Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: andreisdaman on October 06, 2011, 01:55:12 PM
-
Wow...not sure if this has been posted yet but this guy really destroys FOX news during an interview...calls out FOX NEWS on all of its slanted news reporting and leaves the producer a stuttering mess....the producer tried to recover but then gets destroyed again....
FOX news used to be really good..I used to watch it religiously until they became so irresponsible in their reporting and began trying to slant the news to the point of actually making stuff up... it just became unbearable to watch......and this guy in the video sums it all up very articulately and succinctly
http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/10/occupy-wall-street-protester-lectures-fox-news-reporter-video.php
-
He didn't destroy anybody douchebag. ::)
-
LMFAO all talking points and bashing FOX maybe you can answer the question that no of them or anybody on this board has had the ability to do yet.
Why are they entitled to the money of the top 1%?
LMFAO at total nonsense like solyndra, do you even know what thats about?
if you did you wouldnt be saying the guy destroyed anyone...he made some good points about newscore but thats where it ended everythng outside of that was a self owning you moron.
-
;)
-
;)
Nyaaaa
Get that shit off here.
-
Nyaaaa
Get that shit off here.
Do you know why I posted that?
-
Who exactly is in control of the "living standard" getting worse. I make more now then I ever have. Regardless, how does a Justice department investigation help this guy. I love the nutbag leftiest talking points. No mention of Fast and Furious and I love the point how the Solyndra investigation is a waste of time. Nice hat douchbag.
-
Do you know why I posted that?
Andre likes his women men hairy?
-
Andre likes his women men hairy?
Check this out. Try to contain your laughter as much as possible.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=376813.50
-
Check this out. Try to contain your laughter as much as possible.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=376813.50
LMFAO. Aw fuck that's disgusting.
I gotta start checking out some of these other boards.
-
andreisdaman
Getbig V
Posts: 4269
Re: look at all this bush
« Reply #56 on: September 12, 2011, 06:18:41 AM » Quote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: Hulkster on September 11, 2011, 08:08:18 PM
agreed.
thats why I thank god every day that my girlfriend and soon to be wife has the most beautiful hairy pussy I have ever seen. and I have seen a lot of bush in my day ( well, mostly the computer monitor kind, but hey! ) LOL
it was grown back at my request back when we first met and she loves not having to shave it.
suits me fine!!
agreed...I even hate it that women shave their armpits..I always thought it was sexy..when I was a kid, women didn't shave their underarms either
________________________ ___________________
LMFAO!!!!
Andres' best post ever.
-
He didn't destroy anybody douchebag. ::)
of course he did..did you actually watch the video...?..that was total annihilation
-
LMFAO all talking points and bashing FOX maybe you can answer the question that no of them or anybody on this board has had the ability to do yet.
Why are they entitled to the money of the top 1%?
LMFAO at total nonsense like solyndra, do you even know what thats about?
if you did you wouldnt be saying the guy destroyed anyone...he made some good points about newscore but thats where it ended everythng outside of that was a self owning you moron.
response please
-
Andre - do you think Obama pissing away 535 Million to Solyndra is no big deal?
-
LMFAO all talking points and bashing FOX maybe you can answer the question that no of them or anybody on this board has had the ability to do yet.
Why are they entitled to the money of the top 1%?
LMFAO at total nonsense like solyndra, do you even know what thats about?
if you did you wouldnt be saying the guy destroyed anyone...he made some good points about newscore but thats where it ended everythng outside of that was a self owning you moron.
he's not entitled to the money of the top 1%.....but our society as a whole is....the rich should be admired and emulated but lets face it..all statistics say that they are undertaxed, have seen their earnings skyrocket while the rest of society has suffered major losses in this area and that they should be paying more
as for Solyndra, everyone knows that investing in solar and green energy is a crapshoot...I'm sure many solar companies and green companies have gone out of business over the years....its really not economically sound business model yet....
but the funny thing is, many people are complaining that the gov't is too dependent on oil, yet they get upset when the gov't throws money at solar companies in an attempt to get us off our addiction to oil....
YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS GUYS
-
of course he did..did you actually watch the video...?..that was total annihilation
I watched it. He didn't destroy anyone. Typical left-wing talking points.
-
Andre likes his women men hairy?
you should know..you're my bottom ;)
-
he's not entitled to the money of the top 1%.....but our society as a whole is....the rich should be admired and emulated but lets face it..all statistics say that they are undertaxed, have seen their earnings skyrocket while the rest of society has suffered major losses in this area and that they should be paying more
as for Solyndra, everyone knows that investing in solar and green energy is a crapshoot...I'm sure many solar companies and green companies have gone out of business over the years....its really not economically sound business model yet....
but the funny thing is, many people are complaining that the gov't is too dependent on oil, yet they get upset when the gov't throws money at solar companies in an attempt to get us off our addiction to oil....
YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS GUYS
lol why is the govt entitled to their money and not the money of the 50% that dont pay any federal income taxes?
the thing with solyndra is that they werent loan worthy as evidenced by the BUSH administration refusing to the them a loan b/c things didnt look right. you know that guy you love to bash?
obama knew this and gave them their loan anyway, why you ask? I wonder if that guy was a campaign donar? I wonder if that guy ever had dinner with obama?
you cant have it both ways andre....you obviously dont know anything about solyndra
-
Andre - do you think Obama pissing away 535 Million to Solyndra is no big deal?
of course it should be investigated.....thats a lot of money and there should be accountability, no doubt...but again you have to remember that solar and green companies are crapshoots because solar energy and research are very expensive...even green technology is expensive....
just look at the recycling industry....it is mostly a money-losing industry.....even though we have been trying to make it profitable for 20 years or so.....yet recycling is the right thing to do.....
look at the ethanol issue....ethanol is very expensive and needs massive subsidies......
again green technology is very expensive and just not profitable.....so its no surprise that Solyndra went out of business...many of these types of companies do and have been for years.....
its only an issue now due to politics
-
of course it should be investigated.....thats a lot of money and there should be accountability, no doubt...but again you have to remember that solar and green companies are crapshoots because solar energy and research are very expensive...even green technology is expensive....
just look at the recycling industry....it is mostly a money-losing industry.....even though we have been trying to make it profitable for 20 years or so.....yet recycling is the right thing to do.....
look at the ethanol issue....ethanol is very expensive and needs massive subsidies......
again green technology is very expensive and just not profitable.....so its no surprise that Solyndra went out of business...many of these types of companies do and have been for years.....
its only an issue now due to politics
Its about the corruption stupid!
-
lol why is the govt entitled to their money and not the money of the 50% that dont pay any federal income taxes?
the thing with solyndra is that they werent loan worthy as evidenced by the BUSH administration refusing to the them a loan b/c things didnt look right. you know that guy you love to bash?
obama knew this and gave them their loan anyway, why you ask? I wonder if that guy was a campaign donar? I wonder if that guy ever had dinner with obama?
you cant have it both ways andre....you obviously dont know anything about solyndra
well..first of all I have said many many times that I am and was a Bush SUPPORTER...you guys constantly try to paint me as left-wing to bash my arguments and points of view......Obama gave them the loan due to his philosophy that green technology needed to be explored..it fit into his agenda..doesn't make him guilty of wrong doing....if you want, you can say he made a bad decision....the gov't gives money to many companies that eventually go belly-up....but again..its all politics...just as BUSH was bashed for giving money to Blackwater who it turns out was guilty of lots of abuses....but I don't blame BUSH for all of that
-
I watched it. He didn't destroy anyone. Typical left-wing talking points.
of course he had liberal left-wing talking points...but his saying that FOX is biased and spreads propaganda was dead-on
-
well..first of all I have said many many times that I am and was a Bush SUPPORTER...you guys constantly try to paint me as left-wing to bash my arguments and points of view......Obama gave them the loan due to his philosophy that green technology needed to be explored..it fit into his agenda..doesn't make him guilty of wrong doing....if you want, you can say he made a bad decision....the gov't gives money to many companies that eventually go belly-up....but again..its all politics...just as BUSH was bashed for giving money to Blackwater who it turns out was guilty of lots of abuses....but I don't blame BUSH for all of that
No - he gave them the loan to help out his BILLIONAIRE bundler Kaiser
-
well..first of all I have said many many times that I am and was a Bush SUPPORTER...you guys constantly try to paint me as left-wing to bash my arguments and points of view......Obama gave them the loan due to his philosophy that green technology needed to be explored..it fit into his agenda..doesn't make him guilty of wrong doing....if you want, you can say he made a bad decision....the gov't gives money to many companies that eventually go belly-up....but again..its all politics...just as BUSH was bashed for giving money to Blackwater who it turns out was guilty of lots of abuses....but I don't blame BUSH for all of that
LOL bush felt that green tech needed to be explored as well just not with companies that were a bad bet like solyndra...again you discount the link between solyndra and obama. Bush's admin saw them as a bad bet, nothing changed other than the connection with the white house.
please answer the other part as well
lol why is the govt entitled to their money and not the money of the 50% that dont pay any federal income taxes?
-
Its about the corruption stupid!
believe me, there is bound to be some corruption in any business that receives over 500 million from the gov't....beleive me if the gov't gave me that kind of money my hand would be in the till as well....if there is corruption it should be investigated as I said and as a mater of fact, congress is on this as we speak..they have already brought in the execs from Solyndra to testify..
thats the first step..just ask Roger Clemons and Barry Bonds ;)
-
believe me, there is bound to be some corruption in any business that receives over 500 million from the gov't....beleive me if the gov't gave me that kind of money my hand would be in the till as well....if there is corruption it should be investigated as I said and as a mater of fact, congress is on this as we speak..they have already brought in the execs from Solyndra to testify..
thats the first step..just ask Roger Clemons and Barry Bonds ;)
He was warned not to do this by OMB!
-
of course he had liberal left-wing talking points...but his saying that FOX is biased and spreads propaganda was dead-on
How is him saying what a million other liberals have said destroying Fox News? It's a garden variety, rambling rant.
-
LOL bush felt that green tech needed to be explored as well just not with companies that were a bad bet like solyndra...again you discount the link between solyndra and obama. Bush's admin saw them as a bad bet, nothing changed other than the connection with the white house.
please answer the other part as well
well lets face it..we will never know if Obama gave them the money because of campaign contributions...and as I said it should be explored and investigated which congress is doing as we speak.....
As for your second point, we have argued over this before and I have always stated that EVERYONE including the elderly have to contribute to lowering the deficit....the poor should be taxed as is the rich.....but right now, the rich have the resources we can gain from right now.....and they are undertaxed.....and a significant amount of millionaires agree with Warren Buffet that this is the case.....many millionaires have benefitted from tax breaks and loopholes....now the gov't is asking them to give some of that back...I see nothing wrong with that at all
-
He was warned not to do this by OMB!
the president is warned not to do many things by many different people....HE makes the final decision..lets see how it plays out.....thats all I am saying..you guys immediately without any evidence whatsoever want to see criminality on Obama's part.....maybe that says something about you????
-
How is him saying what a million other liberals have said destroying Fox News? It's a garden variety, rambling rant.
okay so why didn't FOX air the interview????????
-
the president is warned not to do many things by many different people....HE makes the final decision..lets see how it plays out.....thats all I am saying..you guys immediately without any evidence whatsoever want to see criminality on Obama's part.....maybe that says something about you????
Are you freaking nuts? Bush admn canceled it because the company was on the way out, he gets shit load of cash and Kaiser spends 4 days in the WH in the first few weeks of Obama Admn, and it gets ok'd and you think thatslegit?
-
okay so why didn't FOX air the interview????????
Maybe a ranting lib wearing civil war hat was not good footage compared to other stuff they had?
-
Are you freaking nuts? Bush admn canceled it because the company was on the way out, he gets shit load of cash and Kaiser spends 4 days in the WH in the first few weeks of Obama Admn, and it gets ok'd and you think thatslegit?
what you are saying is not unusual in politics......if one guy doesn't give you something you go to the other guy who shares your ideology and you get it from him...again..many solar and green companies have gone out of business during Bush's and Obama's tenures.....if the Solyndra execs stole the money they should be held accountable
-
what you are saying is not unusual in politics......if one guy doesn't give you something you go to the other guy who shares your ideology and you get it from him...again..many solar and green companies have gone out of business during Bush's and Obama's tenures.....if the Solyndra execs stole the money they should be held accountable
no - obama needs to be held accountable for his corruption and incompetence.
-
Maybe a ranting lib wearing civil war hat was not good footage compared to other stuff they had?
just answer the question...does FOX news slant the news by using outright lies and deception???...even a flaming right wing Nazi like you has stated that FOX news is unwatchable
-
Hey Andre, wipe Obama's shit off your nose and take a deep breath, you pathetic douche bag. Society as a whole is entitled to someone's money? Fuck off to Cuba or Europe with that shit and enjoy their non-existent GDP growth and 70% tax rate. Oh wait, even they're bankrupt. ::)
-
well lets face it..we will never know if Obama gave them the money because of campaign contributions...and as I said it should be explored and investigated which congress is doing as we speak.....
As for your second point, we have argued over this before and I have always stated that EVERYONE including the elderly have to contribute to lowering the deficit....the poor should be taxed as is the rich.....but right now, the rich have the resources we can gain from right now.....and they are undertaxed.....and a significant amount of millionaires agree with Warren Buffet that this is the case.....many millionaires have benefitted from tax breaks and loopholes....now the gov't is asking them to give some of that back...I see nothing wrong with that at all
havent heard obama once say that the 50% that dont pay fed income tax need to pay their fair share...
fact is even if we taxed them 100% we would still be in debt over our head. Its not a revenue problem its a spending problem.
-
no - obama needs to be held accountable for his corruption and incompetence.
where is the corruption in this???..because you say so????
-
where is the corruption in this???..because you say so????
Go peruse my obama scandal thread. Its all in there.
-
Hey Andre, wipe Obama's shit off your nose and take a deep breath, you pathetic douche bag. Society as a whole is entitled to someone's money? Fuck off to Cuba or Europe with that shit and enjoy their non-existent GDP growth and 70% tax rate. Oh wait, even they're bankrupt. ::)
well you've started the name-calling but I won't bite this time.....first off, the rich and millionaires have always been the biggest contributors of taxes to the nation.....and they have paid a much bigger percentage of income in the past than they do now....there is nothing wrong with asking for a little more in hard times....we are simply asking them to do what they have always done.....this ideology that we should not ask the rich for anything is insane....and as I have stated..everyone should give....even welfare recipients should give back some of their checks...but you fail to mention that the rich benefit from tax breaks we don't get, loopholes in tax laws and especially in government subsidies worth billions..
look at Michele Bachmann for example who gets medicaid funds, yet rails against medicaid..and look at all the millionaire farmers who get gov't handouts....many of whom are in congress!...yet you prefer to focus on the poor.
-
okay so why didn't FOX air the interview????????
You mean why didn't Greta, an opinion show (i.e., not a hard news show), not air the interview? I don't know. Maybe because it was a garden variety, rambling rant saying what a million other liberals have said? Maybe she aired other, more coherent comments?
Greta usually has opposing viewpoints on her show.
-
well you've started the name-calling but I won't bite this time.....first off, the rich and millionaires have always been the biggest contributors of taxes to the nation.....and they have paid a much bigger percentage of income in the past than they do now....there is nothing wrong with asking for a little more in hard times....we are simply asking them to do what they have always done.....this ideology that we should not ask the rich for anything is insane....and as I have stated..everyone should give....even welfare recipients should give back some of their checks...but you fail to mention that the rich benefit from tax breaks we don't get, loopholes in tax laws and especially in government subsidies worth billions..
look at Michele Bachmann for example who gets medicaid funds, yet rails against medicaid..and look at all the millionaire farmers who get gov't handouts....many of whom are in congress!...yet you prefer to focus on the poor.
Why should anyone give more to the government when Downgrade has made it clear they intend to piss it away on hand outs to their union thugs and companies like Solyndra? I'd rather watch the rich light a pile of money on fire like the Joker in The Dark Knight. It would accomplish the same thing: jack shit.
-
You mean why didn't Greta, an opinion show (i.e., not a hard news show), not air the interview? I don't know. Maybe because it was a garden variety, rambling rant saying what a million other liberals have said? Maybe she aired other, more coherent comments?
Greta usually has opposing viewpoints on her show.
dude..no matter how you try to slant it..the guy was dead-on in his comments about FOX news coverage....and this is a common and growing complaint..they have been caught deliberately lying and slanting the news in a very overt way on many many occasions...your rant against me can't change that....why can't you admit that???..it doesn't make you look bad in the least in admitting that this is essentially true and that the guy was right..regardless of his politics
-
havent heard obama once say that the 50% that dont pay fed income tax need to pay their fair share...
fact is even if we taxed them 100% we would still be in debt over our head. Its not a revenue problem its a spending problem.
Obama and the economists all know this..which is why they are going after the rich..that's not hard to understand
-
Why should anyone give more to the government when Downgrade has made it clear they intend to piss it away on hand outs to their union thugs and companies like Solyndra? I'd rather watch the rich light a pile of money on fire like the Joker in The Dark Knight. It would accomplish the same thing: jack shit.
HA!..thats a funny analogy :D.......yes government spending must go down as well....but starving the gov't of money by not asking the rich to pay their fair share is not the solution either..it has to be a balanced approach where both happen...do you agree with that?
-
Obama and the economists all know this..which is why they are going after the rich..that's not hard to understand
So they're going after the rich because even if they confiscated 100% of everything they own we'd still be tens of trillions of dollars in debt? You're a fucking retard.
They're going after the rich because it rings home with deadbeats like yourself who, as you admitted in this thread, think you're entitled to other people's property.
-
Because that is not on the table with your Black Jesus (See "Confidence Men" for the term insiders in the admn use for Obama)
-
Obama and the economists all know this..which is why they are going after the rich..that's not hard to understand
what did you read my post?
what do they understand that we have a spending problem? that 50% not paying fed income taxes is unfair?
how does taxing the rich more solve either one of those?
-
dude..no matter how you try to slant it..the guy was dead-on in his comments about FOX news coverage....and this is a common and growing complaint..they have been caught deliberately lying and slanting the news in a very overt way on many many occasions...your rant against me can't change that....why can't you admit that???..it doesn't make you look bad in the least in admitting that this is essentially true and that the guy was right..regardless of his politics
My rant against you? Whatch you talkin bout Willis? What rant??
I disagree with his comments (and yours) about Fox News. Their hard news programming reports the news just like any other news network. They just do it better than other networks. That's why more people watch their news shows than any others.
They also do a better job with their opinion shows. That's why people would rather watch them than something the "Ed Show" on MSNBC.
-
So they're going after the rich because even if they confiscated 100% of everything they own we'd still be tens of trillions of dollars in debt? You're a fucking retard.
They're going after the rich because it rings home with deadbeats like yourself who, as you admitted in this thread, think you're entitled to other people's property.
so because we are in debt we shouldn't go after the most obvious source or revenue to begin to dig ourselves out of the hole?..thats a ludicrous suggestion.....so I'm a retard because I want to tax the rich at a higher rate and also tax the poor more and in addition, cut gov't spending?....wow.....you just argue to hear yourself talk obviously.....and you still haven't answered my question...you continuously come on here , spout nonsense but don't answer any direct question I ask you
get real
-
so because we are in debt we shouldn't go after the most obvious source or revenue to begin to dig ourselves out of the hole?..thats a ludicrous suggestion.....so I'm a retard because I want to tax the rich at a higher rate and also tax the poor more and in addition, cut gov't spending?....wow.....you just argue to hear yourself talk obviously.....and you still haven't answered my question...you continuously come on here , spout nonsense but don't answer any direct question I ask you
get real
You seem to think that increasing taxes won't have any significant impact on our economy. Funny, even Obama said you don't raise taxes in a recession because it only hampers a recovery.
Regardless, first it's taxes on the millionaires. Then when that doesn't do shit to fix our problems, it becomes taxes on the semi-millionaires. Then when that doesn't do shit to fix the problem it becomes taxes on the quarter-millionaires. Get it yet? ::)
Has anyone taken an economics class or studied economic history on this board? The AMT is a PERFECT example.
-
My rant against you? Whatch you talkin bout Willis? What rant??
I disagree with his comments (and yours) about Fox News. Their hard news programming reports the news just like any other news network. They just do it better than other networks. That's why more people watch their news shows than any others.
They also do a better job with their opinion shows. That's why people would rather watch them than something the "Ed Show" on MSNBC.
are we on the same planet?....maybe you're watching the Mars edition of FOX news..LOL...No way do they report the news better than CNN, nor are their opinion shows better when they overwhelmingly spout the conservative view....
I could care less about MSNBC..they are a non-factor as far as I'm concerned and I don't watch them either....but no one beats CNN in coverage and fairness
-
You seem to think that increasing taxes won't have any significant impact on our economy. Funny, even Obama said you don't raise taxes in a recession because it only hampers a recovery.
Regardless, first it's taxes on the millionaires. Then when that doesn't do shit to fix our problems, it becomes taxes on the semi-millionaires. Then when that doesn't do shit to fix the problem it becomes taxes on the quarter-millionaires. Get it yet? ::)
Has anyone taken an economics class or studied economic history on this board? The AMT is a PERFECT example.
again....haven't answered my question..I guess you won't
-
again....haven't answered my question..I guess you won't
I stopped reading your post after the first sentence as I knew the rest of it wouldn't say much of substance.
-
I stopped reading your post after the first sentence as I knew the rest of it wouldn't say much of substance.
you constantly avoid being pinned down....keep dodging....all talk and no substance..the only real thing about your arguments are the name -calling
-
you constantly avoid being pinned down....keep dodging....all talk and no substance..the only real thing about your arguments are the name -calling
Ironic considering we're still waiting for you to provide proof that I claimed Gadhafi never harmed anyone. :)
-
Ironic considering we're still waiting for you to provide proof that I claimed Gadhafi never harmed anyone. :)
lol, just what I was thinking. The little f@g who ran like a bitch when he couldn't back up his bullshit is now crying and accusing you of dodging.
Liberal - double - standards.
Gotta luv' em!
-
what did you read my post?
what do they understand that we have a spending problem? that 50% not paying fed income taxes is unfair?
how does taxing the rich more solve either one of those?
bump
-
lol, just what I was thinking. The little f@g who ran like a bitch when he couldn't back up his bullshit is now crying and accusing you of dodging.
Liberal - double - standards.
Gotta luv' em!
Didn't run at all....still standing....its you and BF who are engaged in name-calling....I'm just here giving the facts...sorry you guys can't handle it
-
bump
as I have stated, taxing the rich alone won't solve the problem by itself but it is one component of a larger solution....the rich must be taxed higher..no question about it...the 50% ers must be placed back on the tax rolls as well....entitlements have to shrink including corporate welfare, and subsidies to the rich (which you refuse to bring up)..spending must be cut and tax code must be simplified....do you agree?
or do you consider this a "socialist agenda"???
-
as I have stated, taxing the rich alone won't solve the problem by itself but it is one component of a larger solution....the rich must be taxed higher..no question about it...the 50% ers must be placed back on the tax rolls as well....entitlements have to shrink including corporate welfare, and subsidies to the rich (which you refuse to bring up)..spending must be cut and tax code must be simplified....do you agree?
or do you consider this a "socialist agenda"???
completely agree
now why doesnt obama agree with you and why do you continue to support legislation that address half the solution
-
as I have stated, taxing the rich alone won't solve the problem by itself but it is one component of a larger solution....the rich must be taxed higher..no question about it...the 50% ers must be placed back on the tax rolls as well....entitlements have to shrink including corporate welfare, and subsidies to the rich (which you refuse to bring up)..spending must be cut and tax code must be simplified....do you agree?
or do you consider this a "socialist agenda"???
You should tell this to some Dem politicians as Obama's jobs bill has zero sponsors and Reid refuses to vote on it. Wonder why?
Dems are pussies who know voting for tax increases is going to get even more of them bounced out in 2012. They, much like you, are much more content playing the class warfare game and acting like they actually care.
-
Obama does agree but he can't alienate his base by asking them to pay more taxes when the rich and corporations are making record profit and earnings.....it just won't go over well.....he will probably tax the poor in his second term, but to do so now before having a plan in place to tax the rich would be political suicide......
I do support legislation to tax the rich more because its the beginning of solving the problem and we have to start somewhere....not to mention, whether you like it or not, the American people want the rich taxed more as well....70% in some polls......
-
are we on the same planet?....maybe you're watching the Mars edition of FOX news..LOL...No way do they report the news better than CNN, nor are their opinion shows better when they overwhelmingly spout the conservative view....
I could care less about MSNBC..they are a non-factor as far as I'm concerned and I don't watch them either....but no one beats CNN in coverage and fairness
We're on the same planet. We have different opinions. I'm with the large majority that prefers Fox News coverage to CNN (although I watch both). If CNN did a better job, they would have better ratings. They don't.
I think CNN's website is and always has been better than Fox's website, but that's about it.
CNN has a pretty clear liberal bias. I guess liberals would consider that fair coverage.
-
You should tell this to some Dem politicians as Obama's jobs bill has zero sponsors and Reid refuses to vote on it. Wonder why?
Dems are pussies who know voting for tax increases is going to get even more of them bounced out in 2012. They, much like you, are much more content playing the class warfare game and acting like they actually care.
well..whats your solution???..you complain but offer nothing in terms of solving the problem..I am for the jobs bill...we can't wait any longer for the economy to turn itself around..we have to try something
-
well..whats your solution???..you complain but offer nothing in terms of solving the problem..I am for the jobs bill...we can't wait any longer for the economy to turn itself around..we have to try something
We have to try something? You say that as if we haven't tried anything yet.
Maybe government should get the fuck out of the way and stop "trying something".
Trying something got us Solyndra. ::)
-
We're on the same planet. We have different opinions. I'm with the large majority that prefers Fox News coverage to CNN (although I watch both). If CNN did a better job, they would have better ratings. They don't.
I think CNN's website is and always has been better than Fox's website, but that's about it.
CNN has a pretty clear liberal bias. I guess liberals would consider that fair coverage.
I don't see the bias you are talking about.....but it is clear on FOX.....I respect your opinion and I respect that FOX is your preference, but I really don't understand how you cannot see FOX's bias...
-
andreisdaman
Getbig V
Posts: 4269
Re: look at all this bush
« Reply #56 on: September 12, 2011, 06:18:41 AM » Quote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: Hulkster on September 11, 2011, 08:08:18 PM
agreed.
thats why I thank god every day that my girlfriend and soon to be wife has the most beautiful hairy pussy I have ever seen. and I have seen a lot of bush in my day ( well, mostly the computer monitor kind, but hey! ) LOL
it was grown back at my request back when we first met and she loves not having to shave it.
suits me fine!!
agreed...I even hate it that women shave their armpits..I always thought it was sexy..when I was a kid, women didn't shave their underarms either
________________________ ___________________
LMFAO!!!!
Andres' best post ever.
-
We have to try something? You say that as if we haven't tried anything yet.
Maybe government should get the fuck out of the way and stop "trying something".
Trying something got us Solyndra. ::)
(tapping my foot)...still waiting for an answer from you
-
I make no bones about it..I do love hairy women...many men do...you always derail the thread when you have no argument :D
-
(tapping my foot)...still waiting for an answer from you
Go listen to a Ron Paul speech. There's my solution.
(tapping my foot)... still waiting for you to put your money where your mouth is and show where I said Gadhafi never harmed anyone.
-
I don't see the bias you are talking about.....but it is clear on FOX.....I respect your opinion and I respect that FOX is your preference, but I really don't understand how you cannot see FOX's bias...
The Fox opinion shows do have a conservative bias. No question about that. The hard news shows? Not really.
-
The Fox opinion shows do have a conservative bias. No question about that. The hard news shows? Not really.
Even the hard news shows have been caught doctoring footage from what I understand, though I would have to research that to be honest....its what I have heard..but I will look it up and get back to you
-
Go listen to a Ron Paul speech. There's my solution.
(tapping my foot)... still waiting for you to put your money where your mouth is and show where I said Gadhafi never harmed anyone.
everyone knows that Ron is like a crazy uncle..he totally destroyed himself when he stated that Al Awlaki shouldn't have been executed
-
Didn't run at all....still standing....its you and BF who are engaged in name-calling....I'm just here giving the facts...sorry you guys can't handle it
You ran hard and fast little bitch. Still haven't backed up your bullshit.
-
You ran hard and fast little bitch. Still haven't backed up your bullshit.
you're just name-calling..you haven't written anything substantive in this thread yet
-
you're just name-calling..you haven't written anything substantive in this thread yet
You sure did worshipping hairy arm pits.
-
you're just name-calling..you haven't written anything substantive in this thread yet
Still haven't backed up your bullshit.
-
you haven't written anything substantive in this thread yet
Uh, yes. I'm the one who pointed out your blatant lie.
Oh, and you still haven't backed up your bullshit.
-
You sure did worshipping hairy arm pits.
you obviously are dumb-founded by the arguments in here and can't contemplate a response..so you derail the thread and bring up a totally un-related topic......typical
-
Uh, yes. I'm the one who pointed out your blatant lie.
Oh, and you still haven't backed up your bullshit.
dude what happened to you?.....you used to be a good poster..now you just troll and engage in name-calling....pull yourself together man!!!!!!...quit melting
-
dude what happened to you?.....you used to be a good poster..now you just troll and engage in name-calling....pull yourself together man!!!!!!...quit melting
He's not melting. He's just taking a liar to task.
-
are we on the same planet?....maybe you're watching the Mars edition of FOX news..LOL...No way do they report the news better than CNN, nor are their opinion shows better when they overwhelmingly spout the conservative view....
I could care less about MSNBC..they are a non-factor as far as I'm concerned and I don't watch them either....but no one beats CNN in coverage and fairness
PLEASE!!!
The difference between CNN and MSNBC is like the difference between an escort and a hooker.
-
He's not melting. He's just taking a liar to task.
sigh..do you even lift weights???.....all you do is come to GETBIG to meltdown and argue.....I never ever see you on the bodybuilding threads..how about picking up a weight????
-
sigh..do you even lift weights???.....all you do is come to GETBIG to meltdown and argue.....I never ever see you on the bodybuilding threads..how about picking up a weight????
I've posted pics of my physique before. What about you?
The G&O hasn't talked about lifting in years and I outgrew the "sport" of bodybuilding.
-
PLEASE!!!
The difference between CNN and MSNBC is like the difference between an escort and a hooker.
simply not true....CNN is head and shoulders above all other news networks....you gotta lay off the orange Cell-Tech dude....its causing delusions ;)
-
sigh..do you even lift weights???.....all you do is come to GETBIG to meltdown and argue.....I never ever see you on the bodybuilding threads..how about picking up a weight????
lol, another pathetic attempt not to back up your bullshit.
Man the fuck up already and come clean.
-
simply not true....CNN is head and shoulders above all other news networks....you gotta lay off the orange Cell-Tech dude....its causing delusions ;)
CNN has been firing people, left and right, because their ratings are abominable. "Head and shoulders about all other news networks"? This from the folks that were STUPID enough to put "Client #9" on prime time TV against Bill O'Reilly, and watch him get CRUSHED.
CNN is lame (with, at times, the lone exception of Wolf Blitzer). Fox News has been frog-stomping them for nearly a decade and that ain't changing anytime soon.
-
andreisdaman
Getbig V
Posts: 4269
Re: look at all this bush
« Reply #56 on: September 12, 2011, 06:18:41 AM » Quote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: Hulkster on September 11, 2011, 08:08:18 PM
agreed.
thats why I thank god every day that my girlfriend and soon to be wife has the most beautiful hairy pussy I have ever seen. and I have seen a lot of bush in my day ( well, mostly the computer monitor kind, but hey! ) LOL
it was grown back at my request back when we first met and she loves not having to shave it.
suits me fine!!
agreed...I even hate it that women shave their armpits..I always thought it was sexy..when I was a kid, women didn't shave their underarms either
________________________ ___________________
LMFAO!!!!
Andres' best post ever.
'
during the summer I shave mine; cuts down on the sweat odor and not much deodorant is needed. sweat evaporates much faster without all that hair.
-
CNN has been firing people, left and right, because their ratings are abominable. "Head and shoulders about all other news networks"? This from the folks that were STUPID enough to put "Client #9" on prime time TV against Bill O'Reilly, and watch him get CRUSHED.
CNN is lame (with, at times, the lone exception of Wolf Blitzer). Fox News has been frog-stomping them for nearly a decade and that ain't changing anytime soon.
because FOX caters to the bullshit people like you want to hear....they twist the news to serve their conservative viewership....If I had a network that fed me the lies I wanted to hear everyday I would watch too...also ratings don't mean much......I actually think PBS has the best news and their ratings are abysmal..
now hurry to GNC.....I hear Cell-tech is on sale ;)
-
FOX is #1 in cable news but couldn't get their guy elected in 2008. Despite yearlong anti-obama 24/7 programming.
-
FOX is #1 in cable news but couldn't get their guy elected in 2008. Despite yearlong anti-obama 24/7 programming.
wow; great point.
-
Andre - do you think Obama pissing away 535 Million to Solyndra is no big deal?
We loan billions of dollars to thousands of different companies every month. Some of them are going to go bankrupt. Solyndra's loan was done during both the Bush and Obama Administration so you can't blame either party. As long as its being investigated, it is a waste of time to report about it every single day and plaster it on the front page of a website. 500 million is a lot but its a drop in the bucket compared to every other loan given out.
-
We loan billions of dollars to thousands of different companies every month. Some of them are going to go bankrupt. Solyndra's loan was done during both the Bush and Obama Administration so you can't blame either party. As long as its being investigated, it is a waste of time to report about it every single day and plaster it on the front page of a website. 500 million is a lot but its a drop in the bucket compared to every other loan given out.
well I guess since it was only 600 mill we should just let it go...
bet you feel b/c only a few citizens died b/c of fast and furious we should let that go to...
goodness gracious
-
We loan billions of dollars to thousands of different companies every month. Some of them are going to go bankrupt. Solyndra's loan was done during both the Bush and Obama Administration so you can't blame either party. As long as its being investigated, it is a waste of time to report about it every single day and plaster it on the front page of a website. 500 million is a lot but its a drop in the bucket compared to every other loan given out.
Bush admn canceled it you moron!
-
Vince, did the Bush admin reject it or not?
-
Vince, did the Bush admin reject it or not?
dont worry it was only a mere 600 million, lets just sweep it under the rug...
-
dont worry it was only a mere 600 million, lets just sweep it under the rug...
This was the first loan this idiot admn did. There are many more solyndras to come.
-
OWS Jesse LaGreca to FOX News: Run the Damn Video
-
Again....giving money to solar companies is a risky proposition.....they inherently lose money and it is very hard to get Americans to buy into solar power because its expensive and inconvenient......The gov't is trying to expand into other areas of energy sources and this was one attempt to do so.....
yet everyone rails because they feel the gov't isn't doing enough to to wean ourselves off of oil..we can't have it both ways
-
Yes we can.
Nuclear energy.
-
i agree..nuclear energy would be the way to go...but the american people don't want it and politicians are too short-sighted to push for it...it would be a major battle to get more plants built....
meanwhile EVERYONE and their mother want to see solar energy and green technology pursued
-
i agree..nuclear energy would be the way to go...but the american people don't want it and politicians are too short-sighted to push for it...it would be a major battle to get more plants built....
meanwhile EVERYONE and their mother want to see solar energy and green technology pursued
No they dont. stop lying.
-
No they dont. stop lying.
yes they do.....all polls indicate this....and a large majority of the population want to see us being weaned off oil and especially foreign oil.....and they want to put an end to the environmental damage drilling causes and the pollution it spreads in the air....also many people believe that eventually solar energy will be much cheaper than electricity is now
so you are wrong again fool
-
yes they do.....all polls indicate this....and a large majority of the population want to see us being weaned off oil and especially foreign oil.....and they want to put an end to the environmental damage drilling causes and the pollution it spreads in the air....also many people believe that eventually solar energy will be much cheaper than electricity is now
so you are wrong again fool
And polls also say the majority want the illegal invaders booted out.
Tax payers dont want corrupt obama billionare donors getting corrupt deals Andre. Kenyanomics is a failure, get over it.
-
And polls also say the majority want the illegal invaders booted out.
Tax payers dont want corrupt obama billionare donors getting corrupt deals Andre. Kenyanomics is a failure, get over it.
sigh why do I even try?...doesn't being retarded make your brain tired???
-
It's a good and prudent idea to pursue solar and green tech. It's not a good idea to issue loan guarantees to companies that can't prove they can't make a profit.
-
It's a good and prudent idea to pursue solar and green tech. It's not a good idea to issue loan guarantees to companies that can't prove they can't make a profit.
Yeah, we were way too late for the party. China has been developing solar and wind so long that they are almost a decade ahead of us.
-
It's a good and prudent idea to pursue solar and green tech. It's not a good idea to issue loan guarantees to companies that can't prove they can't make a profit.
no solar company can prove that they can make a profit :)
-
Yeah, we were way too late for the party. China has been developing solar and wind so long that they are almost a decade ahead of us.
wind power is actually overblown..and china has been developing it without properly debating the issue.....the gov't there can do what it wants even if it turns out to be inefficient and costly in the end.....wind power is unreliable and takes up a lot of land mass for the wind turbines..there are other problems with it as well
-
Yeah, we were way too late for the party. China has been developing solar and wind so long that they are almost a decade ahead of us.
And Europe is 20 years ahead with nuclear power.
-
If you can't turn a profit no need to waste 500 million.
-
I FUCKING HATE Wall St. gambling away tax payer dollars with bad bets.
I FUCKING LOVE President Downgrade gambling away tax payer dollars with bad bets.
I am the 99%
-
FOX is #1 in cable news but couldn't get their guy elected in 2008. Despite yearlong anti-obama 24/7 programming.
It wasn't Fox's job to get McCain elected. Fox exposed Obama for who he really is, while the other networks were all on his jock.
Now, they act all surprised, because nearly all of the foolishness, regarding this administration is coming to light, what Fox News and conservative media exposed from the get-go.
-
I FUCKING HATE Wall St. gambling away tax payer dollars with bad bets.
I FUCKING LOVE President Downgrade gambling away tax payer dollars with bad bets.
I am the 99%
LMFAO!!!!!
that about sums it up no?
-
LMFAO all talking points and bashing FOX maybe you can answer the question that no of them or anybody on this board has had the ability to do yet.
Why are they entitled to the money of the top 1%?
LMFAO at total nonsense like solyndra, do you even know what thats about?
if you did you wouldnt be saying the guy destroyed anyone...he made some good points about newscore but thats where it ended everythng outside of that was a self owning you moron.
Because the top 1% have stolen their money from the rest?
-
Now the entire "1%" are thiefs. Neither them, nor their predecessors ever earned what they have.
LOL!!! Obama has been able to fool plenty of idiots into supporting his class warfare.
-
These morons are blaming the symptom not the cause.
-
Now the entire "1%" are thiefs. Neither them, nor their predecessors ever earned what they have.
LOL!!! Obama has been able to fool plenty of idiots into supporting his class warfare.
You think you get this rich without fucking people over? You live in a FOX dream world
-
And Europe is 20 years ahead with nuclear power.
this is true..but the U.S. has a very strong anti-nuclear sentiment in the country
-
this is true..but the U.S. has a very strong anti-nuclear sentiment in the country
And a very Strong Solyndra sentiment in the WH
-
If you can't turn a profit no need to waste 500 million.
I'm sure they said the same thing about the internet.....and electric cars......the fact is ..you gotta waste some money until you can learn how to turn a profit with any technology..there is no way around this
-
Where is the destruction? Epic thread backfire.
-
Where is the destruction? Epic thread backfire.
EPIC DENIAL
-
EPIC DENIAL
-
EPIC DENIAL
YOU=EPIC STUPIDITY
-
YOU=EPIC STUPIDITY
every time you enter a thread you bring the dumbness with you....sigh :)...the guy destroyed FOX....told the truth and left the producer a mess....he and FOX won't recover
-
every time you enter a thread you bring the dumbness with you....sigh :)...the guy destroyed FOX....told the truth and left the producer a mess....he and FOX won't recover
LMFAO! Civil War re-enactor who thinks Solyndra is no big deal.
-
Does anyone disagree that there has been unethical collusion between wall street, banks and our government?
Or are we just going to fall in tool time place and play the point the finger game?
-
Does anyone disagree that there has been unethical collusion between wall street, banks and our government?
Or are we just going to fall in tool time place and play the point the finger game?
Have you read Suskinds' book?
-
Does anyone disagree that there has been unethical collusion between wall street, banks and our government?
Or are we just going to fall in tool time place and play the point the finger game?
we need to find a way to get rid of the lobbyists or at least limit their activities..thats where it starts
-
we need to find a way to get rid of the lobbyists or at least limit their activities..thats where it starts
Maybe we should start at the top no?
-
Have you read Suskinds' book?
No not yet. I am going on a long business trip starting next week and was planing to take it with me to read on the plane and such.
Have you finished it yet?
-
No not yet. I am going on a long business trip starting next week and was planing to take it with me to read on the plane and such.
Have you finished it yet?
3/4 way through. Its actually pretty sickening.
-
Maybe we should start at the top no?
I think that is a forgone conclusion at this point save for the earnest of kneepadders. But it will continue to happen unless something is done structurally to prevent it. Skip idea of ethics and morality at the personal level sounds good, but i don't think it will ever materialize.
-
-
Another misguided liberal who has no clue what he's talking about.
-
What a moron. Solyndra no big deal? LMFAO!
-
Another misguided liberal who has no clue what he's talking about.
wouldn't that have been a great reason for Faux News to air the interview?
-
wouldn't that have been a great reason for Faux News to air the interview?
Maybe they did not want to air a drunken mess in a Civil War hat who thinks giving 500 million to a corrupt obama BILLIONAIRE donor, then subverting said donors rights above the taxpayer in bankruptcy, was no big deal?
Only a commie tampon like yourself could think Solyndra is no big deal.
-
What a moron. Solyndra no big deal? LMFAO!
8+ billion of cash went missing in Iraq and that apparently was no big deal
how can something 1/16th the size be considered a big deal by that benchmark?
btw - here are some facts you probably never heard on Faux News (or in your case you could have well heard them and just chose to ignore them as you do everything that doesn't fit your preconceived beliefs)
from Wike and Media Matters
On September 19, 2011, Media Matters reported that in a rush to cover the bankruptcy of Solyndra, many news media outlets have misrepresented or omitted key facts. Among these are the fact that the panel of career officials that remanded the project during the Bush administration is the exact same committee that then approved the loan guarantee transaction several months later after due diligence, the fact that the email stating that the loan was "not ready for prime time" was not a warning about financial risk but was in fact an email concerned with the timing of the announcement and not the merits of the loan guarantee, and the fact that while the George Kaiser Family Foundation made investments, Solyndra had "close ties to both political parties” including the conservative Walton family, which was the second largest investor and is a major donor to republicans.
-
Maybe they did not want to air a drunken mess in a Civil War hat who thinks giving 500 million to a corrupt obama BILLIONAIRE donor, then subverting said donors rights above the taxpayer in bankruptcy, was no big deal?
Only a commie tampon like yourself could think Solyndra is no big deal.
looks sober to me
maybe he appears drunk because you're the one that's drunk (although again, with you one can never tell since you see and hear things that no other viewer/listener can see or hear)
-
LMFAO - BUSH ADMN CANCELED AND REJECTED SOLYNDRA LOAN YOU FUCKING TAMPON!
-
LMFAO - BUSH ADMN CANCELED AND REJECTED SOLYNDRA LOAN YOU FUCKING TAMPON!
again, your lack of reading comprehension is profound
you should really consider a complete neurological check up
-
again, your lack of reading comprehension is profound
you should really consider a complete neurological check up
No - Bush admn canceled the solyndra loan because it was a scam. Obama, your messiah and black jesus, approved of this scam at the behest of his billionaire buddy Kaiser only 9 days into his admn.
-
Does anyone disagree that there has been unethical collusion between wall street, banks and our government?
Or are we just going to fall in tool time place and play the point the finger game?
Obama did it.. boom
-
Obama did it.. boom
Yes he did -
-
LMFAO - BUSH ADMN CANCELED AND REJECTED SOLYNDRA LOAN YOU FUCKING TAMPON!
yes but he makes a point...no problem with 8 billion missing right????
-
yes but he makes a point...no problem with 8 billion missing right????
And Obama has 860 BILLION missing from the Stim Bill. What is your point tampon?
-
And Obama has 860 BILLION missing from the Stim Bill. What is your point tampon?
sigh.................... ........................ ........................ ........................ ..the dumbness continues
-
sigh..............................................................................................the dumbness continues
Are you smoking the same crack obama does?
-
LMFAO - BUSH ADMN CANCELED AND REJECTED SOLYNDRA LOAN YOU FUCKING TAMPON!
333 - for a guy who seems to be on the computer 24/7 I don't know how you manage to stay so uninformed (or rather, misinformed)
I don't have time for to address the lies you picked up from Faux News and other right wing website
here are a few quick facts Faux New probably forgot to tell you (or again you heard them and just ingored them)
you can find the complete list here (for future reference, this is how you provide a link to support a claim):
http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2011/09/13/317594/timeline-bush-administration-solyndra-loan-guarantee/
July 2005: The Bush Administration signs the Energy Policy Act of 2005 into law, creating the 1703 loan guarantee program.
December 2006: Solyndra Applies for a Loan Guarantee under the 1703 program.
Late 2007: Loan guarantee program is funded. Solyndra was one of 16 clean-tech companies deemed ready to move forward in the due diligence process. The Bush Administration DOE moves forward to develop a conditional commitment.
January 2009: In an effort to show it has done something to support renewable energy, the Bush Administration tries to take Solyndra before a DOE credit review committee before President Obama is inaugurated. The committee, consisting of career civil servants with financial expertise, remands the loan back to DOE “without prejudice” because it wasn’t ready for conditional commitment.
March 2009: The same credit committee approves the strengthened loan application. The deal passes on to DOE’s credit review board. Career staff (not political appointees) within the DOE issue a conditional commitment setting out terms for a guarantee.
September 2009: Solyndra raises an additional $219 million. Shortly after, the DOE closes a $535 million loan guarantee after six months of due diligence. This is the first loan guarantee issued under the 1703 program. From application to closing, the process took three years – not the 41 days that is sometimes reported. OMB did raise some concerns in August not about the loan itself but how the loan should be “scored.” OMB testified Wednesday that they were comfortable with the final scoring
March 2011: Republican Representatives complain that DOE funds are not being spent quickly enough.
House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI): “despite the Administration’s urgency and haste to pass the bill [the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act] … billions of dollars have yet to be spent.”
And House Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee Chairman Cliff Stearns (R-FL): “The whole point of the Democrat’s stimulus bill was to spend billions of dollars … most of the money still hasn’t been spent.”
August 2011: DOE refuses to restructure the loan a second time.
September 2011: Solyndra closes its manufacturing facility, lays off 1,100 workers and files for bankruptcy. The news is touted as a failure of the Obama Administration and the loan guarantee office. However, as of September 12, the DOE loan programs office closed or issued conditional commitments of $37.8 billion to projects around the country. The $535 million loan is only 1.3% of DOE’s loan portfolio. To date, Solyndra is the only loan that’s known to be troubled.
Meanwhile, after complaining about stimulus funds moving too slowly, Congressmen Fred Upton and Cliff Stearns are now claiming that the Administration was pushing funds out the door too quickly: “In the rush to get stimulus cash out the door, despite repeated claims by the Administration to the contrary, some bets were bad from the beginning.”
-
Are you smoking the same crack obama does?
I am really happy you have a safe outlet to get your racist tendencies out.....you don't dare bring the dumbness to any of those "savages" in your neighborhood
-
333 - for a guy who seems to be on the computer 24/7 I don't know how you manage to stay so uninformed (or rather, misinformed)
I don't have time for to address the lies you picked up from Faux News and other right wing website
here are a few quick facts Faux New probably forgot to tell you (or again you heard them and just ingored them)
you can find the complete list here (for future reference, this is how you provide a link to support a claim):
http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2011/09/13/317594/timeline-bush-administration-solyndra-loan-guarantee/
July 2005: The Bush Administration signs the Energy Policy Act of 2005 into law, creating the 1703 loan guarantee program.
December 2006: Solyndra Applies for a Loan Guarantee under the 1703 program.
Late 2007: Loan guarantee program is funded. Solyndra was one of 16 clean-tech companies deemed ready to move forward in the due diligence process. The Bush Administration DOE moves forward to develop a conditional commitment.
January 2009: In an effort to show it has done something to support renewable energy, the Bush Administration tries to take Solyndra before a DOE credit review committee before President Obama is inaugurated. The committee, consisting of career civil servants with financial expertise, remands the loan back to DOE “without prejudice” because it wasn’t ready for conditional commitment.
March 2009: The same credit committee approves the strengthened loan application. The deal passes on to DOE’s credit review board. Career staff (not political appointees) within the DOE issue a conditional commitment setting out terms for a guarantee.
September 2009: Solyndra raises an additional $219 million. Shortly after, the DOE closes a $535 million loan guarantee after six months of due diligence. This is the first loan guarantee issued under the 1703 program. From application to closing, the process took three years – not the 41 days that is sometimes reported. OMB did raise some concerns in August not about the loan itself but how the loan should be “scored.” OMB testified Wednesday that they were comfortable with the final scoring
March 2011: Republican Representatives complain that DOE funds are not being spent quickly enough.
House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI): “despite the Administration’s urgency and haste to pass the bill [the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act] … billions of dollars have yet to be spent.”
And House Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee Chairman Cliff Stearns (R-FL): “The whole point of the Democrat’s stimulus bill was to spend billions of dollars … most of the money still hasn’t been spent.”
August 2011: DOE refuses to restructure the loan a second time.
September 2011: Solyndra closes its manufacturing facility, lays off 1,100 workers and files for bankruptcy. The news is touted as a failure of the Obama Administration and the loan guarantee office. However, as of September 12, the DOE loan programs office closed or issued conditional commitments of $37.8 billion to projects around the country. The $535 million loan is only 1.3% of DOE’s loan portfolio. To date, Solyndra is the only loan that’s known to be troubled.
Meanwhile, after complaining about stimulus funds moving too slowly, Congressmen Fred Upton and Cliff Stearns are now claiming that the Administration was pushing funds out the door too quickly: “In the rush to get stimulus cash out the door, despite repeated claims by the Administration to the contrary, some bets were bad from the beginning.”
LMFAO! Are you fng kidding? have you read the emails from Ratner, chu, rahm etc? Kaiser was pressing this thing too moron!
-
LMFAO! Are you fng kidding? have you read the emails from Ratner, chu, rahm etc? Kaiser was pressing this thing too moron!
if you knew how to post a link to support a claim I would read them
how much you want to bet if you actually post the links that I'll find they support the facts I've listed above and refute your beliefs
btw - read my posts. Kaiser has been addressed multiple times.
so what should I expect from you next..... links to quotes or a bunch of pictures of Obama?
I'm off to a dentist appointment which I expect will be more enjoyable than trying to help you find your way back to reality
-
if you knew how to post a link to support a claim I would read them
how much you want to bet if you actually post the links that I'll the support the facts I've listed above and refute your beliefs
btw - read my posts. Kaiser has been addressed multiple times.
so what should I expect from you next..... links to quotes or a bunch of pictures of Obama?
I'm off to a dentist appointment which I expect will be more enjoyable than trying to help you find your way back to reality
LMFAO!
I have an entire thread on Solyndra alone!
-
LMFAO!
I have an entire thread on Solyndra alone!
pages and pages of bullshit and no actual facts
-
LMFAO - BUSH ADMN CANCELED AND REJECTED SOLYNDRA LOAN YOU FUCKING TAMPON!
If this were true (that Bush admin cancelled and rejected Solyndra) then why did they try to take Solyndra before a DOE credit review committee just one day before President Obama is inaugurated. The committee, consisting of career civil servants with financial expertise, remands the loan back to DOE because it wasn't ready for conditional commitment
-
If this were true (that Bush admin cancelled and rejected Solyndra) then why did they try to take Solyndra before a DOE credit review committee just one day before President Obama is inaugurated. The committee, consisting of career civil servants with financial expertise, remands the loan back to DOE because it wasn't ready for conditional commitment
DOE warned the loan was not ready for prime time and warned against it fool! Again - i bumped the threads with the proof moron.
-
DOE warned the loan was not ready for prime time and warned against it fool! Again - i bumped the threads with the proof moron.
why is it you can't read
I posted this on page 6:
I'll ask you again, why did the Bush Administration try to take Solyndra before a DOE credit review committee just one day before President Obama is inaugurated
from Wike and Media Matters
On September 19, 2011, Media Matters reported that in a rush to cover the bankruptcy of Solyndra, many news media outlets have misrepresented or omitted key facts. Among these are the fact that the panel of career officials that remanded the project during the Bush administration is the exact same committee that then approved the loan guarantee transaction several months later after due diligence, the fact that the email stating that the loan was "not ready for prime time" was not a warning about financial risk but was in fact an email concerned with the timing of the announcement and not the merits of the loan guarantee, and the fact that while the George Kaiser Family Foundation made investments, Solyndra had "close ties to both political parties” including the conservative Walton family, which was the second largest investor and is a major donor to republicans.
-
LMFAO! ! ! ! !
Are you stupid or what? Obama's own people told him this farce was going to go bankrupt in September 2011!
-
LMFAO! ! ! ! !
Are you stupid or what? Obama's own people told him this farce was going to go bankrupt in September 2011!
I'm providing you quotes and links and you can't even defend your position so you resort to just calling me names
I'll ask you yet again - Why did the Bush Administration try to take Solyndra before a DOE credit review committee just one day before President Obama is inaugurated
If you don't know they answer then just say so
-
I'm providing you quotes and links and you can't even defend your position so you resort to just calling me names
I'll ask you yet again - Why did the Bush Administration try to take Solyndra before a DOE credit review committee just one day before President Obama is inaugurated
If you don't know they answer then just say so
Because they were researching the loan and as it advanced they recommended against it as the companies finances were collapsing. I bumped about 10 threads proving that you are a fucking moron. Go peruse and get off your obama talking points that make you look worse.
-
Because they were researching the loan and as it advanced they recommended against it as the companies finances were collapsing. I bumped about 10 threads proving that you are a fucking moron. Go peruse and get off your obama talking points that make you look worse.
you didn't answer the question
why did the Bush Administration try to take Solyndra before a DOE credit review committee just one day before President Obama is inaugurated
-
you didn't answer the question
why did the Bush Administration try to take Solyndra before a DOE credit review committee just one day before President Obama is inaugurated
TAKE IT FOR A REVIEW!!!! A review is not a recommendation to approve it you dope!
-
TAKE IT FOR A REVIEW!!!! A review is not a recommendation to approve it you dope!
yes, take it for review and try to get it approved under their administration
why bother doing it on the last day of your 8 year term
333 - I'll make you a deal
I'm going to give you one link to read in it's entirety and then you can give me one link (if you can) and I'll do the same
http://mediamatters.org/research/201109190020
-
yes, take it for review and try to get it approved under their administration
why bother doing it on the last day of your 8 year term
333 - I'll make you a deal
I'm going to give you one link to read in it's entirety and then you can give me one link (if you can) and I'll do the same
http://mediamatters.org/research/201109190020
I bumped the proof on this site. the CEO said obama was the reason it got approved.
-
I bumped the proof on this site. the CEO said obama was the reason it got approved.
did you read the link in it's entirety
yes or no?
-
did you read the link in it's entirety
yes or no?
Again - this is the Obama incometence and ignorance defense.
Obama: "I am not a criminal, I am just painfully incompetent and ignorant."
-
Again - this is the Obama incometence and ignorance defense.
Obama: "I am not a criminal, I am just painfully incompetent and ignorant."
it's neither of those
now did you read the entire link......yes or no ?
if not, then don't expect me to answer any more of your questions or respond to your constant requests for attention
-
it's neither of those
now did you read the entire link......yes or no ?
if not, then don't expect me to answer any more of your questions or respond to your constant requests for attention
I read it, it's pure nonsense and lies by omission.