Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Tre on January 03, 2012, 10:04:45 AM

Title: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: Tre on January 03, 2012, 10:04:45 AM

Luck is the consensus(??) #1, but Kordell 'Hey, hey, hey!' Stewart says RG III is the best QB available AND will have the better pro career. 

What's GetBig gonna do?
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: QuakerOats on January 03, 2012, 10:13:40 AM
RG3 is a better version of Michael Vick with a better arm, if he has even half a brain to grasp a playbook he SHOULD BE the better of the two, Luck really impressed me agaist OK State though.
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: Tito24 on January 03, 2012, 10:15:08 AM
he who speak loudest and last aint right
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: TrapsMcLats on January 03, 2012, 10:28:22 AM
Both will be good, Luck will be better. I mean, he's white, cmon now... its a white man's position. 
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: El Diablo Blanco on January 03, 2012, 10:43:46 AM
Blacks don't make for long term QBs.  Especially when they start to make the money.
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: King Shizzo on January 03, 2012, 10:46:12 AM
Hopes are high on the kid after everyone watched what Cam Newton did this year.
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: MB on January 03, 2012, 10:51:55 AM
RG III is a little on the small side and will probably have an injury plagued career.  Luck is a bigger version of Aaron Rodgers.  
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: AlphaMaleDawg on January 03, 2012, 10:54:05 AM
I can't see how anyone wouldn't thing RG3 isn't going to be a great pro. He is a terrific passer and also an accurate one (usually black qb's aren't good passers but can run)...and he can run wild. He will be on Cam Newton's level or close. Newton is a phenominon. RG3 will be very good but maybe not THAT good.

Luck I think will be great but he will be stuck behind peyton manning for 3-4 years probably
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: The U on January 03, 2012, 11:38:49 AM
RG3 is a better version of Michael Vick with a better arm, if he has even half a brain to grasp a playbook he SHOULD BE the better of the two, Luck really impressed me agaist OK State though.

Come on Dave.............Mike Vick has a once in a generation arm.  He's certainly not a member of mensa and never worked too hard at his craft though..........leading to his overall mediocrity. 

RG3 will be a legit pro QB, I expect him to be an eventual pro bowler.

Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: AlphaMaleDawg on January 03, 2012, 12:13:30 PM
Come on Dave.............Mike Vick has a once in a generation arm.  He's certainly not a member of mensa and never worked too hard at his craft though..........leading to his overall mediocrity. 

RG3 will be a legit pro QB, I expect him to be an eventual pro bowler.



RG3 is more accurate than Vick. His passing numbers are silly
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: The U on January 03, 2012, 12:46:19 PM
RG3 is more accurate than Vick. His passing numbers are silly

I agree completely.......Just saying Vick's arm strength is off the charts.  Been to any UD games this season AMD?
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: BOW on January 03, 2012, 12:48:06 PM
RG III is a little on the small side and will probably have an injury plagued career.  Luck is a bigger version of Aaron Rodgers.  
you do realize rg3 is the same or bigger than half the current nfl starting qb's. This is just your traditional pre-draft talk to lower a players stock
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: El Diablo Blanco on January 03, 2012, 12:51:06 PM
A quarterback ain't nothing if he is not in the right system.  How little you guys know about football.  Joe Montana is a great QB and ran the west coast perfectly.  I doubt he would have been 1/2 as good in a run and gun.  But ask Moon to play west coast and he would be lost.

Look last weekend, Matt Flynn torches the Lions.  Is he better than Rogers?  Probably not, but system is designed for a certain QB.

Jeff George had one of the strongest arms in NFL history but played in the wrong style of offense.  they wanted to run a lot of slants and short passes and the fucker threw so hard his receivers could never catch and he couldn't adapt to that system. 

Alex Smith is looking like a stud this year playing for a coach with a system that works, the last three coaches couldn't figure it out.

Tom Brady gets hurt and Matt Cassell leads them to 11-5 record, then can't do so well now. A lot of teams draft the best QB, but not the best QB for their system.  Luck won't fait well in the Indy system.  Peyton likes to make quick slant passes, run the no huddle a lot and barely airs it out and NEVER runs.  Luck is in an offense that uses the run to setup the pass at Standford where Indy just passes and runs when no one is stacked on the line.  The OKC QB would actually fit better in the Indy system as they run similar plays, where Luck would fit well in a system like Washington or Seatle.

Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: G_Thang on January 03, 2012, 12:56:50 PM
A quarterback ain't nothing if he is not in the right system.  How little you guys know about football.  Joe Montana is a great QB and ran the west coast perfectly.  I doubt he would have been 1/2 as good in a run and gun.  But ask Moon to play west coast and he would be lost.

Look last weekend, Matt Flynn torches the Lions.  Is he better than Rogers?  Probably not, but system is designed for a certain QB.

Jeff George had one of the strongest arms in NFL history but played in the wrong style of offense.  they wanted to run a lot of slants and short passes and the fucker threw so hard his receivers could never catch and he couldn't adapt to that system. 

Alex Smith is looking like a stud this year playing for a coach with a system that works, the last three coaches couldn't figure it out.

Tom Brady gets hurt and Matt Cassell leads them to 11-5 record, then can't do so well now. A lot of teams draft the best QB, but not the best QB for their system.  Luck won't fait well in the Indy system.  Peyton likes to make quick slant passes, run the no huddle a lot and barely airs it out and NEVER runs.  Luck is in an offense that uses the run to setup the pass at Standford where Indy just passes and runs when no one is stacked on the line.  The OKC QB would actually fit better in the Indy system as they run similar plays, where Luck would fit well in a system like Washington or Seatle.



don't tell anyone this.  how many guaranteed #1 in the nfl have finished their careers as HofFers?  the jets would benefit more moving to get him and unloading their wasted #1.
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: El Diablo Blanco on January 03, 2012, 01:00:32 PM
don't tell anyone this.  how many guaranteed #1 in the nfl have finished their careers as HofFers?  the jets would benefit more moving to get him and unloading their wasted #1.

Bingo.  Teams get enamoured with the best QB in college but don't think how he would work in their system.  David Carr shouldn't have been a bust but was not given the chance.  Flacco sucks donkey nuts as a QB but has good record due to his team and system he is in. Drew Brees was ok in San Diego, but then Payton builds a total run and gun system and Brees turns into Marino.

Remember Akili Smith.  Shit.
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: El Diablo Blanco on January 03, 2012, 01:01:57 PM
don't tell anyone this.  how many guaranteed #1 in the nfl have finished their careers as HofFers?  the jets would benefit more moving to get him and unloading their wasted #1.

The thinking is if Indy doesn't give Manning his $28 million bonus and decides to run with Luck that Manning will go to the Jets.  That might end up playing like the Brett Favre years.
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: The U on January 03, 2012, 01:05:07 PM
Bingo.  Teams get enamoured with the best QB in college but don't think how he would work in their system.  David Carr shouldn't have been a bust but was not given the chance.  Flacco sucks donkey nuts as a QB but has good record due to his team and system he is in. Drew Brees was ok in San Diego, but then Payton builds a total run and gun system and Brees turns into Marino.

Remember Akili Smith.  Shit.

Another one for you...........Reid builds the entire offense to cater to Mcnabb's strengths and hide his major weakness (accuracy), leading to a borderline hall of fame career in Philly.  He gets shipped out of town and flushes any chance of being considered a great QB down the gutter..............owne d.
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: 240 is Back on January 03, 2012, 01:05:47 PM
Who would kill more zombie bottom twinks?

ron paul
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: Tre on January 04, 2012, 09:59:41 AM
RG III is a little on the small side and will probably have an injury plagued career.  Luck is a bigger version of Aaron Rodgers.  

6-2/220 vs 6-4/240

6-2 isn't exactly small, but when we're talking about the NFL, 6-4 is the more attention-getting number. 

Stanford also says more to me than a degree from Baylor, but in RG III's defense, he did graduate in 3 years while playing football at a D1 school in a major conference. 

I'm impressed with Luck's skill set, but I can't say whether he's a gamer, which is something we *did* see in Aaron Rodgers when he was at Cal.  That one-handed catch was pretty sweet, but being a great athlete and being a gamer are not one and the same. 
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: 240 is Back on January 04, 2012, 10:06:47 AM
I think they will both have solid careers.   

luck will be Eli Manning. 
RGB3 will be something like a slower Vick with much better work ethic.

I'd pick Luck, if only because of the height and pocket consistency against OK... 23 or 24? lol insane.  But you can't go wrong either way.
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: Wiggs on January 04, 2012, 10:23:20 AM
6-2/220 vs 6-4/240

6-2 isn't exactly small, but when we're talking about the NFL, 6-4 is the more attention-getting number. 

Stanford also says more to me than a degree from Baylor, but in RG III's defense, he did graduate in 3 years while playing football at a D1 school in a major conference. 

I'm impressed with Luck's skill set, but I can't say whether he's a gamer, which is something we *did* see in Aaron Rodgers when he was at Cal.  That one-handed catch was pretty sweet, but being a great athlete and being a gamer are not one and the same. 

Brees 6'0
Vick 5'11
Rodgers 6'2

Height for nfl qbs is overrated
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: AlphaMaleDawg on January 04, 2012, 10:53:12 AM
I agree completely.......Just saying Vick's arm strength is off the charts.  Been to any UD games this season AMD?

dam how did you know I went there? I guess I must have said it once.

And nope, I haven't been to any games since my senior year. I used to mainly only tailgate and then leave once the game started. They aren't very good unfortunately
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: AlphaMaleDawg on January 04, 2012, 10:57:45 AM
A quarterback ain't nothing if he is not in the right system.  How little you guys know about football.  Joe Montana is a great QB and ran the west coast perfectly.  I doubt he would have been 1/2 as good in a run and gun.  But ask Moon to play west coast and he would be lost.

Look last weekend, Matt Flynn torches the Lions.  Is he better than Rogers?  Probably not, but system is designed for a certain QB.

Jeff George had one of the strongest arms in NFL history but played in the wrong style of offense.  they wanted to run a lot of slants and short passes and the fucker threw so hard his receivers could never catch and he couldn't adapt to that system. 

Alex Smith is looking like a stud this year playing for a coach with a system that works, the last three coaches couldn't figure it out.

Tom Brady gets hurt and Matt Cassell leads them to 11-5 record, then can't do so well now. A lot of teams draft the best QB, but not the best QB for their system.  Luck won't fait well in the Indy system.  Peyton likes to make quick slant passes, run the no huddle a lot and barely airs it out and NEVER runs.  Luck is in an offense that uses the run to setup the pass at Standford where Indy just passes and runs when no one is stacked on the line.  The OKC QB would actually fit better in the Indy system as they run similar plays, where Luck would fit well in a system like Washington or Seatle.



excellent post. it's a shame that too few people realize this. and I'm talking about "experts" and others in the media as well
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: The U on January 04, 2012, 11:22:07 AM
dam how did you know I went there? I guess I must have said it once.

And nope, I haven't been to any games since my senior year. I used to mainly only tailgate and then leave once the game started. They aren't very good unfortunately

I used to post on that other site............you mentioned it over there a few times.  Unfortunately, grew up in that sesspool......luckily I escaped for college only to be sucked back in.  It's crazy how these DE hillbillies get all shitfaced and fired up to watch some Blue Hen Football. 
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: AlphaMaleDawg on January 04, 2012, 11:25:05 AM
I used to post on that other site............you mentioned it over there a few times.  Unfortunately, grew up in that sesspool......luckily I escaped for college only to be sucked back in.  It's crazy how these DE hillbillies get all shitfaced and fired up to watch some Blue Hen Football. 

pro muscle? Yea I grew up and still live in new york but I went there for four years of college. I actually loved it since I was tired of city life. I wouldn't have like living in the actual state but the university was amazing...but yea I just couldn't get into blue hen football. I went to maybe 7 games total in 4 years but rarely stayed until the end. My friends never really wanted to either. I hated standing the whole game and being drunk and not able to move. The tailgating was awesome though...I go to dewey every year for memorial day weekend and sometimes one other time. best fucking beachtown ever
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: The U on January 04, 2012, 11:33:42 AM
pro muscle? Yea I grew up and still live in new york but I went there for four years of college. I actually loved it since I was tired of city life. I wouldn't have like living in the actual state but the university was amazing...but yea I just couldn't get into blue hen football. I went to maybe 7 games total in 4 years but rarely stayed until the end. My friends never really wanted to either. I hated standing the whole game and being drunk and not able to move. The tailgating was awesome though...I go to dewey every year for memorial day weekend and sometimes one other time. best fucking beachtown ever

Good ole DB.........my second home.  Thunderdome/Trenbolona Beach Party 2012............Dewey Beach and/or Seacrets OC MD. 

You pick
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: The Abdominal Snoman on January 04, 2012, 11:34:21 AM

Luck I think will be great but he will be stuck behind peyton manning for 3-4 years probably

A lot of talk about the Colts not picking up Peyton's 28 million dollar option and just letting him walk. Peyton may be one hit away from never playing again. That is if he can even get back on the field. Peyton is an unbelievable QB but if I'm the Colts, I wouldn't risk it. Grab Luck and start the rebuilding process.
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: bike nut on January 04, 2012, 11:39:59 AM
Hopes are high on the kid after everyone watched what Cam Newton did this year.

Meanwhile.......forgetti ng about the fact that he could be another Vince Young.  ;D
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: AlphaMaleDawg on January 04, 2012, 11:48:38 AM
Good ole DB.........my second home.  Thunderdome/Trenbolona Beach Party 2012............Dewey Beach and/or Seacrets OC MD.  

You pick

yes this will be my first summer on HGH too. Now my physique will really stand out. I was 7 weeks on trenbolona last year at 50mg ed but was holding more water than i wanted due to all the high sodium foods and alcohol i was having there. Seacrets is awesome. I love northbeach during the day and the rudder at night. I like jam session too even though the line is out the ass. Too bad we have to wait so dam long for that
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: The U on January 04, 2012, 11:53:16 AM
yes this will be my first summer on HGH too. Now my physique will really stand out. I was 7 weeks on trenbolona last year at 50mg ed but was holding more water than i wanted due to all the high sodium foods and alcohol i was having there. Seacrets is awesome. I love northbeach during the day and the rudder at night. I like jam session too even though the line is out the ass. Too bad we have to wait so dam long for that

You know what's funny...........when I first started doing male beauty pageants (bodybuilding shows) I would only do shows in the middle to late Summer.  Clearly so I could attempt to wreck vagina with epic leans in Dewey all Summer long.   
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: AlphaMaleDawg on January 04, 2012, 12:34:41 PM
You know what's funny...........when I first started doing male beauty pageants (bodybuilding shows) I would only do shows in the middle to late Summer.  Clearly so I could attempt to wreck vagina with epic leans in Dewey all Summer long.   

don't be a dumbass. getting tons of pussy is dewey is far more important than winning a trophy in a male beauty pageant
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: polychronopolous on January 04, 2012, 02:12:41 PM
A lot of talk about the Colts not picking up Peyton's 28 million dollar option and just letting him walk. Peyton may be one hit away from never playing again. That is if he can even get back on the field. Peyton is an unbelievable QB but if I'm the Colts, I wouldn't risk it. Grab Luck and start the rebuilding process.

If that really is the case he needs to put his health before everything and step off the field like Troy Aikman did with all his concussion issues.


Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: King Shizzo on January 04, 2012, 03:06:45 PM
Meanwhile.......forgetting about the fact that he could be another Vince Young.  ;D
I throws the ball far too well to end up like Vince Young.
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: Tre on January 04, 2012, 03:23:32 PM
A lot of talk about the Colts not picking up Peyton's 28 million dollar option and just letting him walk. Peyton may be one hit away from never playing again. That is if he can even get back on the field. Peyton is an unbelievable QB but if I'm the Colts, I wouldn't risk it. Grab Luck and start the rebuilding process.

The word from the smarter ESPN guys is that Peyton isn't going to offer to modify the terms of his current agreement, as that's his leverage right now.  It may suck when it happens, but the Colts are going to cut Peyton instead of paying him the $28 million bonus in March. 

At that point, he becomes a free agent and assuming he passes the physical, he's going to be offered a huge, 3-year deal by a team like Washington. 

Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: Devon97 on January 04, 2012, 03:27:33 PM
RG3 is a better version of Michael Vick with a better arm, if he has even half a brain to grasp a playbook he SHOULD BE the better of the two, Luck really impressed me agaist OK State though.

Luck would have been taken 1st LAST YEAR over CAM Newton.

DAve, OSU has one of the worse defenses in NCAA lol doesnt take much to look good against them
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: El Diablo Blanco on January 04, 2012, 03:33:53 PM
The word from the smarter ESPN guys is that Peyton isn't going to offer to modify the terms of his current agreement, as that's his leverage right now.  It may suck when it happens, but the Colts are going to cut Peyton instead of paying him the $28 million bonus in March. 

At that point, he becomes a free agent and assuming he passes the physical, he's going to be offered a huge, 3-year deal by a team like Washington. 



The fact any player is due a $28 million bonus shows you how out of control athlete salaries have become.  Just sickening.  No player in any sport is worth that much money.  Most of these athletes should be getting $100K max to play a sport and they should be supplementing their income with sponsorships.  NO athlete should be making millions in salary.  none.  Such bullshit.  I work in a typical fortune 500 company.  We have one developer who is critical to a product that makes $200 million per year, just one product of many and he gets about $120k per year.  This product helps companies save billions of dollars combined a year.  The impact of this product is felt across more of the general population that what a football team can.  so how an athlete gets paid more is just a farce.
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: Irongrip400 on January 04, 2012, 04:08:27 PM
Bingo.  Teams get enamoured with the best QB in college but don't think how he would work in their system.  David Carr shouldn't have been a bust but was not given the chance.  Flacco sucks donkey nuts as a QB but has good record due to his team and system he is in. Drew Brees was ok in San Diego, but then Payton builds a total run and gun system and Brees turns into Marino.

Remember Akili Smith.  Shit.

Dude, wtf?  Flacco isn't garbage, he has more wins in his first 4 years than any QB.  And don't give me the bullshit about him having a great defense, becasue Boller, or none of those other scrubs took Baltimore to the playoffs four years in a row.  The second part that I highlighted, was becasue once Brees got away from Cam Cameron, he flourished, as will Flacco when they dump Cam this offseason and hire a real OC.
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: QuakerOats on January 04, 2012, 04:09:16 PM
A lot of talk about the Colts not picking up Peyton's 28 million dollar option and just letting him walk. Peyton may be one hit away from never playing again. That is if he can even get back on the field. Peyton is an unbelievable QB but if I'm the Colts, I wouldn't risk it. Grab Luck and start the rebuilding process.
hes a hall of famer, he needs to walk away now.
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: The Abdominal Snoman on January 04, 2012, 04:24:48 PM
The word from the smarter ESPN guys is that Peyton isn't going to offer to modify the terms of his current agreement, as that's his leverage right now.  It may suck when it happens, but the Colts are going to cut Peyton instead of paying him the $28 million bonus in March. 

At that point, he becomes a free agent and assuming he passes the physical, he's going to be offered a huge, 3-year deal by a team like Washington. 



Colts are cleaning house today. The Polians were let go. Looks like they're setting the stage to let Peyton walk. I think the stars are lining up for him to go to New York(Jets) and play in the same stadium as his brother. The NFL would love the fact that Peyton would be in Tom Brady's division while they both near the end of their careers. The marking/endorsement ideas would  be endless.
Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: JBGRAY on January 04, 2012, 04:39:11 PM
The Colts should just trade the #1 overall pick...they'd get a Kings ransom for it...and compete for a SB while Peyton still has a few good years left....let some 2nd round QB learn under Peyton.

As for RG3?  Great skillset, but this is what I see happening to him sooner than later, lol....

Title: Re: RG III vs Andy Luck
Post by: HTexan on January 04, 2012, 05:07:44 PM
Got to go with luck. Too bad is going to the colts.