Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: anabolichalo on December 28, 2012, 03:19:18 PM

Title: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: anabolichalo on December 28, 2012, 03:19:18 PM
evolution
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: Dr Dutch on December 28, 2012, 04:29:18 PM
evolution
anabolicoli, go home... >:(
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: anabolichalo on December 28, 2012, 04:29:51 PM
anabolicoli, go home... >:(
i am home you cheesehead
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: Immortal_Technique on December 28, 2012, 05:34:19 PM
Haha
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 28, 2012, 06:44:35 PM
shakes head.....
bob chick.. and dennis james
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: el numero uno on December 28, 2012, 08:05:50 PM
evolution
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=453285.0;attach=497996;image)

How can someone build up so much muscle? (no homo)
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 28, 2012, 08:23:26 PM
shakes head.....
bob chick.. and dennis james

9-17-11
Dennis James: Phil Heath Looked Best of All Time; Better Than Flex, Ronnie
  :-X
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: SF1900 on December 28, 2012, 08:25:44 PM
Even though ronnie is contest ready and phil looks more offseason, ronnie totally dwarfs him
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: Anglo on December 29, 2012, 03:13:15 AM
What's with the tapeworm neck on Philip
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: IronMeister on December 29, 2012, 03:24:06 AM
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2740/4368735634_89e5d61045.jpg)
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: Tito24 on December 29, 2012, 03:26:17 AM
bob chick and dennis james should be shot military style for these remarks. what a bunch of retards.
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: erics on December 29, 2012, 03:47:01 AM
Don't fall for this.

Having a good physique doesn't mean you have to have the greatest physique ever.

And anyway, Ronnie Coleman only had a good physique for a few years. In the latter half of his 'reign' he was a bloated sack who seemed to be working on making it worse.

So far, Phil Heath hasn't ruined his physique.
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: Anglo on December 29, 2012, 05:11:12 AM
Don't fall for this.

Having a good physique doesn't mean you have to have the greatest physique ever.

And anyway, Ronnie Coleman only had a good physique for a few years. In the latter half of his 'reign' he was a bloated sack who seemed to be working on making it worse.

So far, Phil Heath hasn't ruined his physique.

Hi Rimjob
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: Skeletor on December 29, 2012, 05:14:04 AM
bob chick and dennis james should be shot military style for these remarks. what a bunch of retards.

What did they say?
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 29, 2012, 05:15:33 AM
9-17-11
Dennis James: Phil Heath Looked Best of All Time; Better Than Flex, Ronnie
  :-X
Bodybuilders are so fickle
Short list of bbers Phil
Will never look better than IMO
Cormier
Kevin
Flex
Shawn
Yates
Coleman
Nasser
That's off the top of my head

Dennis James especially chats so much shit
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: Skeletor on December 29, 2012, 05:17:19 AM
Bodybuilders are so fickle
Short list of bbers Phil
Will never look better than IMO
Cormier
Kevin
Flex
Shawn
Yates
Coleman
Nasser
That's off the top of my head

Dennis James especially chats so much shit

:o Wow.
Does DJ have any beef with Ronnie is is he just friends with Heath?
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 29, 2012, 05:27:12 AM
Throw dexter in there too
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: OTHstrong on December 29, 2012, 05:34:48 AM
Don't fall for this.

Having a good physique doesn't mean you have to have the greatest physique ever.

And anyway, Ronnie Coleman only had a good physique for a few years. In the latter half of his 'reign' he was a bloated sack who seemed to be working on making it worse.

So far, Phil Heath hasn't ruined his physique.
No IFBB judge on the planet would take Phil`s best over any one of the 8 versions Ronnie displayed on the Olympia stage. Phil may have a lot of people saying he looks better but from an opinion and preference point of view, certainly not from an IFBB judging point of view.
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 29, 2012, 06:20:21 AM
No IFBB judge on the planet would take Phil`s best over any one of the 8 versions Ronnie displayed on the Olympia stage. Phil may have a lot of people saying he looks better but from an opinion and preference point of view, certainly not from an IFBB judging point of view.
No one says Phil is better 99.9% of people with eyesight can see Ronnie is waaay better.... I've seen Phil in person ... Not that impressive as other pros I've seen and he was in a vest... Look past the arms... In person too the lack of width there is no hiding that....
His onstage conditioning great ... Good muscle shape
 
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: erics on December 29, 2012, 01:02:06 PM
Ronnie was a beast but he looked like garbage during the latter half.

His first couple of Olympias were incredible. Of course he would beat Heath. Even a fool who believes in Zeus can see that.

And so? Heath hasn't screwed over his physique yet. He looks good. Ronnie did screw his physique over by trying to get bigger. Heath hasn't made that mistake yet. Anyone who doesn't make that mistake is a 'better bodybuilder' than Coleman.

Only alpha males who dream of gorilla positioning don't understand that it doesn't matter if Phil Heath is not 'the greatest ever'.
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: DroppingPlates on December 29, 2012, 01:03:52 PM
anabolicoli, go home... >:(

C'mon aardappeleter, be nice to him
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: affeman on December 29, 2012, 01:05:09 PM
How can someone build up so much muscle? (no homo)

steroids?
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: Wiggs on December 29, 2012, 01:08:43 PM
Ronnie was just absolutely insane. The importance of genetics and pharmacology.
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: DroppingPlates on December 29, 2012, 01:08:58 PM
steroids?

Amazing :o
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: Trapper_Slapper on December 29, 2012, 01:09:31 PM
evolution
(http://www.dumpaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/GO-HOME-YOURE-DRUNK.jpg)
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 29, 2012, 02:04:18 PM
No one says Phil is better 99.9% of people with eyesight can see Ronnie is waaay better.... I've seen Phil in person ... Not that impressive as other pros I've seen and he was in a vest... Look past the arms... In person too the lack of width there is no hiding that....
His onstage conditioning great ... Good muscle shape
 

King Ron has spoken

Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: erics on December 29, 2012, 02:22:44 PM
No doubt.

Would be good if he could get over it though.
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: SF1900 on December 29, 2012, 02:26:24 PM
(http://s018.radikal.ru/i523/1212/31/41896b582c2f.jpg)
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: affeman on December 29, 2012, 02:29:06 PM
King Ron has spoken



Quote
I dont care what Ronnie says bc hes not a credible

 ??? ???
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 29, 2012, 02:31:05 PM
??? ???

Neo said that
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: affeman on December 29, 2012, 02:32:02 PM
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-uAX7txIObLs/UIKi5D4JpLI/AAAAAAAAK40/XEQ9yLfz_9w/s1600/mr+olympiausa+%285%29.jpg)
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: DroppingPlates on December 29, 2012, 02:35:34 PM
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-uAX7txIObLs/UIKi5D4JpLI/AAAAAAAAK40/XEQ9yLfz_9w/s1600/mr+olympiausa+%285%29.jpg)

Phil got owned in every muscle fiber
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: anabolichalo on December 29, 2012, 02:37:15 PM
Phil got owned in every muscle fiber
i think philip has better calves
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: DroppingPlates on December 29, 2012, 02:51:13 PM
i think philip has better calves

While being flexed yes, but else not so much.
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: erics on December 29, 2012, 02:55:42 PM
Phil's back looks better balanced (Ronnie's traps dominate too much) because of the way he does the pose.

In anycase, you don't have to be better than a retired bodybuilder to win. You only have to be better than who competes on the same stage with you.

If Ronnie had kept up his 1998 and 1999 form he would probaby still be winning Olympias.
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 29, 2012, 03:04:02 PM
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-uAX7txIObLs/UIKi5D4JpLI/AAAAAAAAK40/XEQ9yLfz_9w/s1600/mr+olympiausa+%285%29.jpg)

Scaling in that sucks
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: SF1900 on December 29, 2012, 03:06:01 PM
Coleman >Heath
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-wfqYwRXjsTk/UIKdG15rVEI/AAAAAAAAK4E/1tcGnNiHsoE/s1600/mr+olympiausa.jpg)
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: BILL ANVIL on December 29, 2012, 04:43:59 PM
seen Heath in person i didnt even do a double take like I do when i usually see someone huge.
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: erics on December 29, 2012, 05:35:17 PM
seen Heath in person i didnt even do a double take like I do when i usually see someone huge.

I saw him in person too and like you, I didn't do a double take either.

But that is not an argument for how good or bad his (or any other) physique is.
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: BILL ANVIL on December 29, 2012, 05:56:06 PM
I saw him in person too and like you, I didn't do a double take either.

But that is not an argument for how good or bad his (or any other) physique is.

well it counts for something but I just dont know what. it does show hes missing something crucial.
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: Yev33 on December 29, 2012, 06:03:45 PM
Phil may be the best BB'er today, but it's ludicrous to say he is the best ever. He can't hang with Coleman or Yates on muscularity, and he can't touch a '93 Flex on symmetry and aesthetics.
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: flinstones1 on December 29, 2012, 06:29:11 PM
seen Heath in person i didnt even do a double take like I do when i usually see someone huge.

Ive heard numerous people say this. blows my mind how the Mr. O cant even turn heads..... Is it just because he's so narrow? 
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: BILL ANVIL on December 30, 2012, 12:19:14 AM
Ive heard numerous people say this. blows my mind how the Mr. O cant even turn heads..... Is it just because he's so narrow? 

lack of width i guess, structure, density. supposed to be a colossal biblical like figure and when i see him its like, 'meh' just not my idea of impressive or deserving of a sandow. jmo. any idea on this mr. o's chest size?
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: OTHstrong on December 30, 2012, 06:06:14 AM
No one says Phil is better 99.9% of people with eyesight can see Ronnie is waaay better.... I've seen Phil in person ... Not that impressive as other pros I've seen and he was in a vest... Look past the arms... In person too the lack of width there is no hiding that....
His onstage conditioning great ... Good muscle shape
 
Why would I write that if no one is saying that? erics is saying that (pay attention), he is saying that Phil would beat the later verions of Ronnie like the 04 and 05 version where and I quote  `bloated sack`and `garbage``
 he used to describe Ronnie`s physique
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: OTHstrong on December 30, 2012, 06:14:21 AM
Ive heard numerous people say this. blows my mind how the Mr. O cant even turn heads..... Is it just because he's so narrow? 
He has a face that looks very young and the clothes he wears are all loose fitting and of course he has a narrow structure. When you see him with his clothes on, it`s true you are not impressed, but role up you sleeve and his right beside each other and you will feel like you never worked out a day in your life.

Also when he takes of his shirt, it is like WTF how can a human look like that, oh he turns head then alright, it is mind bogglings, his proportion are insane and makes you feel like he is plastic or something that is how freaky he is in real life with his shirt off, so freaky in fact he looks like he is 300lb, unbelievable how much his muscles just hangs off the bone, trust me Heath is a freak of nature to anyone who knows bodybuilding.
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: Dr Dutch on December 31, 2012, 12:37:21 PM
C'mon aardappeleter, be nice to him
(http://deijsvogel.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/aardappeleters.jpg)
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: erics on December 31, 2012, 01:02:35 PM
Why would I write that if no one is saying that? erics is saying that (pay attention), he is saying that Phil would beat the later verions of Ronnie like the 04 and 05 version where and I quote  `bloated sack`and `garbage``
 he used to describe Ronnie`s physique

That's not what I said so let me clarify.

The current Phil Heath SHOULD beat the latter version of Ronnie because Ronnie BECAME a bloated sack and looked like garbage.

But that doesn't mean he would beat him because for a while now the judges seem to have prefered garbage.

Now, to clarify that statement further let me say this:

Phil Heath has yet to ruin his physique the way Ronnie Coleman did. If he does ruin it, then he will also deserve to be labelled a bloated sack and garbage.

Judges and fans should never reward bodybuilders who, by trying to get bigger and bigger, make themselves look worse and worse.

That is my opinion and the standard that I hold to when 'judging' bodybuilders.

Hope that helps.
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: OTHstrong on December 31, 2012, 01:06:21 PM
OH my bad, so you still agree that the judges would still give the nod to Ronnie in 05 over a prime Heath?
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: erics on December 31, 2012, 01:14:13 PM
OH my bad, so you still agree that the judges would still give the nod to Ronnie in 05 over a prime Heath?

Judges are capable of anything.
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: OTHstrong on December 31, 2012, 01:21:40 PM
True but although Ronnie did look worse in 04 and 05, he still was the best physique on those days.
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: erics on December 31, 2012, 01:28:52 PM
True but although Ronnie did look worse in 04 and 05, he still was the best physique on those days.

A sad endictment then on the state of bodybuilding.
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: arce1988 on March 07, 2013, 06:00:33 PM
(http://i56.tinypic.com/23jgvnm.jpg)
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: hipolito mejia on March 08, 2013, 05:26:46 AM
How can someone build up so much muscle? (no homo)

BSN  Supps?   Maybe?
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: falco on March 08, 2013, 06:28:38 AM
Phil has a lot of potential but Ronnie was a mutato. They are imcomparable.
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: Ronnie Rep on March 08, 2013, 06:29:32 AM
Heath should not even be compared to Ronnie! Maybe after Phil wins 2 more Olympias then we can discuss it!
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: Kim Jong Bob on March 08, 2013, 06:30:06 AM
Dennis did write on his fb not long ago that ronnie is the greatest ever.
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: Wiggs on March 08, 2013, 09:31:43 AM
How long will it be before Phil starts getting to big for his britches and saying he should be considered one of the best all time?
Title: Re: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding
Post by: Papper on March 08, 2013, 12:27:35 PM
How long will it be before Phil starts getting to big for his britches and saying he should be considered one of the best all time?

Feels like he could say it tomorrow.