Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Benny B on March 03, 2012, 07:57:55 PM
-
March 3, 2012, 6:16 pm
Limbaugh Apologizes for Attack on Student in Birth Control Furor
By BRIAN STELTER
In an about-face, the conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh said Saturday that he was sorry for denouncing as a “prostitute” a Georgetown University law student who had spoken publicly in favor of the Obama administration’s birth control policy.
On Saturday, a day after President Obama telephoned the student, Sandra Fluke, to say he stood by her in the face of personal attacks on right-wing radio, Mr. Limbaugh published the apology on his Web site.
“For over 20 years, I have illustrated the absurd with absurdity, three hours a day, five days a week. In this instance, I chose the wrong words in my analogy of the situation. I did not mean a personal attack on Ms. Fluke,” Mr. Limbaugh wrote. He then reiterated his opposition to the Obama administration policy, which requires health insurance plans to cover contraceptives for women.
On the Wednesday, Thursday and Friday editions of his talk show, Mr. Limbaugh attacked Ms. Fluke as sexually promiscuous and politically motivated — “an anti-Catholic plant,” he said at one point.
On Wednesday, he called her a “slut” who “wants to be paid to have sex”; on Thursday, he said she was “having so much sex, it’s amazing she can still walk”; and on Friday, after Senate Democrats beat back a Republican challenge to the new policy, he said Ms. Fluke had testified that she was “having sex so frequently that she can’t afford all the birth-control pills that she needs.”
In television interviews, Ms. Fluke said she was stunned and outraged by Mr. Limbaugh’s comments.
In his call on Friday, Mr. Obama thanked Ms. Fluke for publicly backing his regulations mandating contraception coverage.
Mr. Limbaugh’s comments added fuel to a rancorous dispute on Capitol Hill over whether employers should have to provide insurance coverage for contraception. Democrats have said Republican opposition to such coverage amounts to a “war on women.”
Some Republicans also criticized Mr. Limbaugh, including the House speaker, John A. Boehner, who called his comments “inappropriate.”
As the issue gained national attention, liberal activists and other longtime critics of Mr. Limbaugh started to contact his advertisers and ask them to withdraw their ads from his show. By Saturday, six advertisers, including Quicken Loans, said they had done so.
Mr. Limbaugh did not directly address the advertiser pressure in his statement Saturday, but he said, “My choice of words was not the best, and in the attempt to be humorous, I created a national stir. I sincerely apologize to Ms. Fluke for the insulting word choices.”
After the statement was published online on Saturday, the company that distributes “The Rush Limbaugh Show,” Premiere Radio Networks, also sent it to reporters in an e-mail. Premiere, a unit of Clear Channel, declined to comment.
It was immediately dismissed as a nonapology by some of the groups that have mobilized against Mr. Limbaugh. “I think this attempt at damage control labeled as an apology actually makes things worse,” stated a Twitter account called “Stop Rush,” which wants people to pressure to companies to stop advertising on “The Rush Limbaugh Show.”
The account then added, “You know what Rush’s so-called apology means? Your efforts at delivering real accountability are working! Keep at it! Onward!”
Think Progress, a blog run by the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank, noted in a post that “Limbaugh often sparks controversy, but it is exceedingly rare for him to apologize.”Lawrence O’Donnell, the MSNBC anchor, was blunt in his interpretation: “Lawyers wrote that apology,” he stated on Twitter.
Reached by telephone, Kit Carson, the chief of staff for Mr. Limbaugh, declined to comment on why the statement was issued. Mr. Carson added, if Mr. Limbaugh has more to say, he would likely do so on his radio show on Monday.
At least one conservative commentator, Dana Loesch, appeared to back Mr. Limbaugh’s original sentiments, writing on Twitter on Saturday, “If you expect me to pay higher insurance premiums to cover your ‘free’ birth control, I can call you whatever I want.”
Despite Mr. Limbaugh’s statement, one company that was planning to pull its ads, Carbonite, said it would still do so. On Facebook on Saturday evening, the company’s chief executive, David Friend, wrote, “We hope that our action, along with the other advertisers who have already withdrawn their ads, will ultimately contribute to a more civilized public discourse.”
-
Hey look everyone, it's the Counterfeit Negro "benny blanco". His fat white whale of a mother took so much black dick "benny blanco" wants to be black too!
-
(http://intensities.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/stew7.jpg)
"benny blanco"
-
March 3, 2012
Have You No Shame, Rush?
By MAUREEN DOWD
WASHINGTON
AS a woman who has been viciously slashed by Rush Limbaugh, I can tell you, it’s no fun.
At first you think, if he objects to the substance of what you’re saying, why can’t he just object to the substance of what you’re saying? Why go after you in the most personal and humiliating way?
Then, once you accept the fact that he has become the puppet master of the Republican Party by stirring bloodlust (earning enough to bribe Elton John to play at his fourth wedding), you still cringe at the thought that your mom might hear the ugly things he said.
Now he’s brutalizing a poised, wholesome-looking 30-year-old Georgetown law student as a “slut,” “a prostitute” and “round-heeled” simply for testifying to lawmakers about wanting the school to amend its health insurance to cover contraception.
Sandra Fluke “goes before a Congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex, what does that make her?” Limbaugh coarsely ranted. “It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She’s having so much sex she can’t afford the contraception. She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex. What does that make us? We’re the pimps. The johns.”
Isn’t this the last guy who should be pointing fingers and accusing others of taking pills for recreational purposes?
He said insuring contraception would represent another “welfare entitlement,” which is wrong — tax dollars would not provide the benefit, employers and insurance companies would. And women would not be getting paid just “to have sex.” They’d be getting insurance coverage toward the roughly $1,000 annual expense of trying to avoid unwanted pregnancies and abortions, and to control other health conditions. This is something men and conservatives should want too, and not just because those outcomes actually do cost taxpayers money.
Limbaugh leeringly suggested that were taxpayers to be stuck with the bill, Fluke and other “feminazis” should give them something back: sex videos. “We want you to post the videos online so we can all watch,” he said.
Fluke was lobbying Georgetown University to change its policy for three years before she became a cause célèbre outcast when the Republican congressman Darrell Issa barred her from an all-male panel on contraception. But her conflict with her Jesuit school did not stop its president, John DeGioia, from eloquently defending his student (who ended up testifying for Nancy Pelosi’s all-Democratic panel).
“She provided a model of civil discourse,” he said in a letter to the school. “This expression of conscience was in the tradition of the deepest values we share as a people. One need not agree with her substantive position to support her right to respectful free expression.”
He branded the reaction of Limbaugh and some other commentators as “misogynistic, vitriolic and a misrepresentation of the position of our student.”
Given this season’s lava spill of hate, it was fitting that DeGioia evoked St. Augustine: “Let us, on both sides, lay aside all arrogance. Let us not, on either side, claim that we have already discovered the truth.”
It’s hard to believe that not that long ago, Bob Dole, the former G.O.P. leader and presidential nominee, was a spokesman for Viagra. (Mother Jones pointed out that Rush, a Viagra fan, might be confusing the little blue pill and birth control, since “when and how much sex you have is unrelated to the amount of birth control you need.”)
Rush and Newt Gingrich can play the studs, marrying again and again until they find the perfect adoring young wife. But women pressing for health care rights are denigrated as sluts.
On Thursday, the Senate narrowly voted down a puritanical Republican attempt to let employers and insurance companies deny coverage for contraceptives on any religious or moral grounds they could dream up.
Only a last-minute media glare caused Virginia’s Republican governor, Bob McDonnell, and its Republican-led Legislature to modify a shockingly punitive law aiming to shame and in many cases penetrate women seeking abortions. The version that passed on Thursday is still harsh enough to damage McDonnell’s vice presidential prospects.
By Friday, President Obama, who had started out fumbling the contraception issue, and the Democrats were taking gleeful advantage, raising $1.6 million to combat the G.O.P.’s “war on women.”
Mitt Romney reacted to Limbaugh for days with craven silence before finally allowing on a rope line on Friday night that “it’s not the language I would have used.” Is there a right way to call a woman a slut?
Rick Santorum, whose views on women are medieval, said “an entertainer can be absurd.” Speaker John Boehner offered a tepid comment through a spokesman that Limbaugh’s words were “inappropriate.”
President Obama called Fluke and bucked her up, probably hoping to get Limbaugh to double down. El Rushbo, as he calls himself, obliged. “Did you ever think of backing off the amount of sex you’re having?” he demanded of Fluke on Friday’s broadcast as some advertisers were fleeing: Sleep Train Mattress Centers, Quicken Loans, Select Comfort and AutoZone.
The law student got the call from the president as she was about to go on Andrea Mitchell’s show on MSNBC. She darted into an empty office to talk to Obama and closed the door; soon Chris Matthews was wondering who was inside and sending a staffer to check it out.
“The president just wanted to make sure I was O.K.,” she said. “And I am O.K. I’m pretty level-headed.”
The childless radio yakker wondered snidely how Fluke’s parents, who live in rural Pennsylvania, would feel about her crusade. Fluke, a Methodist Democrat, said she was particularly touched that the president told her, speaking as the father of two daughters, that her parents should be proud.
“My parents and I don’t always agree politically,” she said, but about the issue of insuring contraception, “we see eye to eye.”
-
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0cnXYhlBk1k/SS91n8PzbOI/AAAAAAAACqk/ERbuuCmNS64/s400/mugshot+mullet.jpg)
"benny blanco"'s dad.
-
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0cnXYhlBk1k/SS91n8PzbOI/AAAAAAAACqk/ERbuuCmNS64/s400/mugshot+mullet.jpg)
"benny blanco"'s dad.
OK. We understand you're a racist.
Care to make a point?
You can start at any time.
-
March 3, 2012, 6:16 pm
Limbaugh Apologizes for Attack on Student in Birth Control Furor
By BRIAN STELTER
In an about-face, the conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh said Saturday that he was sorry for denouncing as a “prostitute” a Georgetown University law student who had spoken publicly in favor of the Obama administration’s birth control policy.
On Saturday, a day after President Obama telephoned the student, Sandra Fluke, to say he stood by her in the face of personal attacks on right-wing radio, Mr. Limbaugh published the apology on his Web site.
“For over 20 years, I have illustrated the absurd with absurdity, three hours a day, five days a week. In this instance, I chose the wrong words in my analogy of the situation. I did not mean a personal attack on Ms. Fluke,” Mr. Limbaugh wrote. He then reiterated his opposition to the Obama administration policy, which requires health insurance plans to cover contraceptives for women.
On the Wednesday, Thursday and Friday editions of his talk show, Mr. Limbaugh attacked Ms. Fluke as sexually promiscuous and politically motivated — “an anti-Catholic plant,” he said at one point.
On Wednesday, he called her a “slut” who “wants to be paid to have sex”; on Thursday, he said she was “having so much sex, it’s amazing she can still walk”; and on Friday, after Senate Democrats beat back a Republican challenge to the new policy, he said Ms. Fluke had testified that she was “having sex so frequently that she can’t afford all the birth-control pills that she needs.”
In television interviews, Ms. Fluke said she was stunned and outraged by Mr. Limbaugh’s comments.
In his call on Friday, Mr. Obama thanked Ms. Fluke for publicly backing his regulations mandating contraception coverage.
Mr. Limbaugh’s comments added fuel to a rancorous dispute on Capitol Hill over whether employers should have to provide insurance coverage for contraception. Democrats have said Republican opposition to such coverage amounts to a “war on women.”
Some Republicans also criticized Mr. Limbaugh, including the House speaker, John A. Boehner, who called his comments “inappropriate.”
As the issue gained national attention, liberal activists and other longtime critics of Mr. Limbaugh started to contact his advertisers and ask them to withdraw their ads from his show. By Saturday, six advertisers, including Quicken Loans, said they had done so.
Mr. Limbaugh did not directly address the advertiser pressure in his statement Saturday, but he said, “My choice of words was not the best, and in the attempt to be humorous, I created a national stir. I sincerely apologize to Ms. Fluke for the insulting word choices.”
After the statement was published online on Saturday, the company that distributes “The Rush Limbaugh Show,” Premiere Radio Networks, also sent it to reporters in an e-mail. Premiere, a unit of Clear Channel, declined to comment.
It was immediately dismissed as a nonapology by some of the groups that have mobilized against Mr. Limbaugh. “I think this attempt at damage control labeled as an apology actually makes things worse,” stated a Twitter account called “Stop Rush,” which wants people to pressure to companies to stop advertising on “The Rush Limbaugh Show.”
The account then added, “You know what Rush’s so-called apology means? Your efforts at delivering real accountability are working! Keep at it! Onward!”
Think Progress, a blog run by the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank, noted in a post that “Limbaugh often sparks controversy, but it is exceedingly rare for him to apologize.”Lawrence O’Donnell, the MSNBC anchor, was blunt in his interpretation: “Lawyers wrote that apology,” he stated on Twitter.
Reached by telephone, Kit Carson, the chief of staff for Mr. Limbaugh, declined to comment on why the statement was issued. Mr. Carson added, if Mr. Limbaugh has more to say, he would likely do so on his radio show on Monday.
At least one conservative commentator, Dana Loesch, appeared to back Mr. Limbaugh’s original sentiments, writing on Twitter on Saturday, “If you expect me to pay higher insurance premiums to cover your ‘free’ birth control, I can call you whatever I want.”
Despite Mr. Limbaugh’s statement, one company that was planning to pull its ads, Carbonite, said it would still do so. On Facebook on Saturday evening, the company’s chief executive, David Friend, wrote, “We hope that our action, along with the other advertisers who have already withdrawn their ads, will ultimately contribute to a more civilized public discourse.”
I looked and couldn't find any apologies from Bill Maher about Sarah Palin and her family. I wholeheartedly mean when I tell you to fuck off Benny. You seriously, next to reppingfor20, have to be the biggest america-hating racist bastard on here not to mention the dumbest Mother f**ker I've even met on this site (or any site for that matter)
-
I looked and couldn't find any apologies from Bill Maher about Sarah Palin and her family. I wholeheartedly mean when I tell you to fuck off Benny. You seriously, next to reppingfor20, have to be the biggest america-hating racist bastard on here not to mention the dumbest Mother f**ker I've even met on this site (or any site for that matter)
8) What the COACH said .
-
Condoms are cheap, the pill at planned parenthood is cheap/free. When some college student gets press time about wanting her birth control subsidized even more "SLUT" is one of the nicer terms that comes to mind
-
I looked and couldn't find any apologies from Bill Maher about Sarah Palin and her family. I wholeheartedly mean when I tell you to fuck off Benny. You seriously, next to reppingfor20, have to be the biggest america-hating racist bastard on here not to mention the dumbest Mother f**ker I've even met on this site (or any site for that matter)
I am not defending Benny B at all by replying here. As a matter of fact I think you've gone completely mad and Benny B is your black liberal split personality, a la The Dark Half by Stephen King. The scariest part is that I don't know if one is more ignorant than the other or if you just have two halves of equal ignorant value. Anyway, it doesn't matter if Maher apologized or not, that's not the point. The points is if you do or say something that is clearly wrong or inappropriate you should make amends. You don't teach your kids that being wrong is only wrong if the other person admits its wrong. Excuse me while I return to the huge tits and monster curves thread..
-
I don't like Rush Limbaugh,...but realistically, advertisers will permanently go away only if his numbers consistently slip...
-
8) What the COACH said .
The same COACH who in 2 days has started 2 threads with nearly identical posts castigating mods for deleting some thread he's interested in only to apologize shortly thereafter and say, "Ooops, I was mistaken."?
Whatev's. That guy is clueless.
-
Condoms are cheap, the pill at planned parenthood is cheap/free. When some college student gets press time about wanting her birth control subsidized even more "SLUT" is one of the nicer terms that comes to mind
Your understanding of the issue is poor (but maybe better that some other little dumbbells).
-
Update: Limbaugh has lost Carbonite....that was his last one....everyone has now pulled out. His website has a lot of blank spaces now
-
They'll all be back as soon as another famous celebrity self-destructs and this "story" is forgotten about. As syncpulse said, as long as Rush's numbers are high, advertisers won't leave him permanently.
-
They'll all be back as soon as another famous celebrity self-destructs and this "story" is forgotten about. As syncpulse said, as long as Rush's numbers are high, advertisers won't leave him permanently.
Probably true but it didn't work out so well for glen beck
-
Probably true but it didn't work out so well for glen beck
Did Glen ever have the audience Rush has? I'm really not sure one way or the other. I don't get a chance to hear much talk radio one way or the other.
-
Did Glen ever have the audience Rush has? I'm really not sure one way or the other. I don't get a chance to hear much talk radio one way or the other.
At one point Beck was either number one or number two(he is a real number two in my book)behind O'reilly at fox for a while. Probably nowhere near the audience of Rush but large numbers by cable news standards.
-
Did Glen ever have the audience Rush has? I'm really not sure one way or the other. I don't get a chance to hear much talk radio one way or the other.
Radiowise, Rush was always # 1, Beck floated around #3 - 5 in his prime.
-
That dirty slut ho bag commie rat should be mocked. rush was 100000 percent correct for attacking that whore.
-
That dirty slut ho bag commie rat should be mocked. rush was 100000 percent correct for attacking that whore.
It's disheartening to see public discourse being lowered to calling people names. It is totally unwarranted and builds more division in society. We can't afford this kind of bickering back and forth if we are ever to improve as a race.
-
It's disheartening to see public discourse being lowered to calling people names. It is totally unwarranted and builds more division in society. We can't afford this kind of bickering back and forth if we are ever to improve as a race.
she was a plant and a prop for Obama.
-
she was a plant and a prop for Obama.
I believe I read she has been active in this cause prior to the hearing. She's only a prop as far as her being attacked by Rush then consoled by Obama.. don't tell me they could have planned that.
-
It's disheartening to see public discourse being lowered to calling people names. It is totally unwarranted and builds more division in society. We can't afford this kind of bickering back and forth if we are ever to improve as a race.
Where was the same standard for President Bush, his family, his daughters, Sarah Palin and her family?
The media died in 2008, and quite frankly who cares what Limbaugh called her? She stuck her pretentious, spoiled brat nose into where it didn't belong to get some attention....so the chickens have come home to roost for the idealistic slut.
-
I believe I read she has been active in this cause prior to the hearing. She's only a prop as far as her being attacked by Rush then consoled by Obama.. don't tell me they could have planned that.
Why are we even discussing his in the first place? Guess who orchestrated this whole thing months ago?
-
Where was the same standard for President Bush, his family, his daughters, Sarah Palin and her family?
The media died in 2008, and quite frankly who cares what Limbaugh called her? She stuck her pretentious, spoiled brat nose into where it didn't belong to get some attention....so the chickens have come home to roost for the idealistic slut.
Interesting point. I'm sure I have turned a blind eye to the other side of this, part of that is cuz I haven't been politically conscious for a long time. I'm sorry I just don't agree that attacking someone with a personal vengeance like that for testifying in congress is right.
-
Interesting point. I'm sure I have turned a blind eye to the other side of this, part of that is cuz I haven't been politically conscious for a long time. I'm sorry I just don't agree that attacking someone with a personal vengeance like that for testifying in congress is right.
She is being attacked for being an idiot and a spoiled bitch w an entitlement mentality.
-
She is being attacked for being an idiot and a spoiled bitch w an entitlement mentality.
explain
-
Why are we even discussing his in the first place? Guess who orchestrated this whole thing months ago?
Where is the evidence of a conspiracy? I know your just going to attack and call me a pussy liberal but I really am looking for an answer to this question.
-
Interesting point. I'm sure I have turned a blind eye to the other side of this, part of that is cuz I haven't been politically conscious for a long time. I'm sorry I just don't agree that attacking someone with a personal vengeance like that for testifying in congress is right.
As long as the left has Maher, Madcow, The View, Chris Mathews and the like....the right will have O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Beck etc.
But if you're going to put on your big girl blouse, leave the shelter of acadaemia, and enter into an adult world with adults, don't cry when things don't go your way. Hers is a stupid argument, meant only to gain notoriety. And now the world knows she's a "whore". C'est la vie. ::)
-
Where is the evidence of a conspiracy? I know your just going to attack and call me a pussy liberal but I really am looking for an answer to this question.
Look at the timeline.
Remember a few months ago out of nowhere George S. Asked about contraception at one of the debates? Everyone was like WTF? Even the candidates were puzzled.
a few weeks after that - Obama and Sebellius announced the contraception mandate w regard to the church who it promised an exception to the mandate.
So everyone started fighting each other remember? Then , conveniently, the Fluke appears complaining about Jesuit school Georgetowns policy and having pelosi and the rest of the leftist gang show up.
now - notice how Obama tried injecting himself as a protector of women, who he needs in November?
This was all orchestrated by Obama ad the media to divert attention away from obamas failed presidency and rising energy policies.
-
She is a liberal plant. She is exactly what Rush says she is...
-
Rush Limbaugh, premier entertainer, getting his name out once again...everyone talking about him again. And the media laps it right up.
-
7th advertiser pulls out of Limbaugh's show
NEW YORK — A flower company is the seventh advertiser to pull its ads from conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh's radio program in reaction to his derogatory comments about a law student who testified about birth control policy.
ProFlowers said Sunday on its Facebook page that it has suspended advertising on Limbaugh's program because his comments about Georgetown University student Sandra Fluke "went beyond political discourse to a personal attack and do not reflect our values as a company."
The six other advertisers that say they have pulled ads from his show are mortgage lender Quicken Loans, mattress retailers Sleep Train and Sleep Number, software maker Citrix Systems Inc., online data backup service provider Carbonite and online legal document services company LegalZoom.
ProFlowers had said on Twitter that posts it received about Limbaugh's remarks affected its advertising strategy. ProFlowers is an online flower delivery service.
Limbaugh called the 30-year-old Fluke a "slut" and "prostitute" last week after she testified to congressional Democrats in support of national health care policies that would compel employers and other organizations, including her university, to offer group health insurance that covers birth control for women.
He apologized to Fluke on Saturday after being criticized by Republican and Democratic politicians and after several advertisers left the show.
Clear Channel's Premiere Radio Networks Inc. hosts Limbaugh's program, one of the country's most popular talk radio shows. The company is supporting Limbaugh, whose on-air contract with Premiere runs through 2016.
"The contraception debate is one that sparks strong emotion and opinions on both sides of the issue," Premiere Networks said in a statement emailed Sunday by spokeswoman Rachel Nelson. "We respect the right of Mr. Limbaugh, as well as the rights of those who disagree with him, to express those opinions."
Clear Channel Media and Entertainment operates more than 850 radio stations in the U.S., and Premiere says it's the largest radio content provider in the country, syndicating programs to more than 5,000 affiliate stations.
When asked which companies or organizations were the largest advertisers on Limbaugh's show, Nelson said that that information was "proprietary." Nelson didn't immediately respond Sunday to questions about how much revenue the company will lose with the advertiser defections or how much revenue Limbaugh's show brings in.
Clear Channel's parent company was taken private in 2008 by private equity firms Thomas H. Lee Partners and Bain Capital.
-
:P
-
(http://www.petemichaels.com/images/sherm1.jpg)
7th advertiser pulls out of Limbaugh's show
NEW YORK — A flower company is the seventh advertiser to pull its ads from conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh's radio program in reaction to his derogatory comments about a law student who testified about birth control policy.
ProFlowers said Sunday on its Facebook page that it has suspended advertising on Limbaugh's program because his comments about Georgetown University student Sandra Fluke "went beyond political discourse to a personal attack and do not reflect our values as a company."
The six other advertisers that say they have pulled ads from his show are mortgage lender Quicken Loans, mattress retailers Sleep Train and Sleep Number, software maker Citrix Systems Inc., online data backup service provider Carbonite and online legal document services company LegalZoom.
ProFlowers had said on Twitter that posts it received about Limbaugh's remarks affected its advertising strategy. ProFlowers is an online flower delivery service.
Limbaugh called the 30-year-old Fluke a "slut" and "prostitute" last week after she testified to congressional Democrats in support of national health care policies that would compel employers and other organizations, including her university, to offer group health insurance that covers birth control for women.
He apologized to Fluke on Saturday after being criticized by Republican and Democratic politicians and after several advertisers left the show.
Clear Channel's Premiere Radio Networks Inc. hosts Limbaugh's program, one of the country's most popular talk radio shows. The company is supporting Limbaugh, whose on-air contract with Premiere runs through 2016.
"The contraception debate is one that sparks strong emotion and opinions on both sides of the issue," Premiere Networks said in a statement emailed Sunday by spokeswoman Rachel Nelson. "We respect the right of Mr. Limbaugh, as well as the rights of those who disagree with him, to express those opinions."
Clear Channel Media and Entertainment operates more than 850 radio stations in the U.S., and Premiere says it's the largest radio content provider in the country, syndicating programs to more than 5,000 affiliate stations.
When asked which companies or organizations were the largest advertisers on Limbaugh's show, Nelson said that that information was "proprietary." Nelson didn't immediately respond Sunday to questions about how much revenue the company will lose with the advertiser defections or how much revenue Limbaugh's show brings in.
Clear Channel's parent company was taken private in 2008 by private equity firms Thomas H. Lee Partners and Bain Capital.
-
Oh the irony of posting that troll Mahr.
Fluke is a fluzy and a leftist hoe bag, perfect example of an Obama rat.
-
She is a liberal plant. She is exactly what Rush says she is...
Then why bite. If it was that obvious she was a plant why did he take the bait. Either he didn't know or he is incredibly stupid. To everyone but his die hard supporters he comes off looking like a complete jackass. Rush has been around the block before and supposedly knows how washington works; if what you say is true, he should have known better and deserves to get played. In my opinion these claims sound like an attempt to save face which doesn't really work because he was the one who fell for it.
-
Then why bite. If it was that obvious she was a plant why did he take the bait. Either he didn't know or he is incredibly stupid. To everyone but his die hard supporters he comes off looking like a complete jackass. Rush has been around the block before and supposedly knows how washington works; if what you say is true, he should have known better and deserves to get played. In my opinion these claims sound like an attempt to save face which doesn't really work because he was the one who fell for it.
But it was ok for Maher and the rest of the left loons to call all the conservative women whatever they want? Rush made a mistake but that doesn't get him off the hook. He should have known better honestly.
-
But it was ok for Maher and the rest of the left loons to call all the conservative women whatever they want? Rush made a mistake but that doesn't get him off the hook. He should have known better honestly.
who said it was OK
Maher is actually a comedian unlike Rush and he doesn't have advertisers also unlike Rush
Also, Maher is on a cable channel and if people are upset some comment he made about Palin they are free to boycott HBO or cancel it or whatever they want
what's stopping them?
-
But it was ok for Maher and the rest of the left loons to call all the conservative women whatever they want? Rush made a mistake but that doesn't get him off the hook. He should have known better honestly.
I'm wasn't arguing for maher. That has nothing to do with what I said.
-
It appears that Rush just recently picked up a new sponsor by the name of Tax Resolution Services (TRS)
-
Is it true that one of the sponsors who left tried to come back only to be rejected by Rush? Maybe its just me but it seems as though this contrversy is fading.
-
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/03/gross-axelrod-says-bill-mahers-tw-t-and-c-nt-language-different-than-limbaughs-words-video/ (http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/03/gross-axelrod-says-bill-mahers-tw-t-and-c-nt-language-different-than-limbaughs-words-video/)
-
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/03/gross-axelrod-says-bill-mahers-tw-t-and-c-nt-language-different-than-limbaughs-words-video/ (http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/03/gross-axelrod-says-bill-mahers-tw-t-and-c-nt-language-different-than-limbaughs-words-video/)
So Obama's campaign manager excuses Maher's remarks against Palin and Bachman because they are public figures but Rush's remarks were wrong because Fluke is not a public figure.
You can't make this up if you tried.
-
So Obama's campaign manager excuses Maher's remarks against Palin and Bachman because they are public figures but Rush's remarks were wrong because Fluke is not a public figure.
You can't make this up if you tried.
You dont have to if you are an obama drone since it doesnt matter. The typical leftist does not give a damn, its communism or bust at all costs.
-
Of course, lost in all of this is that the Media Matters report is BOGUS. The list they used was comprised mostly of companies that weren't airing ads on Rush's show, in the first place.
Premiere Source: 98 Advertisers Not Targeting Hannity, Beck, Levin
Reports this weekend that as many as 98 major advertisers are asking not to air their ads on conservative radio shows are "totally bogus," a source close to Premiere Networks told Newsmax Sunday night.
Premiere Networks syndicates top-rated shows like those hosted by Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin and Glenn Beck.
This past weekend, news reports on sites like Politico and the Huffington Post are suggesting that as many as 98 major brands and major businesses are asking that their ads not run on such conservative talk programs. The reports suggest the advertisers are taking the action in the wake of comments made by Rush Limbaugh about a female Georgetown law student.
"The fact is that these advertisers, with a few exceptions, have never been advertising on Premiere's conservative shows," the source said.
It is well known that major companies and brands often shun both conservative and liberal shows and outlets, as Madison Avenue advertising firms keep "do not buy" lists of programs they believe may upset their client's customers.
"Most of these 98 firms don't air on liberal MSNBC or radio shows like Ed Schultz's. There is nothing new here," the source said.
Why the controversy then?
Last Friday, Radio-info.com published an internal Premiere memo it said offered a list of 98 companies that did not want to air on conservative talk shows.
According to Radio-info, the list of advertisers include "carmakers (Ford, GM, Toyota), insurance companies (Allstate, Geico, Prudential, State Farm) and restaurants (McDonald’s, Subway)."
"These companies for the most part never advertise on Rush, Hannity and other conservative talk shows," the source said, adding, "And they usually don't advertise on liberal shows either."
The Premiere memo being cited actually is just a reminder to stations of long-standing policy telling their ad traffic managers not to fill unsold ads in conservative talk radio programs with such brand advertisers.
"The media is trying to create the impression -- one being propagated by the liberal Media Matters -- that there is mass movement against conservative shows," the source said. "But it simply isn't true."
The source also told Newsmax that several major advertisers who have dropped Rush have already indicated to Premiere they plan to come back on his show, and other Premiere shows like Hannity and Levin have seen strong ad revenue growth.
An excerpt of the Premiere memo follows:
“To all Traffic Managers: The information below applies to your Premiere Radio Networks commercial inventory. More than 350 different advertisers sponsor the programs and services provided to your station on a barter basis. Like advertisers that purchase commercials on your radio station from your sales staff, our sponsors communicate specific rotations, daypart preferences and advertising environments they prefer… They’ve specifically asked that you schedule their commercials in dayparts or programs free of content that you know are deemed to be offensive or controversial (for example, Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh, Tom Leykis, Michael Savage, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity). Those are defined as environments likely to stir negative sentiment from a very small percentage of the listening public.”
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/limbaugh-advertiser-ban-levin/2012/03/11/id/432105
As if that weren't enough, Media Matters cited some advertisers, who stated point-blank that they did NOT ask their ads to be pulled from Rush's show.
Amex denies being part of conservative radio boycott
I have been suspicious of the hype regarding the Rush boycott and the numbers of advertisers dropping Rush touted by Media Matters and others. The numbers seem inflated for the purpose of creating momentum, as many of the advertisers being listed as “dropping” Rush never even advertised with him.
Of particular note was a list of 98 advertisers obtained by Media Matters which allegedly had instructed Premiere Newtorks to avoid Rush and several other high-profile conservative talk show programs. That listed included American Express.
I reached out to Amex before my post yesterday about how certain advertisers were avoiding conservative talk radio but not Gawker. Amex never responded to my request, but did respond to a reader complaint resulting from my post.
I followed up with the public relations person at Amex who had communicated with the reader, and she confirmed both that Amex never instructed Permiere Networks to avoid running Amex ads on conservative talk radio, and that Amex has “no position” on the Limbaugh boycott.
Here is the exchange of emails:
From me:
I run a politics and law blog and have been following the Rush Limbaugh advertiser boycott story. I posted the other day about the inclusion of American Express on a list of advertisers who have instructed Premiere Networks not to run Amex ads on the Rush Limbaugh show and the shows of several other conservative talk radio hosts.
I previously contacted Amex for confirmation of its policy, but received no response. I was hoping that you could explain Amex’s position on the following: (1) Did Amex instruct Premiere Networks not to run Amex ads on the shows of several conservative talk radio hosts as outlined in this memo? (2) What is Amex’s position as to Amex ads being run on the Rush Limbaugh show?
I would appreciate your prompt response so that I can update my readers.
Amex Response:
Thank you for your note, and I apologize because your previous email did not make its way to me, but I appreciate you reaching out again. I want to clarify that at no time did American Express or our media buying agencies send a letter to Premiere Radio Networks or its parent company, Clear Channel Communications, providing any direction concerning adverting placements, and specifically related to conservative radio programming. Since we were alerted to this situation yesterday, we have reached out to our media partners to correct any miscommunication and reconfirm that that they are not limiting the placement of our advertisements.
My follow up:
Thank you. What is Amex’s position as to advertising specifically on the Limbaugh show?
Amex’s further response:
We do not have a position on the Limbaugh Show.
If Amex denies being part of either a conservative radio or Limbaugh boycott, one has to question the validity of many of the lists being created of boycotters.
A lot of what is going on is hype by Media Matters and others to make the boycott seem worse than it is to inspire continued efforts. That’s not to say that the boycott has not had an effect, it’s just don’t believe all the numbers being thrown around.
http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/03/amex-denies-being-part-of-conservative-radio-boycott/
-
Is it true that one of the sponsors who left tried to come back only to be rejected by Rush? Maybe its just me but it seems as though this contrversy is fading.
Yes. That was Sleep Train.
-
Yes. That was Sleep Train.
And carbonite
-
And carbonite
Carbonite tried to come back? I wasn't aware of that one. I knew their stocks tanked and their Facebook page was being FLAMED by Rush supporters, who have dropped Carbonite (especially when learning that the company still sponsors Ed Schultz, who called Laura Ingraham a "slut", less than a year ago).
Here is an article about Sleep Train.
Rush Limbaugh rejects Sleep Train's offer to resume partnership
First it was Sleep Train Mattress Centers that spurned its longtime ally and business partner Rush Limbaugh.
Now Limbaugh is returning the favor — and the split between the Sacramento retailer and the controversial radio host appears to be permanent.
Limbaugh on Thursday rejected Sleep Train's offer to resume advertising on his national radio show and rehire Limbaugh as a paid spokesman. Limbaugh's spokesman said the conservative commentator would no longer carry Sleep Train's ads "in the future."
Sleep Train stopped advertising on the show last Friday, becoming one of the first sponsors to drop Limbaugh. The company's decision came two days after Limbaugh called a Georgetown University law student a "slut" and a "prostitute" over her stance on health insurance coverage for contraception.
Limbaugh apologized to the student over the weekend.
Sleep Train's decision was especially noteworthy because Limbaugh and Sleep Train chief executive Dale Carlsen have known each other since the 1980s, when Sleep Train was a small company and Limbaugh was an on-air personality at Sacramento's KFBK (1530 AM).
"As a diverse company, Sleep Train does not condone such negative comments directed toward any person," the mattress retailer said last week.
The statement said "we have currently pulled our ads," hinting the stoppage might be just temporary.
But the rift deepened Thursday, maybe for good.
Limbaugh's spokesman Brian Glicklich sent Carlsen an email rejecting Sleep Train's efforts to make peace. The email noted that Sleep Train asked Limbaugh to resume his "voiced endorsement" in which he personally read the ad copy on the air.
"Rush received your requests personally," said Glicklich's email, which was released to The Bee and other media. "Unfortunately, your public comments were not well received by our audience, and did not accurately portray either Rush Limbaugh's character or the intent of his remarks. Thus, we regret to inform you that Rush will be unable to endorse Sleep Train in the future.
"Rush appreciates your long friendship and your past support, and we wish you good luck in the future."
Carlsen couldn't be reached for comment but said in a prepared statement: "We confirm that Rush Limbaugh will no longer be one of Sleep Train's radio endorsers."
Although he apologized to law student Sandra Fluke, Limbaugh has downplayed the impact of losing advertisers.
"Two of the sponsors who have canceled have asked to return," he told his audience Wednesday, according to a transcript on his website. "We are being very careful about that. Not gonna give you any names here. One of them is practically begging to come back. Everything is fine on the business side."
Eric Dezenhall, a public relations executive in Washington who consults with companies facing crises, said Limbaugh's rejection could hurt Sleep Train.
"It throws a haymaker at them that leaves them in the news longer than they would have anticipated," he said. "It extends the half-life of the controversy, which is always problematic."
The company seemed to try to dial down the issue.
It put a message on its Facebook page Thursday afternoon saying, "Out of respect for fans who do not wish to be part of the Rush Limbaugh discourse, we are turning posts off."
That message disappeared about an hour later.
Dezenhall called Limbaugh's move "a very calculated risk," designed to warn other advertisers that they shouldn't drop him.
Carlsen hired Limbaugh to read his radio ads back in 1986, when Sleep Train owned just two stores and Limbaugh was trying to kickstart a not-so-successful radio career.
"He started doing the spots and it took off right away," Carlsen told The Bee in 1997.
The relationship with Sleep Train continued after Limbaugh moved to New York and became one of the biggest stars in radio. In a 2005 interview with The Bee, Carlsen recalled what Limbaugh told him as he was moving to New York.
"When he left town he said, 'The people you meet on the way up are the people you meet on the way down. I'll always take care of you.'
http://www.sacbee.com/2012/03/09/4324006/rush-limbaugh-rejects-sleep-trains.html
-
And carbonite
Again, I don't think it's Carbonite. From listening to the "Best of Rush Limbaugh" show, the other sponsor that left but came back (or, at least, tried to) is Tax Resolution Services.
-
So, according to the media, a woman that is attending Georgetown Law school(probably not cheap) having so much sex that she demands the public pay for her contraceptives is not a slut?
While a woman who has been married to the same man for 24 years is a slut?
What?
Oh, and we get it Benny B.....you hate white people.
-
So, according to the media, a woman that is attending Georgetown Law school(probably not cheap) having so much sex that she demands the public pay for her contraceptives is not a slut?
While a woman who has been married to the same man for 24 years is a slut?
What?
Oh, and we get it Benny B.....you hate white people.
Tuition at Georgetown is at least $50,000 a year.
$3000 over three years for birth control? That's roughly $85 per month. Has she NOT heard of the free clinic (or a part-time JOB)?
Maybe she should get Anita Dunn to buy her rubbers and pills for her.
As for the left's nth attempt to get Rush yanked, thus far, it's been discovered that:
- Media Matters is really driving this, not some grass-roots outrage from the public-at-large.
- Most of the companies Media Matters cited weren't sponsoring Limbaugh's show, from the get-go.
- Media Matters FALSELY listed companies that didn't ask for its ads to withdraw.
- Some on that list, as Rush stated two weeks ago, have returned or attempted to return.
- So far, the NY Times claims that ClearChannel/Premiere Networks lost less than $2 million, some of which has been recouped.
- Rush has at least three news sponsors.
Is it safe to say that the rumors of Limbaugh's demise have been greatly exaggerated?
-
Is it safe to say that the rumors of Limbaugh's demise have been greatly exaggerated?
no, butt it is wishful thinking!