Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Method101 on December 05, 2012, 01:03:20 PM
-
Read this article but be ready to puke, I saw this posted on another forum and thought I would put it here as well:
Heres the start of it;
If there's one thing I'm always going to remember about the 2012 election, it's that it was the moment I first saw the white male monopoly lose its vise-grip on American culture.
http://jezebel.com/5965429/oh-god-please-dont-let-white-male-victimhood-be-the-next-big-social-movement?utm_source=gawker.com&utm_medium=recirculation&utm_campaign=recirculation&post=54881686
This is a video from the writers youtube channel. No wonder this fat fucker hates white men, it looks like she had to settle for this ugly fucker because no white man would put up with her.
-
(http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/187chganqv1mjjpg/original.jpg)
-
you looking jacked right here method101
-
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=450537.0;attach=494881)
-
you looking jacked right here method101
Cute bicep on that chick.
-
Cute bicep on that chick.
It doesn't look like she even lifts.
-
you looking jacked right here method101
Post that 3 year old photo all day because I am happy with how I looked in it given how long I had been training at that time. BigMC, Brad and Tre however are still afraid to post a single picture. Funny how you laugh at drug users then criticize someone who is obviously natural, I guess I should have expected nothing better from the peanut gallery. Knooger is an obvious gimmick account of Bigmc who has a problem with me because hes an N word.
;D
-
Epic work from Picasso
(http://oi45.tinypic.com/vymx4.jpg)
-
Incredible how a reactionary movement to inequality commits the same sins as those they oppose.
-
Incredible how a reactionary movement to inequality commits the same sins as those they oppose.
X2
They objectify other human beings as they themselves have been objectified but with self-righteous indignation. Humans never learn from their mistakes.
-
Two serious responses in a row, that most be some kind of record on getbig these days.
-
Good luck with the whole equality thing. It doesn't work in practice.
We are different. Embrace the differences and let folks specialize.
This whole "there shouldn't be a monopoly on opportunities" thing is bullshit leftist agenda that completely overlooks the role nature has to play in a person's phenotype, performance, intelligence, etc...
There is discrimination when it comes to opportunity. The strongest survive. The weakest die. Those most suited to the activity excel at it - it's called comparative advantage and it's as real as it gets.
Levelling the playing field is a socialist movement and I rail against that.
Do I think women should be oppressed and raped and murdered? Nope...I love women. But I think there are things men can do that women simply can't do as well, on average. Can the average woman be considered as equally qualified to act as a firefighter? No. She's not as strong, as fast, or as apt to undertake risky activity that could threaten one's life (the "scourge" of testosterone that's so villified in society) as her male counterpart. There are women who can do it, no doubt. But we can't assume that 50% of jobs as firefighters should go to women, simply because women are 50% of the population.
On the flip side, there tons of jobs to which women are better suited than men. Female marketers tend to be more successful than men, at least when it comes to productivity, an intuition to consumer behavior, and EQ. Men are far too inward-looking and apply too many biases to understand different target market behaviors, on average. So does that mean that men can't be marketers? No. It's just that we are born with certain talents that can't always be overcome with nature, and should be used to society's fullest potential. Drawing arbitrary lines is to ignore our genetic make-up.
Let's take it a step further. Should we create equality in the Olympics? Hey, whites make up about 70% or so of the American populace. It's not fair that the US Men's track team isn't at least 70% white males.
And let's do away with "women's" sports and "men's sports". 50% of all NFL teams should be female, regardless of talent.
It's a slippery slope.
And that article is a piece of trash. It humiliates and marginalizes men and belittles their feelings towards things. Haven't women learned what that feels like? Or is this a thinly veiled piece of retributive journalism from an angry Andrea Dworkin clone?
By the way, I refuse to let anyone label me. Women can kiss my ass if they think I'll fit some mold. So too can men, blacks, whites, gays, heteros, punks, mods, jocks, geeks, whatever...I'm my own man. I think we all are.
Refuse to be labelled.
I reject the feminist cause. Just as I reject the movement that would keep white males as superiors.
Folks just need to get along and do their own thing and stop bitching. Imaging how much more productive we'd all be if we stopped complaining, pissing, and moaning about who got what and who didn't get theirs.
These people bitch more about unfairness than my kids whine about bedtime and who gets to stay up later. I guess we never, really grow up do we?
-
Good luck with the whole equality thing. It doesn't work in practice.
We are different. Embrace the differences and let folks specialize.
This whole "there shouldn't be a monopoly on opportunities" thing is bullshit leftist agenda that completely overlooks the role nature has to play in a person's phenotype, performance, intelligence, etc...
There is discrimination when it comes to opportunity. The strongest survive. The weakest die. Those most suited to the activity excel at it - it's called comparative advantage and it's as real as it gets.
Levelling the playing field is a socialist movement and I rail against that.
Do I think women should be oppressed and raped and murdered? Nope...I love women. But I think there are things men can do that women simply can't do as well, on average. Can the average woman be considered as equally qualified to act as a firefighter? No. She's not as strong, as fast, or as apt to undertake risky activity that could threaten one's life (the "scourge" of testosterone that's so villified in society) as her male counterpart. There are women who can do it, no doubt. But we can't assume that 50% of jobs as firefighters should go to women, simply because women are 50% of the population.
On the flip side, there tons of jobs to which women are better suited than men. Female marketers tend to be more successful than men, at least when it comes to productivity, an intuition to consumer behavior, and EQ. Men are far too inward-looking and apply too many biases to understand different target market behaviors, on average. So does that mean that men can't be marketers? No. It's just that we are born with certain talents that can't always be overcome with nature, and should be used to society's fullest potential. Drawing arbitrary lines is to ignore our genetic make-up.
Let's take it a step further. Should we create equality in the Olympics? Hey, whites make up about 70% or so of the American populace. It's not fair that the US Men's track team isn't at least 70% white males.
And let's do away with "women's" sports and "men's sports". 50% of all NFL teams should be female, regardless of talent.
It's a slippery slope.
And that article is a piece of trash. It humiliates and marginalizes men and belittles their feelings towards things. Haven't women learned what that feels like? Or is this a thinly veiled piece of retributive journalism from an angry Andrea Dworkin clone?
By the way, I refuse to let anyone label me. Women can kiss my ass if they think I'll fit some mold. So too can men, blacks, whites, gays, heteros, punks, mods, jocks, geeks, whatever...I'm my own man. I think we all are.
Refuse to be labelled.
I reject the feminist cause. Just as I reject the movement that would keep white males as superiors.
Folks just need to get along and do their own thing and stop bitching. Imaging how much more productive we'd all be if we stopped complaining, pissing, and moaning about who got what and who didn't get theirs.
These people bitch more about unfairness than my kids whine about bedtime and who gets to stay up later. I guess we never, really grow up do we?
Don't look, now, but you've entered uberman territory. ;D
-
LOL, "Jezebel".
-
Welcome to communism.
-
There is discrimination when it comes to opportunity. The strongest survive. The weakest die. Those most suited to the activity excel at it - it's called comparative advantage and it's as real as it gets.
Wrong... it's the FITTEST that survives...correct quote is survival of the FITTEST...not the "strongest".
You ve confused mottos written on bodybuilding t shirts with darwin 's original quote it seems.
BTW, most recent studies found out that men are evolving to be more attractive because mating with more partners increases the chance of reproductive success for a man".
-
X2
They objectify other human beings as they themselves have been objectified but with self-righteous indignation. Humans never learn from their mistakes.
the victim/bullied often becomes the oppressor/bully.
-
the victim/bullied often becomes the oppressor/bully.
And that is why the cycle of hate, oppression and discrimination will continue on forever.
-
the victim/bullied often becomes the oppressor/bully.
Israel on line one, Parker.
-
Israel on line one, Parker.
;)
And that is why the cycle of hate, oppression and discrimination will continue on forever.
yep, so the re-makes continue, just with a different theme.
-
Look at the bright side whitey's.
Soon all the brownies will impregnate your white women and the country will all be one big shade of tan.
-
Look at the bright side whitey's.
Soon all the brownies will impregnate your white women and the country will all be one big shade of tan.
They'll just find something else to kill and hate each other over. Nothing will change.
-
They'll just find something else to kill and hate each other over. Nothing will change.
colorism, just like in Brazil.
-
Would it be considered oppressive of me to ask her to cease and desist using 99.9999% of technology out today since close to 99.9999% of it was created and developed by white males?!
sounds fair to me
the hello kitty mousepad I think is the 1 think chix can claim technically
-
colorism, just like in Brazil.
Haiti has a history of it as well. I'm exhausted by it all. Humans can't have nice things.
-
Nano technology is really going to throw a wrench in the spokes of all this anyways
-
It's funny, because "the white male monopoly" only has a vise-grip on American culture because they invented culture.
-
Wrong... it's the FITTEST that survives...correct quote is survival of the FITTEST...not the "strongest".
You ve confused mottos written on bodybuilding t shirts with darwin 's original quote it seems.
BTW, most recent studies found out that men are evolving to be more attractive because mating with more partners increases the chance of reproductive success for a man".
Jesus christ on a cracker uberman. I know it's 'survival of the fittest'. Thanks for pointing out my misquote.
Actually, I knew you'd be the only guy to read my rant. So thanks.
And that's not a recent trend for men making themselves more attractive. It's always been like that.
And men aren't "evolving" to do it. That takes millennia, as you know. So I'll just take this time to point out the flaws in your post.
Goose, and gander.
;D
-
Don't look, now, but you've entered uberman territory. ;D
You're right. I think I'll take the next play off, sit the bench for bit, and go over my "fathers and sons" notes.
;D
-
(http://a4.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/63/ae9a384130664108850676548afd99f2/l.jpg)
Erin Stern turned down JewBecca cold. Now, she is running around with Afro-Pumps. What you think about this one, Yogi (Ron). She got a brown man on her mind.
(http://a3.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/86/052ba9bd194149b29f413ebbe8e509c6/l.jpg)
-
-
Interesting video.
Now, why are men seeking out a constant state of arousal?
Is it testosterone at play that basically hardwires our brains to like this?
Is it the changing social roles of women in today's society that, inherently, changes a man's role in society, thus changing the rules of the game?
I think it's both. We want women. We want women to want us. We want to be men (the way men have evolved over millennia as physical powerful people). And we want women to be the women we've come to believe women should be (soft, supportive, beautiful, faithful, dutiful, etc...).
Except now that's all changing. Women are more manly than ever. And men are forced to re-evaluate gender roles. Only problem is, physiology doesn't evolve in lock-step with society. In time, but certainly not now.
The result? Men want what they want, and if women won't live up to the expectations, then we'll find a produced version of women we can more easily digest (i.e. porn). At the end of the day, the porn women do for us what real women have, in the last few decades, stopped doing for us. What adds to the confusion is that amateur/homemade porn has put the women we want right on our doorstep, presented in a way we find pleasing. It's near impossible to resist. She's no longer made up and obviously fake. She can literally be your next door neighbor taking her clothes off for you. And she's sending those signals you want to see/hear...all you have to do is tune in and tune regular women out.
The inevitable conclusion? Women everywhere will grow increasingly frustrated with the fact that the men they want can't be found (too busy looking at porn for women they want). Women aren't stupid...they'll go where the men are. Which means more women doing amateur porn in the hopes of luring in a man, or at least trying out different internet personas trying to ply their wares into an online relationship where at least men will talk to them. Problem is, we're now forced to bare our most base desires on the web to each other, for all of the corporate world and big brother to watch, record, and note.
What an interesting web we all weave....
NOTE: Erin Stern (above) fits my idea of a woman (but only on the internet, where I don't have to interact with her).
-
^This
-
(http://a4.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/63/ae9a384130664108850676548afd99f2/l.jpg)
Erin Stern turned down JewBecca cold. Now, she is running around with Afro-Pumps. What you think about this one, Yogi (Ron). She got a brown man on her mind.
(http://a3.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/86/052ba9bd194149b29f413ebbe8e509c6/l.jpg)
I encourage all Jews to mix with blacks. In fact, this should become mandatory. Jews shall only mate with blacks. Those that don't will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the Law! LOL!
-
Read this article but be ready to puke, I saw this posted on another forum and thought I would put it here as well:
Heres the start of it;
http://jezebel.com/5965429/oh-god-please-dont-let-white-male-victimhood-be-the-next-big-social-movement?utm_source=gawker.com&utm_medium=recirculation&utm_campaign=recirculation&post=54881686
This is a video from the writers youtube channel. No wonder this fat fucker hates white men, it looks like she had to settle for this ugly fucker because no white man would put up with her.
Method101 seems awfully concerned by the "end of men". ;D