Don't worry you will never have that problem :Di'm worrying from a shmoe point of view obviously you vain bastard
i hear it drives the women wild 8)
refer to my thread "what is the point of having big legs if you aren't a competitive bodybuilder"
looks like shit, hope this helps
This look is caused by not training for proportion or symmetry.
Bodybuilding is a lost art and is truly fucking dead!
ronnie coleman's legs were ideal but this is too much
(http://i.imgur.com/BVzw2.jpg)
The vastus medialus should be teardrop shape, not comma(see Arnold for teardrop shape)...and oversize adductor muscles look awkward.
We could go back to Arnie's time an see a lot of conditioning and symmetry that would never make the stage today....sadly
Ronnie Coleman syndrome.Wrong. Ronnie had calves to go with them.
(http://i.imgur.com/XNZuh.gif)
ronnie coleman's legs were ideal but this is too muchNothing is good on that guy anyways...
(http://i.imgur.com/BVzw2.jpg)
big legs are not overgrownbro,
ronnie coleman is ideal size and shape
but has to match the body
this guy has disgusting shape, just meatblocks, like andreaz munzer but bigger
and his upper body cant even begin to match
nowadays he looks a lot better i heard, legs decreased
i'm worrying from a shmoe point of view obviously you vain bastard
ronnie coleman's legs were ideal but this is too much
(http://i.imgur.com/BVzw2.jpg)
Nothing is good on that guy anyways...
I wonder who looks worst a bottom heavy guy or a top heavy guy.
a bottom heavy guy always looks like total shit imo. top heavy looks good
ronnie coleman's legs were ideal but this is too much
(http://i.imgur.com/BVzw2.jpg)
he looked good back then..come on. give the dude his props. he HAD pro football player potentialFixed ;D
i can't agree. a top heavy guy says to me that he;s lazy..that he hasn;t put in the time at the squat rack
put it this way..why is that you see the squat rack empty at the gym yet every bench is taken. the bench is comfortable. having 500lbs on your shoulders sitting down and coming back up is not.
i can't stand a tank top bodybuilder ;D
purecrap strength is either the most persistent gimmick ever or too retarded and naivewhat about the most persistent retard?
what about the most persistent retard?you said it
what about the most persistent retard?
by the end of 2012 i hope you are on some gear. i really really really really don't understand, at all. why not just 40mg of anavar? so easy and simple and you will lose less hair than you are naturally.
ronnie coleman's legs were ideal but this is too much
(http://i.imgur.com/BVzw2.jpg)
well as good as that sounds
i googled it and a lot of guys report accelerated hair loss on any hair safe steroid that doesnt make you impotent
if somebody cant walk because legs are too big it s no longer bodybuilding
münzer was absolutely max size with best quality
bigger is not better
that's a great picture but i still think his legs looked like gross lumps of meat
(http://www.fisicoculturismo.org/fotos/albums/andreas-munzer/fotos_andreas_munzer_008.jpg)
(http://www.bodybuilding.com/contest_media/1075/630/d/1995_arnold_classic_review_b1216139758.jpg)
anyways, at 200mg/wk of tren i don't notice a difference in hair loss from being natural, so man, i don't really see why you are so hesitant. it's tren and a decent amount at that, you could run var or deca and probably get less hair loss than as a natural since you will lower your bodies dht levels to nothing.
a bottom heavy guy always looks like total shit imo. top heavy looks good
platz also looked like an idiot with these legs. almost as if he had some disseaselol ;D
if somebody cant walk because legs are too big it s no longer bodybuilding(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=414625.0;attach=457169;image)
münzer was absolutely max size with best quality
bigger is not better
(http://www.bodybuilding.com/contest_media/1075/630/d/1995_arnold_classic_review_b1216139758.jpg)
jesus fucking christHe looks happy.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=414625.0;attach=457169;image)
the epitome of health.
that's like a legit 4% bodyfat
dude is literally near death in that photo hahah
jesus fucking christ
this is 0% BFBody organs.
OR DO YOU SEE ANY FAT?
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=414625.0;attach=457176;image)
Body organs.
can t be seen on stage so they don t countyes. but only a retard would claim he has "0% BF" knowing that he has about 3% in his organs.
pear body?
(http://thegreatdayofannihilation.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/1249673034020.jpg)
Lived a average life, but died as an artist
(http://thegreatdayofannihilation.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/1249673034020.jpg)
bottom heavy bodies are for women. no place in bodybuilding. like branch who has huge legs and short twigs for arms, total joke
Every overgrown body part looks like shitphilip looks great
(http://bodybuildingspy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/friends-37.jpg)
Every overgrown body part looks like shit
(http://bodybuildingspy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/friends-37.jpg)
arms, shoulders and back are never too big. 8)
philip looks great
just not as great as dexter brandon ronnie serge dennis dennis nassar kevin samir paul etc
Please don't try to compare him with all those great balanced physiques.
arms, shoulders and back are never too big. 8)
BTW, is that his wife on that picture? Looks like the next Maria Shriver :-X
well he looks great in a sleeveless shirt and trousers
Under that condition, "yes". It's the same as with tank-top Mr 'O, Dennis James...., until you notice his extreme high lats, average legs & big gut.
ronnie coleman's legs were ideal but this is too muchnice proportion to calves. ;D
(http://i.imgur.com/BVzw2.jpg)
dennis is tank top mr o, t shirt mr o, long sleeve shirt mr o, baggy pullover/hoody mr o
so much more than tank top mr o
Guy looked like a living cartoon character, esp during his peak. Imagine him with lower lats & quad sweep...
mrs Philsulina
(http://bodybuildingspy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/phil-heath.jpg)
but high lats look more extreme.......
what's good about low lats? they never have that crazy wide look
Would you complain with a Coleman or Stubs like back?
In my book, back is the most beautiful muscle group and also the most important part to develop, in case you want to look like a bodybuilder.
stubs back is disgusting
coleman has each muscle severely over developed so it works out
Wish my back looked "disgusting" like that. ::) The only serious flaw I see, is his lack of symmetry. Other than that a wide, thick and detailed back.
(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/images/2008/joel_stubbs_back_routine_b.jpg) (http://www.unleashedbeasts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/joel-stubbs.jpg)
it IS disgusting when it's relaxed
But it's not relaxed on the second pic, it's the ILS pose ;D(http://api.ning.com/files/XAlCnTHcVB32QswLYCd1cYFsYjIqYQpNYVin-j*tzi02u7hI2460cRiZxM-ThQeS/black_bodybuilder_joel_stubbs_004.jpg)
(http://api.ning.com/files/XAlCnTHcVB32QswLYCd1cYFsYjIqYQpNYVin-j*tzi02u7hI2460cRiZxM-ThQeS/black_bodybuilder_joel_stubbs_004.jpg)
(http://api.ning.com/files/XAlCnTHcVB32QswLYCd1cYFsYjIqYQpNYVin-j*tzi02u7hI2460cRiZxM-ThQeS/black_bodybuilder_joel_stubbs_004.jpg)hummm. idk. his body looks a little fishy to me. ;D
this is 0% BF
OR DO YOU SEE ANY FAT?
hesitant because if it does accelerate hairloss i'm going to be very very pissed off
it would probably not even give much gains, getbig convinced me you need obscene dosages to get any kind of gains lololol
first: it will grow back if you stop the cycle. my hair grows back once i "come off" [drop the dosage]well....
second: no, if you use low dosages essentially it will allow you to keep making dry and steady gains until you get to your natural limit
yeah i agree but 220 at 5% bodyfat is well above anyone's natural limit. running low dosages will make you look like a natural in appearance and will let you squeeze out a little bit more gains when otherwise you'd have plateaued but i think with serious training someone like PNS can keep making gains (when it looks like he stalled right now) and put on an extra 20pounds of muscle over years and years by using a tiny bit of gear.agree bro,
mrs Philsulina
(http://bodybuildingspy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/phil-heath.jpg)
first: it will grow back if you stop the cycle. my hair grows back once i "come off" [drop the dosage]
second: no, if you use low dosages essentially it will allow you to keep making dry and steady gains until you get to your natural limit
what's the point in that if you basically are at your natural limit already
agree bro,
but my experience is you want 20 pounds of muscle.... you need x amount of drugs....
personal needs differ....ofcourse
but you can not use an x amount of drugs... not increase it, and expect to keep growing....
that was my point...
everybody stalls at one point and you need to up the dose.... then after you gained some muscle you stall again... again need to up the dose.... and so on ....
and lol at a natural in appearance hehehehehe.... ;D ;D ;D ;D
what's the point in that if you basically are at your natural limit already
doesn't look like you hit your body's limit yet bro. how tall are you? there are calculators online that give you your maximum "natural" size you can achieve, for most people it's 17 inch arms and a steve reeves type of look.
people with "good genetics" really just means they respond well to low dosages of testosterone (their bodies natural production) and also weighttraining which means they hit their genetic limit easier and quicker but they won't go past it without hgh or slin.
Can anyone tell me the story behind the guy with all the knives in him. Pedo, rapist?
i am like you though, small joints and it was impossible to hit 16 inch arms naturally. it took so much blood and sweat and with steroids it was such a joke to surpass.
lol bodybuilding is such a big scam it's insaneand one more who woke up to the truth!
hard work and dedication chicken and brokli fella
well....
it's sad but.. x amount of iu's and x amount of steroids = x amount of mass...
you can not cycle light and expect to keep growing...
only so much you can do with 500 mg of test and 4 iu of hgh....
there are slight differences from person to person though....
but it works like this sadly....
mostly the hgh wich is the biggest factor in combination with slin....
5iu hgh = 220
10 iu = 230
15 iu - 240 etc etc...just an example these number but you get the idea...
offcourse steroid use increases in relation to hgh and slin use...
Lets say if I go on a bulk and use a gram of gear to reach my goal. In my cutting phase would I have to cut on a gram of gear still or could I get away with using half of that?bro this whole "bulking" idea is stupid!
I talked to aesthetics regarding this and he hinted at solidifying gains. This means it's not the best thing to go straight from a bulk to a cut cause you end up losing a lot of what you've gained. My thoughts are that if you're using gear you'll maintain to your muscle going from bulk to cut since they are meant to preserve muscle mass. I've seen this solidifying gains mentioned before by many people and I'm curious to what your thoughts are on this.
I have no idea but I assume gang related
Definitely something that happened in central/south America..all kitchen knifes.... must have pissed of a group of housewives or something lol!!!
bro this whole "bulking" idea is stupid!
an excuse to get fat usually....
if anything, with prepping for a show the bodybuilder uses more mg's! just different steroids as offseason....
always be somewhat lean!!! i am talking around 9 ,that will look great for every day and it will be easy to cut down to around 6..... then you still have water to lose and will be at a rockhard 5....
no sense in "bulking" you should grow lean!!! built quality!
about solidifying gains... that to is a myth....
a human body is NOT designed to be muscular and lean at the same time...
you are either big and bloofy or lean but a lot smaller.... the gains you make on steroids are not yours....
you lease a body, not buy it....!!!
when you go off, and absolutely off, go and see how much of your gains are solidified! lol!!
whe you go and use less, you will with time lose mass.... very simple..
every gram you gain on ped's you will eventually lose! may take some time, but you will lose it....
and now you will have a lot of comments of guys that are saying yeah but i have kept all of my muscle... lol...
well, no you have not.... you may weigh the same, but you will look diffrent... and usually they are not even completely off or have been off for just a couple of months....
90% of these guys are on trt/hrt anyway because they can't handle going off for real....
go off, really off... wait a year, year and a half.... lol.... see what happens!
most will not even enter a gym anymore because it's no fun.... ;D ;D ;D
Lets say if I go on a bulk and use a gram of gear to reach my goal. In my cutting phase would I have to cut on a gram of gear still or could I get away with using half of that?
I talked to aesthetics regarding this and he hinted at solidifying gains. This means it's not the best thing to go straight from a bulk to a cut cause you end up losing a lot of what you've gained. My thoughts are that if you're using gear you'll maintain to your muscle going from bulk to cut since they are meant to preserve muscle mass. I've seen this solidifying gains mentioned before by many people and I'm curious to what your thoughts are on this.
So if anything what you're saying is that I'll likely need more juice to cut than I did in an off season mode..right??
Unless you're a competitive bodybuilder who actually has a competition season, forget about this off-season malarkey. It's a phrase the 15%bf waddlers use to try and justify their pie consumption. If you want to look better for the beach, drop the water retaining long ester stuff, use much less test overall, up the tren / mast etc. And stop eating so many pies.
Unless you're a competitive bodybuilder who actually has a competition season, forget about this off-season malarkey. It's a phrase the 15%bf waddlers use to try and justify their pie consumption. If you want to look better for the beach, drop the water retaining long ester stuff, use much less test overall, up the tren / mast etc. And stop eating so many pies.Great post
all kitchen knifes.... must have pissed of a group of housewives or something lol!!!
poor basterd, what a way to go man.... even his nuts and face are full of knifes....
this is what I would consider "bulked" uplol!!!!!
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=372296.0;attach=409141;image)
And this is just straight up fat/outta shape
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=372296.0;attach=409132;image)
(http://i37.tinypic.com/209k934.jpg)
Can anyone tell me the story behind the guy with all the knives in him. Pedo, rapist?
I googled it... los zetas :-Xi put the pic up on my facebook...it got deleted by these pussies! lol....