Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Soul Crusher on July 29, 2012, 05:52:32 PM
-
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/240909-dem-lawmakers-to-unveil-bill-regulating-online-sale-of-ammo
Fucking commies. Would it have been better had he gotten everything from dicks or wal mart?
-
next week's news:
online sales of ammo shoot up 7000%
-
He didn't even fire off a hundred rounds so what's the justification in their heads? All he would have had to do is buy 100. And you're right, he could have just went down and picked them up at any of several locations in his area.
-
He didn't even fire off a hundred rounds so what's the justification in their heads? All he would have had to do is buy 100. And you're right, he could have just went down and picked them up at any of several locations in his area.
Idiotic overreaction.
Next thing will be them monitoring the amount of ammunition you can buy, just like they did with Pseudoephedrine during their Meth witchhunt.
-
This is know as death by a thousand cuts (regulations), they can't overtly go after the second amendment, so they do this bullshit.
-
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/240909-dem-lawmakers-to-unveil-bill-regulating-online-sale-of-ammo
Fucking commies. Would it have been better had he gotten everything from dicks or wal mart?
Panic reaction
Always happen after something like this
-
Panic reaction
Always happen after something like this
sucking up to their base. intro'ing a bill they konw the repubs will reject.
You'll see the people doing it are those in very liberal districts, beholden to their donors/base.
it's like the repubs intro'ing 46 abortion bills, knowing obama would crush everyone if they made it to him (senate cockblocking them first of course).
We know 46 bills on abortion are nothing but sucking up to base, but we're okay with it, right?
-
Ahhh the moral equivilency argument, cudos cracker jack.
Apparently this bill woult not simply regulate online sales but effectively ban them.
It would require that ppl show photo ID at the time of purchase making online purchases effectively banned.
pretty shitty of the dems and obama to support this...at least we know where obama stands now, right cracker jack?
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/white-house-gives-cool-welcome-bill-restricting-online-182934423.html?_esi=1
"It requires ammunition buyers who are not licensed dealers to present photo identification at the time of purchase, effectively banning the online or mail order purchase of ammo by regular civilians."
-
Ahhh the moral equivilency argument, cudos cracker jack.
Apparently this bill woult not simply regulate online sales but effectively ban them.
It would require that ppl show photo ID at the time of purchase making online purchases effectively banned.
pretty shitty of the dems and obama to support this...at least we know where obama stands now, right cracker jack?
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/white-house-gives-cool-welcome-bill-restricting-online-182934423.html?_esi=1
"It requires ammunition buyers who are not licensed dealers to present photo identification at the time of purchase, effectively banning the online or mail order purchase of ammo by regular civilians."
I called it, just like the Pseudoephedrine during the meth witch hunt, trying to monitor ammo sales using your ID.
-
good
-
good
Typical
-
Typical
Bullets should be regulated just like weapons....what's the big deal???
-
Bullets should be regulated just like weapons....what's the big deal???
What about people who just want to shoot fun?
-
Bullets should be regulated just like weapons....what's the big deal???
What if you dont have a photo ID Vince?
I mean youre for having to show photo ID for ammo but not for voting?
FUCKING REALLY YOU MORON!!!!
-
Ahhh the moral equivilency argument, cudos cracker jack.
Apparently this bill woult not simply regulate online sales but effectively ban them.
It would require that ppl show photo ID at the time of purchase making online purchases effectively banned.
pretty shitty of the dems and obama to support this...at least we know where obama stands now, right cracker jack?
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/white-house-gives-cool-welcome-bill-restricting-online-182934423.html?_esi=1
"It requires ammunition buyers who are not licensed dealers to present photo identification at the time of purchase, effectively banning the online or mail order purchase of ammo by regular civilians."
Obama supports this bill? Can you show where? Everywhere I look, it says he's highly unlikely to support it and I can't find anywhere where it says he supports it like you just did.
-
Fuck this shit... The only the I can say the Republicans WON'T do is talk Guns... Goddam stupid pieces of Democrat shit.
-
Fuck this shit... The only the I can say the Republicans WON'T do is talk Guns... Goddam stupid pieces of Democrat shit.
all this guy would have had to have done is to go to Dicks or Gander Mt or Wal Mart.
it's beyond embarrassing how uninformed these politicians are.
-
all this guy would have had to have done is to go to Dicks or Gander Mt or Wal Mart.
it's beyond embarrassing how uninformed these politicians are.
Oh, they know... They just want to pander.
The problem is that you don't pander about constitutional rights... If you say you can take away guns, then you can take away other rights.
They've already suspended Habeas Corpus where they can and to keep that right gone, they will have to take away our guns... A reckoning is at hand it seems.
-
Obama supports this bill? Can you show where? Everywhere I look, it says he's highly unlikely to support it and I can't find anywhere where it says he supports it like you just did.
I apologize I read in haste, it is said they will evaluate the legislation.
I dont know where you read he is unlikely to support it, He has talked out both sides of his mouth on this issue par for the course for obama but maybe youve only read the one side.
-
I apologize I read in haste, it is said they will evaluate the legislation.
I dont know where you read he is unlikely to support it, He has talked out both sides of his mouth on this issue par for the course for obama but maybe youve only read the one side.
I've read several opinions from different sources that he is unlikely to support it. Nice trying to turn this into my fault when I was just trying to see if he had actually voiced support for this bill as you said.
-
obama ain't touching guns. romney, despite his record, probably won't either. It's a non-issue.
Sure, you will have people saying things or introducing something they know will fail - but that' sjust to rally their base and get donations.
I mean, 46 abortion bills, the GOP knew they'd all die in teh Senate/POTUS. But they just keep on entering them. So they can say "Look, Mr. Smith, I TRIED to stop abortion. 46 times. Both those Dem Senators..."
THis is all just posturing. No gun rights will change.
-
I've read several opinions from different sources that he is unlikely to support it. Nice trying to turn this into my fault when I was just trying to see if he had actually voiced support for this bill as you said.
Im not trying to spin this, he has talked out both sides of his mouth.
and as I have said it was a mistake he has not endorsed this...Im not opposed to owning up to my mistakes. I know that quality is rare around here with all the deflection and spin but dont confuse me with those shit heads please.
-
obama ain't touching guns. romney, despite his record, probably won't either. It's a non-issue.
Sure, you will have people saying things or introducing something they know will fail - but that' sjust to rally their base and get donations.
I mean, 46 abortion bills, the GOP knew they'd all die in teh Senate/POTUS. But they just keep on entering them. So they can say "Look, Mr. Smith, I TRIED to stop abortion. 46 times. Both those Dem Senators..."
THis is all just posturing. No gun rights will change.
first of quit with the moral equivilency bull shit, funny how you never draw those comparisons when you condemn the reps for not focusing on the issues ::)
2nd this bill might actually have some backing if it didnt go so far as to basically ban all online/mail order sales of ammo.
-
Im not trying to spin this, he has talked out both sides of his mouth.
and as I have said it was a mistake he has not endorsed this...Im not opposed to owning up to my mistakes. I know that quality is rare around here with all the deflection and spin but dont confuse me with those shit heads please.
I didn't say you tried to spin this. You blamed me when I was just trying to find out if he had actually came out for this bill which is what you stated. I'm just saying don't point your finger at me for asking a valid question based on what you said.
" but maybe youve only read the one side."
-
Why is it the Dems dont view this as an attack on the rights of individuals?
they are all for ppl having to show ID for ammo but not to vote, does that sound reasonable to anybody here?
-
I didn't say you tried to spin this. You blamed me when I was just trying to find out if he had actually came out for this bill which is what you stated. I'm just saying don't point your finger at me for asking a valid question based on what you said.
I appologize if I came across as attacking you that wasnt my intention, I am geniuenly curious where you read he was unlikely to support this though.
I felt my question was just as valid as yours, you asked me to validate my assertion and I did the same to you.
I wasnt trying to be a dick.
-
Why is it the Dems dont view this as an attack on the rights of individuals?
they are all for ppl having to show ID for ammo but not to vote, does that sound reasonable to anybody here?
No... both are equally important rights in this great nation and neither should be infringed in ANY way.
-
I appologize if I came across as attacking you that wasnt my intention, I am geniuenly curious where you read he was unlikely to support this though.
I felt my question was just as valid as yours, you asked me to validate my assertion and I did the same to you.
I wasnt trying to be a dick.
It's been mentioned in quite a few things I've read or watched. Even the article posted by 3333 in the first post touches on it.
"Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said last week that he does not intend to bring gun control legislation to the floor and President Obama has been reluctant to press lawmakers to act on the issue in an election year."
-
What if you dont have a photo ID Vince?
I mean youre for having to show photo ID for ammo but not for voting?
FUCKING REALLY YOU MORON!!!!
No, you don't have to show id for ammo....you can in fact buy tons of it online without any identification you jackass.
Funny thing is that there's never been anyone killed from voting....except of course from the people that were surpressing the vote..... ::)
-
No, you don't have to show id for ammo....you can in fact buy tons of it online without any identification you jackass.
Funny thing is that there's never been anyone killed from voting....except of course from the people that were surpressing the vote..... ::)
And when was the last time a gun or a bullet went out on its own and killed someone? This is what I'm talking about, penalize the law abiding citizen as knee jerk reaction, when in reality a gun is a tool.
-
And when was the last time a gun or a bullet went out on its own and killed someone? This is what I'm talking about, penalize the law abiding citizen as knee jerk reaction, when in reality a gun is a tool.
There are a number of things you can do with ammo to kill someone without the need of a gun.... ::)
-
There are a number of things you can do with ammo to kill someone without the need of a gun.... ::)
Jesus Christ......
-
There are a number of things you can do with ammo to kill someone without the need of a gun.... ::)
Or you could use a knife or a bat, should we regulate those as well assclown? Get a fucking clue
-
Or you could use a knife or a bat, should we regulate those as well assclown? Get a fucking clue
That's not a bad idea regulating bats and knives.
-
That's not a bad idea regulating bats and knives.
The best idea would be to regulate your fucking stupidity. I think I am going to write my congressman and see if he will sponsor regulations on you
-
There are a number of things you can do with ammo to kill someone without the need of a gun.... ::)
Hey idiot - go try to fire one of those bullets out of the airsoft rifle.
-
Time to regulate sales of hammers. 3333, when are you getting your concealed hammer permit?
Hammer attack on tourist
By LARRY CELONA, DOUG AUER and BETH DEFALCO
Last Updated: 7:38 AM, July 31, 2012
Posted: 1:59 AM, July 31, 2012
Share on emailShare on facebook More Sharing ServicesMore Print A hammer-wielding madman — dressed in a suit and tie — bashed in the skull of a Spanish tourist who was sitting quietly with his wife on a bench in City Hall Park yesterday, police sources said.
Witnesses said the crazed man looked normal — until he walked up to Hugo Alejandro, 31, of Barcelona and cracked him repeatedly in the temple with the hammer’s claw end — just one inch above his left eye.
Before striking him, the wacko screamed out profanities, calling his victim a “Nazi motherf- - ker’’ and shouted out his views on President Obama and former President Bill Clinton.
Alejandro was rushed to Bellevue Hospital with a fractured skull shortly after 3 p.m. He was listed in stable condition last night.
His alleged attacker was identified as John Charles Yoos, 43, from Flatlands, Brooklyn, according to sources.
A group of good Samaritans held Yoos until others pointed out the violent suspect to an off-duty NYPD officer who was working a security job at a bank across the street.
The cop held him until reinforcements arrived at the scene. Cops said they also found a knife in his jacket pocket.
He was charged with assault, reckless endangerment and weapons possession.
Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/hammer_attack_on_tourist_hrxXS1XMoS0EYxnPqNQFKI#ixzz22D5V9oj9
-
NYC is rapidly going back to the bad old days.
The thugs are getting more brazen.
Time to regulate sales of hammers. 3333, when are you getting your concealed hammer carrying permit?
Hammer attack on tourist
By LARRY CELONA, DOUG AUER and BETH DEFALCO
Last Updated: 7:38 AM, July 31, 2012
Posted: 1:59 AM, July 31, 2012
Share on emailShare on facebook More Sharing ServicesMore Print A hammer-wielding madman — dressed in a suit and tie — bashed in the skull of a Spanish tourist who was sitting quietly with his wife on a bench in City Hall Park yesterday, police sources said.
Witnesses said the crazed man looked normal — until he walked up to Hugo Alejandro, 31, of Barcelona and cracked him repeatedly in the temple with the hammer’s claw end — just one inch above his left eye.
Before striking him, the wacko screamed out profanities, calling his victim a “Nazi motherf- - ker’’ and shouted out his views on President Obama and former President Bill Clinton.
Alejandro was rushed to Bellevue Hospital with a fractured skull shortly after 3 p.m. He was listed in stable condition last night.
His alleged attacker was identified as John Charles Yoos, 43, from Flatlands, Brooklyn, according to sources.
A group of good Samaritans held Yoos until others pointed out the violent suspect to an off-duty NYPD officer who was working a security job at a bank across the street.
The cop held him until reinforcements arrived at the scene. Cops said they also found a knife in his jacket pocket.
He was charged with assault, reckless endangerment and weapons possession.
Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/hammer_attack_on_tourist_hrxXS1XMoS0EYxnPqNQFKI#ixzz22D5V9oj9
-
33, a group of onlookers held the bad guy til police arrived. Do you admire their bravery?
-
33, a group of onlookers held the bad guy til police arrived. Do you admire their bravery?
They should have beat the fucker like he stole something
-
There are a number of things you can do with ammo to kill someone without the need of a gun.... ::)
like what Vince?
-
They should have beat the fucker like he stole something
Not in NYC. Hell fucking no.
Here you get sent to the Tombs for 4 days if you do that.
-
like what Vince?
I suppose you could pry off the tip of lead and empty all of the gun powder into a big box and turn it into a bomb.
Should only take you 3-4 years to make something that could actually blow up more than a finger.
-
I suppose you could pry off the tip of lead and empty all of the gun powder into a big box and turn it into a bomb.
Should only take you 3-4 years to make something that could actually blow up more than a finger.
would be more effective to do the fertilizer thing, maybe we should ban that as well?
sound like a plan vince?
-
would be more effective to do the fertilizer thing, maybe we should ban that as well?
sound like a plan vince?
You can't tie a fuse to a few sacks of fertilizer so no. If you even search for "fertilizer to make bombs" online, the FBI will know about it very quickly.
-
:)
Should be regulate gasoline purchases and bottles and rags?
You can't tie a fuse to a few sacks of fertilizer so no. If you even search for "fertilizer to make bombs" online, the FBI will know about it very quickly.
-
You can't tie a fuse to a few sacks of fertilizer so no. If you even search for "fertilizer to make bombs" online, the FBI will know about it very quickly.
Vince, do you feel that the FBI is going to come find you because you type "fertilizer to make bombs"?
I don't think that's a very valid assumption.
Lots of people search on how to do it... They just don't do it.