Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: healthiswealth on January 06, 2006, 07:03:15 PM

Title: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: healthiswealth on January 06, 2006, 07:03:15 PM
I was just chilling with the friends watching rocky IV for the 10 millionth time and the convo broke down to who had more muscle (in proportion). My friend says that stallone is much more muscular than drago, while my thoughts are the exact opposite.


Enlighten me...
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: sarcasm on January 06, 2006, 07:05:04 PM
they were both small as fuck, Lundgren prolly weighed 210 and Stallone was 165.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: healthiswealth on January 06, 2006, 07:07:58 PM
they were both small as f**k, Lundgren prolly weighed 210 and Stallone was 165.

thanks for answering my question.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: njflex on January 06, 2006, 07:30:01 PM
I think stallone was more conditioned hardness wise ,lundgren held some bulk and water ,stallone was also older and training intense longer,but dolph did that awful master of the universe movie but gained serious hard mass to play role and would have smoked stallone like a cigar if they stood side by side,now i'm sure stallone is still in harder shape than lundgren.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: 420 Diesel on January 06, 2006, 07:47:30 PM
Stallone didn't hit his physical peak until long after the Roicky series.  If you watch Cliffhanger, Judge Dredd or Demolition Man (none of which were very good movies), you'll see that he later attained a quite respectable physique.  Stallone at his best was far better than Lundgren.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: njflex on January 06, 2006, 08:13:05 PM
True he looked really good in cliffhanger.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: BigAlski on January 06, 2006, 08:20:42 PM
Sly is a great action actor and shouldn't be considered "B" grade.  He plays his charecter well.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: 420 Diesel on January 06, 2006, 08:25:04 PM
I thought king kamali played Judge Dredd.
nah, they needed someone muscular for the role.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Bast000 on January 06, 2006, 08:25:54 PM
Here is Sly with Mike Arvilla:

(http://www.shinkendo-europe.com/images/demolition_man.jpg)

Kamali:

(http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/hollywood_pictures/judge_dredd/sylvester_stallone/dredd.jpg)
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: The True Adonis on January 06, 2006, 10:29:07 PM
Dolph Lundgren`s max bench was 315 when he was filming ROCKY IV.  He posted this on his website message board.  He had a better physique.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Bast000 on January 06, 2006, 10:47:32 PM
Monster weight!

(http://stallonestories.com/mf/mf8604/p105SlyDolph.jpg)

http://stallonestories.com/mf/mf8510/training.htm

Columbo is quoted to say that Sly had 18 inch arms with a 29 inch waist.  That's impressive if accurate.

(http://stallonestories.com/mf/mf8510/p103debout.jpg)
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on January 06, 2006, 10:59:32 PM
LOL thats quite a codpeice on judge dredd.
stallone was always pretty shredded but never very big. i doubt his arms were 18 inches, especially considering he is only like 5-7
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Bluto on January 07, 2006, 02:35:41 AM
Dolph was 233 pounds in Rocky and 242 in Masters of the Universe.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: phyxsius on January 07, 2006, 02:50:15 AM
Kamali:

(http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/hollywood_pictures/judge_dredd/sylvester_stallone/dredd.jpg)

I don't think Kamali did appreciate the movie Judge Dredd
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: ieffinhatecardio on January 07, 2006, 06:25:15 AM
Sly is a great action actor and shouldn't be considered "B" grade.  He plays his charecter well.

True, he should be considered "F" grade.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: suckmymuscle on January 07, 2006, 07:20:06 AM
I was just chilling with the friends watching rocky IV for the 10 millionth time and the convo broke down to who had more muscle (in proportion). My friend says that stallone is much more muscular than drago, while my thoughts are the exact opposite.


Enlighten me...

  No.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: LLES on January 07, 2006, 07:38:05 AM
Dolph was 233 pounds in Rocky and 242 in Masters of the Universe.



But consider the fact that Dolph is 6'6. It's not that impressive at all.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: sarcasm on January 07, 2006, 07:41:44 AM
Monster weight!

(http://stallonestories.com/mf/mf8604/p105SlyDolph.jpg)

http://stallonestories.com/mf/mf8510/training.htm

Columbo is quoted to say that Sly had 18 inch arms with a 29 inch waist.  That's impressive if accurate.

(http://stallonestories.com/mf/mf8510/p103debout.jpg)
18 inch arms, hahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Bossa on January 07, 2006, 08:34:56 AM
Columbo is quoted to say that Sly had 18 inch arms with a 29 inch waist.  That's impressive if accurate.

BWAHAHAHAHAHA 16" is alot more likely...you don't have 18" arms at 165
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: sarcasm on January 07, 2006, 08:36:11 AM
BWAHAHAHAHAHA 16" is alot more likely...you don't have 18" arms at 165
i was gonna say 14" is more likely the truth.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Karl Kox on January 07, 2006, 08:42:44 AM
Stallone has never impressed me with his physique
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Bluto on January 07, 2006, 09:02:39 AM


But consider the fact that Dolph is 6'6. It's not that impressive at all.

6'4 more likely but from a bodybuilding perspective it might not be too impressive, but as an actor there's not much point of getting even bigger
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: BigAlski on January 07, 2006, 09:39:27 AM
I think Sly's bank account would impress you :).  Dolph is not a poor man either.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: c-u-n-hell on January 07, 2006, 09:54:35 AM
I think Sly's bank account would impress you :).  Dolph is not a poor man either.
I thought we were debating physiques not $ but MC Hammer outshines all of them
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Quickerblade on January 07, 2006, 10:41:21 AM
I think Sly's bank account would impress you :).  Dolph is not a poor man either.
I dont think sly is a rich as you think, his Rocky 1,2,3 and First blood money went to his first wife, His Rocky 4,Rambo 2 , Cobra and Over the top money went to Brigitte nielsen, his still a millionaire but he did take huge losses including Planet Hollywood.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Captain Equipoise on January 07, 2006, 10:45:33 AM
Guys, keep in mind Stallone is 5'6 - 5'7 and Dolph is around 6'5
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: luc on January 07, 2006, 12:15:22 PM
Monster triceps! HaHaHaHaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Bluto on January 07, 2006, 12:24:17 PM
Actually Stallone made his biggest money in recent years, $20,000,000 per film since Judge Dredd in 1995.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Scimowser on January 07, 2006, 02:55:18 PM
stallones personal fortune is around the $125 million mark, FACT
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: BigAlski on January 07, 2006, 03:04:26 PM
I don't know but I heard he was a good guy, some dude at my gym gets his magazine "SLY" and says hes a good dude.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: sarcasm on January 07, 2006, 04:58:34 PM
I don't know but I heard he was a good guy, some dude at my gym gets his magazine "SLY" and says hes a good dude.
ok, "big alski", hahahaha. ::)
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Bear on January 08, 2006, 05:23:17 AM
More pics!
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Bluto on January 08, 2006, 05:31:54 AM
(http://www.vnn.vn/dataimages/original/images361175_Avedon_Stallone_Schiffer_Versace.jpg)
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: sarcasm on January 08, 2006, 08:01:11 AM
monster quads.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: 240 is Back on January 08, 2006, 08:35:07 AM
monster quads.

LOL!
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: gmflex on January 08, 2006, 09:16:15 AM
The only thing stallone is good at is getting ripped
Rambo 2  :o
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: blinky on January 08, 2006, 09:21:46 AM
nice to see brigette neilsen has aged gracefully since rocky IV ;D
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: sculpture on January 08, 2006, 09:55:57 AM
The only thing stallone is good at is getting ripped
Rambo 2  :o

I take that over building muscle any day. Whats the point in having muscles (from an aesthetic standpoint purely) if theyre obscured by a veneer of chub. I'd rather keep the muscle i have currently and reach single digit bf, improve density and maturity than continue to bulk aimlessly.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Bluto on January 08, 2006, 10:18:34 AM
(http://biografieonline.it/img/bio/s/Sylvester_Stallone.jpg)

Stallone at 54
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: blinky on January 08, 2006, 10:20:08 AM
(http://biografieonline.it/img/bio/s/Sylvester_Stallone.jpg)

Stallone at 54

not bad but how would he look if his hands werent pushing out his bi's
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Bluto on January 08, 2006, 10:24:20 AM
I don't know but I do know that I'm holding my arms like that pretty much all the time when I'm not on here typing, and I've been doing that with great success for the last couple of years! Try it!
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: blinky on January 08, 2006, 10:27:35 AM
 ;D   lol
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Army of One on January 08, 2006, 10:29:48 AM
MONSTER PENIS
(http://www.cinemale.com/guests/weeklyfree/italianstalSlyStalloneDVD1.jpg)
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Bluto on January 08, 2006, 10:32:56 AM
Doesn't seems like he have an erection even, is this how gay rumours get started?
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Bossa on January 08, 2006, 10:37:18 AM
MONSTER PENIS

Monster 70's porno bush :-X
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: gracie bjj on January 08, 2006, 12:58:48 PM
i heard he had an affair with franco and arnold
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: sarcasm on January 08, 2006, 03:59:07 PM
i heard he had an affair with franco and arnold
hahahahaha, he did a "movie" with them called the Italian Power Bottom.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: jwb on January 09, 2006, 01:34:22 PM
Dolph is 6 foot 2

Sly is 5 foot 7
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Ursus on January 09, 2006, 02:28:41 PM
i watched a chat show on uk tv and he sed he was 6;6
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: onlyme on January 09, 2006, 10:05:24 PM
Dolph is taller than 6'2".  More like 6'5" or close to that.  He was taller than me and I am 6'1"
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: de Rooij on January 10, 2006, 03:14:03 AM
(http://www.harry-potter-games.com/Images/malfoy1.jpg)

Does he even work out???!
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Bear on January 10, 2006, 07:37:10 AM
Monster 70's porno bush :-X

lol!
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Scimowser on January 10, 2006, 11:27:59 AM
i cant believe you even thought he was 6"2!  ::)
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Traps Hoolihan on January 10, 2006, 12:20:54 PM
Not up on my Gay terms. What does "power-Bottom" Mean? It's probably something I don't want to know!
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: tommywishbone on January 10, 2006, 01:01:29 PM
Dolph is taller than 6'2".  More like 6'5" or close to that.  He was taller than me and I am 6'1"

I'd say 6'4". Big frame & some solid muscle. I saw him at Gold's Hollywood from time-to-time.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Darren Avey on January 11, 2006, 07:40:52 AM
Dolph is taller than 6'2".  More like 6'5" or close to that.  He was taller than me and I am 6'1"

He was taller than you? So you met him? Is there anyone you DONT claim to have met? ???
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: The Ugly on January 15, 2006, 08:38:18 AM
Actually, dude's prolly 5'11". Everyone knows Sly's a Shire-dwellin' troll.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Darren Avey on January 15, 2006, 12:37:00 PM
Onlyme knows lots of stars

So do i
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Darren Avey on January 16, 2006, 10:53:29 AM
you suck dicks.

You re the one that sucks dicks , you work in a gay bar cleaning nutsacks and you drink sperm instead of milk
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Darren Avey on January 17, 2006, 09:21:30 AM
you have no proof, just an E-thug.

I dont need proof im psychic, so i closed my eyes and saw what a fag you are!
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Lundgren on September 27, 2010, 07:38:44 PM
(http://www.harry-potter-games.com/Images/malfoy1.jpg)

Does he even work out???!
funny
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Mr.1derful on September 27, 2010, 07:49:47 PM
I was just chilling with the friends watching rocky IV for the 10 millionth time and the convo broke down to who had more muscle (in proportion). My friend says that stallone is much more muscular than drago, while my thoughts are the exact opposite.


Enlighten me...

Watch the intros before the fight, and one thing I always noticed was that Dolph had a weak back compared to Sly.  From the front, Dolph looked great though.
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: HTexan on September 27, 2010, 08:05:58 PM
sly = actor wannabe bber
Arnold = bber wannabe actor

 
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Darren Avey on September 28, 2010, 01:55:23 AM
Im sure you ve made a far bigger success of your life than either of them "HtTexan"  ::)
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: TEsticles on September 28, 2010, 03:05:32 AM
Im sure you ve made a far bigger success of your life than either of them "HtTexan"  ::)
lol at waiting 4yrs to sledge someone on the same thread.......
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Flexb on September 28, 2010, 06:01:42 AM
(http://www.nostalgiaholic.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/youngdolph1.jpg)

(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_rSxN1ZpttWw/SP5PncvuCRI/AAAAAAAAAHI/2J3KXUpphIA/s400/Dolph+Lundgren+53.jpg)


(http://woodenspears.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/dolph-lundgren.jpg)

Sad that we all gotta get older sometime  :-\
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: HTexan on September 28, 2010, 07:18:43 AM


lol at waiting 4yrs to sledge someone on the same thread.......
lol
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: JP_RC on September 28, 2010, 07:58:59 AM
Both get dwarfed by Arnold.........
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Christian B on September 28, 2010, 03:20:12 PM
Could Dolph have been Mr. O if he had trained and juiced for it?
I guess with his frame he would have had to be about 300 pounds?
Title: Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
Post by: Nails on September 28, 2010, 03:31:31 PM
Could Dolph have been Mr. O if he had trained and juiced for it?
I guess with his frame he would have had to be about 300 pounds?

HE could have been juiced to the grill would have never gotten close to beating  Lee Haney (1984 - 1991) or Dorian Yates (1992 - 1997)