Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Necrosis on May 13, 2013, 07:01:41 AM
-
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/david/gates-benghazi-obsessed-republicans-have-car
pretty much sums up the retardation.
-
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/david/gates-benghazi-obsessed-republicans-have-car
pretty much sums up the retardation.
You need to change the title.
The word "Reality" will turn off the rightwing nutjobs.
-
Stop. Do not take this from them. They need something to whine about Obama for.
-
Bump for the right wingers on here? Why is it that when presented with counter-information the threads are empty while a thread about Obama being a Kenyan is discussed like it is actually worthy of discussion.
-
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/david/gates-benghazi-obsessed-republicans-have-car
pretty much sums up the retardation.
Hicks who was there on the ground testified otherwise and more are coming forward.
Additionally - gates is full of shit since they did not know at the time they gave the stand down order how long the attack was going to last.
But for the 2 SEALS all 40 would have been killed and that ghetto commuinist sewer rat would have been sleeping dreaming o chooming w Jay z the next day./
-
Hicks who was there on the ground testified otherwise and more are coming forward.
Additionally - gates is full of shit since they did not know at the time they gave the stand down order how long the attack was going to last.
But for the 2 SEALS all 40 would have been killed and that ghetto commuinist sewer rat would have been sleeping dreaming o chooming w Jay z the next day./
Hicks did not testify otherwise, post the quote liar.
no one gave a stand down order, jesus.
life goes on.more people die in the fake wars then that daily you are frantically making this an issue.
-
Hicks did not testify otherwise, post the quote liar.
no one gave a stand down order, jesus.
life goes on.more people die in the fake wars then that daily you are frantically making this an issue.
Reality, facts and logic do not apply to whiners.
-
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/david/gates-benghazi-obsessed-republicans-have-car
pretty much sums up the retardation.
Absurd. He is so full of crap. We have service members, including SEALs and special ops folks all over the friggin Middle East. They are ready to fly on notice of an hour or less. Of course we could have gotten help to those defenseless Americans.
-
Absurd. He is so full of crap. We have service members, including SEALs and special ops folks all over the friggin Middle East. They are ready to fly on notice of an hour or less. Of course we could have gotten help to those defenseless Americans.
They had no idea how long the attack was going to last and sent no one at all.
They didnt even TRY and but for the two SEALs, all 40 would have been dead.
Obama deserves jail for life over this.
-
Hicks did not testify otherwise, post the quote liar.
no one gave a stand down order, jesus.
life goes on.more people die in the fake wars then that daily you are frantically making this an issue.
O Rly? How do you spin this?
-
They had no idea how long the attack was going to last and sent no one at all.
They didnt even TRY and but for the two SEALs, all 40 would have been dead.
Obama deserves jail for life over this.
I agree with your first point. They should have sent help. The military's job is to go into harm's way, especially if they going to protect defenseless Americans.
I'm not on the impeachment or jail bandwagon yet.
-
O Rly? How do you spin this?
he is talking about the airport, not the embassy you nitwit ,how can you not understand what is said?
No were did it indicate Obama had involvement.
What is there to spin?
-
I agree with your first point. They should have sent help. The military's job is to go into harm's way, especially if they going to protect defenseless Americans.
I'm not on the impeachment or jail bandwagon yet.
what world do you live in? the military does not function like this, they had little to no intelligence, risking more lives for the lives of a few when you don't have any idea of what may occur, the severity and numerous other variables seems stupid. How many military rescues were there in the bush era, how many beach bum?
I think this man knows more about the military then you.
-
Impeach. WTF is there any other conversatoin going on?????????????
-
I'm not on the impeachment or jail bandwagon yet.
How can you not be? I dont get it. 7 hours notice and obama was watching on closed-circuit? And blaming it on a video?
Impeaching a prez over hiding a BJ, but this isn't worthy? I dont get it? ???
-
he is talking about the airport, not the embassy you nitwit ,how can you not understand what is said?
No were did it indicate Obama had involvement.
What is there to spin?
You said no stand down order was given. He just confirmed the order was given.
I never said Obama gave the order. We don't know that yet.
And they were on their way to Benghazi.
-
what world do you live in? the military does not function like this, they had little to no intelligence, risking more lives for the lives of a few when you don't have any idea of what may occur, the severity and numerous other variables seems stupid. How many military rescues were there in the bush era, how many beach bum?
I think this man knows more about the military then you.
BS. Like I said, we have people all over the ME. They had no idea whether the attack would last one hour or twenty-four hours. Every operation involving hostile fire puts lives in danger, and the men and women who serve are willing to put themselves in harm's way to protect Americans.
I have no idea how many military rescues there were in the Bush era. What does that have to do with the price of tea in China??
-
How can you not be? I dont get it. 7 hours notice and obama was watching on closed-circuit? And blaming it on a video?
Impeaching a prez over hiding a BJ, but this isn't worthy? I dont get it? ???
We don't know Obama's involvement. We also don't know all the facts.
What does Clinton have to do with this?
-
BS. Like I said, we have people all over the ME. They had no idea whether the attack would last one hour or twenty-four hours. Every operation involving hostile fire puts lives in danger, and the men and women who serve are willing to put themselves in harm's way to protect Americans.
I have no idea how many military rescues there were in the Bush era. What does that have to do with the price of tea in China??
so i wonder who knows more a Former Secretary of Defense or a guy named beach bum from getbig bbbbrrrrrhhhahahahahahah aha to much :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates forcefully defended the Obama administration on Sunday against charges that it did not do enough to prevent the tragedy in Benghazi, telling CBS' "Face the Nation" that some critics of the administration have a "cartoonish impression of military capabilities and military forces."
Gates, a Republican who was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2006 and agreed to stay through more than two years of President Obama's first term, repeatedly declined to criticize the policymakers who devised a response to the September 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya, that left four Americans dead, including the U.S. Ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens.
"Frankly, had I been in the job at the time, I think my decisions would have been just as theirs were," said Gates, now the chancellor of the College of William and Mary.
"We don't have a ready force standing by in the Middle East, and so getting somebody there in a timely way would have been very difficult, if not impossible." he explained.
Suggestions that we could have flown a fighter jet over the attackers to "scare them with the noise or something," Gates said, ignored the "number of surface to air missiles that have disappeared from [former Libyan leader] Qaddafi's arsenals."
"I would not have approved sending an aircraft, a single aircraft, over Benghazi under those circumstances," he said.
Another suggestion posed by some critics of the administration, to, as Gates said, "send some small number of special forces or other troops in without knowing what the environment is, without knowing what the threat is, without having any intelligence in terms of what is actually going on on the ground, would have been very dangerous."
"It's sort of a cartoonish impression of military capabilities and military forces," he said. "The one thing that our forces are noted for is planning and preparation before we send people in harm's way, and there just wasn't time to do that."
-
We don't know Obama's involvement. We also don't know all the facts.
What does Clinton have to do with this?
I think obama should be impeached for allowing this to happen, and leading the cheap cover-up of the death of brave americans.
Clinton, we'll find out her role once we get obama on the stand.
I dislike repubs like mccain and graham that don't think obama should be impeached. Their kneepadding knows no bounds.
-
I think obama should be impeached for allowing this to happen, and leading the cheap cover-up of the death of brave americans.
Clinton, we'll find out her role once we get obama on the stand.
I dislike repubs like mccain and graham that don't think obama should be impeached. Their kneepadding knows no bounds.
Impeach before the facts come in. Shocking.
You're talking about kneepadding? LOL!
-
Impeach before the facts come in. Shocking.
You're talking about kneepadding? LOL!
I'm talking about impeachment. Obama knew. The coverup with right from the white house.
I'm a little shocked, too lol, that I'm accusing repubs of kneepadding and calling for impeachment while they're all "well, we dont know, let's not be rash, let's all have some cookies and let this issue fall to the wayside..."
The fact mcaain scoffed at impeachment - sickens me. I just hope some 2016 hopefuls step up and use the "i" word soon.
-
You said no stand down order was given. He just confirmed the order was given.
I never said Obama gave the order. We don't know that yet.
And they were on their way to Benghazi.
not for an extraction as per the topic, you are circumventing the central argument. No one was ready to go in to help them, fight with them, remove them, thus no stand down was given. There would be no point in securing the airport as they didn't have enough info to follow the best course of action.
There is nothing in this testimony, nothing, so they didn't secure the airport, it wouldn't have made a single good fuck, it's a side show topic that is trying to pin the tail on the donkey, throwin darts hoping they stick, they don't.
-
not for an extraction as per the topic, you are circumventing the central argument. No one was ready to go in to help them, fight with them, remove them, thus no stand down was given. There would be no point in securing the airport as they didn't have enough info to follow the best course of action.
There is nothing in this testimony, nothing, so they didn't secure the airport, it wouldn't have made a single good fuck, it's a side show topic that is trying to pin the tail on the donkey, throwin darts hoping they stick, they don't.
Hicks specifically said troops were ready to board a plane for Benghazi and were told not to board. So yes, service members were ready to go and remove them.
We don't know whether they would have arrived in time or whether they would have saved any lives. We'll never know. But we should have tried. We should have not left them unprotected in the first place, and we should not have left them to endure a seven-hour attack. They were civilians. What we did to those people is unconscionable. And this cuts directly against Obama's claim before the election that he gave an order to do everything possible to protect our people. He did not.
-
Hicks specifically said troops were ready to board a plane for Benghazi and were told not to board. So yes, service members were ready to go and remove them.
We don't know whether they would have arrived in time or whether they would have saved any lives. We'll never know. But we should have tried. We should have not left them unprotected in the first place, and we should not have left them to endure a seven-hour attack. They were civilians. What we did to those people is unconscionable. And this cuts directly against Obama's claim before the election that he gave an order to do everything possible to protect our people. He did not.
yet again
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/05/08/1982151/witnesses-debunk-benghazi/
One of the most shocking reveals in the lead-up to today’s hearing was that a team of Special Forces in Tripoli were told not to deploy to Benghazi during the attack. That decision has led to an uproar on the right, including claims of dereliction of duty towards Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey for not taking actions that could have saved lives.
During questioning, Hicks confirmed that the team was ready to be deployed — not to join the fighting at the CIA annex — but “to secure the airport for the withdrawal of our personnel from Benghazi after the mortar attack.” Hicks also confirmed that it was the second such team to be readied for deployment, with the first having proceeded to Benghazi earlier. Despite the second team not deploying, the staff was all evacuated first to Tripoli, then to Germany, within 18 hours of the attack taking place.
-
I'm talking about impeachment. Obama knew. The coverup with right from the white house.
I'm a little shocked, too lol, that I'm accusing repubs of kneepadding and calling for impeachment while they're all "well, we dont know, let's not be rash, let's all have some cookies and let this issue fall to the wayside..."
The fact mcaain scoffed at impeachment - sickens me. I just hope some 2016 hopefuls step up and use the "i" word soon.
Impeach on what grounds..
and just for shits and giggles....does the fact that Clinton asked for money to secure the embassys around the world, and was turned down, have any place in these "who dropped the ball" hearings?
-
Impeach on what grounds..
and just for shits and giggles....does the fact that Clinton asked for money to secure the embassys around the world, and was turned down, have any place in these "who dropped the ball" hearings?
Bullshit - that is 100% false
-
Bullshit - that is 100% false
so... there wasnt money that was asked for and denied?
-
so... there wasnt money that was asked for and denied?
testimony is that money had nothing to do w the failures of obama and hillary.
-
testimony is that money had nothing to do w the failures of obama and hillary.
GOP Rep: I 'Absolutely' Voted To Cut Funding For Embassy Security | ThinkProgressCurrent Status: Blessed (1)Change Status: BlessedPublishedUnpublis hedRestoredQuarantinedDu plicatedCensored
Seeded by thisbusymonster View Original Article:
Think Progress
Seeded on Thu May 9, 2013 9:13 AM
politicshouse-republicansbenghaziliarshypocritesphonyjerksassholesfraudsjason-chaffetznontroversyDiscuss: 10432!
“[...] hidden beneath the GOP campaign is the fact that House Republicans voted to cut nearly $300 million from the U.S. embassy security budget. When asked if he voted to cut the funds this morning on CNN, Chaffetz said, “Absolutely“:
“O’BRIEN: Is it true that you voted to cut the funding for embassy security?
“CHAFFETZ: Absolutely. Look, we have to make priorities and choices in this country. We have — think about this — 15,000 contractors in Iraq. We have more than 6,000 contractors, private army there for President Obama in Baghdad.
“And we’re talking about can we get two dozen or so people into Libya to help protect our forces? When you’re in tough economic times, you have to make difficult choices how to prioritize this.
So to re-cap, the security situation in the case of Benghazi was entirely the choice of the GOP since they denied additional funding from the security budget.
For the reality-challenged Republicans out there, yes, the House does control the budget process and the President cannot change the budget bill or re-allocate money elsewhere, so Benghazi's lack of security was A REPUBLICAN @!$%# UP. Period.
.
-
Hey fool - go read the testimony.
GOP Rep: I 'Absolutely' Voted To Cut Funding For Embassy Security | ThinkProgressCurrent Status: Blessed (1)Change Status: BlessedPublishedUnpublis hedRestoredQuarantinedDu plicatedCensored
Seeded by thisbusymonster View Original Article:
Think Progress
Seeded on Thu May 9, 2013 9:13 AM
politicshouse-republicansbenghaziliarshypocritesphonyjerksassholesfraudsjason-chaffetznontroversyDiscuss: 10432!
“[...] hidden beneath the GOP campaign is the fact that House Republicans voted to cut nearly $300 million from the U.S. embassy security budget. When asked if he voted to cut the funds this morning on CNN, Chaffetz said, “Absolutely“:
“O’BRIEN: Is it true that you voted to cut the funding for embassy security?
“CHAFFETZ: Absolutely. Look, we have to make priorities and choices in this country. We have — think about this — 15,000 contractors in Iraq. We have more than 6,000 contractors, private army there for President Obama in Baghdad.
“And we’re talking about can we get two dozen or so people into Libya to help protect our forces? When you’re in tough economic times, you have to make difficult choices how to prioritize this.
So to re-cap, the security situation in the case of Benghazi was entirely the choice of the GOP since they denied additional funding from the security budget.
For the reality-challenged Republicans out there, yes, the House does control the budget process and the President cannot change the budget bill or re-allocate money elsewhere, so Benghazi's lack of security was A REPUBLICAN @!$%# UP. Period.
.
-
GOP Rep: I 'Absolutely' Voted To Cut Funding For Embassy Security | ThinkProgressCurrent Status: Blessed (1)Change Status: BlessedPublishedUnpublis hedRestoredQuarantinedDu plicatedCensored
Seeded by thisbusymonster View Original Article:
Think Progress
Seeded on Thu May 9, 2013 9:13 AM
politicshouse-republicansbenghaziliarshypocritesphonyjerksassholesfraudsjason-chaffetznontroversyDiscuss: 10432!
“[...] hidden beneath the GOP campaign is the fact that House Republicans voted to cut nearly $300 million from the U.S. embassy security budget. When asked if he voted to cut the funds this morning on CNN, Chaffetz said, “Absolutely“:
“O’BRIEN: Is it true that you voted to cut the funding for embassy security?
“CHAFFETZ: Absolutely. Look, we have to make priorities and choices in this country. We have — think about this — 15,000 contractors in Iraq. We have more than 6,000 contractors, private army there for President Obama in Baghdad.
“And we’re talking about can we get two dozen or so people into Libya to help protect our forces? When you’re in tough economic times, you have to make difficult choices how to prioritize this.
So to re-cap, the security situation in the case of Benghazi was entirely the choice of the GOP since they denied additional funding from the security budget.
For the reality-challenged Republicans out there, yes, the House does control the budget process and the President cannot change the budget bill or re-allocate money elsewhere, so Benghazi's lack of security was A REPUBLICAN @!$%# UP. Period.
.
Total red herring. The Obama Administration already admitted the funding reduction had nothing to do with the lack of security in Benghazi.
-
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/19/1147325/-House-GOP-Paul-Ryan-Cut-400M-from-Embassy-Safety-Funding
TheNewDeal00FollowRSS
Daily Kos memberProfileDiaries (list)Stream.Fri Oct 19, 2012 at 07:15 PM PDT.
House GOP, Paul Ryan Cut $400M from Embassy Safety Fundingby TheNewDeal00Follow .
63 Comments / 63 New.This sad, ugly attack from the GOP trying to pin the murders of 4 Americans on President Obama is starting to backfire hard.
.
I'm sure everyone saw the debate where Obama schooled Romney so hard on the Libya attacks and his exploitation of them to the point that it almost looked like Romney was going to cry... almost.
Well its not looking any better for the GOP. This was the wrong fight to pick and now it is blowing up in their face....
House Republicans cut the administration’s request for embassy security funding by $128 million in fiscal 2011 and $331 million in fiscal 2012....Last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans’ proposed cuts to her department would be “detrimental to America’s national security” — a charge Republicans rejected.
Ryan, Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryan’s budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security.
Mother Jones
You read that right. As Romney and Ryan take turns slamming Obama over 4 Americans killed at our embassy in Libya, Paul Ryan voted to cut over $400 Million from foreign embassy safety funding. You know, funding used to prevent attacks from happening.
The same goes for Darrell Issa, the GOP's head witch hunter.
They have the nerve to bitch that there should have been more protection at the embassy after they cut $400 Million from funding that would have provided more protection.
Maybe they'll now understand why running through a budget with a machete and cutting everything in sight probably isn't a good idea.
But I'm won't hold my breath.
I think the GOP should apologize to the family members affected by this attack, A) for politicizing their deaths and using it to falsely smear Obama B) for cutting funding that would have been used to prevent this attack and possibly saved their lives.
I also think they should apologize to President Obama and his Administration.
Trying to pin these murders on Obama and use it against him is a pretty cold move.
When 3,000 Americans were killed on US soil, we didn't use it to try to bring down a President we didn't like (and didn't even win). We came together and out our differences aside. I have no confidence or proof that Republicans would do the same if the tables were turned.
The Iraq war is what polarized Bush and turned half the country against him. Amongst other things...
Obama deserves an apology from Mitt Romney and the GOP for using a tragedy to try and smear him when the House GOP voted to cut funding that may have prevented that tragedy.
But once again... I won't hold my breath.
.
-
Total red herring. The Obama Administration already admitted the funding reduction had nothing to do with the lack of security in Benghazi.
so the hearing is about a direct order from Obama make soliders stand down?
-
so the hearing is about a direct order from Obama make soliders stand down?
No. It's about why we didn't properly protect our civilians, why we didn't do everything we could to try and save them, and why we lied about the cause of the terrorist attack. Overall, it's about truth and accountability.
-
No. It's about why we didn't properly protect our civilians, why we didn't do everything we could to try and save them, and why we lied about the cause of the terrorist attack. Overall, it's about truth and accountability.
ok...let me get this straight...you are saying this is a 2 headed objective of this hearing on the embassy attack?
One that says there could have been more done and President Obama is accountable...
Forgetting that there were 50+ embassy attacks resulting in 3 American Deaths with not a peep from anyone...
and the Other objective is to find a cover up about the source of the attacks with no real endgame or motive of a cover up...
Correct?
-
Its only political because obama covered up and was denying the obvious and kept bullshitting the families to cover up his lies and incompetence.
ok...let me get this straight...you are saying this is a 2 headed objective of this hearing on the embassy attack?
One that says there could have been more done and President Obama is accountable...
Forgetting that there were 50+ embassy attacks resulting in 3 American Deaths with not a peep from anyone...
and the Other objective is to find a cover up about the source of the attacks with no real endgame or motive of a cover up...
Correct?
-
Its only political because obama covered up and was denying the obvious and kept bullshitting the families to cover up his lies and incompetence.
what did he cover up.
-
what did he cover up.
1. The cause of the attack
2. Who did the attack
3. What the people on the ground told hillary the night of the attack
4. The state of security of the embassy before the attack
Etc etc etc
-
1. The cause of the attack
2. Who did the attack
3. What the people on the ground told hillary the night of the attack
4. The state of security of the embassy before the attack
Etc etc etc
so it was a terroist attack right?
-
so it was a terroist attack right?
It was an al quaeda attack pre planned that had nothing whatsoever to do w a video and there was nothing spontaneous about it like oshit and hillary and rice said
-
It was an al quaeda attack pre planned that had nothing whatsoever to do w a video and there was nothing spontaneous about it like oshit and hillary and rice said
so was it a terroist attack?
-
so was it a terroist attack?
STFU - more word games to avoid admitting obama rice and hillary lied and tried to cover this up.
-
STFU - more word games to avoid admitting obama rice and hillary lied and tried to cover this up.
lol...relax...if you are fact based this is easy...you stated that he lied on the source of the attack...
and when he addressed the attack...he referred to it as an act of terror...no?
so are you saying it wasnt an act of terror?
-
ok...let me get this straight...you are saying this is a 2 headed objective of this hearing on the embassy attack?
One that says there could have been more done and President Obama is accountable...
Forgetting that there were 50+ embassy attacks resulting in 3 American Deaths with not a peep from anyone...
and the Other objective is to find a cover up about the source of the attacks with no real endgame or motive of a cover up...
Correct?
Not exactly. Yes it's about whether more could have been done to provide better security and to try and help them after the attack started.
No it's not about the 50+embassy attacks you referenced, which really have nothing to do with Benghazi.
Yes it's about finding out why they scrubbed the talking points and why they repeatedly lied to the American public.
-
lol...relax...if you are fact based this is easy...you stated that he lied on the source of the attack...
and when he addressed the attack...he referred to it as an act of terror...no?
so are you saying it wasnt an act of terror?
Yes they did moron - that was the basis of the editing of the talking points and then spending weeks and time blaming a video instead of al aqueada as the cause of the attack.
Bro - in all seriousness - you are a disgrace on all levels to shill for Pres. Preezzyyy like this all cause he is black.
-
Not exactly. Yes it's about whether more could have been done to provide better security and to try and help them after the attack started.
No it's not about the 50+embassy attacks you referenced, which really have nothing to do with Benghazi.
Yes it's about finding out why they scrubbed the talking points and why they repeatedly lied to the American public.
so...the lack of security on the embassy is categorized as a scandal?
-
so...the lack of security on the embassy is categorized as a scandal?
Partly considering Stevens and others begged State Dept for more security and instead they got some local sand rats w flashlights instead of real security. But that is only part of it.
-
Partly considering Stevens and others begged State Dept for more security and instead they got some local sand rats w flashlights instead of real security. But that is only part of it.
Sooooo the fact the that funds were asked for and voted down have no blame?
-
Sooooo the fact the that funds were asked for and voted down have no blame?
He moron - the people from the State Department testified funding had nothing to do w the level of security at the embassy that was requested.
-
He moron - the people from the State Department testified funding had nothing to do w the level of security at the embassy that was requested.
so whats the level of security or lack of...a result of?
-
so whats the level of security or lack of...a result of?
Politics from Obama admn kneepadding muslim sand rats and keeping the military out of the CIA run annex who was running guns to Syrian rebels since the military was probably not being told about it.
-
so...the lack of security on the embassy is categorized as a scandal?
Who said that?
-
Politics from Obama admn kneepadding muslim sand rats and keeping the military out of the CIA run annex who was running guns to Syrian rebels since the military was probably not being told about it.
Oh wow.. thats crazy....any proof of this?
-
Oh wow.. thats crazy....any proof of this?
Its been posted here many times - too bad you ignore these threads since they don't comport w the image of obama as the nobel peace prize winning progressive messiah you voted for twice
-
Who said that?
you did... i asked what was the scandal..and you said Benghazi
i asked what were the issues.. and you said the first prong was reguarding why the embassy wasnt properly secured...
did you not?
-
Its been posted here many times - too bad you ignore these threads since they don't comport w the image of obama as the nobel peace prize winning progressive messiah you voted for twice
sooooo... please post the proof of this
Politics from Obama admn kneepadding muslim sand rats and keeping the military out of the CIA run annex who was running guns to Syrian rebels since the military was probably not being told about it.
-
you did... i asked what was the scandal..and you said Benghazi
i asked what were the issues.. and you said the first prong was reguarding why the embassy wasnt properly secured...
did you not?
No. I did not say "the lack of security on the embassy is categorized as a scandal." I cited a number of things. Go back and read them. All of them taken as a whole are the "scandal." Did you watch the clip by Pirro? That sums up everything I think about it at the moment.
-
No. It's about why we didn't properly protect our civilians, why we didn't do everything we could to try and save them, and why we lied about the cause of the terrorist attack. Overall, it's about truth and accountability.
so the second part of the post is the scandal part?
-
so the second part of the post is the scandal part?
Its everything taken together. The lies about security before the attack, the actions the night of the attack, the cover up after thwe attack.
Why can't you admit what is so freaking plainly obvious?
-
Its everything taken together. The lies about security before the attack, the actions the night of the attack, the cover up after thwe attack.
Why can't you admit what is so freaking plainly obvious?
^^^ This.
-
[ Invalid YouTube link ]
-
HAHAHA. Whiners gonna whine.
-
He moron - the people from the State Department testified funding had nothing to do w the level of security at the embassy that was requested.
do you not expect them to improve change the talking points as evidence and facts emerge? should they have just said something without enough info. Didn't patreus indicate that the video explanation served as a decoy, that they did not want to divulge the actual cause.
-
do you not expect them to improve change the talking points as evidence and facts emerge? should they have just said something without enough info. Didn't patreus indicate that the video explanation served as a decoy, that they did not want to divulge the actual cause.
FAIL - Hicks testified that he told hillary that night the cause of the attack, and hillary and obama still blamed a video for weeks on end knowing said lie was total bs.
And further - to date - not one person has been held accountable or brought to justice
Obama lied - SEALS died
-
FAIL - Hicks testified that he told hillary that night the cause of the attack, and hillary and obama still blamed a video for weeks on end knowing said lie was total bs.
And further - to date - not one person has been held accountable or brought to justice
Obama lied - SEALS died
obamas address the next day said it was an act of terror, what are you talking about.
-
obamas address the next day said it was an act of terror, what are you talking about.
Then why did he spend the next 5 weeks blaming the video?
-
Hear is the reality - hillary and obama are two criminals
-
FAIL - Hicks testified that he told hillary that night the cause of the attack, and hillary and obama still blamed a video for weeks on end knowing said lie was total bs.
And further - to date - not one person has been held accountable or brought to justice
Obama lied - SEALS died
post this quote please, I am sure you are off base as usual.
Just watch this fucking quote full or maybies, possibles or some shit.