Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: littleguns on December 15, 2010, 10:46:24 AM
-
Aside from record, who's had the better body!
-
Dillett was a freak, but Nasser by a mile and in fact.
-
What kiwi said.
-
Dillett was aesthetically better actually...and he actually had a smaller waist, bigger calves, thighs, arms, chest, delts, traps, and better abs with serratus and intercostals...both had shitty backs...
Dillett was better put together, better taper, Nasser was just big...
-
Nassers muscles were more "mature" and more complete than Dillet... Dillet was a freak though.
-
Dillett had better shape, both had abysmal back development, but overall with all things considered I would say Nasser.
-
If I have to tell the truth...Nasshole..
-
lol....
dillet is so underrated .....
his back was not weak..... he just could'nt flex and spread his lats equally .......
his lats were very well developed .....lacking detail not size or development or width ....
ive said this before....... if paul could pose as well as darrem charles or flex wheeler or levrone he would have had a totally different career..... and would have won a shitload
nasser was a top bb .....but dillet blows him away imo
-
Aside from record, who's had the better body!
Nasser
-
Yeah, its weird..If we start going them through muscle by muscle from head to toe, dillet takes it. But still, nassers muscles look that they actually belong to him, dillet just looks...synthetic, i would say, like a kid with a superhero suit. And most importantly, nassoil doesnt suck as badly as a poser as dillet does...So overall, i give it to nasser
-
Nasser by far, his '96-'97 shape was probably the best in the world
-
lol....
dillet is so underrated .....
his back was not weak..... he just could'nt flex and spread his lats equally .......
his lats were very well developed .....lacking detail not size or development or width ....
ive said this before....... if paul could pose as well as darrem charles or flex wheeler or levrone he would have had a totally different career..... and would have won a shitload
nasser was a top bb .....but dillet blows him away imo
His back sucked horribly it was wide and that's it. It lacked depth , detail and thickness , it lacked great separation as well , it was no where near what a 285lb bodybuilder should have for a back.
look at this picture it says it all , his back looks NO wider , thicker or better than a man who he out-weighs by eighty-fucking-pounds
-
His back sucked horribly it was wide and that's it. It lacked depth , detail and thickness , it lacked great separation as well , it was no where near what a 285lb bodybuilder should have for a back.
look at this picture it says it all , his back looks NO wider , thicker or better than a man who he out-weighs by eighty-fucking-pounds
Yep, and those sickbig delts with zero separation actually make this pose look even worse, poor brotha... :'(
-
His back sucked horribly it was wide and that's it. It lacked depth , detail and thickness , it lacked great separation as well , it was no where near what a 285lb bodybuilder should have for a back.
look at this picture it says it all , his back looks NO wider , thicker or better than a man who he out-weighs by eighty-fucking-pounds
you were checkin the glutes and having lil dreams
-
you were checkin the glutes and having lil dreams
You got me there :-X
-
Yep, and those sickbig delts with zero separation actually make this pose look even worse, poor brotha... :'(
yeah his delts sucked too :-\ huge round NO separation of detail it's like he was injecting with oil they have that glossy look like Flex did latter in his career
-
nasser was more symmetrical and could pose and had a less shitty back than even dillet.
-
Dillett was a freak, but Nasser by a mile and in fact.
x2
-
(http://w126.wrzuta.pl/sr/f/7u2ijByl2is/paul_dillet)
lol this pic is unreal. i'm not going to make any comment on their physiques but I feel many would nominate nasser simply for his personality and looks.
in fact, i believe much of bodybuilding history comes down to personality and good looks, and the need to build heroes of mythical proportions instead of, necessarily, pure analysis of the muscles.
-
His back sucked horribly it was wide and that's it. It lacked depth , detail and thickness , it lacked great separation as well , it was no where near what a 285lb bodybuilder should have for a back.
look at this picture it says it all , his back looks NO wider , thicker or better than a man who he out-weighs by eighty-fucking-pounds
Do you have the picture that shows Dillet crouching next to Ray, where Dillet's shoulders are bigger than Shawn's head? And follow that up with the above picture where you can see how horrible Paul's back is because he can't pose worth shit!
-
lol this pic is unreal. i'm not going to make any comment on their physiques but I feel many would nominate nasser simply for his personality and looks.
You mean his movie star good looks, and his irascible charm in being an ungrateful 6-week house guest?
-
A tie neither had a back, both huge from frontal view.
-
Dillet, bigger freak.
Nasser, better bodybuilder.
-
You mean his movie star good looks, and his irascible charm in being an ungrateful 6-week house guest?
Haha compared to dillet, nasser is more than a movie star.
And as far as personality and overall likability, well... is there a team dillet hanging out somewhere?
-
Aside from record, who's had the better body!
Nasser by atleast 3x uncrowned mr olympias
-
Do you have the picture that shows Dillet crouching next to Ray, where Dillet's shoulders are bigger than Shawn's head? And follow that up with the above picture where you can see how horrible Paul's back is because he can't pose worth shit!
;)
-
Dillett's back :-\ worse than Nasser
-
Dillett's back :-\ worse than Nasser
Flex looks better than Ronnie in that shot.
-
nasser in all poses!!.. not even close :-X
-
:-X :-X
-
:-X :-X :-X
-
nasser in all poses!!.. not even close :-X
Wont argue much, but the last pic you posted was an epic self ownage.
The rest, yes, youre right, but not that last one.
Dont worry, Ill wait patiently for you to nitpick tiny details to somehow justify why Nasser is better in your opinion in everything, including how he fucks and what toliet paper he uses. :-\
EDIT
This pic Sherief, is your epic self ownage at its finest.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=359502.0;attach=394705;image)
-
Flex's back and arm detail was simply incredible
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=359502.0;attach=394700;image)
-
Wont argue much, but the last pic you posted was an epic self ownage.
The rest, yes, youre right, but not that last one.
Dont worry, Ill wait patiently for you to nitpick tiny details to somehow justify why Nasser is better in your opinion in everything, including how he fucks and what toliet paper he uses. :-\
EDIT
This pic Sherief, is your epic self ownage at its finest.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=359502.0;attach=394705;image)
do you really see dillett better in the abs/thigh pose?!.. in all fairness i give it to nasser because of his wider lats and better abs (shape wise)!!..
-
Dillett looks better in the abs n thigh and the RLS poses, at least in the pics Sherief has posted.
-
hey shitwave you said the last pics!!.. ok even the fdb i see nasser better again because of his wider lats and better abs (shape) and better quads.. also look how his chest is thicker than dillett's in this pose!!..
dillett was for sure great in this pose too but i believe most ppl see nasser better!!..
-
do you really see dillett better in the abs/thigh pose?!.. in all fairness i give it to nasser because of his wider lats and better abs (shape wise)!!..
The pic I quoted im seeing as a FDB... what the fuck is it showing up to you as?
In the FDB pic I attached, Dillet is straight up owning Nasser. In that one pic.
Overall I give it to Nasser as the better BB, hes the more complete of 2 incomplete BB's.
-
hey shitwave you said the last pics!!.. ok even the fdb i see nasser better again because of his wider lats and better abs (shape) and better quads.. also look how his chest is thicker than dillett's in this pose!!..
dillett was for sure great in this pose too but i believe most ppl see nasser better!!..
Nassers condition is inferior to Dillets in that pic, check the visible sartorius muscle, and Nassers thicker pecs do not make up for lack of condition, not to mention dillet has better proportion and flow in that one pic.
Like I said, I knew youd nitpick a way for you to see Nasser as better, and you did, despite obviously being behind in condition, not to mention aesthetics, Dillets waist is smaller and his proportions are better.
FYI, I feel the answer to this question is still Nasser is the better BB, but Dillet was the freak of all freaks.
-
Dillett looks better in the abs n thigh and the RLS poses, at least in the pics Sherief has posted.
yes i agree that in this particular pic. (RLS) dillett's back looks better (more detailed) although nasser's is wider.. i was going to post another one from mr. olympia 97 where nasser looked better in this pose but they were not beside each other as dorian was in between them ;D
here it's anyway!!..
-
do you really see dillett better in the abs/thigh pose?!.. in all fairness i give it to nasser because of his wider lats and better abs (shape wise)!!..
Paul wins this shot
-
The pic I quoted im seeing as a FDB... what the fuck is it showing up to you as?
In the FDB pic I attached, Dillet is straight up owning Nasser. In that one pic.
Overall I give it to Nasser as the better BB, hes the more complete of 2 incomplete BB's.
yes i was commenting on the last pic. because you had said (the last shot) by mistake then you corrected yourself!!..
-
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_mC1TEdZ4gks/SutkzYidUqI/AAAAAAAABWs/qNFsEgvcoNo/s400/1997-mr-olympia-178.JPG)
All things considered.. Nasser was the better bodybuilder.
Genetically, Dillett trumped everyone - *wow factor*.. forget about it, the guy was a freak... but the he could not control his body.
-
Nassers condition is inferior to Dillets in that pic, check the visible sartorius muscle, and Nassers thicker pecs do not make up for lack of condition, not to mention dillet has better proportion and flow in that one pic.
Like I said, I knew youd nitpick a way for you to see Nasser as better, and you did, despite obviously being behind in condition, not to mention aesthetics, Dillets waist is smaller and his proportions are better.
FYI, I feel the answer to this question is still Nasser is the better BB, but Dillet was the freak of all freaks.
i am very neutral when i tell you i see nasser better in the FDB pose.. just my opinion..
see this one from the mr. o. 97 (but dont look at your hero's arms plz because the thread is not meant to be funny) ;D
stop talking to me as if i am taking a war to prove nasser is better!!.. we all like this shit (arguing about men in thongs) so let's have some fun!!..
-
as you see dillett's lats are very high and considerably narrow in this pose!!.. dillett really needed a wider torso to go with his huge arms and shoulders and also his excellent lower body (at his best)!!..
the best calves on a black man ever by faaaaaaaaaaaaaar!!..
-
both had relatively weak backs but nasser's was bigger and wider!!..
-
;)
Bingo!
-
both had relatively weak backs but nasser's was bigger and wider!!..
relatively weak? no pathetic and out of the two Nasser's was better but it's not saying much.
-
relatively weak? no pathetic and out of the two Nasser's was better but it's not saying much.
till NOC 95 nasser's back was good.. he ruined it later when he added more weight which served his front a little but took a lot from his rear!!.. if he kept competing at around 265 pounds it would have been better!!.. this is why i always see his NOC 95 or huston 95 his best shapes ever!!..
-
served his front a little but took a lot from his rear!!
Outed!
-
till NOC 95 nasser's back was good.. he ruined it later when he added more weight which served his front a little but took a lot from his rear!!.. if he kept competing at around 265 pounds it would have been better!!.. this is why i always see his NOC 95 or huston 95 his best shapes ever!!..
the working word is ' was ' his back was a fuck of a lot better than Paul's ever was
-
;D ;)
-
Outed!
;D
-
dillett just always looked a little "crooked".
anyways great thread, people are actually talking objectivly about nasser and not just "bitter old oily scumbag shit-backed terrorist"
-
;D ;)
:P :P :P
-
something i was always noticing in dillett's rear delts that they were HUGE but always looked like bags of water.. never looked detailed and hard as the ideal shape!!.. i am not saying he was filling anything in them,.. i am sure he had only muscles inside but just his genetics shape!!..
-
something i was always noticing in dillett's rear delts that they were HUGE but always looked like bags of water.. never looked detailed and hard as the ideal shape!!.. i am not saying he was filling anything in them,.. i am sure he had only muscles inside but just his genetics shape!!..
they seemed to take all the work in his back workouts
-
:P :P :P
\
Nasser is owning those guys but you can tell even with the detailed back it's still behind delts & arms which are great compared to latter days his delts were great and his arms showed much better separation , his physique really was great when he was lighter
-
\
Nasser is owning those guys but you can tell even with the detailed back it's still behind delts & arms which are great compared to latter days his delts were great and his arms showed much better separation , his physique really was great when he was lighter
imo at around 260 pounds his back could be better than levrone's back!!..
-
something i was always noticing in dillett's rear delts that they were HUGE but always looked like bags of water.. never looked detailed and hard as the ideal shape!!.. i am not saying he was filling anything in them,.. i am sure he had only muscles inside but just his genetics shape!!..
I posted that I think on page one , his delts were just huge and soft , looked glossy with no separation between the heads or striations
-
imo at around 260 pounds his back could be better than levrone's back!!..
levrone own the shit out of nasser, any bodyparts, its not even close lol
-
imo at around 260 pounds his back could be better than levrone's back!!..
Maybe
-
Dillet a billion times over ..... No contest
-
Nasser's back was not weak.
it was wide , thick and developed.- you can see that in the RLS with Dorian
where it was not quite as good as Dorian was in dryness and seperation. But that is the only pose where Dorian jsut edges Nasser- ONE pose, the BDB, all others Nasser easily over DOrian.
Nasser did not have a weak back.
when you talk of weak backs you should talk of Dillet, Matarazzo, Porter Cottrell
-
perhaps based on their records Nasser was better, but on potential Dillet blew everyone away - I just don't understand how he never really got it together.
-
Someone mentioned it...Nasser was big but Dillet was freaky...just the Wow factor...will always be known for "locking up" I believe at the Arnold and being carried off like a cardboard cut out!
-
haha I wish there was a video of that, so badly!!
-
Dillet had huge potential and he stood out due to the freakiness and also because he was a bit taller than the others, too bad he never learned to pose well.
Nasser was more consistent in his conditioning for most of his career.
This picture is unreal, not sure if its shopped because the proportions are just out of this world.
(http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h29/NeoSeminole/Paul%20Dillet/PaulDillet3a.jpg)
-
Nasser's back was not weak.
it was wide , thick and developed.- you can see that in the RLS with Dorian
where it was not quite as good as Dorian was in dryness and seperation. But that is the only pose where Dorian jsut edges Nasser- ONE pose, the BDB, all others Nasser easily over DOrian.
Nasser did not have a weak back.
when you talk of weak backs you should talk of Dillet, Matarazzo, Porter Cottrell
Nasser had a weak back...get over it
-
I posted that I think on page one , his delts were just huge and soft , looked glossy with no separation between the heads or striations
yes and i seriously hadnt read your post before writing mine!!.. seems that we both agree on many points (of course aside of anything related to dorian as then you are turned to be blind) ;D
-
Dillett was a freak, but Nasser by a mile and in fact.
QFT 8)
-
how does a guy with no mind-muscle connection whatsoever - unable to fully contract a muscle for a pose - build a physique of such dimensions?
its like someone with hooves writing a classic piano symphony
I remember 93 olympia he couldnt do, never mind hold a most muscular, side chest, lat spread...
-
Paul had much better overall genetics for bodyparts (back aside), but onstage his conditioning was lacking, the details and seperation were often not there. His muscle display was horrible. He trained light and rested a long time in between sets. He looked like he'd train high.
Nasser made the most of his genetics and was a better bodybuilder then Paul.
-
Paul had much better overall genetics for bodyparts (back aside), but onstage his conditioning was lacking, the details and seperation were often not there. His muscle display was horrible. He trained light and rested a long time in between sets. He looked like he'd train high.
Nasser made the most of his genetics and was a better bodybuilder then Paul.
x2
-
;D ;)
Dillett looks more symmetrical and has better abs, and fuller rounder muscle bellies...
-
Nasser's back was not weak.
it was wide , thick and developed.- you can see that in the RLS with Dorian
where it was not quite as good as Dorian was in dryness and seperation. But that is the only pose where Dorian jsut edges Nasser- ONE pose, the BDB, all others Nasser easily over DOrian.
Nasser did not have a weak back.
when you talk of weak backs you should talk of Dillet, Matarazzo, Porter Cottrell
You are delusional..
(http://i2.ytimg.com/vi/ZxuLowuxDq4/0.jpg)
(http://i3.ytimg.com/vi/oCFddG4sLow/0.jpg)
-
It could be said that Nasser was better since he placed higher and constantly beat Dillet, also he was 2nd at the O once...I think Dillet's highest placing was 5th or so.
Anyway Nasser's physique at his supposed best still sucked, just another mass monster with no symmetry, no aesthetics, even his conditioning was subpar....couple that with his syntholed bodyparts and its pretty bad.
He did look better when he was lighter.