Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: gh15 on December 30, 2010, 03:03:52 AM

Title: inregarding age
Post by: gh15 on December 30, 2010, 03:03:52 AM
another thign im going to discuess with you friends in the new upcoming year ,,is the importance of age when it comes to bodybilding,,i will make a special posting about how critical age and the early usage of drugs in competetive bodybuilding,,by drugs i mean hormones,,it will also be after jan 1 when i have more time,, the importance of age in bodybuilding is critical,,unlike what you red on board on internet the earlier you start hormonizing the better bodybuilder you will become,,it has very little to do with natural foundation and more to do with the human body and aging proess,,
to be continud in 2011

gh15 approved
Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: jeremyj on December 30, 2010, 03:07:09 AM
Shawn Ray was a great Junior and went on from there as did Lee Haney and most Pros were great teens and juniors. ;)
Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: Van_Bilderass on December 30, 2010, 06:52:27 AM
I love these board gurus who recommend starting juicing no earlier than 21-25, preaching patience and how bodybuilding is marathon, not a sprint.  :D

You will never peak at the right time or hit your potential this way.

Some champions, like Arnold and Haney were already out of bodybuilding by the time these gurus recommend starting the drugs. ::) Juicing as a kid has certain consequences and you can't decide if it was worth it until after, but from a longevity perspective, Haney's and Arnold's way was probably best.
Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: Stavios on December 30, 2010, 07:35:05 AM
17-18 years old already at Gs of test plus thai pinks. I was born by the gospel of GH15
living the dream bro
Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: lesaucer on December 30, 2010, 04:11:17 PM
god what is minimum age for HGH!?
Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: Disgusted on December 30, 2010, 04:13:46 PM
I love these board gurus who recommend starting juicing no earlier than 21-25, preaching patience and how bodybuilding is marathon, not a sprint.  :D

You will never peak at the right time or hit your potential this way.

Some champions, like Arnold and Haney were already out of bodybuilding by the time these gurus recommend starting the drugs. ::) Juicing as a kid has certain consequences and you can't decide if it was worth it until after, but from a longevity perspective, Haney's and Arnold's way was probably best.

Exactly, look at Cutler, Vic Richards, Priest, I could go on and on.
Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: Master Blaster on December 30, 2010, 04:14:36 PM
god what is minimum age for HGH!?

11-12 if you have access to cadaver HGH
Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: el numero uno on December 30, 2010, 05:11:58 PM
Exactly, look at Cutler, Vic Richards, Priest, I could go on and on.

Yeah but maybe Priest it's not a good example, he's what? 5'1''?
Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: no one on December 30, 2010, 05:48:44 PM
I love these board gurus who recommend starting juicing no earlier than 21-25, preaching patience and how bodybuilding is marathon, not a sprint.  :D

You will never peak at the right time or hit your potential this way.

Some champions, like Arnold and Haney were already out of bodybuilding by the time these gurus recommend starting the drugs. ::) Juicing as a kid has certain consequences and you can't decide if it was worth it until after, but from a longevity perspective, Haney's and Arnold's way was probably best.

i didn't start saucing until i was 26. i didnt start using GH until 2 years ago. i couldnt recommend more someone wait as long as they can before starting- especially maxing out their development using anabolics before starting GH. for some reason i have noticed the longer you use anabolics to build your base before using GH, and then using GH in smaller doses to keep growing the quality of physique is so much better, looks healthier and keeps a nice symmetry.

i guess it all depends on your goals. mine was to build the kind of physique you saw in the late 80's/ early 90's. big, attainable and healthy looking. someone looking to compete at any level these days is going to have to make a decision to juice early and a lot at what consequences? i wouldn't have changed a thing i did to get to where i am. i think building it slowly benefited me. anyone looking to compete though just doesnt have that luxury. guess it all comes dow to what you want, what your willing to do, and what your willing to sacrifice to get there.

Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: Wiggs on December 30, 2010, 06:34:50 PM
Cadaver by age 9 or bust.
Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: kevinf on December 30, 2010, 07:04:14 PM
Cadaver by age 9 or bust.

cadaver by age 9, nasty mutant by age 10, olympia stage ready age 11.

Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: Wiggs on December 30, 2010, 07:05:15 PM
cadaver by age 9, nasty mutant by age 10, olympia stage ready age 11.



lol
Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: Fatpanda on December 30, 2010, 07:09:27 PM
i didn't start saucing until i was 26. i didnt start using GH until 2 years ago. i couldnt recommend more someone wait as long as they can before starting- especially maxing out their development using anabolics before starting GH. for some reason i have noticed the longer you use anabolics to build your base before using GH, and then using GH in smaller doses to keep growing the quality of physique is so much better, looks healthier and keeps a nice symmetry.

  i guess it all depends on your goals. mine was to build the kind of physique you saw in the late 80's/ early 90's. big, attainable and healthy looking. someone looking to compete at any level these days is going to have to make a decision to juice early and a lot at what consequences? i wouldn't have changed a thing i did to get to where i am. i think building it slowly benefited me. anyone looking to compete though just doesnt have that luxury. guess it all comes dow to what you want, what your willing to do, and what your willing to sacrifice to get there.



hahahahahahahahahaha you couldn't make this up.
Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: lesaucer on December 30, 2010, 07:18:44 PM
hahahahahahahahahaha you couldn't make this up.

even if that was really him, he'd look better than you... you are not in position to laugh at other people physique..fatty
Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: johnnynoname on December 30, 2010, 07:29:55 PM
hahahahahahahahahaha you couldn't make this up.

amigo, you saying something disparaging about someone else's physique is like a retard making fun of a Harvard Professor's thesis on Quantum Physics
Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: Fatpanda on December 30, 2010, 07:46:37 PM
even if that was really him, he'd look better than you... you are not in position to laugh at other people physique..fatty

lol hi no one's gimmick.

looking good chief !
Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: dyslexic on December 30, 2010, 07:52:02 PM
B lookin 4 word 2 it
Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: roccoginge on December 30, 2010, 09:08:34 PM
I waited till 21, and by then was benching about 450 natural.  I would advise all young people to wait.  I got lucky and was able to train with a pro a few years later.  I did not take the same same as this man.  What a crazy genetic freak though, 265 at 5'7" with shredded glutes.  He definitely told me his bodyfat level was do to drugs.  The leanest I've been at 5'6", is 225.  The man was unreal.
Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: Jack T. Cross on December 30, 2010, 09:43:16 PM
I waited till 21, and by then was benching about 450 natural.  I would advise all young people to wait.  I got lucky and was able to train with a pro a few years later.  I did not take the same same as this man.  What a crazy genetic freak though, 265 at 5'7" with shredded glutes.  He definitely told me his bodyfat level was do to drugs.  The leanest I've been at 5'6", is 225.  The man was unreal.

Where's a pic, big guy?
Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: Coach is Back! on December 30, 2010, 09:57:50 PM
Let's just say I started when Dr. Kerr was alive as well as Walzak!
Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: Meso_z on December 31, 2010, 02:49:37 AM
lol hi no one's gimmick.

looking good chief !
Do you have mental problems fatso?
Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: dj181 on December 31, 2010, 03:01:58 AM
I've gotta admit that I am most interested in what God has to say as far as overeating is concerned, and I'm guessing that this will apply to natural trainers as well, it should be quite interesting.
Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: j3di3 on December 31, 2010, 03:04:40 AM
I waited till 21, and by then was benching about 450 natural.  I would advise all young people to wait.  I got lucky and was able to train with a pro a few years later.  I did not take the same same as this man.  What a crazy genetic freak though, 265 at 5'7" with shredded glutes.  He definitely told me his bodyfat level was do to drugs.  The leanest I've been at 5'6", is 225.  The man was unreal.

i bet you have much to tell about that   ::)
Title: Re: inregarding age
Post by: MAXX on December 31, 2010, 03:06:51 AM
around 15 seems to be the right age to start juicin if you want to be a champion.

See Cutler, see Arnold, see Dorian, See Shawn Rey. See every successfull pro with exeption of Ronnie Coleman, he started at 18  :D