Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Tre on December 06, 2010, 10:54:21 AM
-
Just wondering.
-
4g don't exist homey
http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/01/technology/4g_myth/index.htm?source=cnn_bin&hpt=Sbin
-
No, but the old iPhones suck already if that helps. Same with the iPhone 4s.
-
4g don't exist homey
http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/01/technology/4g_myth/index.htm?source=cnn_bin&hpt=Sbin
My bad - I meant 4s.
-
all companies do it
but apple is truely fucking shameful and dispicable with their "preplanned obselesence"
purposely releassing models without features they could easily put in them, just so 4 months later they can re-release the item with these "nerw features" making the expensive one you just bought next to worthless
and i believe they purposely make their shit have a short lifespan as well...........back when ipods were in their heyday.........if you remember the ones from the first couple of years cose hundreds and lasted only months if you used them regulalry
apple is a necessary evil to some extent............like i tunes.......i have that on my comp.............but i try to use Apple products as little as possible
i FUCKING HATE them.............i hate their disgusting business practices of ripping people off..........i hate how they try to dictate morality and say what people can ans cant listen and see and put on their platforms............... .and even worse, i hate how they are branded as the company for "individuals", progrerssive people who follow their own path........when they are one of the biggest evil conglomerates in the world.......fooling dumb young rich kids with their "individualist" image
i hope cancer eats steve jobs sloooooooooowly.....gree dy fuck
-
for once we agree...in principle.
i refuse to use apple anything.
but its not true that they deliberately put hardware age limits into products...no one does that.
i work in that field for a living- the proof is a loooong story so dont request an explanation ok.
-
for once we agree...in principle.
i refuse to use apple anything.
but its not true that they deliberately put hardware age limits into products...no one does that.
i work in that field for a living- the proof is a loooong story so dont request an explanation ok.
it doesnt have to be an active thing where they put things in to limit product age..........it can be more passivly achieved by using materials or methods that dont last particularly long
this is a balance evey company has to find, balancing quality with cost and pragmatism........nothin g we typically buy is made from the best materials and methods possible
but it just seems (at least with the ipods i used to buy in college) thats it went beyond...........and they failed very quickly
-
for once we agree...in principle.
i refuse to use apple anything.
but its not true that they deliberately put hardware age limits into products...no one does that.
i work in that field for a living- the proof is a loooong story so dont request an explanation ok.
Explanation please? I've always wondered what is to stop them from designing a product that automatically fails after am certain timeframe, say, when the new product is launched?
-
it doesnt have to be an active thing where they put things in to limit product age..........it can be more passivly achieved by using materials or methods that dont last particularly long
this is a balance evey company has to find, balancing quality with cost and pragmatism........nothin g we typically buy is made from the best materials and methods possible
but it just seems (at least with the ipods i used to buy in college) thats it went beyond...........and they failed very quickly
i think apple is putting some kind of fumes into their products, because their users go almost rabid mad whenever you say something about apple other than how hard you want to blow jobs.
apple hasn't invented shit in 20 years (minus the concept of the home computer, but even that's debatable). mp3 players existed before the ipod (i know, i had an RCA before apple had the ipod), tablets existed before ipads, etc etc.
they just repackage it in white, slap an apple sticker on it, sprinkle it with fairy dust, mark it up 300% and can't keep up with demand. props to them, yay capitalism, but it reeks of bullshit often. apple fanatics remind me of atheists getting in a "civilized argument" with a christian.
-
i think apple is putting some kind of fumes into their products, because their users go almost rabid mad whenever you say something about apple other than how hard you want to blow jobs.
apple hasn't invented shit in 20 years (minus the concept of the home computer, but even that's debatable). mp3 players existed before the ipod (i know, i had an RCA before apple had the ipod), tablets existed before ipads, etc etc.
they just repackage it in white, slap an apple sticker on it, sprinkle it with fairy dust, mark it up 300% and can't keep up with demand. props to them, yay capitalism, but it reeks of bullshit often. apple fanatics remind me of atheists getting in a "civilized argument" with a christian.
\
yuk, apple fans are the fucking WORST........because like it said in my above post
they have this false sense that apple is for the individual, and cares about the individual.........they think that apple is some forward thinking company that represents creativity and non conformity..........and that couldnt be further from the truth
they act like microsoft is the evil conglometate that in uncreative and wants money and assimilation..........wh en APPLE IS NO DIFFERENT
but you cant tell the whiny little apple f@gs that............they think steve jobs cares about them ::) ::) ::) ::)
-
it doesnt have to be an active thing where they put things in to limit product age..........it can be more passivly achieved by using materials or methods that dont last particularly long
this is a balance evey company has to find, balancing quality with cost and pragmatism........nothin g we typically buy is made from the best materials and methods possible
but it just seems (at least with the ipods i used to buy in college) thats it went beyond...........and they failed very quickly
I have a iPod classic, got it last yr, months after the warranty expired, it basically "got sick", I had 15k songs on it, now only 1.9k songs, (A-C), and it only plays a few of the C songs...
I have a older iPhone that I am typing this on now, it acts up, shutting down, or the screen goes blank before or after a call so that you can't put the call on "speakerphone", then after the call, you can't really end the call, because you can't pull the screen up...this happens sporadically...
-
I'll be the first to admit that my 3gs has served me well and has been well worth the price of the phone itself (but not the plan, of course).
When it had its little 'upgrade' issue to the new OS, I was pissed for about a day, but when all my notes were recovered, I forgave them...but haven't forgotten what a stressful day that was.
I remember being sad that an arsonist set the mall on fire...but at the same time being happy that the Apple store might've burned down.
But these days, the phone has an occasional hiccup and slowdowns when using some of the apps and when texting. No problems with calls, Shazam, or Pandora, but it is definitely showing signs that it does not intend to last me forever...or even another year, at this rate.
-
it's called planned obsolescence.
it's made to fail just in time to upgrade. yes it's real they actually design it to break.
-
it doesnt have to be an active thing where they put things in to limit product age..........it can be more passivly achieved by using materials or methods that dont last particularly long
this is a balance evey company has to find, balancing quality with cost and pragmatism........nothin g we typically buy is made from the best materials and methods possible
but it just seems (at least with the ipods i used to buy in college) thats it went beyond...........and they failed very quickly
i agree- Im SR RF designer, work in LTE POWER AMPS for SKYWORKS INC, and I agree with you
-
it's called planned obsolescence.
it's made to fail just in time to upgrade. yes it's real they actually design it to break.
i said that already
-
all companies do it
but apple is truely fucking shameful and dispicable with their "preplanned obselesence"
purposely releassing models without features they could easily put in them, just so 4 months later they can re-release the item with these "nerw features" making the expensive one you just bought next to worthless
and i believe they purposely make their shit have a short lifespan as well...........back when ipods were in their heyday.........if you remember the ones from the first couple of years cose hundreds and lasted only months if you used them regulalry
apple is a necessary evil to some extent............like i tunes.......i have that on my comp.............but i try to use Apple products as little as possible
i FUCKING HATE them.............i hate their disgusting business practices of ripping people off..........i hate how they try to dictate morality and say what people can ans cant listen and see and put on their platforms............... .and even worse, i hate how they are branded as the company for "individuals", progrerssive people who follow their own path........when they are one of the biggest evil conglomerates in the world.......fooling dumb young rich kids with their "individualist" image
i hope cancer eats steve jobs sloooooooooowly.....gree dy fuck
lol dude you have a lot of anger.
-
it's called planned obsolescence.
it's made to fail just in time to upgrade. yes it's real they actually design it to break.
basically kinda like chewing/bubble gum...Or the Domestic Car companies at one time. With chewing/bubble gum, the flavor wouldn't last that long, meaning that you had to go thru a whole pack quickly, thus making you buy more. Thenm they come out with 'longer lasting" gum, which did last marginally longer, but you still were buying more packs...gum like Juicy Fruit, still have a short lifespan.
With the Domestic car companies, it seemed like they engineered the cars to last a certain number, and then they break...It also seems that BMW continues this practice wit the cars lasting just little after their warranty expires...
-
all companies do it
but apple is truely fucking shameful and dispicable with their "preplanned obselesence"
purposely releassing models without features they could easily put in them, just so 4 months later they can re-release the item with these "nerw features" making the expensive one you just bought next to worthless
and i believe they purposely make their shit have a short lifespan as well...........back when ipods were in their heyday.........if you remember the ones from the first couple of years cose hundreds and lasted only months if you used them regulalry
apple is a necessary evil to some extent............like i tunes.......i have that on my comp.............but i try to use Apple products as little as possible
i FUCKING HATE them.............i hate their disgusting business practices of ripping people off..........i hate how they try to dictate morality and say what people can ans cant listen and see and put on their platforms............... .and even worse, i hate how they are branded as the company for "individuals", progrerssive people who follow their own path........when they are one of the biggest evil conglomerates in the world.......fooling dumb young rich kids with their "individualist" image
i hope cancer eats steve jobs sloooooooooowly.....gree dy fuck
Sounds like someones bitter they cant afford an iphone? all phones die after a while brah.... Go grab a verizon phone and jerk off to windows vista
-
i said that already
over 3 sentences = I don't read it.
jk I wasn't paying attention
-
over 3 sentences = I don't read it.
jk I wasn't paying attention
It's all good - things have to be repeated at least 3 times before we black folk will begin to understand.
I mean, seriously, have you ever noticed how the only 2 things we comprehend without fail are the 1st and the 15th?? ;D
-
i dont like wireless.....
the technology is shady....
EASY to hack.....
.....
.....and i'm an ethical hacker....
-
Of course the two guys saying there's no planned obsolescence work in the industry ::)
-
for once we agree...in principle.
i refuse to use apple anything.
but its not true that they deliberately put hardware age limits into products...no one does that.
i work in that field for a living- the proof is a loooong story so dont request an explanation ok.
well, I have had the same ipod hardcore use for 4 years. did I just get the lucky one you guys forgot to bug?
btw has anybody else notice that skullcandy ear buds are the absolute worst fucking headphones?
-
Sounds like someones bitter they cant afford an iphone? all phones die after a while brah.... Go grab a verizon phone and jerk off to windows vista
wow, did you ever nail it..........im just bitter cause i cant afford an iphone :-[ :-[
your powers of perception are REALLY.............fucki n' terrible
it not that i cant afford an iphone..........i cant even afford a cell phone.........i still use a a pager :-[ :-[
-
My 3g-s works just fine.
-
wow, did you ever nail it..........im just bitter cause i cant afford an iphone :-[ :-[
your powers of perception are REALLY.............fucki n' terrible
it not that i cant afford an iphone..........i cant even afford a cell phone.........i still use a a pager :-[ :-[
sorry about your luck? :-\
-
My 3g-s works just fine.
For now....
-
sorry about your luck? :-\
thank you....your empathy is duly noted
-
Just wondering.
A lawsuit filed this week claims that Apple deliberately pushed iOS 4.0 to iPhone 3G and 3GS users, despite the fact that they knew it was buggy and slow, in order to improve sales of the iPhone 4. In a civil case brought at the County Court of San Diego in California, Bianca Wofford complains the upgrade made her phone virtually useless, and that Apple used the fact that users can't downgrade to an older version of the operating system to induce them to buy iPhone 4s. The case may bring closer scrutiny to Apple's restrictions on the ability of users to load the software they want on devices they own.
The crux of Wofford's complaint is that Apple urged users of older phones to upgrade, promising performance improvements that they knew iOS 4 could not deliver. According to the lawsuit [PDF], "Apple has falsely, intentionally and repeatedly represented that iOS 4, was a significant upgrade for the functionality of all iPhone devices, when in fact... iOS 4 is a substantial 'downgrade' for earlier iPhone devices and renders many of them virtually useless 'iBricks.'" The fundamental problem that Wofford and her lawyers highlight here is the fact that users can't downgrade without jailbreaking and voiding their warranties. "The iOS4 'upgrade' has essentially curtailed usefulness of the 3G/3GS devices," the lawsuit continues, "and left consumers, like Wofford, without any ability to restore the device to its prior acceptable functionality.
If the case is found in the plaintiff's favor, Apple will be facing false advertising charges and violation of California's Unfair Competition Act, and may end up having to pay restitution and damages. In addition, the court may order that Apple provide a way for users to downgrade, or protect jailbreakers' warranty writes. The filing also states that Wofford intends to ask a judge to grant class action status to her lawsuit in order to provide benefits for more iPhone 3G and 3GS users that suffered from the problem.
Here's a conspiracy theory.
Why 4.0 ran like a bag of crap, and 4.1 runs almost as well as 3.1.x did?
Could Crapple mysteriously include a bug that only affected iPhone 3G/3Gs handsets? hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
That could be a way to force "and bust sales" people to get the new IOs 4