Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: The RedMeatKid on July 02, 2011, 07:44:51 PM

Title: MD Magazine
Post by: The RedMeatKid on July 02, 2011, 07:44:51 PM
Thoughts?
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: BikiniSlut on July 02, 2011, 07:49:12 PM
Awesome thread. Interesting AND bodybuilding related.

A+.


























 ::) ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: The RedMeatKid on July 02, 2011, 07:51:52 PM
Your mother's pussy felt like a rolled up newspaper full of cold oatmeal.
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: ManBearPig... on July 02, 2011, 07:54:23 PM
because fantasy movies draw in crowds?
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: jr on July 02, 2011, 07:54:52 PM
It has become standard fare in Hollywood for minority women, usually black, to play police chiefs, mayors, CIA big shots, university deans, police commisioners, detectives, judges, etc. They usually are reprimanding bumbling white men who are evil, spiteful, and incompetent. While this might "feel good" to certain people, is this an accurate reflection of reality? 

Who are creating these movies?

Mattc might know the reason?
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: ManBearPig... on July 02, 2011, 07:58:22 PM
Hollywood is creating them. How many movies do you see where a female black police chief is bossing men around?

meh, it's like all those 80's buddy cop movies where the police chief was black.

don't worry, i don't think "change" is happening in reality anytime soon.
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: WillGrant on July 02, 2011, 07:58:40 PM
Your mother's pussy felt like a rolled up newspaper full of cold oatmeal.
Haha I like that one  :D
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: bradistani on July 02, 2011, 07:59:28 PM
cos claudette is awesome and white men are indeed bumbling idiots. god, i miss the sheild  :'(

(http://images2.fanpop.com/image/photos/11100000/Claudette-Wyms-the-shield-11123761-700-1024.jpg)
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on July 02, 2011, 08:15:30 PM
Your mother's pussy felt like a rolled up newspaper full of cold oatmeal.

hahaha
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: SF1900 on July 02, 2011, 08:21:53 PM
cos claudette is awesome and white men are indeed bumbling idiots. god, i miss the sheild  :'(

(http://images2.fanpop.com/image/photos/11100000/Claudette-Wyms-the-shield-11123761-700-1024.jpg)

WUHI? :o :o
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: bradistani on July 02, 2011, 08:25:47 PM
WUHI? :o :o

no  :-X
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Matt C on July 02, 2011, 08:33:13 PM
It has become standard fare in Hollywood for minority women, usually black, to play police chiefs, mayors, CIA big shots, university deans, police commisioners, detectives, judges, etc. They usually are reprimanding bumbling white men who are evil, spiteful, and incompetent. While this might "feel good" to certain people, is this an accurate reflection of reality? 

Cultural Marxism.

It doesn't bother me that certain groups have higher intelligence than the group I am a part, have greater strength, running ability, and on and on.  But can we just accept that we are not all equal?  Basing social policy on lies cannot possibly lead to anything good.  That's my objection with this agenda.  Marxists knew that Marxism in economic terms would fail miserably in the USA, so the Frankfurt school brought it over in cultural terms instead.  Well guess what?  It's still failing miserably!  Just the way it was intended to fail.  The multicultural agenda was intended to create a a new Mexico, where all the races mix to become one mixed race group.  But in reality, it's failing like Brazil - there are many people of different races here, all segregated and more or less ignoring each other.

Doh!

Race mixing agenda fail.
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: DK II on July 02, 2011, 08:35:56 PM
Answer: Because most Americans are dumb enough to believe everything they see in the movies. It's a way to keep the minorities from revolting.  ;D ;D
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: SF1900 on July 02, 2011, 08:37:51 PM
no  :-X

LOL  :D :D
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: The Abdominal Snoman on July 02, 2011, 08:38:06 PM
Hollywood is creating them. How many movies do you see where a female black police chief is bossing men around?

Its who controls Hollywood and their agenda ;)
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: The Abdominal Snoman on July 02, 2011, 08:40:34 PM
Cultural Marxism.

It doesn't bother me that certain groups have higher intelligence than the group I am a part, have greater strength, running ability, and on and on.  But can we just accept that we are not all equal?  Basing social policy on lies cannot possibly lead to anything good.  That's my objection with this agenda.  Marxists knew that Marxism in economic terms would fail miserably in the USA, so the Frankfurt school brought it over in cultural terms instead.  Well guess what?  It's still failing miserably!  Just the way it was intended to fail.  The multicultural agenda was intended to create a a new Mexico, where all the races mix to become one mixed race group.  But in reality, it's failing like Brazil - there are many people of different races here, all segregated and more or less ignoring each other.

Doh!

Race mixing agenda fail.

Thats why 'they" are going after the children's minds. MTV etc.
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Matt C on July 02, 2011, 08:48:12 PM
Thats why 'they" are going after the children's minds. MTV etc.

Yeah I know...I am very concerned as to what I let my children watch.  I assume Barney is alright but so many shows are rife with propaganda.  I don't mind them learning about the evils of the Axis Powers in WWII...as long as they learn the evils of communism first.  Some context goes a long way for some issues.
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: bradistani on July 02, 2011, 08:48:56 PM
Cultural Marxism.

It doesn't bother me that certain groups have higher intelligence than the group I am a part, have greater strength, running ability, and on and on.  But can we just accept that we are not all equal?  Basing social policy on lies cannot possibly lead to anything good.  That's my objection with this agenda.  Marxists knew that Marxism in economic terms would fail miserably in the USA, so the Frankfurt school brought it over in cultural terms instead.  Well guess what?  It's still failing miserably!  Just the way it was intended to fail.  The multicultural agenda was intended to create a a new Mexico, where all the races mix to become one mixed race group.  But in reality, it's failing like Brazil - there are many people of different races here, all segregated and more or less ignoring each other.

Doh!

Race mixing agenda fail.

i bet you don't have many friends i the real world, do you ?   :D
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: DK II on July 02, 2011, 08:49:34 PM
Yeah I know...I am very concerned as to what I let my children watch.  I assume Barney is alright but so many shows are rife with propaganda.  I don't mind them learning about the evils of the Axis Powers in WWII...as long as they learn the evils of communism first.  Some context goes a long way for some issues.

Damn, you're really an idiot.
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: bradistani on July 02, 2011, 08:54:08 PM
i remember one time sledge threw a paper aeroplane and it got stuck in trunks afro  ;D ;D ;D ;D sledge ruled

(http://www.sledgehammeronline.de/files/upload/image/CharaktereDarsteller/Captain_Trunk.jpg)
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Matt C on July 02, 2011, 08:54:27 PM
i bet you don't have many friends i the real world, do you ?   :D

Do you care to explain to me what the long-term goal of all of this is, if not exactly what I just described.

Damn, you're really an idiot.

I can't gather from this response what your thoughts are on the war.  Maybe if you explained yourself beyond a five word reply I could.  My thoughts are that the winners of war write the history books which is why the Axis has been described as being some one-sided gang in a war where all sides took the lives of millions.  The evils of communism, the Ukrainian famine before the war and its perpetrators - all of these things are ignored.  As an Italian, I don't particularly care for the way Italy has been treated which is why I object to the war propaganda movies.

Discuss.
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: bradistani on July 02, 2011, 09:09:27 PM
Do you care to explain to me what the long-term goal of all of this is, if not exactly what I just described.



i don't have to explain owt. you know exactly what i'm on about.

apart from bitter racist like yourself, i bet you have very few real friends.

Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Hereford on July 02, 2011, 09:22:26 PM
It has become standard fare in Hollywood for minority women, usually black, to play police chiefs, mayors, CIA big shots, university deans, police commisioners, detectives, judges, etc. They usually are reprimanding bumbling white men who are evil, spiteful, and incompetent. While this might "feel good" to certain people, is this an accurate reflection of reality? 

The movies are fantasy. Successful negros fit right in.
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Parker on July 02, 2011, 09:39:57 PM
Yeah I know...I am very concerned as to what I let my children watch.  I assume Barney is alright but so many shows are rife with propaganda.  I don't mind them learning about the evils of the Axis Powers in WWII...as long as they learn the evils of communism first.  Some context goes a long way for some issues.
Your kids are fucked with you as a parent....

Kids don't have problems, adults do...especially ones with agendas

You better save up for a therapist...

Are you gonna give you son (if you have a son) bowl cuts to keep money away from the propagandists (you have to look good with excellent hair symmetry)
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: pillowtalk on July 03, 2011, 12:45:35 AM
Cultural Marxism.

It doesn't bother me that certain groups have higher intelligence than the group I am a part, have greater strength, running ability, and on and on.  But can we just accept that we are not all equal?  Basing social policy on lies cannot possibly lead to anything good.  That's my objection with this agenda.  Marxists knew that Marxism in economic terms would fail miserably in the USA, so the Frankfurt school brought it over in cultural terms instead.  Well guess what?  It's still failing miserably!  Just the way it was intended to fail.  The multicultural agenda was intended to create a a new Mexico, where all the races mix to become one mixed race group.  But in reality, it's failing like Brazil - there are many people of different races here, all segregated and more or less ignoring each other.

Doh!

Race mixing agenda fail.

Matt-c kicking the reality of the situation for us.............
This from a clown who still subscribes to 'boasian anthropology' voodoo - honestly, canning, just fuck off.

It has been proven in thread after thread, that you just do not grasp the reality of this concept.

If you spent as much time (that you keep complaining that you lack) on your own board, as you do poncing around on the net in general.
You would be looking at 60K by now, shit, maybe even 40K.
What with you having kids to feed & all, spastic.

PT
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: pillowtalk on July 03, 2011, 01:08:22 AM
Your kids are fucked with you as a parent....

Kids don't have problems, adult do...especially ones with agendas

You better save up for a therapist...


Parker, this is mighty rich coming from you.
There you are trampling over 1000's of your own ape-like women to get to one of north-Western, European origin.
Yet another White female (who could have produced off-spring with an IQ of over 120) giving her kids a down grade in intelligence.

What is wrong with your women Parker?? is it even a conscious (internal dialogue) discussion, for you?? or is it your 'DNA' subconsciously screaming for an up-grade??

So like what, you don't fancy dropping your seed in this??
Discuss.

PT



Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: wes on July 03, 2011, 01:11:52 AM
meh, it's like all those 80's buddy cop movies where the police chief was black.
Every fucking movie made back then had a black police captain,commisioner,or chief.  ;D
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Parker on July 03, 2011, 01:34:25 AM
Parker, this is mighty rich coming from you.
There you are trampling over 1000's of your own ape-like women to get to one of north-Western, European origin.Yet another White female (who could have produced off-spring with an IQ of over 120) giving her kids a down grade in intelligence.

What is wrong with your women Parker?? is it even a conscious (internal dialogue) discussion, for you?? or is it your 'DNA' subconsciously screaming for an up-grade??

So like what, you don't fancy dropping your seed in this??
Discuss.

PT




You make an assumption---I am not like this. I think all women are beautiful...but, I don't run, skip, hop, and jump over black women just to get with a white woman.

And yeah, I'd hit that...
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: pillowtalk on July 03, 2011, 01:44:39 AM
You make an assumption---I am not like this. I think all women are beautiful...but, I don't run, skip, hop, and jump over black women just to get with a white woman.

And yeah, I'd hit that...

So what race of female are you currently hitting, & pray tell - you got kids??

PT
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Tito24 on July 03, 2011, 01:47:25 AM
last time i saw a movie or serie with a black president, "24" or something. haha how unrealistic.
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Parker on July 03, 2011, 02:33:31 AM
So what race of female are you currently hitting, & pray tell - you got kids??

PT
No kids (thank god). And the "woman (s)" are black.
last time i saw a movie or serie with a black president, "24" or something.  ;D
You forgot Tiny Lister in Fourth Element...now that was unrealistic 
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: The_Hammer on July 03, 2011, 02:42:15 AM


(http://www.topnews.in/files/Condoleezza-Rice_2.jpg)

(http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/images_sg/rmbenjamin.jpg)
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Parker on July 03, 2011, 03:06:48 AM

(http://www.topnews.in/files/Condoleezza-Rice_2.jpg)

(http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/images_sg/rmbenjamin.jpg)
Condoleezza Rice would probably have made a better President than Bush or Obama
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: DK II on July 03, 2011, 03:48:34 AM
Condoleezza Rice would probably have made a better President than Bush or Obama

Ronald McDonald would make a better president than those two.  ::)
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Roger Bacon on July 03, 2011, 03:56:17 AM
It has become standard fare in Hollywood for minority women, usually black, to play police chiefs, mayors, CIA big shots, university deans, police commisioners, detectives, judges, etc. They usually are reprimanding bumbling white men who are evil, spiteful, and incompetent. While this might "feel good" to certain people, is this an accurate reflection of reality? 

I've often wondered about this.  It's annoying, and inaccurate.
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: DK II on July 03, 2011, 03:59:50 AM
I've often wondered about this.  It's annoying, and inaccurate.

Yes, because movies that depict normal everyday life as accurately as possible are the best.  ::) ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Roger Bacon on July 03, 2011, 04:03:47 AM
Yes, because movies that depict normal everyday life as accurately as possible are the best.  ::) ::) ::) ::)

These portrayals don't add anything to the movies except some bizarre element. 

I'm surprised they didn't cast the old man in Gran Torino differently...   ::)
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Parker on July 03, 2011, 04:12:28 AM
I've often wondered about this.  It's annoying, and inaccurate.
Actually, it's not...

I don't know where Redmeatkid lives, but I personally know of black female judges, professors, attorney's , State's Attorneys, CIA, and FBI, NSA, NIH....
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Roger Bacon on July 03, 2011, 04:18:34 AM
Actually, it's not...

I don't know where Redmeatkid lives, but I personally know of black female judges, professors, attorney's , State's Attorneys, CIA, and FBI, NSA, NIH....

I do too, but they're not close to as common in real life as they are portrayed to be in the movies.
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: DK II on July 03, 2011, 04:30:17 AM
I do too, but they're not close to as common in real life as they are portrayed to be in the movies.

LOL, yes, because movies are all about what is common, i.e. exploding cars, alien invasions, killing 10.000 enemy soldiers without changing your magazine while in reverse non of them even scratches you despite the fact you stand in an open field and so on and so on....
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Roger Bacon on July 03, 2011, 04:31:23 AM
LOL, yes, because movies are all about what is common, i.e. exploding cars, alien invasions, killing 10.000 enemy soldiers without changing your magazine while in reverse non of them even scratches you despite the fact you stand in an open field and so on and so on....

You got me, I feel stupid...

Fuck off

 ;D

Seriously though, this ass-backwards casting has no entertainment value.  It's just off...
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: US MUSL on July 03, 2011, 04:35:18 AM
Condy Rice

Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: DK II on July 03, 2011, 04:38:52 AM
You got me, I feel stupid...

Fuck off

 ;D

Seriously though, this ass-backwards casting has no entertainment value.  It's just off...

True, they would never let a white cop investigate in the hood like in "Training Day".  ::) ::)
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Parker on July 03, 2011, 05:04:00 AM
I do too, but they're not close to as common in real life as they are portrayed to be in the movies.
Uh yeah, they are...alot, well in my area (Washington, DC area)I won't name drop...
but,  those listed shot callers, I've seen my fair share...
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: The RedMeatKid on July 03, 2011, 07:02:31 AM
Name some.
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: chunkramwell on July 03, 2011, 07:09:05 AM
I believe that there would be better race relations in the US if more African American men had moustaches, it's a good look for them.
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: kh300 on July 03, 2011, 07:18:19 AM
I believe that there would be better race relations in the US if more African American men had moustaches, it's a good look for them.

I agree. They seem less frightening with them. Gives them that uncle next door look.
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: wes on July 03, 2011, 07:29:08 AM
LOL @ DK !!  ;D
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: _bruce_ on July 03, 2011, 11:03:05 AM
Cultural Marxism.

It doesn't bother me that certain groups have higher intelligence than the group I am a part, have greater strength, running ability, and on and on.  But can we just accept that we are not all equal?  Basing social policy on lies cannot possibly lead to anything good.  That's my objection with this agenda.  Marxists knew that Marxism in economic terms would fail miserably in the USA, so the Frankfurt school brought it over in cultural terms instead.  Well guess what?  It's still failing miserably!  Just the way it was intended to fail.  The multicultural agenda was intended to create a a new Mexico, where all the races mix to become one mixed race group.  But in reality, it's failing like Brazil - there are many people of different races here, all segregated and more or less ignoring each other.

Doh!

Race mixing agenda fail.

Lies are everywhere - why should stuff like this be handled differently?
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Dr Dutch on July 03, 2011, 11:04:46 AM
It has become standard fare in Hollywood for minority women, usually black, to play police chiefs, mayors, CIA big shots, university deans, police commisioners, detectives, judges, etc. They usually are reprimanding bumbling white men who are evil, spiteful, and incompetent. While this might "feel good" to certain people, is this an accurate reflection of reality? 
Because movies are fiction..
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Matt C on July 03, 2011, 01:33:43 PM
i don't have to explain owt. you know exactly what i'm on about.

apart from bitter racist like yourself, i bet you have very few real friends.



You can scream racist as much as you want but it's like "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" and the more people scream it, the less people take it seriously.  The mainstream media is literally collapsing by the day.  News programs continue to see a declining audience in lieu of the rise of the internet media which is now becoming the mainstream media.

Matt-c kicking the reality of the situation for us.............
This from a clown who still subscribes to 'boasian anthropology' voodoo - honestly, canning, just fuck off.

It has been proven in thread after thread, that you just do not grasp the reality of this concept.

If you spent as much time (that you keep complaining that you lack) on your own board, as you do poncing around on the net in general.
You would be looking at 60K by now, shit, maybe even 40K.
What with you having kids to feed & all, spastic.

PT

I subscribe to Boasian Anthropology?  Are you trolling me?  LOL...ok yeah, you would have to be to claim I subscribe to such fraud.

No rebuttal offered anywhere in your blurb.  I claimed as a general statement that the purpose of multiculturalism is to mix European DNA out of existence but that in order to do that people would have to mix, and this is not happening nearly as much as you would think.  People voluntarily self-segregate when given the chance and aren't exactly assimilating together.  Another thing is, given the suicidal birthrates facing all Western people [and the Japanese for that matter], the influx of immigration will continue.  The solution would be to have children and reverse these demographic trends.

I always love when you come back and claim "Oh your post is so stupid" without explaining why.  Yeah, it's just so stupid but...but what?  Try explaining yourself.  Please, you're amongst friends here, don't be shy.
Title: Re: MD Magazine
Post by: Matt C on July 03, 2011, 01:34:25 PM
MD Magazine - Thoughts?

It's honestly the best.
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: tbombz on July 03, 2011, 01:37:16 PM
Your mother's pussy felt like a rolled up newspaper full of cold oatmeal.
  ;D


id still hit that tho
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: tbombz on July 03, 2011, 01:41:12 PM
Cultural Marxism.

It doesn't bother me that certain groups have higher intelligence than the group I am a part, have greater strength, running ability, and on and on.  But can we just accept that we are not all equal?  Basing social policy on lies cannot possibly lead to anything good.  That's my objection with this agenda.  Marxists knew that Marxism in economic terms would fail miserably in the USA, so the Frankfurt school brought it over in cultural terms instead.  Well guess what?  It's still failing miserably!  Just the way it was intended to fail.  The multicultural agenda was intended to create a a new Mexico, where all the races mix to become one mixed race group.  But in reality, it's failing like Brazil - there are many people of different races here, all segregated and more or less ignoring each other.

Doh!

Race mixing agenda fail.
ur such a fucking tool matt

marxism has nothing to do with presupposing equality, its main tenant is that there is no such thing as private property, that the use of the planets resources is of the upmost importance and that no person or perosn(s) has the right to irresponsibly use those resources, or to inhibit others from responsibly using them.

please stop listening to conservtaive fucktards with zero objectivity
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: tbombz on July 03, 2011, 01:43:17 PM
Yeah I know...I am very concerned as to what I let my children watch.  I assume Barney is alright but so many shows are rife with propaganda.  I don't mind them learning about the evils of the Axis Powers in WWII...as long as they learn the evils of communism first.  Some context goes a long way for some issues.
the "evils" of communism.  ::) mccarthy is waiting for you in the afterlife, u two are going to get along great
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: dr.chimps on July 03, 2011, 02:00:14 PM
cos claudette is awesome and white men are indeed bumbling idiots. god, i miss the sheild  :'(

(http://images2.fanpop.com/image/photos/11100000/Claudette-Wyms-the-shield-11123761-700-1024.jpg)
Looks like Bernie Casey in drag.
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Matt C on July 03, 2011, 03:21:47 PM
ur such a fucking tool matt

marxism has nothing to do with presupposing equality, its main tenant is that there is no such thing as private property, that the use of the planets resources is of the upmost importance and that no person or perosn(s) has the right to irresponsibly use those resources, or to inhibit others from responsibly using them.

please stop listening to conservtaive fucktards with zero objectivity

So you disagree with private property while utilizing it to type this post?  Clearly you enjoy your private property rights on a daily basis, so why are you bashing a system which offers its protection?  Everyone says that communism in the 20th century is "not true communism" yet there doesn't seem to be many examples showing what true communism really is, beyond idealism.  The idea of communism is pleasant I suppose, it's just that it doesn't work.
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: w8m8 on July 03, 2011, 04:15:40 PM
The solution would be to have children and reverse these demographic trends.

If you think your offspring are going to add anything of value to this world .. you're sadly [as usual] delusional

You have a twisted faulty mind that can only guarantee they will be more fucked up than you are .. post up anything you can say is going to be fundamentally a benefit to your children by virtue of being born vis a vis you being their "father" <- a term you don't deserve .. sperm donor is more fitting
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: w8m8 on July 03, 2011, 04:55:50 PM
ur such a fucking tool matt

marxism has nothing to do with presupposing equality, its main tenant is that there is no such thing as private property, that the use of the planets resources is of the upmost importance and that no person or person(s) has the right to irresponsibly use those resources, or to inhibit others from responsibly using them.

please stop listening to conservtaive fucktards with zero objectivity


Hhahahaha, jahahahahahahaha no, hahahahahahaha!!

Honestly, by your above post you - squalid little gay boy  - have revealed you know FUCK ALL of the cultural marxists Matt speaks off!

Whether race equality, sexual equality, feminism and the attendent political correctness thereof, these are ALL products of cultural marxism, of which, was born of the jewish academics at "the Frankfurt School" in order to subvert the west:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism

Theodore Adorno, Max horkheimer and Herbert Marcuse (all jews as were 99.9% of the frankfurt school 'intellectuals') would be immensely pleased to see you doing their bidding... jism filled white goyim that you are!

Not only are you a vile screwer of blacks, but you have a) fuck all knowledge of the agenda you serve by doing so, much less those whom birthed said agenda, and b) just "why" you are the thus-wise vile degenerate that we know and loathe!

Seriously, Taylor, kill yourself!

Quote
marxism has nothing to do with presupposing equality

Hhahahahahahahahaha, ahahahahahahaha, wanker!

Quoted again, so good was it the first time
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: tbombz on July 03, 2011, 08:04:41 PM
So you disagree with private property while utilizing it to type this post?  Clearly you enjoy your private property rights on a daily basis, so why are you bashing a system which offers its protection?


i never bashed any system, you did.

the right to private property does not allow me to use a computer. my parents productive participation in society does. thats where the money comes from to buy it. without the right to private property, we could still buy and use anything we want. there is no connection to be made.




  Everyone says that communism in the 20th century is "not true communism" yet there doesn't seem to be many examples showing what true communism really is, beyond idealism.  The idea of communism is pleasant I suppose, it's just that it doesn't work.

its weakness that caused its failure is centralization of power. that can be modified without altering the fundamental attributes. .

Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: tbombz on July 03, 2011, 08:07:05 PM

Hhahahaha, jahahahahahahaha no, hahahahahahaha!!

Honestly, by your above post you - squalid little gay boy  - have revealed you know FUCK ALL of the cultural marxists Matt speaks off!

Whether race equality, sexual equality, feminism and the attendent political correctness thereof, these are ALL products of cultural marxism, of which, was born of the jewish academics at "the Frankfurt School" in order to subvert the west:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism

Theodore Adorno, Max horkheimer and Herbert Marcuse (all jews as were 99.9% of the frankfurt school 'intellectuals') would be immensely pleased to see you doing their bidding... jism filled white goyim that you are!

Not only are you a vile screwer of blacks, but you have a) fuck all knowledge of the agenda you serve by doing so, much less those whom birthed said agenda, and b) just "why" you are the thus-wise vile degenerate that we know and loathe!

Seriously, Taylor, kill yourself!

Hhahahahahahahahaha, ahahahahahahaha, wanker!

Quoted again, so good was it the first time


meltdown  ;D


 my post had absolutely nothing to do with "cultural marxism".

 
Title: Re: MD Magazine
Post by: WillGrant on July 03, 2011, 08:09:26 PM
How the fuck did I end up in a thread titled MD magazine  ???
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Matt C on July 03, 2011, 09:38:27 PM
Here is a good introduction to the Frankfurt School:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8630135369495797236

If I can make a general statement, communism was the deadliest force in the 20th century and no other political ideology came close to its death toll.  And it makes no difference what communists and egalitarians claim will be the end result of communism - it never works out that way in practice and makes everyone worse off.  Before painting Italy and Germany as being evil during WWII, let's get some notion of what they were fighting:



Was no one supposed to stand up to this and fight back?
Title: Re: MD Magazine
Post by: Matt C on July 03, 2011, 09:42:30 PM
How the fuck did I end up in a thread titled MD magazine  ???

It's honestly a great magazine.
Title: Re: MD Magazine
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on July 03, 2011, 09:45:25 PM
-
Title: Re: MD Magazine
Post by: WillGrant on July 03, 2011, 09:48:56 PM
- (http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=387722.0;attach=419367;image)
This  :P
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: chris-a on July 03, 2011, 10:00:35 PM
Do you care to explain to me what the long-term goal of all of this is, if not exactly what I just described.

I can't gather from this response what your thoughts are on the war.  Maybe if you explained yourself beyond a five word reply I could.  My thoughts are that the winners of war write the history books which is why the Axis has been described as being some one-sided gang in a war where all sides took the lives of millions.  The evils of communism, the Ukrainian famine before the war and its perpetrators - all of these things are ignored.  As an Italian, I don't particularly care for the way Italy has been treated which is why I object to the war propaganda movies.

Discuss.

do you mean as in italian tanks having 10 reverse gears and one forward gear in case the enemy attack from behind?
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: DK II on July 04, 2011, 01:23:31 AM
do you mean as in italian tanks having 10 reverse gears and one forward gear in case the enemy attack from behind?


 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

You mean in case the enemy attacks from the front. Italians are fucking cowards.
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: tlc on July 04, 2011, 03:35:07 AM
i remember one time sledge threw a paper aeroplane and it got stuck in trunks afro  ;D ;D ;D ;D sledge ruled

(http://www.sledgehammeronline.de/files/upload/image/CharaktereDarsteller/Captain_Trunk.jpg)

Thanks for reminding me of this, just d/loaded both seasons, happy trip down memory lane...  :)
Title: Re: MD Magazine
Post by: WillGrant on July 04, 2011, 04:02:20 AM
It's honestly a great magazine.

Other than the supplement ads and lies its ok
Title: Re: MD Magazine
Post by: DK II on July 04, 2011, 04:20:22 AM
Other than the supplement ads and lies its ok

 :o :o :o :o

What's left then?
Title: Re: MD Magazine
Post by: WillGrant on July 04, 2011, 04:20:58 AM
:o :o :o :o

What's left then?
Spot on  ;D
Title: Re: MD Magazine
Post by: Dr Dutch on July 04, 2011, 04:58:00 AM
Quit fucking with the thread title... >:( >:(
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Jaerson on July 04, 2011, 11:47:56 AM
cos claudette is awesome and white men are indeed bumbling idiots. god, i miss the sheild  :'(

(http://images2.fanpop.com/image/photos/11100000/Claudette-Wyms-the-shield-11123761-700-1024.jpg)
lol...Online Pharmacy (http://"http://www.toprxpharmacy.com")lololol
Title: Re: MD Magazine
Post by: Matt C on July 04, 2011, 12:09:23 PM
Other than the supplement ads and lies its ok

The magazine does have a lot of ads in it but I like the articles which include scientific references.  In case you don't agree with an article you can check out the research from which it is derived.  Solid magazine, in my opinion.
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: tbombz on July 04, 2011, 12:19:31 PM
Here is a good introduction to the Frankfurt School:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8630135369495797236

If I can make a general statement, communism was the deadliest force in the 20th century and no other political ideology came close to its death toll.  And it makes no difference what communists and egalitarians claim will be the end result of communism - it never works out that way in practice and makes everyone worse off.  Before painting Italy and Germany as being evil during WWII, let's get some notion of what they were fighting:



Was no one supposed to stand up to this and fight back?

totalitarianism was the most deadliest force. not communism. your being a fucking moron. and germany was not fighting against anything, they were fighting for their own greed. idiot
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Matt C on July 04, 2011, 12:21:46 PM
totalitarianism was the most deadliest force. not communism. your being a fucking moron. and germany was not fighting against anything, they were fighting for their own greed. idiot

And is there a time when communism in practice does not lead to totalitarianism?  And was the Soviet Union not operating on greed?
Title: Re: MD Magazine
Post by: w8m8 on July 04, 2011, 12:43:28 PM
The magazine does have a lot of ads in it but I like the articles which include scientific references.

Yeah, "solid" articles and references from Robbie Durand.(1)

LOL, could you be anymore of an ignorant wanker than you currently are?

Do you actually possess any technical information?

Dude, you do know, that you are not obliged to post in order you receive those free supps you swallow in the fashion of a "greedy gulper at the glory hole"! (2)

Whats does Robbie say about that Karposi Sarcoma creeping all over your fucking skin?(3)

Sources:
1) Robbie Durand - moron or mongol?; NY Times 2007.
2) Matt Canning voted most popular pig bottom, Leather Daddy Magazine 2007
3) HIV positive AIDS campaigner, Matt Canning: "The Greatest Gift: Living with AIDS, My Story"; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaposi%27s_sarcoma

Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: tbombz on July 04, 2011, 12:54:19 PM
And is there a time when communism in practice does not lead to totalitarianism?  And was the Soviet Union not operating on greed?

can a communist society avoid totalitarian rule?  it hasnt in the past but if it is to be true communism then it HAS to avoid it. communism is a system without a leader. marx never specified exactly how this should be done, but its clear its the way he wanted it.

the tyranny and oppression of the people who have seized power in countries that have tired communism is the evil, not communism itself.  and to prevent this evil one must not dismiss communism but make a modification to it that disallows the accumulation of power into the hands of one, or a few.

the soviet union did not start the war. germany did. any attempt to diminish hitlers role as the sole cause of ww2 is woefully ignorant. germany was not fighting against russia. they were fighting for themselves. remember, germany was allied with russia. hitler didnt give a fuck about communism orthe russian people.


Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Matt C on July 04, 2011, 01:14:09 PM
can a communist society avoid totalitarian rule?  it hasnt in the past but if it is to be true communism then it HAS to avoid it. communism is a system without a leader. marx never specified exactly how this should be done, but its clear its the way he wanted it.

the tyranny and oppression of the people who have seized power in countries that have tired communism is the evil, not communism itself.  and to prevent this evil one must not dismiss communism but make a modification to it that disallows the accumulation of power into the hands of one, or a few.

the soviet union did not start the war. germany did. any attempt to diminish hitlers role as the sole cause of ww2 is woefully ignorant. germany was not fighting against russia. they were fighting for themselves. remember, germany was allied with russia. hitler didnt give a fuck about communism orthe russian people.

But that's exactly the thing, communism in its theoretical terms has never been realized and I don't see any reason to hold out hope that it will be.  You say you are against power being accumulated in the hands of the few, but that is what the record of communism has seen.

As for the start of the war, it began when Britain and France declared war on Germany:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/september/3/newsid_3493000/3493279.stm

Germany had previously attempted to reclaim the historical Germanic territory of Danzig and I think if anything, Hitler wanted to declare a private war with Poland to that effect.  It was one of Hitler's political mistakes though, as such a show of power was bound to be met with international scrutiny.  With that said, Russia invaded Poland alongside Germany under the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, so if invading Poland was the cause of the war, wouldn't Russia be equally responsible for the war?  So how come Russia wasn't declared war on as well?

I guess what I'm trying to get at is that there was a lot of sin to go around in WWII and to put the blame squarely on one side is wrong.
Title: Re: MD Magazine
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on July 04, 2011, 01:16:32 PM
Matt C: Has pure capitalist system ever been realised?
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: w8m8 on July 04, 2011, 01:42:53 PM
can a communist society avoid totalitarian rule?  it hasnt in the past but if it is to be true communism then it HAS to avoid it. communism is a system without a leader. marx never specified exactly how this should be done, but its clear its the way he wanted it.

the tyranny and oppression of the people who have seized power in countries that have tired communism is the evil, not communism itself.  and to prevent this evil one must not dismiss communism but make a modification to it that disallows the accumulation of power into the hands of one, or a few.

the soviet union did not start the war. germany did. any attempt to diminish hitlers role as the sole cause of ww2 is woefully ignorant. germany was not fighting against russia. they were fighting for themselves. remember, germany was allied with russia. hitler didnt give a fuck about communism orthe russian people.

Christ dude.

Taylor, what do the following all have in common:

- Marx
- Trotsky
- Lenin
- Stalin's butchers (Kaganovich - starved 10 million Ukranians during the Holodomor)
- The bankers funding them (Jacob Schiff, The Warburgs et al)

Now tell us how many tens of millions these fuckers butchered in Russia? Indeed, Solzhenitsyn (http://www.google.nl/search?hl=nl&q=Solzhenitsyn&oq=Solzhenitsyn&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=22578l22578l0l1l1l0l0l0l0l0l0ll0) put the figure at sixty million white russian christians butchered/worked to death!

http://www.google.nl/search?hl=nl&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=Solzhenitsyn+sixty+million&btnG=Google+zoeken

All piss taking aside, Tay, ponder those nuggets and then ask yourself if maybe, just fucking maybe, that was one of the very real things responsible for rattling the German's cage!

As you have already betrayed, you know nothing of communism, much less the fact it was 99% jewish at it's executive levels.

You live a degenerate life, promoted to you by the same people we are discussing herein this thread; you don't care though, so no problems.

Next time you find yourself full of black cock, remember this is the man you are giving yourself to; not that you have any clue of his relevance:

(http://img7.imagebanana.com/img/fq741elf/taylorsuckscock.jpg)
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: tbombz on July 04, 2011, 02:13:58 PM
But that's exactly the thing, communism in its theoretical terms has never been realized and I don't see any reason to hold out hope that it will be.  You say you are against power being accumulated in the hands of the few, but that is what the record of communism has seen.

As for the start of the war, it began when Britain and France declared war on Germany:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/september/3/newsid_3493000/3493279.stm

Germany had previously attempted to reclaim the historical Germanic territory of Danzig and I think if anything, Hitler wanted to declare a private war with Poland to that effect.  It was one of Hitler's political mistakes though, as such a show of power was bound to be met with international scrutiny.  With that said, Russia invaded Poland alongside Germany under the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, so if invading Poland was the cause of the war, wouldn't Russia be equally responsible for the war?  So how come Russia wasn't declared war on as well?

I guess what I'm trying to get at is that there was a lot of sin to go around in WWII and to put the blame squarely on one side is wrong.

you understand that communism has never been actually tried

so stop bashin it and acting like its evil, and that capitalism is some grand miracle.

 communism isnt bad. it lead to the socialist uprising of the late 18th and early 19th century that is responsible for all the luxuries developed countries have today.

 without an idealistic workers philosophy (communism) to counter the classcial economics that was dominating the political spector, we could have never achieveed minumum wages, safe working conditions, 8 horu work days, etc etc.

as for ww2. you said we shouldnt put down germany without recognizing the evil germany was fihting. and you said that evbil was communism. no. germany was not fighting any evil. and the evil that was on the opposite side, the vil of russia, was not a communist evil but the vil of a few bad men who tookpower in a communist countries. their policies were not communist and germany was not fighting them fo4r those reasons anyways.

you were either obfuscating or just ignorant

Title: Re: MD Magazine
Post by: tbombz on July 04, 2011, 02:15:35 PM
neither pure communism nor pure capitalism is good. you need bits of each to create a system that allows for personal freedom and collective prosperity while at the same time ensuring the responsible use of the planets resources.
Title: Re: MD Magazine
Post by: Matt C on July 04, 2011, 07:41:52 PM
Matt C: Has pure capitalist system ever been realised?

I suppose neither has been realized, at least for long periods of time.  Although history has examples of systems which are closer to "true capitalism" than "true communism".

In any true capitalist system, it would not be long before the largest corporations start pressuring government members to create regulations which impose costs on their competitors and allow them to maintain or attempt to create monopoly/oligopoly power.  Yes, it is corporations who want minimum wage and regulations because it hurts smaller competition.  For that reason, I honestly don't see a purist capitalist model lasting for long.  But in the fleeting instances we have seen it, it has worked well.  "True communism" is the equivalent of putting 10 naked women in a room with 100 horny men and assuming none of the women will be raped.  Then when this situation unfolds and all the women get raped people come back and say "But 'in theory' this wasn't supposed to happen!!  That's not the true intent of this social experiment!"

Well yeah, but intentions aside, it always happens that way so isn't it rational to learn from that and not put 10 naked women in a room with 100 horny men?  Likewise, we shouldn't create socioeconomic systems based on fantasies about egalitarianism and Boasian Anthropology.

you understand that communism has never been actually tried

so stop bashin it and acting like its evil, and that capitalism is some grand miracle.

 communism isnt bad. it lead to the socialist uprising of the late 18th and early 19th century that is responsible for all the luxuries developed countries have today.

 without an idealistic workers philosophy (communism) to counter the classcial economics that was dominating the political spector, we could have never achieveed minumum wages, safe working conditions, 8 horu work days, etc etc.

as for ww2. you said we shouldnt put down germany without recognizing the evil germany was fihting. and you said that evbil was communism. no. germany was not fighting any evil. and the evil that was on the opposite side, the vil of russia, was not a communist evil but the vil of a few bad men who tookpower in a communist countries. their policies were not communist and germany was not fighting them fo4r those reasons anyways.

you were either obfuscating or just ignorant



It is correct to state that what was observed in Soviet Russia was not "true communism", but it is what we see time and time again when the incentive system is shifted to favour policies which the USSR focused on.  And you are right that what was observed was the evil of a few bad men.  Men such as Lazar Kaganovich, Genrikh Yagoda, Leonid Reichman, Béla Kun and others.  These men murdered more people ever attributed to Hitler.

tbombz - if private property is abolished, what incentive would people have to take care of property?  Imagine if you were forced to bring homeless people into your home and share your belongings with them equally.  You may not think that is what communism would ultimately lead to but the reality is that there are seven billion people on the planet and a global GDP of $10,000 per year.  Thus anyone making more than that figure is receiving more than their "fair share" and would have to redistribute that wealth.

Yes, capitalism results in an uneven distribution of wealth, but it also creates a system where said wealth is created in the first place.  If the workers create Wal-Mart then why do they rely on the capital of the corporation to create the store?  They should be able to band together and create their own Wal-Mart.  How are big projects are undertaken?  By financing.  Investment requires saving.  Rich people have big savings and it would not be rational to part with those savings if they could not realize the benefits of doing so.  It would be better to spend the money vacationing or buying expensive gifts for family.  There is $65 trillion dollars in the global economy circulating annually.  My question is: What system will allow that money to go to the best use to create the most good?  Thus far I see no system which has produced a greater result than a predominantly free market oriented one.

neither pure communism nor pure capitalism is good. you need bits of each to create a system that allows for personal freedom and collective prosperity while at the same time ensuring the responsible use of the planets resources.

I would probably be inclined to agree that a bit of a mix is best, but from my vantage point, free markets have a great track record and should be a key component in any economy.
Title: Re: MD Magazine
Post by: tbombz on July 04, 2011, 08:32:47 PM
Arguing about wat would happen in a purely communistic society is futile. Besides, u obviously haven't read the philosophy behind it, because if you did u would know that in it's original form communism demanded all citizens to be productive.... And those who were not would not be given any share of societies resources.

Free markets are wonderful so long as there are restrictions and responsible usage of resources is required. Fair wages, good working conditions, environmental regulations on the production process, etc. All these things are socialist policies necessary to ensure that capitalism runs smoothly.


Classical economics and laizzes faire ideology relies on the idea that everything evens itself out in the long run. And in theory that's true. But as a wise man once said, in the long run were all dead.
Title: Re: MD Magazine
Post by: Matt C on July 04, 2011, 09:27:00 PM
Arguing about wat would happen in a purely communistic society is futile. Besides, u obviously haven't read the philosophy behind it, because if you did u would know that in it's original form communism demanded all citizens to be productive.... And those who were not would not be given any share of societies resources.

Free markets are wonderful so long as there are restrictions and responsible usage of resources is required. Fair wages, good working conditions, environmental regulations on the production process, etc. All these things are socialist policies necessary to ensure that capitalism runs smoothly.


Classical economics and laizzes faire ideology relies on the idea that everything evens itself out in the long run. And in theory that's true. But as a wise man once said, in the long run were all dead.

The philosophy behind communism sounds pleasant, I am just saying that it never works out that way, or at least has not yet.

As for fair wages, the costs of wages are ultimately passed on to the consumers therefore the better the minimum wage, the higher the cost of goods.  It does not do much to have a high minimum wage if the extra money is simply spent on the higher costs of goods.  Increased productivity is the only way to increase wages in real terms and free markets have proven to be very efficient in doing so.  Free markets have created some of the most prosperous societies in the world.
Title: Re: MD Magazine
Post by: tbombz on July 05, 2011, 10:06:40 PM
The philosophy behind communism sounds pleasant, I am just saying that it never works out that way, or at least has not yet.

As for fair wages, the costs of wages are ultimately passed on to the consumers therefore the better the minimum wage, the higher the cost of goods.  It does not do much to have a high minimum wage if the extra money is simply spent on the higher costs of goods.  Increased productivity is the only way to increase wages in real terms and free markets have proven to be very efficient in doing so.  Free markets have created some of the most prosperous societies in the world.

true but your only arguing for more legislation (against price hikes in response to min. wages) and going further from capitalism and closer to communism.

Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: Wiggs on July 05, 2011, 10:47:47 PM
Your mother's pussy felt like a rolled up newspaper full of cold oatmeal.

lmao!
Title: Re: Why In The Movies Are Minority Women Always In Postions Of Authority?
Post by: dyslexic on July 05, 2011, 11:24:55 PM
Your mother's pussy felt like a rolled up newspaper full of cold oatmeal.


Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... heh heh... uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh....


Have you felt this thing you compared some time in the past? Don't say with my mother. She hated oats.