Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: 240 is Back on December 31, 2011, 08:09:48 AM
-
How long until getbiggers are saying "South Carolina doesn't really matter anyway..."?
Ron Paul's campaign is looking ahead to South Carolina, announcing it is going up with a "six-figure dollar range" ad buy in the crucial Southern gateway.
The Paul ad strategy has played a major role in helping him to expand his voting base, and with his work close to done in Iowa, he's starting to line up his ducks elsewhere.
-
How long until getbiggers are saying "South Carolina doesn't really matter anyway..."?
Ron Paul's campaign is looking ahead to South Carolina, announcing it is going up with a "six-figure dollar range" ad buy in the crucial Southern gateway.
The Paul ad strategy has played a major role in helping him to expand his voting base, and with his work close to done in Iowa, he's starting to line up his ducks elsewhere.
He needs to S T F U about Iran fast. If he sticks to the bread and butter issues about spending, debt, inflation, and obamas failed presidency he will do better in SC
-
i like his new strategy of ignoring the media :)
they ignored him for 6 years. now they want to talk to him, lol!
-
i like his new strategy of ignoring the media :)
they ignored him for 6 years. now they want to talk to him, lol!
He taking the next few days off in Iowa. He must be feeling pretty confident.
-
He taking the next few days off in Iowa. He must be feeling pretty confident.
his supporters in place and he may be the default or backup choice for many bachmann, perry, or santorum (or even newt) voters who will make their initial stand at the caucus, then roll with the biggest anti-romney crowd in the room.
And the media is BEGGING for him to make a gaffe they can make the #1 story on monday. He''s smart to give them the finger and lay back in the cut.
-
How long until getbiggers are saying "South Carolina doesn't really matter anyway..."?
Ron Paul's campaign is looking ahead to South Carolina, announcing it is going up with a "six-figure dollar range" ad buy in the crucial Southern gateway.
The Paul ad strategy has played a major role in helping him to expand his voting base, and with his work close to done in Iowa, he's starting to line up his ducks elsewhere.
Can Paul become our President?
It sounds like he has a really great team now, does he?
???
-
He needs to S T F U about Iran fast. If he sticks to the bread and butter issues about spending, debt, inflation, and obamas failed presidency he will do better in SC
The fact of the matter is that foreign policy is the one thing that differentiates him from the other candidates. The other candidates (especially Bachmann) have practically usurped his entire economic policy. He just needs to make a clear case for his differences.
A shorter version of this would be a good start:
-
He taking the next few days off in Iowa. He must be feeling pretty confident.
lol. Seriously? It probably has more to do with him not being able to stand the heat in the kitchen.
-
lol. Seriously? It probably has more to do with him not being able to stand the heat in the kitchen.
Yes, it has nothing to do with him consistently polling first or second. ::)
-
Yes, it has nothing to do with him consistently polling first or second. ::)
No, it has nothing do with him not wanting to answer tough questions. ::)
-
No, it has nothing do with him not wanting to answer tough questions. ::)
Which he has answered time and time again...
-
Which he has answered time and time again...
Except when he walked out of an interview. lol It's pretty obvious he was uncomfortable having to go through the unfortunate normal vetting process when he finally became relevant (at least in Iowa).
-
Except when he walked out of an interview. lol It's pretty obvious he was uncomfortable having to go through the unfortunate normal vetting process when he finally became relevant (at least in Iowa).
He walked out of an interview after he answered a question repeatedly and the interviewer refused to stop peppering him with the same inane bullshit. Compare that to your preferred candidate, who threw a temper tantrum over being seated in the back of a plane and shutdown the government as a result.
-
Except when he walked out of an interview. lol It's pretty obvious he was uncomfortable having to go through the unfortunate normal vetting process when he finally became relevant (at least in Iowa).
agreed that it's part of the vetting process, and agreed, he should answer the same Q 30 times.
However, I think its an added irritatnt to him that he was ignored by this media for so many years - not they ONLY want to talk to him to bring down his poll numbers. I'd be tempted to ignore them too. Every time CNN gave us "Bachmann wins iowa ames straw poll, Tpaw grabs 3rd", ignoring him at 2nd.
F' em. They ignored him then, he can ignore them now. The frontrunner wants to do as little media as possible - see Mitt the last 6 months (until newt overtook him).
-
He walked out of an interview after he answered a question repeatedly and the interviewer refused to stop peppering him with the same inane bullshit. Compare that to your preferred candidate, who threw a temper tantrum over being seated in the back of a plane and shutdown the government as a result.
I don't have a preferred candidate. Just talking the facts. And personal baggage aside, Newt is the most qualified man in the race. I've already said I think he forfeited his right to be president based on his hypocrisy during the Clinton impeachment, but that doesn't mean he isn't qualified to be president.
He wasn't peppered with the same questions. I've already posted the questions in whatever thread that was. They weren't the same. And it was/is a legitimate issue. He was poorly prepared to address those newsletters. That's his own fault.
-
Yes, Ron Paul has poorly handled the newsletters, but if you watch the actual interview, the interviewer was a guy who was clearly looking to score a point with her left-wing "everyone on the Right is a racist" friends.
Regarding Newt, his qualifications are being a Big Government RINO who has accepted lobby money from GSEs and then lied about it... that is AFTER his unethical financial behavior in the House, after being the only House Speaker to be censured, etc.
-
Yes, Ron Paul has poorly handled the newsletters, but if you watch the actual interview, the interviewer was a guy who was clearly looking to score a point with her left-wing "everyone on the Right is a racist" friends.
Regarding Newt, his qualifications are being a Big Government RINO who has accepted lobby money from GSEs and then lied about it... that is AFTER his unethical financial behavior in the House, after being the only House Speaker to be censured, etc.
I watched it. If he would have done a better job preparing his answers, which he about more than 10 years to do, it would have gone much better.
Regarding Newt, that's why I said "personal baggage aside." He has a lot of problems. No question about that.
-
How long until getbiggers are saying "South Carolina doesn't really matter anyway..."?
Ron Paul's campaign is looking ahead to South Carolina, announcing it is going up with a "six-figure dollar range" ad buy in the crucial Southern gateway.
The Paul ad strategy has played a major role in helping him to expand his voting base, and with his work close to done in Iowa, he's starting to line up his ducks elsewhere.
It matters - but not as much as it could. SC, like you Floridian douchebags lost half their delegates. I think they've only got like 25 now as opposed to 50 or so.
-
It matters - but not as much as it could. SC, like you Floridian douchebags lost half their delegates. I think they've only got like 25 now as opposed to 50 or so.
Not sure if losing delegates will impact this, but SC predicts the nominee in pretty much every cycle.
-
It matters - but not as much as it could. SC, like you Floridian douchebags lost half their delegates. I think they've only got like 25 now as opposed to 50 or so.
we are some douchebags, to be sure.
but we decide the national elections, to be sure.
-
Not sure if losing delegates will impact this, but SC predicts the nominee in pretty much every cycle.
I don't know how things will be affected. They are not holding in their previous time spot and only have 1/2 their delegates. So, it may or may not be a good predictor.
-
I don't know how things will be affected. They are not holding in their previous time spot and only have 1/2 their delegates. So, it may or may not be a good predictor.
Yeah. We'll see. Despite Newt dropping in the polls I think he's still very much in it with Romney.