Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Al Doggity on December 18, 2012, 02:01:59 PM
-
We know that the Arizona Tech shooter had an extensive history of mental problems and managed to purchase guns without any problem.
We know that the Newtown shooter obtained his guns from his mother, with whom he lived. According to whichever report you choose to believe, he was mentally troubled and his mother was afraid to leave him alone.
We know that the Aurora shooter purchased 5-6 guns over the course of two months, while simultaneously purchasing a veritable military-grade stockpile of ammunition and body armor.
-
That they all found ways to acquire firearms regardless of the legalities of situations? ::)
-
That they all found ways to acquire firearms regardless of the legalities of situations? ::)
None of them purchased their guns illegally.
-
None of them purchased their guns illegally.
One of them didn't even purchase a firearm, so I have no idea where you're going with this.
-
One of them didn't even purchase a firearm, so I have no idea where you're going with this.
Yes, I figured that.
When you look at these three cases, all of which have been touchstones for gun control debate, do you honestly not see ways in which things can be done better?
For instance, in the case of the Aurora shooting? You don't see any obvious red flags?
-
They were all intent on fulfilling their mission?
-
Yes, I figured that.
When you look at these three cases, all of which have been touchstones for gun control debate, do you honestly not see ways in which things can be done better?
For instance, in the case of the Aurora shooting? You don't see any obvious red flags?
That we need to be more vigilante in identifying people with possible mental issues that could cause them to go on and commit an atrocity?
-
That we need to be more vigilante in identifying people with possible mental issues that could cause them to go on and commit an atrocity?
There's a suggestion. What do you think that entails?
-
It entails gun control.
-
It entails gun control.
Meaning what exactly?
-
It entails gun control.
There are already laws relating to the sale of firearms to the mentally ill. So I don't know what your point is again.
-
There are already laws relating to the sale of firearms to the mentally ill. So I don't know what your point is again.
exactly
-
Meaning what exactly?
Meaning intelligent gun control is something everyone should be in favor of. .
-
There are already laws relating to the sale of firearms to the mentally ill. So I don't know what your point is again.
The Aurora shooter wasn't officially considered mentally unstable before the shooting.
-
The Aurora shooter wasn't officially considered mentally unstable before the shooting.
This is part of the problem.
Please tell me what laws you would be in favor of and how they would stop the isolated incidents you are using to push them.
-
This is part of the problem.
Please tell me what laws you would be in favor of and how they would stop the isolated incidents you are using to push them.
I think you might be having trouble with the word "isolated", too. ;)
But, yep, this is the point I"m getting at. It's a problem. A real problem. Not an imaginary problem or a political problem. And it's not limited to mentally unstable people. Gun violence is a real issue.
-
I think you might be having trouble with the word "isolated", too. ;)
But, yep, this is the point I"m getting at. It's a problem. A real problem. Not an imaginary problem or a political problem. And it's not limited to mentally unstable people. Gun violence is a real issue.
How you got from Aurora shooter wasn't properly diagnosed -> Gun violence is a real issue is beyond me.
Maybe we should focus on enforcing the existing laws and worry about the PEOPLE getting them, rather than the guns themselves and the ensuing violence after they have already acquired them.
Treat the problem, not the symptom goddammit. If someone had done something about the mental condition these people, this never would have happened. And there was plenty of clues that both of them were on the edge of lunacy. Hell it came out now that this kids mother was considering having him committed.
-
I'd love to know if the shooter was on any anti-depressants.
-
I think you might be having trouble with the word "isolated", too. ;)
But, yep, this is the point I"m getting at. It's a problem. A real problem. Not an imaginary problem or a political problem. And it's not limited to mentally unstable people. Gun violence is a real issue.
who is arguing that gun violence isnt an issue?
the problem you seem to miss is that guns are not inherintly bad. Gun violence is an expression of a problem not THE PROBLEM!!!
You really think these wack jobs wouldnt find other ways to inflict pain and cause death without guns?
You really think the only reason that radical muslims are dangerous is b/c they have weapons?
or is it their mindset? their lack of common decency?
taking away the guns wont stop shit like this from happening it will simply transform it b/c youre not addressing the problem.
-
I think you might be having trouble with the word "isolated", too. ;)
But, yep, this is the point I"m getting at. It's a problem. A real problem. Not an imaginary problem or a political problem. And it's not limited to mentally unstable people. Gun violence is a real issue.
Gun Violence has been declining and is certainly not at its highest point according to the historical record.
-
Meaning intelligent gun control is something everyone should be in favor of. .
What specific intelligent gun control measures do you think would have prevented the Connecticut massacre?
-
What specific intelligent gun control measures do you think would have prevented the Connecticut massacre?
He cant and wont answer that question...
-
What specific intelligent gun control measures do you think would have prevented the Connecticut massacre?
The kid being diagnosed and locked up in an asylum. :D
Which isn't really gun control at all.
-
What specific intelligent gun control measures do you think would have prevented the Connecticut massacre?
Whether of not the son had been diagnosed with any mental problems (the information Shockwave mentioned isn't really reliable) is still a matter of debate, but one would be limiting gun access to those with severe mental problems living in their household.
-
Whether of not the son had been diagnosed with any mental problems (the information Shockwave mentioned isn't really reliable) is still a matter of debate, but one would be limiting gun access to those with severe mental problems living in their household.
That would be extremely tough to enforce I think.
-
The kid being diagnosed and locked up in an asylum. :D
Which isn't really gun control at all.
True. That's more of a mental health issue.
-
Whether of not the son had been diagnosed with any mental problems (the information Shockwave mentioned isn't really reliable) is still a matter of debate, but one would be limiting gun access to those with severe mental problems living in their household.
I think guns should be treated like driver's licenses: easy to get, you need a permit, there should be some training (at least for handguns). So, I can see an argument for ensuring people are competent before they can access guns. But regulating the household of a person with no mental illnesses? Sounds pretty tough to enforce.
Also, what's the difference between a person with severe mental problems and a young kid living in the house?
-
I think guns should be treated like driver's licenses: easy to get, you need a permit, there should be some training (at least for handguns). So, I can see an argument for ensuring people are competent before they can access guns. But regulating the household of a person with no mental illnesses? Sounds pretty tough to enforce.
Also, what's the difference between a person with severe mental problems and a young kid living in the house?
Most psychosis manifests itself through violent behaviour. I don't think that's true of youth in general.
-
Most psychosis manifests itself through violent behaviour. I don't think that's true of youth in general.
I don't know if that's true or not, but let's assume it is. A nine-year-old having access to guns is still pretty dangerous.
Are you talking about precluding someone from owning guns or from keeping them in their house if they have a person living with them who has a severe mental disability?
-
I don't know if that's true or not, but let's assume it is. A nine-year-old having access to guns is still pretty dangerous.
Are you talking about precluding someone from owning guns or from keeping them in their house if they have a person living with them who has a severe mental disability?
A nine-year old with a gun can be dangerous, but children I don't remember any nine- year olds going on shooting rampages.
-
A nine-year old with a gun can be dangerous, but children I don't remember any nine- year olds going on shooting rampages.
You've never heard of kids killing people with guns? I've never looked at the statistics, but there are probably more people who have been shot, either intentionally or accidentally, by kids than people with a severe mental illness who went on a shooting rampage.
-
You've never heard of kids killing people with guns? I've never looked at the statistics, but there are probably more people who have been shot, either intentionally or accidentally, by kids than people with a severe mental illness who went on a shooting rampage.
Exactly!
Kids kill people. That why we need to make sure all the other kids is armed so they can protect themselves.
More guns is the answer.
-
You've never heard of kids killing people with guns? I've never looked at the statistics, but there are probably more people who have been shot, either intentionally or accidentally, by kids than people with a severe mental illness who went on a shooting rampage.
That isn't what I meant- just that most of the spree killers have been older. But you're right, statistics would probably show that more kids kill. So maybe that's an argument for stronger gun control measures in regards to children.
-
That isn't what I meant- just that most of the spree killers have been older. But you're right, statistics would probably show that more kids kill. So maybe that's an argument for stronger gun control measures in regards to children.
It's actually an argument that trying to restrict a competent, lawful gun owner from possessing guns in their own home, based on who lives with them, is problematic.
-
It's actually an argument that trying to restrict a competent, lawful gun owner from possessing guns in their own home, based on who lives with them, is problematic.
Tomato, to-mah-to.