Superior Ary an genetics  8)
(http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/46514000/jpg/_46514357_arnie.jpg)
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: SomeKindofMonster on November 27, 2010, 09:31:02 PM
I think that was his point

Yes you are correct. I've always had a great memory when it came to anything
but it seems my reading comprehension skills were lacking on this one.
Anyway, here's a link to some screen caps from the 1993 AC.
I think my copy is in better shape and I'll make some caps of my own at some point
of both the 93 and 98 AC. The pics from 98 don't do the video version of flex justice.
Here's the link to the 93 AC caps...

http://www.musclemecca.com/showthread.php/193775-Flex-Wheeler-1993-Arnold-Classic-PICS-!!!?highlight=flex+wheeler (http://www.musclemecca.com/showthread.php/193775-Flex-Wheeler-1993-Arnold-Classic-PICS-!!!?highlight=flex+wheeler)
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: SomeKindofMonster on November 27, 2010, 09:36:24 PM
It was done on UPN, both the 98 and 99 and I think the 2000 were aired on UPN, remixed and called Arnold Rock n roll or something like that. Just as there is only the 19 sec video of Flex for the 1993 Arnold, what gives? Is there some sort of copyright issue, where there are virtually no video of the 90s and early 2000s Arnold Classic videos that can be released

You are correct on the 1998 AC - it is called Arnold's Rock and Roll Bodybuilding. I don't know about 99, 2000.
The 2000 AC is covered on a documentary on youtube called the greatest bodies.

Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: WillGrant on November 27, 2010, 09:38:09 PM
Arnold on the protocols of today would still be the best.

Remember without Arnold there would be no Flex Wheeler , he inspired so many to even think about picking up a Barbell.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Jaime on November 28, 2010, 04:52:19 AM
1993 Flex Wheeler Crushes Arnold




1993 Flex has a shitty chest, is extremely narrow and has zero taper.

Arnold doesn't look like a mutant so wins by default.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Parker on November 28, 2010, 05:09:31 AM

1993 Flex has a shitty chest, is extremely narrow and has zero taper.

Arnold doesn't look like a mutant so wins by default.
Flex had one of the best tapers out there...he was effectively a more complete Brian Buchanan. All bbers in that mold have great tapers---BB, Flex Jean-Guillame, Theirry Pastel, Melvin Anthony, and Jojo Ntiforo.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Jaime on November 28, 2010, 05:13:39 AM
Flex had one of the best tapers out there...he was effectively a more complete Brian Buchanan. All bbers in that mold have great tapers---BB, Flex Jean-Guillame, Theirry Pastel, Melvin Anthony, and Jojo Ntiforo.


Brian had a tiny waist and wideish shoulders. Flex had narrow shoulders and a smallish waist. Brian's taper kills Flex.

I don't think his taper was impressive at all, his structure kills it.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: hench on November 28, 2010, 10:14:24 AM
Arnolds frame and structure and well placed mass would have prevailed.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Parker on November 28, 2010, 10:51:45 AM

Brian had a tiny waist and wideish shoulders. Flex had narrow shoulders and a smallish waist. Brian's taper kills Flex.

I don't think his taper was impressive at all, his structure kills it.

They ALL had the same structure...tiny joints, with full muscle bellies...when they did each pose, they had virtually the same look...all the ones I listed also looked better at a lighter weight and held fat in the lower back-glute-ham tie in. All had the "Triangle" look when doing the front double biceps...and if you look at the Olympia vid and other old pics, Brian was not a wide guy, the illusion came from his ultra small waist...structurally, they were virtually the same...except Flex did more with it.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Azure on November 28, 2010, 03:44:32 PM
what a ghetto piece of shit, Arnold had class.

No wonder you guys are always talking about women troubles. 

That kind of arrogance gets 20 something chicks something hot.  Now him doing that act on a mature woman isn't going to work, but a cocky bastid like that would get lots of play from immature and horny young women.

Madeline was so fierce.  Her body was on point.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Reeves on November 28, 2010, 04:22:27 PM
No wonder you guys are always talking about women troubles. 

That kind of arrogance gets 20 something chicks something hot.  Now him doing that act on a mature woman isn't going to work, but a cocky bastid like that would get lots of play from immature and horny young women.

Madeline was so fierce.  Her body was on point.

I wouldn't want a woman that found such tripe "hot".  Young or otherwise.    Flux is at best a tepid pile of manure.  If it's a matter of who has had more women, its pretty much a guarantee that the Oak has been with more women than Flux.  The kind of physical presence Arnold had and has, coupled with being that which a great deal of shallow women find appealing, i.e., world famous and of course "financially hung" makes him all the more attractive to vapid women that would find Flux  merely "hot".  But then that's not much of a recommendation for taking a woman home to meet your parents.   "Mom?  Dad?  I'd like you to meet ______, She used to screw Arnold S., but she's changed now and wants to settle down."  Nah.  I don't think so.  No double standards here.   ;)

Flex?  In the grand scheme of things he's really a nobody.  Madeline?  Is she  the arm jewelry that Flux was wearing?  I've seen women as beautiful and better at the mall.  Now then,  to many here  I'm probably nothing to look at but neither am I a ridiculous little oil filled faux ghetto toad like that clown Flux was and probably still is.  I wouldn't touch a woman that had been with a person of such "character".    And for the record, color doesn't matter, character does.   

Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: tallgerman on November 28, 2010, 04:23:48 PM
arnold just looked was better and was tighter and taller
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Nirvana on November 28, 2010, 04:24:59 PM
Arnold didn't get attacked by ninjas and do 200lb t-bars for 10 reps
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Reeves on November 28, 2010, 04:27:21 PM
Arnold didn't get attacked by ninjas and do 200lb t-bars for 10 reps

True dat. ;)
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Parker on November 28, 2010, 04:35:30 PM
Flex Wheeler's waist smaller than Lee Labrada, here...and Lee was what, 5'5-5'6 and under 200 pounds? Flex was 216 for the 93 Arnold...what I want to know, is where is the full video?
(http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb224/Iceman1981photos/1993%20Arnold%20Classic/PDVD_028.jpg)
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Parker on November 28, 2010, 04:36:56 PM
Arnold didn't get attacked by ninjas and do 200lb t-bars for 10 reps
No, Uncle Joe just fixed contests in his favor...
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Jaime on November 28, 2010, 05:01:26 PM
They ALL had the same structure...tiny joints, with full muscle bellies...when they did each pose, they had virtually the same look...all the ones I listed also looked better at a lighter weight and held fat in the lower back-glute-ham tie in. All had the "Triangle" look when doing the front double biceps...and if you look at the Olympia vid and other old pics, Brian was not a wide guy, the illusion came from his ultra small waist...structurally, they were virtually the same...except Flex did more with it.


I really don't see where the fuck you are coming from here Parker. What is it that you are trying to argue? That Flex and Brian are genetically identical? If you look at any picture you would see that not only did Brian have wider shoulders, but that his waist was smaller than Flex's.
You are right in saying that Brian wasn't particularly wide and that it was his waist that gave him his taper, same so of Flex, only his taper was a lot worse.

Different physiques. Small joints, good shape although different, small hips along with waist (although Brian's was clearly smaller), both black, there are the similarities.

Flex had a bad taper and a shitty chest, this is pretty clear in any picture of him. Even in 1993 his abs were protruding and his chest was way overpowered by his delts and arms. This was his best form as he hadn't destroyed himself with oil at this point.

Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Firemuscle on November 28, 2010, 05:04:29 PM
 Arnold just had awesome biceps and a great personality.

 Besides that, he is pretty mediocre by pro BB standards.

 I never understood how people could say he's the greatest ever. It's like saying Babe Ruth was the greatest baseball player ever, just because he was a pioneer. But his skill has been surpassed at this point.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Jaime on November 28, 2010, 05:07:20 PM
Arnold just had awesome biceps and a great personality.

 Besides that, he is pretty mediocre by pro BB standards.

 I never understood how people could say he's the greatest ever. It's like saying Babe Ruth was the greatest baseball player ever, just because he was a pioneer. But his skill has been surpassed at this point.


Great chest, no real glaring weakpoints. There are a lot of guys that surpass him though or have a better structure.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Wiggs on November 28, 2010, 05:08:36 PM
Arnold just had awesome biceps and a great personality.

 Besides that, he is pretty mediocre by pro BB standards.

 I never understood how people could say he's the greatest ever. It's like saying Babe Ruth was the greatest baseball player ever, just because he was a pioneer. But his skill has been surpassed at this point.

If you can figure out a way to drill this into these idiots heads, you're a genius.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: tallgerman on November 28, 2010, 05:10:43 PM
Arnold just had awesome biceps and a great personality.

 Besides that, he is pretty mediocre by pro BB standards.

 I never understood how people could say he's the greatest ever. It's like saying Babe Ruth was the greatest baseball player ever, just because he was a pioneer. But his skill has been surpassed at this point.

lol

lol

lol

hilarious!!!!!!!

let me break it down:

arnold had chest n arms cant be beat, not overdone shoulders, and was rock hard without looking wak

no one can beat that

not flex not haney etc.

arnold -- nobody could beat him

flex was way inferior and shorter and softer :)






Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Firemuscle on November 28, 2010, 05:15:04 PM
 What about Arnold's thighs? Weak point? I think so.

 Also seems like his triceps were kinda weak, from the back he wan't too impressive in general, and his conditioning was often off.

 I see why you all think he's great. He was a great bodybuilder from sure. But the best??? I don't think so.

 I do like the 70's era though and I find it much more inspirational and cool than what's going on these days.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: tallgerman on November 28, 2010, 05:23:53 PM
not at all

remember ronnie coleman looks liek shit and woulda lost in the 80s as unsymmetircal bag of shit

size does not alone make a bodybuilder but symmetry

add height to that and awesome hardness and that is why arnold cant be beat

legs overdone look silly

you are a hater bro, sorry, and you are irrational
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Nirvana on November 28, 2010, 05:32:54 PM
arnold just got surpassed. it's like saying Dorian could beat Ronnie  :-X
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Firemuscle on November 28, 2010, 05:36:25 PM
not at all

remember ronnie coleman looks liek shit and woulda lost in the 80s as unsymmetircal bag of shit

size does not alone make a bodybuilder but symmetry

add height to that and awesome hardness and that is why arnold cant be beat

legs overdone look silly

you are a hater bro, sorry, and you are irrational

 Shut up gimmick.

 Arnold had some some great points for sure. But he didn't have the total package.

 I appreciate symettry and that's what I go for in my own training. And yes, Arnold did have great symettry. But other guys have been better.

 If you name any quality that Arnold had, I can name a few other guys who had it better.

 Since Arnold's day, guys with equally great genetics and on a lot more drugs have stepped in and surpassed what he did.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: tallgerman on November 28, 2010, 05:47:36 PM
Shut up gimmick.

 Arnold had some some great points for sure. But he didn't have the total package.

 I appreciate symettry and that's what I go for in my own training. And yes, Arnold did have great symettry. But other guys have been better.

 If you name any quality that Arnold had, I can name a few other guys who had it better.

 Since Arnold's day, guys with equally great genetics and on a lot more drugs have stepped in and surpassed what he did.


no you shut up gimmik

I named the qualities arnold had and no they have not been surpassed

not by flex and not by anyone

sorry

say what you want but no Arnold has not been surpassed.

I already spelled it you for you, size is not better just for size sake. 

you probably think ferrigno beat arnold

nope!

sorry
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: mass243 on November 28, 2010, 06:14:45 PM
  8)

(http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/4579/flexm.jpg)
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: tallgerman on November 28, 2010, 08:05:06 PM
 8)

(http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/4579/flexm.jpg)

too bad homy had to give it al back after mortgage crash and ebay the cars!

hoo haa!!!
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Reeves on November 28, 2010, 08:10:21 PM
What about Arnold's thighs? Weak point? I think so.

 Also seems like his triceps were kinda weak, from the back he wan't too impressive in general, and his conditioning was often off.

 I see why you all think he's great. He was a great bodybuilder from sure. But the best??? I don't think so.

 I do like the 70's era though and I find it much more inspirational and cool than what's going on these days.

Generally, your arms, neck and calves should be the same size and the measurement of both thighs should equal that of the chest.  Arnold's chest was 57" and thighs were 28.5" each, which totals 57".  His arms were 22.5" and his calves were 20.5".  I have no ideas as the measurement of his neck.  His waist was 34".

Your ass should not be so large as to remain in a room for 15 minutes after the rest of you has left.  This alone disqualifies Flux Wheedle, Kai Weenie, Dorian Wastes and Ronnie Coleslaw from being anything other than oil filled, GH fueled, bloated piles of shit. I trust this clears things up a bit?  If not, oh well.   ;D
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: disco_stu on November 28, 2010, 08:25:59 PM
Actually Arnold is on record stating Flex is the best bodybuilder he has EVER seen....He said it after on of Flex's Arnold Classic wins...I believe it was the 98 Arnold...This was pre-synthol Flex.

still wasnt pre-calf implants.

arnie was the better bodybuilder. everything on arnie was gained- not fake.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: tallgerman on November 28, 2010, 08:27:54 PM
Arnold also owns that show.

So to pump up whoever won is natural.

Films tells all.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: disco_stu on November 28, 2010, 08:40:17 PM

I really don't see where the fuck you are coming from here Parker. What is it that you are trying to argue? That Flex and Brian are genetically identical? If you look at any picture you would see that not only did Brian have wider shoulders, but that his waist was smaller than Flex's.
You are right in saying that Brian wasn't particularly wide and that it was his waist that gave him his taper, same so of Flex, only his taper was a lot worse.

Different physiques. Small joints, good shape although different, small hips along with waist (although Brian's was clearly smaller), both black, there are the similarities.

Flex had a bad taper and a shitty chest, this is pretty clear in any picture of him. Even in 1993 his abs were protruding and his chest was way overpowered by his delts and arms. This was his best form as he hadn't destroyed himself with oil at this point.



flex's back wasnt great either. delts and arms, superb. ripped, for sure. lats ripped- yes. mass and width in lats- hardly.

pecs?- ok but way less development then the overpowering arms and delts.

quads- ripped but lacking in thickness. calves?- absolutely none- some of the worst calves ive ever seen on a bodybuilder- then all of a sudden he had some undefined mass there...very strange.

all this nut hugging over flex is a joke. he got ripped and had great arms and delts. thats it for gods sake!

when you break it down that is it!

best BB EVER?- not even close. to be that youve got to have pecs, thick dense lats, kick ass quads and hams and solid, real calves.

ronnie had it all, haney had it all for the era..but arms and calves on the weak side, levrone had it all, arnold had it all for the era...no weaknesses- legs werent a focus then..not even yates meets the criteria..he misses on the arms and even the pecs werent great.

Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Captain Equipoise on November 28, 2010, 09:02:19 PM
My recollection was almost spot on asshole. I got the tape out and here is
what he said as measurements...
22 1/2 arms
legs -31 inch
waist -27 1/2
chest -right around 56 inches
Arnold says -the measurements your saying right now are world record measurements, right?
 


You fucking schmoe, I never questioned how spot on it was...hahaha, I was laughing at how big of a schmoe you are for remembering that much detail on something only a gay stalker would remember about another man, hahahaha

and for the record, only a complete fag would care about some guy's leg measurement from 18 years ago, oh brother  ::)  ::)

you sound like the kind of guy that could within 0.3 seconds of being asked, remember flex's thong color in any contest from 1992
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: tallgerman on November 28, 2010, 10:16:52 PM
arnold dominates shorty flex in every way
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Master Blaster on November 28, 2010, 10:26:45 PM
Flex is insane (was) but he doesn't (didn't) have that certain "hugeness" factor that makes people do a double take.   :o

(http://www.excellentbodybuilding.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/arnold-schwarzenegger-20060109-99364.jpg)

(http://www.muscle-builders.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Arnold-Schwarzenegger-bodybuilding-217x300.jpg)

(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/43/images/Arnold_Schwarzenegger_12.jpg)

(http://www.ifbbpro.com/wp-content/uploads/image/halloffame/ArnoldSchwarzenegger1.jpg)

(http://guy-kai-greene-2009-3-7-22-20.jpg)
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Parker on November 28, 2010, 11:15:31 PM

I really don't see where the fuck you are coming from here Parker. What is it that you are trying to argue? That Flex and Brian are genetically identical? If you look at any picture you would see that not only did Brian have wider shoulders, but that his waist was smaller than Flex's.
You are right in saying that Brian wasn't particularly wide and that it was his waist that gave him his taper, same so of Flex, only his taper was a lot worse.

Different physiques. Small joints, good shape although different, small hips along with waist (although Brian's was clearly smaller), both black, there are the similarities.

Flex had a bad taper and a shitty chest, this is pretty clear in any picture of him. Even in 1993 his abs were protruding and his chest was way overpowered by his delts and arms. This was his best form as he hadn't destroyed himself with oil at this point.


No, Flex, Brian, Jean Guillame, Melvin Anthony, Theirry Pastel and Jojo Ntiforo all have the virtually the same physique...the same "phenotype", bascially being traced back to around the Ghana area...they come from the same "assembly line" if you will with little variations...And since Jojo is straight from Africa...his  ethnic group's genetics could be the progenitor of Brian's, et al. here is Jojo:
(http://www.jojontiforo.com/10123_1106187061720_1438105327_30258161_3060416_n.jpg)
(http://www.jojontiforo.com/10123_1106187221724_1438105327_30258162_5384194_n.jpg)

(http://www.jojontiforo.com/bigjo3.jpg)

Now, notice the small joints, the tiny wasp waist, then and round muscles bellies. Same or similar flare to the lats, and when they hold the same pose---that one hand over to the head pose that Flex is pictured doing for the 1998 Arnold, they all have the same "lines", virtually small deviations.   Each of the named bbers has that, but also, that they look better around a smaller bodyweight, roughly 210-225 pounds, and they have the same flaws---harder to get dry.

Granted, Flex's arms did overpower his chest, and Brian's didn't, but Brian's upper body overpowered his lower. Basicallly its like this, you know a Corvette when you see a Corvette, or you know a Porsche 911 when you see a 911. They haven't really changed the formula, and you see the DNA within each model...the physiques of Brian, Jean-Paul Guillame, Theirry Pastel, Flex Wheeler, Melvin Anthony, and Jojo are like that 911, they all have the same formula...just slight variations
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: tallgerman on November 29, 2010, 12:15:06 AM
I haven't caused this much fuss since I told an englishman that england lost both world wars to germany and that usa won them.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Parker on November 29, 2010, 12:32:14 AM
I haven't caused this much fuss since I told an englishman that england lost both world wars to germany and that usa won them.
Well, I also meant to answer you---Arnold had a w-i-d-e waist, even he admitted this, and to his sloping shoulders as well. If he were to be a bodybuilder in this timeframe, he would look similar to Gunter---and we know what happened to Gunter in 2003-04...The fact is Arnold is the most popular bodybuilder, but even in his day he was not th most genetically gifted---that goes to Sergio, and Serge, and even Robby Robinson...of note, almost all the bodybuilders of that day had huge chests...
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: mass243 on November 29, 2010, 01:18:39 AM
Well, I also meant to answer you---Arnold had a w-i-d-e waist, even he admitted this, and to his sloping shoulders as well. If he were to be a bodybuilder in this timeframe, he would look similar to Gunter---and we know what happened to Gunter in 2003-04...The fact is Arnold is the most popular bodybuilder, but even in his day he was not th most genetically gifted---that goes to Sergio, and Serge, and even Robby Robinson...of note, almost all the bodybuilders of that day had huge chests...

Why is that?
Did they use chains like Branch?
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Parker on November 29, 2010, 01:26:16 AM
Why is that?
Did they use chains like Branch?
;D, probably the higher reps, or less emphasis on arms, or smaller arms, delts, and back, that outshine the chest...just look at this pic of Jim Morris, Bill Pearl and friends...
(http://www.gymmorris.com/photos/stars%20and%20stripes%202.jpg)
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: mass243 on November 29, 2010, 01:32:23 AM
;D, probably the higher reps, or less emphasis on arms, or smaller arms, delts, and back, that outshine the chest...just look at this pic of Jim Morris, Bill Pearl and friends...


Yes, I agree with you totally on this. It must be smaller arms and delts that made their pecs stand out more in the past..
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Parker on November 29, 2010, 01:36:20 AM
Yes, I agree with you totally on this. It must be smaller arms and delts that made their pecs stand out more in the past..
It sounds like you were being sarcastic...but, I think that there is less emphasis on training chest right...I was watching Phil Heath's first vid, and the angle he had on the incline bench---I thought he was working delts more than the chest because it was so high. 
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: mass243 on November 29, 2010, 01:44:03 AM
It sounds like you were being sarcastic...but, I think that there is less emphasis on training chest right...I was watching Phil Heath's first vid, and the angle he had on the incline bench---I thought he was working delts more than the chest because it was so high. 

Not meant to be sarcasm in my post here. Sorry if you got that impression. (that's downside of GB, never know whether someone agrees with you or is just foolin around  :)  )

I remember someone saying that incline bench is more for delts than chest... Not sure about that but I bet those old schoolers did much more heavy plain bench pressing than guys these days do.


Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Parker on November 29, 2010, 01:47:44 AM
Not meant to be sarcasm in my post here. Sorry if you got that impression. (that's downside of GB, never know whether someone agrees with you or is just foolin around  :)  )

I remember someone saying that incline bench is more for delts than chest... Not sure about that but I bet those old schoolers did much more heavy plain bench pressing than guys these days do.



I think Arnold credited inclines for his fullness...Flex magazine had a list of the top chests and those with exceptional fullness usually had emphasis on inclines, like Sergio, Arnold, Bertil Fox...from what i remember 
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: mass243 on November 29, 2010, 01:54:17 AM
Not comparing myself to pros (lol) but I've always got best gains in chest by doing much of flying movements. Cable crossovers, dumbbell fly..
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Parker on November 29, 2010, 02:15:32 AM
Not comparing myself to pros (lol) but I've always got best gains in chest by doing much of flying movements. Cable crossovers, dumbbell fly..
have you tried supersetting pec deck with dips...the pump is off the meter?
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: mass243 on November 29, 2010, 02:19:13 AM
have you tried supersetting pec deck with dips...the pump is off the meter?

Actually never. Might give it a try... at least dips I've always liked.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on November 29, 2010, 06:10:31 AM
Arnold beat Sergio. Enough said.

Flex is insane (was) but he doesn't (didn't) have that certain "hugeness" factor that makes people do a double take.   :o

Arnold 1974 off season is the biggest and thickest I have ever seen anyone. And he still had the split in the pecs. Beat that Flex.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: JP_RC on November 29, 2010, 06:19:47 AM

1993 Flex has a shitty chest, is extremely narrow and has zero taper.

Arnold doesn't look like a mutant so wins by default.

 :o   :P    ::)
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: JP_RC on November 29, 2010, 06:27:15 AM
Why is a bb from the 70s being compared to a bb from the 90s? Its not a fair comparison in my opinion, Arnold vs Lee Haney would be a better comparison or Flex vs Heath maybe.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: The Showstoppa on November 29, 2010, 06:31:15 AM
Why is a bb from the 70s being compared to a bb from the 90s? Its not a fair comparison in my opinion, Arnold vs Lee Haney would be a better comparison or Flex vs Heath maybe.

True, Arnold went on to become a multi-millionaire, movie star and governor.....Flex got some shitty tats....
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Dorian01 on November 29, 2010, 10:49:22 AM
When I first started visiting here it was full of those Ironage guys who considered Arnold to be crap, just a collection of beach muscles. They'd often mention his delts, saying they were rolled or sloped or something.

He looks great to me in the pics posted. About as complete as anyone back then.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Firemuscle on November 29, 2010, 04:36:01 PM
 It's official.

 Flex beats Arnold.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 29, 2010, 05:18:08 PM
It's official.

 Flex beats Arnold.

if they competed onstage at their best yes Flex would beat Arnold
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Firemuscle on November 29, 2010, 05:21:09 PM
if they competed onstage at their best yes Flex would beat Arnold

 You're totally right.

 Of course Flex destroyed his body to achieve what he did. So obvious what he did was really unsustainable.

 Also Ronnie Coleman would totally destroy Dorian Yates, don't you think?
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Reeves on November 29, 2010, 06:19:01 PM
You're totally right.

 Of course Flex destroyed his body to achieve what he did. So obvious what he did was really unsustainable.

 Also Ronnie Coleman would totally destroy Dorian Yates, don't you think?

Drugs will ultimately destroy all of those clowns.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Firemuscle on November 29, 2010, 06:22:25 PM
Drugs will ultimately destroy all of those clowns.

 Some guys use drugs and escape without much harm.

 Of course when they come off they're lucky to keep even 10 pounds of muscle, and end up looking worse than if they stayed natty usually. Seems like they fuck up their natural hormone levels often.

 A slave to the drugs and food, to maintain their size and definition.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: tallgerman on November 29, 2010, 08:24:05 PM
naaaaa

flex was never even close to arnold

arnold destroys flex  - same way I mentined many times, flex shorter, delts too big, and chest weak

flex a coward not to try acting tho

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_IHTxHOWRA6U/TPTFctrITFI/AAAAAAAAAf8/NNQgLy31cPI/s320/woa.jpg)

Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: caseyviator on November 30, 2010, 11:06:43 AM
 8)

(http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/4579/flexm.jpg)
hahahaha  ken wheeler and his chrome rims    typical shit
i think
1-ron
2-yates
3-jay
4-arnold
5-phil
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Jaime on November 30, 2010, 11:07:47 AM
hahahaha  ken wheeler and his chrome rims    typical shit
i think
1-ron
2-yates
3-jay
4-arnold
5-phil


Congratz on the shittest list i have ever seen.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Master Blaster on November 30, 2010, 11:17:47 AM
Someone tell this idiot he left his headlights on   ::)

(http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/4579/flexm.jpg)
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Wiggs on November 30, 2010, 11:19:12 AM
Someone tell this idiot he left his headlights on   ::)

(http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/4579/flexm.jpg)

lol
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: JP_RC on November 30, 2010, 12:05:53 PM
hahahaha  ken wheeler and his chrome rims    typical shit
i think
1-ron
2-yates
3-jay
4-arnold
5-phil

lol at jay.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Parker on November 30, 2010, 12:19:31 PM
Arnold beat Sergio. Enough said.

Arnold 1974 off season is the biggest and thickest I have ever seen anyone. And he still had the split in the pecs. Beat that Flex.
Flex can do a split and actually has legs...
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on November 30, 2010, 01:08:31 PM
Flex can do a split and actually has legs...

Yeah, those calves which are one of the suckiest in the whole history of bodybuilding. Arnold had some serious legs in 1974. He had huge delts for god's sake! It's a black and white backstage photo with lots of shadows, but I think no-one can deny his size in that rare pic that I'm hoping someone could post again.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 30, 2010, 01:15:05 PM
Yeah, those calves which are one of the suckiest in the whole history of bodybuilding. Arnold had some serious legs in 1974. He had huge delts for god's sake! It's a black and white backstage photo with lots of shadows, but I think no-one can deny his size in that rare pic that I'm hoping someone could post again.

This pic?  ???
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Parker on November 30, 2010, 01:17:53 PM
Yeah, those calves which are one of the suckiest in the whole history of bodybuilding. Arnold had some serious legs in 1974. He had huge delts for god's sake! It's a black and white backstage photo with lots of shadows, but I think no-one can deny his size in that rare pic that I'm hoping someone could post again.
Melvin Anthony, JOJ, Wolf, now those are bad calves, Flex's 1992-3 calves were good for his size.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on November 30, 2010, 01:30:57 PM
This pic?  ???

Nope. I searched hundreds of pages for this pic, no schmoe.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=311265.0;attach=351449;image)
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: tallgerman on November 30, 2010, 07:04:59 PM
flex was never even in the same universe

flex short delts too big and weak chest

nuff said

outrageous arrogance to say blah about people saying here is best body etc et cand no one surpass it when flex himself did not

lol

typical arrogant doofus

(http://pma.iqthumbs.com/st/thumbs/003/1339758055.jpg)
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: tallgerman on December 04, 2010, 10:41:14 PM
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_IHTxHOWRA6U/TPszuvK8TcI/AAAAAAAAAhE/xIpjrQVhrtE/s320/nices2.JPG)
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on December 04, 2010, 11:02:39 PM
some of the people in this thread arguing that arnold was superior to flex need to either

A) remove head from ass

B)  stop letting racial prejudice cloud your objectivity

(im one of the biggest racists on here, and even i can ride above it and acknowledge ken wheeler had the greatest bodybuilding of anyone ever born to planet earth)


he dominates arnold in EVERY way..........thought it really isnt a fir comparison, causse the conditionign criteria and drugs and bodies changed So much from arnold s day to flex's day.

i woudl be interested to see what a peak arnold could have looked like on an early 90s contest drug protocol and diet..........eh would have been hard to beat
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Parker on December 04, 2010, 11:24:57 PM
some of the people in this thread arguing that arnold was superior to flex need to either

A) remove head from ass

B)  stop letting racial prejudice cloud your objectivity

(im one of the biggest racists on here, and even i can ride above it and acknowledge ken wheeler had the greatest bodybuilding of anyone ever born to planet earth)


he dominates arnold in EVERY way..........thought it really isnt a fir comparison, causse the conditionign criteria and drugs and bodies changed So much from arnold s day to flex's day.

i woudl be interested to see what a peak arnold could have looked like on an early 90s contest drug protocol and diet..........eh would have been hard to beat
Look no further than Gunter...same wide waist, looked very similar at a lighter weight
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on December 04, 2010, 11:54:32 PM
Look no further than Gunter...same wide waist, looked very similar at a lighter weight


no your reaching

first, arnold doestn have a wide waist

second, he would not look like gunter.......just cause they are two germanic bodybuidlers doesnt mean they would look the same

we actually dont know what he would look like with the growth, higher dosages of AAS and more extreme condition............but it would be VERY dominate.......arnold had very few weak point..............his weakest part, his back..........was even pretty good
(http://www.withfriendship.com/user/images/331/Arnold-posing.jpg)



(http://farm1.static.flickr.com/102/283960507_202dcbe95d_o.jpg)



and lookin like gunter isnt necessarily a bad thing anway..........there was a A show, where gunter made a prime ronnie coleman look like a child..........if he was more consistant with that look...........and he wasnt from europe.............gunte r might have one or two sandows

arnold would probably look more like dennis wolf then gunter.........



(http://muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=41781&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)
(http://www.bodybuildingpro.com/mrolympia2001p/mro2001p_schlierkamp01.jpg)\

he DOMINATED ronnie at the 2002 SOS

(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/2002/soscomp64.jpg)

Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Parker on December 05, 2010, 12:09:29 AM

no your reaching

first, arnold doestn have a wide waist

second, he would not look like gunter.......just cause they are two germanic bodybuidlers doesnt mean they would look the same

we actually dont know what he would look like with the growth, higher dosages of AAS and more extreme condition............but it would be VERY dominate.......arnold had very few weak point..............his weakest part, his back..........was even pretty good
(http://www.withfriendship.com/user/images/331/Arnold-posing.jpg)



(http://farm1.static.flickr.com/102/283960507_202dcbe95d_o.jpg)



and lookin like gunter isnt necessarily a bad thing anway..........there was a A show, where gunter made a prime ronnie coleman look like a child..........if he was more consistant with that look...........and he wasnt from europe.............gunte r might have one or two sandows

arnold would probably look more like dennis wolf then gunter.........



(http://muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=41781&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)
(http://www.ilovespam.com/mrolympia2001p/mro2001p_schlierkamp01.jpg)\

he DOMINATED ronnie at the 2002 SOS

(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/2002/soscomp64.jpg)


Arnold said himself in the Encyclopedia of Bodybuilding that he had a wide waist, which is way he did those twisting shots (also said that he like Dillett, had sloping shoulders)  to take emphasis off of those...there is a color pic of Arnold with that blonde that he and Franco used to tag (she's in a yellow bikini) and he has one of those workout gizmos, well it highlighted Arnold's wide waist...

It has nothing to do with the fact they are too German bbers, per se, but the fact that they have the same look. Also, there is a ad of Gunter, dressed up as a Conan type figure, it was for a video game, and he had the same waist line as Arnold when he portrayed Conan...thick, wide

Gunter was good, until he turned around that is where he lost to Ronnie, but it was odd, how that loss actually fueled Ronnie to look like aliens bred him for meat consumption
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on December 05, 2010, 12:23:49 AM
this isnt a good shot for anyones waist


he waist might have been big compared to serge nubret...........but it wasnt particularly big.........or maybe his ribcage and chest were so big, tht it made his wide waist look smaller


he had one of the wides ribcages of all time



look how small here

(http://theselvedgeyard.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/522145431_e0d9b7532a_o.jpg?w=600&h=525)


Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Immortal_Technique on December 05, 2010, 01:57:54 AM
Flex at the 98 Ironman, 2 weeks before the Arnold Classic...incredible condition...he was even better at the Arnold but the pics don't show it...When I get the video I'll post only that portion of the show.




His quads and latspread are small, and his impressive delts and arms are made of oil ??? Good midsection though.
Title: Re: Flex Wheeler never was as good as arnold.
Post by: Immortal_Technique on December 05, 2010, 02:05:38 AM
Arnold and Gunther aren't really similar. Arnold's upper legs were his weekest point, and Gunther had huge quads. They both have undersized delts, but aesthetically they are seriously different looking.

I do however look at Arnold, Markus and Gunther and wonder if biceps are a germanic gift, and triceps are not. Or maybe it's just because tall people have more trouble filling out the triceps.