Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Parker on August 16, 2011, 05:34:40 PM
-
In that order
[/youtube]
-
Amazing.. none of today's pros look anything like this..
-
Jesus Christ they all look amazing.
-
incredible all 5 ,,,
-
Now Thats Bodybuilding....
-
Notice their faces---they lack that bloat found in today's competitors, and note the seperation of the muscles...
*also, Kevin can "speak", he's not liquored up. And notice how he does his signature pose, by bringing his shoulders fwd, which means he's not displaying his full width.
-
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_OwjlM7QTyok/R7rJf3wkxZI/AAAAAAAAAD0/3B-9Hy52tRI/s400/guestposerd26sl.jpg)
-
why is a bodybuilding video being posted on this forum?
-
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_OwjlM7QTyok/R7rJf3wkxZI/AAAAAAAAAD0/3B-9Hy52tRI/s400/guestposerd26sl.jpg)
this is an offseason pic and has nothing to do with this.
yes, notice the fully sunken cheeks and ripped jaw muscles. why the fuck cant they diet down like this now? the 90's was the pinnacle of bodybuilding.
-
Notice their faces---they lack that bloat found in today's competitors, and note the seperation of the muscles...
*also, Kevin can "speak", he's not liquored up. And notice how he does his signature pose, by bringing his shoulders fwd, which means he's not displaying his full width.
His face looks like a freaking anatomy exhibit. unreal
-
this is an offseason pic and has nothing to do with this.
(http://infinitesportsusa.com/athletes/images/6/BranchWarren.jpg)
-
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_OwjlM7QTyok/R7rJf3wkxZI/AAAAAAAAAD0/3B-9Hy52tRI/s400/guestposerd26sl.jpg)
Shit like this makes me miss Bob Paris.......(NO HOMO).
-
Ouch....you really get an idea on how mych bodybuilding has gone in the wrong direction.
-
Its all progress, all progress...
-
All of them looking great.
1996 Vince taylor was just amazing. 8)
-
Its all regression, all regression...
Fixed
-
Did somebody call Arnold 'Mr. Dianabol' on the intro? Lol
-
In that order
[/youtube]
Can't wait to see this on ESPN. ::) ::)........................ ......... WAIT............ WUT ?????????????????
-
Can't wait to see this on ESPN. ::) ::)........................ ......... WAIT............ WUT ?????????????????
Ha,ha you saw the ESPN didn't you?
-
Ha,ha you saw the ESPN didn't you?
Yes.
I always wonder why people say they can't wait to see this on ESPN... Bodybuilding has been aired on ESPN!!
Not anymore though.
I remember not too many years ago, some bb shows were showed on EuroSport also. Arnold Classic at least.
Why not anymore ???
-
Levrone was such a freak
-
todays guys have delts the size of, or larger than their heads, wolf, branch, jay
-
I wonder if in 15 years time we'll be looking back at the guys competing in this year's Olympia and saying "wow, that's the way bodybuilders should look".
The sad fact is, we probably will.
-
I wonder if in 15 years time we'll be looking back at the guys competing in this year's Olympia and saying "wow, that's the way bodybuilders should look".
The sad fact is, we probably will.
sadly that may be true, we'll be saying they looked better now...
-
nice touch to have arnold doing post contest interview of kevin on espn, that gives show a lot of status, arnold appeared genuinely into it, and kevin was presentable, used more than 1 syllable at a time, well spoken, charismatic, not easy when the guy is obviously tired, hungry, tense. $100k probably helps
"FAHNTAHSTIC!"
-
sadly that may be true, we'll be saying they looked better now...
Yep - things won't change - I remember back in 1996 when I was only just getting into bodybuilding the critics were talking about Dillett's gut, Dorian's gut, Nasser's gut, Fux's gut etc, and saying that bodybuilding was going downhill and reminiscing about how Zane and Bannout looked amazing in the early 80's (fifteen years previous) and that's how bodybuilding should be - now you've got guys like Branch Warren and even Jay and Kai with guts and bloat and people are now saying the same thign - it won't change - it's human nature to hark back to yesteryear and say how things were so much better.
-
Amazing.. none of today's pros look anything like this..
Rest of line-up not too shabby either!
6 Andreas Munzer Austria
7 Roland Cziurlok Germany
8 Porter Cottrell USA
9 Jean Pierre Fux Switzerland
10 Darrem Charles Trinidad
11 Gunter Schlierkamp Germany
12 Roland Kickinger
-
Yep - things won't change - I remember back in 1996 when I was only just getting into bodybuilding the critics were talking about Dillett's gut, Dorian's gut, Nasser's gut, Fux's gut etc, and saying that bodybuilding was going downhill and reminiscing about how Zane and Bannout looked amazing in the early 80's (fifteen years previous) and that's how bodybuilding should be - now you've got guys like Branch Warren and even Jay and Kai with guts and bloat and people are now saying the same thign - it won't change - it's human nature to hark back to yesteryear and say how things were so much better.
spot on post
-
Yep - things won't change - I remember back in 1996 when I was only just getting into bodybuilding the critics were talking about Dillett's gut, Dorian's gut, Nasser's gut, Fux's gut etc, and saying that bodybuilding was going downhill and reminiscing about how Zane and Bannout looked amazing in the early 80's (fifteen years previous) and that's how bodybuilding should be - now you've got guys like Branch Warren and even Jay and Kai with guts and bloat and people are now saying the same thign - it won't change - it's human nature to hark back to yesteryear and say how things were so much better.
Thing is that (the 90s) was when the guts started. If you have watched Flex's Mass Construction vid, you'll see him trying to control a massive gut. And Fux had a alien gut, with a hernia.
The best era for bbing and for bbing contracts was the 90s, bar none. Look, it was on ESPN, not now, and probably not ever.
-
Ouch....you really get an idea on how mych bodybuilding has gone in the wrong direction.
THIS
Did somebody call Arnold 'Mr. Dianabol' on the intro? Lol
Mr Dynamo
-
jp fux and badell , I remember then, thinking were pretty bad
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=80028.0;attach=85704;image)
(http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2fhKUuNDuks/0.jpg)
-
I wonder if in 15 years time we'll be looking back at the guys competing in this year's Olympia and saying "wow, that's the way bodybuilders should look".
The sad fact is, we probably will.
Nope, 15 yrs from now, everybody will use this as the era of crap---they will see where bbing started to drop like a rock...
FIgo, Fux's was the worst. Also, Dillett had one primarily during the offseason.
-
I recall even cotrell had a bit of a gut he found hard to control at times, when he got a bit bigger
as far back as vinny commerford, and tim belknap even, but no-one had a pregnant look like fux!
-
I recall even cotrell had a bit of a gut he found hard to control at times, when he got a bit bigger
as far back as vinny commerford, and tim belknap even, but no-one had a pregnant look like fux!
I remember the one shot where he had a hernia plus the gut, it look like something was coming out of his bellybutton...and he had abs at the same time! Shit was nasty
Also, why is Johnnie Morant regarded as having big ass chest? All the pics I have seen of him, so a great chest, but not something to be regarded as legendary.
-
In that order
[/youtube]
thought flex won this one.
guys look beautiful (no homo).
-
That was the year Shaun Ray wore a wig on stage.
THE BEEF
-
Yep - things won't change - I remember back in 1996 when I was only just getting into bodybuilding the critics were talking about Dillett's gut, Dorian's gut, Nasser's gut, Fux's gut etc, and saying that bodybuilding was going downhill and reminiscing about how Zane and Bannout looked amazing in the early 80's (fifteen years previous) and that's how bodybuilding should be - now you've got guys like Branch Warren and even Jay and Kai with guts and bloat and people are now saying the same thign - it won't change - it's human nature to hark back to yesteryear and say how things were so much better.
Are you kidding. Its easy to comprehend. All of the guys in the vid look great, todays guys look like bloated, puffed out trainwrecks.
I don't think everybodys ideal of what looks impressive is going to change to Branch Warren in a decade.
For the record neither Dorian, Ronnie, Fux are in this vid and they did all take it too far. Vince, ray, Kev were always balanced and trim, flex hadn't fucked himself yet and paul looks the worst to be honest.
-
All these guys look incredible. Damn insulin for ruining bodybuilding. Any one of the top 5 here would win the O today hands down.
-
thought flex won this one.
guys look beautiful (no homo).
Yes, Flex did win this show. Kevin looked great, but Flex was the clear winner. FYI, I watched this broadcast on ESPN LOL!!
-
Yes, Flex did win this show. Kevin looked great, but Flex was the clear winner. FYI, I watched this broadcast on ESPN LOL!!
they all looked fucking great
couldve gone either way, but I also edged it to flex
-
I miss those days, you were actually inspired to look like them, not like the today's monstrosities.
-
That was the year Shaun Ray wore a wig on stage.
THE BEEF
is that really a wig?
-
jp fux and badell , I remember then, thinking were pretty bad
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=80028.0;attach=85704;image)
(http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2fhKUuNDuks/0.jpg)
hahhahahaha.......both Men were noticibly Pregnant in this photo......I wonder what they called their kids
-
I remember that flex mag hardcore workout with the daisy dukes, sunglasses and work boots
thing is, fux didnt have a gut and was huge already when he turned pro and as a rookie, then for some unecessary size he fucked up his midsection
-
I miss those days, you were actually inspired to look like them, not like the today's monstrosities.
That's the whole point, really.
If people no longer want to look like the competitors, bodybuilding will slowly starve itself of appeal.
This is what happens when judges reward what is 'awesome' rather than what is 'inspirational.'
-
Now thats a contest. :o
Vince Taylor was wayyyyyyy underrated in my opinion.
-
Would have been an even better lineup if NASSER was there :) He didnt do the 96 AC but did the next three years - 97, 98 and 99, placing 2nd in two of them and 1st in one of them, beating most of the names in the video in the three subsequent shows.
(http://muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=40291&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)
-
they all looked awesome,the 90s was the best decade for pro-bodybuilding!
-
Would have been an even better lineup if NASSER was there :) He didnt do the 96 AC but did the next three years - 97, 98 and 99, placing 2nd in two of them and 1st in one of them, beating most of the names in the video in the three subsequent shows.
(http://muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=40291&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)
Can you please leave your boyfriend Nasser out of it? Damn, you always have to bring him up if he wasn't there. And we don't know the outcome. It was a toss up that yr between Kev and Flex, Kev was on point...Nasser hadn't developed good enough back detail to deal with a on point Kev. 97 Kev didn't really care too much about the Arnold.
-
FAAAAAAAAAAWK paul is a monster :o :o :o :o :o
-
FAAAAAAAAAAWK paul is a monster :o :o :o :o :o
Until he has to stand next to Nasser :)
-
^ odd you post that pic paul looks much bigger to me
-
^ odd you post that pic paul looks much bigger to me
Paul is taller yes but Nasser is much thicker and more muscular. Dillet's pecs and lats look almost non-existent next to Nasser's
-
Until he has to stand next to Nasser :)
Again, why do you ALWAYS include Nasser in almost every thread that doesn't have him? Look stop Pimpin' him.
-
Nasser more muscular than Paul haha so are you Nasser's son? Thicker = meaningless in bodybuilding, Franco Columbo was thicker than Arnold, but was 10x worse bodybuilder. Branch Warren = thick, again it means nothing. Nasser = huge gut and torso, narrow, shitty overall structure and muscle shape
-
Nasser more muscular than Paul haha so are you Nasser's son? Thicker = meaningless in bodybuilding, Franco Columbo was thicker than Arnold, but was 10x worse bodybuilder. Branch Warren = thick, again it means nothing. Nasser = huge gut and torso, narrow, shitty overall structure and muscle shape
you're kidding right?
-
(http://muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=35301&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)
Nasser's structure is just inferior, can't hold enough mass that isn't insulin or oil
-
you're kidding right?
What happened to Nasser's back/rear delts? Disappeared in comparison to his hams/gut
-
Nasser more muscular than Paul haha so are you Nasser's son? Thicker = meaningless in bodybuilding, Franco Columbo was thicker than Arnold, but was 10x worse bodybuilder. Branch Warren = thick, again it means nothing. Nasser = huge gut and torso, narrow, shitty overall structure and muscle shape
wtf Nasser worse structure and shape than Dillet? Nasser consistently beat Paul during his prime in tons of shows, wasn't even close.
-
(http://muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=35301&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)
Nasser's structure is just inferior, can't hold enough mass that isn't insulin or oil
Desperation = "conveniently" choosing a picture from 94 before Nasser blew up. 94 Nasser vs. 95 - 99 = night and day difference.
-
wtf Nasser worse structure and shape than Dillet? Nasser consistently beat Paul during his prime in tons of shows, wasn't even close.
yeh lets take IFBB judging as gospel they havent been wrong tons of times before..
-
Desperation = "conveniently" choosing a picture from 94 before Nasser blew up. 94 Nasser vs. 95 - 99 = night and day difference.
It's not like all the oil or insulin made him look better
-
It's not like all the oil or insulin made him look better
It's obvious you're just trolling now. You had me going for a few posts though as I did take you seroiusly enough to reply to lol.
-
Ok man just tell urself im trolling i dont care. Also, someone with arms as inferior as Nassers should never have been able to win a BBing competition in the 90s with how many complete physiques were out there
-
try to follow this logic bigbobs
know how much better kevin levrone and flex wheeler in 1996 were than any Nasser physique? Well this is how much bigger and wider Paul was than them both in 1996. Ergo, Pauls best was much, much better than anything Nasser could ever hope for
1996 AC
(http://forum.bodybuilding.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3288861&stc=1&d=1303526838)
-
paul dillet had a much better "stage presence" than nasser, nasser may have had him on some bodyparts, but overall, paul's look was superior
-
Desperation = "conveniently" choosing a picture from 94 before Nasser blew up. 94 Nasser vs. 95 - 99 = night and day difference.
And it was also before Dillett blew up...and stop making this a Nasser vs____ thread.
Nasser, this, Nasser that. Everybody know that you have a hardon for him, even your wife. Just come out of the closet already
-
And it was also before Dillett blew up...and stop making this a Nasser vs____ thread.
Nasser, this, Nasser that. Everybody know that you have a hardon for him, even your wife. Just come out of the closet already
Hahaha.
-
try to follow this logic bigbobs
know how much better kevin levrone and flex wheeler in 1996 were than any Nasser physique? Well this is how much bigger and wider Paul was than them both in 1996. Ergo, Pauls best was much, much better than anything Nasser could ever hope for
logic is showing a screencap of Paul vs. other bodybuilders (who were also smaller next to Nasser) and then saying therefore Paul must look bigger than Nasser too? All that despite the fact that I've posted a comparison above and here's another of the two standing together? I was actually giving you benefit of the doubt by concluding that you were just trolling
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=179021.0;attach=208413;image)
And btw both Kevin and Flex lost to Nasser just months later at the Olympia the same year (Paul too I believe or did he skip that show?) yet you're stating it as fact that their 96 look was better than any year of Nasser. Reasons like that are why I find it hard to believe you're not trolling.
-
paul dillet had a much better "stage presence" than nasser, nasser may have had him on some bodyparts, but overall, paul's look was superior
::)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=357082.0;attach=392370;image)
-
Bigger isn't always better...Nasser had a decided mass advantage on Flex, Shawn and Kevin....yet was routinely owned by them because they had vastly superior physiques.
Also they didn't make FOOLS out of themselves by going onstage with horridly obvious synthol enhancements like bighead did
-
Bigger isn't always better...Nasser had a decided mass advantage on Flex, Shawn and Kevin....yet was routinely owned by them because they had vastly superior physiques.
Also they didn't make FOOLS out of themselves by going onstage with horridly obvious synthol enhancements like bighead did
From 95 to 99 (during Nasser's prime years) he actually routinely owned Shawn and Kevin - beat them more times than he lost to them. With Wheeler, Nasser placed higher in 96/97, then they placed wheeler higher in 97/98.
One can argue that contest placings are not the end all (I often argue this too), but then I support my opinions with comparison pics. The guys in this thread however are going against both comparison picture evidence and contest results to say Dillet was better.
-
From 95 to 99 (during Nasser's prime years) he actually routinely owned Shawn and Kevin - beat them more times than he lost to them. With Wheeler, Nasser placed higher in 96/97, then they placed wheeler higher in 97/98.
One can argue that contest placings are not the end all (I often argue this too), but then I support my opinions with comparison pics. The guys in this thread however are going against both comparison picture evidence and contest results to say Dillet was better.
From 95 to 99 (during Nasser's prime years) he actually routinely owned Shawn and Kevin - beat them more times than he lost to them.
Wrong as usual ( think before you type. ) from 1995-1999 when directly competing against Nasser , Kevin beat him 17 times to Nasser's 10 returning the favor
1995 Kevin beat Nasser 5 times
1996 Nasser beat Kevin 6 times
1997 Kevin beat Nasser 7 times and Nasser beat him 2
1998 Kevin beat Nasser 2 times and Nasser beat him 1
1999 Kevin beat Nasser 3 times and Nasser beat him 1
You didn't learn your lesson the last time you tried to compare Kevin to Nasser? Over the course of both their ENTIRE careers directly comparing Nasser to Kevin it gets worse for Nasser
Now Shawn is another story because Shawn rarely ventured out of the Olympia however
1995 Nasser beat Shawn 1 time
1996 Nasser failed the diuretics test however lets entertain he didn't lose his spot he competed and lost to Shawn
1997 Nasser beat Shawn 1 time
1998 Nasser beat Shawn 1 time
1999 Shawn beat Nasser 1 time
So sticking to your limited time-line ( which you only used to try and serve your slanted purposes ) Nasser only beat Shawn one time more than Shawn beat him in his ' prime years '
Now contest placements are the end-be-all in deciding who is the better WHEN THEY ARE DIRECTLY COMPARED TO EACH OTHER this is just another case of you trying to turn Nasser into something more than what he was and some feeble attempt at bending their careers to fit your point of view ( lame )
How many times did Shawn beat Nasser through out their careers when directly compared to each other?
From 1994 to 2001 Shawn faced Nasser 8 times and Shawn beat him 5 of those 8 with Nasser winning just 3 times , so Shawn is a better bodybuilder than Nasser , and not in some ' prime years ' nonsense , as a whole when all things are considered
Now Nasser compared to Dillett , there really is no room to play with , Nasser was just better competitive bodybuilder when directly compared to him , no one can really say other wise , they can harp on aesthetics , structure but facts are facts and the fact is while Nasser was better than Paul , he wasn't in Shawn's , Flex's or Kevin's league no matter how you try and slant it so.
-
From 95 to 99 (during Nasser's prime years) he actually routinely owned Shawn and Kevin - beat them more times than he lost to them.
Wrong as usual ( think before you type. ) from 1995-1999 when directly competing against Nasser , Kevin beat him 17 times to Nasser's 10 returning the favor
1995 Kevin beat Nasser 5 times
1996 Nasser beat Kevin 6 times
1997 Kevin beat Nasser 7 times and Nasser beat him 2
1998 Kevin beat Nasser 2 times and Nasser beat him 1
1999 Kevin beat Nasser 3 times and Nasser beat him 1
You didn't learn your lesson the last time you tried to compare Kevin to Nasser? Over the course of both their ENTIRE careers directly comparing Nasser to Kevin it gets worse for Nasser
Now Shawn is another story because Shawn rarely ventured out of the Olympia however
1995 Nasser beat Shawn 1 time
1996 Nasser failed the diuretics test however lets entertain he didn't lose his spot he competed and lost to Shawn
1997 Nasser beat Shawn 1 time
1998 Nasser beat Shawn 1 time
1999 Shawn beat Nasser 1 time
So sticking to your limited time-line ( which you only used to try and serve your slanted purposes ) Nasser only beat Shawn one time more than Shawn beat him in his ' prime years '
Now contest placements are the end-be-all in deciding who is the better WHEN THEY ARE DIRECTLY COMPARED TO EACH OTHER this is just another case of you trying to turn Nasser into something more than what he was and some feeble attempt at bending their careers to fit your point of view ( lame )
How many times did Shawn beat Nasser through out their careers when directly compared to each other?
From 1994 to 2001 Shawn faced Nasser 8 times and Shawn beat him 5 of those 8 with Nasser winning just 3 times , so Shawn is a better bodybuilder than Nasser , and not in some ' prime years ' nonsense , as a whole when all things are considered
Now Nasser compared to Dillett , there really is no room to play with , Nasser was just better competitive bodybuilder when directly compared to him , no one can really say other wise , they can harp on aesthetics , structure but facts are facts and the fact is while Nasser was better than Paul , he wasn't in Shawn's , Flex's or Kevin's league no matter how you try and slant it so.
LOL not going to argue in detail with you on all of your aboe because we have over the years in various threads and there's nothing new to be said, but I'll summarize some of your flaws here:
You selective pick certain statistics and leave out qualititative factors. For example ignoring the fact that in several of the shows during which the names above lost to Nasser the discrepency in placings was huge (ex. Shawn, Kevin and Flex each had placings well out of the top 5 whereas Nasser did not from 95 to the 99 AC).
Your stats also give equal weighting to shows at the end of one's career, so if one continues to compete past their prime your stats make them into a worse bodybuilder when in actuality that does not change anything (for example Ronnie can continue competing until he's 60 and never place well but that doesn't take anything away from him).
Also not too long ago you did post that Nasser was more sucessful than Shawn since Shawn only had (two?) pro victories vs. Nasser's 6. Now in this post you're saying nasser is not in Shawn's league lol - so a more succesful bodybuilder is not in the less succesful bodybuilder's league lol.
So sometimes your measure is # of pro victories, other times it's who beat who how often (while ignoring the gap between placings so a 2nd vs. 3rd placing counts the same as a 3rd vs. 8th).
Also above you're completely ignoring Nasser's 96 Olympia placing over Kevin while still mentioning Nasser's 96 placing against Shawn. Like I said numerous biases and selective statistics.
I know you'll send another lengthy meltdown reply (you have the time and energy to do so almost daily for years with Hulkster lol)
-
^^^ Another example that just came to mind is how when trying to argue for Mike Francois you conveniently use the statistic of # of wins / number of shows competed in - since he did not compete in many shows before his injury, while ignoring stats such as # of pro wins in total, # of 2nd or 3rd placings, etc. The latter stats you use if/when it helps support the "athlete" you are biased towards.
-
What happened to Nasser's back/rear delts? Disappeared in comparison to his hams/gut
holy shit nasser is on so much slin in this video lollllll... i wonder how many ius
-
LOL at Bobs valiantly defending Nasser...He really thinks bighead is better than Kevin, Flex or Shawn....HAHAHAAAAA ....you make yourself look silly Bobs....he wasn't that good, no matter how hard you argue the point.
"Lets compare them from 95 to 99...when Nasser was in his prime"...LOL.....how about we take it one step further and only count the shows Nasser won....would that work for you? ::)
Nobody twisted his arm to get onstage looking like a bag of dog shit that was eaten by a donkey...shit out onto the road and ran over by a golf cart
-
LOL at Bobs valiantly defending Nasser...He really thinks bighead is better than Kevin, Flex or Shawn....HAHAHAAAAA ....you make yourself look silly Bobs....he wasn't that good, no matter how hard you argue the point.
"Lets compare them from 95 to 99...when Nasser was in his prime"...LOL.....how about we take it one step further and only count the shows Nasser won....would that work for you? ::)
Why not compare bodybuilders when they are amateurs then, or how about before they even start working out? ...if its considered normal to use the last few shows during semi-retirement? Obviously eveyone uses the peak years when comparing, however in Nasser's case haters like you focus their attention on other years since its hard to debate against him during his peak years.
-
LOL not going to argue in detail with you on all of your aboe because we have over the years in various threads and there's nothing new to be said, but I'll summarize some of your flaws here:
You selective pick certain statistics and leave out qualititative factors. For example ignoring the fact that in several of the shows during which the names above lost to Nasser the discrepency in placings was huge (ex. Shawn, Kevin and Flex each had placings well out of the top 5 whereas Nasser did not from 95 to the 99 AC).
Your stats also give equal weighting to shows at the end of one's career, so if one continues to compete past their prime your stats make them into a worse bodybuilder when in actuality that does not change anything (for example Ronnie can continue competing until he's 60 and never place well but that doesn't take anything away from him).
Also not too long ago you did post that Nasser was more sucessful than Shawn since Shawn only had (two?) pro victories vs. Nasser's 6. Now in this post you're saying nasser is not in Shawn's league lol - so a more succesful bodybuilder is not in the less succesful bodybuilder's league lol.
So sometimes your measure is # of pro victories, other times it's who beat who how often (while ignoring the gap between placings so a 2nd vs. 3rd placing counts the same as a 3rd vs. 8th).
Also above you're completely ignoring Nasser's 96 Olympia placing over Kevin while still mentioning Nasser's 96 placing against Shawn. Like I said numerous biases and selective statistics.
I know you'll send another lengthy meltdown reply (you have the time and energy to do so almost daily for years with Hulkster lol)
LOL not going to argue in detail with you on all of your aboe because we have over the years in various threads and there's nothing new to be said, but I'll summarize some of your flaws here:
You CAN NOT argue with me in detail , you have absolutely nothing to work with. You outright lied and hoped no one would call you on it.
You selective pick certain statistics and leave out qualititative factors. For example ignoring the fact that in several of the shows during which the names above lost to Nasser the discrepency in placings was huge (ex. Shawn, Kevin and Flex each had placings well out of the top 5 whereas Nasser did not from 95 to the 99 AC).
You picked certain factors that favored Nasser ( his ' peak years ' ) yet you're gonna say I'm not looking at the entire picture? add hypocrite to liar.
Your stats also give equal weighting to shows at the end of one's career, so if one continues to compete past their prime your stats make them into a worse bodybuilder when in actuality that does not change anything (for example Ronnie can continue competing until he's 60 and never place well but that doesn't take anything away from him).
My ' stats ' are THE stats , competitions over the entire course of their careers , you only wanna count the pluses while ignoring the minuses , not how it works and even counting the pluses you lied so you failed twice
Also not too long ago you did post that Nasser was more sucessful than Shawn since Shawn only had (two?) pro victories vs. Nasser's 6. Now in this post you're saying nasser is not in Shawn's league lol - so a more succesful bodybuilder is not in the less succesful bodybuilder's league lol.
Absolutely , Nasser was a more successful competitive bodybuilder than Shawn , but when directly compared to him he most of the time came up on the short end if the stick , facts-are-facts , Shawn never tried to enter as many contests as Nasser perhaps if he never put all his eggs in one basket he may have been more successful but it doesn't change the fact he owned Nasser regularly
So sometimes your measure is # of pro victories, other times it's who beat who how often (while ignoring the gap between placings so a 2nd vs. 3rd placing counts the same as a 3rd vs. 8th).
Shawn and Kevin rarely placed below 5th place the discrepancy is straws you're grasping at , a win is a win is a win and Kevin and Shawn won more contests when directly compared to Nasser , facts are facts
Also above you're completely ignoring Nasser's 96 Olympia placing over Kevin while still mentioning Nasser's 96 placing against Shawn. Like I said numerous biases and selective statistics.
No I mentioned ' if ' we counted Nasser place in the contest in 1996 , and if we did he would have beaten Kevin and still have lost to Shawn , I don't need either stat because they both still beat Nasser more than he beat them , contrary to your lie.
I know you'll send another lengthy meltdown reply (you have the time and energy to do so almost daily for years with Hulkster lol)
Meltdown? go learn what a meltdown is , because that it was not , just me pointing out once again you lied and Nasser was not and is not in Kevin , Shawn , or Flexes league and Nasser is no where near as good as you fluff him up to be
If you were factual and didn't lie about Nasser beating them more times than they beat him , I wouldn't have ever posted if you noticed I also pointed out the fact that Nasser was better than Dillett , I stick to facts and don't need to bend them or lie to fit my position.
-
^^^ Another example that just came to mind is how when trying to argue for Mike Francois you conveniently use the statistic of # of wins / number of shows competed in - since he did not compete in many shows before his injury, while ignoring stats such as # of pro wins in total, # of 2nd or 3rd placings, etc. The latter stats you use if/when it helps support the "athlete" you are biased towards.
Look there are other factors for sure but when all is said and done , when Nasser directly faced Kevin and Shawn , he wasn't as good it's a fact that can't be argued , try as you may , you're reduced to lying and using only Nasser's prime years and you still failed
-
Why not compare bodybuilders when they are amateurs then, or how about before they even start working out? ...if its considered normal to use the last few shows during semi-retirement? Obviously eveyone uses the peak years when comparing, however in Nasser's case haters like you focus their attention on other years since its hard to debate against him during his peak years.
It was actually you who said compared to Shawn & Kevin , lets compared them as professionals all vying for the same contest and see who came up the winner , we all know that it wasn't Nasser the majority of the time
and I just used your own criteria and still proved you dead wrong , his prime years 1995-1999 he was DESTROYED by Kevin and he onloy beat Shawn once more than Shawn beat him and that's because Shawn didn't compete that often !! it may have very well been more just based off of that , Bobs you're not working with anything
-
Robbery ,Flex looked 10x better than Kevin.
-
Robbery ,Flex looked 10x better than Kevin.
Yep. Kevin wanted to come in as heavy as Dorian from 93 until 97, but never could. Dorian dominated the 95 Olympia so much that Kevin tried playing the size game for years after that, to try and outmuscle Doz and later, Ronnie. All he should've done is come in as sharp as he could. He looked his best in the mid 240s, while Doz looked better in the mid 260s (the arm apart).
So much for genetics not playing a role. Why else couldn't KLo be as big as Ronnie or Dorian, even though he juiced as much as them and trained just as heavy (heavier than Dorian in some lifts, probably)?
-
Yep. Kevin wanted to come in as heavy as Dorian from 93 until 97, but never could. Dorian dominated the 95 Olympia so much that Kevin tried playing the size game for years after that, to try and outmuscle Doz and later, Ronnie. All he should've done is come in as sharp as he could. He looked his best in the mid 240s, while Doz looked better in the mid 260s (the arm apart).
So much so for genetics not playing a role. Why else couldn't KLo be as big as Ronnie or Dorian, even though he juiced as much as them and trained just as heavy (heavier than Dorian in some lifts, probably)?
Like they always said you got two Kevin's the lighter sharp as fuck one and the heavy soft as fuck one , he couldn't master the combo of size and conditioning. Like Shawn Ray said about Kevin , he was a rock star impersonating a bodybuilder , meaning Kevin was to distracted with other things to be fully focused and highly disciplined that he needed to be to beat the best of the best , I mean Kevin was less than 100% and still is only behind Ronnie in most pro wins , that says a lot.
-
Like they always said you got two Kevin's the lighter sharp as fuck one and the heavy soft as fuck one , he couldn't master the combo of size and conditioning. Like Shawn Ray said about Kevin , he was a rock star impersonating a bodybuilder , meaning Kevin was to distracted with other things to be fully focused and highly disciplined that he needed to be to beat the best of the best , I mean Kevin was less than 100% and still is only behind Ronnie in most pro wins , that says a lot.
Agreed. If Kevin & Flex had been focused like Dorian or Ronnie with the latters' work ethic, they'd have won a whole bunch of Sandows between them. Goes to show you can't skate to the very top on your genetics alone, without putting in the work.
-
Agreed. If Kevin & Flex had been focused like Dorian or Ronnie with the latters' work ethic, they'd have won a whole bunch of Sandows between them. Goes to show you can't skate to the very top on your genetics alone, without putting in the work.
I disagree, Shawn ,Kevin and Flex still looked better than Ronnie and Dorian but the judge criteria changed back then (size , freakiness and condition over shape,symmetry and proportions ) that's why nowadays we have guys like Branch Warren winning the Arnold ::).
-
I disagree, Shawn ,Kevin and Flex still looked better than Ronnie and Dorian but the judge criteria changed back then (size , freakiness and condition over shape,symmetry and proportions ) that's why nowadays we have guys like Branch Warren winning the Arnold ::).
Not saying Dorian and Ronnie looked better, just that they almost always came in shape (Dorian more than Ronnie) and stayed focused, as opposed to Kevin and Flex.
Shawn also had a great work ethic, at least as far as you can tell.
-
I disagree, Shawn ,Kevin and Flex still looked better than Ronnie and Dorian but the judge criteria changed back then (size , freakiness and condition over shape,symmetry and proportions ) that's why nowadays we have guys like Branch Warren winning the Arnold ::).
I tend to agree with this.
Coleman looked terrible after his first few Olympia wins. By the end, he looked like a bloated mess but the judges seemed to value his shoulder-width (I suppose) and he kept getting the nod.
Still, it's clear that Wheeler and Levrone would have looked better if they had the work ethic that is usually associated with Dorian and Ronnie.
-
Shawn also had a great work ethic, at least as far as you can tell.
Whatever else can be said about him, nobody can make the claim that Shawn Ray destroyed his physique.
That's impressive when in this day and age, most bodybuilders become bloated messes once they become 'professionals.'
-
From 95 to 99 (during Nasser's prime years) he actually routinely owned Shawn and Kevin - beat them more times than he lost to them.
Wrong as usual ( think before you type. ) from 1995-1999 when directly competing against Nasser , Kevin beat him 17 times to Nasser's 10 returning the favor
1995 Kevin beat Nasser 5 times
1996 Nasser beat Kevin 6 times
1997 Kevin beat Nasser 7 times and Nasser beat him 2
1998 Kevin beat Nasser 2 times and Nasser beat him 1
1999 Kevin beat Nasser 3 times and Nasser beat him 1
You didn't learn your lesson the last time you tried to compare Kevin to Nasser? Over the course of both their ENTIRE careers directly comparing Nasser to Kevin it gets worse for Nasser
Now Shawn is another story because Shawn rarely ventured out of the Olympia however
1995 Nasser beat Shawn 1 time
1996 Nasser failed the diuretics test however lets entertain he didn't lose his spot he competed and lost to Shawn
1997 Nasser beat Shawn 1 time
1998 Nasser beat Shawn 1 time
1999 Shawn beat Nasser 1 time
So sticking to your limited time-line ( which you only used to try and serve your slanted purposes ) Nasser only beat Shawn one time more than Shawn beat him in his ' prime years '
Now contest placements are the end-be-all in deciding who is the better WHEN THEY ARE DIRECTLY COMPARED TO EACH OTHER this is just another case of you trying to turn Nasser into something more than what he was and some feeble attempt at bending their careers to fit your point of view ( lame )
How many times did Shawn beat Nasser through out their careers when directly compared to each other?
From 1994 to 2001 Shawn faced Nasser 8 times and Shawn beat him 5 of those 8 with Nasser winning just 3 times , so Shawn is a better bodybuilder than Nasser , and not in some ' prime years ' nonsense , as a whole when all things are considered
Now Nasser compared to Dillett , there really is no room to play with , Nasser was just better competitive bodybuilder when directly compared to him , no one can really say other wise , they can harp on aesthetics , structure but facts are facts and the fact is while Nasser was better than Paul , he wasn't in Shawn's , Flex's or Kevin's league no matter how you try and slant it so.
Hahaha - holy shit how long do you spend time researching your answers to this stuff?! :o
Not hating - you've got to be one of the best debaters of physiques on here. 8)
-
Hahaha - holy shit how long do you spend time researching your answers to this stuff?! :o
Not hating - you've got to be one of the best debaters of physiques on here. 8)
About 10 minutes ;D
-
it's all opinion and speculation. the judges are routinely retarded, anyone who thinks otherwise is routinely retarded. just pick a favorite and argue. there are no wrong answers.
-
the judges are routinely retarded...
Anyone who rewards melting sauropods is a retard.
That's the only fact in bodybuilding.
-
i feel this was Mr. Levrone's best win because he completely LevrOWNED an awesome lineup with very high quality physiques
E
-
I find this awesome and heartbreaking for Flex. Two yrs after breaking his neck, he comes in Second at the Arnold twice in a row. Once to either or decision to Mike Francois, and once to rival Kevin Levrone...I think the 95 version was better, yet could have been sharper, had he brought that to the 96 Arnold, he would have won...
They all looked great, but if you look at them standing, they all had some sort of "thickness-bloat" about them. Was it the GH or the Insulin?
-
bigbobs is Nasser's little bitch by his own will. He actually enjoys it.
sad character.
-
bigbobs is Nasser's little bitch by his own will. He actually enjoys it.
sad character.
Somebody should notify his wife, so that she can do a intervention.